Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2588051 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-29 01:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-29 19:35 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 513 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 01:20 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Vachagan Robert Yengibaryan <I_suck_Mark_Wieber@taft.ca> - 2019-01-28 17:55 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 01:59 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Vachagan Robert Yengibaryan <I_suck_Mark_Wieber@taft.ca> - 2019-01-28 18:06 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 02:16 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-28 23:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 21:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 06:42 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 23:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 08:29 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:35 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:36 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:37 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:32 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 16:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 08:28 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 08:21 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 11:25 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 20:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-29 12:50 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 16:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:21 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:29 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "malkinmichelle6@gmail.com" <malkinmichelle6@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 09:46 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:07 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 09:59 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:34 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:05 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:08 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:30 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 15:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 15:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 15:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:02 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:21 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 19:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 20:02 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:09 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:05 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:04 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 13:02 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:09 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:32 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:23 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:29 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 20:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 13:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 16:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 15:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:09 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 17:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:21 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:11 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:37 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 02:06 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:07 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 02:14 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:28 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:29 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:31 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 02:16 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-29 22:13 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:28 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-30 02:49 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:02 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 15:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:10 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:35 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:21 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:32 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:11 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 23:42 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:29 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:26 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 12:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 12:36 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:13 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:10 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:14 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 23:42 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 21:44 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 17:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:21 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 20:11 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 08:27 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 08:22 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-29 10:16 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 12:52 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 11:26 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 12:54 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 20:27 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 07:52 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:49 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 12:42 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 14:30 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 20:38 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-30 18:54 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 20:44 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-29 11:01 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-29 13:46 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-29 13:48 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 20:34 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 07:54 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:51 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-29 20:40 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 07:58 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:01 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 12:48 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 14:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 20:42 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:00 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 11:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-29 11:19 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 12:47 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-29 14:16 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 12:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 12:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:35 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 16:58 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:15 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:28 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:36 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-29 17:49 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 20:10 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:52 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 04:23 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-30 04:36 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-30 04:35 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:46 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 08:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:03 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 10:03 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:58 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:18 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:01 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:02 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:35 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 09:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:03 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 10:05 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:52 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:52 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:32 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:32 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:27 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:46 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:17 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:20 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 11:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 15:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 15:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:00 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "malkinmichelle6@gmail.com" <malkinmichelle6@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 09:40 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:53 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:35 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 20:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 21:44 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:01 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:16 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:49 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:19 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 10:10 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 13:00 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 13:09 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:46 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 14:29 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 23:58 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 15:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 16:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:21 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:18 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:49 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 02:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:07 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:48 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-29 23:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:48 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:57 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 04:23 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 05:20 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 05:30 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress bruce2bowser@gmail.com - 2019-01-30 04:24 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:11 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 07:56 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 14:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:49 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 20:59 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 00:11 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 13:04 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 13:08 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 14:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 13:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:28 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 21:01 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 12:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:52 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 11:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 15:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:49 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:35 -0700
Page 14 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 26 Next page →
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 13:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <DQ34E.158172$e75.77656@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #2588534 |
On 1/29/2019 1:44 PM, Patrick wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:01:26 -0800, Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> > wrote: > >> On 1/29/2019 8:26 AM, Patrick wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:22:32 -0600, Mitchell Holman >>> <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in >>>> news:9rk05el1mtnih8k9mhpli09eni2nq4v1q7@4ax.com: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises... and >>>>> since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they refuse to do >>>>> ANY negotiating. >>>> >>>> >>>> You mean the "...and Mexico will pay for it" wall? >>>> >>>> How is that coming along? >>> >>> The savings we have made since NAFTA (was cancelled) has almost paid >>> for it. >> >> NAFTA was never canceled, and it would not result in any "savings" even if >> it were. You're full of shit. > > > The Economic Policy Institute says that NAFTA cost the jobs of about > 680,000 people in the US. That's complete bullshit. EPI is a left-wing advocacy group. NAFTA *created* jobs in the USA.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 13:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <IS34E.158398$e75.40172@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #2588534 |
On 1/29/2019 1:44 PM, Patrick wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:01:26 -0800, Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> > wrote: > >> On 1/29/2019 8:26 AM, Patrick wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:22:32 -0600, Mitchell Holman >>> <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in >>>> news:9rk05el1mtnih8k9mhpli09eni2nq4v1q7@4ax.com: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises... and >>>>> since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they refuse to do >>>>> ANY negotiating. >>>> >>>> >>>> You mean the "...and Mexico will pay for it" wall? >>>> >>>> How is that coming along? >>> >>> The savings we have made since NAFTA (was cancelled) has almost paid >>> for it. >> >> NAFTA was never canceled, and it would not result in any "savings" even if >> it were. You're full of shit. > > > The Economic Policy Institute says that NAFTA cost the jobs of about > 680,000 people in the US. A lie. NAFTA created job in the USA on net https://qz.com/914363/nafta-created-thousands-of-good-american-jobs-just-not-for-trumps-rust-belt-supporters/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 20:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E6D1492D7E4noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2588534 |
Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
news:m6i15e9jk8chctmd5ki07f36u4r5r6neda@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:01:26 -0800, Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con>
> wrote:
>
>>On 1/29/2019 8:26 AM, Patrick wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:22:32 -0600, Mitchell Holman
>>> <noemail@verizont.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
>>>> news:9rk05el1mtnih8k9mhpli09eni2nq4v1q7@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises...
