Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2116613 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-31 06:58 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-06-05 01:41 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 214 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> - 2016-05-31 06:58 -0400
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 08:11 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-05-31 12:42 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 13:48 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-31 15:59 -0500
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 18:33 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-05-31 14:02 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 15:54 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-31 16:52 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-05-31 18:34 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 20:50 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 21:49 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-05-31 23:16 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 05:57 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-02 14:57 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-02 16:37 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-02 20:55 -0500
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 19:26 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-06-01 09:57 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 10:53 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 21:12 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-06-01 07:14 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-06-02 23:04 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-03 00:30 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 18:29 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 20:51 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-05-31 23:07 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 05:59 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 09:14 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-06-01 10:02 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 00:59 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Davej <galt_57@hotmail.com> - 2016-06-01 07:04 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 09:16 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 13:53 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 18:03 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 18:24 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 18:36 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 19:28 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 01:01 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 01:18 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-02 12:37 +0000
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 09:21 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 09:52 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-02 12:09 -0500
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-02 15:00 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-02 16:56 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 18:23 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-02 20:57 -0500
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-02 14:59 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 16:56 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-02 21:21 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 21:06 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 16:57 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 07:17 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-03 07:30 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 09:53 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-04 10:46 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 17:41 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-04 10:44 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 12:35 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-04 23:49 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 01:39 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Malcolm McMahon <malcolm.mc74@googlemail.com> - 2016-06-01 07:27 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 09:24 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-01 15:46 -0500
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> - 2016-06-01 20:08 -0400
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 18:09 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-01 20:59 -0500
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 22:55 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 01:20 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-02 10:56 +1000
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Malcolm McMahon <malcolm.mc74@googlemail.com> - 2016-06-03 03:21 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-04 10:01 +1000
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 01:07 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 01:21 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 01:48 -0700
"Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-02 15:19 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 16:01 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-02 16:49 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 16:03 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-02 16:52 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 18:21 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-03 06:36 +0100
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 11:46 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 13:06 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 17:43 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 17:11 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 19:20 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:43 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 22:25 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 21:35 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-04 05:15 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 19:02 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:01 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 19:02 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:00 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 19:04 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 17:46 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-06-05 01:02 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth default <default@defaulter.net> - 2016-06-03 08:53 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-03 07:32 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth default <default@defaulter.net> - 2016-06-03 12:27 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 17:44 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 17:10 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 11:36 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 09:47 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 13:07 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 18:50 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Don Kresch <no@spam.org> - 2016-06-03 18:01 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 22:22 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 21:34 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 00:04 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 01:28 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-04 04:59 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 08:37 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-04 04:54 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:02 