Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2570886 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jim Hoft <JimHoftton5@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-27 22:47 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-04 23:05 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 971 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Jim Hoft <JimHoftton5@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-27 22:47 +0000
Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 17:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-27 17:46 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 18:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-27 19:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 20:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-27 19:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 21:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-27 20:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-28 06:18 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 02:54 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 03:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 18:57 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 00:52 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 17:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:45 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 15:43 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:16 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-29 12:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 12:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 03:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Malte Runz <malterunz@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 02:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-28 22:18 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 15:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-28 18:27 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 00:52 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:46 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:08 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 20:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 23:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:49 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 16:08 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 23:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 16:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:24 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 19:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:09 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:43 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 20:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:47 -0800
Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:28 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:46 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:47 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 16:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:22 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 14:36 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:41 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 00:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 10:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 11:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:36 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 12:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-04 07:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 09:07 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:12 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Delvin Benêt <DB@cnbc.nyc> - 2019-01-04 07:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 12:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:27 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:03 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 09:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 15:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 14:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 17:05 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 13:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 16:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 14:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-04 05:49 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:50 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 14:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 16:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 15:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:25 -0800
Snit Complains To TPG Troll Board About Being Trolled- Board Takes It Under Advisement Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:31 -0800
Re: Snit Complains To TPG Troll Board About Being Trolled- Board Takes It Under Advisement Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-04 00:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 17:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 18:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 20:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 01:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:01 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:18 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-07 23:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 06:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 23:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 02:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:58 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 12:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 19:41 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 12:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 13:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 13:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 14:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 22:27 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 15:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 15:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 15:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 16:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 16:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 00:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 17:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 17:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 15:42 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 16:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 00:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 18:52 -0800
Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:06 -0800
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 13:16 -0700
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:18 -0700
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:23 -0800
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:22 -0800
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist who sounds a lot like neal warren AKA greg hall taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post on usenet as "Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:23 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:35 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 14:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 04:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 11:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 02:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:59 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 12:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 19:41 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:18 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 11:44 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 04:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:46 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 17:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 17:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:49 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 21:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-04 08:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 01:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:54 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:02 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 17:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 17:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 01:11 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 16:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 18:59 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:12 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 10:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 10:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:16 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 11:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 13:40 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 12:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 13:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 12:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:48 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:34 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:20 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:35 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:14 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:04 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 08:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 18:03 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 12:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 11:59 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 09:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 11:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:58 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:46 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:37 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:59 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 23:47 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:34 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 08:59 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 10:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 23:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 18:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:08 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 22:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 19:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:03 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 14:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 14:40 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:20 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:43 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:12 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:16 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 00:56 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 21:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 08:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 23:42 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 07:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 13:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:19 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 20:04 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "malkinmichelle6@gmail.com" <malkinmichelle6@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 18:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 13:06 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 09:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:04 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:06 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 20:14 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:03 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 08:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:07 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:31 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:09 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 20:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-31 00:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:10 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 09:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:11 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 20:56 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 08:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 19:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:42 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:44 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 21:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 15:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:37 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:39 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 15:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:43 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:31 