Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #1961776 > unrolled thread

Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science.

Started byduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
First post2015-08-16 14:16 -0500
Last post2015-08-26 10:33 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 109 — 19 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:16 -0500
    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0700
      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:27 -0500
        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 11:35 -0700
          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-18 14:33 -0500
            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:16 -0500
              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-19 15:19 -0700
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-19 19:27 -0500
                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:02 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-19 20:51 -0500
                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:03 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:01 -0500
                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 12:37 -0700
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-20 20:00 -0700
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:59 -0700
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 13:47 -0500
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-22 11:48 -0700
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:21 -0500
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 13:46 -0500
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 15:37 -0700
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:22 -0500
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 15:46 -0700
          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:13 -0500
            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:09 -0700
              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-20 07:12 -0500
              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:04 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 12:09 -0700
                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 13:54 -0500
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 15:35 -0700
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:28 -0500
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:26 -0700
            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:46 -0400
              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:04 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:46 -0400
                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 13:55 -0500
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-22 12:50 -0700
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:30 -0500
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-23 08:54 -0700
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:30 -0500
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:02 -0700
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:31 -0500
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:28 -0700
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:31 -0500
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:52 -0700
                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 14:25 -0700
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:40 -0400
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:33 -0500
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:41 -0400
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:32 -0500
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:17 -0400
                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:35 -0400
        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-18 19:04 +0000
          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 12:33 -0700
          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:17 -0500
            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:47 -0400
        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:42 +0000
          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:19 -0500
            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2015-08-19 18:30 -0400
              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 21:52 +0800
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 09:39 -0700
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:56 -0400
                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:55 +0800
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 10:14 -0400
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 23:00 +0800
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 12:12 -0400
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 01:28 +0800
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:28 -0700
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 01:41 +0800
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:34 -0500
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:21 +0800
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:43 -0700
                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 11:04 +0800
                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 20:52 -0700
                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:12 +0800
                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:23 -0700
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:34 -0400
                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 20:15 +0800
                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:43 -0400
                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-23 21:25 +0800
                                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:42 -0400
                                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-25 01:01 +0800
                                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:18 -0400
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Planet Visitor II <nappy@nosuchserver.com> - 2015-08-21 22:11 -0400
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 20:39 -0700
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 20:18 +0800
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:37 -0700
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 10:38 +0800
              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:07 -0500
    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:02 -0500
    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:38 -0400
      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-18 13:28 -0500
        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:48 -0400
          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:20 -0500
            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:49 -0400
              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:09 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:49 -0400
                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-21 09:39 -0500
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:26 -0400
                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 13:57 -0500
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2015-08-22 15:08 -0700
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:34 -0500
                    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:45 -0400
                      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:36 -0500
                        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:39 -0400
                          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:33 -0500
                            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:16 -0400
                              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-25 15:57 -0500
                                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:33 -0400
                                  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 10:33 -0500

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

#1961776 — Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science.

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-08-16 14:16 -0500
SubjectRe: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science.
Message-ID<abo1ta11n4b89k4fjd03nm6q2hk8bqfvav@4ax.com>
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:23:56 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 09:48:08 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><60qesahdgkne3pj95u48eqks62hcu08o51@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 05:00:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:20:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>><t2icsahjjj28phblstsuhfthj99abb2cn9@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 04:35:06 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>><h6aasahjll2s2ogo64pmd86t0bmkbqs461@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:07:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>><99n4sap89chr4ckc8dvmiv438r6hpd7otn@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble
>>>>>>>>>"everything', which is hardly a rational answer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You are saturated out.   You can't grasp any more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long
>>>>>>>>>ago.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Much like the one above.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I win, you lose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Is a contest of come kind involved?
>>>>
>>>>Just showing you how much of a minority you are in.
>>
>>>According to you it doesn't matter.  And it really doesn't.
>>
>>You don't have a lot of support.
>>
>More than you would ever admit.
>
>And more every year as education replaces superstition.