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 19:15 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-04 05:19 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 07:39 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 22:23 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 21:36 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 00:31 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 00:14 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 12:04 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 12:29 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-04 05:16 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 07:43 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:34 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 19:08 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 23:01 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 00:42 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 18:47 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 19:06 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 00:33 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-03 20:38 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-03 21:06 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 23:29 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 00:58 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-04 05:09 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-04 05:06 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 23:12 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-04 06:22 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-06-04 12:36 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-04 15:32 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-04 15:35 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 19:22 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-04 16:52 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 21:52 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 21:00 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 19:09 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-04 20:51 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 22:02 -0400
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 21:07 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 20:53 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 01:02 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 01:05 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 19:41 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-06-04 12:49 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 13:58 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-04 15:35 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-04 15:35 -0700
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-06-04 18:51 -0500
Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-06-04 19:34 -0500
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 00:41 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 21:04 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-05-31 23:02 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 06:00 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 09:13 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-06-01 09:42 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-01 17:07 +0000
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-01 15:39 -0500
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 00:36 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Davej <galt_57@hotmail.com> - 2016-06-01 06:28 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 09:17 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 09:31 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> - 2016-06-01 13:06 -0400
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Wexford Eire <wexford.eire.1798@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 10:56 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-06-01 11:49 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 18:02 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-06-02 07:51 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-02 08:52 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-02 14:52 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-02 16:38 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing wryan1776@gmail.com - 2016-06-02 08:52 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 18:03 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 18:22 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 18:35 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-06-01 21:00 -0500
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 19:24 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-01 22:55 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 01:15 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-02 08:38 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 09:11 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-06-02 17:52 -0400
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-03 00:49 +0000
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-06-03 17:36 -0400
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-01 18:29 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 01:04 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-02 14:49 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-02 16:38 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 20:05 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 19:13 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-02 21:25 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 17:33 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-04 10:45 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-06-03 05:48 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-03 07:31 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-06-02 23:16 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2016-06-03 00:29 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-06-05 01:00 -0700
Re: Evolutionism: The Religion That Offers Nothing nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 01:41 -0700
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
| From | "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-04 10:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7Y2dnQ4w3u31js7KnZ2dnUU7-KHNnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #2119108 |
"Cloud Hobbit" wrote in message news:5f06a3be-4254-45e8-94bb-7d36a2773c1e@googlegroups.com... > Andrew wrote: >> "Wexford Eire" wrote: >> >> > Evolution is a fact. Theories as to what have evolved into what >> > may change, but the underlying fact of evolution remains. >> >> Noooooo. The "goo to you" evolution story is one of the greatest >> falsehoods of all time. > > based on what peer reviewed scientific evidence? If it is not a falsehood, then cite the peer reviewed scientific evidence that says it is true. You can't. >> The reason it has been accepted by so many >> is because they have not learned to ~think~ and to question things >> out for themselves. >> > That's exactly the reason why evolution is accepted, because we do think for ourselves. It would have been so much easier to just > reject it out of hand and say it didn't conform to the Bible. > > The problem is that would be denying the evidence. The evidence proves evolution. Then cite the peer reviewed scientific evidence that says "goo to you" evolution is true. > It has withstood 150 years of questioning by > people trying to figure things out for themselves. > > They have all come to the irrefutable position that evolution is real, Variation and adaption is what is real. > it happens and there is no evidence of anything else at work. It is observable, and testable. The 'goo to you' story is neither observable or testable. > Nothing about God of the Bible is. In > fact Jesus might scold you a little if you even ask for evidence. No, the Bible say to -->"Prove all things" 1 Thess 5:21.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-04 12:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3ac12de9-a310-43d5-8ee5-a6fdee69ccd2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2119511 |