>>>>> and since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they refuse
>>>>> to do ANY negotiating.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You mean the "...and Mexico will pay for it" wall?
>>>>
>>>> How is that coming along?
>>>
>>> The savings we have made since NAFTA (was cancelled) has almost
>>> paid for it.
>>
>>NAFTA was never canceled, and it would not result in any "savings"
>>even if it were. You're full of shit.
>
>
> The Economic Policy Institute says that NAFTA cost the jobs of about
> 680,000 people in the US. The Department of Labor used to keep track
> of job losses because people who could show that they lost their job
> because it was moved to Mexico were entitled to get extended
> unemployment benefits. By the time Bush became president, that number
> had already reached about half a million people and Bush told the
> Department of Labor to stop counting because it was becoming
> politically embarrassing for all the politicians who had voted for the
> treaty.
>
> There is no question that NAFTA did have an impact on people here and
> in many ways it led to a kind of displacement here that was similar to
> what we saw during the Depression, with people coming from the
> Dustbowl, but also what we are seeing with people coming here from
> Mexico.
>
> In 1992, independent presidential candidate Ross Perot predicted that
> the North American Free Trade Agreement would produce a "giant sucking
> sound" of U.S. jobs fleeing to low-wage Mexico.
>
> A quarter-century later, another billionaire businessman, Republican
> presidential front-runner Donald Trump is picking up where Perot left
> off by bashing NAFTA and other trade agreements as bad deals for
> America and its workers. "I think NAFTA has been a disaster. I think
> our current deals are a disaster," Trump told CNN last year.
>
> Recently, he has been joined in his attacks by Democratic candidate
> Bernie Sanders, whose message resonates in states, such as Michigan,
> that have lost manufacturing jobs to foreign trading partners ranging
> from Mexico to China. “Our disastrous trade policies for the past 30
> or 40 years have had a horrendous impact on the lives of millions of
> working Americans,” Sanders tweeted on March 16.
The preceding has been lifted in it's entirety from:
https://kpfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Nov_07_2017.pdf
Back to your old plagiarism ways, Patrick?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 05:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <csv25e1gph1g1gtpvh2pff8cqjg3ios5fl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2588782 |
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:34:02 -0600, Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: >Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in >news:m6i15e9jk8chctmd5ki07f36u4r5r6neda@4ax.com: > >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:01:26 -0800, Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> >> wrote: >> >>>On 1/29/2019 8:26 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:22:32 -0600, Mitchell Holman >>>> <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in >>>>> news:9rk05el1mtnih8k9mhpli09eni2nq4v1q7@4ax.com: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises... >>>>>> and since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they refuse >>>>>> to do ANY negotiating. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You mean the "...and Mexico will pay for it" wall? >>>>> >>>>> How is that coming along? >>>> >>>> The savings we have made since NAFTA (was cancelled) has almost >>>> paid for it. >>> >>>NAFTA was never canceled, and it would not result in any "savings" >>>even if it were. You're full of shit. >> >> >> The Economic Policy Institute says that NAFTA cost the jobs of about >> 680,000 people in the US. The Department of Labor used to keep track >> of job losses because people who could show that they lost their job >> because it was moved to Mexico were entitled to get extended >> unemployment benefits. By the time Bush became president, that number >> had already reached about half a million people and Bush told the >> Department of Labor to stop counting because it was becoming >> politically embarrassing for all the politicians who had voted for the >> treaty. >> >> There is no question that NAFTA did have an impact on people here and >> in many ways it led to a kind of displacement here that was similar to >> what we saw during the Depression, with people coming from the >> Dustbowl, but also what we are seeing with people coming here from >> Mexico. >> >> In 1992, independent presidential candidate Ross Perot predicted that >> the North American Free Trade Agreement would produce a "giant sucking >> sound" of U.S. jobs fleeing to low-wage Mexico. >> >> A quarter-century later, another billionaire businessman, Republican >> presidential front-runner Donald Trump is picking up where Perot left >> off by bashing NAFTA and other trade agreements as bad deals for >> America and its workers. "I think NAFTA has been a disaster. I think >> our current deals are a disaster," Trump told CNN last year. >> >> Recently, he has been joined in his attacks by Democratic candidate >> Bernie Sanders, whose message resonates in states, such as Michigan, >> that have lost manufacturing jobs to foreign trading partners ranging >> from Mexico to China. “Our disastrous trade policies for the past 30 >> or 40 years have had a horrendous impact on the lives of millions of >> working Americans,” Sanders tweeted on March 16. > > > The preceding has been lifted in it's entirety from: > >https://kpfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Nov_07_2017.pdf > > Back to your old plagiarism ways, Patrick? If you would spend more time in debating the issue, rather than searching for the Ross Perot statements made .... maybe we could talk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 07:54 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E750801E6A3noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2588976 |
Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
news:csv25e1gph1g1gtpvh2pff8cqjg3ios5fl@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:34:02 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> <noemail@verizont.net> wrote:
>
>>Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
>>news:m6i15e9jk8chctmd5ki07f36u4r5r6neda@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:01:26 -0800, Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 1/29/2019 8:26 AM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:22:32 -0600, Mitchell Holman
>>>>> <noemail@verizont.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:9rk05el1mtnih8k9mhpli09eni2nq4v1q7@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises...
