Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #1930579 > unrolled thread
| Started by | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-23 17:13 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-06-26 17:37 -0500 |
| Articles | 18 on this page of 378 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-23 17:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-24 00:22 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-24 14:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-24 14:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-25 13:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-24 21:48 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-25 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-25 21:35 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-26 17:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-27 19:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-28 17:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-29 20:05 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-29 17:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-30 08:43 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-29 17:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-30 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-04 08:30 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-04 08:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-05 08:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 08:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 06:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 10:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 10:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 08:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 11:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 10:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 12:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 14:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 18:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 21:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 08:45 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-07-10 06:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:45 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 21:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-06 17:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:03 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 07:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 10:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:57 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 10:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 12:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 10:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-07 23:55 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-09 04:46 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-09 01:41 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-09 23:10 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:13 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:40 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-07 17:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 18:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 17:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:54 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:54 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 18:35 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 17:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:21 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-05 14:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-05 20:00 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-05 18:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 20:59 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-07 17:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 11:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 11:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 23:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 06:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 08:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 07:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 08:42 -0400
Re: "Believers" won't go to heaven. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 06:22 -0400
Re: "Believers" won't go to heaven. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 06:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 09:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:14 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 10:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 10:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 07:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:53 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.nut> - 2015-07-10 13:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 09:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-10 14:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 17:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 17:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 17:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 17:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 08:51 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 16:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 11:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 20:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 10:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 21:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 21:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 23:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:35 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 18:03 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-07 20:29 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 21:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 09:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 10:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 13:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 00:37 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 12:36 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 10:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 14:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 14:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 12:54 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 10:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 21:02 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-08 18:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:50 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-09 17:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 16:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 00:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 19:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 13:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:01 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 09:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-10 15:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:49 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 00:09 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-08 14:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:43 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-08 16:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:19 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:21 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-10 00:13 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 19:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 18:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 14:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 20:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 11:35 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 11:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 12:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 13:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 14:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 19:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:59 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 07:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 21:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 23:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-09 00:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:55 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-06 18:37 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 01:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:05 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:02 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 09:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 13:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 12:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 14:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 16:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:08 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:28 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-06 07:48 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 18:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 20:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 12:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 03:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 19:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 15:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 09:06 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 07:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-07 08:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:40 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 22:24 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 07:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:04 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 10:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 17:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:41 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 22:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.nut> - 2015-07-10 13:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 07:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:44 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 22:37 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:49 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:40 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-10 14:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-07 11:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-06 21:09 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 05:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 08:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 10:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-30 07:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-25 23:11 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-26 21:52 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-26 17:37 -0500
Page 19 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 16:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vf6rpa1ks2fq92i94g872tpohc9k4m5s75@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938817 |
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 22:37:09 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >news:q3inpalbn6556s4k9hjbk4goeea15gljn7@4ax.com... > >(butting in) > >> But it's your problem because it's you that keeps insulting God. > >We don't insult God. We do not believe there is a God. We're insulting you >for believing there is one. And then God will look at you and ask why you didn't see what everybody else sees. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 17:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mnkger02hpt@news4.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #1938873 |
duke wrote: > And then God will look at you and ask why you didn't see what everybody else > sees. And the reason is because we're not hitting the sacramental wine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 10:52 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <d06r2iFr88jU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #1938947 |
On 09/07/2015 03:49, talishi wrote: > duke wrote: >> And then God will look at you and ask why you didn't see what >> everybody else >> sees. > > And the reason is because we're not hitting the sacramental wine. .... or toking the burning incense....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 11:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <f89tpa12910ldthqceu06j4vg566i0h9tk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938947 |
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:49:00 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >duke wrote: >> And then God will look at you and ask why you didn't see what everybody else >> sees. > >And the reason is because we're not hitting the sacramental wine. No, you refuse to look. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 18:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mnn7rh0i4@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #1939283 |
duke wrote: > On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:49:00 -0800, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> >duke wrote: >>> >> And then God will look at you and ask why you didn't see what everybody else >>> >> sees. >> > >> >And the reason is because we're not hitting the sacramental wine. > No, you refuse to look. Not particularly interested in watching priests pork little boys.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-10 15:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <94c0qahuej4clu9t67b87g02is76oijut7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1939549 |
