Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2064901 > unrolled thread

Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love

Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love mur@. - 2016-02-23 21:39 -0500
    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-24 17:00 +0000
      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-24 11:12 -0600
      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-02-24 15:10 -0800
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-25 21:01 +0000
          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-28 16:01 +0000
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love mur@. - 2016-02-25 23:00 -0500
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-02-28 08:56 +1100
          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-27 23:00 +0000
            Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-27 17:13 -0600
            Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love mur@. - 2016-02-27 23:38 -0500
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-02-28 17:19 +1100
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-28 19:11 +0000
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love mur@. - 2016-02-28 22:42 -0500
                  Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-02-28 21:33 -0700
                    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Robert Duncan <rob-duncan32@outlook.com> - 2016-02-28 23:56 -0500
                    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love mur@. - 2016-02-29 21:57 -0500
                      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-01 06:16 +0000
                      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2016-03-01 22:04 +1100
                        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love mur@. - 2016-03-01 21:28 -0500
                          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-02 05:41 +0000
                            Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love mur@. - 2016-03-02 22:31 -0500
                              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-03 17:50 +0000
                                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love mur@. - 2016-03-03 21:25 -0500
                      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Leonard Leonard <l.a.radio@kfi.con> - 2016-03-01 06:57 -0800
                  Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-29 22:58 +0000
                    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2016-03-01 10:54 -0700
                      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-01 20:21 +0000
          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-02-27 19:13 -0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#2064901 — Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love

On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:

>On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>
>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
>> by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
>> challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
>> cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
>> defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
>> ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
>> people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
>> hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
>> and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
>> what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
>> into consideration.
>
>You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?

    Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten as much as he
wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the leftovers to
eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as I wanted of the same
stupid things over and over and over again. The lies, the insults, the lies, the
inability to support the stupid atheist position, the lies...and that's pretty
much all there is here or in the pussy group I mentioned. Unlike in the pussy
group though you cowards can't chickenstittedly ban a person for pointing out
how stupd and closed minded you are, challenging your tiny little mental safety
zone.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2065106

On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>
>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum,
>>> run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
>>> challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
>>> cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
>>> defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
>>> ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
>>> people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
>>> hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
>>> and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
>>> what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
>>> into consideration.
>>
>>You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
> 
>     Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten as
>     much as he
> wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
> leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as I
> wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again. The lies,
> the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
> position, the lies...and that's pretty much all there is here or in the
> pussy group I mentioned. Unlike in the pussy group though you cowards
> can't chickenstittedly ban a person for pointing out how stupd and
> closed minded you are, challenging your tiny little mental safety zone.

Still no evidence, so you're still running away.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2065115

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:00:37 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>> 
>>>On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>
>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum,
>>>> run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
>>>> challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
>>>> cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
>>>> defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
>>>> ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
>>>> people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
>>>> hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
>>>> and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
>>>> what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
>>>> into consideration.
>>>
>>>You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
>> 
>>     Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten as
>>     much as he
>> wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
>> leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as I
>> wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again. The lies,
>> the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
>> position, the lies

Unsolicited lies are all this pathological liar has.

What is he pretending is stupid about atheism?

All it means, is that we don't believe in any of the hundreds or even
thousands of gods humans have believed it - of which his is not
substantively different from the others.

When one has no reason to believe something, then one doesn't - no
matter how many stupid theists imagine everybody else should believe
in their particular one.

If he and his fellow brainwashed morons kept their nonsense where it
belongs, there wouldn't be the reaction they pretend is unprovoked and
unjustified.

But in their minds, it's OK for them to be in-your-face, rudely stupid
and we have to put up with it.

>                                ...and that's pretty much all there is here or in the
>> pussy group I mentioned. Unlike in the pussy group though you cowards
>> can't chickenstittedly ban a person for pointing out how stupd and
>> closed minded you are, challenging your tiny little mental safety zone.

When has the pathological liar ever challenged anything?

All he has to do is demonstrate his god is factual and his scriptures
are an accurate history.

But he can't, because they have no connection to reality.

>Still no evidence, so you're still running away.