>>>>>>> and since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they
refuse
>>>>>>> to do ANY negotiating.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean the "...and Mexico will pay for it" wall?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How is that coming along?
>>>>>
>>>>> The savings we have made since NAFTA (was cancelled) has almost
>>>>> paid for it.
>>>>
>>>>NAFTA was never canceled, and it would not result in any "savings"
>>>>even if it were. You're full of shit.
>>>
>>>
>>> The Economic Policy Institute says that NAFTA cost the jobs of about
>>> 680,000 people in the US. The Department of Labor used to keep track
>>> of job losses because people who could show that they lost their job
>>> because it was moved to Mexico were entitled to get extended
>>> unemployment benefits. By the time Bush became president, that
number
>>> had already reached about half a million people and Bush told the
>>> Department of Labor to stop counting because it was becoming
>>> politically embarrassing for all the politicians who had voted for
the
>>> treaty.
>>>
>>> There is no question that NAFTA did have an impact on people here and
>>> in many ways it led to a kind of displacement here that was similar
to
>>> what we saw during the Depression, with people coming from the
>>> Dustbowl, but also what we are seeing with people coming here from
>>> Mexico.
>>>
>>> In 1992, independent presidential candidate Ross Perot predicted that
>>> the North American Free Trade Agreement would produce a "giant
sucking
>>> sound" of U.S. jobs fleeing to low-wage Mexico.
>>>
>>> A quarter-century later, another billionaire businessman, Republican
>>> presidential front-runner Donald Trump is picking up where Perot left
>>> off by bashing NAFTA and other trade agreements as bad deals for
>>> America and its workers. "I think NAFTA has been a disaster. I think
>>> our current deals are a disaster," Trump told CNN last year.
>>>
>>> Recently, he has been joined in his attacks by Democratic candidate
>>> Bernie Sanders, whose message resonates in states, such as Michigan,
>>> that have lost manufacturing jobs to foreign trading partners ranging
>>> from Mexico to China. “Our disastrous trade policies for the past 30
>>> or 40 years have had a horrendous impact on the lives of millions of
>>> working Americans,” Sanders tweeted on March 16.
>>
>>
>> The preceding has been lifted in it's entirety from:
>>
>>https://kpfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Nov_07_2017.pdf
>>
>> Back to your old plagiarism ways, Patrick?
>
> If you would spend more time in debating the issue, rather than
> searching for the Ross Perot statements made .... maybe we could talk.
Would it kill you to acknowledge the source
of the material you try to pass off here as your
own?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 10:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <osh35e18g3odo21le59ml8j78orkb29nfj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2589066 |
Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: > Would it kill you to acknowledge the source >of the material you try to pass off here as your >own? When I post facts, why does it matter where they came from? They are facts. If I were to post some outlandish opinions of some other guy, I should at least recognize where I got the opinion. Facts are facts. No matter where they came from.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 20:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E6D26857CAAnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2588534 |
Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
news:m6i15e9jk8chctmd5ki07f36u4r5r6neda@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:01:26 -0800, Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con>
> wrote:
>
>>On 1/29/2019 8:26 AM, Patrick wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:22:32 -0600, Mitchell Holman
>>> <noemail@verizont.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
>>>> news:9rk05el1mtnih8k9mhpli09eni2nq4v1q7@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises...
>>>>> and since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they refuse
>>>>> to do ANY negotiating.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You mean the "...and Mexico will pay for it" wall?
>>>>
>>>> How is that coming along?
