Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2588051 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-29 01:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-29 19:35 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 513 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 01:20 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Vachagan Robert Yengibaryan <I_suck_Mark_Wieber@taft.ca> - 2019-01-28 17:55 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 01:59 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Vachagan Robert Yengibaryan <I_suck_Mark_Wieber@taft.ca> - 2019-01-28 18:06 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 02:16 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-28 23:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 21:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 06:42 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 23:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 08:29 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:35 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:36 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:37 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:32 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 16:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 08:28 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 08:21 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 11:25 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 20:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-29 12:50 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 16:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:21 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:29 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "malkinmichelle6@gmail.com" <malkinmichelle6@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 09:46 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:07 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 09:59 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:34 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:05 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:08 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:30 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 15:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 15:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 15:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:02 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:21 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 19:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 20:02 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:09 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:05 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:04 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 13:02 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:09 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:32 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:23 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:29 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 20:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 13:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 16:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 15:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:09 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 17:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:21 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:11 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:37 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 02:06 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:07 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 02:14 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:28 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:29 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:31 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 02:16 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-29 22:13 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:28 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-30 02:49 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:02 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 15:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:10 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:35 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:21 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:32 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:11 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 23:42 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:29 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:26 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 12:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 12:36 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:13 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:10 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:14 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 23:42 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 21:44 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 17:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:21 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 20:11 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 08:27 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 08:22 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-29 10:16 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 12:52 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 11:26 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 12:54 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 20:27 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 07:52 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:49 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 12:42 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 14:30 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 20:38 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-30 18:54 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 20:44 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-29 11:01 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-29 13:46 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-29 13:48 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 20:34 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 07:54 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:51 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 20:40 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 07:58 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:01 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 12:48 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 14:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 20:42 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:00 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 11:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-29 11:19 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 12:47 -0700
