Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.building.construction > #6250
| Subject | Re: Letters to the Editor: Converting office buildings into apartments isn't as easy as you might think |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-30 23:53 +0200 |
| References | <3970433a0fc50e09160819b9e4d6b208@dizum.com> <sspvp2$ltma$57@news.freedyn.de> |
| Newsgroups | alt.building.construction, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.home.repair, sac.politics, talk.politics.guns |
| From | You get what you vote for <karen.bass.unqualified.black.cunt@splcenter.org> |
| Message-ID | <182c645d7f2a759efb1abc8677b9300a@dizum.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 25 Jan 2022, Biden sucks <jthomq@gmail.com> posted some
news:sspvp2$ltma$57@news.freedyn.de:
> Democrats say just hang some plywood and throw paint on it. Fuck the
> regulations we passed.
To the editor: While I think converting underused or vacant office
buildings into housing is a pretty good idea, I think most proponents are
clueless about how much it costs to do this. ("Turning office buildings
into apartments is how California eases the housing crisis," editorial,
June 25)
I worked in an office that had a floor space of about 10,000 square feet.
There were a set of bathrooms on either end. Each cube had one 15-amp
electrical outlet, maybe two.
All that plumbing and electrical work to make the space suitable for
housing has to be run. Then there's the loading considerations of building
soundproof walls, adding water heaters and more.
It's not exactly a slam-dunk solution to the housing problem. Residential
conversion just can't be done in a lot of office buildings.
Gregg Ferry, Carlsbad
..
To the editor: Conversion of vacant and underutilized commercial
properties to create affordable housing is a great idea. As you note, such
projects can revitalize neighborhoods, reduce environmental impacts and
preserve local architecture and character.
That’s why such conversions have long been favored by community activists
who are routinely dismissed as "NIMBYs," for "not in my backyard."
Recent and pending legislation that facilitates conversion and adaptive
reuse deserves support, provided the housing is actually affordable. May I
modestly suggest that exemption waivers and incentives for affordable
housing projects be contingent on thorough, rigorous monitoring and
enforcement backed up by stiff penalties for violators?
Or is all that stuff just too NIMBY to consider?
Shelley Wagers, Los Angeles
..
To the editor: Recycling anything is a good idea. And that includes
buildings. Yet the editor could have selected a better example than the
Crosby in Los Angeles' Koreatown neighborhood for the picture that ran
with this editorial.
When I checked the building's website, the Crosby had 21 units available
throughout the 12 floors of the two buildings. A 715-square-foot studio
with one bathroom rents for $2,370. That’s hardly affordable.
Mark Stephen Mrotek, Carson
Walter
8 hours ago
Exactly. An office building's closest correlation to housing is a
military barracks. Communal bathroom and shower, no individual cooking,
privacy limited to what cube partitions provide. It takes major interior
rework, in some cases simply impossible, to turn office space into
anything resembling apartments.
https://news.yahoo.com/letters-editor-converting-office-buildings-
100033358.html
Back to alt.building.construction | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Letters to the Editor: Converting office buildings into apartments isn't as easy as you might think You get what you vote for <karen.bass.unqualified.black.cunt@splcenter.org> - 2023-06-30 23:53 +0200
csiph-web