Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #203636 > unrolled thread

If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity...

Started byJeff-Relf.Me @.
First post2018-09-11 10:37 -0700
Last post2018-09-14 00:09 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 505 — 32 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-11 10:37 -0700
    Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-11 17:52 +0000
      Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-11 15:46 -0400
    Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-11 19:03 +0000
      If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-11 12:49 -0700
    Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-11 19:24 +0000
      I can't help women and thieving junkies. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-11 13:11 -0700
      Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-11 21:41 +0000
        I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-11 15:20 -0700
          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 16:22 -0600
          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-12 00:38 +0000
            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-12 06:43 +0000
              Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-12 06:54 -0700
                Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-16 17:49 -0500
                  Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 16:17 -0700
                  Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-16 17:27 -0700
                    Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 00:32 +0000
                      Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-16 17:34 -0700
                        Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 00:38 +0000
                          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-16 18:33 -0700
                            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 01:53 +0000
                              Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-16 18:58 -0700
                            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:00 +0000
                      Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 17:42 -0700
                        Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 00:47 +0000
                          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 17:48 -0700
                            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 00:50 +0000
                              Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 17:58 -0700
                                Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 01:03 +0000
                                  Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 18:07 -0700
                                    Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 01:09 +0000
                                      Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 18:13 -0700
                                        Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 01:18 +0000
                                          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 18:19 -0700
                                            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 01:22 +0000
                                              Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 18:31 -0700
                        Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-16 18:32 -0700
                          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 18:34 -0700
                            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 01:50 +0000
                              Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 18:55 -0700
                                Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 01:59 +0000
                                  Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 19:05 -0700
                                    Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 02:11 +0000
                                      Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 19:16 -0700
                            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-16 18:58 -0700
                              Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 19:03 -0700
                      Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-17 16:47 +0000
                        Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 09:50 -0700
                          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:00 -0700
                          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-18 00:05 +0000
                            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 17:10 -0700
                    Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 17:41 -0700
                      Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-16 18:33 -0700
                        Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 18:35 -0700
                          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 01:56 +0000
                            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 18:59 -0700
                              Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-17 02:00 +0000
                                Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 19:05 -0700
                          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-16 18:58 -0700
                            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 19:00 -0700
                  Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-17 13:04 +0000
              Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 08:40 -0600
                Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-12 20:51 +0000
                  Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 14:00 -0700
                  Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 15:11 -0600
                    Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-12 21:40 +0000
                      Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 15:41 -0600
                        Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-12 21:44 +0000
                          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 17:01 -0600
                            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-13 00:10 +0000
                              Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 20:47 -0600
                                Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-13 05:47 +0000
                            Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 20:46 -0600
              Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-12 16:19 +0000
                Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-12 16:59 -0700
          Re: I wasn't feeding her pride well enough. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 22:51 -0400
            Ben Jacoby's rules. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-11 19:58 -0700
              Re: Ben Jacoby's rules. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 11:10 -0400
                She thought she could dump me and keep the money. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-12 12:14 -0700
                  Re: She thought she could dump me and keep the money. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 15:24 -0400
        Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-12 06:42 +0000
          Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 11:22 -0400
          Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-12 16:18 +0000
            Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 12:59 -0400
              Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-12 18:19 +0000
                Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 15:30 -0400
                  Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-13 13:02 +0000
                    Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 10:58 -0400
                      Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-13 16:09 +0000
                        Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-13 11:49 -0500
                          Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-13 21:27 +0000
                            Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-13 16:57 -0500
                            Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 08:21 -0600
                              Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 10:39 -0500
                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 11:06 -0600
                                  Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 12:22 -0500
                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowfl Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 11:29 -0600
                                      Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowfl ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 13:19 -0500
                                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowfl ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 17:15 -0600
                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Conscripted snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-15 00:20 +0100
                                            Re: ? Snowflake ?? Conscripted Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 17:31 -0600
                                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Conscripted snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-15 00:46 +0100
                                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Conscripted Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-15 03:30 +0000
                                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Conscripted kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-15 05:55 -0400
                        Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 13:23 -0700
                          Suck my dick. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-13 14:34 -0700
                            Re: Suck my dick. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 14:40 -0700
                            Re: Suck my dick. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 21:48 -0700
                              Robbing the poor. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-13 21:54 -0700
                                Re: Robbing the poor. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 11:14 -0400
                                  Re: Robbing the poor. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-15 03:33 +0000
                                    You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-14 23:33 -0700
                                      Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 10:44 -0400
                                        Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-15 16:10 +0000
                                          Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 09:14 -0700
                                            Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-15 10:28 -0600
                                          Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 12:36 -0400
                                            Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-15 16:52 +0000
                                              Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 10:43 -0700
                                                Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-15 12:45 -0600
                                            Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 10:39 -0700
                                              Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-15 12:43 -0600
                                                Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 11:55 -0700
                                                  Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-15 15:28 -0600
                                                    Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-15 15:37 -0600
                                                      Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-16 05:59 +0000
                                                        Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-16 08:51 -0600
                                                          Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-16 11:20 -0400
                                                            Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-16 10:45 -0600
                                                              Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:05 +0000
                                                                Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 08:56 -0600
                                                                  Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 18:51 +0000
                                                                    Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 14:56 -0400
                                                                    Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:09 -0600
                                                                      Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:20 +0000
                                                                        Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:22 -0600
                                                                          Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:25 +0000
                                                                            Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 14:43 -0500
                                                                              Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 14:59 -0600
                                                                            Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 14:58 -0600
                                                                        Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Tommy <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 21:56 +0000
                                                                    Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 14:20 -0500
                                                            Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-16 10:46 -0600
                                                Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-16 05:59 +0000
                                                  Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-16 08:50 -0600
                                        Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-16 05:58 +0000
                                          Re: You'd rob "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ). benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 12:59 -0400
                                    Re: Robbing the poor. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 10:40 -0400
                                      Re: Robbing the poor. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-15 16:06 +0000
                                Re: Robbing the poor. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 09:54 -0700
                                  Re: Robbing the poor. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-14 13:09 -0400
                                    Re: Robbing the poor. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-14 12:28 -0500
                                      Re: Robbing the poor. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 22:15 -0700
                                        Ashamed. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 00:44 -0700
                                          Re: Ashamed. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 00:52 -0700
                                            Don't worry about me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 01:58 -0700
                                              Re: Don't worry about me. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 02:06 -0700
                                    Re: Robbing the poor. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-14 17:51 +0000
                                      Re: Robbing the poor. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 22:15 -0700
                                    Re: Robbing the poor. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 22:12 -0700
                                  Re: Robbing the poor. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-14 12:13 -0500
                                    Re: Robbing the poor. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-14 13:19 -0400
                                      Re: Robbing the poor. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 22:14 -0700
                                        You won't admit that you're stealing. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-14 23:54 -0700
                                          Re: You won't admit that you're stealing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 00:49 -0700
                                            Re: You won't admit that you're stealing. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-15 08:08 +0000
                                              Nice spin, doctor. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 01:31 -0700
                                                Re: Nice spin, doctor. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 01:46 -0700
                                              Re: You won't admit that you're stealing. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 01:45 -0700
                                              The left also hates families. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 04:49 -0700
                                                Re: The left also hates families. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-15 07:51 -0400
                                                  You're Exhibit A. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 04:57 -0700
                                                    Re: You're Exhibit A. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-15 09:26 -0400
                                                    Re: You're Exhibit A. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-15 09:38 -0400
                                                    Re: You're Exhibit A. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 10:58 -0400
                                                      Re: You're Exhibit A. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-15 11:07 -0400
                                                        Re: You're Exhibit A. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-15 11:54 -0400
                                                          Re: You're Exhibit A. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-15 14:04 -0400
                                                            Re: You're Exhibit A. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-15 14:23 -0400
                                                  Re: The left also hates families. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 10:57 -0400
                                                    Re: The left also hates families. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-16 06:01 +0000
                                                      Re: The left also hates families. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:00 -0400
                                                Re: The left also hates families. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 10:53 -0400
                                                  Re: The left also hates families. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-16 06:02 +0000
                                                    Re: The left also hates families. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:04 -0400
                                                      Re: The left also hates families. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:07 +0000
                                                Re: The left also hates families. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 08:13 -0700
                                                  No one can get a boner then, much less raise a family. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 11:17 -0700
                                                    Re: No one can get a boner then, much less raise a family. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 11:24 -0700
                                                      As tempting as this sounds, men aren't lured in. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 15:34 -0700
                                                        Re: As tempting as this sounds, men aren't lured in. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-15 18:46 -0400
                                                          When was the last time you had sex ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 16:15 -0700
                                                            Re: When was the last time you had sex ? % <%@%> - 2018-09-15 16:33 -0700
                                                              Thanks for your time, Mr. Trump. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 18:22 -0700
                                                                Re: Thanks for your time, Mr. Trump. % <%@%> - 2018-09-15 18:25 -0700
                                                            Re: When was the last time you had sex ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-15 19:36 -0400
                                                              Re: When was the last time you had sex ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 17:57 -0700
                                                            Re: When was the last time you had sex ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-15 19:41 -0400
                                                          Re: As tempting as this sounds, men aren't lured in. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-17 18:02 -0500
                                                            Re: As tempting as this sounds, men aren't lured in. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 16:07 -0700
                                                              Re: As tempting as this sounds, men aren't lured in. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 20:09 -0700
                                                            Re: As tempting as this sounds, men aren't lured in. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 19:56 -0400
                                                              Re: As tempting as this sounds, men aren't lured in. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-18 07:21 +0000
                                                        Re: As tempting as this sounds, men aren't lured in. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-16 06:07 +0000
                                                        Their parents are 13, probably. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-16 16:54 -0700
                                                          Re: Their parents are 13, probably. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 17:07 -0700
                                                    Re: No one can get a boner then, much less raise a family. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-15 14:01 -0500
                                                      Re: No one can get a boner then, much less raise a family. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 12:06 -0700
                                                      No they conceive thieving junkies left and right. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 16:10 -0700
                                              Re: You won't admit that you're stealing. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-15 15:57 +0000
                                              Collectivists shamelessly "rape" individualists. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 11:02 -0700
                                                Re: Collectivists shamelessly "rape" individualists. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-15 14:15 -0400
                                                  Re: πŸ”«πŸ”«πŸ”«β° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! β°πŸ”«πŸ”«πŸ”« Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" πŸ”«πŸ”«πŸ”«β° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  β°πŸ”«πŸ”«πŸ”«β„ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Collectivists shamelessly "rape" individualists. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-15 20:34 -0500
                                                    β€” πŸ”«πŸ”«πŸ”«β° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  β°πŸ”«πŸ”«πŸ”« ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Collectivists shamelessly "rape" individualists. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2018-09-16 14:36 +1000
                                            Who's doing it to whom. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 01:11 -0700
                                    Re: Robbing the poor. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 22:13 -0700
                                      You're a cog in the machine, not the mastermind. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-14 23:44 -0700
                                        Re: You're a cog in the machine, not the mastermind. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 23:56 -0700
                                          The rapist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 00:29 -0700
                                            Re: The rapist. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-15 07:41 +0000
                                              Every rapist ever. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 00:59 -0700
                                                Re: Every rapist ever. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-15 08:10 +0000
                                                  Every rapist ever. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 01:34 -0700
                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-15 06:03 -0400
                                                      You're gonna sue me for not liking my "ass rape" ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 04:29 -0700
                                                        Re: You're gonna sue me for not liking my "ass rape" ?! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-15 07:49 -0400
                                                          Could you possibly be more grotesque ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 04:55 -0700
                                                            Re: Could you possibly be more grotesque ?! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-15 09:39 -0400
                                                          Re: You're gonna sue me for not liking my "ass rape" ?! Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-15 09:03 -0600
                                                          Re: You're gonna sue me for not liking my "ass rape" ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-16 06:08 +0000
                                                            Re: You're gonna sue me for not liking my "ass rape" ?! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-16 08:51 -0400
                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 10:48 -0400
                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-16 06:09 +0000
                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:08 -0400
                                                            Re: Every rapist ever. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-16 21:54 +0000
                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-16 17:08 -0500
                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 15:24 -0700
                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-16 17:42 -0500
                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 15:46 -0700
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-16 17:48 -0500
                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 16:15 -0700
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-16 17:08 -0600
                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 16:16 -0700
                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-16 17:08 -0600
                                                              Usenet is Superior. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-16 16:30 -0700
                                                                Re: Usenet is Superior. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 17:07 -0700
                                                                Re: Usenet is Superior. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 01:02 +0000
                                                                Re: Usenet is Superior. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-17 13:06 +0000
                                                                  Re: Usenet is Superior. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 09:35 -0500
                                                                    Re: Usenet is Superior. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 09:05 -0600
                                                                    Re: Usenet is Superior. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 11:46 -0700
                                                                  Re: Usenet is Superior. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 11:45 -0700
                                                                    Re: Usenet is Superior. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:08 -0600
                                                                      Re: Usenet is Superior. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:15 +0000
                                                                Re: Usenet is Superior. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 10:40 -0400
                                                            Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:09 +0000
                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:02 -0400
                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-17 16:50 +0000
                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 09:56 -0700
                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:04 -0700
                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:29 -0400
                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 12:04 -0600
                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:15 -0700
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 12:40 -0600
                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:41 -0700
                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 18:58 +0000
                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:08 -0600
                                                                            Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 14:59 -0600
                                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:21 -0600
                                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:30 -0600
                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 18:55 +0000
                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:56 -0700
                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:06 -0600
                                                                    Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Every rapist ever. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 14:18 -0500
                                                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Every rapist ever. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:24 -0600
                                                                        Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Every rapist ever. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 14:33 -0500
                                                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflak Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:06 -0600
                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:10 -0700
                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:13 -0600
                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-17 23:20 +0000
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 16:22 -0700
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Joe <emailoptional@deathstar.org> - 2018-09-17 19:27 -0400
                                                                      Trump is guilty of possessing a dick; unforgivable. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-17 19:37 -0700
                                                                        Re: Trump is guilty of possessing a dick; unforgivable. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:08 -0400
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 20:36 -0700
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:05 -0400
                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:51 -0400
                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-17 23:36 +0000
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 19:36 -0700
                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 07:13 +0000
                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-18 13:22 -0700
                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-18 09:47 +0100
                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:39 -0700
                                                                            Re: Every rapist ever. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-18 21:12 +0100
                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-18 13:23 -0700
                                                                      Kensi and Nadegda are today's left wing, "Nazi" collectivists. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-17 19:53 -0700
                                                                        Re: Kensi and Nadegda are today's left wing, "Nazi" collectivists. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 07:14 +0000
                                                                          Fascism ( fasc(io), bundle ) is collectivism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-18 01:01 -0700
                                                                            Re: Fascism ( fasc(io), bundle ) is collectivism. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-18 09:01 +0000
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 06:49 -0500
                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:39 -0700
                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 00:47 +0000
                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 17:56 -0700
                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:31 -0400
                                                                            Re: Every rapist ever. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 07:16 -0500
                                                                            Re: Every rapist ever. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 12:29 +0000
                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 07:11 +0000
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 01:15 -0700
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:15 -0400
                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:19 -0400
                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:53 -0600
                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:23 -0700
                                                                            Re: Every rapist ever. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 12:38 +0000
                                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 07:49 -0700
                                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:43 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:58 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 10:40 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-21 20:42 +0100
                                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:20 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:50 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 16:25 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 18:16 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:30 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 10:59 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-22 05:11 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 18:43 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:42 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:34 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:47 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:19 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:15 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 10:40 -0700
                                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:11 -0600
                                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 12:43 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:35 +0000
                                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:36 -0400
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:50 -0600
                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 11:44 -0700
                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:12 +0000
                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:14 -0600
                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:18 +0000
                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:25 -0600
                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:31 +0000
                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:04 -0600
                                                                            Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 07:15 +0000
                                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:51 -0600
                                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:32 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:18 -0600
                                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:33 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:37 -0600
                                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:10 -0400
                                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:26 -0600
                                                                                            Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:47 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:19 -0600
                                                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:40 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-20 16:14 +0100
                                                                                                  Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0600
                                                                                                    Re: Every rapist ever. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 12:26 -0400
                                                                                                      Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:35 -0600
                                                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:14 +0000
                                                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:19 -0600
                                                                                                            Re: Every rapist ever. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:27 +0000
                                                                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:21 -0600
                                                                                                          Re: Every rapist ever. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:26 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: Every rapist ever. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-20 23:16 +0100
                                                              Re: Every rapist ever. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:20 -0700
                                                                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Every rapist ever. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 14:22 -0500
                                                                  Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:26 +0000
                                                                    Re: ҝ„ Snowflake ҝ„ҝ„ Snowflake ҝ„ҝ„ Snowflake ҝ„ҝ„ Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 14:37 -0500
                                                                      Re: ҝÂ? Snowflake ҝÂ?ҝÂ? Snowflake ҝÂ?ҝÂ? Snowflake ҝÂ?ҝÂ? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:01 -0600
                                                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:45 -0700
                                                                      Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 14:48 -0500
                                                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:02 -0600
                                                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-21 11:24 -0500
                                                                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:25 -0400
                                                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
                                                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:37 +0000
                                                                            Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:18 -0400
                                                                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-22 09:24 -0500
                                                                    Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:58 -0400
                                                                      Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 07:25 +0000
                                                                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:51 -0600
                                                                        Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:37 -0700
                                                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sno<SMACKAKOOK!> Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:01 -0600
                                                                  Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Every rapist ever. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:27 -0700
                                                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Every rapist ever. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 14:56 -0600
                                                                    Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Every rapist ever. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 16:02 -0500
                                                                Re: Every rapist ever. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 14:55 -0600
                                              Re: The rapist. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-15 11:14 +0100
                                                Re: The rapist. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-15 06:25 -0400
                                                  Re: The rapist. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-15 17:23 +0100
                                                    Re: The rapist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-16 06:12 +0000
                                                      Re: The rapist. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-16 13:26 +0100
                                                        Re: The rapist. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-16 08:54 -0400
                                                          Re: The rapist. tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-09-16 14:13 +0100
                                                            Re: The rapist. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-16 09:38 -0400
                                                              Re: The rapist. tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-09-16 15:00 +0100
                                                          Re: The rapist. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:14 -0400
                                                      Re: The rapist. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:10 -0400
                                                        Re: The rapist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:12 +0000
                                                          Re: The rapist. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:03 -0400
                                                            Re: The rapist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 18:59 +0000
                                                              Re: The rapist. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:10 -0600
                                                              Re: The rapist. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:52 -0400
                                                                Re: The rapist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 07:28 +0000
                                                                  Re: The rapist. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:38 -0700
                                                          Re: The rapist. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:21 -0700
                                              Re: The rapist. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-15 09:01 -0600
                                                Re: The rapist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-16 06:12 +0000
                                  Great societies aren't built on robbery/guns. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-14 13:24 -0700
                          Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 08:26 -0600
                            Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 12:13 -0500
                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 11:16 -0600
                                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 12:31 -0500
                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 12:13 -0600
                    Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 13:17 -0700
                Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 15:07 -0600
                  Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-13 13:04 +0000
                    Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-13 08:13 -0600
                      Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-13 15:01 +0000
                        Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-13 09:46 -0600
                          Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-13 14:02 -0500
                            Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 08:24 -0600
                              Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 10:20 -0500
                                Re: ? Snowfl Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 11:04 -0600
                                  Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowfl ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 12:19 -0500
                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Sno Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 11:26 -0600
                                      Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Sno ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 13:03 -0500
                                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 12:15 -0600
                                          Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 13:24 -0500
                                            Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 17:14 -0600
                                  Re: ? Snowfl mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-14 13:43 -0400
                                    Re: ? Snowfl Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 12:14 -0600
                                      Re: ? Snowfl mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-14 14:30 -0400
                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Bollocks snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-14 20:45 +0100
                        Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 12:02 -0400
                          Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-13 17:47 +0100
                            Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 08:19 -0600
                              Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-14 09:43 -0500
                                Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 09:03 -0600
                                Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 21:41 -0700
                                  List the pros and cons of global warming. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 00:16 -0700
                                    Re: List the pros and cons of global warming. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 00:52 -0700
                                      Are you a used car salesman or a scientist ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-15 01:14 -0700
                                        Re: Are you a used car salesman or a scientist ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 01:45 -0700
                          Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 13:20 -0700
                      Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-13 12:21 -0500
                        Re: ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 08:23 -0600
                          Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 10:42 -0500
                            Re: ? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 11:07 -0600
                              Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 12:23 -0500
                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 11:30 -0600
                                  Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 13:22 -0500
                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Cuntishness snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-14 20:52 +0100
                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Cuntishness Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 14:57 -0500
                                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Cuntishness Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 17:17 -0600
                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Cuntishness Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 17:17 -0600
                                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Cuntishness snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-15 00:25 +0100
                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Cuntishness Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 17:32 -0600
                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Cuntishness snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-15 00:50 +0100
                                        Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Cuntishness ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-14 18:32 -0500
                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Cuntishness ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 17:35 -0600
                                            Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-15 04:32 +0000
                                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-15 06:05 -0400
                                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-15 09:31 -0400
                                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 11:47 -0700
                                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-15 12:52 -0600
                                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 11:53 -0700
                                                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-15 14:00 -0500
                                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 12:06 -0700
                                                            Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-15 14:19 -0500
                                                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-15 14:58 -0500
                                                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-15 15:05 -0500
                                                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-15 22:10 +0100
                                                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-15 19:37 -0500
                                                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-16 13:32 +0100
                                                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-15 22:40 +0100
                                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? (skeeter getting spanked) Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-15 09:06 -0600
                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 17:16 -0600
                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-15 04:29 +0000
                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Prolate Spheroids snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-14 20:49 +0100
                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Prolate Spheroids Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 17:18 -0600
                    Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 13:17 -0700
                    Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-14 00:05 +0000
                      Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 17:09 -0700
                      Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 08:27 -0600
                        Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-15 04:33 +0000
                          Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 22:54 -0600
                            Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-15 09:29 -0400
            Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 11:59 -0600
            Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-12 16:58 -0700
        Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-12 06:53 -0700
          Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-12 18:56 -0400
            Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-12 17:05 -0700
              Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-20 00:51 -0500
            Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-13 00:20 +0000
              Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 10:29 -0700
            Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-13 13:57 +0000
              Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 12:28 -0700
              Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-13 13:18 -0700
                Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 08:26 -0600
              Re: If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-14 00:09 +0000

