Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2171153 > unrolled thread

Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable"

Started byBob <null@null.null>
First post2016-09-20 09:50 -0400
Last post2016-09-21 23:43 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 36 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism

Contents

  Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Bob <null@null.null> - 2016-09-20 09:50 -0400
    Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-09-20 10:48 -0700
      Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-20 20:58 +0000
        Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-09-20 14:07 -0700
          Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 23:51 -0400
            Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 10:15 +1000
              Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 00:29 -0400
                Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 17:44 +1000
                  Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 23:38 -0400
                    Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 16:30 +1000
                      Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 16:30 +1000
                      Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 02:40 -0400
                        Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> - 2016-09-23 17:27 -0400
      Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-09-20 17:58 -0400
        Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-21 01:38 +0000
          Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 23:53 -0400
            Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-21 15:00 +0000
              Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 00:34 -0400
              Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 16:30 -0700
                Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-24 01:19 +0000
            Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-09-21 17:51 -0400
              Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 00:39 -0400
                Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-09-22 17:49 -0400
                  Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 23:41 -0400
                    Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-23 16:32 +1000
                      Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 02:48 -0400
                        Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-23 16:53 +0000
                          Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-24 09:03 +1000
                            Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-09-24 01:31 +0000
            Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-09-21 15:18 -0700
              Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 00:45 -0400
          Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-09-21 17:51 -0400
          Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-22 10:16 +1000
        Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-09-20 21:11 -0700
    Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" "W.T.S., ^6c1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-09-20 13:23 -0500
    Re: Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable" Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 23:43 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#2171153 — Douglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable"

FromBob <null@null.null>
Date2016-09-20 09:50 -0400
SubjectDouglas Axe presents his book "Undeniable"
Message-ID<nrrerp$1652$1@gioia.aioe.org>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2171233

FromJohn Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com>
Date2016-09-20 10:48 -0700
Message-ID<2ct2ub1ju8pro25nkdosfhioo9j741hhbu@4ax.com>
In reply to#2171153
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:


>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>
...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist attempting
to mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2171316

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-09-20 20:58 +0000
Message-ID<nrs7tp$gfc$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#2171233
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
> 
> 
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>
> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist attempting to
> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?

Boob learn!?!?!
He's ineducable.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2171319

FromJohn Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com>
Date2016-09-20 14:07 -0700
Message-ID<q693ub9t80q4soi50j8jrlvnd267gvf4mu@4ax.com>
In reply to#2171316
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
wrote:

>On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>
>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist attempting to
>> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>
>Boob learn!?!?!
>He's ineducable.
>
...now that's undeniable !

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2171512

FromOlrik <olrik666@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-20 23:51 -0400
Message-ID<nrt034$d3v$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#2171319
Le 2016-09-20 à 17:07, John Locke a écrit :
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>
>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist attempting to
>>> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>
>> Boob learn!?!?!
>> He's ineducable.
>>
> ...now that's undeniable !

... and ineluctable!


-- 
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2171892

From"Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2016-09-22 10:15 +1000
Message-ID<e4gm5fFnbtsU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#2171512
On 21/09/2016 13:51, Olrik wrote:
> Le 2016-09-20 à 17:07, John Locke a écrit :
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>>
>>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist attempting to
>>>> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>>
>>> Boob learn!?!?!
>>> He's ineducable.
>>>
>> ...now that's undeniable !
>
> ... and ineluctable!
>

Inconceivable!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2171979

FromOlrik <olrik666@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-22 00:29 -0400
Message-ID<nrvmnq$362$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#2171892
Le 2016-09-21 à 20:15, Alex W. a écrit :
> On 21/09/2016 13:51, Olrik wrote:
>> Le 2016-09-20 à 17:07, John Locke a écrit :
>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>>>
>>>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist
>>>>> attempting to
>>>>> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>>>
>>>> Boob learn!?!?!
>>>> He's ineducable.
>>>>
>>> ...now that's undeniable !
>>
>> ... and ineluctable!
>>
>
> Inconceivable!
>

Purely unbelievable!