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 22:44 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:02 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 20:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 12:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:31 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 15:46 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:46 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:32 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:36 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:41 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:55 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:59 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:21 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:37 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:42 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:07 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:19 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:25 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:30 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:38 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:14 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:39 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:06 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 20:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:51 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 21:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 22:15 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 21:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 22:56 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 22:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 23:14 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 22:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 00:17 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 07:53 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:16 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-28 21:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 11:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:08 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-28 23:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:04 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:49 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:13 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:35 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:46 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:23 -0800
Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:16 -0700
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:17 -0700
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:41 -0800
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:47 +0000
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:40 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:43 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:19 -0700
Re: Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:16 -0700
Re: Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-31 06:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 07:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 06:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-31 08:07 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 17:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 09:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 17:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 09:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 18:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 12:12 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-31 09:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 18:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 10:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 12:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 02:00 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 20:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 13:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 12:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-31 12:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:58 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 19:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:22 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:15 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:44 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 02:03 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:12 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:47 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:56 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:58 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:03 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:59 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 01:01 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:14 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 22:03 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Delvin Benêt <DB@cnbc.nyc> - 2019-01-04 20:30 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:29 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 07:57 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership John Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 10:47 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 12:33 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 13:49 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 13:59 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 15:40 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 13:39 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 14:14 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2019-01-05 11:10 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 03:43 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:31 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 12:00 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:01 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:58 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:01 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:30 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:08 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:21 -0800
Snit's OK With Bans- Especially if They Don't Come Out And Say It. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 00:52 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:04 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "malkinmichelle6@gmail.com" <malkinmichelle6@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 18:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vtandofsky@gmail.com - 2018-12-28 22:04 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 18:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "malkinmichelle6@gmail.com" <malkinmichelle6@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 18:19 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-28 18:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-28 23:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 07:47 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 08:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 23:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:15 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 13:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 14:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 17:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 18:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 21:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 06:23 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 23:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 18:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 11:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-01 13:06 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-01 14:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 17:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-01 21:25 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-02 05:19 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 14:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 00:18 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:15 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 11:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 22:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:03 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 18:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 20:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:25 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 09:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:13 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 11:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-29 00:45 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:18 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 08:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 08:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 14:49 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vtandofsky@gmail.com - 2018-12-28 16:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "malkinmichelle6@gmail.com" <malkinmichelle6@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 18:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vtandofsky@gmail.com - 2018-12-28 22:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:13 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "malkinmichelle6@gmail.com" <malkinmichelle6@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 17:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:08 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Max Planck <Melchizedek_KingofSalem@aol.com> - 2019-01-04 23:05 -0800
Page 36 of 49 — ← Prev page 1 … 34 35 [36] 37 38 … 49 Next page →
| From | "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 21:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q09fbn$6hi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2571940 |
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message news:g8qtecFco00U1@mid.individual.net... > On 12/29/18 8:06 PM, DoD wrote: > ... >>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>> >>>> >>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>> >>> You said, in response to the idea of not being quiet: >> >> idea of being quiet.... which you weren't, so you failed. Which you >> did... You failed to be >> quiet. >> >> >> > > You set a standard which you failed to achieve. That is a failure on YOUR > part. No... I set a standard for YOU, for which YOU failed to achieve.. That is a failure on YOUR part.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 21:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8qufjFcttoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2571941 |
On 12/29/18 8:51 PM, DoD wrote: > > > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message > news:g8qtecFco00U1@mid.individual.net... >> On 12/29/18 8:06 PM, DoD wrote: >> ... >>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>> >>>> You said, in response to the idea of not being quiet: >>> >>> idea of being quiet.... which you weren't, so you failed. Which you >>> did... You failed to be >>> quiet. >>> >>> >>> >> >> You set a standard which you failed to achieve. That is a failure on >> YOUR part. > > No... I set a standard for YOU, for which YOU failed to achieve.. That > is a failure on YOUR > part. Just as I speak for me and you speak for you, you set standards for yourself and I set standards for myself. Now in my case I hold myself to higher standards than I hold others. You show here you want to try to hold me to standards you cannot reach. Interesting how you demonstrate how you feel I am more capable than you. But, regardless, I am not obligated to live to any arbitrary standard you set. It is not a failure on my part... it is a failure on your part to try to control others and to set standards for others you do not live to. You failed on multiple levels. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 22:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q09gpv$l1d$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2571945 |
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message news:g8qufjFcttoU1@mid.individual.net... > On 12/29/18 8:51 PM, DoD wrote: >> >> >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >> news:g8qtecFco00U1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 12/29/18 8:06 PM, DoD wrote: >>> ... >>>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>>> >>>>> You said, in response to the idea of not being quiet: >>>> >>>> idea of being quiet.... which you weren't, so you failed. Which you >>>> did... You failed to be >>>> quiet. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> You set a standard which you failed to achieve. That is a failure on >>> YOUR part. >> >> No... I set a standard for YOU, for which YOU failed to achieve.. That is >> a failure on YOUR >> part. > > Just as I speak for me and you speak for you, you set standards for > yourself and I set standards for myself. > > Now in my case I hold myself to higher standards than I hold others. You > show here you want to try to hold me to standards you cannot reach. > > Interesting how you demonstrate how you feel I am more capable than you. > But, regardless, I am not obligated to live to any arbitrary standard you > set. It is not a failure on my part... it is a failure on your part to try > to control others and to set standards for others you do not live to. > > You failed on multiple levels. That's nice, but it was a request. I wasn't expecting you to live by it precisely because I felt you were not up to the standard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 21:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8qvomFd542U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2571953 |