Page 22 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 20 21 [22] 23 24 … 26  Next page →


#204173

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-09-13 13:04 +0000
Message-ID<AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>
In reply to#203928
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>> I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and "misogynist" attacks because
>> they are founded on absolutely nothing. I get along with everyone who
>> genuinely wants to get along and it's always been that way with me.
>> 
>> 
> Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you then you
> automaticly become a racist and sexist and fascist.
> 
> Oh and Nazi.

I have to admit that just saying something slightly positive about Trump 
_or_ not disagreeding entirely with everything that comes out of his 
mouth is enough to be labelled a Nazi around here.

-- 
SilverSlimer
FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
Absolute centrist, proud Catholic

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204191

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-13 08:13 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.36041e7781f0224f98983d@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#204173
In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
> 
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
> > In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
> >> I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and "misogynist" attacks because
> >> they are founded on absolutely nothing. I get along with everyone who
> >> genuinely wants to get along and it's always been that way with me.
> >> 
> >> 
> > Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you then you
> > automaticly become a racist and sexist and fascist.
> > 
> > Oh and Nazi.
> 
> I have to admit that just saying something slightly positive about Trump 
> _or_ not disagreeding entirely with everything that comes out of his 
> mouth is enough to be labelled a Nazi around here.

I didn't even know I was all that until I met Kensi/Nads.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204204

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-09-13 15:01 +0000
Message-ID<uZumD.43554$8r2.10047@fx34.iad>
In reply to#204191
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>> 
>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> 
>> > In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>> >> I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and "misogynist" attacks
>> >> because they are founded on absolutely nothing. I get along with
>> >> everyone who genuinely wants to get along and it's always been that
>> >> way with me.
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> > Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you then you
>> > automaticly become a racist and sexist and fascist.
>> > 
>> > Oh and Nazi.
>> 
>> I have to admit that just saying something slightly positive about
>> Trump _or_ not disagreeding entirely with everything that comes out of
>> his mouth is enough to be labelled a Nazi around here.
> 
> I didn't even know I was all that until I met Kensi/Nads.

I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first people to 
suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War - a Nazi. 

I think that most people have now dismissed the whole "you're a racist, 
you're a fascist, you're a Nazi" garbage as mental illness by the extreme 
left. Luckily for us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with 
some leaning left and others leaning right.

-- 
SilverSlimer
FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
Absolute centrist, proud Catholic

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204220

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-13 09:46 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.3604342fa3600d64989841@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#204204
In article <uZumD.43554$8r2.10047@fx34.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
> 
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
> > In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
> >> 
> >> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >> 
> >> > In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
> >> >> I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and "misogynist" attacks
> >> >> because they are founded on absolutely nothing. I get along with
> >> >> everyone who genuinely wants to get along and it's always been that
> >> >> way with me.
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> > Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you then you
> >> > automaticly become a racist and sexist and fascist.
> >> > 
> >> > Oh and Nazi.
> >> 
> >> I have to admit that just saying something slightly positive about
> >> Trump _or_ not disagreeding entirely with everything that comes out of
> >> his mouth is enough to be labelled a Nazi around here.
> > 
> > I didn't even know I was all that until I met Kensi/Nads.
> 
> I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first people to 
> suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War - a Nazi. 
> 
> I think that most people have now dismissed the whole "you're a racist, 
> you're a fascist, you're a Nazi" garbage as mental illness by the extreme 
> left. Luckily for us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with 
> some leaning left and others leaning right.

As far as I'm concerned when some says I am privileged because I am 
white? That's a racist statement.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204262 — Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-13 14:02 -0500
SubjectRe: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄
Message-ID<4ZqdneSSxamhKQfGnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#204220
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:46:14 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
<skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<MPG.3604342fa3600d64989841@reader.albasani.net>:
 
>In article <uZumD.43554$8r2.10047@fx34.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>>On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote: 
>>>In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote: 
>>>>>In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>>>>>>I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and "misogynist" attacks because 
>>>>>>they are founded on absolutely nothing. I get along with everyone who
>>>>>>genuinely wants to get along and it's always been that way with me. 
>>>>>Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you then you
>>>>>automaticly become a racist and sexist and fascist. Oh and Nazi.
>>>>I have to admit that just saying something slightly positive about Trump
>>>>_or_ not disagreeding entirely with everything that comes out of his
>>>>mouth is enough to be labelled a Nazi around here.
>>>I didn't even know I was all that until I met Kensi/Nads.
>>I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first people to
>>suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War - a Nazi. I think that 
>>most people have now dismissed the whole "you're a racist, you're a
>>fascist, you're a Nazi" garbage as mental illness by the extreme left. 
>>Luckily for us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with some
>>leaning left and others leaning right.
>
>As far as I'm concerned when some says I am privileged because I am
>white? That's a racist statement.

nobody said it's your fault that you lived your whole life in a racist and sexist society that values "whiteness" and "maleness" as preferential.

only a complete dumbfuck would take it personally when someone points out that such attitudes obviously benefit all white males and make life that much easier for them.

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204429 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-14 08:24 -0600
SubjectRe: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?
Message-ID<MPG.360572843217c86398984d@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#204262
In article <4ZqdneSSxamhKQfGnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> 
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:46:14 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <MPG.3604342fa3600d64989841@reader.albasani.net>:
>  
> >In article <uZumD.43554$8r2.10047@fx34.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
> >>On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote: 
> >>>In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
> >>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote: 
> >>>>>In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
> >>>>>>I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and "misogynist" attacks because 
> >>>>>>they are founded on absolutely nothing. I get along with everyone who
> >>>>>>genuinely wants to get along and it's always been that way with me. 
> >>>>>Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you then you
> >>>>>automaticly become a racist and sexist and fascist. Oh and Nazi.
> >>>>I have to admit that just saying something slightly positive about Trump
> >>>>_or_ not disagreeding entirely with everything that comes out of his
> >>>>mouth is enough to be labelled a Nazi around here.
> >>>I didn't even know I was all that until I met Kensi/Nads.
> >>I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first people to
> >>suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War - a Nazi. I think that 
> >>most people have now dismissed the whole "you're a racist, you're a
> >>fascist, you're a Nazi" garbage as mental illness by the extreme left. 
> >>Luckily for us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with some
> >>leaning left and others leaning right.
> >
> >As far as I'm concerned when some says I am privileged because I am
> >white? That's a racist statement.
> 
> nobody said it's your fault that you lived your whole life in a racist and sexist society that values "whiteness" and "maleness" as preferential.
> 
> only a complete dumbfuck would take it personally when someone points out that such attitudes obviously benefit all white males and make life that much easier for them.

What a line of crap. I never got any special treatment because I am 
white.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204475 — Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-14 10:20 -0500
SubjectRe: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? If you need to lose all of your money, and your sanity... ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄
Message-ID<6-2dnSyCIP4hTAbGnZ2dnUU7-fXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#204429
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:24:25 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
<skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<MPG.360572843217c86398984d@reader.albasani.net>:
 
>In article <4ZqdneSSxamhKQfGnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
>127.0.0.1 says...
>>On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:46:14 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
>>News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
>><skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>><MPG.3604342fa3600d64989841@reader.albasani.net>: 
>>>In article <uZumD.43554$8r2.10047@fx34.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>>>>On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote: 
>>>>>In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>>>>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote: 
>>>>>>>In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>>>>>>>>I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and "misogynist" attacks because 
>>>>>>>>they are founded on absolutely nothing. I get along with everyone who
>>>>>>>>genuinely wants to get along and it's always been that way with me. 
>>>>>>>Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you then you
>>>>>>>automaticly become a racist and sexist and fascist. Oh and Nazi.
>>>>>>I have to admit that just saying something slightly positive about Trump
>>>>>>_or_ not disagreeding entirely with everything that comes out of his
>>>>>>mouth is enough to be labelled a Nazi around here.
>>>>>I didn't even know I was all that until I met Kensi/Nads.
>>>>I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first people to
>>>>suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War - a Nazi. I think that 
>>>>most people have now dismissed the whole "you're a racist, you're a
>>>>fascist, you're a Nazi" garbage as mental illness by the extreme left. 
>>>>Luckily for us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with some
>>>>leaning left and others leaning right.
>>>As far as I'm concerned when some says I am privileged because I am
>>>white? That's a racist statement.
>>nobody said it's your fault that you lived your whole life in a racist
>>and sexist society that values "whiteness" and "maleness" as
>>preferential. only a complete dumbfuck would take it personally when
>>someone points out that such attitudes obviously benefit all white
>>males and make life that much easier for them.
>
>What a line of crap. I never got any special treatment because I am
>white.

sure you did: by other whites who treat whites better than others.  you also got special treatment because you were male.  that you're either too stupid to realize it or too "proud" to admit it changes nothing.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/white-privilege-iq-test-5-questions_us_57d90ad6e4b0d93d17700de7

QUESTION 1

True or False: The average black family today is much closer in reaching the level of wealth possessed by the average white family than the average black family was in the 1930s.

ANSWER 1

False. It’s not even close. The gap has ballooned exponentially from what it was in the 1930s and 40s, when white wealth was three and four times black wealth. Today it is reported to be an incredible multiple of 13 times, according to Inequality.org, based on the latest Pew Research data. 

But, it is actually even worse when calculated correctly! 

The Pew data includes consumable goods owned by black families, such as vehicles, furniture, televisions and even appliances. NOBODY in America should count their TVs and refrigerators as part of their net worth wealth assets. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which defines net worth to determine an β€œaccredited investor,” won’t even allow the home you live in to count as part of its net worth equation. When durable goods are removed from the net worth calculation (which they ought to be according to New York University Professor Edward Wolff, one of America’s foremost economists studying wealth inequality), the actual wealth gap is abysmally striking. 

White wealth is 70 times black wealth in America today. That is much worse than the economic conditions were in South Africa at the height of Apartheid.  

  

FACT CHECKFor most of US history, keeping blacks poor was a key objective of American public and private sector policy. The current status of black wealth in Americaβ€”and mass incarceration, among other thingsβ€”is a testament to the success of these systemic policies and practices.
 
For three centuries, structural racism had prevented black families from building wealth. School systems, hiring practices, red-lining, and discriminatory lending practices all combined to deny the opportunities that white Americans, whether immigrant or native born, saw as their birthright.

The Wealth gap between white and black households in the US today surpasses that of Apartheid-era South Africa. According to Wolff’s calculations, the median black family is actually only worth $1,700 when you deduct durable goods. In contrast, the median white family holds $116,800 of wealth using the same accounting methods. Black household wealth, Wolff adds, actually fell during the Great Recession from $6,700 to $1,700. In South Africa, during the height of apartheid atrocities, the median black family held about 7 percent of typical white South African family net worth. Today, using Wolff’s analysis, the median African American family holds a mere 1.5 percent of median white American family wealth.