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:40:30 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >duke wrote: >> On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:49:00 -0800, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >> >>> >duke wrote: >>>> >> And then God will look at you and ask why you didn't see what everybody else >>>> >> sees. >>> > >>> >And the reason is because we're not hitting the sacramental wine. >> No, you refuse to look. > >Not particularly interested in watching priests pork little boys. Right, there has never been any witnesses. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-10 14:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mnpd2t11r9p@news4.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #1939912 |
duke wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:40:30 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: > >> >duke wrote: >>> >> On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:49:00 -0800, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>> >> >>>>> >>> >duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>> >> And then God will look at you and ask why you didn't see what everybody else >>>>>>> >>>> >> sees. >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> >And the reason is because we're not hitting the sacramental wine. >>> >> No, you refuse to look. >> > >> >Not particularly interested in watching priests pork little boys. > Right, there has never been any witnesses. Except the little boys, but if they spill the beans they get excommunicated and go to hell.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 09:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q9pnpatf6ctpelgn8borle346gdl1qikb4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937953 |
On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 05:23:37 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >On 7/6/2015 2:52 PM, duke wrote: >> >>> Gordon, this episode in the bible..The virgin birth part, seems to sound >>> a bit like a Jerry Springer episode. >>> >>> "I'm pregnant and I never had sex" >>> >>> Then some dumb ass named Joe comes out on stage and is regaled with >>> howls of laughter from the studio audience as he announces that he >>> believes her. >> >> And that's why nobody pays you any mind. You think like you're Jerry Springer. > > >Big difference between me and your god, Duke. If people pay me no mind, >I don't threaten them with eternal hellfire as does your evil god. > >And since you seem to find joy in the thoughts of others burning and >suffering while you chill up in heaven, I would say that you have >created your god exactly in your own image. actually I think his god is the exact same way, it loves to see people butn in hell....OH wait that is satan....hmmm yup again I have shown that duke worships satan..... since duke is fat enough to have is own gravational field then maybe he consideres himself a god.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 11:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mnh075$lql$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1938116 |
On 7/7/2015 9:44 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 05:23:37 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/6/2015 2:52 PM, duke wrote: >>> >>>> Gordon, this episode in the bible..The virgin birth part, seems to sound >>>> a bit like a Jerry Springer episode. >>>> >>>> "I'm pregnant and I never had sex" >>>> >>>> Then some dumb ass named Joe comes out on stage and is regaled with >>>> howls of laughter from the studio audience as he announces that he >>>> believes her. >>> >>> And that's why nobody pays you any mind. You think like you're Jerry Springer. >> >> >> Big difference between me and your god, Duke. If people pay me no mind, >> I don't threaten them with eternal hellfire as does your evil god. >> >> And since you seem to find joy in the thoughts of others burning and >> suffering while you chill up in heaven, I would say that you have >> created your god exactly in your own image. > > > actually I think his god is the exact same way, it loves to see people > butn in hell....OH wait that is satan....hmmm yup again I have shown > that duke worships satan..... > > since duke is fat enough to have is own gravational field then maybe > he consideres himself a god. > unless he has fatter friends, then his gravational field would be overcome by others, and they would be his gods (?)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-06 21:09 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <kdokpa5koegmvp5hdcbgfacf28sn77893u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937272 |
On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:23:45 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >>>>Hey dookie dopey, what about Thor, Zeus, Jupiter, and all the others? >>>>That heaven of yours must be a really interesting place.... don't the god's >>>>ever fight for the top job? >>> >>>There's only one God almighty. >>>Christianity - called God, family of God >>>Judaism - called Jehovah, servant of God >>>Muslim - called Allah, submissive to God. >>> >>>See how simple that is. Even..........YOU........can relate to that. >> >>I can certainly relate to how simple your mind must be. >>I suppose you still think jesus christ's mother hadn't been screwed. >> >No one knows just how Mary's pregnancy was initiated but I am >confident that God could have caused this without copulating with her >or having any male angel or human copulate with her. > >One possibility is that God caused a cosmic ray to strike Mary's ovum >that was coming into haploid division and this cosmic ray altered one >of the X chromosomes into a functional Y chromosome. Then by some >similar process God caused the ovum to reverse its haploid division >and revert to a diploid state then continue the gestation process. >About 9 months later the male baby Jesus was born. hahahhhaahha! Good one Gordon... HHAHHAHHHHHAHHHA! BRILLIANT! __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-06 05:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-F4D873.05504806072015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #1937458 |
In article <kdokpa5koegmvp5hdcbgfacf28sn77893u@4ax.com>, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: > On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:23:45 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: > > > >>>>Hey dookie dopey, what about Thor, Zeus, Jupiter, and all the others? > >>>>That heaven of yours must be a really interesting place.... don't the > >>>>god's > >>>>ever fight for the top job? > >>> > >>>There's only one God almighty. > >>>Christianity - called God, family of God > >>>Judaism - called Jehovah, servant of God > >>>Muslim - called Allah, submissive to God. > >>> > >>>See how simple that is. Even..........YOU........can relate to that. > >> > >>I can certainly relate to how simple your mind must be. > >>I suppose you still think jesus christ's mother hadn't been screwed. > >> > >No one knows just how Mary's pregnancy was initiated but I am > >confident that God could have caused this without copulating with her > >or having any male angel or human copulate with her. > > > >One possibility is that God caused a cosmic ray to strike Mary's ovum > >that was coming into haploid division and this cosmic ray altered one > >of the X chromosomes into a functional Y chromosome. Then by some > >similar process God caused the ovum to reverse its haploid division > >and revert to a diploid state then continue the gestation process. > >About 9 months later the male baby Jesus was born. > > hahahhhaahha! Good one Gordon... HHAHHAHHHHHAHHHA! BRILLIANT! Yeah, his attempts at explaining away the bad stuff in his bible are reaching truly desperate levels. This "explanation" here is far beyond pathetic. -- JD Being open-minded is merely the willingness to consider evidence, not the willingness to accept claims without any.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-06 08:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ti0lpa1fghafh32jq03ha8ru44d602opoe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937478 |
