Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2181432 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bob <null@null.null> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-14 07:49 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-10-16 15:45 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 145 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Bob <null@null.null> - 2016-10-14 07:49 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-10-14 07:04 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-10-14 10:14 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-14 09:43 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-10-14 09:54 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-15 02:47 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 05:40 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-10-15 08:20 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Bob <null@null.null> - 2016-10-15 09:37 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2016-10-15 08:50 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Bob <null@null.null> - 2016-10-15 11:01 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2016-10-15 12:11 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-15 12:19 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Bob <null@null.null> - 2016-10-15 15:57 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Bob <null@null.null> - 2016-10-15 16:09 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-10-15 16:38 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 18:42 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2016-10-15 20:47 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Bob <null@null.null> - 2016-10-16 01:40 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 23:23 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-16 03:10 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., cc4-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-16 05:36 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 12:33 +0000
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-16 08:43 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-10-16 07:33 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Joe Bruno <ajtandy114@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 09:32 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-10-17 15:25 +0000
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-16 03:10 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-16 05:35 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Bob <null@null.null> - 2016-10-16 06:41 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 15:25 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-10-15 16:36 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-15 19:17 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 17:31 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 14:33 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 15:19 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? t2judgment@gmail.com - 2016-10-15 15:22 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-10-16 17:31 +0000
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-10-16 11:15 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-10-17 15:22 +0000
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 15:29 +0000
Bob Flunked Biology Davej <galt_57@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 08:36 -0700
Re: Bob Flunked Biology default <default@defaulter.net> - 2016-10-15 11:38 -0400
Silly Stuff Davej <galt_57@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-15 09:20 -0700
Re: Silly Stuff Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-15 11:38 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-10-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-15 08:53 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-15 09:09 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Vincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com> - 2016-10-15 12:22 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-15 10:28 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Vincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com> - 2016-10-15 15:35 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 15:33 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2016-10-15 12:13 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-15 10:43 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 14:49 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 14:54 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-10-15 16:30 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 18:55 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-15 19:21 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-15 19:20 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 17:37 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-10-17 07:24 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-17 07:33 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2016-10-17 08:23 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-10-17 08:46 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-10-17 15:32 +0000
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., cc4-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-17 11:48 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-17 09:08 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-17 10:10 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., cc4-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-17 12:14 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-10-16 01:07 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-10-16 17:41 +0000
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? harry k <turnkey@q.com> - 2016-10-16 11:16 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-10-16 15:27 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-16 15:39 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? quarke.e2@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Bob <null@null.null> - 2016-10-16 19:34 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? t2judgment@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 16:39 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Bob <null@null.null> - 2016-10-16 19:51 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? t2judgment@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 16:52 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Bob <null@null.null> - 2016-10-16 20:00 -0400
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? t2judgment@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 17:08 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Joe Bruno <ajtandy114@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 12:39 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-10-17 23:59 +0000
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-20 10:23 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 15:30 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? t2judgment@gmail.com - 2016-10-15 15:33 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 17:45 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? t2judgment@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 12:28 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-10-17 15:45 +0000