QUESTION 2

True or False: Black Americans have just as much educational opportunity today as white Americans. 

ANSWER 2

The answer is false. Public schools were established on a foundation of white supremacy. Black students were relegated to schools that were designed by policy and practice to be of lower quality with fewer funds and resources. Political and legal battles finally made their way to the Supreme Court in 1954. Following the famous Brown v Board of Education ruling to desegregate, initial steps were taken to integrate schools during the 1950s and 60s, often with extreme measures taken, including use of law enforcement and the military, to address the white-hot hostile backlash. Those early efforts to integrate schools were eventually defeated. 

The Atlantic reported in a Nov. 2013 article, titled, β€œWhy Are American Schools Still Segregated?” 

In the 1968-69 school year, when the U.S. Department of Education started to enforce Brown, about 77 percent of black students and 55 percent of Latino students attended public schools that were more than half-minority. By the 2009-2010 school year, the picture wasn’t much better for black students, and it was far worse for Latinos: 74 percent of black students and 80 percent of Latino students went to schools that were more than half-minority. More than 40 percent of black and Latino students attended schools that were 90 percent to 100 percent minority.”
The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) reveals that a significant obstacle preventing progress in the integration of public schools is historical ignorance (which is a benefit of white privilege). In an article titled, β€œWhy Our Schools Are Segregated,” published in it May 2013, Volume 70, Number 8 edition, ASCD states:

Social and economic disadvantageβ€”not only poverty, but also a host of associated conditionsβ€”depresses student performance. Concentrating students with these disadvantages in racially and economically homogeneous schools depresses it even further.
Our ability to remedy this situation by integrating schools is hobbled by historical ignorance. Too quickly forgetting 20th-century history, we’ve persuaded ourselves that the residential isolation of low-income black children occurs in practice but is not government-ordained. We think residential segregation is but an accident of economic circumstance, personal preference, and private discrimination.
However, residential segregation is actually the result of racially motivated law, public policy, and government-sponsored discrimination. The result of state action, residential segregation reflects an ongoing and blatant constitutional violation that calls for explicit remedy.

The Atlantic followed up on the issue of school segregation in its March 1, 2016 article, β€œSeparate and Still Unequal.”

In a modern-day tale of two cities, in virtually every major U.S. metropolitan area students of color are much more likely than whites to attend public schools shaped by high concentrations of poverty, an analysis of federal data has found.
In all but five of the 95 largest cities by population for which data is available, more minority than white students attend public schools where most of their classmates qualify as poor or low-income, according to the analysis of data from the National Equity Atlas. In a full three-fourths of cities, the share of minority students attending mostly poor or low-income schools is at least 20 percentage points greater than the share of white students. In 29 of the cities, the gap is at least 40 percentage points.
Across a wide range of cities, the numbers point to a massive racial imbalance in exposure to concentrated poverty. In St. Louis, 92 percent of black, but only 27 percent of white, students attend schools where most of their classmates qualify as poor or low-income. In Dallas, 38 percent of white, compared to 95 percent of black and 97 percent of Latino students, attend mostly low-income schools. In Los Angeles, the numbers are 49 percent for whites, 85 percent for African Americans, and 96 percent for Latinos.
This year, The Atlantic has continued to target the issue of education segregation city by city, in places like Little Rock, Arkansas where 60 years of efforts to integrate schools have failed, and Brooklyn, New York, where school segregation persists largely as a result of long-term segregated communities designed by systemic policies of redlining regions, and Cleveland, Mississippi where a federal judge is still trying to force a school district that was actually sued in 1965 for its racist policies to comply with laws that have remained unenforced for generations. 

WHITE PRIVILEGE SUSTAINED BY EDUCATED CLASS

This issue of segregation in public schools can’t be relegated to uneducated blue collar workers trumpeting the mantra of β€œMake America Great Again,” as major media have framed the political support for presidential candidate Donald Trump. School segregation is deeply embedded in the hostile attitudes of millions of educated, middle-class and wealthy, white Americans. These are the policymakers who determine the fate of those children struggling outside of the bubble of white privilege.

Black and Hispanic children suffer the outcomes of decisions made by white parents, teachers, principals, superintendents, policymakers, investors, business owners and real estate developers. These ordinary otherwise wonderful white Americans represent a predominant opposition to constant efforts being made to ensure low-income students born to minority parents have at least an equal footing in the tax-funded education system. 

Thus far, white supremacists have claimed victories all across America, many decades after defying the 1954 Supreme Court ruling Brown v Board of Education.  And with the financial ability to uproot and move to established suburban white enclaves or build their own white Utopia almost anywhere, privileged white Americans have clearly indicated there’s little hope that segregation in America’s schools will change for decades to come. And that’s an exercise of both privilege and power.

FACT CHECK 

Segregated schools with poorly performing students can rarely be turned around while remaining racially isolated. The problems students bring to school are so overwhelming that policy should never assume that even the most skilled and dedicated faculty can overcome them. Although schools can make a difference, they cannot erase the damage caused by concentrated poverty and racial isolation.
 
By 1988, the percentage of black children in white schools in the south had risen from zero to nearly 44 percent. But, a spate of lawsuits filed by the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, and a 1991 Supreme Court decision releasing districts from such orders helped erode that progress. By 2011, the percentage of black students in majority white schools was 23.2 percent β€” slightly lower than it was in 1968. 

The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia expressed his viewpoint in Dec. 2015 that black students fared better when enrolled in β€œslower” and β€œless-advanced” schools, thereby continuing a long history of white supremacist mindset that regards black students as less capable.

β€œThere are those who contend that it does not benefit African-Americans to get them into the University of Texas where they do not do well, as opposed to having them go to a less-advanced school, a slower-track school where they do well.” (The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia)
The numbers of high-poverty schools increased from 12 percent at the turn of the millennium to 17 percent in 2007-2008, according to the Department of Education. Of the total number of secondary schools, 9 percent are considered high-poverty (2,142 secondary schools) with enrollment of one million mostly minority students. The vast majority of these schools are considered part and parcel of the β€œdropout factoriesβ€œ spoken of by education leaders. 

QUESTION 3

True or False: The higher unemployment rate for Black Americans is largely due to lower education achievement, not public and private sector discrimination policies and practices. 

ANSWER 3

The answer is false. There are two primary considerations: 

The rate of unemployment for black Americans in the workforce is nearly double the rate of unemployment for white Americans every year consistently, dating back as far as the data allows.
Regardless of education levels achieved, unemployment among black Americans remains nearly twice as high as white Americans with the same level of education.
FACT CHECK

Even when they hold the same degree, African Americans are much more likely to be looking for a job than white Americans

The black unemployment rate is nearly or more than twice the white unemployment rate regardless of educational attainment. It is, and always has been, about twice the white unemployment rate.

β€œOne of the problems is that we continue to have a tale of two economies,” says Imara Jones, an economist and writer. β€œ[The improvement] is mostly true for people who are white, have good educations, and are tied to those sectors that are flourishing in the global economy. And then we have the economy of everyone else that has been left out and left behind.”
 
Fear of dredging up presumed past racial problems seems to prevent deep public discourse and analysis on why nearly all jobs in America are still being produced by just one racial demographic group. When analysts look for reasons why black and Hispanic Americans have greater difficulties in finding employment, it stands to reason they should take a good look at the fact that an overwhelming amount of the companies that own and control the means to hire workers are headed by white males. This hasn’t changed much throughout history despite numerous efforts to disrupt the pattern. 

The entire history of struggles in America to extend equal opportunities to others has always been a battle to persuade a preponderance of powerful white males to live up to the creed that presumably serves as a guidepost for American society. 

I believe in the United States of America as a government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed, a democracy in a republic, a sovereign Nation of many sovereign States; a perfect union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes.
I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it, to support its Constitution, to obey its laws, to respect its flag, and to defend it against all enemies.
William Tyler Page (Accepted into the House of Representative on April 3, 1918)

QUESTION 4

True or False: Black males are over-represented in America’s prisons when compared with their presence in the nation’s general population.  

ANSWER 4

The answer is true. Data from the NAACP reveal that nearly one million of 2.3 million inmates incarcerated are black Americans. As of June 2016, the Federal Bureau of Prisons data also show that black Americans are nearly 38% of its inmate population. 

And PrisonPolicy.org data reflect a per capita imprisonment rate of black Americans of more than 2,200 per 100,000 compared to a mere 380 per 100,000 for white Americans. 

But the issue is more complicated than it seems on the surface. Any cursory look into the issue will find Bryan Stevenson, founder of the Alabama-based Equal Justice Initiative. Stevenson is one of America’s most eloquent and insightful voices on the issues of incarceration history, patterns, causes and effects. 

VIOLENT INSTITUTIONAL HISTORY

One of the most striking indicators of systemic institutional bias in the criminal justice arena is the fact that the government has failed to ensure proper reporting and collection of data by police, jails and prisons regarding the number and frequency of assaults, injuries and deaths of people in custody, with accounting by race, age and gender. This egregious oversight masks the horrific history of policing in America, in particular its targeting of black Americans as white supremacists found a comfortable home in the ranks of police departments nationwide. 

Black Americans are not naturally more prone to criminal behavior than any other group of Americans. But critics rely on such belief to explain the inordinate outcomes. Critics often intentionally leave out details that provide a contextualized holistic portrait of an ugly American story of white hostility toward black Americans. 

Throughout the 148-year history of black America, decade by decade there have been systemic forces controlled by white males targeting black Americans, even criminalizing their presence in cities. One state, Oregon, even changed its constitution to outlaw black people, and refused to officially ratify the 14th amendment until 1973.

The power to criminalize ordinary human behavior and create outlaws of every child based solely on the color of their skin is a power unique to white American males.

Today, most white Americans don’t know their own history of hostility against black peoples, preferring to dismiss any references to it as ancient history. And critics suggest that whatever happened long ago magically disappeared, doesn’t exist today, and had no lingering consequences. 

The reality is this story is one that tells a tale of an unbroken string of systemic institutional hostilities that have impacted every generation of black Americans. From Black Codes, Pig Laws, Sundown Laws, and Convict Leasing to modern-day disparate sentencing for non-violent offenses, disparate and abusive policing, economic strangulation and β€œghettoization” of communities and artificial drug influx trafficked by the government into black neighborhoods.

Critics who charge black Americans as instruments of their own demise seek to absolve white America of its role in exacerbating and accelerating declines in black communities that have devastated generations of children and weighed heavily upon society as a whole. 

It is simply impossible, without sustained systemic interference, for black Americans to have survived 100 years of outright white hostilities in every corner of society and every aspect of life, from 1865 – 1965 (even sustaining a rate of near 80% intact families) and then suddenly unravel and devolve into an ever-worsening trajectory over the following 48 years. 

Meanwhile, the plain-sight reality is that government is doing little or nothing to address the epidemic of consequences of America’s long legacy of police brutality toward black Americans and extreme incarceration rates, widely regarded as β€œthe greatest threat to child well-being in the U.S.”

FACT CHECK

Today, there are 3 million black boys, ages 10-13 who have committed no crimes. Although the veracity of statistics is in dispute due to lack of official data-gathering since the 2001 data set, we know a minimum of 1 in 4 up to 1 in 3 black boys will go to jail in their lifetimes, most between the ages of 16 - 24. That means at least 750,000 up to 1 million of the innocent black boys in grades 5-7 today will likely go to prison in the next five years. And whether anyone can agree on the actual numbers, there is consensus that the number is extraordinarily high and represents a dire circumstance. Yet, there exists no national intervention policy to disrupt this inevitable outcome; and no presidential candidate has even addressed the issue! 

Each year, more than 600,000 inmates are released from prisons and directed to reside in economically distressed communities where they have extremely low opportunities to obtain livable wage incomes. They are ushered from one hostile environment into another, ill-prepared and ill-equipped to reenter a much different society than the one they left years prior. 

The revolving door prison system ensures that 84% of males, ages 24 and younger, will return to prison within five years. The policing of America at large is a national problem, with 30% of Americans reported to have arrest records. The Wall Street Journal suggest that figure may even be too low. The bottom line is that those involved in benefiting from this system are the last ones who should be placed in charge of finding solutions to disrupt it.

Black males are 21 times more likely to be shot by police than their white counterparts. 

QUESTION 5

True or False: With regard to intellect and work ethic, are black Americans less capable than white Americans? 

ANSWER 5

The answer is false. We’ll get to the rationale behind the answer shortly. Regardless of the facts, millions of white Americans spanning the spectrum of political ideologies believe that black Americans are β€œless intelligent,” β€œmore lazy,” β€œmore rude,” β€œmore violent,” and β€œmore criminal” than white Americans, according to a Reuters-Ipsos poll conducted in the spring and published in a summer 2016 report. And while many media have spun the results of the survey as evidence that supports a claim by Secretary Hillary Clinton that half of Donald Trump supporters can be lumped into a β€œbasket of deplorables,” the results clearly reveal that Clinton would need a much larger basket, because the β€œdeplorables” landscape is across the spectrum of political ideology, including among her own white supporters.

But there exists empirical data that prove black Americans do not fit the profiled perspectives of white respondents in the poll. Here’s how we know the perception by many white Americans regarding the work ethic of black Americans is misguided and steeped in the racism of white supremacy. 

One of the most prominent perspectives in America’s white-dominated private business sector is the idolized entrepreneurial tendencies of immigrants. The largest foundation in America focused on entrepreneurship is the Kauffman Foundation. It devotes an entire section of its website to Immigrant Entrepreneurship. In its report, The Economic Case for Welcoming Immigrant Entrepreneurs, it argues that US policy should consider the economic impact of such a hard-working class of people. Inc magazine magazine concurs.

Despite accounting for only about 13 percent of the population, immigrants now start more than a quarter of new businesses in this country. Fast-growing ones, tooβ€”more than 20 percent of the 2014 Inc. 500 CEOs are immigrants. Immigrant-owned businesses pay an estimated $126 billion in wages per year, employing 1 in 10 Americans who work for private companies. In 2010, immigrant-owned businesses generated more than $775 billion in sales. If immigrant America were a stock, you’d be an idiot not to buy it.
No one in the Reuters-Ipsos poll would classify immigrant entrepreneurs as lazy. Entrepreneurs are widely considered by white Americans to be the most creative, most innovative, hardest-working and highest risk-taking of all Americans. 

NOT LAZY: BLACK AMERICAN ENTREPRENEURS

However, little attention is paid to the fact that black Americans have one of the highest rates of consistent entrepreneurial growth. Particularly, black women business owners, who have grown at an astounding rate of 322% since 1997 and represent 60% of all black-owned businesses. Sadly, America’s public policy and private sector practices largely ignore the phenomenal efforts being made by black men and women entrepreneurs. The organic innovation occurring in the poorest communities in America happens daily because necessity breeds creativity and risk-taking. 

This extraordinarily high rate of entrepreneurial activity is occurring in black America without a national media spotlight, without adequate infrastructure, a dearth of entrepreneurial education and training, and minus much-needed resources and sufficient capital. 

Job-creation today remains overwhelmingly dominated by white males despite their declining activity. In fact, all of the 540 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategies (CEDS) plans in the country ignore investing in scaling up the growth of black entrepreneurship and including it in their strategic planning models, goals and outcomes. 

The result: As the white-dominated landscape of entrepreneurship and new business startups declines, the capacity of minority startup culture is limited in productivity output due to lack of infrastructure and resources that could be accessed through inclusion in regional economic competitiveness strategies and planning.  

Per capita, there are more entrepreneurs in black American communities than exist at all of the nation’s colleges and universities. This extraordinary activity is ignored by millions of white Americans who peer occasionally through the lens of privileged isolation at distant minority communities and see the struggles and challenges that reinforce their preconceived notions. 

They don’t see the trails of hard-working men and women whose startups, mature small businesses and corporations could be scaled up to produce greater output, new jobs and wealth. But without resources, training, mentoring and capital the explosion of entrepreneurial effort across black America produces little economic output and cannot be sustained or scaled. There must be a national economic competitiveness strategy for black and Hispanic Americans, just as there are economic competitiveness strategies blanketing the nation’s metro regions, albeit none include measurable productivity outcomes for communities of color. It is time for an Inclusive Competitiveness strategy.

Entrepreneurship is the American Dream. It is the primary pathway from poverty to prosperity. In a nation that promotes the myth of meritocracy and upward mobility, entrepreneurship is the real solution to America’s current crisis. 