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 05:50:48 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >In article <kdokpa5koegmvp5hdcbgfacf28sn77893u@4ax.com>, > Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: > >> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:23:45 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>Hey dookie dopey, what about Thor, Zeus, Jupiter, and all the others? >> >>>>That heaven of yours must be a really interesting place.... don't the >> >>>>god's >> >>>>ever fight for the top job? >> >>> >> >>>There's only one God almighty. >> >>>Christianity - called God, family of God >> >>>Judaism - called Jehovah, servant of God >> >>>Muslim - called Allah, submissive to God. >> >>> >> >>>See how simple that is. Even..........YOU........can relate to that. >> >> >> >>I can certainly relate to how simple your mind must be. >> >>I suppose you still think jesus christ's mother hadn't been screwed. >> >> >> >No one knows just how Mary's pregnancy was initiated but I am >> >confident that God could have caused this without copulating with her >> >or having any male angel or human copulate with her. >> > >> >One possibility is that God caused a cosmic ray to strike Mary's ovum >> >that was coming into haploid division and this cosmic ray altered one >> >of the X chromosomes into a functional Y chromosome. Then by some >> >similar process God caused the ovum to reverse its haploid division >> >and revert to a diploid state then continue the gestation process. >> >About 9 months later the male baby Jesus was born. >> >> hahahhhaahha! Good one Gordon... HHAHHAHHHHHAHHHA! BRILLIANT! > > >Yeah, his attempts at explaining away the bad stuff in his bible are >reaching truly desperate levels. This "explanation" here is far beyond >pathetic. He seems to have some deep seated reason to want to be treated as an idiot. The common Christian martyr complex? But I've got news for him - he's not treated as one for his religious beliefs, but because he is one. For example being so in-your-face with what is nonsense to anybody with a high-school level of education, talking AT people outside his religion whom he knows don't share his religious beliefs as if they did, etc. Which is worse? That he believes his stupid, nonsensical rationalisations? Or that he doesn't and is just being a deliberate jerk for the sake of it? Either way, there is something seriously wrong with him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-06 13:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jgjlpa9ktuv98ugb0su49v7fdj0l4dfc1u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937227 |
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 07:48:46 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 08:10:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 08:47:21 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: > >>>>>Hey dooky, why don't your god and the muslim god like each other? >>>> >>>>Good question.............from a dumbass. >>>> >>>>They are one and the same, along with Jehovah. All 3 call Abraham the Father of >>>>their faith. >> >>>Hey dookie dopey, what about Thor, Zeus, Jupiter, and all the others? >>>That heaven of yours must be a really interesting place.... don't the god's >>>ever fight for the top job? >> >>There's only one God almighty. >>Christianity - called God, family of God >>Judaism - called Jehovah, servant of God >>Muslim - called Allah, submissive to God. >> >>See how simple that is. Even..........YOU........can relate to that. > >I can certainly relate to how simple your mind must be. >I suppose you still think jesus christ's mother hadn't been screwed. By who? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-05 10:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <j4kipateb30bobis5idfv7esshdnmi18rc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1936729 |
On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 08:47:21 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: >On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 08:37:17 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 08:30:32 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: > >>>>There are no seats in heaven available for selling used cars. Most of those >>>>guys end up downtown. It would be a good job for you maybe, but not me. >>> >>>Hey dooky, why don't your god and the muslim god like each other? >> >>Good question.............from a dumbass. >> >>They are one and the same, along with Jehovah. All 3 call Abraham the Father of >>their faith. > >Hey dookie dopey, what about Thor, Zeus, Jupiter, and all the others? You forgot one. The Great and Powerful Oz >That heaven of yours must be a really interesting place.... don't the god's >ever fight for the top job? > >>>Henry Wilson DSc. >> >>the dukester, American-American >> >>***** >>"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." >>Pope Paul VI >>***** > >__ > >Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-30 07:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mmttcb$79n$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1933313 |
