Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #208020

"God" has punished Nadegda for this.

From Jeff-Relf.Me @.
Message-ID <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.25--2.47am.Seattle.2018> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <17idnVRM5OvnnjTGnZ2dnUU7-QnNnZ2d@giganews.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.24--9.01am.Seattle.2018> <pobgde$mhp$32@dont-email.me> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.24--3.17pm.Seattle.2018> <poc3r5$mhp$38@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.checkmate
Subject "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Organization usenet-news.net
Date 2018-09-25 02:47 -0700

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
> > 
> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%), etc.;
> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't mind,
> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
> 
> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny 
> and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.

"God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.

> > I think the government should give junkies free heroin,
> > so they don't have to steal $3,000/month from little people, like me.
> > The city won't put them in jail, as that costs $100,000/year.
> 
> Seriously? Tax-subsidized drug dealing?

Yes, get rid of the black market.
Legalize drugs and prostitution.

> How about free methadone instead?

There's nothing special about methadone, it's just another lethal opioid.
The fact that it's already being done, as I suggested, 
doesn't mean that I was wrong.

> > Public housing doesn't work because, they can't follow the rules.
> > It's harm reduction, the LessBad option.
> 
> ???

Some options are less crappy than others.
As it stands now, the government is putting the burden on little people,
like me ( see the $3,000/month figure above ).

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
  Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:25 -0600
  Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:30 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 20:44 -0500
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:45 -0700
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:26 -0400
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:42 -0500
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:30 -0400
            Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:01 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:34 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:38 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:30 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:13 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 11:19 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 17:12 +0100
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:40 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 18:51 +0100
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:20 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 22:58 +0100
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:43 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:48 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:07 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:49 -0500
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:19 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 13:28 -0500
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:30 -0600
                Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:42 -0500
                Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:18 -0600
                Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 18:53 +0000
                Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:04 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:50 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:34 -0500
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:44 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:17 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:32 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:36 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:15 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 11:25 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 18:56 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 15:04 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 21:57 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:34 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:06 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
                Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:40 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:53 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:15 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:50 -0600
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
                I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:57 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snow ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 09:57 -0500
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snow ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:04 -0600
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:23 +0100
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:34 -0600
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:03 -0600
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:31 -0600
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:05 -0600
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 13:18 -0600
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 19:43 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:54 -0600
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
                Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:53 -0600
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:56 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:57 -0600
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:58 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 11:30 -0600
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 14:00 -0400
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-29 20:12 +0100
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
                Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
                "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:16 -0600
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
                If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
                Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:32 -0600
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
                Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
                Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
                Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
                Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
                I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
                If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
                Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
                Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
                Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
                Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
                Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
                Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
                Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
                The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
                Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
                Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
                Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
                I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
                Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:42 -0600
                Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
                Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
                Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
                Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:28 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:02 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:30 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
                Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
                The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
                Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
                Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
                Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:33 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 10:22 -0500
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 11:21 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snow ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 13:23 -0500
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0600
                Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 14:00 -0400
                Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:07 -0400
                Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
                Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:32 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:24 -0600
                Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
                Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
                Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
                Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
                Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
                Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
                Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:21 -0600
                Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
                Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
                Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
                Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
                Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:36 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
                Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
                Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:35 -0600
                If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
                If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:23 -0600
                Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
                Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:35 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 11:17 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:17 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Scatboi g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-10-01 12:38 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-10-01 13:11 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:17 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:33 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:49 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400

(Thread has 1006 articles, showing 500 — browse group in flat view)

csiph-web