On Saturday, June 4, 2016 at 10:44:11 AM UTC-7, Andrew wrote: > "Cloud Hobbit" wrote in message news:5f06a3be-4254-45e8-94bb-7d36a2773c1e@googlegroups.com... > > Andrew wrote: > >> "Wexford Eire" wrote: > >> > >> > Evolution is a fact. Theories as to what have evolved into what > >> > may change, but the underlying fact of evolution remains. > >> > >> Noooooo. The "goo to you" evolution story is one of the greatest > >> falsehoods of all time. > > > > based on what peer reviewed scientific evidence? > > If it is not a falsehood, then cite the peer reviewed scientific evidence > that says it is true. You can't. > > >> The reason it has been accepted by so many > >> is because they have not learned to ~think~ and to question things > >> out for themselves. > >> > > That's exactly the reason why evolution is accepted, because we do think for ourselves. It would have been so much easier to just > > reject it out of hand and say it didn't conform to the Bible. > > .> > The problem is that would be denying the evidence. The evidence proves evolution. > .> Then cite the peer reviewed scientific evidence that says "goo to you" evolution is true. Cite a peer reviewed scientific journal article in which the phrase "goo to you" even appears: Seth > > > It has withstood 150 years of questioning by > > people trying to figure things out for themselves. > > > > They have all come to the irrefutable position that evolution is real, > > Variation and adaption is what is real. > > > it happens and there is no evidence of anything else at work. It is observable, and testable. > > The 'goo to you' story is neither observable or testable. > > > Nothing about God of the Bible is. In > > fact Jesus might scold you a little if you even ask for evidence. > > No, the Bible say to -->"Prove all things" 1 Thess 5:21.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-04 23:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3oydnbwYUrD8Vs7KnZ2dnUU7-aXNnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #2119598 |
"nature bats last" wrote in message news:3ac12de9-a310-43d5-8ee5-a6fdee69ccd2@googlegroups.com... > Andrew wrote: >> "Cloud Hobbit" wrote: >> > Andrew wrote: >> >> "Wexford Eire" wrote: >> >> >> >> > Evolution is a fact. Theories as to what have evolved into what >> >> > may change, but the underlying fact of evolution remains. >> >> >> >> Noooooo. The "goo to you" evolution story is one of the greatest >> >> falsehoods of all time. >> > >> > based on what peer reviewed scientific evidence? >> >> If it is not a falsehood, then cite the peer reviewed scientific evidence >> that says it is true. You can't. >> >> >> The reason it has been accepted by so many >> >> is because they have not learned to ~think~ and to question things >> >> out for themselves. >> >> >> > That's exactly the reason why evolution is accepted, because we do >> > think for ourselves. It would have been so much easier to just >> > reject it out of hand and say it didn't conform to the Bible. >> > > > .> > The problem is that would be denying the evidence. The evidence proves evolution. >> > .> Then cite the peer reviewed scientific evidence that says "goo to you" evolution is true. > > Cite a peer reviewed scientific journal article in > which the phrase "goo to you" even appears: No problem --> http://alturl.com/m23jg The "goo to you" phrase is a simplification of what is taught, and what the gullible believe in the area of origins. Do you not believe it? Then what is the only other option? Creation. If "goo to you" is not true..then you need to consider Creation as the methodology of our origins. Can you think of any other option? No.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-05 01:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fb463118-9565-4011-98e6-0d86e537f854@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2119954 |
On Saturday, June 4, 2016 at 11:49:09 PM UTC-7, Andrew wrote: > "nature bats last" wrote in message news:3ac12de9-a310-43d5-8ee5-a6fdee69ccd2@googlegroups.com... > > Andrew wrote: > >> "Cloud Hobbit" wrote: > >> > Andrew wrote: > >> >> "Wexford Eire" wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Evolution is a fact. Theories as to what have evolved into what > >> >> > may change, but the underlying fact of evolution remains. > >> >> > >> >> Noooooo. The "goo to you" evolution story is one of the greatest > >> >> falsehoods of all time. > >> > > >> > based on what peer reviewed scientific evidence? > >> > >> If it is not a falsehood, then cite the peer reviewed scientific evidence > >> that says it is true. You can't. > >> > >> >> The reason it has been accepted by so many > >> >> is because they have not learned to ~think~ and to question things > >> >> out for themselves. > >> >> > >> > That's exactly the reason why evolution is accepted, because we do > >> > think for ourselves. It would have been so much easier to just > >> > reject it out of hand and say it didn't conform to the Bible. > >> > > > > > .> > The problem is that would be denying the evidence. The evidence proves evolution. > >> > > .> Then cite the peer reviewed scientific evidence that says "goo to you" evolution is true. > > .> > Cite a peer reviewed scientific journal article in .> > which the phrase "goo to you" even appears: > .> No problem --> http://alturl.com/m23jg Actually, you do appear to have a problem. Specifically, understanding the phrase "peer reviewed scientific journal article". A list of books and creationist websites and letter-to- the-editor opinions pieces is no such thing. > .> The "goo to you" phrase is a simplification of .> what is taught, and what the gullible believe in .> the area of origins. > .> Do you not believe it? What I do believe, what I in fact know, is that in over fifty years of reading science, from popularizations to, yes ."peer reviewed scientific journal articles", I have yet to come across the phrase "goo to you". Which means that it is not something that scientists involve themselves with, but rather a creationist straw man. Come back when you can state it both succinctly and accurately in terms that involve actual science. Seth > Then what is the only > other option? > > Creation. > > If "goo to you" is not true..then you need to > consider Creation as the methodology of our > origins. > > Can you think of any other option? > > No.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Malcolm McMahon <malcolm.mc74@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-01 07:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b00d86f3-a0bd-40ff-b003-ad2068b54084@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2116695 |
On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 16:11:21 UTC+1, Wexford Eire wrote: > On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 6:58:20 AM UTC-4, Robert Duncan wrote: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts > > YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion too. The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to create humans.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-01 09:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <aKudnegTOs3TkdLKnZ2dnUU7-dXNnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #2117355 |
"Malcolm McMahon" wrote in message news:b00d86f3-a0bd-40ff-b003-ad2068b54084@googlegroups.com...
