Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #1951000 > unrolled thread
| Started by | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-10 05:23 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 117 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-02 08:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 18:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-02 14:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-08-02 15:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-08-02 14:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-03 03:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-03 18:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-04 15:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-08-06 04:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-08-08 06:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-08 04:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 08:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 14:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-08 18:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-08 13:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-08 14:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-08 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 00:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-07 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-07 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-12 03:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-08-10 06:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:48 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 12:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-08 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-09 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-10 05:23 -0400
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. |
| Message-ID | <alqnrad16474iem2ht3610ard5kjcjhfrr@4ax.com> |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:00:35 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><8k1lrah60tmh9kmj4na39snnr6chnftc9l@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>That's the human animation given by God to his creation. Thus it takes a desire >>>>>>>>for to perform evil, a desire to listen to satan to turn to hate over love, >>>>>>>>wrong over right, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>>>I see opinion. No evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>>I see hard pressed ignorance and no desire to learn. >>>> >>>>>Still no evidence. >>>> >>>>Your funeral. >> >>>As I have told you several times I will not have one. >> >>You don't get a vote. > >I am the only one that does. You'll be dead - body wise. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0ibprahc4d1ldolt1k411s0ja959r30nep@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951000 |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <alqnrad16474iem2ht3610ard5kjcjhfrr@4ax.com> wrote: >On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:00:35 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><8k1lrah60tmh9kmj4na39snnr6chnftc9l@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>That's the human animation given by God to his creation. Thus it takes a desire >>>>>>>>>for to perform evil, a desire to listen to satan to turn to hate over love, >>>>>>>>>wrong over right, etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I see opinion. No evidence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I see hard pressed ignorance and no desire to learn. >>>>> >>>>>>Still no evidence. >>>>> >>>>>Your funeral. >>> >>>>As I have told you several times I will not have one. >>> >>>You don't get a vote. >> >>I am the only one that does. > >You'll be dead - body wise. > Yep, so I really won't care will I? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vlbsrah3mesudq0pip7pc4l2jf178ekhav@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951332 |
On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 07:32:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><alqnrad16474iem2ht3610ard5kjcjhfrr@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:00:35 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><8k1lrah60tmh9kmj4na39snnr6chnftc9l@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>That's the human animation given by God to his creation. Thus it takes a desire >>>>>>>>>>for to perform evil, a desire to listen to satan to turn to hate over love, >>>>>>>>>>wrong over right, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I see opinion. No evidence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I see hard pressed ignorance and no desire to learn. >>>>>> >>>>>>>Still no evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>>Your funeral. >>>> >>>>>As I have told you several times I will not have one. >>>> >>>>You don't get a vote. >>> >>>I am the only one that does. >> >>You'll be dead - body wise. >Yep, so I really won't care will I? God made arrangement for you in a physical body via conception, and infused a soul. You physical body dies, but the soul is indestructible. Does/can/will God reanimate your soul to experience final love or final fires. I can't answer that. However, in our example. Jesus did return in the flesh for 40 days after his cross. And it was described as a glorified body, implying a new body. I can't tell you how all this works and doesn't work. I can only relate to the way it was presented to us. And I accept what will come. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 11:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mplcp0$gnv$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1951801 |
On 8/2/2015 10:56 AM, duke wrote: > > God made arrangement for you in a physical body via conception, and infused a > soul. You physical body dies, but the soul is indestructible. Does/can/will > God reanimate your soul to experience final love or final fires. I can't answer > that. > > However, in our example. Jesus did return in the flesh for 40 days after his > cross. And it was described as a glorified body, implying a new body. Wrong again Dukie. According to your bible, Jesus showed Thomas the holes in his body where the Roman guard speared him. I'm sure Talishi can quote chapter and verse. I cbf -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 08:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mple9s02jjq@drn.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #1951827 |
