Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2152148 > unrolled thread

The Mind of Satan

Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism

Contents

  The Mind of Satan The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-07 12:11 -0700
    Re: The Mind of Satan Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 21:40 +0200
      Re: The Mind of Satan Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 21:54 +0200
        Re: The Mind of Satan Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-08-07 13:03 -0700
        Re: The Mind of Satan The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-07 13:54 -0700
        Re: The Mind of Satan The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-07 17:57 -0700
        Re: The Mind of Satan The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-09 12:53 -0700
          Re: The Mind of Satan The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-09 13:03 -0700
      Re: The Mind of Satan Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-08-08 08:55 +0800
        Re: The Mind of Satan Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 06:46 +0200
    Re: The Mind of Satan Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-07 15:18 -0500
      Re: The Mind of Satan Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-08-08 08:57 +0800
        Re: The Mind of Satan Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-08-10 13:15 +0000
    Re: The Mind of Satan Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 18:30 -0700
      Re: The Mind of Satan Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-08-07 20:47 -0500
        Re: The Mind of Satan MarkA <someone@somewhere.invalid> - 2016-08-08 15:10 +0000
          Re: The Mind of Satan Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-08-10 13:20 +0000
      Re: The Mind of Satan John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-08-08 08:37 -0700
        Re: The Mind of Satan AfricaHasNoMasers <africahasnomasters@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 11:47 -0700
    Re: The Mind of Satan Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 17:52 -0700

#2152148 — The Mind of Satan

Albert Einstein is quoted as saying..

"I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details." 


he also is quoted as saying:

"I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice." 

also..

"God is subtle but he is not malicious." 



but then, Albert Einstein sent a letter to Roosevelt
http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first

and it launched the atomic bombs!


That is when Albert Einstein entered The Mind of Satan.


Now, if you believe there is no God, you're probably in The Mind of Satan, don't you agree?


You certaintly don't want to know God's thoughts, ...


God is not malicious, Satan is.


God is all Good, Satan is all bad...


God is all positive, Satan is all negative.


So, what's it going to be, Heaven or Hell? 


You wanna be a zero all your life, or do you want to be Number 1?


Those of yous who want to be a zero, step to the left...

Those of yous who want to be number one, step to your right.


Do you want to live in the dark side of the moon...or do you want to live on the bright side of the moon?


Just in case you're wondering...Satan lives on the dark side of the moon.


Now, if you're an Atheist..you're probably in The Mind of Satan. I got good news for you...


God is not to far away...just a few inches...move over to the right.


Now, you're number 1.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152156

Dne 07/08/2016 v 21:11 The Starmaker napsal(a):
> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying..
> 
> "I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details." 
> 
> 
> he also is quoted as saying:
> 
> "I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice." 
> 
> also..
> 
> "God is subtle but he is not malicious." 

> 
> but then, Albert Einstein sent a letter to Roosevelt
> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first
> 
> and it launched the atomic bombs!
> 

His reasoning is well known,
and must be evaluated in historical context.

The Uranium 235 fission was discovered by German physicists in 1938.

Germans had available the rich uranium deposites
in the Czech mines of Jachymov. ( BTW the same Jachymov
where the origin of the word dollar came from )

USA having A bombs and Germany not having it
was considered less evil then the opposite.

Who are you to judge a person
choosing the evil, that seemed lesser at that time ?

-- 
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152164

Dne 07/08/2016 v 21:40 Poutnik napsal(a):

>>
> 
> His reasoning is well known,
> and must be evaluated in historical context.
> 

P.S.>
Einstein speeded up the development just by few years,
by political rather then scientific means.

The bomb would be developed anyway by whatever party.

If had not deployed on Japanese cities, who knows
what alternative history we would have passed.
Perhaps we would afraid nukes less than we do now.

I like the Gandalf's quote in this context:
"Even the very wise cannot see all ends."