Re: โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-29 14:16 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 12:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 12:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:35 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 16:58 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:15 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:28 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:36 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-29 17:49 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 20:10 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:52 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 04:23 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-30 04:36 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-30 04:35 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:46 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 08:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:03 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 10:03 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:58 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:18 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:01 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:02 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:35 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 09:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:03 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 10:05 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:52 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:52 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:32 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:32 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:27 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:46 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:17 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:20 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 11:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 15:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 15:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:00 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "malkinmichelle6@gmail.com" <malkinmichelle6@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 09:40 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:53 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:35 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 20:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 21:44 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:01 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:16 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:49 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:19 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 10:10 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 13:00 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 13:09 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:46 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 14:29 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 23:58 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 15:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 16:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:21 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:18 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:49 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 02:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:07 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:48 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-29 23:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:48 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:57 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 04:23 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 05:20 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 05:30 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress bruce2bowser@gmail.com - 2019-01-30 04:24 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:11 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 07:56 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 14:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:49 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 20:59 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 00:11 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 13:04 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 13:08 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 14:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 13:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:28 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 21:01 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 12:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:52 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 11:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 15:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:49 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:35 -0700
Page 17 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 26 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 14:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gbekvnFpthnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2589186 |
On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: > On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>> cut. >>> >>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>> the oath of office. >>> >> >> Started about eight years before he took office. > > LIAR. Prove it. > Prove it. Easy to show the trend started under Obama: https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy ----- So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch โ including small business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth โ broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. ----- I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax cut claims were lies. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good economy. That is BAD news. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 15:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bbd736a28d18f3fbb@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2589357 |
In article <gbekvnFpthnU1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>> cut. >>>> >>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>> the oath of office. >>>> >>> >>> Started about eight years before he took office. >> >> LIAR. > >Prove it. > >> Prove it. > >Easy to show the trend started under Obama: > >https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >----- >So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch ? including small >business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth ? >broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >----- > >I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? > >And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >cut claims were lies. > >https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html > >Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >economy. That is BAD news. > >... Still drinking the Obama lies?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 18:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <d1c45elo93c9hkkra9u5fkrt9hefe9uok5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2589357 |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>> cut. >>>> >>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>> the oath of office. >>>> >>> >>> Started about eight years before he took office. >> >> LIAR. > >Prove it. > >> Prove it. > >Easy to show the trend started under Obama: > >https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >----- >So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch โ including small >business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth โ >broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >----- > >I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? > >And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >cut claims were lies. > >https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html > >Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >economy. That is BAD news. Did you post any real facts here? Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all gone in the right direction. If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 16:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <buq15e.3q8.17.13@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #2589453 |