-- 
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2172013

From"Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2016-09-22 17:44 +1000
Message-ID<e4hgebFssbgU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#2171979
On 22/09/2016 14:29, Olrik wrote:
> Le 2016-09-21 à 20:15, Alex W. a écrit :
>> On 21/09/2016 13:51, Olrik wrote:
>>> Le 2016-09-20 à 17:07, John Locke a écrit :
>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist
>>>>>> attempting to
>>>>>> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Boob learn!?!?!
>>>>> He's ineducable.
>>>>>
>>>> ...now that's undeniable !
>>>
>>> ... and ineluctable!
>>>
>>
>> Inconceivable!
>>
>
> Purely unbelievable!
>

Incroyable!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2172280

FromOlrik <olrik666@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-22 23:38 -0400
Message-ID<ns282j$ev$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#2172013
Le 2016-09-22 à 03:44, Alex W. a écrit :
> On 22/09/2016 14:29, Olrik wrote:
>> Le 2016-09-21 à 20:15, Alex W. a écrit :
>>> On 21/09/2016 13:51, Olrik wrote:
>>>> Le 2016-09-20 à 17:07, John Locke a écrit :
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist
>>>>>>> attempting to
>>>>>>> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Boob learn!?!?!
>>>>>> He's ineducable.
>>>>>>
>>>>> ...now that's undeniable !
>>>>
>>>> ... and ineluctable!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Inconceivable!
>>>
>>
>> Purely unbelievable!
>>
>
> Incroyable!

Diable!

-- 
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2172311

From"Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2016-09-23 16:30 +1000
Message-ID<e4k0ftFglm7U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#2172280
On 23/09/2016 13:38, Olrik wrote:
> Le 2016-09-22 à 03:44, Alex W. a écrit :
>> On 22/09/2016 14:29, Olrik wrote:
>>> Le 2016-09-21 à 20:15, Alex W. a écrit :
>>>> On 21/09/2016 13:51, Olrik wrote:
>>>>> Le 2016-09-20 à 17:07, John Locke a écrit :
>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist
>>>>>>>> attempting to
>>>>>>>> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Boob learn!?!?!
>>>>>>> He's ineducable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...now that's undeniable !
>>>>>
>>>>> ... and ineluctable!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Inconceivable!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Purely unbelievable!
>>>
>>
>> Incroyable!
>
> Diable!
>

Is there actually a point to swearing by non-existent deities?

:-)

Mon dieu!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2172312

From"Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2016-09-23 16:30 +1000
Message-ID<e4k0guFglm7U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#2172311
On 23/09/2016 16:30, Alex W. wrote:
> On 23/09/2016 13:38, Olrik wrote:
>> Le 2016-09-22 à 03:44, Alex W. a écrit :
>>> On 22/09/2016 14:29, Olrik wrote:
>>>> Le 2016-09-21 à 20:15, Alex W. a écrit :
>>>>> On 21/09/2016 13:51, Olrik wrote:
>>>>>> Le 2016-09-20 à 17:07, John Locke a écrit :
>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist
>>>>>>>>> attempting to
>>>>>>>>> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Boob learn!?!?!
>>>>>>>> He's ineducable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...now that's undeniable !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... and ineluctable!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Inconceivable!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Purely unbelievable!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Incroyable!
>>
>> Diable!
>>
>
> Is there actually a point to swearing by non-existent deities?
>
> :-)
>
> Mon dieu!
>

... et "par Teutates!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2172316

FromOlrik <olrik666@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-23 02:40 -0400
Message-ID<ns2inu$ug3$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#2172311
Le 2016-09-23 à 02:30, Alex W. a écrit :
> On 23/09/2016 13:38, Olrik wrote:
>> Le 2016-09-22 à 03:44, Alex W. a écrit :
>>> On 22/09/2016 14:29, Olrik wrote:
>>>> Le 2016-09-21 à 20:15, Alex W. a écrit :
>>>>> On 21/09/2016 13:51, Olrik wrote:
>>>>>> Le 2016-09-20 à 17:07, John Locke a écrit :
>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist
>>>>>>>>> attempting to
>>>>>>>>> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Boob learn!?!?!
>>>>>>>> He's ineducable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...now that's undeniable !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... and ineluctable!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Inconceivable!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Purely unbelievable!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Incroyable!
>>
>> Diable!
>>
>
> Is there actually a point to swearing by non-existent deities?
>
> :-)
>
> Mon dieu!