Pretty well all his nastiness reflects himself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2065300

In article <naknjk$1o1m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> 
wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
> > 
> >>On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
> >>
> >>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum,
> >>> run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
> >>> challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
> >>> cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
> >>> defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
> >>> ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
> >>> people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
> >>> hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
> >>> and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
> >>> what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
> >>> into consideration.
> >>
> >>You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
> > 
> >     Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten as
> >     much as he
> > wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
> > leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as I
> > wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again. The lies,
> > the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
> > position, 

What "atheist position" are you talking about?

-- 

JD

"If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to 
your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake 
the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2065820

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:10:06 -0800, Jeanne Douglas wrote:

> In article <naknjk$1o1m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
>> 
>> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>> > 
>> >>On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy
>> >>> forum, run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes
>> >>> everything that challenges strong atheism and bans peope who
>> >>> challenge what little his cowardly brain is able to take into
>> >>> consideration. The challenge I defeated all you people with
>> >>> defeated him and all his fellow pussies ENTIRELY, just as it did
>> >>> all of you atheists in these forums. So you people would probably
>> >>> love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly hide in your tiny
>> >>> little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied and picked on
>> >>> by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond what your
>> >>> horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take into
>> >>> consideration.
>> >>
>> >>You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
>> > 
>> >     Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten as
>> >     much as he
>> > wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
>> > leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as I
>> > wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again. The
>> > lies,
>> > the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
>> > position,
> 
> What "atheist position" are you talking about?

Similar to the missionary position, but without the "Oh God!" at the end.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2067396

Smiler wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:10:06 -0800, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> 
> > In article <naknjk$1o1m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >>On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy
> >> >>> forum, run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes
> >> >>> everything that challenges strong atheism and bans peope who
> >> >>> challenge what little his cowardly brain is able to take into
> >> >>> consideration. The challenge I defeated all you people with
> >> >>> defeated him and all his fellow pussies ENTIRELY, just as it
> did >> >>> all of you atheists in these forums. So you people would
> probably >> >>> love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly hide
> in your tiny >> >>> little mental safety zone, instead of being
> bullied and picked on >> >>> by a very few people who challenge you
> to think beyond what your >> >>> horribly restricted little minds are
> mentally able to take into >> >>> consideration.
> >> >>
> >> >>You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
> >> > 
> >> >     Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's
> eaten as >> >     much as he
> >> > wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves
> the >> > leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as
> much as I >> > wanted of the same stupid things over and over and
> over again. The >> > lies,
> >> > the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid
> atheist >> > position,
> > 
> > What "atheist position" are you talking about?
> 
> Similar to the missionary position, but without the "Oh God!" at the
> end.

LOL! :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2066106

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:10:06 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <naknjk$1o1m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> 
>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
>> 
>> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>> > 
>> >>On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum,
>> >>> run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
>> >>> challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
>> >>> cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
>> >>> defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
>> >>> ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
>> >>> people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
>> >>> hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
>> >>> and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
>> >>> what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
>> >>> into consideration.
>> >>
>> >>You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
>> > 
>> >     Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten as
>> >     much as he
>> > wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
>> > leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as I
>> > wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again. The lies,
>> > the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
>> > position, 
>
>What "atheist position" are you talking about?

    There are at least two. Have you learned what either of them are yet? Here's
a clue for you in case you ever want to try to learn: 

stong atheism
weak atheism

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2067059

On 25-February-2016 10:10 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> In article <naknjk$1o1m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum,
>>>>> run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
>>>>> challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
>>>>> cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
>>>>> defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
>>>>> ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
>>>>> people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
>>>>> hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
>>>>> and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
>>>>> what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
>>>>> into consideration.
>>>> You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
>>>      Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten as
>>>      much as he
>>> wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
>>> leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as I
>>> wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again. The lies,
>>> the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
>>> position,
> What "atheist position" are you talking about?
>

'no god(s)'. duh!