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-15 17:35 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 17:54 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 23:53 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-10-15 13:44 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-15 17:40 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-16 03:15 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-16 05:31 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-16 00:14 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-10-16 11:38 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Joe Bruno <ajtandy114@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 10:09 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-10-16 15:24 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? t2judgment@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 13:27 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Joe Bruno <ajtandy114@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 10:21 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-10-16 15:25 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-16 15:43 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-16 20:45 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., cc4-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-16 22:55 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-10-17 02:13 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-16 20:45 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? harry k <turnkey@q.com> - 2016-10-15 10:47 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-15 13:10 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 15:00 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? t2judgment@gmail.com - 2016-10-15 15:02 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 17:40 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-16 03:16 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-16 05:30 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 16:06 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-14 09:09 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-10-14 08:57 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-15 09:09 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 14:58 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 15:24 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-15 17:35 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 18:00 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-16 03:13 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-16 05:33 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 18:42 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-10-16 03:12 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-16 05:34 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-16 00:02 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 13:25 +0000
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Africa-Has-No-Boss <africahasnomasters@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 17:03 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 14:52 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-10-15 16:56 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-15 17:25 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-15 18:56 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Ted&Alice <sam.m.tedesco@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 08:48 +0000
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-10-16 08:46 -0500
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 19:51 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? Joe Bruno <ajtandy114@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 04:38 -0700
Re: Does Biology Make Sense Without Darwin? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-10-16 15:45 -0500
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-15 17:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e478ffed-b595-4331-b077-9fe4df944a2d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2182109 |
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 2:30:33 PM UTC-7, Gordon wrote: > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:54:48 -0500, "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden > Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> wrote: > > >"Andrew" <andrew.86remov@usa.net> wrote in > >news:MN2dnSrVw-FU95_FnZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@earthlink.com: > > > >> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message > >> news:XnsA6A27B185400Bnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131... > <snip> > > > > "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so > > simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is > > false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false. > > What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious > > commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than > > a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by > > granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but > > calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an > > enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. > > > I'm not trying to prove anything or stir up a debate but I would like > to understand how atheists and agnostics manage to accept the idea > that the multiverse just popped into existence with no form of > intelligence involved. > Nobody said it just popped into existence. Lie number 1. You have not given any evidence that an intelligence that could have "created" the universe actually exists. > And, while on this topic, how do these people regard the idea that > this cosmic intelligence might exist as in a structure such as quantum > entangled sub-atomic particles that function somewhat like the > synapses of our brain? Such an array of quantum entangled particles > could communicate across the entire multiverse, instantly, and could > have a very precise control of all that is going on, or ever has > happened. Gordon Might exist, but no evidence for such existence exists. Still waiting on any evidence of your imaginary creator or any of the other nonsense you don't seem to understand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 07:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <72g90c9mph29s6nasdf2l3121p00aeemgl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2182173 |
On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:37:16 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> wrote: >On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 2:30:33 PM UTC-7, Gordon wrote: >> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:54:48 -0500, "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden >> Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> wrote: >> >> >"Andrew" <andrew.86remov@usa.net> wrote in >> >news:MN2dnSrVw-FU95_FnZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@earthlink.com: >> > >> >> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >> >> news:XnsA6A27B185400Bnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131... >> <snip> >> > >> > "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so >> > simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is >> > false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false. >> > What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious >> > commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than >> > a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by >> > granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but >> > calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an >> > enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. >> > >> I'm not trying to prove anything or stir up a debate but I would like >> to understand how atheists and agnostics manage to accept the idea >> that the multiverse just popped into existence with no form of >> intelligence involved. > >> >Nobody said it just popped into existence. Lie number 1. > Please explain your assessment as to how the universe came into existence. Gordon > >You have not given any evidence that an intelligence that could have "created" the universe actually exists. > Nor has anyone given any evidence that the universe is, or is not of infinite size, but many are studying this with intense determination to figure it out. Why should we not have a similar level of interest in figuring out whether or not God exists? Gordon > >> And, while on this topic, how do these people regard the idea that >> this cosmic intelligence might exist as in a structure such as quantum >> entangled sub-atomic particles that function somewhat like the >> synapses of our brain? Such an array of quantum entangled particles >> could communicate across the entire multiverse, instantly, and could >> have a very precise control of all that is going on, or ever has >> happened. Gordon > >Might exist, but no evidence for such existence exists. > >Still waiting on any evidence of your imaginary creator or any of the other nonsense you don't seem to understand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 07:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qtg90chhbc3rja10db1d4nv10n63g9ubbs@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2182887 |
