Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2082327 > unrolled thread

Re: Christian Conservative Calling For The Execution Of...............Girl Scouts?

Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Christian Conservative Calling For The Execution Of...............Girl Scouts? Deanna Earley <dee@earlsoft.co.uk> - 2016-03-30 09:13 +0100
    Re: Christian Conservative Calling For The Execution Of...............Girl Scouts? Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) - 2016-03-30 13:17 +0000
      Re: Christian Conservative Calling For The Execution Of...............Girl Scouts? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-30 19:06 +0100
        Re: Christian Conservative Calling For The Execution Of...............Girl Scouts? Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) - 2016-03-30 19:20 +0000
          Re: Christian Conservative Calling For The Execution Of...............Girl Scouts? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-31 08:20 +0100
            Re: Christian Conservative Calling For The Execution Of...............Girl Scouts? Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) - 2016-03-31 14:24 +0000
        Re: Christian Conservative Calling For The Execution Of...............Girl Scouts? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-31 00:25 -0700
          Re: Christian Conservative Calling For The Execution Of...............Girl Scouts? Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) - 2016-03-31 14:31 +0000

#2082327 — Re: Christian Conservative Calling For The Execution Of...............Girl Scouts?

On 21/03/2016 11:39, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:42:29 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>> On 21/03/2016 00:05, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>> I agree with possible. But there is no reason to. I'd hate to think
>>> what I might do if Christian morals didn't hold me back.
>>
>> Are you truly that weak?
>>
>> Do you really believe that all that is holding you back from doing evil 
>> is the fear of an all-powerful god's displeasure and punishment?
> 
> Yep. Otherwise I would attempt to destroy most of the losers
> responding to me here.

So you want to murder people, just scared of eternal damnation?
I however am not because I know it's just bad to take other people's
lives (without asking first).

-- 
Deanna Earley (dee@earlsoft.co.uk, dee@doesnotcompute.co.uk)

(Replies direct to my email address will be printed, shredded then fed
to the rats. Please reply to the group.)

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2082390

On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:13:26 +0100, Deanna Earley <dee@earlsoft.co.uk>
wrote:

>On 21/03/2016 11:39, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:42:29 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>> On 21/03/2016 00:05, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>>> I agree with possible. But there is no reason to. I'd hate to think
>>>> what I might do if Christian morals didn't hold me back.
>>>
>>> Are you truly that weak?
>>>
>>> Do you really believe that all that is holding you back from doing evil 
>>> is the fear of an all-powerful god's displeasure and punishment?
>> 
>> Yep. Otherwise I would attempt to destroy most of the losers
>> responding to me here.
>
>So you want to murder people, just scared of eternal damnation?
>I however am not because I know it's just bad to take other people's
>lives (without asking first).
>
>-- 
>Deanna Earley (dee@earlsoft.co.uk, dee@doesnotcompute.co.uk)

Non-religious people are free to believe anthing they wish because
there is no guide or standard set for them. Obvously having such a
standard is not a guarantee of compliance. But religious people have
standards of decency - non-religious people don't.

If I was not a Christian I would only need to please myself - just
like any other non-Christian.

Hugh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2082554

On 30/03/2016 14:17, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:13:26 +0100, Deanna Earley <dee@earlsoft.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> On 21/03/2016 11:39, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:42:29 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 21/03/2016 00:05, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>>>> I agree with possible. But there is no reason to. I'd hate to think
>>>>> what I might do if Christian morals didn't hold me back.
>>>>
>>>> Are you truly that weak?
>>>>
>>>> Do you really believe that all that is holding you back from doing evil
>>>> is the fear of an all-powerful god's displeasure and punishment?
>>>
>>> Yep. Otherwise I would attempt to destroy most of the losers
>>> responding to me here.
>>
>> So you want to murder people, just scared of eternal damnation?
>> I however am not because I know it's just bad to take other people's
>> lives (without asking first).
>>
>> --
>> Deanna Earley (dee@earlsoft.co.uk, dee@doesnotcompute.co.uk)
>
> Non-religious people are free to believe anthing they wish because
> there is no guide or standard set for them. Obvously having such a
> standard is not a guarantee of compliance. But religious people have
> standards of decency - non-religious people don't.
>
> If I was not a Christian I would only need to please myself - just
> like any other non-Christian.

Standards of decency?
News flash -- suicide bombers are RELIGIOUS PEOPLE.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2082589

On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:06:11 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

>On 30/03/2016 14:17, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:13:26 +0100, Deanna Earley <dee@earlsoft.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/03/2016 11:39, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:42:29 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 21/03/2016 00:05, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>>>>> I agree with possible. But there is no reason to. I'd hate to think
>>>>>> what I might do if Christian morals didn't hold me back.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you truly that weak?
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you really believe that all that is holding you back from doing evil
>>>>> is the fear of an all-powerful god's displeasure and punishment?
>>>>
>>>> Yep. Otherwise I would attempt to destroy most of the losers
>>>> responding to me here.
>>>
>>> So you want to murder people, just scared of eternal damnation?
>>> I however am not because I know it's just bad to take other people's
>>> lives (without asking first).
>>>
>>> --
>>> Deanna Earley (dee@earlsoft.co.uk, dee@doesnotcompute.co.uk)
>>
>> Non-religious people are free to believe anthing they wish because
>> there is no guide or standard set for them. Obvously having such a
>> standard is not a guarantee of compliance. But religious people have
>> standards of decency - non-religious people don't.
>>
>> If I was not a Christian I would only need to please myself - just
>> like any other non-Christian.
>
>Standards of decency?
>News flash -- suicide bombers are RELIGIOUS PEOPLE.