-- 
"As long as there is this book [Koran] there will be no peace in the world"
-William Gladstone, four times PM of Great Britain
http://www.siotw.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2067085

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:56:19 +1100, felix wrote:

> On 25-February-2016 10:10 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>> In article <naknjk$1o1m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy
>>>>>> forum, run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes
>>>>>> everything that challenges strong atheism and bans peope who
>>>>>> challenge what little his cowardly brain is able to take into
>>>>>> consideration. The challenge I defeated all you people with
>>>>>> defeated him and all his fellow pussies ENTIRELY, just as it did
>>>>>> all of you atheists in these forums. So you people would probably
>>>>>> love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly hide in your tiny
>>>>>> little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied and picked on
>>>>>> by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond what your
>>>>>> horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take into
>>>>>> consideration.
>>>>> You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
>>>>      Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten
>>>>      as much as he
>>>> wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
>>>> leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as I
>>>> wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again. The
>>>> lies,
>>>> the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
>>>> position,
>> What "atheist position" are you talking about?
>>
>>
> 'no god(s)'. duh!

I'm an atheist and that's not my position.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2067090

On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 23:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
wrote:

>On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:56:19 +1100, felix wrote:
>
>> On 25-February-2016 10:10 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>>> In article <naknjk$1o1m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy
>>>>>>> forum, run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes
>>>>>>> everything that challenges strong atheism and bans peope who
>>>>>>> challenge what little his cowardly brain is able to take into
>>>>>>> consideration. The challenge I defeated all you people with
>>>>>>> defeated him and all his fellow pussies ENTIRELY, just as it did
>>>>>>> all of you atheists in these forums. So you people would probably
>>>>>>> love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly hide in your tiny
>>>>>>> little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied and picked on
>>>>>>> by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond what your
>>>>>>> horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take into
>>>>>>> consideration.
>>>>>> You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
>>>>>      Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten
>>>>>      as much as he
>>>>> wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
>>>>> leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as I
>>>>> wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again. The
>>>>> lies,
>>>>> the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
>>>>> position,
>>> What "atheist position" are you talking about?
>>>
>>>
>> 'no god(s)'. duh!
>
>I'm an atheist and that's not my position.

I just wish theists had the intelligence to think outside the box,
where we are and where the assumptions they use to invent positions we
don't have, don't even apply.

And these assumptions include their god.

Outside the box, it is merely one of hundreds of different deity
beliefs - and somebody else's which we don't share, at that.

As such, it is irrelevant and unimportant to everybody but its
believers.

We wouldn't even give a thought to it, if theists kept it inside their
pants^H^H^H^H^Hreligion.

But they can't live and let live.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2067274

On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 23:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:

>On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:56:19 +1100, felix wrote:
>
>> On 25-February-2016 10:10 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>>> In article <naknjk$1o1m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smil
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy
>>>>>>> forum, run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes
>>>>>>> everything that challenges strong atheism and bans peope who
>>>>>>> challenge what little his cowardly brain is able to take into
>>>>>>> consideration. The challenge I defeated all you people with
>>>>>>> defeated him and all his fellow pussies ENTIRELY, just as it did
>>>>>>> all of you atheists in these forums. So you people would probably
>>>>>>> love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly hide in your tiny
>>>>>>> little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied and picked on
>>>>>>> by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond what your
>>>>>>> horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take into
>>>>>>> consideration.
>>>>>> You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
>>>>>      Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten
>>>>>      as much as he
>>>>> wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
>>>>> leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as I
>>>>> wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again. The
>>>>> lies,
>>>>> the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
>>>>> position,
>>> What "atheist position" are you talking about?
>>>
>>>
>> 'no god(s)'. duh!
>
>I'm an atheist and that's not my position.

>Smiler, The godless one.

    LOL! HILARIOUS!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2067291

On 28-February-2016 3:38 PM, mur@. wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 23:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:56:19 +1100, felix wrote:
>>
>>> On 25-February-2016 10:10 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>>>> In article <naknjk$1o1m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smil
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy
>>>>>>>> forum, run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes
>>>>>>>> everything that challenges strong atheism and bans peope who
>>>>>>>> challenge what little his cowardly brain is able to take into
>>>>>>>> consideration. The challenge I defeated all you people with
>>>>>>>> defeated him and all his fellow pussies ENTIRELY, just as it did
>>>>>>>> all of you atheists in these forums. So you people would probably
>>>>>>>> love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly hide in your tiny
>>>>>>>> little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied and picked on
>>>>>>>> by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond what your
>>>>>>>> horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take into
>>>>>>>> consideration.
>>>>>>> You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
>>>>>>       Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten
>>>>>>       as much as he
>>>>>> wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
>>>>>> leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as I
>>>>>> wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again. The
>>>>>> lies,
>>>>>> the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
>>>>>> position,
>>>> What "atheist position" are you talking about?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 'no god(s)'. duh!
>> I'm an atheist and that's not my position.
>> Smiler, The godless one.
>      LOL! HILARIOUS!!!