On 12/29/18 9:15 PM, DoD wrote: > > > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message > news:g8qufjFcttoU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 12/29/18 8:51 PM, DoD wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>> news:g8qtecFco00U1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 12/29/18 8:06 PM, DoD wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>>>> >>>>>> You said, in response to the idea of not being quiet: >>>>> >>>>> idea of being quiet.... which you weren't, so you failed. Which you >>>>> did... You failed to be >>>>> quiet. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> You set a standard which you failed to achieve. That is a failure on >>>> YOUR part. >>> >>> No... I set a standard for YOU, for which YOU failed to achieve.. >>> That is a failure on YOUR >>> part. >> >> Just as I speak for me and you speak for you, you set standards for >> yourself and I set standards for myself. >> >> Now in my case I hold myself to higher standards than I hold others. >> You show here you want to try to hold me to standards you cannot reach. >> >> Interesting how you demonstrate how you feel I am more capable than >> you. But, regardless, I am not obligated to live to any arbitrary >> standard you set. It is not a failure on my part... it is a failure on >> your part to try to control others and to set standards for others you >> do not live to. >> >> You failed on multiple levels. > > That's nice, but it was a request. I wasn't expecting you to live by it > precisely because I felt > you were not up to the standard. Interesting how you fail to face your failures but instead try to retcon what you said was a "standard" into a "request". Heck, by the end of your sentence you even revert to the word "standard". Nope. You failed to meet your own standard and did not even think to try to hold yourself to it as you wanted to hold others. As far as a request, if do not wish to speak to me then do not. Heck, you can even kill filter me. Makes no difference to me. But you will not... you are now invested in trying to convince me your failures are somehow my fault, or perhaps that they are even mine. You are showing signs of cognitive dissonance and frustration, and that frustration will keep you posting in this way. Very predictable. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 22:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q09j5s$u6f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2571956 |
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message news:g8qvomFd542U1@mid.individual.net... > On 12/29/18 9:15 PM, DoD wrote: >> >> >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >> news:g8qufjFcttoU1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 12/29/18 8:51 PM, DoD wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>> news:g8qtecFco00U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 12/29/18 8:06 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You said, in response to the idea of not being quiet: >>>>>> >>>>>> idea of being quiet.... which you weren't, so you failed. Which you >>>>>> did... You failed to be >>>>>> quiet. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You set a standard which you failed to achieve. That is a failure on >>>>> YOUR part. >>>> >>>> No... I set a standard for YOU, for which YOU failed to achieve.. That >>>> is a failure on YOUR >>>> part. >>> >>> Just as I speak for me and you speak for you, you set standards for >>> yourself and I set standards for myself. >>> >>> Now in my case I hold myself to higher standards than I hold others. You >>> show here you want to try to hold me to standards you cannot reach. >>> >>> Interesting how you demonstrate how you feel I am more capable than you. >>> But, regardless, I am not obligated to live to any arbitrary standard >>> you set. It is not a failure on my part... it is a failure on your part >>> to try to control others and to set standards for others you do not live >>> to. >>> >>> You failed on multiple levels. >> >> That's nice, but it was a request. I wasn't expecting you to live by it >> precisely because I felt >> you were not up to the standard. > > Interesting how you fail to face your failures but instead try to retcon > what you said was a "standard" into a "request". Heck, by the end of your > sentence you even revert to the word "standard". Everything has a standard... Even a request.. I requested you to be quiet.. The obvious standard is to be quiet. I could have stipulated it to be quiet for 5 minutes.. Then 5 minutes of quiet would have been the standard. This should not be hard for you to understand. > Nope. You failed to meet your own standard and did not even think to try > to hold yourself to it as you wanted to hold others. I didn't say to myself, self, would you be quiet. Had I would have done that, I would have failed to meet that standard, and then **I** would have failed. Again, this is not that hard. But I do find it interesting, that right after I made that request, you said that I failed, yet you still can't articulate just what you meant by that. > As far as a request, if do not wish to speak to me then do not. Heck, you > can even kill filter me. Makes no difference to me. IF I didn't want to speak to you then I wouldn't. There are plenty on these forums which I haven't spoken to in years. >But you will not... you are now invested in trying to convince me your >failures are somehow my fault, or perhaps that they are even mine. I am not invested in anything with you. You are the one who is invested in these groups, a lot more than I am. >You are showing signs of cognitive dissonance and frustration, and that >frustration will keep you posting in this way. > > Very predictable. What is predictable is that the next time someone will bring up a gun argument that I see in a cross post, it is FAR more likely you will chime into spreading your opinion, than I will chime in and spread my opinion. You are invested far more than I. See, I realize the futility of those arguments. You want to get peoples guns so you can control people and make them bend to your left wing will. I know that you will never accomplish that, so most if not all of these discussions are really just people banging out their frustrations on their keyboards... I find it most humorous indeed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 22:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8r23mFdl45U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2571970 |
On 12/29/18 9:56 PM, DoD wrote: > > > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message > news:g8qvomFd542U1@mid.individual.net... >> On 12/29/18 9:15 PM, DoD wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>> news:g8qufjFcttoU1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 12/29/18 8:51 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:g8qtecFco00U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 12/29/18 8:06 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You said, in response to the idea of not being quiet: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> idea of being quiet.... which you weren't, so you failed. Which >>>>>>> you did... You failed to be >>>>>>> quiet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You set a standard which you failed to achieve. That is a failure >>>>>> on YOUR part. >>>>> >>>>> No... I set a standard for YOU, for which YOU failed to achieve.. >>>>> That is a failure on YOUR >>>>> part. >>>> >>>> Just as I speak for me and you speak for you, you set standards for >>>> yourself and I set standards for myself. >>>> >>>> Now in my case I hold myself to higher standards than I hold others. >>>> You show here you want to try to hold me to standards you cannot reach. >>>> >>>> Interesting how you demonstrate how you feel I am more capable than >>>> you. But, regardless, I am not obligated to live to any arbitrary >>>> standard you set. It is not a failure on my part... it is a failure >>>> on your part to try to control others and to set standards for >>>> others you do not live to. >>>> >>>> You failed on multiple levels. >>> >>> That's nice, but it was a request. I wasn't expecting you to live by >>> it precisely because I felt >>> you were not up to the standard. >> >> Interesting how you fail to face your failures but instead try to >> retcon what you said was a "standard" into a "request". Heck, by the >> end of your sentence you even revert to the word "standard". > > Everything has a standard... Even a request.. I requested you to be > quiet.. The obvious > standard is to be quiet. I could have stipulated it to be quiet for 5 > minutes.. Then 5 minutes > of quiet would have been the standard. This should not be hard for you > to understand. > >> Nope. You failed to meet your own standard and did not even think to >> try to hold yourself to it as you wanted to hold others. > > I didn't say to myself, self, would you be quiet. Had I would have done > that, I would have failed > to meet that standard, and then **I** would have failed. Again, this is > not that hard. But I do find it > interesting, that right after I made that request, you said that I > failed, yet you still can't articulate just > what you meant by that. > >> As far as a request, if do not wish to speak to me then do not. Heck, >> you can even kill filter me. Makes no difference to me. > > IF I didn't want to speak to you then I wouldn't. There are plenty on > these forums which I haven't > spoken to in years. > >> But you will not... you are now invested in trying to convince me your >> failures are somehow my fault, or perhaps that they are even mine. > > I am not invested in anything with you. You are the one who is invested > in these groups, a lot more > than I am. > >> You are showing signs of cognitive dissonance and frustration, and >> that frustration will keep you posting in this way. >> >> Very predictable. You failed to meet your own standard. You failed. You failed in an effort to use logic. You failed. You failed to get me to accept your failed logic. You failed. You failed to control me. You failed. You failed to show I have some "investment" you do not. You failed. > What is predictable is that the next time someone will bring up a gun > argument that I see in a cross post, it is FAR more likely you will > chime into spreading your opinion, than I will chime in and spread my > opinion. I can back my opinions better than you can yours. You want me to back off because of this... and even you know you are likely to fail. > You are invested far more than I. > > See, I realize the futility of those arguments. You want to get peoples > guns so you can control people and make them > bend to your left wing will. You failed to understand my views. You failed. > I know that you will never accomplish that, > so most if not all of these discussions are > really just people banging out their frustrations on their keyboards... > I find it most humorous indeed. After all of your failures it is not surprising to see you speak of frustrations. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 23:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q09k6v$g7f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2571972 |