In article <mplcp0$gnv$2@dont-email.me>, HVAC says... > >On 8/2/2015 10:56 AM, duke wrote: >> >> However, in our example. Jesus did return in the >> flesh for 40 days after his cross. And it was >> described as a glorified body, implying a new body. > > Wrong again Dukie. According to your bible, > Jesus showed Thomas the holes in his body > where the Roman guard speared him. > >I'm sure Talishi can quote chapter and verse. I cbf > John 20:27 Then saith he to Thomas, reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 12:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lelsra1rruvfbi1b5ubd07jmvpnr48usd3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951849 |
On 2 Aug 2015 08:51:24 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >In article <mplcp0$gnv$2@dont-email.me>, HVAC says... >> >>On 8/2/2015 10:56 AM, duke wrote: >>> >>> However, in our example. Jesus did return in the >>> flesh for 40 days after his cross. And it was >>> described as a glorified body, implying a new body. >> >> Wrong again Dukie. According to your bible, >> Jesus showed Thomas the holes in his body >> where the Roman guard speared him. >> >>I'm sure Talishi can quote chapter and verse. I cbf >> >John 20:27 Then saith he to Thomas, reach hither thy finger, >and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust >it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. for a second there I thought jesus was gonna say pull my finger :P
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k72tradv3c2g8maevqei67faclj12alj2r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951849 |
On 2 Aug 2015 08:51:24 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >In article <mplcp0$gnv$2@dont-email.me>, HVAC says... >> >>On 8/2/2015 10:56 AM, duke wrote: >>> >>> However, in our example. Jesus did return in the >>> flesh for 40 days after his cross. And it was >>> described as a glorified body, implying a new body. >> >> Wrong again Dukie. According to your bible, >> Jesus showed Thomas the holes in his body >> where the Roman guard speared him. >> >>I'm sure Talishi can quote chapter and verse. I cbf >> >John 20:27 Then saith he to Thomas, reach hither thy finger, >and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust >it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. Yep. So is he a ghost or flesh? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 18:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ji9tra16g8rg2uv3h4cr6trmdj6lvri4c2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951987 |
On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 16:18:04 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On 2 Aug 2015 08:51:24 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > >>In article <mplcp0$gnv$2@dont-email.me>, HVAC says... >>> >>>On 8/2/2015 10:56 AM, duke wrote: >>>> >>>> However, in our example. Jesus did return in the >>>> flesh for 40 days after his cross. And it was >>>> described as a glorified body, implying a new body. >>> >>> Wrong again Dukie. According to your bible, >>> Jesus showed Thomas the holes in his body >>> where the Roman guard speared him. >>> >>>I'm sure Talishi can quote chapter and verse. I cbf >>> >>John 20:27 Then saith he to Thomas, reach hither thy finger, >>and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust >>it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. > >Yep. So is he a ghost or flesh? LOL duke believes in ghosts > >the dukester, American-American > >***** >"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." >Pope Paul VI >*****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 16:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <062tra9ior09b0pg7nl293257257n74215@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951827 |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 11:27:06 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >On 8/2/2015 10:56 AM, duke wrote: >> >> God made arrangement for you in a physical body via conception, and infused a >> soul. You physical body dies, but the soul is indestructible. Does/can/will >> God reanimate your soul to experience final love or final fires. I can't answer >> that. >> >> However, in our example. Jesus did return in the flesh for 40 days after his >> cross. And it was described as a glorified body, implying a new body. >Wrong again Dukie. According to your bible, Jesus showed Thomas the >holes in his body where the Roman guard speared him. It was still a glorified resurrected body. >I'm sure Talishi can quote chapter and verse. I cbf the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dbesradlf19kthf35lul2f7bvbvfk424er@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951801 |
On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:56:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 07:32:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><alqnrad16474iem2ht3610ard5kjcjhfrr@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:00:35 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><8k1lrah60tmh9kmj4na39snnr6chnftc9l@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>That's the human animation given by God to his creation. Thus it takes a desire >>>>>>>>>>>for to perform evil, a desire to listen to satan to turn to hate over love, >>>>>>>>>>>wrong over right, etc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I see opinion. No evidence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I see hard pressed ignorance and no desire to learn. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Still no evidence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Your funeral. >>>>> >>>>>>As I have told you several times I will not have one. >>>>> >>>>>You don't get a vote. >>>> >>>>I am the only one that does. >>> >>>You'll be dead - body wise. > >>Yep, so I really won't care will I? > >God made arrangement for you in a physical body via conception, and infused a >soul. You physical body dies, but the soul is indestructible. Does/can/will >God reanimate your soul to experience final love or final fires. I can't answer >that. > >However, in our example. Jesus did return in the flesh for 40 days after his >cross. And it was described as a glorified body, implying a new body. ahh zombie jesus, I bet the first words he said was "brains" > >I can't tell you how all this works and doesn't work. I can only relate to the >way it was presented to us. And I accept what will come. > >the dukester, American-American > >***** >"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." >Pope Paul VI >*****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mple96$evl$1@panix2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #1951841 |
