Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2070444 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-05 11:24 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-06 12:17 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 63 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: let me help you out in your thinking "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-05 11:24 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:29 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-05 21:21 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-05 16:39 -0500
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-05 23:04 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-05 19:31 -0500
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-06 18:17 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-06 15:15 -0500
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-03-06 04:11 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 09:44 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-06 10:26 -0500
Re: let me help you out in your thinking "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 16:28 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-06 15:15 -0500
Re: let me help you out in your thinking "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 14:00 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-07 19:41 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-07 18:30 -0500
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-03-08 07:08 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-08 08:42 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 23:59 -0500
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-07 18:30 -0500
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-08 18:29 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-08 18:02 -0500
Re: let me help you out in your thinking "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-06 16:27 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 12:49 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-07 19:57 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 12:14 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 14:22 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-07 21:41 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-08 18:34 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-11 19:54 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 12:26 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-12 19:52 +0000
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 14:19 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 10:51 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 11:46 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 12:26 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 03:15 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 10:17 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 18:41 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 11:22 -0700
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 10:46 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 13:27 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 15:28 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 03:03 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 15:28 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 18:07 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 12:20 -0700
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 02:56 -0700
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 09:48 -0700
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 16:31 -0700
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 09:53 -0700
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 16:40 -0700
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 10:36 -0700
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 11:14 -0700
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 11:00 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 11:02 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 18:44 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 11:22 -0700
Re: let me help you out in your thinking hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-11 13:04 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking Prince Michael <quarke.e2@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 13:09 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-12 02:50 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-07 21:40 -0800
Re: let me help you out in your thinking hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-06 12:17 -0800
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 11:24 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: let me help you out in your thinking |
| Message-ID | <1dc4340f-af96-47ad-b332-cd43b6eaeb00@googlegroups.com> |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 6:59:56 AM UTC-5, hypatiab7 wrote: > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 3:58:00 PM UTC-5, Syd M. wrote: > > On Sunday, February 28, 2016 at 2:46:45 AM UTC-5, hypatiab7 wrote: > > > On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 3:08:57 PM UTC-5, nature bats last wrote: > > > > On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 11:52:30 AM UTC-7, Prince Michael wrote: > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athanasian_Creed > > > > > > > > > > > > > .> Such as the Father is; such is the Son > > > > > > > > > .> That means whatever the father is, is what the son is. > > > > > > > > > .> Conversely, whatever the son is, is what the father is. > > > > > > > > He's got a point: if one doesn't exist, neither does the other. > > > > > > Oh, darn! I was just going to ask what that makes the Holey Whatsit. > > > The non-existent spare? > > > > > > > > You know you'd never get a straight answer. > > > From our ever-present trolls? When do we ever? Thats the point, yes. PDW
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prince Michael <t2judgment@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 11:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2174a226-9092-4868-822c-6e64b26d12b3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2070444 |
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to type needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply to a thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter or mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 21:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbfili$ljr$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2070450 |
On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote: > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: > > The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they > make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to type > needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply to a > thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter or > mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues. The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. That reminds me: Where is my £60 million? -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 16:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7akmdb1104ddlf1pt68cstbafush382u4v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2070503 |
On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
wrote:
>On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote:
>>
>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they
>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to type
>> needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply to a
>> thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter or
>> mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues.
>
>The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god
>character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply.
>Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar.
>Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence.
>
>That reminds me: Where is my £60 million?
I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go
the whole hog, go posh and do guineas?
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 23:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbfomj$12ne$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2070514 |
On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:39:18 -0500, Don Martin wrote: > On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote: >> >>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: >>> >>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they >>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to >>> type needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply >>> to a thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter >>> or mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues. >> >>The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god >>character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. Until you >>supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. Beliefs, opinions and >>'holy' books are NOT evidence. >> >>That reminds me: Where is my £60 million? > > I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go > the whole hog, go posh and do guineas? Ooops! Typo. I do charge interest, but ~50% per week is exorbitant. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 19:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p8umdbhfrdeptg52pbqoq266ehep12bmao@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2070542 |
On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 23:04:51 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
wrote:
>On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:39:18 -0500, Don Martin wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they
>>>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to
>>>> type needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply
>>>> to a thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter
>>>> or mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues.
>>>
>>>The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god
>>>character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. Until you
>>>supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. Beliefs, opinions and
>>>'holy' books are NOT evidence.
>>>
>>>That reminds me: Where is my £60 million?
>>
>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go
>> the whole hog, go posh and do guineas?
>
>Ooops! Typo.
>I do charge interest, but ~50% per week is exorbitant.