Entrepreneurship is also the natural outcropping of seeding and cultivating crops of student innovators, like the ones produced by the Hawken Entrepreneurship School. This method of educating students should be mandatory and ingrained in all public schools in underserved communities nationwide. It ought not be reserved solely for the children of middle-class and wealthy parents.

FACT CHECK

The fastest-growing group of entrepreneurs in America: black women. 

Overall, women now own 30% of all businesses in the U.S., accounting for some 9.4 million firms. And African American women control 14% of these companies, or an estimated 1.3 million businesses. These businesses have added an estimated 340,000 jobs to the economy since 2007, while employment at companies owned by men (or with equally shared ownership) has declined.    

America must invest in cultivating a new crop of entrepreneurs. The crisis in entrepreneurship across the nation means fewer jobs are being created. Meanwhile, the Kauffman Foundation has long held the point that nearly all net new jobs are the product of fast-growing startups. And the fastest rate of growth in entrepreneurship in America is among black and Hispanic entrepreneurs. Yet, these innovators remain disconnected from an economic landscape of resources and investments that was built on a foundation of racism and white supremacy. When white Americans consider how future jobs will be created, there’s no thought to investing in scaling up the existing entrepreneurial activity occurring in minority communities.

The May 7, 2016 Wall Street Journal blog quoted from an MIT report on the crisis of entrepreneurship in America and then wondered what can be done?

β€œTo the extent that the current state of American entrepreneurship is facing a crisis, it is not in the rate of creation of high-growth potential startups or even in the initial funding of those firms, but instead in the potential of those firms to scale in a meaningful way over time,” the authors said.
β€œMuch more worrisome than the rate of creation of high-growth potential firms is the decline in the U.S. ability to accelerate the growth of new businesses conditional on initial quality…which has been falling since the late 1990s and only recently, and mildly, begun to recover. Even as the number of new ideas and potential for innovation is increasing, there seems to be a reduction in the ability of startups to scale in a meaningful and systematic way. Whether this is primarily a challenge for capital markets, or reflects systematic reductions in various aspects of ecosystem efficiency remains an important challenge for both future research and policy intervention.”
What’s to be done? The policy prescription isn’t entirely clear. For the innovative, potentially high-growth companies, the authors suggest efforts to help them scale up. But there doesn’t appear to be a single solution to meet the varying needs of an American entrepreneurial class that ranges from a small mom-and-pop shops to the next would-be Facebook.

There is something that can be done. But the solution doesn’t exist under the antiquated, obsolete exclusionary economic policies and practices of the past. The nation needs to adopt a new Inclusive Competitiveness strategy that empowers underrepresented Americans to improve their economic performance and compete in a knowledge-based, tech-driven globally competitive innovation economy. 

INCLUSIVE AMERICA

It is time for a transformation in the upcoming post-Obama era toward building the foundation for a 21st century Inclusive America. To do so, we will have to pierce the bubble of white privilege and permanently leave the past behind. The future of economic inclusion and global competitiveness of America relies on our acceptance of, investment in, and empowerment of all populations in our multicultural, multi-ethnic, multiracial society to reach their maximum potential as American citizens. 

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204491 — Re: ? Snowfl

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-14 11:04 -0600
SubjectRe: ? Snowfl
Message-ID<MPG.36059828b8a7900c989864@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#204475
In article <6-2dnSyCIP4hTAbGnZ2dnUU7-fXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> 
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:24:25 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <MPG.360572843217c86398984d@reader.albasani.net>:
>  
> >In article <4ZqdneSSxamhKQfGnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
> >127.0.0.1 says...
> >>On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:46:14 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> >>News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> >><skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> >><MPG.3604342fa3600d64989841@reader.albasani.net>: 
> >>>In article <uZumD.43554$8r2.10047@fx34.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
> >>>>On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote: 
> >>>>>In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
> >>>>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote: 
> >>>>>>>In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
> >>>>>>>>I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and "misogynist" attacks because 
> >>>>>>>>they are founded on absolutely nothing. I get along with everyone who
> >>>>>>>>genuinely wants to get along and it's always been that way with me. 
> >>>>>>>Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you then you
> >>>>>>>automaticly become a racist and sexist and fascist. Oh and Nazi.
> >>>>>>I have to admit that just saying something slightly positive about Trump
> >>>>>>_or_ not disagreeding entirely with everything that comes out of his
> >>>>>>mouth is enough to be labelled a Nazi around here.
> >>>>>I didn't even know I was all that until I met Kensi/Nads.
> >>>>I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first people to
> >>>>suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War - a Nazi. I think that 
> >>>>most people have now dismissed the whole "you're a racist, you're a
> >>>>fascist, you're a Nazi" garbage as mental illness by the extreme left. 
> >>>>Luckily for us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with some
> >>>>leaning left and others leaning right.
> >>>As far as I'm concerned when some says I am privileged because I am
> >>>white? That's a racist statement.
> >>nobody said it's your fault that you lived your whole life in a racist
> >>and sexist society that values "whiteness" and "maleness" as
> >>preferential. only a complete dumbfuck would take it personally when
> >>someone points out that such attitudes obviously benefit all white
> >>males and make life that much easier for them.
> >
> >What a line of crap. I never got any special treatment because I am
> >white.
> 
> sure you did: by other whites who treat whites better than others.  you also got special treatment because you were male.  that you're either too stupid to realize it or too "proud" to admit it changes nothing.
> 
> https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/white-privilege-iq-test-5-questions_us_57d90ad6e4b0d93d17700de7
> 
> QUESTION 1
> 
> True or False: The average black family today is much closer in reaching the level of wealth possessed by the average white family than the average black family was in the 1930s.
> 
> ANSWER 1
> 
> False. ItÒ€?s not even close. The gap has ballooned exponentially from what it was in the 1930s and 40s, when white wealth was three and four times black wealth. Today it is reported to be an incredible multiple of 13 times, according to Inequality.org, based on the latest Pew Research data. 
> 
> But, it is actually even worse when calculated correctly! 
> 
> The Pew data includes consumable goods owned by black families, such as vehicles, furniture, televisions and even appliances. NOBODY in America should count their TVs and refrigerators as part of their net worth wealth assets. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which defines net worth to determine an Ò€œaccredited investor,Ò€ wonÒ€?t even allow the home you live in to count as part of its net worth equation. When durable goods are removed from the net worth 
calculation (which they ought to be according to New York University Professor Edward Wolff, one of AmericaÒ€?s foremost economists studying wealth inequality), the actual wealth gap is abysmally striking. 
> 
> White wealth is 70 times black wealth in America today. That is much worse than the economic conditions were in South Africa at the height of Apartheid.  
> 
>   
> 
> FACT CHECKFor most of US history, keeping blacks poor was a key objective of American public and private sector policy. The current status of black wealth in AmericaÒ€?and mass incarceration, among other thingsÒ€?is a testament to the success of these systemic policies and practices.
>  
> For three centuries, structural racism had prevented black families from building wealth. School systems, hiring practices, red-lining, and discriminatory lending practices all combined to deny the opportunities that white Americans, whether immigrant or native born, saw as their birthright.
> 
> The Wealth gap between white and black households in the US today surpasses that of Apartheid-era South Africa. According to WolffÒ€?s calculations, the median black family is actually only worth $1,700 when you deduct durable goods. In contrast, the median white family holds $116,800 of wealth using the same accounting methods. Black household wealth, Wolff adds, actually fell during the Great Recession from $6,700 to $1,700. In South Africa, during the height of 
apartheid atrocities, the median black family held about 7 percent of typical white South African family net worth. Today, using WolffÒ€?s analysis, the median African American family holds a mere 1.5 percent of median white American family wealth.
> 
> QUESTION 2
> 
> True or False: Black Americans have just as much educational opportunity today as white Americans. 
> 
> ANSWER 2
> 
> The answer is false. Public schools were established on a foundation of white supremacy. Black students were relegated to schools that were designed by policy and practice to be of lower quality with fewer funds and resources. Political and legal battles finally made their way to the Supreme Court in 1954. Following the famous Brown v Board of Education ruling to desegregate, initial steps were taken to integrate schools during the 1950s and 60s, often with extreme 
measures taken, including use of law enforcement and the military, to address the white-hot hostile backlash. Those early efforts to integrate schools were eventually defeated. 
> 
> The Atlantic reported in a Nov. 2013 article, titled, Ò€œWhy Are American Schools Still Segregated?Ò€ 
> 
> In the 1968-69 school year, when the U.S. Department of Education started to enforce Brown, about 77 percent of black students and 55 percent of Latino students attended public schools that were more than half-minority. By the 2009-2010 school year, the picture wasnÒ€?t much better for black students, and it was far worse for Latinos: 74 percent of black students and 80 percent of Latino students went to schools that were more than half-minority. More than 40 percent of 
black and Latino students attended schools that were 90 percent to 100 percent minority.Ò€
> The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) reveals that a significant obstacle preventing progress in the integration of public schools is historical ignorance (which is a benefit of white privilege). In an article titled, Ò€œWhy Our Schools Are Segregated,Ò€ published in it May 2013, Volume 70, Number 8 edition, ASCD states:
> 
> Social and economic disadvantageÒ€?not only poverty, but also a host of associated conditionsÒ€?depresses student performance. Concentrating students with these disadvantages in racially and economically homogeneous schools depresses it even further.
> Our ability to remedy this situation by integrating schools is hobbled by historical ignorance. Too quickly forgetting 20th-century history, weÒ€?ve persuaded ourselves that the residential isolation of low-income black children occurs in practice but is not government-ordained. We think residential segregation is but an accident of economic circumstance, personal preference, and private discrimination.
> However, residential segregation is actually the result of racially motivated law, public policy, and government-sponsored discrimination. The result of state action, residential segregation reflects an ongoing and blatant constitutional violation that calls for explicit remedy.
> 
> The Atlantic followed up on the issue of school segregation in its March 1, 2016 article, Ò€œSeparate and Still Unequal.Ò€
> 
> In a modern-day tale of two cities, in virtually every major U.S. metropolitan area students of color are much more likely than whites to attend public schools shaped by high concentrations of poverty, an analysis of federal data has found.
> In all but five of the 95 largest cities by population for which data is available, more minority than white students attend public schools where most of their classmates qualify as poor or low-income, according to the analysis of data from the National Equity Atlas. In a full three-fourths of cities, the share of minority students attending mostly poor or low-income schools is at least 20 percentage points greater than the share of white students. In 29 of the cities, 
the gap is at least 40 percentage points.
> Across a wide range of cities, the numbers point to a massive racial imbalance in exposure to concentrated poverty. In St. Louis, 92 percent of black, but only 27 percent of white, students attend schools where most of their classmates qualify as poor or low-income. In Dallas, 38 percent of white, compared to 95 percent of black and 97 percent of Latino students, attend mostly low-income schools. In Los Angeles, the numbers are 49 percent for whites, 85 percent for 
African Americans, and 96 percent for Latinos.
> This year, The Atlantic has continued to target the issue of education segregation city by city, in places like Little Rock, Arkansas where 60 years of efforts to integrate schools have failed, and Brooklyn, New York, where school segregation persists largely as a result of long-term segregated communities designed by systemic policies of redlining regions, and Cleveland, Mississippi where a federal judge is still trying to force a school district that was actually sued 
in 1965 for its racist policies to comply with laws that have remained unenforced for generations. 
> 
> WHITE PRIVILEGE SUSTAINED BY EDUCATED CLASS
> 
> This issue of segregation in public schools canÒ€?t be relegated to uneducated blue collar workers trumpeting the mantra of Ò€œMake America Great Again,Ò€ as major media have framed the political support for presidential candidate Donald Trump. School segregation is deeply embedded in the hostile attitudes of millions of educated, middle-class and wealthy, white Americans. These are the policymakers who determine the fate of those children struggling outside of the 
bubble of white privilege.
> 
> Black and Hispanic children suffer the outcomes of decisions made by white parents, teachers, principals, superintendents, policymakers, investors, business owners and real estate developers. These ordinary otherwise wonderful white Americans represent a predominant opposition to constant efforts being made to ensure low-income students born to minority parents have at least an equal footing in the tax-funded education system. 
> 
> Thus far, white supremacists have claimed victories all across America, many decades after defying the 1954 Supreme Court ruling Brown v Board of Education.  And with the financial ability to uproot and move to established suburban white enclaves or build their own white Utopia almost anywhere, privileged white Americans have clearly indicated thereÒ€?s little hope that segregation in AmericaÒ€?s schools will change for decades to come. And thatÒ€?s an exercise of both 
privilege and power.
> 
> FACT CHECK 
> 
> Segregated schools with poorly performing students can rarely be turned around while remaining racially isolated. The problems students bring to school are so overwhelming that policy should never assume that even the most skilled and dedicated faculty can overcome them. Although schools can make a difference, they cannot erase the damage caused by concentrated poverty and racial isolation.
>  
> By 1988, the percentage of black children in white schools in the south had risen from zero to nearly 44 percent. But, a spate of lawsuits filed by the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, and a 1991 Supreme Court decision releasing districts from such orders helped erode that progress. By 2011, the percentage of black students in majority white schools was 23.2 percent Ò€? slightly lower than it was in 1968. 
> 
> The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia expressed his viewpoint in Dec. 2015 that black students fared better when enrolled in Ò€œslowerÒ€ and Ò€œless-advancedÒ€ schools, thereby continuing a long history of white supremacist mindset that regards black students as less capable.
> 
> Ò€œThere are those who contend that it does not benefit African-Americans to get them into the University of Texas where they do not do well, as opposed to having them go to a less-advanced school, a slower-track school where they do well.Ò€ (The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia)
> The numbers of high-poverty schools increased from 12 percent at the turn of the millennium to 17 percent in 2007-2008, according to the Department of Education. Of the total number of secondary schools, 9 percent are considered high-poverty (2,142 secondary schools) with enrollment of one million mostly minority students. The vast majority of these schools are considered part and parcel of the Ò€œdropout factoriesÒ€œ spoken of by education leaders. 