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 07:24:39 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:37:16 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit ><youngblood2949@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 2:30:33 PM UTC-7, Gordon wrote: >>> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:54:48 -0500, "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden >>> Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> wrote: >>> >>> >"Andrew" <andrew.86remov@usa.net> wrote in >>> >news:MN2dnSrVw-FU95_FnZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@earthlink.com: >>> > >>> >> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>> >> news:XnsA6A27B185400Bnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131... >>> <snip> >>> > >>> > "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so >>> > simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is >>> > false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false. >>> > What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious >>> > commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than >>> > a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by >>> > granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but >>> > calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an >>> > enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. >>> > >>> I'm not trying to prove anything or stir up a debate but I would like >>> to understand how atheists and agnostics manage to accept the idea >>> that the multiverse just popped into existence with no form of >>> intelligence involved. >> >>> >>Nobody said it just popped into existence. Lie number 1. >> >Please explain your assessment as to how the universe came into >existence. Gordon Asked and answered many times. you dishonest little shit. >>You have not given any evidence that an intelligence that could have >>"created" the universe actually exists. Which you have to do before there is anything to study or investigate, imbecile. Why do you keep pretending this hasn't been explained over and over again? It is YOUR responsibility to show that this is any more worthy of study than an infinite number of equally unjustified propositions/ Which has also been explained to you repeatedly. >Nor has anyone given any evidence that the universe is, or is not of >infinite size, but many are studying this with intense determination >to figure it out. Why should we not have a similar level of interest >in figuring out whether or not God exists? Gordon WHAT FUCKING GOD, in the real world outside your religion, imbecile? >>> And, while on this topic, how do these people regard the idea that >>> this cosmic intelligence might exist as in a structure such as quantum >>> entangled sub-atomic particles that function somewhat like the >>> synapses of our brain? Such an array of quantum entangled particles >>> could communicate across the entire multiverse, instantly, and could >>> have a very precise control of all that is going on, or ever has >>> happened. Gordon Idiot. And if pigs had wings.... >>Might exist, but no evidence for such existence exists. Nor even any reason to suggest it. >>Still waiting on any evidence of your imaginary creator or any of >>the other nonsense you don't seem to understand. Well, moron?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 08:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6A453F5B1A9Anoemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2182887 |
Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote in news:72g90c9mph29s6nasdf2l3121p00aeemgl@4ax.com: >> > Please explain your assessment as to how the universe came into > existence. Gordon >> Please give your assessment of how your deity came into existence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 08:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qvk90c14b6qvc6htdrtn4uefjgrdecrn4u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2182908 |
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:23:56 -0500, Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: >Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote in >news:72g90c9mph29s6nasdf2l3121p00aeemgl@4ax.com: > > >>> >> Please explain your assessment as to how the universe came into >> existence. Gordon >>> > > > Please give your assessment of how your deity >came into existence. > To understand how God came into existence we have to transpose our thinking to God's time scale, eternity. God has the capability to move back and forth as needed along His time scale and it seems that He may have created Himself, using this temporal process. My assessment is that God is a form of cosmic consciousness based upon something like quantum entanglements between subatomic particles. These quantum entanglements function like the synapses in our brain, but are of infinite range and capabilities. These quantum entanglements are not restricted to the speed of light, but communicate instantaneously throughout the multiverse. But, we have no information or superficial understanding as to how this whole process of creation began...God or no God. What kicked off the Big Bang? Where-how did the mass-energy that became the universe originate. What regulated the very intricate process of life creation. There are MANY other such questions that remain unanswered and perhaps unanswerable, but this is no reason for not trying to further understand things in this realm. Gordon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 15:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nu2qv2$j60$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2182913 |
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:46:36 -0500, Gordon wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:23:56 -0500, Mitchell Holman > <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: > >>Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote in >>news:72g90c9mph29s6nasdf2l3121p00aeemgl@4ax.com: >> >>> Please explain your assessment as to how the universe came into >>> existence. Gordon >> >> Please give your assessment of how your deity >>came into existence. >> > To understand how God came into existence we have to transpose our > thinking to God's time scale, eternity. God has the capability to move > back and forth as needed along His time scale and it seems that He may > have created Himself, using this temporal process. Unevidenced, baseless, nonsense excuse. You need to show evidence that your supposed god exists _before_ you can claim it has a different time scale. <snip more nonsense> -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "W.T.S., cc4-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 11:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6A47819ED0A8m14mearthlinknet@216.168.4.170> |
| In reply to | #2182913 |
Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote in
news:qvk90c14b6qvc6htdrtn4uefjgrdecrn4u@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:23:56 -0500, Mitchell Holman
> <noemail@verizont.net> wrote:
>
>>Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote in
>>news:72g90c9mph29s6nasdf2l3121p00aeemgl@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Please explain your assessment as to how the universe came into
>>> existence. Gordon
>>>>
>> Please give your assessment of how your deity
>>came into existence.
>>
> To understand how God came into existence we have to transpose our
> thinking to God's time scale, eternity. God has the capability to move
> back and forth as needed along His time scale and it seems that He may
> have created Himself, using this temporal process.
>
> My assessment is that God is a form of cosmic consciousness based upon
> something like quantum entanglements between subatomic particles.
> These quantum entanglements function like the synapses in our brain,
> but are of infinite range and capabilities. These quantum
> entanglements are not restricted to the speed of light, but
> communicate instantaneously throughout the multiverse.
>
> But, we have no information or superficial understanding as to how
> this whole process of creation began...God or no God. What kicked off
> the Big Bang? Where-how did the mass-energy that became the universe
> originate. What regulated the very intricate process of life creation.