-- 
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152169

On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 3:54:53 PM UTC-4, Poutnik wrote:
> Dne 07/08/2016 v 21:40 Poutnik napsal(a):
> 
> >>
> > 
> > His reasoning is well known,
> > and must be evaluated in historical context.
> > 
> 
> P.S.>
> Einstein speeded up the development just by few years,
> by political rather then scientific means.
> 
> The bomb would be developed anyway by whatever party.
> 
> If had not deployed on Japanese cities, who knows
> what alternative history we would have passed.
> Perhaps we would afraid nukes less than we do now.
> 
> I like the Gandalf's quote in this context:
> "Even the very wise cannot see all ends."
>

Please trim groups replying to this troll.

Better yet, don't reply at all.

*mucker posts, reposts, and re-posts his anti-Einstein crankiness
interminably.  He is immune yo argument and never actually engages
with anyone who replies.  Pure troll.

Kevin R 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152199

Poutnik wrote:
> 
> Dne 07/08/2016 v 21:40 Poutnik napsal(a):
> 
> >>
> >
> > His reasoning is well known,
> > and must be evaluated in historical context.
> >
> 
> P.S.>
> Einstein speeded up the development just by few years,
> by political rather then scientific means.

hogwash. 

What do you think this old guy is showing this kid how to do?
http://www.atomicheritage.org/sites/default/files/einstein-oppenheimer.jpg






> 
> The bomb would be developed anyway by whatever party.

You certaintly don't have an understanding of 'ideas' and how they come about.


That's like saying the paper clip would have been invented anyway by someone else.


The truth is, it was Albert Einstein who developed the atomic bomb...not Thomas Edison.


First you have to have around ten years experience in a patent office to understand how to build things...
then you have to have an idea like e=mc2.

Then you take the knowledge of both and you build an atomic bomb.


http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html









The kid is saying to the old guy..."HOW DO YOU BUILD THIS FUCKIN THING????"
http://www.atomicheritage.org/sites/default/files/einstein-oppenheimer.jpg














> 
> If had not deployed on Japanese cities, who knows
> what alternative history we would have passed.
> Perhaps we would afraid nukes less than we do now.

I cannot argue with "who knows".


> 
> I like the Gandalf's quote in this context:
> "Even the very wise cannot see all ends."

> 
> --
> Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )


Oh yeah, I'm the type of guy that likes to roam around
I'm never in one place, I roam from town to town


Yeah, 'cause I'm der wanderer
Yeah, der wanderer
I roam around, around, around, around, around, around

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152310

TB wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 12:54:53 PM UTC-7, Poutnik wrote:
> > Dne 07/08/2016 v 21:40 Poutnik napsal(a):
> >
> > >>
> > >
> > > His reasoning is well known,
> > > and must be evaluated in historical context.
> > >
> >
> > P.S.>
> > Einstein speeded up the development just by few years,
> > by political rather then scientific means.
> >
> > The bomb would be developed anyway by whatever party.
> 
> Such as the USSR?


No, not *anyway*....It was Albert Einstein who developed the atomic bomb in Russia..along with his friends at the Manhattan Project.

(Just in case the United States decided to change it's mind, Albert Einstein had to make sure it got built.)


If you read your science fiction, Contact by Carl Sagan, they built two machines...just in case.




> >
> > If had not deployed on Japanese cities, who knows
> > what alternative history we would have passed.
> > Perhaps we would afraid nukes less than we do now.
> 
> We might have Russia ruling at least half of Japan!  (Our A-Bombs forced Japan to surrender before Russia could take more than a few Japanese islands).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2153284