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message news:g8r23mFdl45U1@mid.individual.net... > On 12/29/18 9:56 PM, DoD wrote: >> >> >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >> news:g8qvomFd542U1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 12/29/18 9:15 PM, DoD wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>> news:g8qufjFcttoU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 12/29/18 8:51 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:g8qtecFco00U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On 12/29/18 8:06 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You said, in response to the idea of not being quiet: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> idea of being quiet.... which you weren't, so you failed. Which you >>>>>>>> did... You failed to be >>>>>>>> quiet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You set a standard which you failed to achieve. That is a failure on >>>>>>> YOUR part. >>>>>> >>>>>> No... I set a standard for YOU, for which YOU failed to achieve.. >>>>>> That is a failure on YOUR >>>>>> part. >>>>> >>>>> Just as I speak for me and you speak for you, you set standards for >>>>> yourself and I set standards for myself. >>>>> >>>>> Now in my case I hold myself to higher standards than I hold others. >>>>> You show here you want to try to hold me to standards you cannot >>>>> reach. >>>>> >>>>> Interesting how you demonstrate how you feel I am more capable than >>>>> you. But, regardless, I am not obligated to live to any arbitrary >>>>> standard you set. It is not a failure on my part... it is a failure on >>>>> your part to try to control others and to set standards for others you >>>>> do not live to. >>>>> >>>>> You failed on multiple levels. >>>> >>>> That's nice, but it was a request. I wasn't expecting you to live by it >>>> precisely because I felt >>>> you were not up to the standard. >>> >>> Interesting how you fail to face your failures but instead try to retcon >>> what you said was a "standard" into a "request". Heck, by the end of >>> your sentence you even revert to the word "standard". >> >> Everything has a standard... Even a request.. I requested you to be >> quiet.. The obvious >> standard is to be quiet. I could have stipulated it to be quiet for 5 >> minutes.. Then 5 minutes >> of quiet would have been the standard. This should not be hard for you to >> understand. >> >>> Nope. You failed to meet your own standard and did not even think to try >>> to hold yourself to it as you wanted to hold others. >> >> I didn't say to myself, self, would you be quiet. Had I would have done >> that, I would have failed >> to meet that standard, and then **I** would have failed. Again, this is >> not that hard. But I do find it >> interesting, that right after I made that request, you said that I >> failed, yet you still can't articulate just >> what you meant by that. >> >>> As far as a request, if do not wish to speak to me then do not. Heck, >>> you can even kill filter me. Makes no difference to me. >> >> IF I didn't want to speak to you then I wouldn't. There are plenty on >> these forums which I haven't >> spoken to in years. >> >>> But you will not... you are now invested in trying to convince me your >>> failures are somehow my fault, or perhaps that they are even mine. >> >> I am not invested in anything with you. You are the one who is invested >> in these groups, a lot more >> than I am. >> >>> You are showing signs of cognitive dissonance and frustration, and that >>> frustration will keep you posting in this way. >>> >>> Very predictable. > > You failed to meet your own standard. You failed. Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. > You failed in an effort to use logic. You failed. Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. > You failed to get me to accept your failed logic. You failed. Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. > You failed to control me. You failed. Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. > You failed to show I have some "investment" you do not. You failed. Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. BTW, the one directly above can be seen by you being in a heck of a lot more gun conversations than I am in. >> What is predictable is that the next time someone will bring up a gun >> argument that I see in a cross post, it is FAR more likely you will >> chime into spreading your opinion, than I will chime in and spread my >> opinion. > > I can back my opinions better than you can yours. You want me to back off > because of this... and even you know you are likely to fail. > >> You are invested far more than I. >> >> See, I realize the futility of those arguments. You want to get peoples >> guns so you can control people and make them >> bend to your left wing will. > > You failed to understand my views. You failed. Are you saying you don't want to take peoples guns? >> I know that you will never accomplish that, so most if not all of these >> discussions are >> really just people banging out their frustrations on their keyboards... >> I find it most humorous indeed. > > After all of your failures it is not surprising to see you speak of > frustrations. LOL... I ate your lunch...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 22:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8r2qjFdpjuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2571973 |
On 12/29/18 10:14 PM, DoD wrote: > > > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message > news:g8r23mFdl45U1@mid.individual.net... >> On 12/29/18 9:56 PM, DoD wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>> news:g8qvomFd542U1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 12/29/18 9:15 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:g8qufjFcttoU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 12/29/18 8:51 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:g8qtecFco00U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 8:06 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You said, in response to the idea of not being quiet: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> idea of being quiet.... which you weren't, so you failed. Which >>>>>>>>> you did... You failed to be >>>>>>>>> quiet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You set a standard which you failed to achieve. That is a >>>>>>>> failure on YOUR part. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No... I set a standard for YOU, for which YOU failed to achieve.. >>>>>>> That is a failure on YOUR >>>>>>> part. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just as I speak for me and you speak for you, you set standards >>>>>> for yourself and I set standards for myself. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now in my case I hold myself to higher standards than I hold >>>>>> others. You show here you want to try to hold me to standards you >>>>>> cannot reach. >>>>>> >>>>>> Interesting how you demonstrate how you feel I am more capable >>>>>> than you. But, regardless, I am not obligated to live to any >>>>>> arbitrary standard you set. It is not a failure on my part... it >>>>>> is a failure on your part to try to control others and to set >>>>>> standards for others you do not live to. >>>>>> >>>>>> You failed on multiple levels. >>>>> >>>>> That's nice, but it was a request. I wasn't expecting you to live >>>>> by it precisely because I felt >>>>> you were not up to the standard. >>>> >>>> Interesting how you fail to face your failures but instead try to >>>> retcon what you said was a "standard" into a "request". Heck, by the >>>> end of your sentence you even revert to the word "standard". >>> >>> Everything has a standard... Even a request.. I requested you to be >>> quiet.. The obvious >>> standard is to be quiet. I could have stipulated it to be quiet for 5 >>> minutes.. Then 5 minutes >>> of quiet would have been the standard. This should not be hard for >>> you to understand. >>> >>>> Nope. You failed to meet your own standard and did not even think to >>>> try to hold yourself to it as you wanted to hold others. >>> >>> I didn't say to myself, self, would you be quiet. Had I would have >>> done that, I would have failed >>> to meet that standard, and then **I** would have failed. Again, this >>> is not that hard. But I do find it >>> interesting, that right after I made that request, you said that I >>> failed, yet you still can't articulate just >>> what you meant by that. >>> >>>> As far as a request, if do not wish to speak to me then do not. >>>> Heck, you can even kill filter me. Makes no difference to me. >>> >>> IF I didn't want to speak to you then I wouldn't. There are plenty on >>> these forums which I haven't >>> spoken to in years. >>> >>>> But you will not... you are now invested in trying to convince me >>>> your failures are somehow my fault, or perhaps that they are even mine. >>> >>> I am not invested in anything with you. You are the one who is >>> invested in these groups, a lot more >>> than I am. >>> >>>> You are showing signs of cognitive dissonance and frustration, and >>>> that frustration will keep you posting in this way. >>>> >>>> Very predictable. >> >> You failed to meet your own standard. You failed. > > Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. > >> You failed in an effort to use logic. You failed. > > Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. > >> You failed to get me to accept your failed logic. You failed. > > Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. > >> You failed to control me. You failed. > > Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. > >> You failed to show I have some "investment" you do not. You failed. > > Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. BTW, the one directly > above can be seen by you being in > a heck of a lot more gun conversations than I am in. > > >> What is predictable is that the next time someone will bring up a gun >>> argument that I see in a cross post, it is FAR more likely you will >>> chime into spreading your opinion, than I will chime in and spread my >>> opinion. >> >> I can back my opinions better than you can yours. You want me to back >> off because of this... and even you know you are likely to fail. >> >>> You are invested far more than I. >>> >>> See, I realize the futility of those arguments. You want to get >>> peoples guns so you can control people and make them >>> bend to your left wing will. >> >> You failed to understand my views. You failed. > > Are you saying you don't want to take peoples guns? I have never said, suggested, hinted, or implied I wish to take people's guns. Nor did I say I want people to bend to any "left wing will", OTHER than I want them to back equal rights (which is clearly a left wing value, as opposed to the right wing "value" of special entitlements). I have noted your utter failures... and look above where you freak out over it. You failed time and time again. But so what? This is a Usenet discussion. Move on. Try harder next time. Work to improve yourself. Stop beating yourself up over your failures in a meaningless side issue bit of nonsense where you tried to control someone you see as better than yourself. >>> I know that you will never accomplish that, so most if not all of >>> these discussions are >>> really just people banging out their frustrations on their >>> keyboards... I find it most humorous indeed. >> >> After all of your failures it is not surprising to see you speak of >> frustrations. > > LOL... I ate your lunch... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 00:17 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q09ntd$h2u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2571974 |
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message news:g8r2qjFdpjuU1@mid.individual.net... > On 12/29/18 10:14 PM, DoD wrote: >> >> >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >> news:g8r23mFdl45U1@mid.individual.net... >>> On 12/29/18 9:56 PM, DoD wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>> news:g8qvomFd542U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 12/29/18 9:15 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:g8qufjFcttoU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On 12/29/18 8:51 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:g8qtecFco00U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 8:06 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You said, in response to the idea of not being quiet: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> idea of being quiet.... which you weren't, so you failed. Which >>>>>>>>>> you did... You failed to be >>>>>>>>>> quiet. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You set a standard which you failed to achieve. That is a failure >>>>>>>>> on YOUR part. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No... I set a standard for YOU, for which YOU failed to achieve.. >>>>>>>> That is a failure on YOUR >>>>>>>> part. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just as I speak for me and you speak for you, you set standards for >>>>>>> yourself and I set standards for myself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now in my case I hold myself to higher standards than I hold others. >>>>>>> You show here you want to try to hold me to standards you cannot >>>>>>> reach. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Interesting how you demonstrate how you feel I am more capable than >>>>>>> you. But, regardless, I am not obligated to live to any arbitrary >>>>>>> standard you set. It is not a failure on my part... it is a failure >>>>>>> on your part to try to control others and to set standards for >>>>>>> others you do not live to. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You failed on multiple levels. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's nice, but it was a request. I wasn't expecting you to live by >>>>>> it precisely because I felt >>>>>> you were not up to the standard. >>>>> >>>>> Interesting how you fail to face your failures but instead try to >>>>> retcon what you said was a "standard" into a "request". Heck, by the >>>>> end of your sentence you even revert to the word "standard". >>>> >>>> Everything has a standard... Even a request.. I requested you to be >>>> quiet.. The obvious >>>> standard is to be quiet. I could have stipulated it to be quiet for 5 >>>> minutes.. Then 5 minutes >>>> of quiet would have been the standard. This should not be hard for you >>>> to understand. >>>> >>>>> Nope. You failed to meet your own standard and did not even think to >>>>> try to hold yourself to it as you wanted to hold others. >>>> >>>> I didn't say to myself, self, would you be quiet. Had I would have done >>>> that, I would have failed >>>> to meet that standard, and then **I** would have failed. Again, this is >>>> not that hard. But I do find it >>>> interesting, that right after I made that request, you said that I >>>> failed, yet you still can't articulate just >>>> what you meant by that. >>>> >>>>> As far as a request, if do not wish to speak to me then do not. Heck, >>>>> you can even kill filter me. Makes no difference to me. >>>> >>>> IF I didn't want to speak to you then I wouldn't. There are plenty on >>>> these forums which I haven't >>>> spoken to in years. >>>> >>>>> But you will not... you are now invested in trying to convince me your >>>>> failures are somehow my fault, or perhaps that they are even mine. >>>> >>>> I am not invested in anything with you. You are the one who is invested >>>> in these groups, a lot more >>>> than I am. >>>> >>>>> You are showing signs of cognitive dissonance and frustration, and >>>>> that frustration will keep you posting in this way. >>>>> >>>>> Very predictable. >>> >>> You failed to meet your own standard. You failed. >> >> Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. >> >>> You failed in an effort to use logic. You failed. >> >> Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. >> >>> You failed to get me to accept your failed logic. You failed. >> >> Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. >> >>> You failed to control me. You failed. >> >> Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. >> >>> You failed to show I have some "investment" you do not. You failed. >> >> Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. BTW, the one directly >> above can be seen by you being in >> a heck of a lot more gun conversations than I am in. >> >> >> What is predictable is that the next time someone will bring up a gun >>>> argument that I see in a cross post, it is FAR more likely you will >>>> chime into spreading your opinion, than I will chime in and spread my >>>> opinion. >>> >>> I can back my opinions better than you can yours. You want me to back >>> off because of this... and even you know you are likely to fail. >>> >>>> You are invested far more than I. >>>> >>>> See, I realize the futility of those arguments. You want to get peoples >>>> guns so you can control people and make them >>>> bend to your left wing will. >>> >>> You failed to understand my views. You failed. >> >> Are you saying you don't want to take peoples guns? > > I have never said, suggested, hinted, or implied I wish to take people's > guns. you have said.... "Quote the sentence about the right to bear arms that defines it WITHOUT mentioning a well regulated militia." You wouldn't bring that up without having an intention.. that intention is to take away peoples guns... > Nor did I say I want people to bend to any "left wing will", OTHER than I > want them to back equal rights (which is clearly a left wing value, as > opposed to the right wing "value" of special entitlements). Clearly the left wing wants special rights for their various classes of people and even then it gets befuddled when one class clashes with others. The right wants equal rights across the board. > I have noted your utter failures... Ummm no, you have given one liners without any substantive rebuttals. > and look above where you freak out over it. Another claim without substance. >You failed time and time again. But so what? This is a Usenet discussion. >Move on. Try harder next time. Work to improve yourself. Stop beating >yourself up over your failures in a meaningless side issue bit of nonsense >where you tried to control someone you see as better than yourself. LOL... I ate your lunch again. >>>> I know that you will never accomplish that, so most if not all of these >>>> discussions are >>>> really just people banging out their frustrations on their keyboards... >>>> I find it most humorous indeed. >>> >>> After all of your failures it is not surprising to see you speak of >>> frustrations. >> >> LOL... I ate your lunch... > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 07:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8rbrqFfjplU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2571989 |
DoD <danskisanjar@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message > news:g8r2qjFdpjuU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 12/29/18 10:14 PM, DoD wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>> news:g8r23mFdl45U1@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 12/29/18 9:56 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:g8qvomFd542U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 12/29/18 9:15 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:g8qufjFcttoU1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 8:51 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:g8qtecFco00U1@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 8:06 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You said, in response to the idea of not being quiet: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> idea of being quiet.... which you weren't, so you failed. Which >>>>>>>>>>> you did... You failed to be >>>>>>>>>>> quiet. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You set a standard which you failed to achieve. That is a failure >>>>>>>>>> on YOUR part. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No... I set a standard for YOU, for which YOU failed to achieve.. >>>>>>>>> That is a failure on YOUR >>>>>>>>> part. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just as I speak for me and you speak for you, you set standards for >>>>>>>> yourself and I set standards for myself. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now in my case I hold myself to higher standards than I hold others. >>>>>>>> You show here you want to try to hold me to standards you cannot >>>>>>>> reach. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Interesting how you demonstrate how you feel I am more capable than >>>>>>>> you. But, regardless, I am not obligated to live to any arbitrary >>>>>>>> standard you set. It is not a failure on my part... it is a failure >>>>>>>> on your part to try to control others and to set standards for >>>>>>>> others you do not live to. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You failed on multiple levels. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's nice, but it was a request. I wasn't expecting you to live by >>>>>>> it precisely because I felt >>>>>>> you were not up to the standard. >>>>>> >>>>>> Interesting how you fail to face your failures but instead try to >>>>>> retcon what you said was a "standard" into a "request". Heck, by the >>>>>> end of your sentence you even revert to the word "standard". >>>>> >>>>> Everything has a standard... Even a request.. I requested you to be >>>>> quiet.. The obvious >>>>> standard is to be quiet. I could have stipulated it to be quiet for 5 >>>>> minutes.. Then 5 minutes >>>>> of quiet would have been the standard. This should not be hard for you >>>>> to understand. >>>>> >>>>>> Nope. You failed to meet your own standard and did not even think to >>>>>> try to hold yourself to it as you wanted to hold others. >>>>> >>>>> I didn't say to myself, self, would you be quiet. Had I would have done >>>>> that, I would have failed >>>>> to meet that standard, and then **I** would have failed. Again, this is >>>>> not that hard. But I do find it >>>>> interesting, that right after I made that request, you said that I >>>>> failed, yet you still can't articulate just >>>>> what you meant by that. >>>>> >>>>>> As far as a request, if do not wish to speak to me then do not. Heck, >>>>>> you can even kill filter me. Makes no difference to me. >>>>> >>>>> IF I didn't want to speak to you then I wouldn't. There are plenty on >>>>> these forums which I haven't >>>>> spoken to in years. >>>>> >>>>>> But you will not... you are now invested in trying to convince me your >>>>>> failures are somehow my fault, or perhaps that they are even mine. >>>>> >>>>> I am not invested in anything with you. You are the one who is invested >>>>> in these groups, a lot more >>>>> than I am. >>>>> >>>>>> You are showing signs of cognitive dissonance and frustration, and >>>>>> that frustration will keep you posting in this way. >>>>>> >>>>>> Very predictable. >>>> >>>> You failed to meet your own standard. You failed. >>> >>> Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. >>> >>>> You failed in an effort to use logic. You failed. >>> >>> Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. >>> >>>> You failed to get me to accept your failed logic. You failed. >>> >>> Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. >>> >>>> You failed to control me. You failed. >>> >>> Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. >>> >>>> You failed to show I have some "investment" you do not. You failed. >>> >>> Not a cohesive, substantive rebuttal. You failed. BTW, the one directly >>> above can be seen by you being in >>> a heck of a lot more gun conversations than I am in. >>> >>>>> What is predictable is that the next time someone will bring up a gun >>>>> argument that I see in a cross post, it is FAR more likely you will >>>>> chime into spreading your opinion, than I will chime in and spread my >>>>> opinion. >>>> >>>> I can back my opinions better than you can yours. You want me to back >>>> off because of this... and even you know you are likely to fail. >>>> >>>>> You are invested far more than I. >>>>> >>>>> See, I realize the futility of those arguments. You want to get peoples >>>>> guns so you can control people and make them >>>>> bend to your left wing will. >>>> >>>> You failed to understand my views. You failed. >>> >>> Are you saying you don't want to take peoples guns? >> >> I have never said, suggested, hinted, or implied I wish to take people's >> guns. > > you have said.... > > "Quote the sentence about the right to bear arms that defines it WITHOUT > mentioning a well regulated militia." And you failed. OK. You are not obligated to even try to understand the Constitution. > You wouldn't bring that up without having an intention.. that intention is > to take away peoples > guns... The only reason you can think of that people would learn about the Constitution is so they can take others guns. That is weird. Do you see now how you failed to comprehend? >> Nor did I say I want people to bend to any "left wing will", OTHER than I >> want them to back equal rights (which is clearly a left wing value, as >> opposed to the right wing "value" of special entitlements). > > Clearly the left wing wants special rights for their various classes of > people > and even then it gets befuddled when one class clashes with others. The > right > wants equal rights across the board. How do you figure? Equal rights to marry. Liberals back it. Equal rights for control of ones own body. Liberals back it. Equal rights for people of all or no religion. Liberals back it. Removal of symbols of slavery and opposition from places of honor. Liberals back it. Equal rights for rich and poor. Liberals back it. Conservatives tend to reject each. And they rejected the end of slavery and of women voting and more. That is perhaps the key to understanding the difference — liberals back equal rights, conservatives back special entitlements. > >> I have noted your utter failures... > > Ummm no, you have given one liners without any substantive rebuttals. Your defense is you claim to fail to understand. Amazing. > >> and look above where you freak out over it. > > Another claim without substance. > >> You failed time and time again. But so what? This is a Usenet discussion. >> Move on. Try harder next time. Work to improve yourself. Stop beating >> yourself up over your failures in a meaningless side issue bit of nonsense >> where you tried to control someone you see as better than yourself. > > LOL... I ate your lunch again. > > >>>>> I know that you will never accomplish that, so most if not all of these >>>>> discussions are >>>>> really just people banging out their frustrations on their keyboards... >>>>> I find it most humorous indeed. >>>> >>>> After all of your failures it is not surprising to see you speak of >>>> frustrations. >>> >>> LOL... I ate your lunch... >> >> >> -- >> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They >> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel >> somehow superior by attacking the messenger. >> >> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. >> >> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 12:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <wI9WD.143796$W_2.651@fx05.iad> |
| In reply to | #2571804 |