> 
> QUESTION 3
> 
> True or False: The higher unemployment rate for Black Americans is largely due to lower education achievement, not public and private sector discrimination policies and practices. 
> 
> ANSWER 3
> 
> The answer is false. There are two primary considerations: 
> 
> The rate of unemployment for black Americans in the workforce is nearly double the rate of unemployment for white Americans every year consistently, dating back as far as the data allows.
> Regardless of education levels achieved, unemployment among black Americans remains nearly twice as high as white Americans with the same level of education.
> FACT CHECK
> 
> Even when they hold the same degree, African Americans are much more likely to be looking for a job than white Americans
> 
> The black unemployment rate is nearly or more than twice the white unemployment rate regardless of educational attainment. It is, and always has been, about twice the white unemployment rate.
> 
> Ò€œOne of the problems is that we continue to have a tale of two economies,Ò€ says Imara Jones, an economist and writer. Ò€œ[The improvement] is mostly true for people who are white, have good educations, and are tied to those sectors that are flourishing in the global economy. And then we have the economy of everyone else that has been left out and left behind.Ò€
>  
> Fear of dredging up presumed past racial problems seems to prevent deep public discourse and analysis on why nearly all jobs in America are still being produced by just one racial demographic group. When analysts look for reasons why black and Hispanic Americans have greater difficulties in finding employment, it stands to reason they should take a good look at the fact that an overwhelming amount of the companies that own and control the means to hire workers are 
headed by white males. This hasnÒ€?t changed much throughout history despite numerous efforts to disrupt the pattern. 
> 
> The entire history of struggles in America to extend equal opportunities to others has always been a battle to persuade a preponderance of powerful white males to live up to the creed that presumably serves as a guidepost for American society. 
> 
> I believe in the United States of America as a government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed, a democracy in a republic, a sovereign Nation of many sovereign States; a perfect union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes.
> I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it, to support its Constitution, to obey its laws, to respect its flag, and to defend it against all enemies.
> William Tyler Page (Accepted into the House of Representative on April 3, 1918)
> 
> QUESTION 4
> 
> True or False: Black males are over-represented in AmericaÒ€?s prisons when compared with their presence in the nationÒ€?s general population.  
> 
> ANSWER 4
> 
> The answer is true. Data from the NAACP reveal that nearly one million of 2.3 million inmates incarcerated are black Americans. As of June 2016, the Federal Bureau of Prisons data also show that black Americans are nearly 38% of its inmate population. 
> 
> And PrisonPolicy.org data reflect a per capita imprisonment rate of black Americans of more than 2,200 per 100,000 compared to a mere 380 per 100,000 for white Americans. 
> 
> But the issue is more complicated than it seems on the surface. Any cursory look into the issue will find Bryan Stevenson, founder of the Alabama-based Equal Justice Initiative. Stevenson is one of AmericaÒ€?s most eloquent and insightful voices on the issues of incarceration history, patterns, causes and effects. 
> 
> VIOLENT INSTITUTIONAL HISTORY
> 
> One of the most striking indicators of systemic institutional bias in the criminal justice arena is the fact that the government has failed to ensure proper reporting and collection of data by police, jails and prisons regarding the number and frequency of assaults, injuries and deaths of people in custody, with accounting by race, age and gender. This egregious oversight masks the horrific history of policing in America, in particular its targeting of black Americans 
as white supremacists found a comfortable home in the ranks of police departments nationwide. 
> 
> Black Americans are not naturally more prone to criminal behavior than any other group of Americans. But critics rely on such belief to explain the inordinate outcomes. Critics often intentionally leave out details that provide a contextualized holistic portrait of an ugly American story of white hostility toward black Americans. 
> 
> Throughout the 148-year history of black America, decade by decade there have been systemic forces controlled by white males targeting black Americans, even criminalizing their presence in cities. One state, Oregon, even changed its constitution to outlaw black people, and refused to officially ratify the 14th amendment until 1973.
> 
> The power to criminalize ordinary human behavior and create outlaws of every child based solely on the color of their skin is a power unique to white American males.
> 
> Today, most white Americans donÒ€?t know their own history of hostility against black peoples, preferring to dismiss any references to it as ancient history. And critics suggest that whatever happened long ago magically disappeared, doesnÒ€?t exist today, and had no lingering consequences. 
> 
> The reality is this story is one that tells a tale of an unbroken string of systemic institutional hostilities that have impacted every generation of black Americans. From Black Codes, Pig Laws, Sundown Laws, and Convict Leasing to modern-day disparate sentencing for non-violent offenses, disparate and abusive policing, economic strangulation and Ò€œghettoizationÒ€ of communities and artificial drug influx trafficked by the government into black neighborhoods.
> 
> Critics who charge black Americans as instruments of their own demise seek to absolve white America of its role in exacerbating and accelerating declines in black communities that have devastated generations of children and weighed heavily upon society as a whole. 
> 
> It is simply impossible, without sustained systemic interference, for black Americans to have survived 100 years of outright white hostilities in every corner of society and every aspect of life, from 1865 Ò€? 1965 (even sustaining a rate of near 80% intact families) and then suddenly unravel and devolve into an ever-worsening trajectory over the following 48 years. 
> 
> Meanwhile, the plain-sight reality is that government is doing little or nothing to address the epidemic of consequences of AmericaÒ€?s long legacy of police brutality toward black Americans and extreme incarceration rates, widely regarded as Ò€œthe greatest threat to child well-being in the U.S.Ò€
> 
> FACT CHECK
> 
> Today, there are 3 million black boys, ages 10-13 who have committed no crimes. Although the veracity of statistics is in dispute due to lack of official data-gathering since the 2001 data set, we know a minimum of 1 in 4 up to 1 in 3 black boys will go to jail in their lifetimes, most between the ages of 16 - 24. That means at least 750,000 up to 1 million of the innocent black boys in grades 5-7 today will likely go to prison in the next five years. And whether anyone 
can agree on the actual numbers, there is consensus that the number is extraordinarily high and represents a dire circumstance. Yet, there exists no national intervention policy to disrupt this inevitable outcome; and no presidential candidate has even addressed the issue! 
> 
> Each year, more than 600,000 inmates are released from prisons and directed to reside in economically distressed communities where they have extremely low opportunities to obtain livable wage incomes. They are ushered from one hostile environment into another, ill-prepared and ill-equipped to reenter a much different society than the one they left years prior. 
> 
> The revolving door prison system ensures that 84% of males, ages 24 and younger, will return to prison within five years. The policing of America at large is a national problem, with 30% of Americans reported to have arrest records. The Wall Street Journal suggest that figure may even be too low. The bottom line is that those involved in benefiting from this system are the last ones who should be placed in charge of finding solutions to disrupt it.
> 
> Black males are 21 times more likely to be shot by police than their white counterparts. 
> 
> QUESTION 5
> 
> True or False: With regard to intellect and work ethic, are black Americans less capable than white Americans? 
> 
> ANSWER 5
> 
> The answer is false. WeÒ€?ll get to the rationale behind the answer shortly. Regardless of the facts, millions of white Americans spanning the spectrum of political ideologies believe that black Americans are Ò€œless intelligent,Ò€ Ò€œmore lazy,Ò€ Ò€œmore rude,Ò€ Ò€œmore violent,Ò€ and Ò€œmore criminalÒ€ than white Americans, according to a Reuters-Ipsos poll conducted in the spring and published in a summer 2016 report. And while many media have spun the results 
of the survey as evidence that supports a claim by Secretary Hillary Clinton that half of Donald Trump supporters can be lumped into a Ò€œbasket of deplorables,Ò€ the results clearly reveal that Clinton would need a much larger basket, because the Ò€œdeplorablesÒ€ landscape is across the spectrum of political ideology, including among her own white supporters.
> 
> But there exists empirical data that prove black Americans do not fit the profiled perspectives of white respondents in the poll. HereÒ€?s how we know the perception by many white Americans regarding the work ethic of black Americans is misguided and steeped in the racism of white supremacy. 
> 
> One of the most prominent perspectives in AmericaÒ€?s white-dominated private business sector is the idolized entrepreneurial tendencies of immigrants. The largest foundation in America focused on entrepreneurship is the Kauffman Foundation. It devotes an entire section of its website to Immigrant Entrepreneurship. In its report, The Economic Case for Welcoming Immigrant Entrepreneurs, it argues that US policy should consider the economic impact of such a hard-working 
class of people. Inc magazine magazine concurs.
> 
> Despite accounting for only about 13 percent of the population, immigrants now start more than a quarter of new businesses in this country. Fast-growing ones, tooÒ€?more than 20 percent of the 2014 Inc. 500 CEOs are immigrants. Immigrant-owned businesses pay an estimated $126 billion in wages per year, employing 1 in 10 Americans who work for private companies. In 2010, immigrant-owned businesses generated more than $775 billion in sales. If immigrant America were a 
stock, youÒ€?d be an idiot not to buy it.
> No one in the Reuters-Ipsos poll would classify immigrant entrepreneurs as lazy. Entrepreneurs are widely considered by white Americans to be the most creative, most innovative, hardest-working and highest risk-taking of all Americans. 
> 
> NOT LAZY: BLACK AMERICAN ENTREPRENEURS
> 
> However, little attention is paid to the fact that black Americans have one of the highest rates of consistent entrepreneurial growth. Particularly, black women business owners, who have grown at an astounding rate of 322% since 1997 and represent 60% of all black-owned businesses. Sadly, AmericaÒ€?s public policy and private sector practices largely ignore the phenomenal efforts being made by black men and women entrepreneurs. The organic innovation occurring in the 
poorest communities in America happens daily because necessity breeds creativity and risk-taking. 
> 
> This extraordinarily high rate of entrepreneurial activity is occurring in black America without a national media spotlight, without adequate infrastructure, a dearth of entrepreneurial education and training, and minus much-needed resources and sufficient capital. 
> 
> Job-creation today remains overwhelmingly dominated by white males despite their declining activity. In fact, all of the 540 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategies (CEDS) plans in the country ignore investing in scaling up the growth of black entrepreneurship and including it in their strategic planning models, goals and outcomes. 
> 
> The result: As the white-dominated landscape of entrepreneurship and new business startups declines, the capacity of minority startup culture is limited in productivity output due to lack of infrastructure and resources that could be accessed through inclusion in regional economic competitiveness strategies and planning.  
> 
> Per capita, there are more entrepreneurs in black American communities than exist at all of the nationÒ€?s colleges and universities. This extraordinary activity is ignored by millions of white Americans who peer occasionally through the lens of privileged isolation at distant minority communities and see the struggles and challenges that reinforce their preconceived notions. 
> 
> They donÒ€?t see the trails of hard-working men and women whose startups, mature small businesses and corporations could be scaled up to produce greater output, new jobs and wealth. But without resources, training, mentoring and capital the explosion of entrepreneurial effort across black America produces little economic output and cannot be sustained or scaled. There must be a national economic competitiveness strategy for black and Hispanic Americans, just as there 
are economic competitiveness strategies blanketing the nationÒ€?s metro regions, albeit none include measurable productivity outcomes for communities of color. It is time for an Inclusive Competitiveness strategy.
> 
> Entrepreneurship is the American Dream. It is the primary pathway from poverty to prosperity. In a nation that promotes the myth of meritocracy and upward mobility, entrepreneurship is the real solution to AmericaÒ€?s current crisis. 
> 
> Entrepreneurship is also the natural outcropping of seeding and cultivating crops of student innovators, like the ones produced by the Hawken Entrepreneurship School. This method of educating students should be mandatory and ingrained in all public schools in underserved communities nationwide. It ought not be reserved solely for the children of middle-class and wealthy parents.
> 
> FACT CHECK
> 
> The fastest-growing group of entrepreneurs in America: black women. 
> 
> Overall, women now own 30% of all businesses in the U.S., accounting for some 9.4 million firms. And African American women control 14% of these companies, or an estimated 1.3 million businesses. These businesses have added an estimated 340,000 jobs to the economy since 2007, while employment at companies owned by men (or with equally shared ownership) has declined.    
> 
> America must invest in cultivating a new crop of entrepreneurs. The crisis in entrepreneurship across the nation means fewer jobs are being created. Meanwhile, the Kauffman Foundation has long held the point that nearly all net new jobs are the product of fast-growing startups. And the fastest rate of growth in entrepreneurship in America is among black and Hispanic entrepreneurs. Yet, these innovators remain disconnected from an economic landscape of resources and 
investments that was built on a foundation of racism and white supremacy. When white Americans consider how future jobs will be created, thereÒ€?s no thought to investing in scaling up the existing entrepreneurial activity occurring in minority communities.
> 
> The May 7, 2016 Wall Street Journal blog quoted from an MIT report on the crisis of entrepreneurship in America and then wondered what can be done?
> 
> Ò€œTo the extent that the current state of American entrepreneurship is facing a crisis, it is not in the rate of creation of high-growth potential startups or even in the initial funding of those firms, but instead in the potential of those firms to scale in a meaningful way over time,Ò€ the authors said.
> Ò€œMuch more worrisome than the rate of creation of high-growth potential firms is the decline in the U.S. ability to accelerate the growth of new businesses conditional on initial qualityÒ€?which has been falling since the late 1990s and only recently, and mildly, begun to recover. Even as the number of new ideas and potential for innovation is increasing, there seems to be a reduction in the ability of startups to scale in a meaningful and systematic way. Whether this 
is primarily a challenge for capital markets, or reflects systematic reductions in various aspects of ecosystem efficiency remains an important challenge for both future research and policy intervention.Ò€
> WhatÒ€?s to be done? The policy prescription isnÒ€?t entirely clear. For the innovative, potentially high-growth companies, the authors suggest efforts to help them scale up. But there doesnÒ€?t appear to be a single solution to meet the varying needs of an American entrepreneurial class that ranges from a small mom-and-pop shops to the next would-be Facebook.
> 
> There is something that can be done. But the solution doesnÒ€?t exist under the antiquated, obsolete exclusionary economic policies and practices of the past. The nation needs to adopt a new Inclusive Competitiveness strategy that empowers underrepresented Americans to improve their economic performance and compete in a knowledge-based, tech-driven globally competitive innovation economy. 
> 
> INCLUSIVE AMERICA
> 
> It is time for a transformation in the upcoming post-Obama era toward building the foundation for a 21st century Inclusive America. To do so, we will have to pierce the bubble of white privilege and permanently leave the past behind. The future of economic inclusion and global competitiveness of America relies on our acceptance of, investment in, and empowerment of all populations in our multicultural, multi-ethnic, multiracial society to reach their maximum potential 
as American citizens. 