Peter Trei wrote:
> 
> On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 11:14:38 PM UTC-4, J. Clarke wrote:
> > In article <d419c451-9085-403e-9270-a4834762df5f@googlegroups.com>,
> > tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us says...
> > >
> > > On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 5:41:48 PM UTC-7, J. Clarke wrote:
> > > > In article <958dc36e-14fb-460e-946c-55d639d9c945@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us says...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 12:54:53 PM UTC-7, Poutnik wrote:
> > > > > > Dne 07/08/2016 v 21:40 Poutnik napsal(a):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > His reasoning is well known,
> > > > > > > and must be evaluated in historical context.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > P.S.>
> > > > > > Einstein speeded up the development just by few years,
> > > > > > by political rather then scientific means.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The bomb would be developed anyway by whatever party.
> > > > >
> > > > > Such as the USSR?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If had not deployed on Japanese cities, who knows
> > > > > > what alternative history we would have passed.
> > > > > > Perhaps we would afraid nukes less than we do now.
> > > > >
> > > > > We might have Russia ruling at least half of Japan!  (Our A-Bombs forced Japan to surrender before Russia could take more than a few Japanese islands).
> > > >
> > > > Or alternatively the Russians taking a few islands led to the Japanese
> > > > surrendering regardless of nuclear weapons.,
> > >
> > > The Japanese had fought like demons against the Allied forces heretofore.  I see no reason for them to surrender over a few islands!
> >
> > The Japanese are many things, but fools is not one of them.  Given the
> > choice between Soviet occupation and US occupation, which would _you_
> > take?
> 
> I once read an account by one of the Japanese senior command of the top brass'
> reaction. He was on the 'surrender faction', and said that the thing which
> really affected peoples attitudes was that the US had destroyed the city with
> *one* *single* *device*, and they had no idea how many more would be coming.
> 
> pt

That Japaneese senior command of the top brass was refering to Albert Einstein device:

"...that extremely powerful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this

type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy

the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory." -Albert Einstein


http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first


All the japaneese people know there is only one man to blame for that...
http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html


The Starmaker


but then...Albert Einstein try to appologize to the Japaneese people...he said:


"Hey Man, they were fucking trying to kill me!!!!"


""...Such a case would be when I face an opponent whose unconditional aim is to destroy me..." --Albert Einstein


http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2005/07/05/2003262351



Albert Einstein was saying.."I didn't want them to kill the fuckin chinks, I wanted them to kill the fuckin KRAUTS!!!!"



"...That means there are circumstances in which in my opinion it is necessary to use force," --Albert Einsetin



and by "force' he means...THE FUCKIN ATOMIC BOMB!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2153293

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Peter Trei wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 11:14:38 PM UTC-4, J. Clarke wrote:
> > > In article <d419c451-9085-403e-9270-a4834762df5f@googlegroups.com>,
> > > tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us says...
> > > >
> > > > On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 5:41:48 PM UTC-7, J. Clarke wrote:
> > > > > In article <958dc36e-14fb-460e-946c-55d639d9c945@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us says...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 12:54:53 PM UTC-7, Poutnik wrote:
> > > > > > > Dne 07/08/2016 v 21:40 Poutnik napsal(a):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > His reasoning is well known,
> > > > > > > > and must be evaluated in historical context.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > P.S.>
> > > > > > > Einstein speeded up the development just by few years,
> > > > > > > by political rather then scientific means.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The bomb would be developed anyway by whatever party.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Such as the USSR?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If had not deployed on Japanese cities, who knows
> > > > > > > what alternative history we would have passed.
> > > > > > > Perhaps we would afraid nukes less than we do now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We might have Russia ruling at least half of Japan!  (Our A-Bombs forced Japan to surrender before Russia could take more than a few Japanese islands).
> > > > >
> > > > > Or alternatively the Russians taking a few islands led to the Japanese
> > > > > surrendering regardless of nuclear weapons.,
> > > >
> > > > The Japanese had fought like demons against the Allied forces heretofore.  I see no reason for them to surrender over a few islands!
> > >
> > > The Japanese are many things, but fools is not one of them.  Given the
> > > choice between Soviet occupation and US occupation, which would _you_
> > > take?
> >
> > I once read an account by one of the Japanese senior command of the top brass'
> > reaction. He was on the 'surrender faction', and said that the thing which
> > really affected peoples attitudes was that the US had destroyed the city with
> > *one* *single* *device*, and they had no idea how many more would be coming.
> >
> > pt
> 
> That Japaneese senior command of the top brass was refering to Albert Einstein device:
> 
> "...that extremely powerful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
> 
> type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
> 
> the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory." -Albert Einstein
> 
> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first
> 
> All the japaneese people know there is only one man to blame for that...
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> but then...Albert Einstein try to appologize to the Japaneese people...he said:
> 
> "Hey Man, they were fucking trying to kill me!!!!"
> 
> ""...Such a case would be when I face an opponent whose unconditional aim is to destroy me..." --Albert Einstein
> 
> http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2005/07/05/2003262351
> 
> Albert Einstein was saying.."I didn't want them to kill the fuckin chinks, I wanted them to kill the fuckin KRAUTS!!!!"
> 
> "...That means there are circumstances in which in my opinion it is necessary to use force," --Albert Einsetin
> 
> and by "force' he means...THE FUCKIN ATOMIC BOMB!!!!