On 12/29/2018 4:35 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/29/18 2:53 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/29/18 2:46 PM, DoD wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>> news:g8q0blF6m7aU9@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 12/29/18 11:13 AM, DoD wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:g8o8cdFpml9U3@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 12/28/18 7:13 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:g8o3f7Fok83U7@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 6:21 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The >>>>>>>>>>> Truth - >>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:50 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 3:18 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Malte Runz <malterunz@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 2:55:43 AM UTC, Cloud Hobbit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody will ever be able to stop Americans who want guns >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to get them. ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good Americans with guns would be able to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jokes aside ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 3d printing is making sure of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, is it futile to try to reduce the gun violence in the US? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely not. Let's try to reduce violence. (But why just 'gun >>>>>>>>>>>>>> violence' >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unless there's an ulterior motive involved?) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The focus on guns in this group is by design. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But the 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to connect our >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gun rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with "a well-regulated militia", meaning, in part, that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> measures should >>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed be taken to prevent improper use of arms. Indeed, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> NRA of 80 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago was heavily involved with gun safety regulations. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Amendment II >>>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a >>>>>>>>>>>> free >>>>>>>>>>>> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >>>>>>>>>>>> infringed. >>>>>>>>>>>> Yup... right there, in the same sentence, the connection with >>>>>>>>>>>> the well >>>>>>>>>>>>> regulated militia. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope. That's the reason for the amendment, Snot. The right to >>>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>>> bear arms in no way depends on the militia. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Very VERY true. The well-regulated militia is hardly a >>>>>>>>> prerequisite (and >>>>>>>>> all English speakers recognize that -- except, of course, filthy >>>>>>>>> rat liars >>>>>>>>> like Snitty). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> By all means quote the sentence about the rights to guns that does >>>>>>>> not speak of the need for a well regulated militia. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you be quiet for a little bit? Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>> >>>> By your own rules you just failed. Interesting. >>> >>> Can you explain exactly how? >> >> By your own rules. >> > > DOD Snot replying to his own lame lie-filled post again. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0mbWD.198873$zj1.19154@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #2572152 |
On 12/30/2018 1:49 PM, Snit wrote: > Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >> On 12/29/2018 4:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/29/18 2:53 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/29/18 2:46 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:g8q0blF6m7aU9@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 12/29/18 11:13 AM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:g8o8cdFpml9U3@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 7:13 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:g8o3f7Fok83U7@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 6:21 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The >>>>>>>>>>>>> Truth - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:50 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 3:18 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Malte Runz <malterunz@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 2:55:43 AM UTC, Cloud Hobbit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody will ever be able to stop Americans who want guns >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to get them. ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good Americans with guns would be able to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jokes aside ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 3d printing is making sure of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, is it futile to try to reduce the gun violence in the US? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely not. Let's try to reduce violence. (But why just 'gun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violence' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unless there's an ulterior motive involved?) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The focus on guns in this group is by design. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But the 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to connect our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gun rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with "a well-regulated militia", meaning, in part, that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> measures should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed be taken to prevent improper use of arms. Indeed, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NRA of 80 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago was heavily involved with gun safety regulations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amendment II >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> free >>>>>>>>>>>>>> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> infringed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yup... right there, in the same sentence, the connection with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the well >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regulated militia. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. That's the reason for the amendment, Snot. The right to >>>>>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms in no way depends on the militia. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Very VERY true. The well-regulated militia is hardly a >>>>>>>>>>> prerequisite (and >>>>>>>>>>> all English speakers recognize that -- except, of course, filthy >>>>>>>>>>> rat liars >>>>>>>>>>> like Snitty). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> By all means quote the sentence about the rights to guns that does >>>>>>>>>> not speak of the need for a well regulated militia. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can you be quiet for a little bit? Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>>>> >>>>>> By your own rules you just failed. Interesting. >>>>> >>>>> Can you explain exactly how? >>>> >>>> By your own rules. >>>> >>> >>> DOD >> >> Snot replying to his own lame lie-filled post again. >> > > My .sig is proof that I am incapable of good faith discussion, and only trolling. Correct again. You don't need to keep admitting this. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 12:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3v9WD.140406$IR7.112146@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #2571747 |
On 12/29/2018 1:53 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/29/18 2:46 PM, DoD wrote: >> >> >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >> news:g8q0blF6m7aU9@mid.individual.net... >>> On 12/29/18 11:13 AM, DoD wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>> news:g8o8cdFpml9U3@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 12/28/18 7:13 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:g8o3f7Fok83U7@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> On 12/28/18 6:21 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/28/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The >>>>>>>>>> Truth - >>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:50 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 3:18 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Malte Runz <malterunz@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 2:55:43 AM UTC, Cloud Hobbit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody will ever be able to stop Americans who want guns >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to get them. ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good Americans with guns would be able to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jokes aside ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 3d printing is making sure of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, is it futile to try to reduce the gun violence in the US? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely not. Let's try to reduce violence. (But why just 'gun >>>>>>>>>>>>> violence' >>>>>>>>>>>>> unless there's an ulterior motive involved?) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The focus on guns in this group is by design. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But the 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to connect our >>>>>>>>>>>>> gun rights >>>>>>>>>>>>> with "a well-regulated militia", meaning, in part, that >>>>>>>>>>>>> measures should >>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed be taken to prevent improper use of arms. Indeed, the >>>>>>>>>>>>> NRA of 80 >>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago was heavily involved with gun safety regulations. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Amendment II >>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>>>>>>>>> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >>>>>>>>>>> infringed. >>>>>>>>>>> Yup... right there, in the same sentence, the connection with >>>>>>>>>>> the well >>>>>>>>>>>> regulated militia. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nope. That's the reason for the amendment, Snot. The right to >>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>> bear arms in no way depends on the militia. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Very VERY true. The well-regulated militia is hardly a prerequisite >>>>>>>> (and >>>>>>>> all English speakers recognize that -- except, of course, filthy >>>>>>>> rat liars >>>>>>>> like Snitty). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By all means quote the sentence about the rights to guns that does >>>>>>> not speak of the need for a well regulated militia. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you be quiet for a little bit? Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>> >>>> >>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>> >>> By your own rules you just failed. Interesting. >> >> Can you explain exactly how? > > By your own rules. Cite. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8sss6Fq0r1U26@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2572133 |
Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: > On 12/29/2018 1:53 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/29/18 2:46 PM, DoD wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>> news:g8q0blF6m7aU9@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 12/29/18 11:13 AM, DoD wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:g8o8cdFpml9U3@mid.individual.net... >>>>>> On 12/28/18 7:13 PM, DoD wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:g8o3f7Fok83U7@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 6:21 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The >>>>>>>>>>> Truth - >>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:50 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 3:18 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Malte Runz <malterunz@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 2:55:43 AM UTC, Cloud Hobbit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody will ever be able to stop Americans who want guns >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to get them. ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good Americans with guns would be able to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jokes aside ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 3d printing is making sure of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, is it futile to try to reduce the gun violence in the US? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely not. Let's try to reduce violence. (But why just 'gun >>>>>>>>>>>>>> violence' >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unless there's an ulterior motive involved?) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The focus on guns in this group is by design. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But the 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to connect our >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gun rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with "a well-regulated militia", meaning, in part, that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> measures should >>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed be taken to prevent improper use of arms. Indeed, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> NRA of 80 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago was heavily involved with gun safety regulations. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Amendment II >>>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>>>>>>>>>> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >>>>>>>>>>>> infringed. >>>>>>>>>>>> Yup... right there, in the same sentence, the connection with >>>>>>>>>>>> the well >>>>>>>>>>>>> regulated militia. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope. That's the reason for the amendment, Snot. The right to >>>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>>> bear arms in no way depends on the militia. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Very VERY true. The well-regulated militia is hardly a prerequisite >>>>>>>>> (and >>>>>>>>> all English speakers recognize that -- except, of course, filthy >>>>>>>>> rat liars >>>>>>>>> like Snitty). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> By all means quote the sentence about the rights to guns that does >>>>>>>> not speak of the need for a well regulated militia. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you be quiet for a little bit? Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Your failure is noted. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Since you keep talking, I think it was your failure. >>>> >>>> By your own rules you just failed. Interesting. >>> >>> Can you explain exactly how? >> >> By your own rules. > > Cite. > See above.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 10:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <U%OVD.179697$4d4.106234@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #2571338 |
On 12/28/2018 7:35 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/28/18 7:13 PM, DoD wrote: >> >> >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >> news:g8o3f7Fok83U7@mid.individual.net... >>> On 12/28/18 6:21 PM, Ted wrote: >>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - >>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:50 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 3:18 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>>> Malte Runz <malterunz@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 2:55:43 AM UTC, Cloud Hobbit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>>>>>> Nobody will ever be able to stop Americans who want guns from being >>>>>>>>>>> able to get them. ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Good Americans with guns would be able to. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jokes aside ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ... 3d printing is making sure of that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, is it futile to try to reduce the gun violence in the US? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Absolutely not. Let's try to reduce violence. (But why just 'gun >>>>>>>>> violence' >>>>>>>>> unless there's an ulterior motive involved?) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The focus on guns in this group is by design. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But the 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to connect our gun >>>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>>> with "a well-regulated militia", meaning, in part, that measures >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> indeed be taken to prevent improper use of arms. Indeed, the NRA >>>>>>>>> of 80 >>>>>>>>> years ago was heavily involved with gun safety regulations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amendment II >>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>>>>> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >>>>>>> infringed. >>>>>>> Yup... right there, in the same sentence, the connection with the well >>>>>>>> regulated militia. >>>>> >>>>> Nope. That's the reason for the amendment, Snot. The right to keep and >>>>> bear arms in no way depends on the militia. >>>> >>>> >>>> Very VERY true. The well-regulated militia is hardly a prerequisite (and >>>> all English speakers recognize that -- except, of course, filthy rat liars >>>> like Snitty). >>>> >>> >>> By all means quote the sentence about the rights to guns that does not >>> speak of the need for a well regulated militia. >> >> Can you be quiet for a little bit? Thanks >> >> >> > > My failure is noted. And mocked! Noted and mocked, smarmy little Snot. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 10:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <FpPVD.179715$4d4.99444@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #2571338 |
On 12/28/2018 7:35 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/28/18 7:13 PM, DoD wrote: >> >> >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >> news:g8o3f7Fok83U7@mid.individual.net... >>> On 12/28/18 6:21 PM, Ted wrote: >>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - >>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:50 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 3:18 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>>> Malte Runz <malterunz@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 2:55:43 AM UTC, Cloud Hobbit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>>>>>> Nobody will ever be able to stop Americans who want guns from being >>>>>>>>>>> able to get them. ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Good Americans with guns would be able to. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jokes aside ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ... 3d printing is making sure of that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, is it futile to try to reduce the gun violence in the US? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Absolutely not. Let's try to reduce violence. (But why just 'gun >>>>>>>>> violence' >>>>>>>>> unless there's an ulterior motive involved?) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The focus on guns in this group is by design. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But the 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to connect our gun >>>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>>> with "a well-regulated militia", meaning, in part, that measures >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> indeed be taken to prevent improper use of arms. Indeed, the NRA >>>>>>>>> of 80 >>>>>>>>> years ago was heavily involved with gun safety regulations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amendment II >>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>>>>> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >>>>>>> infringed. >>>>>>> Yup... right there, in the same sentence, the connection with the well >>>>>>>> regulated militia. >>>>> >>>>> Nope. That's the reason for the amendment, Snot. The right to keep and >>>>> bear arms in no way depends on the militia. >>>> >>>> >>>> Very VERY true. The well-regulated militia is hardly a prerequisite (and >>>> all English speakers recognize that -- except, of course, filthy rat liars >>>> like Snitty). >>>> >>> >>> By all means quote the sentence about the rights to guns that does not >>> speak of the need for a well regulated militia. >> >> Can you be quiet for a little bit? Thanks >> >> >> > > Your failure is noted. Cite. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 21:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qjBVD.275985$2A7.165465@fx48.iad> |
| In reply to | #2571286 |
On 12/28/18 9:11 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/28/18 6:21 PM, Ted wrote: >> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>> On 12/28/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The >>>> Truth - >>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/18 5:50 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/18 3:18 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>> Malte Runz <malterunz@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 2:55:43 AM UTC, Cloud Hobbit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>>>> Nobody will ever be able to stop Americans who want guns from >>>>>>>>> being >>>>>>>>> able to get them. ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Good Americans with guns would be able to. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jokes aside ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ... 3d printing is making sure of that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, is it futile to try to reduce the gun violence in the US? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Absolutely not. Let's try to reduce violence. (But why just 'gun >>>>>>> violence' >>>>>>> unless there's an ulterior motive involved?) >>>>>> >>>>>> The focus on guns in this group is by design. >>>>>> >>>>>>> But the 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to connect our gun >>>>>>> rights >>>>>>> with "a well-regulated militia", meaning, in part, that measures >>>>>>> should >>>>>>> indeed be taken to prevent improper use of arms. Indeed, the NRA >>>>>>> of 80 >>>>>>> years ago was heavily involved with gun safety regulations. >>>>> >>>>> Amendment II >>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>>> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >>>>> infringed. >>>>> Yup... right there, in the same sentence, the connection with the well >>>>>> regulated militia. >>> >>> Nope. That's the reason for the amendment, Snot. The right to keep and >>> bear arms in no way depends on the militia. >> >> >> Very VERY true. The well-regulated militia is hardly a prerequisite (and >> all English speakers recognize that -- except, of course, filthy rat >> liars >> like Snitty). >> > > By all means quote the sentence about the rights to guns that does not > speak of the need for a well regulated militia. You admit that military weapons are legal because the RIGHT of the people to keep and bear arms is tied to military needs of the militia and the right to keep and bear military arms shall not be infringed by the Government because that would be disarming those who are our last defense, namely us... the people. Because we populate the militia and we do that by having the *RIGHT* of the *people* to keep and bear military type weapons so that the government can't turn the military against WE THE PEOPLE without some resistance... and no outside force can just walk in without running into street fighting like we saw in Iraq. If it costs the invaders or the people orchestrating the Coup D`etat enough blood and treasure they'll leave us alone. Our founders were pretty smart, our modern Liberals are pretty stupid. We were never meant to have a standing army because we have an armed population so you must really like TRUMP since he's sending the military home to enjoy the peace in Syria and Iraq. If you Democrats weren't warmongers then the guns needed to fight off a coup D`etat by the likes of Obama and a corrupt FBI/DOJ and DOD/CIA military industrial complex.... wouldn't be so popular. You Democrats create the very need that the Founding Fathers described for an armed population to be ready to become the militia "in a heartbeat" if they're needed. -- That's Karma Schumer the TWO FACED LIAR https://downtrend.com/71superb/heres-chuck-schumer-from-2009-saying-illegal-immigration-is-wrong/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 20:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8o7moFpfd1U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2571310 |