I won't let the "huffington post" dictate how I lived. It's all liberal 
bullshit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204503 — Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowfl ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-14 12:19 -0500
SubjectRe: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowfl ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄
Message-ID<oI6dncHoJtQEcAbGnZ2dnUU7-cXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#204491
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:04:57 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
<skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<MPG.36059828b8a7900c989864@reader.albasani.net>:
 
>In article <6-2dnSyCIP4hTAbGnZ2dnUU7-fXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
>127.0.0.1 says...
>>On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:24:25 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
>>News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
>><skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>><MPG.360572843217c86398984d@reader.albasani.net>: 
>>>In article <4ZqdneSSxamhKQfGnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
>>>127.0.0.1 says...
>>>>On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:46:14 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
>>>>News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
>>>><skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
>>>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>>>><MPG.3604342fa3600d64989841@reader.albasani.net>: 
>>>>>In article <uZumD.43554$8r2.10047@fx34.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>>>>>>On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote: 
>>>>>>>In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>>>>>>>>>>I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and "misogynist" attacks because 
>>>>>>>>>>they are founded on absolutely nothing. I get along with everyone who
>>>>>>>>>>genuinely wants to get along and it's always been that way with me. 
>>>>>>>>>Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you then you
>>>>>>>>>automaticly become a racist and sexist and fascist. Oh and Nazi.
>>>>>>>>I have to admit that just saying something slightly positive about Trump
>>>>>>>>_or_ not disagreeding entirely with everything that comes out of his
>>>>>>>>mouth is enough to be labelled a Nazi around here.
>>>>>>>I didn't even know I was all that until I met Kensi/Nads.
>>>>>>I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first people to
>>>>>>suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War - a Nazi. I think that 
>>>>>>most people have now dismissed the whole "you're a racist, you're a
>>>>>>fascist, you're a Nazi" garbage as mental illness by the extreme left. 
>>>>>>Luckily for us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with some
>>>>>>leaning left and others leaning right.
>>>>>As far as I'm concerned when some says I am privileged because I am
>>>>>white? That's a racist statement.
>>>>nobody said it's your fault that you lived your whole life in a racist
>>>>and sexist society that values "whiteness" and "maleness" as
>>>>preferential. only a complete dumbfuck would take it personally when
>>>>someone points out that such attitudes obviously benefit all white
>>>>males and make life that much easier for them.
>>>What a line of crap. I never got any special treatment because I am
>>>white.
>>sure you did: by other whites who treat whites better than others.  you 
>>also got special treatment because you were male.  that you're either
>>too stupid to realize it or too "proud" to admit it changes nothing.
>>https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/white-privilege-iq-test-5-question
>>s_us_57d90ad6e4b0d93d17700de7 QUESTION 1 True or False: The average
>>black family today is much closer in reaching the level of wealth
>>possessed by the average white family than the average black family was
>>in the 1930s. ANSWER 1 False. ItÒ€?s not even close. The gap has
>>ballooned exponentially from what it was in the 1930s and 40s, when
>>white wealth was three and four times black wealth. Today it is
>>reported to be an incredible multiple of 13 times, according to
>>Inequality.org, based on the latest Pew Research data. But, it is
>>actually even worse when calculated correctly! The Pew data includes
>>consumable goods owned by black families, such as vehicles, furniture, 
>>televisions and even appliances. NOBODY in America should count their
>>TVs and refrigerators as part of their net worth wealth assets. The
>>Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which defines net worth to
>>determine an Ò€œaccredited investor,Ò€ wonÒ€?t even allow
>>the home you live in to count as part of its net worth equation. When
>>durable goods are removed from the net worth 
>calculation (which they ought to be according to New York University
>Professor Edward Wolff, one of AmericaÒ€?s foremost economists
>studying wealth inequality), the actual wealth gap is abysmally
>striking. 
>>White wealth is 70 times black wealth in America today. That is much
>>worse than the economic conditions were in South Africa at the height
>>of Apartheid.    FACT CHECKFor most of US history, keeping blacks poor 
>>was a key objective of American public and private sector policy. The
>>current status of black wealth in AmericaÒ€?and mass incarceration, 
>>among other thingsÒ€?is a testament to the success of these systemic 
>>policies and practices. For three centuries, structural racism had
>>prevented black families from building wealth. School systems, hiring
>>practices, red-lining, and discriminatory lending practices all
>>combined to deny the opportunities that white Americans, whether
>>immigrant or native born, saw as their birthright. The Wealth gap
>>between white and black households in the US today surpasses that of
>>Apartheid-era South Africa. According to WolffÒ€?s calculations, the
>>median black family is actually only worth $1,700 when you deduct
>>durable goods. In contrast, the median white family holds $116,800 of
>>wealth using the same accounting methods. Black household wealth, Wolff
>>adds, actually fell during the Great Recession from $6,700 to $1,700.
>>In South Africa, during the height of 
>apartheid atrocities, the median black family held about 7 percent of
>typical white South African family net worth. Today, using WolffÒ€?s
>analysis, the median African American family holds a mere 1.5 percent
>of median white American family wealth.
>>QUESTION 2 True or False: Black Americans have just as much educational 
>>opportunity today as white Americans. ANSWER 2 The answer is false.
>>Public schools were established on a foundation of white supremacy.
>>Black students were relegated to schools that were designed by policy
>>and practice to be of lower quality with fewer funds and resources.
>>Political and legal battles finally made their way to the Supreme Court
>>in 1954. Following the famous Brown v Board of Education ruling to
>>desegregate, initial steps were taken to integrate schools during the
>>1950s and 60s, often with extreme 
>measures taken, including use of law enforcement and the military, to
>address the white-hot hostile backlash. Those early efforts to
>integrate schools were eventually defeated. 
>>The Atlantic reported in a Nov. 2013 article, titled, Ò€œWhy Are
>>American Schools Still Segregated?Ò€ In the 1968-69 school year,
>>when the U.S. Department of Education started to enforce Brown, about
>>77 percent of black students and 55 percent of Latino students attended
>>public schools that were more than half-minority. By the 2009-2010
>>school year, the picture wasnÒ€?t much better for black students,
>>and it was far worse for Latinos: 74 percent of black students and 80
>>percent of Latino students went to schools that were more than
>>half-minority. More than 40 percent of 
>black and Latino students attended schools that were 90 percent to 100
>percent minority.Ò€
>>The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)
>>reveals that a significant obstacle preventing progress in the
>>integration of public schools is historical ignorance (which is a
>>benefit of white privilege). In an article titled, Ò€œWhy Our
>>Schools Are Segregated,Ò€ published in it May 2013, Volume 70,
>>Number 8 edition, ASCD states: Social and economic
>>disadvantageÒ€?not only poverty, but also a host of associated
>>conditionsÒ€?depresses student performance. Concentrating students
>>with these disadvantages in racially and economically homogeneous
>>schools depresses it even further. Our ability to remedy this situation
>>by integrating schools is hobbled by historical ignorance. Too quickly 
>>forgetting 20th-century history, weÒ€?ve persuaded ourselves that the
>>residential isolation of low-income black children occurs in practice
>>but is not government-ordained. We think residential segregation is but
>>an accident of economic circumstance, personal preference, and private 
>>discrimination. However, residential segregation is actually the result 
>>of racially motivated law, public policy, and government-sponsored
>>discrimination. The result of state action, residential segregation
>>reflects an ongoing and blatant constitutional violation that calls for
>>explicit remedy. The Atlantic followed up on the issue of school
>>segregation in its March 1, 2016 article, Ò€œSeparate and Still
>>Unequal.Ò€ In a modern-day tale of two cities, in virtually every 
>>major U.S. metropolitan area students of color are much more likely than
>>whites to attend public schools shaped by high concentrations of
>>poverty, an analysis of federal data has found. In all but five of the 
>>95 largest cities by population for which data is available, more
>>minority than white students attend public schools where most of their 
>>classmates qualify as poor or low-income, according to the analysis of
>>data from the National Equity Atlas. In a full three-fourths of cities,
>>the share of minority students attending mostly poor or low-income
>>schools is at least 20 percentage points greater than the share of
>>white students. In 29 of the cities, 
>the gap is at least 40 percentage points.
>>Across a wide range of cities, the numbers point to a massive racial
>>imbalance in exposure to concentrated poverty. In St. Louis, 92 percent
>>of black, but only 27 percent of white, students attend schools where
>>most of their classmates qualify as poor or low-income. In Dallas, 38
>>percent of white, compared to 95 percent of black and 97 percent of
>>Latino students, attend mostly low-income schools. In Los Angeles, the 
>>numbers are 49 percent for whites, 85 percent for 
>African Americans, and 96 percent for Latinos.
>>This year, The Atlantic has continued to target the issue of education
>>segregation city by city, in places like Little Rock, Arkansas where 60
>>years of efforts to integrate schools have failed, and Brooklyn, New
>>York, where school segregation persists largely as a result of
>>long-term segregated communities designed by systemic policies of
>>redlining regions, and Cleveland, Mississippi where a federal judge is 
>>still trying to force a school district that was actually sued 
>in 1965 for its racist policies to comply with laws that have remained
>unenforced for generations. 
>>WHITE PRIVILEGE SUSTAINED BY EDUCATED CLASS This issue of segregation in
>>public schools canÒ€?t be relegated to uneducated blue collar
>>workers trumpeting the mantra of Ò€œMake America Great
>>Again,Ò€ as major media have framed the political support for
>>presidential candidate Donald Trump. School segregation is deeply
>>embedded in the hostile attitudes of millions of educated, middle-class
>>and wealthy, white Americans. These are the policymakers who determine 
>>the fate of those children struggling outside of the 
>bubble of white privilege.
>>Black and Hispanic children suffer the outcomes of decisions made by
>>white parents, teachers, principals, superintendents, policymakers,
>>investors, business owners and real estate developers. These ordinary
>>otherwise wonderful white Americans represent a predominant opposition 
>>to constant efforts being made to ensure low-income students born to
>>minority parents have at least an equal footing in the tax-funded
>>education system. Thus far, white supremacists have claimed victories
>>all across America, many decades after defying the 1954 Supreme Court
>>ruling Brown v Board of Education.  And with the financial ability to
>>uproot and move to established suburban white enclaves or build their
>>own white Utopia almost anywhere, privileged white Americans have
>>clearly indicated thereÒ€?s little hope that segregation in
>>AmericaÒ€?s schools will change for decades to come. And thatÒ€?s
>>an exercise of both 
>privilege and power.
>>FACT CHECK Segregated schools with poorly performing students can rarely
>>be turned around while remaining racially isolated. The problems
>>students bring to school are so overwhelming that policy should never
>>assume that even the most skilled and dedicated faculty can overcome
>>them. Although schools can make a difference, they cannot erase the
>>damage caused by concentrated poverty and racial isolation. By 1988,
>>the percentage of black children in white schools in the south had
>>risen from zero to nearly 44 percent. But, a spate of lawsuits filed by
>>the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, and a 1991 Supreme
>>Court decision releasing districts from such orders helped erode that
>>progress. By 2011, the percentage of black students in majority white
>>schools was 23.2 percent Ò€? slightly lower than it was in 1968. The
>>late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia expressed his viewpoint in
>>Dec. 2015 that black students fared better when enrolled in
>>Ò€œslowerÒ€ and Ò€œless-advancedÒ€ schools, thereby
>>continuing a long history of white supremacist mindset that regards
>>black students as less capable. Ò€œThere are those who contend that
>>it does not benefit African-Americans to get them into the University
>>of Texas where they do not do well, as opposed to having them go to a
>>less-advanced school, a slower-track school where they do well.Ò€ 
>>(The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia) The numbers of
>>high-poverty schools increased from 12 percent at the turn of the
>>millennium to 17 percent in 2007-2008, according to the Department of
>>Education. Of the total number of secondary schools, 9 percent are
>>considered high-poverty (2,142 secondary schools) with enrollment of
>>one million mostly minority students. The vast majority of these
>>schools are considered part and parcel of the Ò€œdropout
>>factoriesÒ€œ spoken of by education leaders. QUESTION 3 True or
>>False: The higher unemployment rate for Black Americans is largely due 
>>to lower education achievement, not public and private sector
>>discrimination policies and practices. ANSWER 3 The answer is false.
>>There are two primary considerations: The rate of unemployment for
>>black Americans in the workforce is nearly double the rate of
>>unemployment for white Americans every year consistently, dating back
>>as far as the data allows. Regardless of education levels achieved,
>>unemployment among black Americans remains nearly twice as high as
>>white Americans with the same level of education. FACT CHECK Even when 
>>they hold the same degree, African Americans are much more likely to be 
>>looking for a job than white Americans The black unemployment rate is
>>nearly or more than twice the white unemployment rate regardless of
>>educational attainment. It is, and always has been, about twice the
>>white unemployment rate. Ò€œOne of the problems is that we continue
>>to have a tale of two economies,Ò€ says Imara Jones, an economist 
>>and writer. Ò€œ[The improvement] is mostly true for people who are
>>white, have good educations, and are tied to those sectors that are
>>flourishing in the global economy. And then we have the economy of
>>everyone else that has been left out and left behind.Ò€ Fear of
>>dredging up presumed past racial problems seems to prevent deep public 
>>discourse and analysis on why nearly all jobs in America are still being
>>produced by just one racial demographic group. When analysts look for
>>reasons why black and Hispanic Americans have greater difficulties in
>>finding employment, it stands to reason they should take a good look at
>>the fact that an overwhelming amount of the companies that own and
>>control the means to hire workers are 
>headed by white males. This hasnÒ€?t changed much throughout history 
>despite numerous efforts to disrupt the pattern. 
>>The entire history of struggles in America to extend equal opportunities
>>to others has always been a battle to persuade a preponderance of
>>powerful white males to live up to the creed that presumably serves as 
>>a guidepost for American society. I believe in the United States of
>>America as a government of the people, by the people, for the people;
>>whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed, a
>>democracy in a republic, a sovereign Nation of many sovereign States; a
>>perfect union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles
>>of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for which American patriots
>>sacrificed their lives and fortunes. I therefore believe it is my duty 
>>to my country to love it, to support its Constitution, to obey its laws,
>>to respect its flag, and to defend it against all enemies. William
>>Tyler Page (Accepted into the House of Representative on April 3, 1918)
>>QUESTION 4 True or False: Black males are over-represented in
>>AmericaÒ€?s prisons when compared with their presence in the
>>nationÒ€?s general population.  ANSWER 4 The answer is true. Data
>>from the NAACP reveal that nearly one million of 2.3 million inmates
>>incarcerated are black Americans. As of June 2016, the Federal Bureau
>>of Prisons data also show that black Americans are nearly 38% of its
>>inmate population. And PrisonPolicy.org data reflect a per capita
>>imprisonment rate of black Americans of more than 2,200 per 100,000
>>compared to a mere 380 per 100,000 for white Americans. But the issue
>>is more complicated than it seems on the surface. Any cursory look into
>>the issue will find Bryan Stevenson, founder of the Alabama-based Equal
>>Justice Initiative. Stevenson is one of AmericaÒ€?s most eloquent
>>and insightful voices on the issues of incarceration history, patterns,
>>causes and effects. VIOLENT INSTITUTIONAL HISTORY One of the most
>>striking indicators of systemic institutional bias in the criminal
>>justice arena is the fact that the government has failed to ensure
>>proper reporting and collection of data by police, jails and prisons
>>regarding the number and frequency of assaults, injuries and deaths of 
>>people in custody, with accounting by race, age and gender. This
>>egregious oversight masks the horrific history of policing in America, 
>>in particular its targeting of black Americans 
>as white supremacists found a comfortable home in the ranks of police
>departments nationwide. 
>>Black Americans are not naturally more prone to criminal behavior than
>>any other group of Americans. But critics rely on such belief to
>>explain the inordinate outcomes. Critics often intentionally leave out 
>>details that provide a contextualized holistic portrait of an ugly
>>American story of white hostility toward black Americans. Throughout
>>the 148-year history of black America, decade by decade there have been
>>systemic forces controlled by white males targeting black Americans,
>>even criminalizing their presence in cities. One state, Oregon, even
>>changed its constitution to outlaw black people, and refused to
>>officially ratify the 14th amendment until 1973. The power to
>>criminalize ordinary human behavior and create outlaws of every child
>>based solely on the color of their skin is a power unique to white
>>American males. Today, most white Americans donÒ€?t know their own
>>history of hostility against black peoples, preferring to dismiss any
>>references to it as ancient history. And critics suggest that whatever 
>>happened long ago magically disappeared, doesnÒ€?t exist today, and
>>had no lingering consequences. The reality is this story is one that
>>tells a tale of an unbroken string of systemic institutional
>>hostilities that have impacted every generation of black Americans.
>>From Black Codes, Pig Laws, Sundown Laws, and Convict Leasing to
>>modern-day disparate sentencing for non-violent offenses, disparate and
>>abusive policing, economic strangulation and
>>Ò€œghettoizationÒ€ of communities and artificial drug influx
>>trafficked by the government into black neighborhoods. Critics who
>>charge black Americans as instruments of their own demise seek to
>>absolve white America of its role in exacerbating and accelerating
>>declines in black communities that have devastated generations of
>>children and weighed heavily upon society as a whole. It is simply
>>impossible, without sustained systemic interference, for black
>>Americans to have survived 100 years of outright white hostilities in
>>every corner of society and every aspect of life, from 1865 Ò€? 1965
>>(even sustaining a rate of near 80% intact families) and then suddenly 
>>unravel and devolve into an ever-worsening trajectory over the following
>>48 years. Meanwhile, the plain-sight reality is that government is
>>doing little or nothing to address the epidemic of consequences of
>>AmericaÒ€?s long legacy of police brutality toward black Americans
>>and extreme incarceration rates, widely regarded as Ò€œthe greatest
>>threat to child well-being in the U.S.Ò€ FACT CHECK Today, there
>>are 3 million black boys, ages 10-13 who have committed no crimes.
>>Although the veracity of statistics is in dispute due to lack of
>>official data-gathering since the 2001 data set, we know a minimum of 1
>>in 4 up to 1 in 3 black boys will go to jail in their lifetimes, most
>>between the ages of 16 - 24. That means at least 750,000 up to 1
>>million of the innocent black boys in grades 5-7 today will likely go
>>to prison in the next five years. And whether anyone 
>can agree on the actual numbers, there is consensus that the number is
>extraordinarily high and represents a dire circumstance. Yet, there
>exists no national intervention policy to disrupt this inevitable
>outcome; and no presidential candidate has even addressed the issue! 
>>Each year, more than 600,000 inmates are released from prisons and
>>directed to reside in economically distressed communities where they
>>have extremely low opportunities to obtain livable wage incomes. They
>>are ushered from one hostile environment into another, ill-prepared and
>>ill-equipped to reenter a much different society than the one they left
>>years prior. The revolving door prison system ensures that 84% of
>>males, ages 24 and younger, will return to prison within five years.
>>The policing of America at large is a national problem, with 30% of
>>Americans reported to have arrest records. The Wall Street Journal
>>suggest that figure may even be too low. The bottom line is that those 
>>involved in benefiting from this system are the last ones who should be 
>>placed in charge of finding solutions to disrupt it. Black males are 21 
>>times more likely to be shot by police than their white counterparts.
>>QUESTION 5 True or False: With regard to intellect and work ethic, are 
>>black Americans less capable than white Americans? ANSWER 5 The answer
>>is false. WeÒ€?ll get to the rationale behind the answer shortly.
>>Regardless of the facts, millions of white Americans spanning the
>>spectrum of political ideologies believe that black Americans are
>>Ò€œless intelligent,Ò€ Ò€œmore lazy,Ò€ Ò€œmore
>>rude,Ò€ Ò€œmore violent,Ò€ and Ò€œmore
>>criminalÒ€ than white Americans, according to a Reuters-Ipsos poll
>>conducted in the spring and published in a summer 2016 report. And
>>while many media have spun the results 
>of the survey as evidence that supports a claim by Secretary Hillary
>Clinton that half of Donald Trump supporters can be lumped into a
>Ò€œbasket of deplorables,Ò€ the results clearly reveal that
>Clinton would need a much larger basket, because the
>Ò€œdeplorablesÒ€ landscape is across the spectrum of political
>ideology, including among her own white supporters.
>>But there exists empirical data that prove black Americans do not fit
>>the profiled perspectives of white respondents in the poll. HereÒ€?s
>>how we know the perception by many white Americans regarding the work
>>ethic of black Americans is misguided and steeped in the racism of
>>white supremacy. One of the most prominent perspectives in
>>AmericaÒ€?s white-dominated private business sector is the idolized 
>>entrepreneurial tendencies of immigrants. The largest foundation in
>>America focused on entrepreneurship is the Kauffman Foundation. It
>>devotes an entire section of its website to Immigrant Entrepreneurship.
>>In its report, The Economic Case for Welcoming Immigrant Entrepreneurs,
>>it argues that US policy should consider the economic impact of such a 
>>hard-working 
>class of people. Inc magazine magazine concurs.
>>Despite accounting for only about 13 percent of the population,
>>immigrants now start more than a quarter of new businesses in this
>>country. Fast-growing ones, tooÒ€?more than 20 percent of the 2014
>>Inc. 500 CEOs are immigrants. Immigrant-owned businesses pay an
>>estimated $126 billion in wages per year, employing 1 in 10 Americans
>>who work for private companies. In 2010, immigrant-owned businesses
>>generated more than $775 billion in sales. If immigrant America were a 
>stock, youÒ€?d be an idiot not to buy it.
>>No one in the Reuters-Ipsos poll would classify immigrant entrepreneurs 
>>as lazy. Entrepreneurs are widely considered by white Americans to be
>>the most creative, most innovative, hardest-working and highest
>>risk-taking of all Americans. NOT LAZY: BLACK AMERICAN ENTREPRENEURS
>>However, little attention is paid to the fact that black Americans have
>>one of the highest rates of consistent entrepreneurial growth.
>>Particularly, black women business owners, who have grown at an
>>astounding rate of 322% since 1997 and represent 60% of all black-owned
>>businesses. Sadly, AmericaÒ€?s public policy and private sector
>>practices largely ignore the phenomenal efforts being made by black men
>>and women entrepreneurs. The organic innovation occurring in the 
>poorest communities in America happens daily because necessity breeds
>creativity and risk-taking. 
>>This extraordinarily high rate of entrepreneurial activity is occurring 
>>in black America without a national media spotlight, without adequate
>>infrastructure, a dearth of entrepreneurial education and training, and
>>minus much-needed resources and sufficient capital. Job-creation today 
>>remains overwhelmingly dominated by white males despite their declining 
>>activity. In fact, all of the 540 Comprehensive Economic Development
>>Strategies (CEDS) plans in the country ignore investing in scaling up
>>the growth of black entrepreneurship and including it in their
>>strategic planning models, goals and outcomes. The result: As the
>>white-dominated landscape of entrepreneurship and new business startups
>>declines, the capacity of minority startup culture is limited in
>>productivity output due to lack of infrastructure and resources that
>>could be accessed through inclusion in regional economic
>>competitiveness strategies and planning.  Per capita, there are more
>>entrepreneurs in black American communities than exist at all of the
>>nationÒ€?s colleges and universities. This extraordinary activity is
>>ignored by millions of white Americans who peer occasionally through
>>the lens of privileged isolation at distant minority communities and
>>see the struggles and challenges that reinforce their preconceived
>>notions. They donÒ€?t see the trails of hard-working men and women
>>whose startups, mature small businesses and corporations could be
>>scaled up to produce greater output, new jobs and wealth. But without
>>resources, training, mentoring and capital the explosion of
>>entrepreneurial effort across black America produces little economic
>>output and cannot be sustained or scaled. There must be a national
>>economic competitiveness strategy for black and Hispanic Americans,
>>just as there 
>are economic competitiveness strategies blanketing the nationÒ€?s
>metro regions, albeit none include measurable productivity outcomes for
>communities of color. It is time for an Inclusive Competitiveness
>strategy.
>>Entrepreneurship is the American Dream. It is the primary pathway from
>>poverty to prosperity. In a nation that promotes the myth of
>>meritocracy and upward mobility, entrepreneurship is the real solution 
>>to AmericaÒ€?s current crisis. Entrepreneurship is also the natural
>>outcropping of seeding and cultivating crops of student innovators,
>>like the ones produced by the Hawken Entrepreneurship School. This
>>method of educating students should be mandatory and ingrained in all
>>public schools in underserved communities nationwide. It ought not be
>>reserved solely for the children of middle-class and wealthy parents.
>>FACT CHECK The fastest-growing group of entrepreneurs in America: black
>>women. Overall, women now own 30% of all businesses in the U.S.,
>>accounting for some 9.4 million firms. And African American women
>>control 14% of these companies, or an estimated 1.3 million businesses.
>>These businesses have added an estimated 340,000 jobs to the economy
>>since 2007, while employment at companies owned by men (or with equally
>>shared ownership) has declined.    America must invest in cultivating a
>>new crop of entrepreneurs. The crisis in entrepreneurship across the
>>nation means fewer jobs are being created. Meanwhile, the Kauffman
>>Foundation has long held the point that nearly all net new jobs are the
>>product of fast-growing startups. And the fastest rate of growth in
>>entrepreneurship in America is among black and Hispanic entrepreneurs. 
>>Yet, these innovators remain disconnected from an economic landscape of 
>>resources and 
>investments that was built on a foundation of racism and white
>supremacy. When white Americans consider how future jobs will be
>created, thereÒ€?s no thought to investing in scaling up the
>existing entrepreneurial activity occurring in minority communities.
>>The May 7, 2016 Wall Street Journal blog quoted from an MIT report on
>>the crisis of entrepreneurship in America and then wondered what can be
>>done? Ò€œTo the extent that the current state of American
>>entrepreneurship is facing a crisis, it is not in the rate of creation 
>>of high-growth potential startups or even in the initial funding of
>>those firms, but instead in the potential of those firms to scale in a 
>>meaningful way over time,Ò€ the authors said. Ò€œMuch more
>>worrisome than the rate of creation of high-growth potential firms is
>>the decline in the U.S. ability to accelerate the growth of new
>>businesses conditional on initial qualityÒ€?which has been falling
>>since the late 1990s and only recently, and mildly, begun to recover.
>>Even as the number of new ideas and potential for innovation is
>>increasing, there seems to be a reduction in the ability of startups to
>>scale in a meaningful and systematic way. Whether this 
>is primarily a challenge for capital markets, or reflects systematic
>reductions in various aspects of ecosystem efficiency remains an
>important challenge for both future research and policy
>intervention.Ò€
>>WhatÒ€?s to be done? The policy prescription isnÒ€?t entirely
>>clear. For the innovative, potentially high-growth companies, the
>>authors suggest efforts to help them scale up. But there doesnÒ€?t
>>appear to be a single solution to meet the varying needs of an American
>>entrepreneurial class that ranges from a small mom-and-pop shops to the
>>next would-be Facebook. There is something that can be done. But the
>>solution doesnÒ€?t exist under the antiquated, obsolete exclusionary
>>economic policies and practices of the past. The nation needs to adopt 
>>a new Inclusive Competitiveness strategy that empowers underrepresented 
>>Americans to improve their economic performance and compete in a
>>knowledge-based, tech-driven globally competitive innovation economy.
>>INCLUSIVE AMERICA It is time for a transformation in the upcoming
>>post-Obama era toward building the foundation for a 21st century
>>Inclusive America. To do so, we will have to pierce the bubble of white
>>privilege and permanently leave the past behind. The future of economic
>>inclusion and global competitiveness of America relies on our
>>acceptance of, investment in, and empowerment of all populations in our
>>multicultural, multi-ethnic, multiracial society to reach their maximum
>>potential 
>as American citizens. 
>
>I won't let the "huffington post" dictate how I lived. It's all liberal 
>bullshit.