copy of the letter einstein sent? (it's in Jermen) (anybody speak kraut?) actung, actung..mach schnell..

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/the-picture-shows-a-copy-of-one-of-letters-which-japanese-news-photo/103251407#the-picture-shows-a-copy-of-one-of-letters-which-japanese-philosopher-picture-id103251407

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152309

On 8/08/2016 3:40 AM, Poutnik wrote:
> Dne 07/08/2016 v 21:11 The Starmaker napsal(a):
>> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying..
>>
>> "I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details."
>>
>>
>> he also is quoted as saying:
>>
>> "I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice."
>>
>> also..
>>
>> "God is subtle but he is not malicious."
>
>>
>> but then, Albert Einstein sent a letter to Roosevelt
>> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first
>>
>> and it launched the atomic bombs!
>>
>
> His reasoning is well known,
> and must be evaluated in historical context.
>
> The Uranium 235 fission was discovered by German physicists in 1938.
>
> Germans had available the rich uranium deposites
> in the Czech mines of Jachymov. ( BTW the same Jachymov
> where the origin of the word dollar came from )

The Joachimsthal, where the word "dollar" comes from, is in Brandenburg, 
Germany. I admit I thought the dollar came from Marienthal, so I would 
have been wrong too. However, I see that Jáchymov is also know as Sankt 
Joachimsthal, but it's not the right valley.

-- 
Robert B. born England a long time ago;
Western Australia since 1972

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152383

Dne 08/08/2016 v 02:55 Robert Bannister napsal(a):
> On 8/08/2016 3:40 AM, Poutnik wrote:
>> Dne 07/08/2016 v 21:11 The Starmaker napsal(a):
>>> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying..
>>>
>>> "I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details."
>>>
>>>
>>> he also is quoted as saying:
>>>
>>> "I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice."
>>>
>>> also..
>>>
>>> "God is subtle but he is not malicious."
>>
>>>
>>> but then, Albert Einstein sent a letter to Roosevelt
>>> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first
>>>
>>> and it launched the atomic bombs!
>>>
>>
>> His reasoning is well known,
>> and must be evaluated in historical context.
>>
>> The Uranium 235 fission was discovered by German physicists in 1938.
>>
>> Germans had available the rich uranium deposites
>> in the Czech mines of Jachymov. ( BTW the same Jachymov
>> where the origin of the word dollar came from )
> 
> The Joachimsthal, where the word "dollar" comes from, is in Brandenburg, 
> Germany. I admit I thought the dollar came from Marienthal, so I would 
> have been wrong too. However, I see that Jáchymov is also know as Sankt 
> Joachimsthal, but it's not the right valley.
> 
But is was Joachimtal in Czech lands,
where the tolars were coined.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollar

On 15 January 1520, the Czech Kingdom of Bohemia began minting coins
from silver mined locally in Joachimsthal (Czech Jáchymov) and marked on
reverse with the Czech lion. The coins were called "''Joachimsthaler'',"
which became shortened in common usage to thaler or taler. The German
name "Joachimsthal" literally means "Joachim's valley" or "Joachim's dale".