And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that
replaces God as supreme creator of all things.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1961795

Fromtalishi <talishi@example.net>
Date2015-08-16 12:25 -0700
Message-ID<mqqo3v1l67@news3.newsguy.com>
In reply to#1961776
On 08/16/2015 12:16 PM, duke wrote:
> And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that
> replaces God as supreme creator of all things.

If reality doesn't need a supreme creator in the first place, then 
there's no need to replace God as that creator.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1963462

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-08-18 13:27 -0500
Message-ID<s5u6ta1rfs88sft525395ofusv3hmj2o8j@4ax.com>
In reply to#1961795
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:25:51 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:

>On 08/16/2015 12:16 PM, duke wrote:
>> And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that
>> replaces God as supreme creator of all things.
>
>If reality doesn't need a supreme creator in the first place, then 
>there's no need to replace God as that creator.

Something from nothing does take a creator, and that is reality.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1963473

Fromnature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-18 11:35 -0700
Message-ID<3e684d74-706b-491c-9908-dfeb244e06fe@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#1963462
On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 11:27:14 AM UTC-7, duke wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:25:51 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:
> 
> >On 08/16/2015 12:16 PM, duke wrote:
> >> And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that
> >> replaces God as supreme creator of all things.
> >
> >If reality doesn't need a supreme creator in the first place, then 
> >there's no need to replace God as that creator.
> 

.> Something from nothing does take a creator, and that is reality.

Why?  And be explicit:





Seth



> 
> the dukester, American-American
> 
> *****
> "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI
> *****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1963521

FromChristopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
Date2015-08-18 14:33 -0500
Message-ID<se17tahg5fb2v72s294k0lk8h5n86dahll@4ax.com>
In reply to#1963473
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 11:35:30 -0700 (PDT), nature bats last
<seqklogw@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 11:27:14 AM UTC-7, duke wrote:
>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:25:51 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:
>> 
>> >On 08/16/2015 12:16 PM, duke wrote:
>> >> And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that
>> >> replaces God as supreme creator of all things.

WHAT FUCKING GOD?

>> >If reality doesn't need a supreme creator in the first place, then 
>> >there's no need to replace God as that creator.

He's been brainwashed into stupidity as well as rudeness towards and
obsession about atheists,

He knows atheists aren't Christians but refuses to admit this,

>.> Something from nothing does take a creator, and that is reality.
>
>Why?  And be explicit:

Liarboi Weber, aka Fatso the Beached Whale, knows this is false
because he and pretty well every other in-your-face religious loon who
has come here have all been given examples from Quantum Mechanics.

Because he knows it is false, that makes him an in-your-face liar
about this and most of the rest of his nonsense..

Since the 1990s.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1964372

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-08-19 17:16 -0500
Message-ID<1uv9tadaepfk09gsrs821r8hlu1pn8hvqf@4ax.com>
In reply to#1963521
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:33:45 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
wrote:

>On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 11:35:30 -0700 (PDT), nature bats last
><seqklogw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 11:27:14 AM UTC-7, duke wrote:
>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:25:51 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> >On 08/16/2015 12:16 PM, duke wrote:
>>> >> And it's a guarantee that you don't have a shred of evidence or education that
>>> >> replaces God as supreme creator of all things.
>
>WHAT FUCKING GOD?
>
>>> >If reality doesn't need a supreme creator in the first place, then 
>>> >there's no need to replace God as that creator.
>
>He's been brainwashed into stupidity as well as rudeness towards and
>obsession about atheists,
>
>He knows atheists aren't Christians but refuses to admit this,

Oh, I know.  But why you do profess such a silly idea.

>>.> Something from nothing does take a creator, and that is reality.

>>Why?  And be explicit:

>Liarboi Weber, aka Fatso the Beached Whale, knows this is false
>because he and pretty well every other in-your-face religious loon who
>has come here have all been given examples from Quantum Mechanics.

Haahaahaa.  Looking for one of those examples.  Remember, "mechanics" is an
action, not a why, not from where.  Heeheehee. 