> There are MANY other such questions that remain unanswered and perhaps
> unanswerable, but this is no reason for not trying to further
> understand things in this realm. Gordon
Based on what you're saying, your "Diety" could have little or no
interest in us, could be infinitly indifferent, or even infinitly evil,
or even have the thought processes of a dog. Yet you presume to know
what your "God" thinks or wants. It makes no sense. The only logical
conclusion is that there is no "God" and never will be.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMk>
<http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>
<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falldidit#Falldidit>
<http://tinyurl.com/z4z77ra>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 09:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7fm90ct28jjtomqj9kjj71tibsqff4shtr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2182908 |
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:23:56 -0500, Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: >Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote in >news:72g90c9mph29s6nasdf2l3121p00aeemgl@4ax.com: > > >>> >> Please explain your assessment as to how the universe came into >> existence. Gordon > > Please give your assessment of how your deity >came into existence. Is the moron really this stupid, or just plain dishonest? He has never once taken any notice of the fact that atheists aren't even closet Christians, so he keeps coming up with this mindless stupidity. No matter how often it has been explained to him over a period of many years. He has also been given several scenarios proposed by astrophysicists and cosmologists, many times, which break no known physical laws. He also knows that there is no reason to choose any one of these over the others. The obvious conclusion is that he is seriously mentally ill.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 10:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <UqCdnf45gOZ7mJjFnZ2dnUU7-aXNnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #2182908 |
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:XnsA6A453F5B1A9Anoemailattnet@216.166.97.131...
> Gordon wrote in news:72g90c9mph29s6nasdf2l3121p00aeemgl@4ax.com:
>
>
>> Please explain your assessment as to how the
>> universe came into existence. Gordon
Matter was created by the energy from a super
*omnipotent* entity, our Creator..
> Please give your assessment of how your
> deity came into existence.
You may ask Him yourself when you are
called to stand before Him to answer for
the life He has given to you in this realm.
"For we must all appear before the judgment
seat of Christ, that every one may receive the
things done in his body, according to what
he hath done, whether it be good or evil."
~ 2 Corinthians 5:10
Now is the time for you to prepare to meet
Him in peace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "W.T.S., cc4-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 12:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6A47C92A3307m14mearthlinknet@216.168.4.170> |
| In reply to | #2182999 |
"Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> wrote in
news:UqCdnf45gOZ7mJjFnZ2dnUU7-aXNnZ2d@earthlink.com:
> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
> news:XnsA6A453F5B1A9Anoemailattnet@216.166.97.131...
>> Gordon wrote in news:72g90c9mph29s6nasdf2l3121p00aeemgl@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Please explain your assessment as to how the
>>> universe came into existence. Gordon
>
> Matter was created by the energy from a super
> *omnipotent* entity, our Creator..
>
>> Please give your assessment of how your
>> deity came into existence.
>
> You may ask Him yourself when you are
> called to stand before Him to answer for
> the life He has given to you in this realm.
>
> "For we must all appear before the judgment
> seat of Christ, that every one may receive the
> things done in his body, according to what
> he hath done, whether it be good or evil."
> ~ 2 Corinthians 5:10
>
> Now is the time for you to prepare to meet
> Him in peace.