Hey, it's _your_ fervent belief: go for it!
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 18:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbhs8d$qon$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2070600 |
On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 19:31:54 -0500, Don Martin wrote: > On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 23:04:51 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > >>On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:39:18 -0500, Don Martin wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they >>>>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to >>>>> type needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply >>>>> to a thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not >>>>> matter or mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues. >>>> >>>>The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god >>>>character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. Until >>>>you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. Beliefs, >>>>opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>>> >>>>That reminds me: Where is my £60 million? >>> >>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go >>> the whole hog, go posh and do guineas? >> >>Ooops! Typo. >>I do charge interest, but ~50% per week is exorbitant. > > Hey, it's _your_ fervent belief: go for it! Not only is it my fervent belief but, according to him, it's evidence. I wonder how a court of law would view that claim. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 15:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ec3pdb5v94cm6deua1upkopvgnkaed3cns@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2070857 |
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:17:49 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
wrote:
>On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 19:31:54 -0500, Don Martin wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 23:04:51 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:39:18 -0500, Don Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they
>>>>>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to
>>>>>> type needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply
>>>>>> to a thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not
>>>>>> matter or mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues.
>>>>>
>>>>>The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god
>>>>>character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. Until
>>>>>you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. Beliefs,
>>>>>opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence.
>>>>>
>>>>>That reminds me: Where is my £60 million?
>>>>
>>>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go
>>>> the whole hog, go posh and do guineas?
>>>
>>>Ooops! Typo.
>>>I do charge interest, but ~50% per week is exorbitant.
>>
>> Hey, it's _your_ fervent belief: go for it!
>
>Not only is it my fervent belief but, according to him, it's evidence.
>I wonder how a court of law would view that claim.
Better to send your enforcer, Guido, to collect before relying on
those stuffy courts.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 04:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1bbndbti5fu76u7jpon5fjl993oqkg3jc9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2070514 |
On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:39:18 -0500, Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote: >On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >wrote: > >>On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote: >> >>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: >>> >>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they >>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to type >>> needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply to a >>> thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter or >>> mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues. >> >>The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god >>character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. >>Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. >>Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >> >>That reminds me: Where is my £60 million? > >I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go >the whole hog, go posh and do guineas? We stopped doing those when we went Decimal and I was glad we did. I think they may still do it in the horse racing world though Les Hellawell Grreting from YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County Martin Luther wrote:: "Faith must trample underfoot all sense, reason and understanding Which means that if Luther practised what he preached nothing he ever said made any sense
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 09:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dk2cf1Fgt6oU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2070514 |
On 05/03/2016 21:39, Don Martin wrote: > On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > >> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote: >> >>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: >>> >>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they >>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to type >>> needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply to a >>> thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter or >>> mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues. >> >> The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god >> character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. >> Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. >> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >> >> That reminds me: Where is my £60 million? > > I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go > the whole hog, go posh and do guineas? > That's considered racist these days.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 10:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rmeodb1545od3etpfboh9jp83v4d6dgrb7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2070739 |
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 09:44:00 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>On 05/03/2016 21:39, Don Martin wrote:
>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they
>>>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to type
>>>> needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply to a
>>>> thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter or
>>>> mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues.
>>>
>>> The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god
>>> character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply.
>>> Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar.
>>> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence.
>>>
>>> That reminds me: Where is my £60 million?
>>
>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go
>> the whole hog, go posh and do guineas?
>
>That's considered racist these days.
Certainly so, if you make change in wogs.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 16:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dk3453Fn42nU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2070799 |
On 06/03/2016 15:26, Don Martin wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 09:44:00 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > >> On 05/03/2016 21:39, Don Martin wrote: >>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they >>>>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to type >>>>> needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply to a >>>>> thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter or >>>>> mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues. >>>> >>>> The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god >>>> character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. >>>> Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. >>>> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>>> >>>> That reminds me: Where is my £60 million? >>> >>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go >>> the whole hog, go posh and do guineas? >> >> That's considered racist these days. > > Certainly so, if you make change in wogs. > Ah, the dull chink of debased currency....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 15:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ta3pdb1ukcdt2qq57s6c5gs2sqiep6tmnv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2070822 |
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:28:18 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>On 06/03/2016 15:26, Don Martin wrote:
>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 09:44:00 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/03/2016 21:39, Don Martin wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they
>>>>>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to type
>>>>>> needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply to a
>>>>>> thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter or
>>>>>> mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god
>>>>> character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply.
>>>>> Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar.
>>>>> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence.
>>>>>
>>>>> That reminds me: Where is my £60 million?
>>>>
>>>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go
>>>> the whole hog, go posh and do guineas?