LOL!!

-- 
"As long as there is this book [Koran] there will be no peace in the world"
-William Gladstone, four times PM of Great Britain
http://www.siotw.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2067479

On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 23:38:00 -0500, mur wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 23:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
> 
>>On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:56:19 +1100, felix wrote:
>>
>>> On 25-February-2016 10:10 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>>>> In article <naknjk$1o1m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smil wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy
>>>>>>>> forum, run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes
>>>>>>>> everything that challenges strong atheism and bans peope who
>>>>>>>> challenge what little his cowardly brain is able to take into
>>>>>>>> consideration. The challenge I defeated all you people with
>>>>>>>> defeated him and all his fellow pussies ENTIRELY, just as it did
>>>>>>>> all of you atheists in these forums. So you people would probably
>>>>>>>> love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly hide in your tiny
>>>>>>>> little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied and picked on
>>>>>>>> by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond what your
>>>>>>>> horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take into
>>>>>>>> consideration.
>>>>>>> You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
>>>>>>      Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten
>>>>>>      as much as he
>>>>>> wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
>>>>>> leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as
>>>>>> I wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again.
>>>>>> The lies,
>>>>>> the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
>>>>>> position,
>>>> What "atheist position" are you talking about?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 'no god(s)'. duh!
>>
>>I'm an atheist and that's not my position.
> 
>>Smiler, The godless one.
> 
>     LOL! HILARIOUS!!!

Godless, in that I don't have one, not that there aren't any.
Or does homeless mean that there are no homes in your world?
But we know that you are senseless.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2067652

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:11:39 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:

>On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 23:38:00 -0500, mur wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 23:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>> 
>>>On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:56:19 +1100, felix wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25-February-2016 10:10 AM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>>>>> In article <naknjk$1o1m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smil wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:39:54 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy
>>>>>>>>> forum, run by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes
>>>>>>>>> everything that challenges strong atheism and bans peope who
>>>>>>>>> challenge what little his cowardly brain is able to take into
>>>>>>>>> consideration. The challenge I defeated all you people with
>>>>>>>>> defeated him and all his fellow pussies ENTIRELY, just as it did
>>>>>>>>> all of you atheists in these forums. So you people would probably
>>>>>>>>> love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly hide in your tiny
>>>>>>>>> little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied and picked on
>>>>>>>>> by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond what your
>>>>>>>>> horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take into
>>>>>>>>> consideration.
>>>>>>>> You've claimed 'Victolly'. Are you going to run away now?
>>>>>>>      Like a person "runs away" from a plate of food when he's eaten
>>>>>>>      as much as he
>>>>>>> wants of it. Sometimes the person "runs away" from it but saves the
>>>>>>> leftovers to eat later. In the case here I certainly got as much as
>>>>>>> I wanted of the same stupid things over and over and over again.
>>>>>>> The lies,
>>>>>>> the insults, the lies, the inability to support the stupid atheist
>>>>>>> position,
>>>>> What "atheist position" are you talking about?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> 'no god(s)'. duh!
>>>
>>>I'm an atheist and that's not my position.
>> 
>>>Smiler, The godless one.
>> 
>>     LOL! HILARIOUS!!!
>
>Godless, in that I don't have one, 

    How would you like people to think you yourself could have one?

>not that there aren't any.

    How would you like people to think that if there are any, you could prevent
any from having you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2067677

The trouble with those people who claim to have their own gods is than 
no two of those people ever seem to claim quite the same  god as anyone 
else claims!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2067687

On 2/28/2016 11:33 PM, Wisely Non-Theist wrote:
> The trouble with those people who claim to have their own gods is than 
> no two of those people ever seem to claim quite the same  god as anyone 
> else claims!
> 

Why should that even bother you, someone who supposedly claims they do
not believe that any gods exist?

For me, that makes absolutely no sense at all.

It's like you don't know what you don't believe.