On 2019-01-30 4:18 p.m., Patrick wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>> cut. >>>>> >>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>> the oath of office. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>> >>> LIAR. >> >> Prove it. >> >>> Prove it. >> >> Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >> >> https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >> ----- >> So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >> indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch โ including small >> business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth โ >> broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >> continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >> ----- >> >> I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >> >> And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >> that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >> cut claims were lies. >> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >> >> Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >> economy. That is BAD news. > > > Did you post any real facts here? > Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all > gone in the right direction. > If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. > I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. > what's a yout
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 06:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mbl55e5crn2gksiu97j6ghps0bsurtckif@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2589467 |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:22:51 -0700, Patrick wrote: >On 2019-01-30 4:18 p.m., Patrick wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>>> cut. >>>>>> >>>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>>> the oath of office. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>>> >>>> LIAR. >>> >>> Prove it. >>> >>>> Prove it. >>> >>> Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >>> >>> https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >>> ----- >>> So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >>> indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch โ including small >>> business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth โ >>> broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >>> continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >>> ----- >>> >>> I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >>> >>> And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >>> that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >>> cut claims were lies. >>> >>> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >>> >>> Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >>> economy. That is BAD news. >> >> >> Did you post any real facts here? >> Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all >> gone in the right direction. >> If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. >> I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. >> >what's a yout shadup larry.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 16:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gbeq0iFqsqbU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2589453 |
On 1/30/19 4:18 PM, Patrick wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>> cut. >>>>> >>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>> the oath of office. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>> >>> LIAR. >> >> Prove it. >> >>> Prove it. >> >> Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >> >> https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >> ----- >> So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >> indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch โ including small >> business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth โ >> broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >> continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >> ----- >> >> I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >> >> And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >> that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >> cut claims were lies. >> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >> >> Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >> economy. That is BAD news. > > Did you post any real facts here? Of course. And of course you will ignore them. > Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all > gone in the right direction. The momentum has not broken from the Obama years... and that is commendable. > If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. > I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 06:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8dl55e507lqf5sb4qj8h6guba8d7ks5sum@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2589472 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >The momentum has not broken from the Obama years... and that is >commendable. Your only way up from the bottom of a hole.... is up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 17:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bbede62e5a2418fd5@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2589453 |