> Wexford Eire wrote:
>> Robert Duncan wrote:
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts
>>
>> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy.
>
> Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion too.
>
> The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to create humans.
Yes, because this is what happened long ago:
"God created man in His own image, in the image
of God created He him; male and female created
He them." ~ God
Male and female.
Irreducibly complex.
Created by our most awesome and wonderful Creator . . .
God.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-01 15:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA61AA0A836841noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2117430 |
"Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> wrote in news:aKudnegTOs3TkdLKnZ2dnUU7-dXNnZ2d@earthlink.com: > "Malcolm McMahon" wrote in message > news:b00d86f3-a0bd-40ff-b003-ad2068b54084@googlegroups.com... >> Wexford Eire wrote: >>> Robert Duncan wrote: >>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts >>> >>> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. >> >> Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by >> anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion >> too. >> >> The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to >> create humans. > > Yes, because this is what happened long ago: > > "God created man in His own image, in the image > of God created He him; male and female created > He them." ~ God And God said, Let us make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness" Genesis. 1:26 So, like, what other gods were there?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-01 20:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Y_SdnfF2l9pH0dLKnZ2dnUU7-a3NnZ2d@supernews.com> |
| In reply to | #2117614 |
On 6/1/2016 4:46 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote: > "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> wrote in > news:aKudnegTOs3TkdLKnZ2dnUU7-dXNnZ2d@earthlink.com: > >> "Malcolm McMahon" wrote in message >> news:b00d86f3-a0bd-40ff-b003-ad2068b54084@googlegroups.com... >>> Wexford Eire wrote: >>>> Robert Duncan wrote: >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts >>>> >>>> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. >>> >>> Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by >>> anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion >>> too. >>> >>> The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to >>> create humans. >> >> Yes, because this is what happened long ago: >> >> "God created man in His own image, in the image >> of God created He him; male and female created >> He them." ~ God > > > > And God said, Let us make man in OUR image, > after OUR likeness" Genesis. 1:26 > > > So, like, what other gods were there? It's not meant for you to know. "Do not give dogs what is holy, and do not throw your pearls before pigs." (Matthew 7:6)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-01 18:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bL-dnXSrC9OkGtLKnZ2dnUU7-RXNnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #2117614 |
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:XnsA61AA0A836841noemailattnet@216.166.97.131... > "Andrew" wrote: > >> "Malcolm McMahon" wrote: >>> Wexford Eire wrote: >>>> Robert Duncan wrote: >>>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts >>>> >>>> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. >>> >>> Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by >>> anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion >>> too. >>> >>> The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to >>> create humans. >> >> Yes, because this is what happened long ago: >> >> "God created man in His own image, in the image >> of God created He him; male and female created >> He them." ~ God > > And God said, Let us make man in OUR > image, after OUR likeness" Genesis. 1:26 We have an awesome Creator.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-01 20:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA61AD5BDC44E5noemailattnet@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #2117759 |
"Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> wrote in
news:bL-dnXSrC9OkGtLKnZ2dnUU7-RXNnZ2d@earthlink.com:
> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
> news:XnsA61AA0A836841noemailattnet@216.166.97.131...
>> "Andrew" wrote: >
>>> "Malcolm McMahon" wrote:
>>>> Wexford Eire wrote:
>>>>> Robert Duncan wrote:
>>>>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts
>>>>>
>>>>> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy.
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by
>>>> anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion
>>>> too.