i'm very sorry that you're so stupid that you actually believe that huffington post is somehow responsible for making racist white people and misogynist males treat you nicer than other people and give you opportunities that they would deny others who don't have a micro-phallus and white skin.

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204510 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Sno

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-14 11:26 -0600
SubjectRe: ? Snowflake ?? Sno
Message-ID<MPG.36059d48d9fe43bf98986f@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#204503
In article <oI6dncHoJtQEcAbGnZ2dnUU7-cXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> >I won't let the "huffington post" dictate how I lived. It's all liberal 
> >bullshit.
> 
> i'm very sorry that you're so stupid that you actually believe that huffington post is somehow responsible for making racist white people and misogynist males treat you nicer than other people and give you opportunities that they would deny others who don't have a micro-phallus and white skin.
> 
> 

I'm sorry you believe that shit, I feel sorry for your kids if you are 
capable of making any.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204543 — Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Sno ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-14 13:03 -0500
SubjectRe: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Sno ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄
Message-ID<0tWdnZvNSIaXZQbGnZ2dnUU7-Q3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#204510
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:26:50 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
<skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<MPG.36059d48d9fe43bf98986f@reader.albasani.net>:
 
>In article <oI6dncHoJtQEcAbGnZ2dnUU7-cXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
>127.0.0.1 says...
>>>I won't let the "huffington post" dictate how I lived. It's all liberal 
>>>bullshit.
>>i'm very sorry that you're so stupid that you actually believe that
>>huffington post is somehow responsible for making racist white people
>>and misogynist males treat you nicer than other people and give you
>>opportunities that they would deny others who don't have a
>>micro-phallus and white skin. 
>
>I'm sorry you believe that shit, I feel sorry for your kids if you are
>capable of making any.

if i had a wife and kids how would i find time to troll your ass on usenet?

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204565 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-14 12:15 -0600
SubjectRe: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla
Message-ID<MPG.3605a8c8f48f9161989877@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#204543
In article <0tWdnZvNSIaXZQbGnZ2dnUU7-Q3NnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> 
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:26:50 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <MPG.36059d48d9fe43bf98986f@reader.albasani.net>:
>  
> >In article <oI6dncHoJtQEcAbGnZ2dnUU7-cXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
> >127.0.0.1 says...
> >>>I won't let the "huffington post" dictate how I lived. It's all liberal 
> >>>bullshit.
> >>i'm very sorry that you're so stupid that you actually believe that
> >>huffington post is somehow responsible for making racist white people
> >>and misogynist males treat you nicer than other people and give you
> >>opportunities that they would deny others who don't have a
> >>micro-phallus and white skin. 
> >
> >I'm sorry you believe that shit, I feel sorry for your kids if you are
> >capable of making any.
> 
> if i had a wife and kids how would i find time to troll your ass on usenet?

Takes about 10 min a day...but your wife would own you...LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204581 — Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πŸΆη¬› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-14 13:24 -0500
SubjectRe: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄
Message-ID<TuednadeYr93YQbGnZ2dnUU7-bfNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#204565
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:15:54 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
<skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<MPG.3605a8c8f48f9161989877@reader.albasani.net>:
 
>In article <0tWdnZvNSIaXZQbGnZ2dnUU7-Q3NnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
>127.0.0.1 says...
>>On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:26:50 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
>>News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
>><skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>><MPG.36059d48d9fe43bf98986f@reader.albasani.net>: 
>>>In article <oI6dncHoJtQEcAbGnZ2dnUU7-cXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
>>>127.0.0.1 says...
>>>>>I won't let the "huffington post" dictate how I lived. It's all liberal 
>>>>>bullshit.
>>>>i'm very sorry that you're so stupid that you actually believe that
>>>>huffington post is somehow responsible for making racist white people
>>>>and misogynist males treat you nicer than other people and give you
>>>>opportunities that they would deny others who don't have a
>>>>micro-phallus and white skin. 
>>>I'm sorry you believe that shit, I feel sorry for your kids if you are
>>>capable of making any.
>>if i had a wife and kids how would i find time to troll your ass on
>>usenet?
>
>Takes about 10 min a day...but your wife would own you...LOL

more deluded fanfic from a run-of-the-mill abusive white male who ignores his dying wife to beat up trannies.

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204656 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-14 17:14 -0600
SubjectRe: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?
Message-ID<MPG.3605eebe712736e798987a@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#204581
In article <TuednadeYr93YQbGnZ2dnUU7-bfNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> 
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:15:54 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <MPG.3605a8c8f48f9161989877@reader.albasani.net>:
>  
> >In article <0tWdnZvNSIaXZQbGnZ2dnUU7-Q3NnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
> >127.0.0.1 says...
> >>On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:26:50 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> >>News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> >><skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> >><MPG.36059d48d9fe43bf98986f@reader.albasani.net>: 
> >>>In article <oI6dncHoJtQEcAbGnZ2dnUU7-cXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
> >>>127.0.0.1 says...
> >>>>>I won't let the "huffington post" dictate how I lived. It's all liberal 
> >>>>>bullshit.
> >>>>i'm very sorry that you're so stupid that you actually believe that
> >>>>huffington post is somehow responsible for making racist white people
> >>>>and misogynist males treat you nicer than other people and give you
> >>>>opportunities that they would deny others who don't have a
> >>>>micro-phallus and white skin. 
> >>>I'm sorry you believe that shit, I feel sorry for your kids if you are
> >>>capable of making any.
> >>if i had a wife and kids how would i find time to troll your ass on
> >>usenet?
> >
> >Takes about 10 min a day...but your wife would own you...LOL
> 
> more deluded fanfic from a run-of-the-mill abusive white male who ignores his dying wife to beat up trannies.


I have tou frothing at the bit now...it is to laugh.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204534 — Re: ? Snowfl

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-09-14 13:43 -0400
SubjectRe: ? Snowfl
Message-ID<pngrvq$jj6$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#204491
On 9/14/2018 1:04 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <6-2dnSyCIP4hTAbGnZ2dnUU7-fXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@ 
> 127.0.0.1 says...
>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:24:25 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter
>> Fake News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter 
>> <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of
>> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with
>> us in <MPG.360572843217c86398984d@reader.albasani.net>:
>>> In article <4ZqdneSSxamhKQfGnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>> root@ 127.0.0.1 says...
>>>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:46:14 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter
>>>> Skeeter Fake News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters
>>>> "Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the
>>>> following was of great importance and subsequently decided to
>>>> freely share it with us in 
>>>> <MPG.3604342fa3600d64989841@reader.albasani.net>:
>>>>> In article <uZumD.43554$8r2.10047@fx34.iad>, silver@slim.er
>>>>> says...
>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>,
>>>>>>> silver@slim.er says...
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> silver@slim.er says...
>>>>>>>>>> I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and
>>>>>>>>>> "misogynist" attacks because they are founded on
>>>>>>>>>> absolutely nothing. I get along with everyone who 
>>>>>>>>>> genuinely wants to get along and it's always been
>>>>>>>>>> that way with me.
>>>>>>>>> Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you
>>>>>>>>> then you automaticly become a racist and sexist and
>>>>>>>>> fascist. Oh and Nazi.
>>>>>>>> I have to admit that just saying something slightly
>>>>>>>> positive about Trump _or_ not disagreeding entirely
>>>>>>>> with everything that comes out of his mouth is enough
>>>>>>>> to be labelled a Nazi around here.
>>>>>>> I didn't even know I was all that until I met
>>>>>>> Kensi/Nads.
>>>>>> I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first
>>>>>> people to suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War -
>>>>>> a Nazi. I think that most people have now dismissed the
>>>>>> whole "you're a racist, you're a fascist, you're a Nazi"
>>>>>> garbage as mental illness by the extreme left. Luckily for
>>>>>> us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with some 
>>>>>> leaning left and others leaning right.
>>>>> As far as I'm concerned when some says I am privileged
>>>>> because I am white? That's a racist statement.
>>>> nobody said it's your fault that you lived your whole life in a
>>>> racist and sexist society that values "whiteness" and
>>>> "maleness" as preferential. only a complete dumbfuck would take
>>>> it personally when someone points out that such attitudes
>>>> obviously benefit all white males and make life that much
>>>> easier for them.
>>> 
>>> What a line of crap. I never got any special treatment because I
>>> am white.
>> 
>> sure you did: by other whites who treat whites better than others.
>> you also got special treatment because you were male.  that you're
>> either too stupid to realize it or too "proud" to admit it changes
>> nothing.
>> 
>> https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/white-privilege-iq-test-5-questions_us_57d90ad6e4b0d93d17700de7
>>
>>
>> QUESTION 1
>> 
>> True or False: The average black family today is much closer in
>> reaching the level of wealth possessed by the average white family
>> than the average black family was in the 1930s.
>> 
>> ANSWER 1
>> 
>> False. ItÒ€?s not even close. The gap has ballooned exponentially
>> from what it was in the 1930s and 40s, when white wealth was three
>> and four times black wealth. Today it is reported to be an
>> incredible multiple of 13 times, according to Inequality.org, based
>> on the latest Pew Research data.
>> 
>> But, it is actually even worse when calculated correctly!
>> 
>> The Pew data includes consumable goods owned by black families,
>> such as vehicles, furniture, televisions and even appliances.
>> NOBODY in America should count their TVs and refrigerators as part
>> of their net worth wealth assets. The Securities and Exchange
>> Commission (SEC), which defines net worth to determine an
>> Ò€œaccredited investor,Ò€ wonÒ€?t even allow the home you live in
>> to count as part of its net worth equation. When durable goods are
>> removed from the net worth
> calculation (which they ought to be according to New York University
> Professor Edward Wolff, one of AmericaÒ€?s foremost economists
> studying wealth inequality), the actual wealth gap is abysmally
> striking.
[...}
> 
> I won't let the "huffington post" dictate how I lived. It's all
> liberal bullshit.