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1964376

Fromtalishi <talishi@example.net>
Date2015-08-19 15:19 -0700
Message-ID<mr2vd201jom@news3.newsguy.com>
In reply to#1964372
On 08/19/2015 03:16 PM, duke wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:33:45 -0500, Christopher A. Lee<c.lee@fairpoint.net>
> wrote:
>
>> >Liarboi Weber, aka Fatso the Beached Whale, knows this is false
>> >because he and pretty well every other in-your-face religious loon who
>> >has come here have all been given examples from Quantum Mechanics.
> Haahaahaa.  Looking for one of those examples.  Remember, "mechanics" is an
> action, not a why, not from where.  Heeheehee.

Quantum mechanics involves spin.  Duke has trouble with the concept of spin.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1964495

Frombilgat@m.nu
Date2015-08-19 19:27 -0500
Message-ID<7k7ata9o3u51t4p94odu9jn6boaccnra6j@4ax.com>
In reply to#1964376
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:19:13 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net>
wrote:

>On 08/19/2015 03:16 PM, duke wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:33:45 -0500, Christopher A. Lee<c.lee@fairpoint.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> >Liarboi Weber, aka Fatso the Beached Whale, knows this is false
>>> >because he and pretty well every other in-your-face religious loon who
>>> >has come here have all been given examples from Quantum Mechanics.
>> Haahaahaa.  Looking for one of those examples.  Remember, "mechanics" is an
>> action, not a why, not from where.  Heeheehee.
>
>Quantum mechanics involves spin.  Duke has trouble with the concept of spin.

I think that was supposed to be duke has trouble with spinning.... he
is in Louisiana, maybe that is why they have so many hurricanes....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1965132

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-08-20 14:02 -0500
Message-ID<919cta5vcb2dbhjbq93iu0sfi74dpeaojq@4ax.com>
In reply to#1964495
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:27:14 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote:

>On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:19:13 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On 08/19/2015 03:16 PM, duke wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:33:45 -0500, Christopher A. Lee<c.lee@fairpoint.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> >Liarboi Weber, aka Fatso the Beached Whale, knows this is false
>>>> >because he and pretty well every other in-your-face religious loon who
>>>> >has come here have all been given examples from Quantum Mechanics.
>>> Haahaahaa.  Looking for one of those examples.  Remember, "mechanics" is an
>>> action, not a why, not from where.  Heeheehee.
>>
>>Quantum mechanics involves spin.  Duke has trouble with the concept of spin.
>
>I think that was supposed to be duke has trouble with spinning.... he
>is in Louisiana, maybe that is why they have so many hurricanes....

A hurricane rotates.  

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1964541

FromChristopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
Date2015-08-19 20:51 -0500
Message-ID<thcatatrmqodebge93o233lds4uklgh1q2@4ax.com>
In reply to#1964376
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:19:13 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net>
wrote:

>On 08/19/2015 03:16 PM, duke wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:33:45 -0500, Christopher A. Lee<c.lee@fairpoint.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> >Liarboi Weber, aka Fatso the Beached Whale, knows this is false
>>> >because he and pretty well every other in-your-face religious loon who
>>> >has come here have all been given examples from Quantum Mechanics.
>> Haahaahaa.  Looking for one of those examples.  Remember, "mechanics" is an
>> action, not a why, not from where.  Heeheehee.

What a fucking moron.

>Quantum mechanics involves spin.  Duke has trouble with the concept of spin.

The proven serial liar has been given the Casimir effect many times.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1965134

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-08-20 14:03 -0500
Message-ID<j29ctahmvciqhb1qjajd7il64tljoprvtu@4ax.com>
In reply to#1964541
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:51:12 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
wrote:

>On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:19:13 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On 08/19/2015 03:16 PM, duke wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:33:45 -0500, Christopher A. Lee<c.lee@fairpoint.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> >Liarboi Weber, aka Fatso the Beached Whale, knows this is false
>>>> >because he and pretty well every other in-your-face religious loon who
>>>> >has come here have all been given examples from Quantum Mechanics.
>>> Haahaahaa.  Looking for one of those examples.  Remember, "mechanics" is an
>>> action, not a why, not from where.  Heeheehee.
>
>What a fucking moron.