This name found its way into other languages: Czech tolar, Hungarian
tallér, Danish and Norwegian (rigs) daler, Swedish (riks) daler,
Icelandic dalur, Dutch (rijks)daalder or daler, Ethiopian ታላሪ
("talari"), Italian tallero, Polish talar, Persian dare, as well as -
via Dutch - into English as dollar.[1]

A later Dutch coin depicting also a lion was called the leeuwendaler or
leeuwendaalder, literally 'lion daler'. The Dutch Republic produced
these coins to accommodate its booming international trade. The
leeuwendaler circulated throughout the Middle East and was imitated in
several German and Italian cities. This coin was also popular in the
Dutch East Indies and in the Dutch New Netherland Colony (New York). It
was in circulation throughout the Thirteen Colonies during the 17th and
early 18th centuries and was popularly known as "lion (or lyon)
dollar".[2][3] The currencies of Romania and Bulgaria are, to this day,
'lion' (leu/leva). The modern American-English pronunciation of dollar
is still remarkably close to the 17th century Dutch pronunciation of
daler.[4] Some well-worn examples circulating in the Colonies were known
as "dog dollars".[5]

-- 
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152181

On 8/7/2016 2:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying..

>
> That is when Albert Einstein entered The Mind of Satan.

na,  Einsteins son was skicofreenic and killed his first wife.


> Now, if you believe there is no God, you're probably in The Mind of Satan, don't you agree?

they get auto-joined if the deny God, to Satin's Agnosticses




>
> God is all positive, Satan is all negative.

Obama tries to  be positeve, but he is Satin. So is Hillary, evil.
Trump like to blow his own trump-et.


>
> You wanna be a zero all your life, or do you want to be Number 1?

  Why be whole ?   I would rather be rational.


> Do you want to live in the dark side of the moon...or do you want to live on the bright side of the moon?
>
>
> Just in case you're wondering...Satan lives on the dark side of the moon.

          and he is still using evil Edison tunston wire light bulbs there.


>
>
> Now, if you're an Atheist..you're probably in The Mind of Satan. I got good news for you...
> God is not to far away...just a few inches...move over to the right.
> Now, you're number 1.

good advise, Athiest deny God, because they believe they *are* God.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152311

On 8/08/2016 4:18 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 8/7/2016 2:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying..
>
>>
>> That is when Albert Einstein entered The Mind of Satan.
>
> na,  Einsteins son was skicofreenic and killed his first wife.
>
>
>> Now, if you believe there is no God, you're probably in The Mind of
>> Satan, don't you agree?
>
> they get auto-joined if the deny God, to Satin's Agnosticses
>
>
>
>
>>
>> God is all positive, Satan is all negative.
>
> Obama tries to  be positeve, but he is Satin. So is Hillary, evil.
> Trump like to blow his own trump-et.
>
>
>>
>> You wanna be a zero all your life, or do you want to be Number 1?
>
>  Why be whole ?   I would rather be rational.
>
>
>> Do you want to live in the dark side of the moon...or do you want to
>> live on the bright side of the moon?
>>
>>
>> Just in case you're wondering...Satan lives on the dark side of the moon.
>
>          and he is still using evil Edison tunston wire light bulbs there.
>
>
>>
>>
>> Now, if you're an Atheist..you're probably in The Mind of Satan. I got
>> good news for you...
>> God is not to far away...just a few inches...move over to the right.
>> Now, you're number 1.
>
> good advise, Athiest deny God, because they believe they *are* God.
>

Whatever drugs you are on, I suggest you ease up a bit before you lose 
your mind completely.

-- 
Robert B. born England a long time ago;
Western Australia since 1972

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2153710

On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 08:57:09 +0800, Robert Bannister wrote:

> On 8/08/2016 4:18 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 8/7/2016 2:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying..
>>
>>> That is when Albert Einstein entered The Mind of Satan.
>>
>> na,  Einsteins son was skicofreenic and killed his first wife.
>>
>>> Now, if you believe there is no God, you're probably in The Mind of
>>> Satan, don't you agree?
>>
>> they get auto-joined if the deny God, to Satin's Agnosticses
>>
>>> God is all positive, Satan is all negative.
>>
>> Obama tries to  be positeve, but he is Satin. So is Hillary, evil.
>> Trump like to blow his own trump-et.
>>
>>> You wanna be a zero all your life, or do you want to be Number 1?
>>
>>  Why be whole ?   I would rather be rational.
>>
>>> Do you want to live in the dark side of the moon...or do you want to
>>> live on the bright side of the moon?
>>>
>>> Just in case you're wondering...Satan lives on the dark side of the
>>> moon.
>>
>>          and he is still using evil Edison tunston wire light bulbs
>>          there.
>>
>>> Now, if you're an Atheist..you're probably in The Mind of Satan. I got
>>> good news for you...
>>> God is not to far away...just a few inches...move over to the right.
>>> Now, you're number 1.
>>
>> good advise, Athiest deny God, because they believe they *are* God.
>>
> Whatever drugs you are on, I suggest you ease up a bit before you lose
> your mind completely.

I suspect that your advice comes too late.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152322

On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 12:11:34 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying..
> 
> "I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details." 
> 
> 
> he also is quoted as saying:
> 
> "I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice." 
> 
> also..
> 
> "God is subtle but he is not malicious." 
> 
> 
> 
> but then, Albert Einstein sent a letter to Roosevelt
> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first
> 
> and it launched the atomic bombs!
> 
> 
> That is when Albert Einstein entered The Mind of Satan.
> 
> 
> Now, if you believe there is no God, you're probably in The Mind of Satan, don't you agree?
> 
> 
> You certaintly don't want to know God's thoughts, ...
> 
> 
> God is not malicious, Satan is.
> 
> 
> God is all Good, Satan is all bad...
> 
> 
> God is all positive, Satan is all negative.
> 
> 
> So, what's it going to be, Heaven or Hell? 
> 
> 
> You wanna be a zero all your life, or do you want to be Number 1?
> 
> 
> Those of yous who want to be a zero, step to the left...
> 
> Those of yous who want to be number one, step to your right.
> 
> 
> Do you want to live in the dark side of the moon...or do you want to live on the bright side of the moon?
> 
> 
> Just in case you're wondering...Satan lives on the dark side of the moon.
> 
> 
> Now, if you're an Atheist..you're probably in The Mind of Satan. I got good news for you...
> 
> 
> God is not to far away...just a few inches...move over to the right.
> 
> 
> Now, you're number 1.

The one thing I know is that God is not.

Just like Satan is not.

They don't exist.

Prove otherwise.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152325

On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 18:30:04 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
<youngblood2949@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 12:11:34 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying..
>> 
>> "I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details." 

He was speaking metaphorically. 

For him, the word "God" meant the underlying laws of physics by which
the universe operated, coupled with a sense of wonderment.
 
>> he also is quoted as saying:
>> 
>> "I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice." 

The same metaphor.
 
>> also..
>> 
>> "God is subtle but he is not malicious." 

And again.
 
>> but then, Albert Einstein sent a letter to Roosevelt
>> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first
>> 
>> and it launched the atomic bombs!

So?

But I suggest the moron look up "Leo Szilard", who with a few other
leading edge physicists was concerned that Hitler would get the bomb
and use it. Szilard was a friend of Einstein, and Einstein had access
to senior government people.
 
>> That is when Albert Einstein entered The Mind of Satan.

What a fucking moron. 

>> Now, if you believe there is no God, 

Why don't you morons even try to understand what an atheist is before
attacking a straw man?

>>                                                            you're probably in The 
>> Mind of Satan, don't you agree?

What a fucking moron.

>> You certaintly don't want to know God's thoughts, ...

WHAT FUCKING THOUGHTS OF WHAT FUCKING GOD, imbecile? 

>> God is not malicious, Satan is.

WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN, in the real world beyond your
religion, imbecile?
 
>> God is all Good, Satan is all bad...

WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN, in the real world beyond your
religion, imbecile?

>> God is all positive, Satan is all negative.

WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN, in the real world beyond your
religion, imbecile?

>> So, what's it going to be, Heaven or Hell? 

WHAT FUCKING HEAVEN AND WHAT FUCKING HELL, in the real world beyond
your religion, imbecile? 

>> You wanna be a zero all your life, or do you want to be Number 1?