It's like when Trump decides to steal babies.  Nobody should let Trump 
tell them to steal babies and put them in baby jails until they're old 
enough to join the Army and fight for America because that's just commie 
fascist bullshit.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204563 — Re: ? Snowfl

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-14 12:14 -0600
SubjectRe: ? Snowfl
Message-ID<MPG.3605a88b784807bd989876@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#204534
In article <pngrvq$jj6$2@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie 
says...
> 
> On 9/14/2018 1:04 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <6-2dnSyCIP4hTAbGnZ2dnUU7-fXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@ 
> > 127.0.0.1 says...
> >> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:24:25 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter
> >> Fake News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter 
> >> <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of
> >> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with
> >> us in <MPG.360572843217c86398984d@reader.albasani.net>:
> >>> In article <4ZqdneSSxamhKQfGnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> >>> root@ 127.0.0.1 says...
> >>>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:46:14 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter
> >>>> Skeeter Fake News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters
> >>>> "Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the
> >>>> following was of great importance and subsequently decided to
> >>>> freely share it with us in 
> >>>> <MPG.3604342fa3600d64989841@reader.albasani.net>:
> >>>>> In article <uZumD.43554$8r2.10047@fx34.iad>, silver@slim.er
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>,
> >>>>>>> silver@slim.er says...
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>,
> >>>>>>>>> silver@slim.er says...
> >>>>>>>>>> I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and
> >>>>>>>>>> "misogynist" attacks because they are founded on
> >>>>>>>>>> absolutely nothing. I get along with everyone who 
> >>>>>>>>>> genuinely wants to get along and it's always been
> >>>>>>>>>> that way with me.
> >>>>>>>>> Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you
> >>>>>>>>> then you automaticly become a racist and sexist and
> >>>>>>>>> fascist. Oh and Nazi.
> >>>>>>>> I have to admit that just saying something slightly
> >>>>>>>> positive about Trump _or_ not disagreeding entirely
> >>>>>>>> with everything that comes out of his mouth is enough
> >>>>>>>> to be labelled a Nazi around here.
> >>>>>>> I didn't even know I was all that until I met
> >>>>>>> Kensi/Nads.
> >>>>>> I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first
> >>>>>> people to suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War -
> >>>>>> a Nazi. I think that most people have now dismissed the
> >>>>>> whole "you're a racist, you're a fascist, you're a Nazi"
> >>>>>> garbage as mental illness by the extreme left. Luckily for
> >>>>>> us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with some 
> >>>>>> leaning left and others leaning right.
> >>>>> As far as I'm concerned when some says I am privileged
> >>>>> because I am white? That's a racist statement.
> >>>> nobody said it's your fault that you lived your whole life in a
> >>>> racist and sexist society that values "whiteness" and
> >>>> "maleness" as preferential. only a complete dumbfuck would take
> >>>> it personally when someone points out that such attitudes
> >>>> obviously benefit all white males and make life that much
> >>>> easier for them.
> >>> 
> >>> What a line of crap. I never got any special treatment because I
> >>> am white.
> >> 
> >> sure you did: by other whites who treat whites better than others.
> >> you also got special treatment because you were male.  that you're
> >> either too stupid to realize it or too "proud" to admit it changes
> >> nothing.
> >> 
> >> https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/white-privilege-iq-test-5-questions_us_57d90ad6e4b0d93d17700de7
> >>
> >>
> >> QUESTION 1
> >> 
> >> True or False: The average black family today is much closer in
> >> reaching the level of wealth possessed by the average white family
> >> than the average black family was in the 1930s.
> >> 
> >> ANSWER 1
> >> 
> >> False. ItÒ€?s not even close. The gap has ballooned exponentially
> >> from what it was in the 1930s and 40s, when white wealth was three
> >> and four times black wealth. Today it is reported to be an
> >> incredible multiple of 13 times, according to Inequality.org, based
> >> on the latest Pew Research data.
> >> 
> >> But, it is actually even worse when calculated correctly!
> >> 
> >> The Pew data includes consumable goods owned by black families,
> >> such as vehicles, furniture, televisions and even appliances.
> >> NOBODY in America should count their TVs and refrigerators as part
> >> of their net worth wealth assets. The Securities and Exchange
> >> Commission (SEC), which defines net worth to determine an
> >> Ò€œaccredited investor,Ò€ wonÒ€?t even allow the home you live in
> >> to count as part of its net worth equation. When durable goods are
> >> removed from the net worth
> > calculation (which they ought to be according to New York University
> > Professor Edward Wolff, one of AmericaÒ€?s foremost economists
> > studying wealth inequality), the actual wealth gap is abysmally
> > striking.
> [...}
> > 
> > I won't let the "huffington post" dictate how I lived. It's all
> > liberal bullshit.
> 
> It's like when Trump decides to steal babies.  Nobody should let Trump 
> tell them to steal babies and put them in baby jails until they're old 
> enough to join the Army and fight for America because that's just commie 
> fascist bullshit.

I can't believe you're still hanging on to that lie.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204585 — Re: ? Snowfl

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-09-14 14:30 -0400
SubjectRe: ? Snowfl
Message-ID<pnguok$opk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#204563
On 9/14/2018 2:14 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <pngrvq$jj6$2@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie
> says...
>>
>> On 9/14/2018 1:04 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <6-2dnSyCIP4hTAbGnZ2dnUU7-fXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
>>> 127.0.0.1 says...
>>>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:24:25 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter
>>>> Fake News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
>>>> <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of
>>>> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with
>>>> us in <MPG.360572843217c86398984d@reader.albasani.net>:
>>>>> In article <4ZqdneSSxamhKQfGnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>>>> root@ 127.0.0.1 says...
>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:46:14 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter
>>>>>> Skeeter Fake News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters
>>>>>> "Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the
>>>>>> following was of great importance and subsequently decided to
>>>>>> freely share it with us in
>>>>>> <MPG.3604342fa3600d64989841@reader.albasani.net>:
>>>>>>> In article <uZumD.43554$8r2.10047@fx34.iad>, silver@slim.er
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> silver@slim.er says...
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>> silver@slim.er says...
>>>>>>>>>>>> I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and
>>>>>>>>>>>> "misogynist" attacks because they are founded on
>>>>>>>>>>>> absolutely nothing. I get along with everyone who
>>>>>>>>>>>> genuinely wants to get along and it's always been
>>>>>>>>>>>> that way with me.
>>>>>>>>>>> Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you
>>>>>>>>>>> then you automaticly become a racist and sexist and
>>>>>>>>>>> fascist. Oh and Nazi.
>>>>>>>>>> I have to admit that just saying something slightly
>>>>>>>>>> positive about Trump _or_ not disagreeding entirely
>>>>>>>>>> with everything that comes out of his mouth is enough
>>>>>>>>>> to be labelled a Nazi around here.
>>>>>>>>> I didn't even know I was all that until I met
>>>>>>>>> Kensi/Nads.
>>>>>>>> I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first
>>>>>>>> people to suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War -
>>>>>>>> a Nazi. I think that most people have now dismissed the
>>>>>>>> whole "you're a racist, you're a fascist, you're a Nazi"
>>>>>>>> garbage as mental illness by the extreme left. Luckily for
>>>>>>>> us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with some
>>>>>>>> leaning left and others leaning right.
>>>>>>> As far as I'm concerned when some says I am privileged
>>>>>>> because I am white? That's a racist statement.
>>>>>> nobody said it's your fault that you lived your whole life in a
>>>>>> racist and sexist society that values "whiteness" and
>>>>>> "maleness" as preferential. only a complete dumbfuck would take
>>>>>> it personally when someone points out that such attitudes
>>>>>> obviously benefit all white males and make life that much
>>>>>> easier for them.
>>>>>
>>>>> What a line of crap. I never got any special treatment because I
>>>>> am white.
>>>>
>>>> sure you did: by other whites who treat whites better than others.
>>>> you also got special treatment because you were male.  that you're
>>>> either too stupid to realize it or too "proud" to admit it changes
>>>> nothing.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/white-privilege-iq-test-5-questions_us_57d90ad6e4b0d93d17700de7
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> QUESTION 1
>>>>
>>>> True or False: The average black family today is much closer in
>>>> reaching the level of wealth possessed by the average white family
>>>> than the average black family was in the 1930s.
>>>>
>>>> ANSWER 1
>>>>
>>>> False. ItÒ€?s not even close. The gap has ballooned exponentially
>>>> from what it was in the 1930s and 40s, when white wealth was three
>>>> and four times black wealth. Today it is reported to be an
>>>> incredible multiple of 13 times, according to Inequality.org, based
>>>> on the latest Pew Research data.
>>>>
>>>> But, it is actually even worse when calculated correctly!
>>>>
>>>> The Pew data includes consumable goods owned by black families,
>>>> such as vehicles, furniture, televisions and even appliances.
>>>> NOBODY in America should count their TVs and refrigerators as part
>>>> of their net worth wealth assets. The Securities and Exchange
>>>> Commission (SEC), which defines net worth to determine an
>>>> Ò€œaccredited investor,Ò€ wonÒ€?t even allow the home you live in
>>>> to count as part of its net worth equation. When durable goods are
>>>> removed from the net worth
>>> calculation (which they ought to be according to New York University
>>> Professor Edward Wolff, one of AmericaÒ€?s foremost economists
>>> studying wealth inequality), the actual wealth gap is abysmally
>>> striking.
>> [...}
>>>
>>> I won't let the "huffington post" dictate how I lived. It's all
>>> liberal bullshit.
>>
>> It's like when Trump decides to steal babies.  Nobody should let Trump
>> tell them to steal babies and put them in baby jails until they're old
>> enough to join the Army and fight for America because that's just commie
>> fascist bullshit.
> 
> I can't believe you're still hanging on to that lie.

He had to transfer $200 million to the baby stealers because they have 
12,000 babies to take care of and they're running out of places to put 
'em and need money for more places.  That's a lot of babies to feed, 
cloth, shelter and teach soldiering to, but the taxpayer who is too poor 
to get tax writeoffs for new jets is good for it.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204602 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Bollocks

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-14 20:45 +0100
SubjectRe: ? Snowflake ?? Bollocks
Message-ID<1nv4xil.v6i2whlu1aqrN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#204475
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??
<root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:24:25 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <MPG.360572843217c86398984d@reader.albasani.net>:
>  
> >In article <4ZqdneSSxamhKQfGnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
> >127.0.0.1 says...
> >>On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:46:14 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> >>News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> >><skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> >><MPG.3604342fa3600d64989841@reader.albasani.net>: >In article
> >><uZumD.43554$8r2.10047@fx34.iad>, silver@slim.er says... >>On Thu, 13
> >>Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>>In article
> >><AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>, silver@slim.er says... >>>>On Wed, 12
> >>Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>In article
> >><zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>, silver@slim.er says... >>>>>>I simply
> >>reject the "racist," "sexist" and "misogynist" attacks because
> >>>>>>>>they are founded on absolutely nothing. I get along with everyone
> >>who >>>>>>genuinely wants to get along and it's always been that way
> >>with me. >>>>>Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you then
> >>you >>>>>automaticly become a racist and sexist and fascist. Oh and
> >>Nazi. >>>>I have to admit that just saying something slightly positive
> >>about Trump >>>>_or_ not disagreeding entirely with everything that
> >>comes out of his >>>>mouth is enough to be labelled a Nazi around here.
> >>>>>I didn't even know I was all that until I met Kensi/Nads. >>I just
> >>find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first people to >>suffer
> >>Hitler's attacks in the Second World War - a Nazi. I think that >>most
> >>people have now dismissed the whole "you're a racist, you're a
> >>>>fascist, you're a Nazi" garbage as mental illness by the extreme left.
> >>>>Luckily for us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with some
> >>>>leaning left and others leaning right.
> >>>As far as I'm concerned when some says I am privileged because I am
> >>>white? That's a racist statement.
> >>nobody said it's your fault that you lived your whole life in a racist
> >>and sexist society that values "whiteness" and "maleness" as
> >>preferential. only a complete dumbfuck would take it personally when
> >>someone points out that such attitudes obviously benefit all white
> >>males and make life that much easier for them.
> >
> >What a line of crap. I never got any special treatment because I am
> >white.
> 
> sure you did: by other whites who treat whites better than others.  
> you also [...]

TL;DR

-- 
^Ï^     My pet rock Gordon just yawned.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204222

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-13 12:02 -0400
Message-ID<pne1lv$1s5b$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#204204
On 9/13/2018 11:01 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:13:33 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
>> In article <AftmD.43086$OM2.13816@fx37.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:07:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <zMcmD.67923$3L2.31722@fx44.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>>>>> I simply reject the "racist," "sexist" and "misogynist" attacks
>>>>> because they are founded on absolutely nothing. I get along with
>>>>> everyone who genuinely wants to get along and it's always been that
>>>>> way with me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Like I said, if the Kensi/Nads doesn't agree with you then you
>>>> automaticly become a racist and sexist and fascist.
>>>>
>>>> Oh and Nazi.
>>>
>>> I have to admit that just saying something slightly positive about
>>> Trump _or_ not disagreeding entirely with everything that comes out of
>>> his mouth is enough to be labelled a Nazi around here.
>>
>> I didn't even know I was all that until I met Kensi/Nads.
> 
> I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first people to
> suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War - a Nazi.
> 
> I think that most people have now dismissed the whole "you're a racist,
> you're a fascist, you're a Nazi" garbage as mental illness by the extreme
> left. Luckily for us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with
> some leaning left and others leaning right.
> 
This is natural because these are science and IT groups. In science (and 
in IT) one simply cannot get by with bullshit because reality smacks you 
down. This is why lefties always flunk out of science. They ace every 
humanities course without cracking a book, (Which drives geeks crazy) 
but when they try the same approach with science classes they fall right 
on their faces. In science all statements are tested against reality 
which leaves bullshit in the dust. Yet there are still many lefties who 
are confident in their ability to bullshit their way, passing themselves 
off as knowledgeable in science. Those with real science knowledge spot 
the bullshit right away.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#204228

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-13 17:47 +0100
Message-ID<1nv2ty0.1l3ohte4cppq6N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#204222
benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

> >> I didn't even know I was all that until I met Kensi/Nads.
> >> 
> > 
> > I just find it funny for someone to call a Pole - the first people to
> > suffer Hitler's attacks in the Second World War - a Nazi.
> > 
> > I think that most people have now dismissed the whole "you're a racist,
> > you're a fascist, you're a Nazi" garbage as mental illness by the extreme
> > left. Luckily for us, the people in this newsgroup are most centre with
> > some leaning left and others leaning right.
> > 
>
> This is natural because these are science and IT groups. In science (and
> in IT) one simply cannot get by with bullshit because reality smacks you
> down. This is why lefties always flunk out of science. They ace every
> humanities course without cracking a book, (Which drives geeks crazy)
> but when they try the same approach with science classes they fall right
> on their faces. In science all statements are tested against reality 
> which leaves bullshit in the dust. Yet there are still many lefties who
> are confident in their ability to bullshit their way, passing themselves
> off as knowledgeable in science. Those with real science knowledge spot
> the bullshit right away.
>

That accurately describes the Pembroke Poseur, apart from 
the humanities courses part, of course.  Paul wouldn't 
recognise humanity if it bit him on the backside.  Being 
an Asperger's syndrome suffererer he simply can't relate; 
he's too far along the autism spectrum to understand real 
people.  He's quite bright, just orthogonal to Real Life. 

-- 
^Ï^     My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 22 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 20 21 [22] 23 24 … 26  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate


csiph-web