In article <d1c45elo93c9hkkra9u5fkrt9hefe9uok5@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 @woh.rr.com says... > >On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit ><usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>> cut. >>>>> >>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>> the oath of office. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>> >>> LIAR. >> >>Prove it. >> >>> Prove it. >> >>Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >> >>https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >>----- >>So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >>indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch ? including small >>business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth ? >>broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >>continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >>----- >> >>I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >> >>And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >>that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >>cut claims were lies. >> >>https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >> >>Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >>economy. That is BAD news. > > >Did you post any real facts here? >Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all >gone in the right direction. What about the farmers and the tariffs? >If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. >I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. That was weak cupcake, please try harder.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 06:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ifl55ept7gshmeqdfe3oabbgh0son0tjmo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2589541 |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:23:20 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >In article <d1c45elo93c9hkkra9u5fkrt9hefe9uok5@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >@woh.rr.com says... >> >>On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit >><usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>>On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>>> cut. >>>>>> >>>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>>> the oath of office. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>>> >>>> LIAR. >>> >>>Prove it. >>> >>>> Prove it. >>> >>>Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >>> >>>https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >>>----- >>>So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >>>indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch ? including small >>>business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth ? >>>broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >>>continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >>>----- >>> >>>I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >>> >>>And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >>>that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >>>cut claims were lies. >>> >>>https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >>> >>>Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >>>economy. That is BAD news. >> >> >>Did you post any real facts here? >>Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all >>gone in the right direction. > >What about the farmers and the tariffs? They are in progress. The office of the president cannot do everything all at once. >>If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. >>I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. >That was weak cupcake, please try harder. I'm getting tired. I am old.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 08:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bcc5d1907cfef8ffb@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2589818 |
In article <ifl55ept7gshmeqdfe3oabbgh0son0tjmo@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 @woh.rr.com says... > >On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:23:20 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >wrote: > >>In article <d1c45elo93c9hkkra9u5fkrt9hefe9uok5@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >>@woh.rr.com says... >>> >>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit >>><usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>>>> cut. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>>>> the oath of office. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>>>> >>>>> LIAR. >>>> >>>>Prove it. >>>> >>>>> Prove it. >>>> >>>>Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >>>> >>>>https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >>>>----- >>>>So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >>>>indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch ? including small >>>>business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth ? >>>>broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >>>>continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >>>>----- >>>> >>>>I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >>>> >>>>And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >>>>that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >>>>cut claims were lies. >>>> >>>>https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >>>> >>>>Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >>>>economy. That is BAD news. >>> >>> >>>Did you post any real facts here? >>>Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all >>>gone in the right direction. >> >>What about the farmers and the tariffs? > >They are in progress. >The office of the president cannot do everything all at once. > > >>>If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. >>>I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. > >>That was weak cupcake, please try harder. > >I'm getting tired. I am old. Same excuse used everytime he fails.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 09:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bb80457f1defa8f57@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2589128 |
In article <hji35edqlrllsqrm4l882o6dntavc6kjgj@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 @woh.rr.com says... > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>cut. > >The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >the oath of office. You mean the Russian collusion and the racism?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 09:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gbe28rFlopkU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2589151 |
On 1/30/19 9:35 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <hji35edqlrllsqrm4l882o6dntavc6kjgj@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 > @woh.rr.com says... >> >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>> cut. >> >> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >> the oath of office. > > You mean the Russian collusion and the racism? The racism started earlier than that. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 09:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bb84a58aba2742f67@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2589152 |
In article <gbe28rFlopkU1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 1/30/19 9:35 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <hji35edqlrllsqrm4l882o6dntavc6kjgj@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >> @woh.rr.com says... >>> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>> cut. >>> >>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>> the oath of office. >> >> You mean the Russian collusion and the racism? > >The racism started earlier than that. I have never seen any from him, but I guess majority rules.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 08:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bb6dd015abb102f42@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2589075 |