Bull shit. Here's a dose of truth for you: '
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMk>
<http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>
<http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falldidit#Falldidit>
<http://tinyurl.com/z4z77ra>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 01:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-3203E7.01072916102016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #2182109 |
In article <5i750cdo568tun5jljll9d7lov1qs1ac37@4ax.com>, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:54:48 -0500, "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden > Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> wrote: > > >"Andrew" <andrew.86remov@usa.net> wrote in > >news:MN2dnSrVw-FU95_FnZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@earthlink.com: > > > >> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message > >> news:XnsA6A27B185400Bnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131... > <snip> > > > > "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so > > simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is > > false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false. > > What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious > > commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than > > a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by > > granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but > > calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an > > enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. > > > I'm not trying to prove anything or stir up a debate but I would like > to understand how atheists and agnostics manage to accept the idea > that the multiverse just popped into existence with no form of > intelligence involved. Simple. We're neither stupid nor insane. -- JD "It's not even that the man lies; it's more like he rejects the idea that the point of language is to describe reality."--Desi Lydic, TDS on Trump
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 17:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nu0e3n$sgl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2182109 |
On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 16:30:30 -0500, Gordon wrote: > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:54:48 -0500, "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden > Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> wrote: > >>"Andrew" <andrew.86remov@usa.net> wrote in >>news:MN2dnSrVw-FU95_FnZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@earthlink.com: >> >>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>> news:XnsA6A27B185400Bnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131... > <snip> >> >> "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so >> simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is >> false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false. >> What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious >> commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than >> a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by >> granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but >> calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an >> enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. >> > I'm not trying to prove anything or stir up a debate but I would like to > understand how atheists and agnostics manage to accept the idea that the > multiverse just popped into existence with no form of intelligence > involved. What multiverse, liar? -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 12:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <17f70cdgn33o85hvh11mahfo9df7u2aaj2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2182456 |
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 16:30:30 -0500, Gordon wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:54:48 -0500, "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden >> Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> wrote: >> >>>"Andrew" <andrew.86remov@usa.net> wrote in >>>news:MN2dnSrVw-FU95_FnZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@earthlink.com: >>> >>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>>> news:XnsA6A27B185400Bnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131... >> <snip> >>> >>> "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so >>> simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is >>> false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false. >>> What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious >>> commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than >>> a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by >>> granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but >>> calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an >>> enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. >>> >> I'm not trying to prove anything or stir up a debate but I would like to >> understand how atheists and agnostics manage to accept the idea that the >> multiverse just popped into existence with no form of intelligence >> involved. > >What multiverse, liar? The proven serial liar knows perfectly well that the multiverse is a speculation by astrophysicists and cosmologists, and nothing to do with either atheism or agnosticism. I oldie to know why he keeps posting these unsolicited lies to atheists.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | harry k <turnkey@q.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 11:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <74062cf3-a31f-4aa4-b52e-ea749b726e50@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2182109 |
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 2:30:33 PM UTC-7, Gordon wrote: > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:54:48 -0500, "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden > Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> wrote: > > >"Andrew" <andrew.86remov@usa.net> wrote in > >news:MN2dnSrVw-FU95_FnZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@earthlink.com: > > > >> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message > >> news:XnsA6A27B185400Bnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131... > <snip> > > > > "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so > > simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is > > false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false. > > What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious > > commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than > > a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by > > granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but > > calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an > > enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. > > > I'm not trying to prove anything or stir up a debate but I would like > to understand how atheists and agnostics manage to accept the idea > that the multiverse just popped into existence with no form of > intelligence involved. > > And, while on this topic, how do these people regard the idea that > this cosmic intelligence might exist as in a structure such as quantum > entangled sub-atomic particles that function somewhat like the > synapses of our brain? Such an array of quantum entangled particles > could communicate across the entire multiverse, instantly, and could > have a very precise control of all that is going on, or ever has > happened. Gordon But you swallow whole and lap up the leakage the idea that a god just popped into existence...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 15:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kco70cp4ji0v5jb26mmgs32k2ggele0n64@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2182473 |