On 12/28/18 7:52 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty wrote: > On 12/28/18 9:11 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/28/18 6:21 PM, Ted wrote: >>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>> On 12/28/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The >>>>> Truth - >>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:50 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/28/18 3:18 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>> Malte Runz <malterunz@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 2:55:43 AM UTC, Cloud Hobbit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>>>>> Nobody will ever be able to stop Americans who want guns from >>>>>>>>>> being >>>>>>>>>> able to get them. ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Good Americans with guns would be able to. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jokes aside ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ... 3d printing is making sure of that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So, is it futile to try to reduce the gun violence in the US? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Absolutely not. Let's try to reduce violence. (But why just 'gun >>>>>>>> violence' >>>>>>>> unless there's an ulterior motive involved?) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The focus on guns in this group is by design. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But the 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to connect our gun >>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>> with "a well-regulated militia", meaning, in part, that measures >>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>> indeed be taken to prevent improper use of arms. Indeed, the NRA >>>>>>>> of 80 >>>>>>>> years ago was heavily involved with gun safety regulations. >>>>>> >>>>>> Amendment II >>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>>>> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >>>>>> infringed. >>>>>> Yup... right there, in the same sentence, the connection with the well >>>>>>> regulated militia. >>>> >>>> Nope. That's the reason for the amendment, Snot. The right to keep and >>>> bear arms in no way depends on the militia. >>> >>> >>> Very VERY true. The well-regulated militia is hardly a prerequisite (and >>> all English speakers recognize that -- except, of course, filthy rat >>> liars >>> like Snitty). >>> >> >> By all means quote the sentence about the rights to guns that does not >> speak of the need for a well regulated militia. > > You admit that military weapons are legal because the RIGHT of the > people to keep and bear arms is tied to military needs of the militia > and the right to keep and bear military arms shall not be infringed by > the Government because that would be disarming those who are our last > defense, namely us... the people. What? That sentence is very convoluted. > Because we populate the militia and > we do that by having the *RIGHT* of the *people* to keep and bear > military type weapons so that the government can't turn the military > against WE THE PEOPLE without some resistance... and no outside force > can just walk in without running into street fighting like we saw in > Iraq. So I should be able to have military type weapons. Nukes, for example. Is that what you mean? > If it costs the invaders or the people orchestrating the Coup > D`etat enough blood and treasure they'll leave us alone. Our founders > were pretty smart, our modern Liberals are pretty stupid. Actually liberals are repeatedly found to have higher IQs than conservatives. Your claim is contrary to the evidence. > We were never meant to have a standing army because we have an armed > population so you must really like TRUMP since he's sending the military > home to enjoy the peace in Syria and Iraq. He is not sending the military home from Iraq. And I am not obligated to like a completely incompetent president such as Trump. > If you Democrats weren't > warmongers then the guns needed to fight off a coup D`etat by the likes > of Obama and a corrupt FBI/DOJ and DOD/CIA military industrial > complex.... wouldn't be so popular. You Democrats Who are you even writing this to? I am not a Democrat. > create the very need > that the Founding Fathers described for an armed population to be ready > to become the militia "in a heartbeat" if they're needed. > > > > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 16:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1201331022567794608.569061ted-sam.street@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #2571330 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 12/28/18 7:52 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> On 12/28/18 9:11 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/28/18 6:21 PM, Ted wrote: >>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>> On 12/28/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The >>>>>> Truth - >>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:50 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 3:18 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>>> Malte Runz <malterunz@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 2:55:43 AM UTC, Cloud Hobbit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>>>>>> Nobody will ever be able to stop Americans who want guns from >>>>>>>>>>> being >>>>>>>>>>> able to get them. ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Good Americans with guns would be able to. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jokes aside ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ... 3d printing is making sure of that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, is it futile to try to reduce the gun violence in the US? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Absolutely not. Let's try to reduce violence. (But why just 'gun >>>>>>>>> violence' >>>>>>>>> unless there's an ulterior motive involved?) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The focus on guns in this group is by design. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But the 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to connect our gun >>>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>>> with "a well-regulated militia", meaning, in part, that measures >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> indeed be taken to prevent improper use of arms. Indeed, the NRA >>>>>>>>> of 80 >>>>>>>>> years ago was heavily involved with gun safety regulations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amendment II >>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>>>>> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >>>>>>> infringed. >>>>>>> Yup... right there, in the same sentence, the connection with the well >>>>>>>> regulated militia. >>>>> >>>>> Nope. That's the reason for the amendment, Snot. The right to keep and >>>>> bear arms in no way depends on the militia. >>>> >>>> >>>> Very VERY true. The well-regulated militia is hardly a prerequisite (and >>>> all English speakers recognize that -- except, of course, filthy rat >>>> liars >>>> like Snitty). >>>> >>> >>> By all means quote the sentence about the rights to guns that does not >>> speak of the need for a well regulated militia. >>> You admit that military weapons are legal because the RIGHT of the >> people to keep and bear arms is tied to military needs of the militia >> and the right to keep and bear military arms shall not be infringed by >> the Government because that would be disarming those who are our last >> defense, namely us... the people. > What? That sentence is very convoluted. > >> Because we populate the militia and >> we do that by having the *RIGHT* of the *people* to keep and bear >> military type weapons so that the government can't turn the military >> against WE THE PEOPLE without some resistance... and no outside force >> can just walk in without running into street fighting like we saw in >> Iraq. > > So I should be able to have military type weapons. Nukes, for example. Is > that what you mean? > >> If it costs the invaders or the people orchestrating the Coup >> D`etat enough blood and treasure they'll leave us alone. Our founders >> were pretty smart, our modern Liberals are pretty stupid. > > Actually liberals are repeatedly found to have higher IQs than > conservatives. Your claim is contrary to the evidence. Doesn't say much for most conservatives, is all. > >> We were never meant to have a standing army because we have an armed >> population so you must really like TRUMP since he's sending the military >> home to enjoy the peace in Syria and Iraq. > He is not sending the military home from Iraq. And I am not obligated to > like a completely incompetent president such as Trump. Snit only likes competent con artists like the three preceding presidents. And I agree. I don't like having to lose tax dollars to just any old buffoon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-29 17:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8ppfiF5cbpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2571534 |
Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 12/28/18 7:52 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - >> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>> On 12/28/18 9:11 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/28/18 6:21 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/2018 3:35 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/28/18 4:27 PM, Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The >>>>>>> Truth - >>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 5:50 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/28/18 3:18 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Malte Runz <malterunz@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 2:55:43 AM UTC, Cloud Hobbit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (snip) >>>>>>>>>>>> Nobody will ever be able to stop Americans who want guns from >>>>>>>>>>>> being >>>>>>>>>>>> able to get them. ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Good Americans with guns would be able to. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jokes aside ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ... 3d printing is making sure of that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, is it futile to try to reduce the gun violence in the US? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Absolutely not. Let's try to reduce violence. (But why just 'gun >>>>>>>>>> violence' >>>>>>>>>> unless there's an ulterior motive involved?) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The focus on guns in this group is by design. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But the 2nd Amendment was very clearly written to connect our gun >>>>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>>>> with "a well-regulated militia", meaning, in part, that measures >>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>> indeed be taken to prevent improper use of arms. Indeed, the NRA >>>>>>>>>> of 80 >>>>>>>>>> years ago was heavily involved with gun safety regulations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Amendment II >>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>>>>>> State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be >>>>>>>> infringed. >>>>>>>> Yup... right there, in the same sentence, the connection with the well >>>>>>>>> regulated militia. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. That's the reason for the amendment, Snot. The right to keep and >>>>>> bear arms in no way depends on the militia. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Very VERY true. The well-regulated militia is hardly a prerequisite (and >>>>> all English speakers recognize that -- except, of course, filthy rat >>>>> liars >>>>> like Snitty). >>>>> >>>> >>>> By all means quote the sentence about the rights to guns that does not >>>> speak of the need for a well regulated militia. >>>> You admit that military weapons are legal because the RIGHT of the >>> people to keep and bear arms is tied to military needs of the militia >>> and the right to keep and bear military arms shall not be infringed by >>> the Government because that would be disarming those who are our last >>> defense, namely us... the people. >> What? That sentence is very convoluted. >> >>> Because we populate the militia and >>> we do that by having the *RIGHT* of the *people* to keep and bear >>> military type weapons so that the government can't turn the military >>> against WE THE PEOPLE without some resistance... and no outside force >>> can just walk in without running into street fighting like we saw in >>> Iraq. >> >> So I should be able to have military type weapons. Nukes, for example. Is >> that what you mean? >> >>> If it costs the invaders or the people orchestrating the Coup >>> D`etat enough blood and treasure they'll leave us alone. Our founders >>> were pretty smart, our modern Liberals are pretty stupid. >> >> Actually liberals are repeatedly found to have higher IQs than >> conservatives. Your claim is contrary to the evidence. > > Doesn't say much for most conservatives, is all. > >> >>> We were never meant to have a standing army because we have an armed >>> population so you must really like TRUMP since he's sending the military >>> home to enjoy the peace in Syria and Iraq. >> He is not sending the military home from Iraq. And I am not obligated to >> like a completely incompetent president such as Trump. > > > Snit only likes competent con artists like the three preceding presidents. > And I agree. I don't like having to lose tax dollars to just any old > buffoon. > Obama was clearly better than Trump but every president since the 1989s has pushed for helping the wealthy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 36 of 49 — ← Prev page 1 … 34 35 [36] 37 38 … 49 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web