In article <j7a35el4e8k0vfq7rkubohpt5p9porosgb@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 @woh.rr.com says... > >On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 05:30:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >wrote: > >>In article <k1035eh62mj60cm1utmhc5fekfim305rmn@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >>@woh.rr.com says... >>> >>>Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> Look at the stats of the country today compared to 2016. >>> >>>>Patrick was not able to back his claims. Got it. >>> >>>How many times do I have to post the leading economic factors here in >>>America... unemployment, Bull Market, etc. >>>Be a man. Look them up yourself. >> >>Don't make claims you can't back. Trump did that and now look at him. > >Prove me wrong! > >US Jobless Rate Down to Near 49-Year Low of 3.7% >The unemployment rate in the US declined to 3.7 percent in September >of 2018 from 3.9 percent in each of the previous two months and below >market expectations of 3.8 percent. It is the lowest jobless rate >since December of 1969. The number of unemployed persons decreased by >270,000 to 6.0 million. Over the year, the unemployment rate and the >number of unemployed persons declined by 0.5 percentage point and >795,000, respectively. >Published on 2018-10-05 >https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate > >https://www.macrotrends.net/1316/us-national-unemployment-rate > >Dow Jones Jan 2016: 15099. >Dow Jones Jan 2019: 24569 > >http://forexcentral.info/dow-jones-futures > >+++ >How about a CNN report from late 2017: > >It's hard to find fault with the latest jobs numbers. The unemployment >rate is 4.3%, a 16-year low. The economy has added more than 1 million >jobs since Trump took office. >(HINT: The numbers are even lower today!!) >https://money.cnn.com/2017/08/07/investing/trump-economy-report-card/index.html > >Housing prices >They're red hot. >The average price for an existing home in June was a record $263,800, >or 6.5% higher than a year ago. June was the 64th consecutive month of >gains compared with a year earlier. > > >Lending >Consumers aren't borrowing just to buy homes. They're taking on debt >for cars and using credit cards for lots of other things. >Americans had $3.843 trillion in loans outstanding in May, up from >$3.766 trillion at the end of last year, according to the Fed. >And businesses are borrowing more, reversing a trend from earlier this >year. That could be a good sign for Trump and the economy. Consumers >can't prop up the economy alone: Companies need to pull their weight >and invest. > >Consumer spending >Spending has increased 2.8% over the past 12 months, a bit below the >3% pace many experts feel is necessary to keep the economy on track. > > >Trade >Trump wants more consumers -- in the United States and around the >globe -- to buy American. And it looks like that's starting to happen. >The trade deficit fell slightly in June from three months ago, to >$43.6 billion. That's the lowest since just before the election. >America's suddenly vibrant oil industry is a big reason the balance is >shifting. Thanks to technologies like fracking, the United States >exported more crude in June and imported less. >Exports to Canada and Mexico rose in June, too, a possible sign that >Trump's tough talk is working with America's two big North American >trading partners. > >Stocks >An undeniable win for the president. Fears of a market collapse under >Trump have proved to be misguided. >The Dow keeps hitting records and is up 12% this year. (2017) >(Hint: it is much higher this year.) > >CNNMoney (New York) >First published August 7, 2017: 3:29 PM ET All rightard garbage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 11:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7mi35elamgqi18o61bossrdvq8o3q6pioo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2589106 |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:16:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >In article <j7a35el4e8k0vfq7rkubohpt5p9porosgb@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >@woh.rr.com says... >> >>On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 05:30:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>wrote: >> >>>In article <k1035eh62mj60cm1utmhc5fekfim305rmn@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >>>@woh.rr.com says... >>>> >>>>Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Look at the stats of the country today compared to 2016. >>>> >>>>>Patrick was not able to back his claims. Got it. >>>> >>>>How many times do I have to post the leading economic factors here in >>>>America... unemployment, Bull Market, etc. >>>>Be a man. Look them up yourself. >>> >>>Don't make claims you can't back. Trump did that and now look at him. >> >>Prove me wrong! >> >>US Jobless Rate Down to Near 49-Year Low of 3.7% >>The unemployment rate in the US declined to 3.7 percent in September >>of 2018 from 3.9 percent in each of the previous two months and below >>market expectations of 3.8 percent. It is the lowest jobless rate >>since December of 1969. The number of unemployed persons decreased by >>270,000 to 6.0 million. Over the year, the unemployment rate and the >>number of unemployed persons declined by 0.5 percentage point and >>795,000, respectively. >>Published on 2018-10-05 >>https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate >> >>https://www.macrotrends.net/1316/us-national-unemployment-rate >> >>Dow Jones Jan 2016: 15099. >>Dow Jones Jan 2019: 24569 >> >>http://forexcentral.info/dow-jones-futures >> >>+++ >>How about a CNN report from late 2017: >> >>It's hard to find fault with the latest jobs numbers. The unemployment >>rate is 4.3%, a 16-year low. The economy has added more than 1 million >>jobs since Trump took office. >>(HINT: The numbers are even lower today!!) >>https://money.cnn.com/2017/08/07/investing/trump-economy-report-card/index.html >> >>Housing prices >>They're red hot. >>The average price for an existing home in June was a record $263,800, >>or 6.5% higher than a year ago. June was the 64th consecutive month of >>gains compared with a year earlier. >> >> >>Lending >>Consumers aren't borrowing just to buy homes. They're taking on debt >>for cars and using credit cards for lots of other things. >>Americans had $3.843 trillion in loans outstanding in May, up from >>$3.766 trillion at the end of last year, according to the Fed. >>And businesses are borrowing more, reversing a trend from earlier this >>year. That could be a good sign for Trump and the economy. Consumers >>can't prop up the economy alone: Companies need to pull their weight >>and invest. >> >>Consumer spending >>Spending has increased 2.8% over the past 12 months, a bit below the >>3% pace many experts feel is necessary to keep the economy on track. >> >> >>Trade >>Trump wants more consumers -- in the United States and around the >>globe -- to buy American. And it looks like that's starting to happen. >>The trade deficit fell slightly in June from three months ago, to >>$43.6 billion. That's the lowest since just before the election. >>America's suddenly vibrant oil industry is a big reason the balance is >>shifting. Thanks to technologies like fracking, the United States >>exported more crude in June and imported less. >>Exports to Canada and Mexico rose in June, too, a possible sign that >>Trump's tough talk is working with America's two big North American >>trading partners. >> >>Stocks >>An undeniable win for the president. Fears of a market collapse under >>Trump have proved to be misguided. >>The Dow keeps hitting records and is up 12% this year. (2017) >>(Hint: it is much higher this year.) >> >>CNNMoney (New York) >>First published August 7, 2017: 3:29 PM ET > >All rightard garbage. Prove it. With facts. Troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 10:05 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <Zb2dnURDncGwVszBnZ2dnUU7-RXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #2589129 |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:03:37 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <7mi35elamgqi18o61bossrdvq8o3q6pioo@4ax.com>: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:16:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก wrote: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก In article <j7a35el4e8k0vfq7rkubohpt5p9porosgb@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก @woh.rr.com says... โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 05:30:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก wrote: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก In article <k1035eh62mj60cm1utmhc5fekfim305rmn@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก @woh.rr.com says... โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Look at the stats of the country today compared to 2016. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Patrick was not able to back his claims. Got it. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก How many times do I have to post the leading economic factors here in โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก America... unemployment, Bull Market, etc. Be a man. Look them up โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก yourself. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Don't make claims you can't back. Trump did that and now look at him. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Prove me wrong! US Jobless Rate Down to Near 49-Year Low of 3.7% The โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก unemployment rate in the US declined to 3.7 percent in September of โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก 2018 from 3.9 percent in each of the previous two months and below โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก market expectations of 3.8 percent. It is the lowest jobless rate since โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก December of 1969. The number of unemployed persons decreased by 270,000 โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก to 6.0 million. Over the year, the unemployment rate and the number of โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก unemployed persons declined by 0.5 percentage point and 795,000, โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก respectively. Published on 2018-10-05 โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก https://www.macrotrends.net/1316/us-national-unemployment-rate Dow โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Jones Jan 2016: 15099. Dow Jones Jan 2019: 24569 โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก http://forexcentral.info/dow-jones-futures +++ How about a CNN report โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก from late 2017: It's hard to find fault with the latest jobs numbers. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก The unemployment rate is 4.3%, a 16-year low. The economy has added โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก more than 1 million jobs since Trump took office. (HINT: The numbers โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก are even lower today!!) โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก https://money.cnn.com/2017/08/07/investing/trump-economy-report-card/in โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก dex.html Housing prices They're red hot. The average price for an โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก existing home in June was a record $263,800, or 6.5% higher than a year โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก ago. June was the 64th consecutive month of gains compared with a year โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก earlier. Lending Consumers aren't borrowing just to buy homes. They're โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก taking on debt for cars and using credit cards for lots of other โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก things. Americans had $3.843 trillion in loans outstanding in May, up โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก from $3.766 trillion at the end of last year, according to the Fed. And โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก businesses are borrowing more, reversing a trend from earlier this โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก year. That could be a good sign for Trump and the economy. Consumers โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก can't prop up the economy alone: Companies need to pull their weight โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก and invest. Consumer spending Spending has increased 2.8% over the past โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก 12 months, a bit below the 3% pace many experts feel is necessary to โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก keep the economy on track. Trade Trump wants more consumers -- in the โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก United States and around the globe -- to buy American. And it looks โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก like that's starting to happen. The trade deficit fell slightly in June โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก from three months ago, to $43.6 billion. That's the lowest since just โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก before the election. America's suddenly vibrant oil industry is a big โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก reason the balance is shifting. Thanks to technologies like fracking, โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก the United States exported more crude in June and imported less. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Exports to Canada and Mexico rose in June, too, a possible sign that โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Trump's tough talk is working with America's two big North American โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก trading partners. Stocks An undeniable win for the president. Fears of โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก a market collapse under Trump have proved to be misguided. The Dow keeps โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก hitting records and is up 12% this year. (2017) (Hint: it is much โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก higher this year.) CNNMoney (New York) First published August 7, 2017: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก 3:29 PM ET โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก All rightard garbage. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Prove it. With facts. Troll. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก closing the government for over a month really stimulates an economy. -- [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECKยฎ VALIDATION] THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gbe1d0Flj5dU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2589129 |
Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:16:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> > wrote: > >> In article <j7a35el4e8k0vfq7rkubohpt5p9porosgb@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >> @woh.rr.com says... >>> >>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 05:30:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <k1035eh62mj60cm1utmhc5fekfim305rmn@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >>>> @woh.rr.com says... >>>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Look at the stats of the country today compared to 2016. >>>>> >>>>>> Patrick was not able to back his claims. Got it. >>>>> >>>>> How many times do I have to post the leading economic factors here in >>>>> America... unemployment, Bull Market, etc. >>>>> Be a man. Look them up yourself. >>>> >>>> Don't make claims you can't back. Trump did that and now look at him. >>> >>> Prove me wrong! >>> >>> US Jobless Rate Down to Near 49-Year Low of 3.7% >>> The unemployment rate in the US declined to 3.7 percent in September >>> of 2018 from 3.9 percent in each of the previous two months and below >>> market expectations of 3.8 percent. It is the lowest jobless rate >>> since December of 1969. The number of unemployed persons decreased by >>> 270,000 to 6.0 million. Over the year, the unemployment rate and the >>> number of unemployed persons declined by 0.5 percentage point and >>> 795,000, respectively. >>> Published on 2018-10-05 >>> https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate >>> >>> https://www.macrotrends.net/1316/us-national-unemployment-rate >>> >>> Dow Jones Jan 2016: 15099. >>> Dow Jones Jan 2019: 24569 >>> >>> http://forexcentral.info/dow-jones-futures >>> >>> +++ >>> How about a CNN report from late 2017: >>> >>> It's hard to find fault with the latest jobs numbers. The unemployment >>> rate is 4.3%, a 16-year low. The economy has added more than 1 million >>> jobs since Trump took office. >>> (HINT: The numbers are even lower today!!) >>> https://money.cnn.com/2017/08/07/investing/trump-economy-report-card/index.html >>> >>> Housing prices >>> They're red hot. >>> The average price for an existing home in June was a record $263,800, >>> or 6.5% higher than a year ago. June was the 64th consecutive month of >>> gains compared with a year earlier. >>> >>> >>> Lending >>> Consumers aren't borrowing just to buy homes. They're taking on debt >>> for cars and using credit cards for lots of other things. >>> Americans had $3.843 trillion in loans outstanding in May, up from >>> $3.766 trillion at the end of last year, according to the Fed. >>> And businesses are borrowing more, reversing a trend from earlier this >>> year. That could be a good sign for Trump and the economy. Consumers >>> can't prop up the economy alone: Companies need to pull their weight >>> and invest. >>> >>> Consumer spending >>> Spending has increased 2.8% over the past 12 months, a bit below the >>> 3% pace many experts feel is necessary to keep the economy on track. >>> >>> >>> Trade >>> Trump wants more consumers -- in the United States and around the >>> globe -- to buy American. And it looks like that's starting to happen. >>> The trade deficit fell slightly in June from three months ago, to >>> $43.6 billion. That's the lowest since just before the election. >>> America's suddenly vibrant oil industry is a big reason the balance is >>> shifting. Thanks to technologies like fracking, the United States >>> exported more crude in June and imported less. >>> Exports to Canada and Mexico rose in June, too, a possible sign that >>> Trump's tough talk is working with America's two big North American >>> trading partners. >>> >>> Stocks >>> An undeniable win for the president. Fears of a market collapse under >>> Trump have proved to be misguided. >>> The Dow keeps hitting records and is up 12% this year. (2017) >>> (Hint: it is much higher this year.) >>> >>> CNNMoney (New York) >>> First published August 7, 2017: 3:29 PM ET >> >> All rightard garbage. > > Prove it. > With facts. > Troll. > He denied basic science. He loathes equal rights. He wants a wall he cannot define not show value of. He does not care if his court nominees are qualified. He has more business ties in his White House despite his promise to โDrain the swampโ. He pushed a massive tax cut for the rich with no way to fund it. He alienates our allies as he cozies up to Putin. He disrespected and harms our military by using them for political stunts and by showing faces of special forces. He does not care about the environment. He keeps losing key personal. He attacks the media โ which a Democracy needs to be healthy. He backs white supremacy. He lies about the Russian investigation and tries to obstruct justice. On and on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 09:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bb81c248c008b7f5b@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2589138 |
In article <gbe1d0Flj5dU1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:16:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> In article <j7a35el4e8k0vfq7rkubohpt5p9porosgb@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >>> @woh.rr.com says... >>>> >>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 05:30:46 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <k1035eh62mj60cm1utmhc5fekfim305rmn@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >>>>> @woh.rr.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Look at the stats of the country today compared to 2016. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Patrick was not able to back his claims. Got it. >>>>>> >>>>>> How many times do I have to post the leading economic factors here in >>>>>> America... unemployment, Bull Market, etc. >>>>>> Be a man. Look them up yourself. >>>>> >>>>> Don't make claims you can't back. Trump did that and now look at him. >>>> >>>> Prove me wrong! >>>> >>>> US Jobless Rate Down to Near 49-Year Low of 3.7% >>>> The unemployment rate in the US declined to 3.7 percent in September >>>> of 2018 from 3.9 percent in each of the previous two months and below >>>> market expectations of 3.8 percent. It is the lowest jobless rate >>>> since December of 1969. The number of unemployed persons decreased by >>>> 270,000 to 6.0 million. Over the year, the unemployment rate and the >>>> number of unemployed persons declined by 0.5 percentage point and >>>> 795,000, respectively. >>>> Published on 2018-10-05 >>>> https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate >>>> >>>> https://www.macrotrends.net/1316/us-national-unemployment-rate >>>> >>>> Dow Jones Jan 2016: 15099. >>>> Dow Jones Jan 2019: 24569 >>>> >>>> http://forexcentral.info/dow-jones-futures >>>> >>>> +++ >>>> How about a CNN report from late 2017: >>>> >>>> It's hard to find fault with the latest jobs numbers. The unemployment >>>> rate is 4.3%, a 16-year low. The economy has added more than 1 million >>>> jobs since Trump took office. >>>> (HINT: The numbers are even lower today!!) >>>> https://money.cnn.com/2017/08/07/investing/trump-economy-report-card/index.html >>>> >>>> Housing prices >>>> They're red hot. >>>> The average price for an existing home in June was a record $263,800, >>>> or 6.5% higher than a year ago. June was the 64th consecutive month of >>>> gains compared with a year earlier. >>>> >>>> >>>> Lending >>>> Consumers aren't borrowing just to buy homes. They're taking on debt >>>> for cars and using credit cards for lots of other