It's like you're more agnostic than you are atheist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2068080

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 21:33:41 -0700, Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> wrote:

>The trouble with those people who claim to have their own gods is than 
>no two of those people ever seem to claim quite the same  god as anyone 
>else claims!

2. If there is a creator associated with this planet, all 
who refer to him refer to the same being regardless of what 
they call him or what they think about him. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2068113

<mur@.> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 21:33:41 -0700, Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> wrote:
> 
>> The trouble with those people who claim to have their own gods is than 
>> no two of those people ever seem to claim quite the same  god as anyone 
>> else claims!
> 
> 2. If there is a creator associated with this planet, all 
> who refer to him refer to the same being regardless of what 
> they call him or what they think about him. 
> 

Assertion without evidence. See the Post hoc fallacy.


-- 
Yep it is me, and Carole believes  adding 2+2 can sometimes equal 3 or 5,
and getting wrong answers means you are thinking outside the box.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2068170

On 01-March-2016 1:57 PM, mur@. wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 21:33:41 -0700, Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> wrote:
>
>> The trouble with those people who claim to have their own gods is than
>> no two of those people ever seem to claim quite the same  god as anyone
>> else claims!
> 2. If there is a creator associated with this planet, all
> who refer to him refer to the same being regardless of what
> they call him or what they think about him.

what was number 1? is there a number 3? 4,5,6, etc.,

-- 
"As long as there is this book [Koran] there will be no peace in the world"
-William Gladstone, four times PM of Great Britain
http://www.siotw.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2068616

On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 22:04:29 +1100, felix <me@nothere.invalid> wrote:

>On 01-March-2016 1:57 PM, mur@. wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 21:33:41 -0700, Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> wrote:
>>
>>> The trouble with those people who claim to have their own gods is than
>>> no two of those people ever seem to claim quite the same  god as anyone
>>> else claims!
>> 2. If there is a creator associated with this planet, all
>> who refer to him refer to the same being regardless of what
>> they call him or what they think about him.
>
>what was number 1? is there a number 3? 4,5,6, etc.,

1. If God exists he almost certainly would have to be an alien.

2. If there is a creator associated with this planet, all 
who refer to him refer to the same being regardless of what 
they call him or what they think about him. 

3. Nothing that happens is supernatural, so anything gods do 
would be natural for them.

4. If God exists and wants things to be as they are, he
could not provide proof of his existence because doing
so would change things too much.

5. Since the terms omnipotent and omniscient appear to
make themselves impossible, it's unrealistic to try assigning
those particular characteristics to God if he exists.

6. Since disbelief is a form of belief, the degree of faith a 
person has that God does not exist is what determines how 
strong an atheist he or she is, or is not.

7. People who have put their faith in a belief often/usually find
it impossible to comprehend the ability of considering the possibility
that God does not exist and also the possibility that he does.

8. People who have put their faith in a belief often/usually find
it impossible to comprehend much less appreciate basic number 2.

9. People who claim to be strong atheists often/usually try to 
deny their own faith that God does not exist...faith which is a 
necessary part of being a strong atheist.

10. Whether God exists or not it seems apparent that life must have
originated from lifelessness to begin with, and may do it fairly often.

11. We should not allow what appear to be conflicting or unlikely 
beliefs encouraged by other people--however absurd--to contaminate 
and interfere with our own attempts to think about this topic 
realistically.

12. We should not allow childlike and unrealistic attempts at comparing
the concept of gods with those of childlike ideas like the tooth fairy,
the Easter Bunny, invisible pink unicorns, spaghetti monsters etc 
encouraged by other people--however absurd--to contaminate and interfere 
with our own attempts to think about this topic realistically.

13. If gods exist they would necessarily have to be technologically 
advanced far beyond we humans on Earth, to the point that they became 
gods.

14. If God exists he almost certainly would not be restricted to any
particular body, form, or gender. (disclaimer: I refer to God as "he" out
of convenience and because that's how we are encouraged to refer to "him" 
in most if not all canonical texts.)

15. If God exists it seems most likely that he has as much influence
over the content of canonical texts as he wants to have.

16. If God exists, it seems quite clear he makes use of the evolutionary
method of creation.

17. If there are things which people consider to be spiritual, they are 
most likely actually physical in ways we just can't appreciate yet.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism

csiph-web