Palsambleu!


-- 
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2172490

FromJohn Baker <nunya@bizniz.net>
Date2016-09-23 17:27 -0400
Message-ID<vf7bubp6s4sam1qcgvgpbc7gmgrhnu4lpj@4ax.com>
In reply to#2172316
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 02:40:06 -0400, Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> wrote:

>Le 2016-09-23 à 02:30, Alex W. a écrit :
>> On 23/09/2016 13:38, Olrik wrote:
>>> Le 2016-09-22 à 03:44, Alex W. a écrit :
>>>> On 22/09/2016 14:29, Olrik wrote:
>>>>> Le 2016-09-21 à 20:15, Alex W. a écrit :
>>>>>> On 21/09/2016 13:51, Olrik wrote:
>>>>>>> Le 2016-09-20 à 17:07, John Locke a écrit :
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist
>>>>>>>>>> attempting to
>>>>>>>>>> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Boob learn!?!?!
>>>>>>>>> He's ineducable.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...now that's undeniable !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... and ineluctable!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Inconceivable!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Purely unbelievable!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Incroyable!
>>>
>>> Diable!
>>>
>>
>> Is there actually a point to swearing by non-existent deities?
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Mon dieu!
>
>Palsambleu!

Merde!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2171349

FromDon Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net>
Date2016-09-20 17:58 -0400
Message-ID<f3c3ubhtgavlsc0pdkuuo67gtjbc2blds3@4ax.com>
In reply to#2171233
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke
<johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>
>
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>
>...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist attempting
>to mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?  

As a bald grammar nazi, I must protest.  That's _hare-brained_,
dammit!

-- 
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
         Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean) 
          Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2171436

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-09-21 01:38 +0000
Message-ID<nrsoal$16c9$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#2171349
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:58:00 -0400, Don Martin wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke
> <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>
>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>
>>...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist attempting to
>>mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
> 
> As a bald grammar nazi, I must protest.  That's _hare-brained_,
> dammit!

There's no need to rabbit on about it.
And 'Nazi' should be capitalised.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2171513

FromOlrik <olrik666@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-20 23:53 -0400
Message-ID<nrt07h$d3v$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#2171436
Le 2016-09-20 à 21:38, Smiler a écrit :
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:58:00 -0400, Don Martin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke
>> <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>
>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist attempting to
>>> mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>
>> As a bald grammar nazi, I must protest.  That's _hare-brained_,
>> dammit!
>
> There's no need to rabbit on about it.
> And 'Nazi' should be capitalised.
>

Hummm... It's "capitalized".

-- 
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2171691

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-09-21 15:00 +0000
Message-ID<nru79v$1d55$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#2171513
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 23:53:27 -0400, Olrik wrote:

> Le 2016-09-20 à 21:38, Smiler a écrit :
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:58:00 -0400, Don Martin wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke
>>> <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>>
>>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist attempting
>>>> to mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>>
>>> As a bald grammar nazi, I must protest.  That's _hare-brained_,
>>> dammit!
>>
>> There's no need to rabbit on about it.
>> And 'Nazi' should be capitalised.
>>
> Hummm... It's "capitalized".