>>>
>>> The savings we have made since NAFTA (was cancelled) has almost
>>> paid for it.
>>
>>NAFTA was never canceled, and it would not result in any "savings"
>>even if it were. You're full of shit.
>
>
> The Economic Policy Institute says that NAFTA cost the jobs of about
> 680,000 people in the US. The Department of Labor used to keep track
> of job losses because people who could show that they lost their job
> because it was moved to Mexico were entitled to get extended
> unemployment benefits. By the time Bush became president, that number
> had already reached about half a million people and Bush told the
> Department of Labor to stop counting because it was becoming
> politically embarrassing for all the politicians who had voted for the
> treaty.
>
> There is no question that NAFTA did have an impact on people here and
> in many ways it led to a kind of displacement here that was similar to
> what we saw during the Depression, with people coming from the
> Dustbowl, but also what we are seeing with people coming here from
> Mexico.
>
> In 1992, independent presidential candidate Ross Perot predicted that
> the North American Free Trade Agreement would produce a "giant sucking
> sound" of U.S. jobs fleeing to low-wage Mexico.
>
> A quarter-century later, another billionaire businessman, Republican
> presidential front-runner Donald Trump is picking up where Perot left
> off by bashing NAFTA and other trade agreements as bad deals for
> America and its workers. "I think NAFTA has been a disaster. I think
> our current deals are a disaster," Trump told CNN last year.
>
> Recently, he has been joined in his attacks by Democratic candidate
> Bernie Sanders, whose message resonates in states, such as Michigan,
> that have lost manufacturing jobs to foreign trading partners ranging
> from Mexico to China. “Our disastrous trade policies for the past 30
> or 40 years have had a horrendous impact on the lives of millions of
> working Americans,” Sanders tweeted on March 16.
NAFTA wasn't so bad when Trump was - and still
IS - taking advantage of it to have his clothing
line made in Mexico instead of hiring Americans.
So much for "America First", right?
Donald Trump: I Never Disputed That Some of My
Clothing Line Was Made in Mexico
October 19, 2015
http://tinyurl.com/jkf92lv
Donald Trump's Menswear Line Is Made in Mexico
Aug 24, 2015
http://tinyurl.com/oos7nfo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 05:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8vv25ehg3csommaecfe59326ipqr541608@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2588796 |
Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: > NAFTA wasn't so bad when Trump was - and still >IS - taking advantage of it to have his clothing >line made in Mexico instead of hiring Americans. > > So much for "America First", right? Trump wasn't a politician then. He was a businessman.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 07:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E751464BAB9noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2588977 |
Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
news:8vv25ehg3csommaecfe59326ipqr541608@4ax.com:
> Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote:
>
>> NAFTA wasn't so bad when Trump was - and still
>>IS - taking advantage of it to have his clothing
>>line made in Mexico instead of hiring Americans.
>>
>> So much for "America First", right?
>
> Trump wasn't a politician then. He was a businessman.
Then?
Trump ties and suits are STILL
being made in Mexico. And China, and
Bangledesh. Even as Trump was demanding
that other "businessmen" bring their
jobs back from abroad HE was exporting
the jobs HE created.
Hypocrite much?
Trump's 'Made in America' week: the president's
hypocrisy is on display
July 20 2017
"We don’t need Chinese products," Trump told Fox
News in 2010. "The stuff that’s been sent over
from China is – it falls apart after a year and
a half. It’s crap."
It was an odd thing to say for a self-described
master businessman offering to the American public
many menswear products – featured in the Donald J
Trump Signature Collection – that were made in China.
Donald J Trump eyeglasses were made in China. Donald
Trump’s ties were made in China. Some of the Donald J
Trump suits were made in China. To be fair, Trump is
an equal opportunity overseas manufacturer. His dress
shirts have been manufactured in Bangladesh, Honduras
and Vietnam. And China.