Couldn't refute it, could you.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1965131

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-08-20 14:01 -0500
Message-ID<ia8cta1i726ljik6qhtk1ukro6lbs8i2i3@4ax.com>
In reply to#1964376
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:19:13 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:

>On 08/19/2015 03:16 PM, duke wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:33:45 -0500, Christopher A. Lee<c.lee@fairpoint.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> >Liarboi Weber, aka Fatso the Beached Whale, knows this is false
>>> >because he and pretty well every other in-your-face religious loon who
>>> >has come here have all been given examples from Quantum Mechanics.
>> Haahaahaa.  Looking for one of those examples.  Remember, "mechanics" is an
>> action, not a why, not from where.  Heeheehee.
>
>Quantum mechanics involves spin.  Duke has trouble with the concept of spin.
 
A child's top spins.  A ball on a string does not rotate.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1965159

Fromnature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-20 12:37 -0700
Message-ID<d44777dd-3797-40a4-b8bd-7562dfb3b9da@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#1965131
On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 12:01:35 PM UTC-7, duke wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:19:13 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:
> 
> >On 08/19/2015 03:16 PM, duke wrote:
> >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:33:45 -0500, Christopher A. Lee<c.lee@fairpoint.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> >Liarboi Weber, aka Fatso the Beached Whale, knows this is false
> >>> >because he and pretty well every other in-your-face religious loon who
> >>> >has come here have all been given examples from Quantum Mechanics.
> >> Haahaahaa.  Looking for one of those examples.  Remember, "mechanics" is an
> >> action, not a why, not from where.  Heeheehee.
> >

.> >Quantum mechanics involves spin.  Duke has trouble with the concept of pin.
>  

.> A child's top spins.  A ball on a string does not rotate.

Which does and which does not is entirely a matter
of your choice of inertial frame of reference.
And you're choosing inconsistently there.

But talishi is right in what he(?) said, because
spin in quantum mechanics is not remotely the same as
spin of a top.  Two entirely different concepts.


Seth


> 
> the dukester, American-American
> 
> *****
> "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI
> *****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1965453

Fromtalishi <talishi@example.net>
Date2015-08-20 20:00 -0700
Message-ID<mr64a905gt@news6.newsguy.com>
In reply to#1965159
On 08/20/2015 12:37 PM, nature bats last wrote:
> But talishi is right in what he(?) said, because
> spin in quantum mechanics is not remotely the same as
> spin of a top.  Two entirely different concepts.

She.

And you're right about quantum spin, my spin comment was a bit of snark.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1965493

Fromnature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-20 20:59 -0700
Message-ID<91452c83-0b0c-4a1e-bcaf-3e397520ee2d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#1965453
On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 8:01:06 PM UTC-7, talishi wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 12:37 PM, nature bats last wrote:

,> > But talishi is right in what he(?) said, because
,> > spin in quantum mechanics is not remotely the same as
,> > spin of a top.  Two entirely different concepts.
 
.> She.

Ah.  OK.
> 
> And you're right about quantum spin, my spin comment was a bit of snark.

Seth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1966755

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-08-22 13:47 -0500
Message-ID<5tghta5q4dc0kb8kujcboomb3bi9rq99kc@4ax.com>
In reply to#1965453
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:00:15 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:

>On 08/20/2015 12:37 PM, nature bats last wrote:
>> But talishi is right in what he(?) said, because
>> spin in quantum mechanics is not remotely the same as
>> spin of a top.  Two entirely different concepts.
>
>She.
>
>And you're right about quantum spin, my spin comment was a bit of snark.

Actually, you also talked about pin.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1966758

Fromtalishi <talishi@example.net>
Date2015-08-22 11:48 -0700
Message-ID<mrag5r02a29@news3.newsguy.com>
In reply to#1966755
On 08/22/2015 11:47 AM, duke wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:00:15 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net>  wrote:
>
>> >On 08/20/2015 12:37 PM, nature bats last wrote:
>>> >>But talishi is right in what he(?) said, because
>>> >>spin in quantum mechanics is not remotely the same as
>>> >>spin of a top.  Two entirely different concepts.
>> >
>> >She.
>> >
>> >And you're right about quantum spin, my spin comment was a bit of snark.
> Actually, you also talked about pin.