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:e2t0patcl9gsvlolh0765dm5n9eu2ohihu@4ax.com... > On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 19:06:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> >> Oh, I don't. I know you believe in God. You just don't >>>>>>>>> >> >> find the evidence convincing. But believe you do. >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >If this is some kind of a joke, I admit I don't get it. >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> That's the definition of an agnostic. Not even close, as usual. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >That didn't help. What is the definition of an agnostic? Earlier >>>>>>>>> >you have said that an agnostic is 'somebody who doesn't believe >>>>>>>>> >in gods'. >>>>>>>>> >(I kind find the quotes if you try to deny it). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Stupid people like you can never get it straight. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> An agnostic is one that doesn't find the evidence for God >>>>>>>>> convincing. Not even close, as usual. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You're simply wrong. In an earlier post I linked to a couple of >>>>>>>>definitions of agnostic. None of them agree with yours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's because mine is correct. Not even close, as usual. >>>>>> >>>>>>Exactly as the madman says that he's sane and everyone else is mad. >>>>>> >>>>>>> You're a fool because YOU..........CANNOT profess there is no God. >>>>>> >>>>>>And you cannot show evidence that there is one. Until you do, there's >>>>>>nothing to deny. >>>>> >>>>> You see, your mistake is here: I have evidence for God's existence. >>>>> You can't see it but you can't deny that I have it. And if I have >>>>> it, it means it exists. You can't claim to have it then claim it's invisible, idiot. So: Not even close, as usual.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-25 23:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <558c6e68$0$23228$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #1931081 |
"Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen news:mmf8jn$tjh$1@speranza.aioe.org... > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:25:24 -0500, duke wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:22:44 +0200, "Malte Runz" > > <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: > > > >>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen > >>news:ncmjoapchum9vgbj90oh6ebapoo0e12cuf@4ax.com... > >>> > >>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:42:41 +0200, "Malte Runz" > >>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen > >>> >news:lu6eoal97ucehqjrm44g10jhc9eg34ffdq@4ax.com... (snip) (piggybacking again) > >>> An agnostic is one that doesn't find the evidence for God convincing. > >>> ... > >> > >>You're simply wrong. In an earlier post I linked to a couple of > >>definitions of agnostic. None of them agree with yours. > > > > That's because mine is correct. Why do you do this? You can't take a word, like agnostic, that is clearly defined, and just give it another definition. It doesn't make sense. It would like me saying 'Christians believe that Santa lives on an invisible pink moon. You might have another definition, but mine is right!!!'. > > Exactly as the madman says that he's sane and everyone else is mad. I think he is 'farting in the elevator'. Being deliberately discusting because he knows he can't beat us using sane and rational arguments, and there is nothing we can do to make him stop. > > > > > You're a fool because YOU..........CANNOT profess there is no God. I have never done that. I've pointed it out to you several times, but I'll gladly do it again: I, Malte F. Runz, believe that there are no gods anywhere in any universes. Call it whatever you want if it makes you happy, but at least have the decency to not strawman my POW. > > And you cannot show evidence that there is one. Until you do, there's > nothing to deny. He apparently believes that we KNOW that God is real, but we really want to go to Hell and burn forever and therefore we pretend to not believe in him and sin, sin, sin. > > > You > > have no evidence for such; you have no support for such. And the > > definition of atheism is the you deny/reject the existence of God. If you by "deny/reject" mean 'do not believe in the existence of' then you're spot on. > > Nope. The definition of atheism is that I do not believe in any god(s). > Whether they exist or not is immaterial. > > > You simply cannot do that. So you cannot be an atheist. > > Only according to you. > Exactly as the madman says that he's sane and everyone else is mad. > > >>> ... The evidence is there; ... > >>All you have is a bible and your own belief in it's value as evidence. > > > > Evidence is in the eyes of the beholder. > > Then, in my eyes, that you still owe me $55 million is evidence of that > debt. Repayment is due at the end of this month. > > > I clearly see evidence for God's existence. And Don Quixote galloped towards the windmills > > I clearly see evidence for your debt to me of $55 million.. > > > YOU............CANNOT offer evidence for there being no God. > > YOU............CANNOT offer evidence for there being no debt. > > >>> ... it can't be denied. ... > >>Quote me: There is no valid evidence for the existence of any gods. > > > > Quote me: There is. > > Then provide it. Bet you can't. What kind of odds are we talking about here? (snip) -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-26 21:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mmkhid$773$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1931563 |
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 23:11:06 +0200, Malte Runz wrote: > "Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen news:mmf8jn$tjh$1@speranza.aioe.org... <snip> >> >>Quote me: There is no valid evidence for the existence of any gods. >> > >> > Quote me: There is. >> >> Then provide it. Bet you can't. > > What kind of odds are we talking about here? > > (snip) The $55 million that he owes me, double or quits. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-26 17:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sqkroa9lf34lpfdjk056r0gkma9io6dr5m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1931563 |
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 23:11:06 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen news:mmf8jn$tjh$1@speranza.aioe.org... >> >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:25:24 -0500, duke wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:22:44 +0200, "Malte Runz" >> > <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >> > >> >>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >> >>news:ncmjoapchum9vgbj90oh6ebapoo0e12cuf@4ax.com... >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:42:41 +0200, "Malte Runz" >> >>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >> >>> >news:lu6eoal97ucehqjrm44g10jhc9eg34ffdq@4ax.com... > >(snip) > >(piggybacking again) > > >> >>> An agnostic is one that doesn't find the evidence for God convincing. >> >>> ... >> >> >> >>You're simply wrong. In an earlier post I linked to a couple of >> >>definitions of agnostic. None of them agree with yours. >> > >> > That's because mine is correct. > >Why do you do this? You can't take a word, like agnostic, that is clearly >defined, and just give it another definition. It doesn't make sense. It >would like me saying 'Christians believe that Santa lives on an invisible >pink moon. You might have another definition, but mine is right!!!'. Nobody's done that. There's only 3 positions: 1. Believer of the evidence. 2. Unsure of the validity of the evidence. 3. Rejecter of the evidence. If there was no evidence, you could make a point. But with evidence, it's impossible to be a Rejecter of that which others have. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 19 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19]
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web