In article <dbesradlf19kthf35lul2f7bvbvfk424er@4ax.com>, bilgat@m.nu quoted a fool whom I have killfiled: > On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:56:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >> However, in our example. Jesus did return in the flesh for 40 >> days after his cross. And it was described as a glorified body, >> implying a new body. Wait though, didn't he still have a bunch of excess holes in him? (See "Doubting Thomas" at John 20:24-29.) -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mplevc$pc7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1951841 |
On 8/2/2015 11:39 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >> However, in our example. Jesus did return in the flesh for 40 days after his >> cross. And it was described as a glorified body, implying a new body. > > ahh zombie jesus, I bet the first words he said was "brains" Wait...Did you say BRAINS? "It's not a bad question Bert" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkhCAV3wmIU -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dcisra59pkv05foqrcdnb58bup9vk1dqsa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951841 |
On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 10:39:33 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:56:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 07:32:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><alqnrad16474iem2ht3610ard5kjcjhfrr@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:00:35 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><8k1lrah60tmh9kmj4na39snnr6chnftc9l@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>That's the human animation given by God to his creation. Thus it takes a desire >>>>>>>>>>>>for to perform evil, a desire to listen to satan to turn to hate over love, >>>>>>>>>>>>wrong over right, etc. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>I see opinion. No evidence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I see hard pressed ignorance and no desire to learn. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Still no evidence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Your funeral. >>>>>> >>>>>>>As I have told you several times I will not have one. >>>>>> >>>>>>You don't get a vote. >>>>> >>>>>I am the only one that does. >>>> >>>>You'll be dead - body wise. >> >>>Yep, so I really won't care will I? >> >>God WHAT FUCKING GOD? The psychopath knows we're not Christians, so he knows we don't believe that nonsense - and he knows we wouldn't even think about it let alone call it nonsense, if he had the commonsense and courtesy to keep it where it belongs. > made arrangement for you in a physical body via conception, and infused a >>soul. WHAT FUCKING SOUL? He might just well have said it infused a flurblesnod, because his religious view of "soul" is meaningless to the non-Christians he knows we are. >> You physical body dies, but the soul is indestructible. Where did the in-your-face moron demonstrate that any of his religious nonsense is true outside the virtual reality of his religion? >> Does/can/will >>God WHAT FUCKING GOD? >> reanimate your soul WHAT FUCKING SOUL? >> to experience final love When my father died, my mother was holding his hand. His final moments were looking into the eyes of the woman he'd loved most of his adult life. I think it's rather a nice way to go. It was hard for her, because they'd been married for more than fifty years - and that is why religion came up with the comforting lie all those centuries ago. >> or final fires. WHAT FUCKING FINAL FIRES? >> I can't answer >>that. Or pretty much anything else. >>However, in our example. Jesus WHAT FUCKING JESUS? And Santa Claus really does deliver toys by flying sleigh, from his magic factory at the North Pole. >> did return in the flesh for 40 days after his PROVE IT, OR KEEP YOUR STUPID BULLSHIT AND NONSENSE WHERE PEOPLE TAKE IT SERIOUSLY, psychopath. >>cross. And it was described as a glorified body, implying a new body. Was that meant to make any sense? >ahh zombie jesus, I bet the first words he said was "brains" He's seriously mentally ill. I wouldn't give a toss what he believes, but he has a psychological obsession with wiping it in the faces of people he knows don't share his religious beliefs, to the point of neverending religious harassment over a couple of decades. >>I can't tell you how all this works and doesn't work. I can only relate to the >>way it was presented to us. And I accept what will come. WHAT FUCKING "WHAT WILL COME"? If the moron thinks he will be doing any more than pushing up the daisies, let him prove it or shut the fuck up. >>the dukester, American-American The Pukester, in-your-face, psychopath, narcissist and retard who imagines live-and-let-live doesn't apply to him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 14:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mplpej$hb1$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1951923 |