>>>>
>>>> The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to
>>>> create humans.
>>>
>>> Yes, because this is what happened long ago:
>>>
>>> "God created man in His own image, in the image
>>> of God created He him; male and female created
>>> He them." ~ God
>>
>> And God said, Let us make man in OUR
>> image, after OUR likeness" Genesis. 1:26
Evasion noted.
Who else was your god referring by OUR image
and OUR likeness?
>
> We have an awesome Creator.
>
>
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-01 22:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <y-qdnaMrVv7TV9LKnZ2dnUU7-QfNnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #2117781 |
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:XnsA61AD5BDC44E5noemailattnet@216.166.97.131... > "Andrew" wrote: >> "Mitchell Holman" wrote: >>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>> "Malcolm McMahon" wrote: >>>>> Wexford Eire wrote: >>>>>> Robert Duncan wrote: >>>>>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts >>>>>> >>>>>> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. >>>>> >>>>> Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by >>>>> anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion >>>>> too. >>>>> >>>>> The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to >>>>> create humans. >>>> >>>> Yes, because this is what happened long ago: >>>> >>>> "God created man in His own image, in the image >>>> of God created He him; male and female created >>>> He them." ~ God >>> >>> And God said, Let us make man in OUR >>> image, after OUR likeness" Genesis. 1:26 > > Evasion noted. > > Who else was your god referring by OUR image > and OUR likeness? I have no 'god'..only the awesome *God* "There are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one." ~ 1 John 5:7
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-02 01:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <71b3670b-dba8-4be5-876f-9b82e5132412@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2117781 |
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 6:59:34 PM UTC-7, Mitchell Holman wrote: > "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> wrote in > news:bL-dnXSrC9OkGtLKnZ2dnUU7-RXNnZ2d@earthlink.com: > > > "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message > > news:XnsA61AA0A836841noemailattnet@216.166.97.131... > >> "Andrew" wrote: > > >>> "Malcolm McMahon" wrote: > >>>> Wexford Eire wrote: > >>>>> Robert Duncan wrote: > >>>>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts > >>>>> > >>>>> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. > >>>> > >>>> Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by > >>>> anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion > >>>> too. > >>>> > >>>> The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to > >>>> create humans. > >>> > >>> Yes, because this is what happened long ago: > >>> > >>> "God created man in His own image, in the image > >>> of God created He him; male and female created > >>> He them." ~ God > >> > >> And God said, Let us make man in OUR > >> image, after OUR likeness" Genesis. 1:26 > > > Evasion noted. > > Who else was your god referring by OUR image > and OUR likeness? > > > Has nothing to do with the truth of evolution and what you think might be going on if not evolution?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-02 10:56 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <dr9ei0F9e4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2117430 |
On 02/06/2016 02:24, Andrew wrote: > "Malcolm McMahon" wrote in message > news:b00d86f3-a0bd-40ff-b003-ad2068b54084@googlegroups.com... >> Wexford Eire wrote: >>> Robert Duncan wrote: >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts >>> >>> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. >> >> Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by >> anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion >> too. >> >> The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to >> create humans. > > Yes, because this is what happened long ago: > > "God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He > him; male and female created He them." ~ God > > Male and female. > > Irreducibly complex. > > Created by our most awesome and wonderful Creator . . . God. > > Irreducibly complex? Asexual reproduction would have been much easier and much less complex ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Malcolm McMahon <malcolm.mc74@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-03 03:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <30cb0dbd-41ff-484a-a8fd-25407f8056d3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2117746 |