>>>
>>> That's considered racist these days.
>>
>> Certainly so, if you make change in wogs.
>
>Ah, the dull chink of debased currency....
I do not give a Sioux for your puns.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 14:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dk5fsaFb4rsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2070908 |
On 06/03/2016 20:15, Don Martin wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:28:18 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > >> On 06/03/2016 15:26, Don Martin wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 09:44:00 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 05/03/2016 21:39, Don Martin wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they >>>>>>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to type >>>>>>> needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply to a >>>>>>> thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter or >>>>>>> mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues. >>>>>> >>>>>> The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god >>>>>> character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. >>>>>> Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. >>>>>> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>> That reminds me: Where is my £60 million? >>>>> >>>>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go >>>>> the whole hog, go posh and do guineas? >>>> >>>> That's considered racist these days. >>> >>> Certainly so, if you make change in wogs. >> >> Ah, the dull chink of debased currency.... > > I do not give a Sioux for your puns. > Have you no cents of shame?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 19:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbklhm$ce4$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2071175 |
On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:00:42 +0000, Alex W. wrote: > On 06/03/2016 20:15, Don Martin wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:28:18 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> On 06/03/2016 15:26, Don Martin wrote: >>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 09:44:00 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 05/03/2016 21:39, Don Martin wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if >>>>>>>> they make more posts than the other person they win somehow, >>>>>>>> continue to type needlessly, as they think it means something if >>>>>>>> you don't reply to a thread anymore and respond to their nonsense >>>>>>>> that does not matter or mean anything to the core relevant issue >>>>>>>> or issues. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god >>>>>>> character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. >>>>>>> Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. >>>>>>> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That reminds me: Where is my £60 million? >>>>>> >>>>>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not >>>>>> go the whole hog, go posh and do guineas? >>>>> >>>>> That's considered racist these days. >>>> >>>> Certainly so, if you make change in wogs. >>> >>> Ah, the dull chink of debased currency.... >> >> I do not give a Sioux for your puns. >> > Have you no cents of shame? No cents, but does have a yen for some. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 18:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kq2sdb9mcdjithmsfong3cmv6ns7vb1t4v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2071267 |
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:41:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
wrote:
>On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:00:42 +0000, Alex W. wrote:
>
>> On 06/03/2016 20:15, Don Martin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:28:18 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06/03/2016 15:26, Don Martin wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 09:44:00 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/03/2016 21:39, Don Martin wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if
>>>>>>>>> they make more posts than the other person they win somehow,
>>>>>>>>> continue to type needlessly, as they think it means something if
>>>>>>>>> you don't reply to a thread anymore and respond to their nonsense
>>>>>>>>> that does not matter or mean anything to the core relevant issue
>>>>>>>>> or issues.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god
>>>>>>>> character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply.
>>>>>>>> Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar.
>>>>>>>> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That reminds me: Where is my £60 million?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not
>>>>>>> go the whole hog, go posh and do guineas?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's considered racist these days.
>>>>>
>>>>> Certainly so, if you make change in wogs.
>>>>
>>>> Ah, the dull chink of debased currency....
>>>
>>> I do not give a Sioux for your puns.
>>>
>> Have you no cents of shame?
>
>No cents, but does have a yen for some.
So does that make me a drachma queen?