Not this side of the pond.
My UK English spelling checker didn't mark it as misspelt.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2171980

FromOlrik <olrik666@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-22 00:34 -0400
Message-ID<nrvn0o$3uc$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#2171691
Le 2016-09-21 à 11:00, Smiler a écrit :
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 23:53:27 -0400, Olrik wrote:
>
>> Le 2016-09-20 à 21:38, Smiler a écrit :
>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:58:00 -0400, Don Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke
>>>> <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>>>>>>
>>>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist attempting
>>>>> to mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>>>>
>>>> As a bald grammar nazi, I must protest.  That's _hare-brained_,
>>>> dammit!
>>>
>>> There's no need to rabbit on about it.
>>> And 'Nazi' should be capitalised.
>>>
>> Hummm... It's "capitalized".
>
> Not this side of the pond.
> My UK English spelling checker didn't mark it as misspelt.

Okay... I use the Canadian English dictionary in Thunderbird...

"capitalised" is in red, "capitalized" is OK.

Funny thing, "misspelt" is in red, and the right-click suggestion is... 
nothing much... "misspell".

English, for a French-Canadian like me, is quite confuzionistic.

-- 
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2172529

FromCloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-23 16:30 -0700
Message-ID<f3ffc1e3-5166-4363-a60b-09b9aa1fd312@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#2171691
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 8:00:21 AM UTC-7, Smiler wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 23:53:27 -0400, Olrik wrote:
> 
> > Le 2016-09-20 à 21:38, Smiler a écrit :
> >> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:58:00 -0400, Don Martin wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke
> >>> <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
> >>>>>
> >>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist attempting
> >>>> to mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
> >>>
> >>> As a bald grammar nazi, I must protest.  That's _hare-brained_,
> >>> dammit!
> >>
> >> There's no need to rabbit on about it.
> >> And 'Nazi' should be capitalised.
> >>
> > Hummm... It's "capitalized".
> 
> Not this side of the pond.
> My UK English spelling checker didn't mark it as misspelt.
> 
> -- 
> Smiler, The godless one.
> aa #2279
> Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
> to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

Growing up in Seattle, which is not that far from Canada, I got to see plenty of UK type spellings that would catch me off guard because they just seemed weird to me. Cheques, colour, programme, aeroplanes, authorised, catalogue, and so on.  Never got used to cheques.  One word that really cracks me up when Canadians say it is te word decals,  In the US we dee kals.  In Canada it's deck-als. I admit that either pronunciation sounds weird, it's just the Canadian one sounds weirder to me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2172571

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-09-24 01:19 +0000
Message-ID<ns4kbm$147m$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#2172529
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:30:07 -0700, Cloud Hobbit wrote:

> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 8:00:21 AM UTC-7, Smiler wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 23:53:27 -0400, Olrik wrote:
>> 
>> > Le 2016-09-20 à 21:38, Smiler a écrit :
>> >> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:58:00 -0400, Don Martin wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:48:02 -0700, John Locke
>> >>> <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:50:50 -0400, Bob <null@null.null> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC9Hx3WpsCk
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> ...yet another hair brained Discovery Institute apologist
>> >>>> attempting to mix god with science. Haven't you learned yet ?
>> >>>
>> >>> As a bald grammar nazi, I must protest.  That's _hare-brained_,
>> >>> dammit!
>> >>
>> >> There's no need to rabbit on about it.
>> >> And 'Nazi' should be capitalised.
>> >>
>> > Hummm... It's "capitalized".
>> 
>> Not this side of the pond.
>> My UK English spelling checker didn't mark it as misspelt.
> 
> Growing up in Seattle, which is not that far from Canada, I got to see
> plenty of UK type spellings that would catch me off guard because they
> just seemed weird to me. Cheques, colour, programme, aeroplanes,
> authorised, catalogue, and so on.  Never got used to cheques.  One word
> that really cracks me up when Canadians say it is te word decals,  In
> the US we dee kals.  In Canada it's deck-als. I admit that either
> pronunciation sounds weird, it's just the Canadian one sounds weirder to
> me.

Programme and program are two different things here.
Programme refers to a TV show or a theatre leaflet/book.
Program refers to computer code.
So I write computer programs and watch TV programmes.
Decals is a word imported from the US/Canada that is rarely used here. We 
are more likely to refer to them as logos.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism

csiph-web