What part of non-Christian is too complex for your feeble brain to
grasp?

Hugh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2082805

On 30/03/2016 20:20, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:06:11 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> On 30/03/2016 14:17, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:13:26 +0100, Deanna Earley <dee@earlsoft.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 21/03/2016 11:39, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:42:29 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 21/03/2016 00:05, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>>>>>> I agree with possible. But there is no reason to. I'd hate to think
>>>>>>> what I might do if Christian morals didn't hold me back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you truly that weak?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you really believe that all that is holding you back from doing evil
>>>>>> is the fear of an all-powerful god's displeasure and punishment?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep. Otherwise I would attempt to destroy most of the losers
>>>>> responding to me here.
>>>>
>>>> So you want to murder people, just scared of eternal damnation?
>>>> I however am not because I know it's just bad to take other people's
>>>> lives (without asking first).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Deanna Earley (dee@earlsoft.co.uk, dee@doesnotcompute.co.uk)
>>>
>>> Non-religious people are free to believe anthing they wish because
>>> there is no guide or standard set for them. Obvously having such a
>>> standard is not a guarantee of compliance. But religious people have
>>> standards of decency - non-religious people don't.
>>>
>>> If I was not a Christian I would only need to please myself - just
>>> like any other non-Christian.
>>
>> Standards of decency?
>> News flash -- suicide bombers are RELIGIOUS PEOPLE.
>
> What part of non-Christian is too complex for your feeble brain to
> grasp?
>

Then you have to find ways to actually express yourself precisely.

You made a general statement about religious people.  You were not 
speaking about yourself.  or are you now a "people"?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2082914

.On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:20:42 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

>On 30/03/2016 20:20, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:06:11 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 30/03/2016 14:17, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:13:26 +0100, Deanna Earley <dee@earlsoft.co.uk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 21/03/2016 11:39, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:42:29 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 21/03/2016 00:05, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>>>>>>>> I agree with possible. But there is no reason to. I'd hate to think
>>>>>>>> what I might do if Christian morals didn't hold me back.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you truly that weak?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you really believe that all that is holding you back from doing evil
>>>>>>> is the fear of an all-powerful god's displeasure and punishment?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep. Otherwise I would attempt to destroy most of the losers
>>>>>> responding to me here.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you want to murder people, just scared of eternal damnation?
>>>>> I however am not because I know it's just bad to take other people's
>>>>> lives (without asking first).
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Deanna Earley (dee@earlsoft.co.uk, dee@doesnotcompute.co.uk)
>>>>
>>>> Non-religious people are free to believe anthing they wish because
>>>> there is no guide or standard set for them. Obvously having such a
>>>> standard is not a guarantee of compliance. But religious people have
>>>> standards of decency - non-religious people don't.
>>>>
>>>> If I was not a Christian I would only need to please myself - just
>>>> like any other non-Christian.
>>>
>>> Standards of decency?
>>> News flash -- suicide bombers are RELIGIOUS PEOPLE.
>>
>> What part of non-Christian is too complex for your feeble brain to
>> grasp?
>>
>
>Then you have to find ways to actually express yourself precisely.
>
>You made a general statement about religious people.  You were not 
>speaking about yourself.  or are you now a "people"?

I quote me...
>Obvously having such a
>>>> standard is not a guarantee of compliance. But religious people have
>>>> standards of decency - non-religious people don't.

That's about as precise as it gets. I'm not going to draw pictures for
you.

Take a class in reading comprehension when you graduate from junior
high school.

Hugh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2082806

In article <dm2islFgn9vU1@mid.individual.net>,
 "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> On 30/03/2016 14:17, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:13:26 +0100, Deanna Earley <dee@earlsoft.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 21/03/2016 11:39, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:42:29 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On 21/03/2016 00:05, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >>>>> I agree with possible. But there is no reason to. I'd hate to think
> >>>>> what I might do if Christian morals didn't hold me back.
> >>>>
> >>>> Are you truly that weak?
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you really believe that all that is holding you back from doing evil
> >>>> is the fear of an all-powerful god's displeasure and punishment?
> >>>
> >>> Yep. Otherwise I would attempt to destroy most of the losers
> >>> responding to me here.
> >>
> >> So you want to murder people, just scared of eternal damnation?
> >> I however am not because I know it's just bad to take other people's
> >> lives (without asking first).
> >>
> >> --
> >> Deanna Earley (dee@earlsoft.co.uk, dee@doesnotcompute.co.uk)
> >
> > Non-religious people are free to believe anthing they wish because
> > there is no guide or standard set for them. Obvously having such a
> > standard is not a guarantee of compliance. But religious people have
> > standards of decency - non-religious people don't.
> >
> > If I was not a Christian I would only need to please myself

Only if you lived in a fucking cave.

The rest of us have plenty of other people we choose to please.



> > - just
> > like any other non-Christian.
> 
> Standards of decency?
> News flash -- suicide bombers are RELIGIOUS PEOPLE.

Exactly.

-- 

JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to 
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake 
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2082917

On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:25:10 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
<hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:


>> > If I was not a Christian I would only need to please myself
>
>Only if you lived in a fucking cave.

>The rest of us have plenty of other people we choose to please.

That confirms my presumption that you are paid to please others. Does
the madam pay you well?

Hugh

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism

csiph-web