http://tinyurl.com/ydbbp9su
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 11:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <00i35e14tf9eqjf01uicn37n7edh427pk3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2589067 |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:58:59 -0600, Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: >Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in >news:8vv25ehg3csommaecfe59326ipqr541608@4ax.com: > >> Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: >> >>> NAFTA wasn't so bad when Trump was - and still >>>IS - taking advantage of it to have his clothing >>>line made in Mexico instead of hiring Americans. >>> >>> So much for "America First", right? >> >> Trump wasn't a politician then. He was a businessman. > > > Then? > > Trump ties and suits are STILL >being made in Mexico. And China, and >Bangledesh. + Prove it. This is your claim. I don't believe it. https://shop.donaldjtrump.com/?utm_source=google_store_text&utm_medium=ad&utm_campaign=20170717_store_maga-merch-search_djt_tmagac&utm_content=gop_merchandise&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI6-Wnre6V4AIVz0oNCh2DAAMEEAAYASAAEgJumvD_BwE Trump's official campaign gear is all made in the U.S. The 'Make America Great Again' hats, for instance, are made in Southern California. + Being a large scale businessman, I am pretty sure Trump does not go out to determine where each product with his name on it is now produced or made in America. He took advantage of all the laws that the liberals passed in the past pertaining to taxing corporations. Do you really care where an avacado was grown? I guess the question is: "Why do you care?" >Even as Trump was demanding >that other "businessmen" bring their >jobs back from abroad HE was exporting >the jobs HE created. > Hypocrite much? Nope. Trump's business interests are being managed by corporate vice presidents who are responsible to Trump and the stockholders to make money. Why do the big corporations send jobs overseas? Can you figure that out yet? Has Trump done anything to stop this outflow? Do you remember his latest tax cuts?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 12:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E7826313832noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2589127 |
Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
news:00i35e14tf9eqjf01uicn37n7edh427pk3@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:58:59 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> <noemail@verizont.net> wrote:
>
>>Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
>>news:8vv25ehg3csommaecfe59326ipqr541608@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> NAFTA wasn't so bad when Trump was - and still
>>>>IS - taking advantage of it to have his clothing
>>>>line made in Mexico instead of hiring Americans.
>>>>
>>>> So much for "America First", right?
>>>
>>> Trump wasn't a politician then. He was a businessman.
>>
>>
>> Then?
>>
>> Trump ties and suits are STILL
>>being made in Mexico. And China, and
>>Bangledesh.
>
> + Prove it.
> This is your claim.
> I don't believe it.
Donald Trump: I Never Disputed That Some of My
Clothing Line Was Made in Mexico
October 19, 2015
http://tinyurl.com/jkf92lv
Donald Trump's Menswear Line Is Made in Mexico
Aug 24, 2015
http://tinyurl.com/oos7nfo
Donald Trump suits and ties are made in China
March 8, 2016
http://tinyurl.com/jdlk8eu
Donald Trump shirts are made in Bangledesh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYoOPgeTMQc
> https://shop.donaldjtrump.com/?utm_source=google_store_text&utm_medium=
> ad&utm_campaign=20170717_store_maga-merch-search_djt_tmagac&utm_content
> =gop_merchandise&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI6-Wnre6V4AIVz0oNCh2DAAMEEAAYASAAEgJu
> mvD_BwE
>
> Trump's official campaign gear is all made in the U.S.
Wrong.
Trump 2020 campaign banners are being
proudly produced in . . . China?
July 25, 2018
Manufacturers are already hard at work
churning out banners for President Donald
Trump’s 2020 re-election campaign — in
China.
According to a Reuters report Wednesday,
China’s Jiahao Flag Co. has produced more
than 90,000 "Trump 2020: Keep America Great!"
banners and flags since March, and the factory
has ramped up production before Trump’s
threatened tariffs against all Chinese-made
goods kick on.
The banners and flags cost about $1 each to
make, Reuters said, and a factory manager said
Trump’s campaign suppliers appear to be trying
to get their orders in before potential tariffs
cause the price to rise.
http://tinyurl.com/y8jnuvln
The 'Make
> America Great Again' hats, for instance, are made in Southern
> California.
>
Trump Inauguration hats made in Vietnam
http://tinyurl.com/gkset93
> + Being a large scale businessman, I am pretty sure Trump does not go
> out to determine where each product with his name on it is now
> produced or made in America. He took advantage of all the laws that
> the liberals passed in the past pertaining to taxing corporations. Do
> you really care where an avacado was grown?
> I guess the question is: "Why do you care?"
>
>
>>Even as Trump was demanding
>>that other "businessmen" bring their
>>jobs back from abroad HE was exporting
>>the jobs HE created.
>> Hypocrite much?
>
> Nope.
> Trump's business interests are being managed by corporate vice
> presidents who are responsible to Trump and the stockholders to make
> money.
>
> Why do the big corporations send jobs overseas?
> Can you figure that out yet?