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:16:24 -0700 (PDT), harry k <turnkey@q.com> wrote: >On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 2:30:33 PM UTC-7, Gordon wrote: >> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:54:48 -0500, "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden >> Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> wrote: >> >> >"Andrew" <andrew.86remov@usa.net> wrote in >> >news:MN2dnSrVw-FU95_FnZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@earthlink.com: >> > >> >> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >> >> news:XnsA6A27B185400Bnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131... >> <snip> >> > >> > "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so >> > simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is >> > false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false. >> > What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious >> > commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than >> > a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by >> > granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but >> > calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an >> > enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. >> > >> I'm not trying to prove anything or stir up a debate but I would like >> to understand how atheists and agnostics manage to accept the idea >> that the multiverse just popped into existence with no form of >> intelligence involved. >> >> And, while on this topic, how do these people regard the idea that >> this cosmic intelligence might exist as in a structure such as quantum >> entangled sub-atomic particles that function somewhat like the >> synapses of our brain? Such an array of quantum entangled particles >> could communicate across the entire multiverse, instantly, and could >> have a very precise control of all that is going on, or ever has >> happened. Gordon > >But you swallow whole and lap up the leakage the idea that a god just popped into existence... > No, not at all! I acknowledge that we have no understanding as to how God came into existence, but perhaps if we understood the eternity time scale and how God is able to be anywhere along that time scale...move back and forth if needed...maybe it was God who created Himself, and is still, by our time scale, refining and perfecting Himself and all that He created. This is no harder to accept than is the idea that the infinite energy/mass that just popped into existence to form this universe was simply a random event. Gordon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 15:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kpo70c9dbhcofpdqep4ggduiu9448clv07@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2182549 |
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 15:27:50 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:16:24 -0700 (PDT), harry k <turnkey@q.com> >wrote: > >>On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 2:30:33 PM UTC-7, Gordon wrote: >>> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:54:48 -0500, "W.T.S., grU-The Lamp of Golden >>> Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> wrote: >>> >>> >"Andrew" <andrew.86remov@usa.net> wrote in >>> >news:MN2dnSrVw-FU95_FnZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@earthlink.com: >>> > >>> >> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>> >> news:XnsA6A27B185400Bnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131... >>> <snip> >>> > >>> > "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so >>> > simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is >>> > false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false. >>> > What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious >>> > commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than >>> > a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by >>> > granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but >>> > calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an >>> > enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. >>> > >>> I'm not trying to prove anything or stir up a debate but I would like >>> to understand how atheists and agnostics manage to accept the idea >>> that the multiverse just popped into existence with no form of >>> intelligence involved. >>> >>> And, while on this topic, how do these people regard the idea that >>> this cosmic intelligence might exist as in a structure such as quantum >>> entangled sub-atomic particles that function somewhat like the >>> synapses of our brain? Such an array of quantum entangled particles >>> could communicate across the entire multiverse, instantly, and could >>> have a very precise control of all that is going on, or ever has >>> happened. Gordon >> >>But you swallow whole and lap up the leakage the idea that a god >>just popped into existence... >> >No, not at all! I acknowledge that we have no understanding as to how >God came into existence, WHAT FUCKING GOD, imbecile? Are you really so stupid that you don't realise he is merely applying your ridiculous caricature to your pretend friend? > but perhaps if we understood the eternity >time scale and how God is able to be anywhere along that time >scale...move back and forth if needed...maybe it was God who created >Himself, and is still, by our time scale, refining and perfecting >Himself and all that He created. Idiot. >This is no harder to accept than is the idea that the infinite >energy/mass that just popped into existence to form this universe was >simply a random event. Liar. That is a strawman and caricature of one of the many speculations by astrophysicists, which break no known laws of physics. All of which are parsimonious and nobody "believes" any one of them over the others because there's no reason to do so. Unlike your un-necessary, unevidenced and hypothetical god which is packed with a whole slew of unjustified attributes. But provide as much evidence for your pretend friend ah there is for the universe, and apart from the caricature, you might have had a point. >Gordon
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | quarke.e2@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 13:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dd20da67-ede4-4865-a7ea-0b996a71da1c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2182556 |
On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 1:39:48 PM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > WHAT FUCKING GOD, imbecile? The deity of my religion whose armies are dropping nukes on your heads, FUCKHEADED IDIOT MORON!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob <null@null.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 19:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nu12pv$1t5f$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2182558 |
On 10/16/2016 4:43 PM, quarke.e2@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 1:39:48 PM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > >> WHAT FUCKING GOD, imbecile? > > > The deity of my religion whose armies are dropping nukes on your heads, FUCKHEADED IDIOT MORON! > Well, now we know the name of another one of Chrissie's sockpuppets. If he had waited 10 or 15 minutes before responding there might have been some implausibility involved here. But not anymore.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | t2judgment@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 16:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7b93417c-e1f6-4d4d-84d1-983418f2950e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2182636 |
On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 4:34:28 PM UTC-7, Bob wrote: > On 10/16/2016 4:43 PM, quarke.e2@gmail.com wrote: > > On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 1:39:48 PM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > > > >> WHAT FUCKING GOD, imbecile? > > > > > > The deity of my religion whose armies are dropping nukes on your heads, FUCKHEADED IDIOT MORON! > > > > Well, now we know the name of another one of Chrissie's sockpuppets. You mean we know you are full of shit in what you type here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob <null@null.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 19:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nu13pu$1ugd$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2182640 |
On 10/16/2016 7:39 PM, t2judgment@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 4:34:28 PM UTC-7, Bob wrote: >> On 10/16/2016 4:43 PM, quarke.e2@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 1:39:48 PM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: >>> >>>> WHAT FUCKING GOD, imbecile? >>> >>> >>> The deity of my religion whose armies are dropping nukes on your heads, FUCKHEADED IDIOT MORON! >>> >> >> Well, now we know the name of another one of Chrissie's sockpuppets. > > > You mean we know you are full of shit in what you type here. > Make that two names.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web