On Thursday, 2 June 2016 01:56:36 UTC+1, Alex W. wrote: > On 02/06/2016 02:24, Andrew wrote: > > "Malcolm McMahon" wrote in message > > news:b00d86f3-a0bd-40ff-b003-ad2068b54084@googlegroups.com... > >> Wexford Eire wrote: > >>> Robert Duncan wrote: > >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts > >>> > >>> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. > >> > >> Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by > >> anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion > >> too. > >> > >> The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to > >> create humans. > > > > Yes, because this is what happened long ago: > > > > "God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He > > him; male and female created He them." ~ God > > > > Male and female. > > > > Irreducibly complex. > > > > Created by our most awesome and wonderful Creator . . . God. > > > > > > Irreducibly complex? > Not really. Even today there are people of intermediate gender. > Asexual reproduction would have been much easier and much less complex But guess what? Sexual reproduction speeds evolution. ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-04 10:01 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <drek1qF1gjhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2118687 |
On 03/06/2016 20:21, Malcolm McMahon wrote: > On Thursday, 2 June 2016 01:56:36 UTC+1, Alex W. wrote: >> On 02/06/2016 02:24, Andrew wrote: >>> "Malcolm McMahon" wrote in message >>> news:b00d86f3-a0bd-40ff-b003-ad2068b54084@googlegroups.com... >>>> Wexford Eire wrote: >>>>> Robert Duncan wrote: >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts >>>>> >>>>> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. >>>> >>>> Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by >>>> anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion >>>> too. >>>> >>>> The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to >>>> create humans. >>> >>> Yes, because this is what happened long ago: >>> >>> "God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He >>> him; male and female created He them." ~ God >>> >>> Male and female. >>> >>> Irreducibly complex. >>> >>> Created by our most awesome and wonderful Creator . . . God. >>> >>> >> >> Irreducibly complex? >> > > Not really. Even today there are people of intermediate gender. I'd prefer indeterminate or intersex -- intermediate implies a valid third sex which would be hard to confirm given that even true hermaphrodites will fall on the side of one sex or the other on some of the criteria used. > > >> Asexual reproduction would have been much easier and much less complex > > > But guess what? Sexual reproduction speeds evolution. > It does indeed, and that is why it is the dominant form of reproduction. But the question was about irreducible complexity, not the most successful or necessary complexity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-02 01:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1f3317aa-2229-4202-b17e-f3a7f6be9ee0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2117430 |
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 9:24:49 AM UTC-7, Andrew wrote: > "Malcolm McMahon" wrote in message news:b00d86f3-a0bd-40ff-b003-ad2068b54084@googlegroups.com... > > Wexford Eire wrote: > >> Robert Duncan wrote: > >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts > >> > >> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. > > > > Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion too. > > > > The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to create humans. > > Yes, because this is what happened long ago: > > "God created man in His own image, in the image > of God created He him; male and female created > He them." ~ God > > Male and female. > > Irreducibly complex. > > Created by our most awesome and wonderful Creator . . . > God. What a lovely little fairy tale in nice language. No such thing as irreducibly complex. Things are as complex as they need to be, no more, no less.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-02 01:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a89dfaa9-2a68-4cf4-a541-22b4a1877361@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2117924 |
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 1:07:08 AM UTC-7, Cloud Hobbit wrote: > On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 9:24:49 AM UTC-7, Andrew wrote: > > "Malcolm McMahon" wrote in message news:b00d86f3-a0bd-40ff-b003-ad2068b54084@googlegroups.com... > > > Wexford Eire wrote: > > >> Robert Duncan wrote: > > >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts > > >> > > >> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. > > > > > > Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion too. > > > > > > The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to create humans. > > > > Yes, because this is what happened long ago: > > > > "God created man in His own image, in the image > > of God created He him; male and female created > > He them." ~ God > > > > Male and female. > > > > Irreducibly complex. > > > > Created by our most awesome and wonderful Creator . . . > > God. > > What a lovely little fairy tale in nice language. > > No such thing as irreducibly complex. Things are as complex as they need to be, no more, no less. "Irreducible complexity" is one of those phrases, like "genetic limits" and "specified information" and "complex specified information" that Andrew has been challenged many many many times to define in his own words. Challenges which he has ignored an equal number of times. Obviously, this speaks for itself. Seth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-02 01:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2b6de77a-ef0e-4dc1-a2b2-62e320e69df4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2117929 |