Why does Trump keep HIS manufacturing jobs
overseas why he berates other companies for
doing the very same thing?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 14:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cqu35epensvl9s4men234m31f6qmi2nog4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2589217 |
Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: >Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in >>> Trump ties and suits are STILL >>>being made in Mexico. And China, and >>>Bangledesh. >> >> + Prove it. >> This is your claim. >> I don't believe it. > > > >Donald Trump: I Never Disputed That Some of My >October 19, 2015 >http://tinyurl.com/jkf92lv >Aug 24, 2015 >http://tinyurl.com/oos7nfo >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYoOPgeTMQc That was when Trump was a business man, not a candidate. >The 'Make >> America Great Again' hats, for instance, are made in Southern >> California. >> + Being a large scale businessman, I am pretty sure Trump does not go >> out to determine where each product with his name on it is now >> produced or made in America. He took advantage of all the laws that >> the liberals passed in the past pertaining to taxing corporations. Do >> you really care where an avacado was grown? >> I guess the question is: "Why do you care?" >> Trump's business interests are being managed by corporate vice >> presidents who are responsible to Trump and the stockholders to make >> money. >> >> Why do the big corporations send jobs overseas? >> Can you figure that out yet? > > > Why does Trump keep HIS manufacturing jobs >overseas why he berates other companies for >doing the very same thing? Why not? Trump is not managing his own companies - since he became president.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 20:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E7D2CD0B40Fnoemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2589252 |
Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
news:cqu35epensvl9s4men234m31f6qmi2nog4@4ax.com:
> Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote:
>
>>Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in
>
>>>> Trump ties and suits are STILL
>>>>being made in Mexico. And China, and
>>>>Bangledesh.
>>>
>>> + Prove it.
>>> This is your claim.
>>> I don't believe it.
>>
>>
>>
>>Donald Trump: I Never Disputed That Some of My
>>October 19, 2015
>>http://tinyurl.com/jkf92lv
>>Aug 24, 2015
>>http://tinyurl.com/oos7nfo
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYoOPgeTMQc
>
> That was when Trump was a business man, not a candidate.
>
Why didn't Trump the candidate move
his jobs back to American even as he was
pushing his "Hire Americans" speeches?
>>The 'Make
>>> America Great Again' hats, for instance, are made in Southern
>>> California.
>
>>> + Being a large scale businessman, I am pretty sure Trump does not go
>>> out to determine where each product with his name on it is now
>>> produced or made in America. He took advantage of all the laws that
>>> the liberals passed in the past pertaining to taxing corporations.
Do
>>> you really care where an avacado was grown?
>>> I guess the question is: "Why do you care?"
>
>>> Trump's business interests are being managed by corporate vice
>>> presidents who are responsible to Trump and the stockholders to make
>>> money.
>>>
>>> Why do the big corporations send jobs overseas?
>>> Can you figure that out yet?
>>
>>
>> Why does Trump keep HIS manufacturing jobs
>>overseas why he berates other companies for
>>doing the very same thing?
>
> Why not?
> Trump is not managing his own companies - since he became president.
>
You really think micro-manager and
control freak Trump isn't aware of where
HIS businesses (he still owns them all)
make their goodies?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 06:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <s5l55epgg98fpv5fp08irmm3h3q0hrq29u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2589672 |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 20:42:58 -0600, Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: >Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in >news:cqu35epensvl9s4men234m31f6qmi2nog4@4ax.com: > >> Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> wrote: >> >>>Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in >> >>>>> Trump ties and suits are STILL >>>>>being made in Mexico. And China, and >>>>>Bangledesh. >>>> >>>> + Prove it. >>>> This is your claim. >>>> I don't believe it. >>> >>> >>> >>>Donald Trump: I Never Disputed That Some of My >>>October 19, 2015 >>>http://tinyurl.com/jkf92lv >>>Aug 24, 2015 >>>http://tinyurl.com/oos7nfo >>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYoOPgeTMQc >> >> That was when Trump was a business man, not a candidate. >> > > > Why didn't Trump the candidate move >his jobs back to American even as he was >pushing his "Hire Americans" speeches? Several reasons. First of all, he gave up control of his business interests. Secondly, he had thousands of people who work for him who want to continue making money. Along with the shareholders. Trump does not "OWN" everything with his name on it. >> Trump is not managing his own companies - since he became president. >> > > You really think micro-manager and >control freak Trump isn't aware of where >HIS businesses (he still owns them all) >make their goodies? Trump has lost $ 200 M since he became president. He still gives his own salary to charity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gbbhpdF4tioU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2588304 |
Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 21:20:59 -0700, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 1/28/19 9:12 PM, Patrick wrote: >>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>> >>>> Trump's white supremacist propaganda, and its resulting violence, is one of >>>> the gravest dangers we face today. Who would ever have imagined that, in >>>> the 21st century, there could be so many gullible Americans eager to >>>> believe the most transparent lies? >>> >>> HEY! hillery lost. Get over it. >>> >> >> His comment has literally nothing to do with Clinton. Why are YOU >> obsessing over her? > > Well, for one thing... ted (along with millions of other liberals) > hate trump mainly because he beat hillery. By all means please show where Ted said this. Or are you reading his mind. Heck, show where MILLIONS of people said this. > Since trump is in charge, > these people will do or say anything that will make trump look bad. Trump is the one who controls his own actions and makes himself look bad. > They cannot see the unemployment rate is the lowest in decades, than > millions more are working, that taxes have been lowered, that Trump > confronted stupid treaties and deals that the last few presidents have > stupidly OK'd. Even the stock market almost doubled. How do you know what they see? > > Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises... and > since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they refuse to do > ANY negotiating. They want to show that Trump cannot fulfill his > promises. They want to show trump is weak. And pelosi and schumer > are the biggest jerk-offs in the country today. > Very emotional of you — but do you have reasoning to back anything you say?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 11:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ba463571d690b6e8c@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2588400 |
In article <gbbhpdF4tioU1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 21:20:59 -0700, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/28/19 9:12 PM, Patrick wrote: >>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Trump's white supremacist propaganda, and its resulting violence, is one of >>>>> the gravest dangers we face today. Who would ever have imagined that, in >>>>> the 21st century, there could be so many gullible Americans eager to >>>>> believe the most transparent lies? >>>> >>>> HEY! hillery lost. Get over it. >>>> >>> >>> His comment has literally nothing to do with Clinton. Why are YOU >>> obsessing over her? >> >> Well, for one thing... ted (along with millions of other liberals) >> hate trump mainly because he beat hillery. > >By all means please show where Ted said this. > >Or are you reading his mind. > >Heck, show where MILLIONS of people said this. > >> Since trump is in charge, >> these people will do or say anything that will make trump look bad. > >Trump is the one who controls his own actions and makes himself look bad. > >> They cannot see the unemployment rate is the lowest in decades, than >> millions more are working, that taxes have been lowered, that Trump >> confronted stupid treaties and deals that the last few presidents have >> stupidly OK'd. Even the stock market almost doubled. > >How do you know what they see? >> >> Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises... and >> since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they refuse to do >> ANY negotiating. They want to show that Trump cannot fulfill his >> promises. They want to show trump is weak. And pelosi and schumer >> are the biggest jerk-offs in the country today. >> > >Very emotional of you ? but do you have reasoning to back anything you say? He's rich and the president and you are not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 18:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gbbjq7F5as2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2588412 |
Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <gbbhpdF4tioU1@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 21:20:59 -0700, Snit >>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/28/19 9:12 PM, Patrick wrote: >>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Trump's white supremacist propaganda, and its resulting violence, is one of >>>>>> the gravest dangers we face today. Who would ever have imagined that, in >>>>>> the 21st century, there could be so many gullible Americans eager to >>>>>> believe the most transparent lies? >>>>> >>>>> HEY! hillery lost. Get over it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> His comment has literally nothing to do with Clinton. Why are YOU >>>> obsessing over her? >>> >>> Well, for one thing... ted (along with millions of other liberals) >>> hate trump mainly because he beat hillery. >> >> By all means please show where Ted said this. >> >> Or are you reading his mind. >> >> Heck, show where MILLIONS of people said this. >> >>> Since trump is in charge, >>> these people will do or say anything that will make trump look bad. >> >> Trump is the one who controls his own actions and makes himself look bad. >> >>> They cannot see the unemployment rate is the lowest in decades, than >>> millions more are working, that taxes have been lowered, that Trump >>> confronted stupid treaties and deals that the last few presidents have >>> stupidly OK'd. Even the stock market almost doubled. >> >> How do you know what they see? >>> >>> Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises... and >>> since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they refuse to do >>> ANY negotiating. They want to show that Trump cannot fulfill his >>> promises. They want to show trump is weak. And pelosi and schumer >>> are the biggest jerk-offs in the country today. >>> >> >> Very emotional of you ? but do you have reasoning to back anything you say? > > He's rich and the president and you are not. > And?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 12:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ba510d9a524c23e92@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2588413 |
In article <gbbjq7F5as2U1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> In article <gbbhpdF4tioU1@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 21:20:59 -0700, Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/28/19 9:12 PM, Patrick wrote: >>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Trump's white supremacist propaganda, and its resulting violence, is one of >>>>>>> the gravest dangers we face today. Who would ever have imagined that, in >>>>>>> the 21st century, there could be so many gullible Americans eager to >>>>>>> believe the most transparent lies? >>>>>> >>>>>> HEY! hillery lost. Get over it. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> His comment has literally nothing to do with Clinton. Why are YOU >>>>> obsessing over her? >>>> >>>> Well, for one thing... ted (along with millions of other liberals) >>>> hate trump mainly because he beat hillery. >>> >>> By all means please show where Ted said this. >>> >>> Or are you reading his mind. >>> >>> Heck, show where MILLIONS of people said this. >>> >>>> Since trump is in charge, >>>> these people will do or say anything that will make trump look bad. >>> >>> Trump is the one who controls his own actions and makes himself look bad. >>> >>>> They cannot see the unemployment rate is the lowest in decades, than >>>> millions more are working, that taxes have been lowered, that Trump >>>> confronted stupid treaties and deals that the last few presidents have >>>> stupidly OK'd. Even the stock market almost doubled. >>> >>> How do you know what they see? >>>> >>>> Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises... and >>>> since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they refuse to do >>>> ANY negotiating. They want to show that Trump cannot fulfill his >>>> promises. They want to show trump is weak. And pelosi and schumer >>>> are the biggest jerk-offs in the country today. >>>> >>> >>> Very emotional of you ? but do you have reasoning to back anything you say? >> >> He's rich and the president and you are not. >> > >And? and you're not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 11:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5H14E.250534$f65.138582@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #2588434 |
On 1/29/2019 11:01 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <gbbjq7F5as2U1@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> In article <gbbhpdF4tioU1@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> >>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 21:20:59 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/28/19 9:12 PM, Patrick wrote: >>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Trump's white supremacist propaganda, and its resulting violence, is one of >>>>>>>> the gravest dangers we face today. Who would ever have imagined that, in >>>>>>>> the 21st century, there could be so many gullible Americans eager to >>>>>>>> believe the most transparent lies? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> HEY! hillery lost. Get over it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> His comment has literally nothing to do with Clinton. Why are YOU >>>>>> obsessing over her? >>>>> >>>>> Well, for one thing... ted (along with millions of other liberals) >>>>> hate trump mainly because he beat hillery. >>>> >>>> By all means please show where Ted said this. >>>> >>>> Or are you reading his mind. >>>> >>>> Heck, show where MILLIONS of people said this. >>>> >>>>> Since trump is in charge, >>>>> these people will do or say anything that will make trump look bad. >>>> >>>> Trump is the one who controls his own actions and makes himself look bad. >>>> >>>>> They cannot see the unemployment rate is the lowest in decades, than >>>>> millions more are working, that taxes have been lowered, that Trump >>>>> confronted stupid treaties and deals that the last few presidents have >>>>> stupidly OK'd. Even the stock market almost doubled. >>>> >>>> How do you know what they see? >>>>> >>>>> Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises... and >>>>> since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they refuse to do >>>>> ANY negotiating. They want to show that Trump cannot fulfill his >>>>> promises. They want to show trump is weak. And pelosi and schumer >>>>> are the biggest jerk-offs in the country today. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Very emotional of you ? but do you have reasoning to back anything you say? >>> >>> He's rich and the president and you are not. >>> >> >> And? > > and you're not. Neither are you. However, what you do have in common with Trump is being a lying shitbag.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 12:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ba55954c52dc58e9c@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #2588439 |
In article <5H14E.250534$f65.138582@fx36.iad>, cap@philhendrie.con says... > >On 1/29/2019 11:01 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <gbbjq7F5as2U1@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> In article <gbbhpdF4tioU1@mid.individual.net>, >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>>> >>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 21:20:59 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/28/19 9:12 PM, Patrick wrote: >>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Trump's white supremacist propaganda, and its resulting violence, is one of >>>>>>>>> the gravest dangers we face today. Who would ever have imagined that, in >>>>>>>>> the 21st century, there could be so many gullible Americans eager to >>>>>>>>> believe the most transparent lies? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> HEY! hillery lost. Get over it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> His comment has literally nothing to do with Clinton. Why are YOU >>>>>>> obsessing over her? >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, for one thing... ted (along with millions of other liberals) >>>>>> hate trump mainly because he beat hillery. >>>>> >>>>> By all means please show where Ted said this. >>>>> >>>>> Or are you reading his mind. >>>>> >>>>> Heck, show where MILLIONS of people said this. >>>>> >>>>>> Since trump is in charge, >>>>>> these people will do or say anything that will make trump look bad. >>>>> >>>>> Trump is the one who controls his own actions and makes himself look bad. >>>>> >>>>>> They cannot see the unemployment rate is the lowest in decades, than >>>>>> millions more are working, that taxes have been lowered, that Trump >>>>>> confronted stupid treaties and deals that the last few presidents have >>>>>> stupidly OK'd. Even the stock market almost doubled. >>>>> >>>>> How do you know what they see? >>>>>> >>>>>> Trump has really tried to fulfill all of his campaign promises... and >>>>>> since the wall is the latest one he is working on, they refuse to do >>>>>> ANY negotiating. They want to show that Trump cannot fulfill his >>>>>> promises. They want to show trump is weak. And pelosi and schumer >>>>>> are the biggest jerk-offs in the country today. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Very emotional of you ? but do you have reasoning to back anything you say? >>>> >>>> He's rich and the president and you are not. >>>> >>> >>> And? >> >> and you're not. > >Neither are you. However, what you do have in common with Trump is being a >lying shitbag. Tell me what I have lied about and prove I am not rich. Liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 26 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web