What a fucking moron.
 
>> Those of yous who want to be a zero, step to the left...

Idiot.
 
>> Those of yous who want to be number one, step to your right.

Idiot.
 
>> Do you want to live in the dark side of the moon...or do you 
>> want to live on the bright side of the moon?


You're insane.

>> Just in case you're wondering...Satan lives on the dark side 
>> of the moon.

WHAT FUCKING SATAN?

>> Now, if you're an Atheist..you're probably in The Mind of Satan. 

WHAT FUCKING SATAN?

>> I got good news for you...
>> 
>> God is not to far away...just a few inches...move over to the right.

WHAT FUCKING GOD?
 
>> Now, you're number 1.

Idiot.

>The one thing I know is that God is not.
>
>Just like Satan is not.
>
>They don't exist.
>
>Prove otherwise.

Religion makes people mentally ill.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152479

On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 20:47:21 -0500, Christopher A. Lee wrote:


> 
>>The one thing I know is that God is not.
>>
>>Just like Satan is not.
>>
>>They don't exist.
>>
>>Prove otherwise.
> 
> Religion makes people mentally ill.

Not sure about the arrow of causality, here.  It could be that religion 
attracts those who are already mentally ill, and lets them feel good 
about it.

-- 
MarkA

Whatever you do in life, surround yourself with smart people who'll 
argue with you.   -- John Wooden

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2153713

On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 15:10:11 +0000, MarkA wrote:

> On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 20:47:21 -0500, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>>>The one thing I know is that God is not.
>>>
>>>Just like Satan is not.
>>>
>>>They don't exist.
>>>
>>>Prove otherwise.
>> 
>> Religion makes people mentally ill.
> 
> Not sure about the arrow of causality, here.  It could be that religion
> attracts those who are already mentally ill, and lets them feel good
> about it.

Yep. It's the chicken and egg question again.
Which came first; the mental illness or the religion?

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152486

On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 18:30:04 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit
<youngblood2949@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 12:11:34 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying..
>> 
>> "I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details." 
>> 
>> 
>> he also is quoted as saying:
>> 
>> "I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice." 
>> 
>> also..
>> 
>> "God is subtle but he is not malicious." 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> but then, Albert Einstein sent a letter to Roosevelt
>> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first
>> 
>> and it launched the atomic bombs!
>> 
>> 
>> That is when Albert Einstein entered The Mind of Satan.
>> 
>> 
>> Now, if you believe there is no God, you're probably in The Mind of Satan, don't you agree?
>> 
>> 
>> You certaintly don't want to know God's thoughts, ...
>> 
>> 
>> God is not malicious, Satan is.
>> 
>> 
>> God is all Good, Satan is all bad...
>> 
>> 
>> God is all positive, Satan is all negative.
>> 
>> 
>> So, what's it going to be, Heaven or Hell? 
>> 
>> 
>> You wanna be a zero all your life, or do you want to be Number 1?
>> 
>> 
>> Those of yous who want to be a zero, step to the left...
>> 
>> Those of yous who want to be number one, step to your right.
>> 
>> 
>> Do you want to live in the dark side of the moon...or do you want to live on the bright side of the moon?
>> 
>> 
>> Just in case you're wondering...Satan lives on the dark side of the moon.
>> 
>> 
>> Now, if you're an Atheist..you're probably in The Mind of Satan. I got good news for you...
>> 
>> 
>> God is not to far away...just a few inches...move over to the right.
>> 
>> 
>> Now, you're number 1.
>
>The one thing I know is that God is not.
>
>Just like Satan is not.
>
>They don't exist.
>
>Prove otherwise.
>
...here, let's give the poor fools a hand:

Hundreds of Proofs of God’s Existence
http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/GodProof.htm

TRANSCENDENTAL ARGUMENT, a.k.a. PRESUPPOSITIONALIST (I)
(1) If reason exists then God exists.
(2) Reason exists.
(3) Therefore, God exists.

COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT, a.k.a. FIRST CAUSE ARGUMENT (I)
(1) If I say something must have a cause, it has a cause.
(2) I say the universe must have a cause.
(3) Therefore, the universe has a cause.
(4) Therefore, God exists.

ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT (I)
(1) I define God to be X.
(2) Since I can conceive of X, X must exist.
(3) Therefore, God exists.

ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT (II)
(1) I can conceive of a perfect God.
(2) One of the qualities of perfection is existence.
(3) Therefore, God exists.

MODAL ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) God is either necessary or unnecessary.
(2) God is not unnecessary, therefore God must be necessary.
(3) Therefore, God exists.

ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN, a.k.a. GOD OF THE GAPS, a.k.a. TELEOLOGICAL
ARGUMENT (I)
(1) Check out the world/universe/giraffe.  Isn't it complex?
(2) Only God could have made them so complex.
(3) Therefore, God exists.

ARGUMENT FROM BEAUTY, a.k.a. DESIGN/TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT (II)
(1) Isn't that baby/sunset/flower/tree beautiful?
(2) Only God could have made them so beautiful.
(3) Therefore, God exists.

ARGUMENT FROM MIRACLES (I)
(1) My aunt had cancer.
(2) The doctors gave her all these horrible treatments.
(3) My aunt prayed to God and now she doesn't have cancer.
(4) Therefore, God exists.

MORAL ARGUMENT (I)
(1) Person X, a well-known atheist, was morally inferior to the rest
of us.
(2) Therefore, God exists.

MORAL ARGUMENT (II)
(1) In my younger days I was a cursing, drinking, smoking, gambling,
child-molesting, thieving, murdering, bed-wetting bastard.
(2) That all changed once I became religious.
(3) Therefore, God exists.

ARGUMENT FROM CREATION, a.k.a. ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INCREDULITY (I)
(1) If evolution is false, then creationism is true, and therefore God
exists.
(2) Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to
understand it; moreover, to accept its truth would cause me to be
uncomfortable.
(3) Therefore, God exists.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2152563

On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 11:37:04 AM UTC-4, John Locke wrote:

> >
> ...here, let's give the poor fools a hand:
> 


YOU SAID NOTHING ABOUT LEGAL ARGUMENT, DID YOU?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2153429

On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 3:11:34 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying..
> 
> "I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details." 
> 

And the gods did nothing.

> 
> he also is quoted as saying:
> 
> "I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice." 

And the gods did nothing.

> 
> also..
> 
> "God is subtle but he is not malicious." 

And the gods did nothing.

> 
> 
> 
> but then, Albert Einstein sent a letter to Roosevelt
> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first
> 
> and it launched the atomic bombs!
> 

And the gods did nothing.

> 
> That is when Albert Einstein entered The Mind of Satan.

And the gods did nothing.

> 
> 
> Now, if you believe there is no God, you're probably in The Mind of Satan, don't you agree?

No.

And the gods did nothing.

> 
> 
> You certaintly don't want to know God's thoughts, ...

Which god? 

> 
> 
> God is not malicious, Satan is.

And the gods did nothing.

How is that not malicious of a presumed omnipotent and benevolent god?

> 
> 
> God is all Good, Satan is all bad...

So your god isn't all powerful?

> 
> 
> God is all positive, Satan is all negative.

You agree.

> 
> 
> So, what's it going to be, Heaven or Hell? 
> 

Who knows? Your god, of your own admission, can't stop the bad stuff of his own creation.

> 
> You wanna be a zero all your life, or do you want to be Number 1?

Your #1 is 1/2 evil, according to your very own bull shit.

> 
> 
> Those of yous who want to be a zero, step to the left...
> 
> Those of yous who want to be number one, step to your right.
> 
> 
> Do you want to live in the dark side of the moon...or do you want to live on the bright side of the moon?
> 
> 
> Just in case you're wondering...Satan lives on the dark side of the moon.
> 
> 
> Now, if you're an Atheist..you're probably in The Mind of Satan. I got good news for you...
> 
> 
> God is not to far away...just a few inches...move over to the right.
> 
> 
> Now, you're number 1.


U r an idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism

csiph-web