> harassment over a couple of decades. > > >>> I can't tell you how all this works and doesn't work. I can only relate to the >>> way it was presented to us. And I accept what will come. > > WHAT FUCKING "WHAT WILL COME"? > > If the moron thinks he will be doing any more than pushing up the > daisies, let him prove it or shut the fuck up. > >>> the dukester, American-American > > The Pukester, in-your-face, psychopath, narcissist and retard who > imagines live-and-let-live doesn't apply to him. > May Jesus have mercy on your non-believing lost sole.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 15:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <20usrapqekla2ghbff4246eduhboarrjbs@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951966 |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 14:01:41 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> harassment over a couple of decades. >> >> >>>> I can't tell you how all this works and doesn't work. I can only relate to the >>>> way it was presented to us. And I accept what will come. >> >> WHAT FUCKING "WHAT WILL COME"? >> >> If the moron thinks he will be doing any more than pushing up the >> daisies, let him prove it or shut the fuck up. >> >>>> the dukester, American-American >> >> The Pukester, in-your-face, psychopath, narcissist and retard who >> imagines live-and-let-live doesn't apply to him. >> > >May Jesus What fucking Jesus? > have mercy on your non-believing lost sole. I know where my soles are, Zacky.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 16:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1u1tra1oleftcm671dhupoq5gbk5ehhkeb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951966 |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 14:01:41 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> harassment over a couple of decades. >> >> >>>> I can't tell you how all this works and doesn't work. I can only relate to the >>>> way it was presented to us. And I accept what will come. >> >> WHAT FUCKING "WHAT WILL COME"? >> >> If the moron thinks he will be doing any more than pushing up the >> daisies, let him prove it or shut the fuck up. >> >>>> the dukester, American-American >> >> The Pukester, in-your-face, psychopath, narcissist and retard who >> imagines live-and-let-live doesn't apply to him. >> > >May Jesus have mercy on your non-believing lost sole. I relly dont think the guy down at home depot would really care
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 15:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ffqsratv5jr28r8es6siirf6mckvsf0hd1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951966 |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 14:01:41 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
wrote:
>> harassment over a couple of decades.
>>
>>
>>>> I can't tell you how all this works and doesn't work. I can only relate to the
>>>> way it was presented to us. And I accept what will come.
>>
>> WHAT FUCKING "WHAT WILL COME"?
>>
>> If the moron thinks he will be doing any more than pushing up the
>> daisies, let him prove it or shut the fuck up.
>>
>>>> the dukester, American-American
>>
>> The Pukester, in-your-face, psychopath, narcissist and retard who
>> imagines live-and-let-live doesn't apply to him.
>>
>May Jesus have mercy on your non-believing lost sole.
Cobblers do more than Jesus can
To restore all lost soles unto man.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p82tradsdeefslbfbl4vh14shj2pv6giqu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951841 |
On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 10:39:33 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:56:43 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 07:32:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:38:19 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><alqnrad16474iem2ht3610ard5kjcjhfrr@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:00:35 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><8k1lrah60tmh9kmj4na39snnr6chnftc9l@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>That's the human animation given by God to his creation. Thus it takes a desire >>>>>>>>>>>>for to perform evil, a desire to listen to satan to turn to hate over love, >>>>>>>>>>>>wrong over right, etc. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>I see opinion. No evidence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I see hard pressed ignorance and no desire to learn. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Still no evidence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Your funeral. >>>>>> >>>>>>>As I have told you several times I will not have one. >>>>>> >>>>>>You don't get a vote. >>>>> >>>>>I am the only one that does. >>>> >>>>You'll be dead - body wise. >> >>>Yep, so I really won't care will I? >> >>God made arrangement for you in a physical body via conception, and infused a >>soul. You physical body dies, but the soul is indestructible. Does/can/will >>God reanimate your soul to experience final love or final fires. I can't answer >>that. >> >>However, in our example. Jesus did return in the flesh for 40 days after his >>cross. And it was described as a glorified body, implying a new body. > >ahh zombie jesus, I bet the first words he said was "brains" He wasn't ordering for you. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d26u2vF2binU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #1951801 |
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >However, in our example. Jesus did return in the flesh for 40 days after his >cross. And it was described as a glorified body, implying a new body. If it was a new body, how come it was recreated with the holes in the hands? -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 14:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <edmsrap3k5aoujhl4qr82vsvhm017lu4a6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1951874 |
On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 10:15:34 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote:
>duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>However, in our example. Jesus did return in the flesh for 40 days after his
>>cross. And it was described as a glorified body, implying a new body.
>
>If it was a new body, how come it was recreated with the holes in the
>hands?
To facilitate hanging out with his new buddies?
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web