Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #1930579 > unrolled thread
| Started by | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-23 17:13 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-06-26 17:37 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 378 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-23 17:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-24 00:22 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-24 14:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-24 14:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-25 13:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-24 21:48 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-25 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-25 21:35 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-26 17:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-27 19:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-28 17:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-29 20:05 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-29 17:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-30 08:43 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-29 17:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-30 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-04 08:30 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-04 08:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-05 08:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 08:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 06:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 10:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 10:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 08:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 11:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 10:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 12:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 14:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 18:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 21:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 08:45 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-07-10 06:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:45 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 21:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-06 17:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:03 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 07:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 10:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:57 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 10:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 12:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 10:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-07 23:55 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-09 04:46 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-09 01:41 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-09 23:10 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:13 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:40 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-07 17:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 18:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 17:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:54 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:54 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 18:35 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 17:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:21 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-05 14:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-05 20:00 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-05 18:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 20:59 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-07 17:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 11:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 11:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 23:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 06:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 08:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 07:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 08:42 -0400
Re: "Believers" won't go to heaven. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 06:22 -0400
Re: "Believers" won't go to heaven. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 06:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 09:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:14 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 10:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 10:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 07:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:53 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.nut> - 2015-07-10 13:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 09:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-10 14:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 17:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 17:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 17:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 17:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 08:51 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 16:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 11:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 20:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 10:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 21:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 21:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 23:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:35 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 18:03 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-07 20:29 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 21:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 09:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 10:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 13:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 00:37 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 12:36 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 10:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 14:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 14:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 12:54 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 10:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 21:02 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-08 18:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:50 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-09 17:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 16:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 00:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 19:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 13:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:01 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 09:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-10 15:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:49 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 00:09 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-08 14:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:43 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-08 16:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:19 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:21 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-10 00:13 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 19:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 18:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 14:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 20:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 11:35 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 11:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 12:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 13:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 14:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 19:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:59 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 07:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 21:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 23:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-09 00:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:55 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-06 18:37 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 01:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:05 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:02 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 09:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 13:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 12:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 14:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 16:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:08 