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 07:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0atsdbpkhqq59rinfhl7lhqlrg7vriftu6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2071347 |
On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 18:30:27 -0500, Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote: >On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:41:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >wrote: > >>On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:00:42 +0000, Alex W. wrote: >> >>> On 06/03/2016 20:15, Don Martin wrote: >>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:28:18 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 06/03/2016 15:26, Don Martin wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 09:44:00 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 05/03/2016 21:39, Don Martin wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if >>>>>>>>>> they make more posts than the other person they win somehow, >>>>>>>>>> continue to type needlessly, as they think it means something if >>>>>>>>>> you don't reply to a thread anymore and respond to their nonsense >>>>>>>>>> that does not matter or mean anything to the core relevant issue >>>>>>>>>> or issues. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god >>>>>>>>> character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. >>>>>>>>> Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. >>>>>>>>> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That reminds me: Where is my £60 million? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not >>>>>>>> go the whole hog, go posh and do guineas? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's considered racist these days. >>>>>> >>>>>> Certainly so, if you make change in wogs. >>>>> >>>>> Ah, the dull chink of debased currency.... >>>> >>>> I do not give a Sioux for your puns. >>>> >>> Have you no cents of shame? >> >>No cents, but does have a yen for some. > >So does that make me a drachma queen? Yep, it entitles you to half-a-crown. Well, either that or not even a brass Farthing. Personally I could not care Tuppence either way to be quite Franc Les Hellawell Grreting from YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County Martin Luther wrote:: "Faith must trample underfoot all sense, reason and understanding Which means that if Luther practised what he preached nothing he ever said made any sense
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 08:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dk7hk2FraomU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2071438 |
On 08/03/2016 07:08, Les Hellawell wrote: > On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 18:30:27 -0500, Don Martin > <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:41:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:00:42 +0000, Alex W. wrote: >>> >>>> On 06/03/2016 20:15, Don Martin wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:28:18 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 06/03/2016 15:26, Don Martin wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 09:44:00 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 05/03/2016 21:39, Don Martin wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if >>>>>>>>>>> they make more posts than the other person they win somehow, >>>>>>>>>>> continue to type needlessly, as they think it means something if >>>>>>>>>>> you don't reply to a thread anymore and respond to their nonsense >>>>>>>>>>> that does not matter or mean anything to the core relevant issue >>>>>>>>>>> or issues. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god >>>>>>>>>> character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. >>>>>>>>>> Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. >>>>>>>>>> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That reminds me: Where is my £60 million? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not >>>>>>>>> go the whole hog, go posh and do guineas? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's considered racist these days. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Certainly so, if you make change in wogs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ah, the dull chink of debased currency.... >>>>> >>>>> I do not give a Sioux for your puns. >>>>> >>>> Have you no cents of shame? >>> >>> No cents, but does have a yen for some. >> >> So does that make me a drachma queen? > > Yep, it entitles you to half-a-crown. Well, either > that or not even a brass Farthing. Personally I could > not care Tuppence either way to be quite Franc "It's not polite to groat", as they say on Japanese Usenet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 23:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nboaen$qbv$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2071466 |
Le 2016-03-08 03:42, Alex W. a écrit : > On 08/03/2016 07:08, Les Hellawell wrote: >> On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 18:30:27 -0500, Don Martin >> <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:41:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:00:42 +0000, Alex W. wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 06/03/2016 20:15, Don Martin wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:28:18 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/03/2016 15:26, Don Martin wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 09:44:00 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 05/03/2016 21:39, Don Martin wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if >>>>>>>>>>>> they make more posts than the other person they win somehow, >>>>>>>>>>>> continue to type needlessly, as they think it means >>>>>>>>>>>> something if >>>>>>>>>>>> you don't reply to a thread anymore and respond to their >>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense >>>>>>>>>>>> that does not matter or mean anything to the core relevant >>>>>>>>>>>> issue >>>>>>>>>>>> or issues. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed >>>>>>>>>>> god >>>>>>>>>>> character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply. >>>>>>>>>>> Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar. >>>>>>>>>>> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That reminds me: Where is my £60 million? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why >>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>> go the whole hog, go posh and do guineas? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's considered racist these days. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Certainly so, if you make change in wogs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ah, the dull chink of debased currency.... >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not give a Sioux for your puns. >>>>>> >>>>> Have you no cents of shame? >>>> >>>> No cents, but does have a yen for some. >>> >>> So does that make me a drachma queen? >> >> Yep, it entitles you to half-a-crown. Well, either >> that or not even a brass Farthing. Personally I could >> not care Tuppence either way to be quite Franc > > "It's not polite to groat", as they say on Japanese Usenet. That's lacist! -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 18:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <co2sdb55filkmd4aaqqdp52fte7omakpkj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2071175 |
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:00:42 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>On 06/03/2016 20:15, Don Martin wrote:
>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:28:18 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/03/2016 15:26, Don Martin wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 09:44:00 +0000, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 05/03/2016 21:39, Don Martin wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 11:29:23 -0800, Prince Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:25:00 AM UTC-8, Syd M. wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The trolls here, since they are post count trolls, who think if they
>>>>>>>> make more posts than the other person they win somehow, continue to type
>>>>>>>> needlessly, as they think it means something if you don't reply to a
>>>>>>>> thread anymore and respond to their nonsense that does not matter or
>>>>>>>> mean anything to the core relevant issue or issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The relevant issue is the supposed evidence for your supposed god
>>>>>>> character which you claim to have, but have failed to supply.
>>>>>>> Until you supply this supposed evidence, you remain a liar.
>>>>>>> Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That reminds me: Where is my £60 million?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought that was dollars, but if you're upping the ante, why not go
>>>>>> the whole hog, go posh and do guineas?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's considered racist these days.
>>>>
>>>> Certainly so, if you make change in wogs.
>>>
>>> Ah, the dull chink of debased currency....
>>
>> I do not give a Sioux for your puns.
>
>Have you no cents of shame?
He says new-pensively.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web