things. >>>> Americans had $3.843 trillion in loans outstanding in May, up from >>>> $3.766 trillion at the end of last year, according to the Fed. >>>> And businesses are borrowing more, reversing a trend from earlier this >>>> year. That could be a good sign for Trump and the economy. Consumers >>>> can't prop up the economy alone: Companies need to pull their weight >>>> and invest. >>>> >>>> Consumer spending >>>> Spending has increased 2.8% over the past 12 months, a bit below the >>>> 3% pace many experts feel is necessary to keep the economy on track. >>>> >>>> >>>> Trade >>>> Trump wants more consumers -- in the United States and around the >>>> globe -- to buy American. And it looks like that's starting to happen. >>>> The trade deficit fell slightly in June from three months ago, to >>>> $43.6 billion. That's the lowest since just before the election. >>>> America's suddenly vibrant oil industry is a big reason the balance is >>>> shifting. Thanks to technologies like fracking, the United States >>>> exported more crude in June and imported less. >>>> Exports to Canada and Mexico rose in June, too, a possible sign that >>>> Trump's tough talk is working with America's two big North American >>>> trading partners. >>>> >>>> Stocks >>>> An undeniable win for the president. Fears of a market collapse under >>>> Trump have proved to be misguided. >>>> The Dow keeps hitting records and is up 12% this year. (2017) >>>> (Hint: it is much higher this year.) >>>> >>>> CNNMoney (New York) >>>> First published August 7, 2017: 3:29 PM ET >>> >>> All rightard garbage. >> >> Prove it. >> With facts. >> Troll. >> > >He denied basic science. > >He loathes equal rights. > >He wants a wall he cannot define not show value of. > >He does not care if his court nominees are qualified. > >He has more business ties in his White House despite his promise to ?Drain >the swamp?. > >He pushed a massive tax cut for the rich with no way to fund it. > >He alienates our allies as he cozies up to Putin. > >He disrespected and harms our military by using them for political stunts >and by showing faces of special forces. > >He does not care about the environment. > >He keeps losing key personal. > >He attacks the media ? which a Democracy needs to be healthy. > >He backs white supremacy. > >He lies about the Russian investigation and tries to obstruct justice. > >On and on. Yea! What he said.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 12:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <uko35eldq8e9fngkohkcbqa55j7vpg06ol@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2589138 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>> How about a CNN report from late 2017: >>>> >>>> It's hard to find fault with the latest jobs numbers. The unemployment >>>> rate is 4.3%, a 16-year low. The economy has added more than 1 million >>>> jobs since Trump took office. >>>> (HINT: The numbers are even lower today!!) >>>> https://money.cnn.com/2017/08/07/investing/trump-economy-report-card/index.html >>>> >>>> Housing prices >>>> They're red hot. >>>> The average price for an existing home in June was a record $263,800, >>>> or 6.5% higher than a year ago. June was the 64th consecutive month of >>>> gains compared with a year earlier. >>>> >>>> >>>> Lending >>>> Consumers aren't borrowing just to buy homes. They're taking on debt >>>> for cars and using credit cards for lots of other things. >>>> Americans had $3.843 trillion in loans outstanding in May, up from >>>> $3.766 trillion at the end of last year, according to the Fed. >>>> And businesses are borrowing more, reversing a trend from earlier this >>>> year. That could be a good sign for Trump and the economy. Consumers >>>> can't prop up the economy alone: Companies need to pull their weight >>>> and invest. >>>> >>>> Consumer spending >>>> Spending has increased 2.8% over the past 12 months, a bit below the >>>> 3% pace many experts feel is necessary to keep the economy on track. >>>> >>>> >>>> Trade >>>> Trump wants more consumers -- in the United States and around the >>>> globe -- to buy American. And it looks like that's starting to happen. >>>> The trade deficit fell slightly in June from three months ago, to >>>> $43.6 billion. That's the lowest since just before the election. >>>> America's suddenly vibrant oil industry is a big reason the balance is >>>> shifting. Thanks to technologies like fracking, the United States >>>> exported more crude in June and imported less. >>>> Exports to Canada and Mexico rose in June, too, a possible sign that >>>> Trump's tough talk is working with America's two big North American >>>> trading partners. >>>> >>>> Stocks >>>> An undeniable win for the president. Fears of a market collapse under >>>> Trump have proved to be misguided. >>>> The Dow keeps hitting records and is up 12% this year. (2017) >>>> (Hint: it is much higher this year.) >>>> >>>> CNNMoney (New York) >>>> First published August 7, 2017: 3:29 PM ET >>> >>> All rightard garbage. >> >> Prove it. >> With facts. >> Troll. >> > >He denied basic science. Prove it. >He loathes equal rights. Prove it. >He wants a wall he cannot define not show value of. Prove it. >He does not care if his court nominees are qualified. All of them are qualified. More than qualified. Just wait a bit. Ginsberg is on her last legs. trump will really pack the Supreme Court. Then you can be pissed for decades. >He has more business ties in his White House despite his promise to โDrain >the swampโ. He has always had business ties. He is a Billionaire and a businessman. >He pushed a massive tax cut for the rich with no way to fund it. And corporations will now have an incentive to stay in the USA rather than relocate to Ireland, Haiti, or elsewhere. >He alienates our allies as he cozies up to Putin. Trump confronts them with bills they should be paying. This includes the UN and NATO. >He disrespected and harms our military by using them for political stunts >and by showing faces of special forces. Huh? WTF are you talking about? >He does not care about the environment. It is not as important as other priorities. And why should America be the only major country to follow the green peace accords? >He keeps losing key personal. He wears them out. When I was in the military, I lost 1/3rd of my work force every year. It is good to tear out the weeds and search for better fruit. >He attacks the media โ which a Democracy needs to be healthy. Only if the media didn't attack his wife, his kids, his every decision, or make up fake shit news. >He backs white supremacy. Prove it. >He lies about the Russian investigation and tries to obstruct justice. Prove it. > >On and on. Prove it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 12:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bbad176f706b15f7f@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2589191 |
In article <uko35eldq8e9fngkohkcbqa55j7vpg06ol@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 @woh.rr.com says... >All of them are qualified. >More than qualified. >Just wait a bit. >Ginsberg is on her last legs. >trump will really pack the Supreme Court. >Then you can be pissed for decades. > When he gets impeached the left will clean house.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 26 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web