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:28 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-06 07:48 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 18:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 20:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 12:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 03:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 19:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 15:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 09:06 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 07:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-07 08:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:40 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 22:24 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 07:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:04 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 10:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 17:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:41 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 22:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.nut> - 2015-07-10 13:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 07:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:44 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 22:37 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:49 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:40 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-10 14:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-07 11:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-06 21:09 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 05:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 08:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 10:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-30 07:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-25 23:11 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-26 21:52 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-26 17:37 -0500
Page 10 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 19 Next page →
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 10:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k0tnpademhdnmv7m7i56s2t2ov1h138f31@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938112 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 09:39:18 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 09:48:13 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 7/7/2015 7:47 AM, Gordon wrote: >>> >>>> WHY should I believe in your god, Gordon? What REASON? >>>> >>> Because there is no other rational explanation as to how the >>> multiverse/universe and all life forms came into existence. Random >>> chance falls WAY short. >> >> >>Surprisingly Gordon, I agree with most of that. >> >>There is NO rational explanation as to how the universe came to be. >>It is beyond our present understanding of physics, and may ALWAYS be. >> >>But this is where we part company. I am happy to continue searching for >>answers and you are happy claiming that a lack of knowledge is some sort >>of evidence for god. >> >Same, here, but I have reached the firm conclusion that there is some >form of cosmic intelligence involved and I call that cosmic >intelligence, God. And that somehow makes it so? You need to explain exactly how you reached that conclusion, instead of rudely and stupidly talking at an audience who don't share your belief in bronze-age mythology, as if it were universally granted. >As a way of conceptualizing this, I think of all the sub-atomic >particles in the multiverse being linked together by something like >quantum entanglements. These entanglements function as do the synapses >in our brain. This is the mind of God. WHAT FUCKING MIND OF WHAT FUCKING GOD, question-begging moron? Again, you left out the part where you convinced people outside your religion that this was anything more than a figment of your deluded imagination. >Please keep in mind that this is just a prognosis or guess on my part >but it does seem possible and if it is true this would explain all >that we are still questioning about. Please keep in mind the fact that you are pig-ignorant, stupid, rude moron. >>It is a willful lie some people tell themselves because that's what they >>are supposed to believe. I was raised catholic. Hard core catholic. >>On the wall near our front door were three pictures. Jesus, Pope John >>the 23rd and JFK. (I just didn't know what order they were in). >> >>I attended a Jesuit/catholic school where they made the mistake of >>teaching me to think. In 2nd grade I got rapped off the head for asking >>where Noah put all the dinosaurs. Hehehehe... >The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for >conveying some useful embedded information. Most importantly, it was >and still is such as can be told and re-told among people of all >levels of education and basic understanding and the embedded >information is not lost. WHAT FUCKING "USEFUL EMBEDDED INFORMATION" ARE YOU LYING ABOUT? >>It was downhill from there on. >> >>In 6th grade we has a batshit crazy nun who told us about missionary >>work she did in S. America. She claimed she saw some possessed kid >>breathing fire. Another non-starter was her story of a kid who 'had no >>gravity to him'. She said he would just float away until they wisely put >>ball bearings in his shoe heels. >> >>...She was my favorite nun. >> >Yeah, I've encountered people like this but I don't blame them. I >realize that not all people, religious or non-religious, are of firm >mind. Including yourself. > I can understand how some such as you mention may have this kind >of mental image...sort of like a dream at night but it doesn't stop >when the person wakes up. Just like your "mental image" that when the people who wrote down myths and legends which had been passed down from generation to generation and had mutated with each re-telling, actually meant what you imagine is today's scientific knowledge but isn't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 13:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mnh0f2$ldf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1938112 |
On 7/7/2015 10:39 AM, Gordon wrote: > >> There is NO rational explanation as to how the universe came to be. >> It is beyond our present understanding of physics, and may ALWAYS be. >> >> But this is where we part company. I am happy to continue searching for >> answers and you are happy claiming that a lack of knowledge is some sort >> of evidence for god. >> > Same, here, but I have reached the firm conclusion that there is some > form of cosmic intelligence involved and I call that cosmic > intelligence, God. > > As a way of conceptualizing this, I think of all the sub-atomic > particles in the multiverse being linked together by something like > quantum entanglements. These entanglements function as do the synapses > in our brain. This is the mind of God. Lol -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 00:37 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <559c54be$0$23216$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #1938112 |
"Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com... (snip) > The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for > conveying some useful embedded information. Like what? (snip) -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 02:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ps3nx.165451$ax2.92630@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #1938355 |
On 07/07/2015 06:37 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
> "Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen
> news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com...
>
> (snip)
>
>> The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for
>> conveying some useful embedded information.
>
> Like what?
For example it suggests that at one time the sea level was much lower.
And then it rose inundating most of civilization from which some humans
migrated to new higher lands and started a new life with the same farm
animals etc. that they could save and bring along.
Well Warmballers talk about the horrible destruction of sea levels
rising a few meters because humans tend to populate the coasts. Now
consider the post-ice age rise of 400 feet! Just how much of human
settlements do you suppose got wiped out. LOTS.
Does the Noah allegory pretty much describe this event? Yes it does.
However those with a political agenda try to say that such stories must
be interpreted as precise truth. Such a view with regard to myth from
the depths of history is obviously anti-scientific and politically
motivated. You can see this in action with Velikovsky's books. Basically
he only said, Hey, look at these old myths, maybe there is a grain of
truth in them? But the attack on him was relentless. Every argument was
that if you interpreted the myths word for word as precisely true they
were nonsense. Which was just a political strawman to chop down. So what
was the establishment so scared of. THAT is the real question.