Not in any message from me.  Maybe someone did some snippage.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1967703

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-08-23 10:21 -0500
Message-ID<q6pjta5ptqibt8m07lvtdc9amjdh1qamav@4ax.com>
In reply to#1966758
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:48:27 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:

>On 08/22/2015 11:47 AM, duke wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:00:15 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net>  wrote:
>>
>>> >On 08/20/2015 12:37 PM, nature bats last wrote:
>>>> >>But talishi is right in what he(?) said, because
>>>> >>spin in quantum mechanics is not remotely the same as
>>>> >>spin of a top.  Two entirely different concepts.
>>> >
>>> >She.
>>> >
>>> >And you're right about quantum spin, my spin comment was a bit of snark.
>> Actually, you also talked about pin.
>
>Not in any message from me.  Maybe someone did some snippage.

Ok.  It was nbl.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1966754

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2015-08-22 13:46 -0500
Message-ID<6pghtatn1kd6en4shka2lsepfp25s4b8gj@4ax.com>
In reply to#1965159
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:37:07 -0700 (PDT), nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 12:01:35 PM UTC-7, duke wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:19:13 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:
>> 
>> >On 08/19/2015 03:16 PM, duke wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:33:45 -0500, Christopher A. Lee<c.lee@fairpoint.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> >Liarboi Weber, aka Fatso the Beached Whale, knows this is false
>> >>> >because he and pretty well every other in-your-face religious loon who
>> >>> >has come here have all been given examples from Quantum Mechanics.
>> >> Haahaahaa.  Looking for one of those examples.  Remember, "mechanics" is an
>> >> action, not a why, not from where.  Heeheehee.
>> >
>
>.> >Quantum mechanics involves spin.  Duke has trouble with the concept of pin.
>>  
>
>.> A child's top spins.  A ball on a string does not rotate.

>Which does and which does not is entirely a matter
>of your choice of inertial frame of reference.
>And you're choosing inconsistently there.

Then you're none too bright engineering wise.

>But talishi is right in what he(?) said, because
>spin in quantum mechanics is not remotely the same as
>spin of a top.  Two entirely different concepts.

Never said it was.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1967052

Fromnature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-22 15:37 -0700
Message-ID<bd76db65-625a-4b43-adf7-d38b96d447bb@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#1966754
On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 11:46:51 AM UTC-7, duke wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:37:07 -0700 (PDT), nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 12:01:35 PM UTC-7, duke wrote:
> >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:19:13 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >On 08/19/2015 03:16 PM, duke wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:33:45 -0500, Christopher A. Lee<c.lee@fairpoint.net>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> >Liarboi Weber, aka Fatso the Beached Whale, knows this is false
> >> >>> >because he and pretty well every other in-your-face religious loon who
> >> >>> >has come here have all been given examples from Quantum Mechanics.
> >> >> Haahaahaa.  Looking for one of those examples.  Remember, "mechanics" is an
> >> >> action, not a why, not from where.  Heeheehee.
> >> >
> >
> >.> >Quantum mechanics involves spin.  Duke has trouble with the concept of pin.
> >>  
> >
> >.> A child's top spins.  A ball on a string does not rotate.
> 
> >Which does and which does not is entirely a matter
> >of your choice of inertial frame of reference.
> >And you're choosing inconsistently there.
> 
> Then you're none too bright engineering wise.
> 

.
.> >But talishi is right in what he(?) said, because
.> >spin in quantum mechanics is not remotely the same as
.> >spin of a top.  Two entirely different concepts.
 
.> Never said it was.

In any event, it's nice to run across someone
in this group who actually knows a little
20th century physics.

A competence  talishi has demonstrated elsewhere
in this group.




Seth

> 
> the dukester, American-American
> 
> *****
> "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI
> *****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism

csiph-web