Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.binaries.3d.daz-studio > #728 > unrolled thread

Re: This may have been more complicated than needed

Started by"Stephen" <sbriggs99@gmail.com>
First post2020-06-10 20:07 -0400
Last post2020-06-11 20:34 -0500
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.binaries.3d.daz-studio

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: This may have been more complicated than needed "Stephen" <sbriggs99@gmail.com> - 2020-06-10 20:07 -0400
    Re: This may have been more complicated than needed Dana Haywood <no.way@jos> - 2020-06-10 18:31 -0700
      Re: This may have been more complicated than needed McGrandpa <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com> - 2020-06-11 20:34 -0500

#728 — Re: This may have been more complicated than needed

From"Stephen" <sbriggs99@gmail.com>
Date2020-06-10 20:07 -0400
SubjectRe: This may have been more complicated than needed
Message-ID<5ee175dc@LostBBS>
Cool animation Dana!  I wish it was longer.

"Dana Haywood" <no.way@jos> wrote in message 
news:CrednUq0q_ts8nzDnZ2dnUU7-KvNnZ2d@giganews.com...
> The rendering of the outside, car, and the guy was taking too long per
> frame..which is a problem since only two things are really moving. So I
> render the outside for about 40 frames, and all of the man turning his
> head. I render the car as a static, and made some masks so I could make
> it look like I rendered it all as a single clip.
>
> For a bonus, I put a cigarette smoke in, and used Motion Tracking to
> have it follow the cigarette.
> 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#729

FromDana Haywood <no.way@jos>
Date2020-06-10 18:31 -0700
Message-ID<aumdnUF5pMbEFHzDnZ2dnUU7-YOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#728
On 6/10/2020 05:07 PM, Stephen wrote:
> Cool animation Dana!  I wish it was longer.
> 
> "Dana Haywood" <no.way@jos> wrote in message 
> news:CrednUq0q_ts8nzDnZ2dnUU7-KvNnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> The rendering of the outside, car, and the guy was taking too long per
>> frame..which is a problem since only two things are really moving. So I
>> render the outside for about 40 frames, and all of the man turning his
>> head. I render the car as a static, and made some masks so I could make
>> it look like I rendered it all as a single clip.
>>
>> For a bonus, I put a cigarette smoke in, and used Motion Tracking to
>> have it follow the cigarette.
>>

three seconds isn't long enough? At 30 fps, that is 120 frames.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#735

FromMcGrandpa <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com>
Date2020-06-11 20:34 -0500
Message-ID<5ee2dbbb@LostBBS>
In reply to#729

On 6/10/2020 8:31 PM, Dana Haywood wrote:
> On 6/10/2020 05:07 PM, Stephen wrote:
>> Cool animation Dana!  I wish it was longer.
>>
>> "Dana Haywood" <no.way@jos> wrote in message
>> news:CrednUq0q_ts8nzDnZ2dnUU7-KvNnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>> The rendering of the outside, car, and the guy was taking too long per
>>> frame..which is a problem since only two things are really moving. So I
>>> render the outside for about 40 frames, and all of the man turning his
>>> head. I render the car as a static, and made some masks so I could make
>>> it look like I rendered it all as a single clip.
>>>
>>> For a bonus, I put a cigarette smoke in, and used Motion Tracking to
>>> have it follow the cigarette.
>>>
>
> three seconds isn't long enough? At 30 fps, that is 120 frames.

no of course it isn't long enough, we want a whole MOVIE man, the MOVIE! 
  ;o)   And it does look like its rendered in one clip.  Good job!
McG.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | alt.binaries.3d.daz-studio


csiph-web