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 1:21:55 AM UTC-7, nature bats last wrote: > On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 1:07:08 AM UTC-7, Cloud Hobbit wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 9:24:49 AM UTC-7, Andrew wrote: > > > "Malcolm McMahon" wrote in message news:b00d86f3-a0bd-40ff-b003-ad2068b54084@googlegroups.com... > > > > Wexford Eire wrote: > > > >> Robert Duncan wrote: > > > >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znXF0S6D_Ts > > > >> > > > >> YAWN. Evolution is a fact, not a religion. Grow up, video-boy. > > > > > > > > Hmmm.. Some people kind of _turn_ it into a religion by anthropomorphising it. Believing in "mother" nature is a religion too. > > > > > > > > The most pernicious form is the belief that evolution set out to create humans. > > > > > > Yes, because this is what happened long ago: > > > > > > "God created man in His own image, in the image > > > of God created He him; male and female created > > > He them." ~ God > > > > > > Male and female. > > > > > > Irreducibly complex. > > > > > > Created by our most awesome and wonderful Creator . . . > > > God. > > > > What a lovely little fairy tale in nice language. > > > > No such thing as irreducibly complex. Things are as complex as they need to be, no more, no less. > .> "Irreducible complexity" is one of those phrases, like .> "genetic limits" and "specified information" and .> "complex specified information" that Andrew has been .> challenged many many many times to define in his .> own words. > .> Challenges which he has ignored an equal number of times. However, for inquiring minds... http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity#Response_of_the_scientific_community http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/behe.html Seth > > Obviously, this speaks for itself. > > > Seth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-02 15:19 -0700 |
| Subject | "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth |
| Message-ID | <8eGdndU83IBzLc3KnZ2dnUU7-bPNnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #2117929 |
"nature bats last" wrote in message news:a89dfaa9-2a68-4cf4-a541-22b4a1877361@googlegroups.com...
> "Irreducible complexity" is one of those phrases, like
> "genetic limits" and "specified information" and
> "complex specified information" that Andrew has been
> challenged many many many times to define in his
> own words.
"Something would be irreducibly complex if it
is composed of multiple interacting parts, each
of which contribute to its effective functioning.
Where the removal of any one of the parts will
cause it to cease to function effectively."
~ Andrew
In the biological world there are myriads of
irreducibly complex systems and structures.
All of the biological parts of these systems
and structures must be in place at the exact
same time in order for these systems to do
what they are suposed to do.
More powerful evidence for creation by
a most awesome and wonderful Creator
for those who want to know the truth.
Andrew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nature bats last <seqklogw@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-02 16:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: "Irreducible complexity". . for those who want to know the truth |
| Message-ID | <f3f6f9e3-bae0-4ad9-9c09-f42d280ab9dd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2118362 |
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 3:19:29 PM UTC-7, Andrew wrote: > "nature bats last" wrote in message news:a89dfaa9-2a68-4cf4-a541-22b4a1877361@googlegroups.com... > > > "Irreducible complexity" is one of those phrases, like > > "genetic limits" and "specified information" and > > "complex specified information" that Andrew has been > > challenged many many many times to define in his > > own words. > .> "Something would be irreducibly complex if it .> is composed of multiple interacting parts, each .> of which contribute to its effective functioning. > .> Where the removal of any one of the parts will .> cause it to cease to function effectively." > .> ~ Andrew Congratulations; you're now a Class IV Googlicator. > > .> In the biological world there are myriads of .> irreducibly complex systems and structures. "Myriads", are there? Actually....no: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity#Response_of_the_scientific_community http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB200_1.html http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/evol/DI/clot/Clotting.html http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB301.html http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/ICsilly.html http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/behe/review.html http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity And of course no on says it quite like ol' PZ: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2014/04/25/irreducible-complexity-again/ Seth > > All of the biological parts of these systems > and structures must be in place at the exact > same time in order for these systems to do > what they are suposed to do. > > More powerful evidence for creation by > a most awesome and wonderful Creator > for those who want to know the truth. > > > Andrew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web