Oddly, Lib journalists make up shit for news all the time. Nobody bats
an eye. But discuss a myth from prehistory and suddenly everyone is
screaming for absolute accuracy. Obviously an agenda is at work.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 12:36 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <559cfd20$0$23234$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #1938526 |
"benj" skrev i meddelelsen news:ps3nx.165451$ax2.92630@fx07.iad... > > On 07/07/2015 06:37 PM, Malte Runz wrote: > > "Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen > > news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com... > > > > (snip) > > > >> The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for > >> conveying some useful embedded information. > > > > Like what? > > For example it suggests that at one time the sea level was much lower. No it doesn't. It says that the water levels rose then fell again. But I seriously doubt that the Noah-myth is a lesson in geology. > And then it rose inundating most of civilization from which some humans > migrated to new higher lands and started a new life with the same farm > animals etc. that they could save and bring along. And the waters receded, according to the bronze age myth you somehow feel has relevance and "useful embedded information". > > Well Warmballers talk about the horrible destruction of sea levels rising > a few meters because humans tend to populate the coasts. Now consider the > post-ice age rise of 400 feet! Just how much of human settlements do you > suppose got wiped out. LOTS. > > Does the Noah allegory pretty much describe this event? ... Where in the Noah-myth is there talk about ice age? What you're doing is post-rationalization. Why do you feel the need to defend the old myths? > ... Yes it does. Well, no, it doesn't. Not a word about ice age and rising sea levels do to the melting of the ice. One could argue that the origin of the myth goes back to a catastrophic local event, and because of their abysmal ignorance (I don't blame them) they cooked up a story about an angry god. (snip OT rant) -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 08:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cp7qpadu33im6o4i2bs1dq8bgrg519pesc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938597 |
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:36:18 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"benj" skrev i meddelelsen news:ps3nx.165451$ax2.92630@fx07.iad... >> >> On 07/07/2015 06:37 PM, Malte Runz wrote: >> > "Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen >> > news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com... >> > >> > (snip) >> > >> >> The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for >> >> conveying some useful embedded information. >> > >> > Like what? >> >> For example it suggests that at one time the sea level was much lower. > >No it doesn't. It says that the water levels rose then fell again. But I >seriously doubt that the Noah-myth is a lesson in geology. Anybody who takes the flood story seriously, is a blithering idiot. >> And then it rose inundating most of civilization from which some humans >> migrated to new higher lands and started a new life with the same farm >> animals etc. that they could save and bring along. > >And the waters receded, according to the bronze age myth you somehow feel >has relevance and "useful embedded information". >> Well Warmballers talk about the horrible destruction of sea levels rising >> a few meters because humans tend to populate the coasts. Now consider the >> post-ice age rise of 400 feet! Just how much of human settlements do you >> suppose got wiped out. LOTS. And? Were a billion people living in these settlements? Were they major cities vital to the economies of the country and the world? Does he care about what happens to them? I've posted this link before. For those who don't know, Bangladesh includes a huge delta, where the Ganges and Brahmaputra rivers combine and flow into the Bay of Bengal. This is some of the most fertile agricultural land anywhere, because of the material deposited during floods due to Himalayan snow melt. The country stands to lose a thind of its area. http://weather.climate25.com/project/major-general-munir-muniruzzaman-ret/ >> Does the Noah allegory pretty much describe this event? ... What a fucking moron. >Where in the Noah-myth is there talk about ice age? What you're doing is >post-rationalization. Why do you feel the need to defend the old myths? BEcause he has a psychological need for them to be true. >> ... Yes it does. What a fucking moron. >Well, no, it doesn't. Not a word about ice age and rising sea levels do to >the melting of the ice. One could argue that the origin of the myth goes >back to a catastrophic local event, and because of their abysmal ignorance >(I don't blame them) they cooked up a story about an angry god. The primitives had an excuse because they didn't hace the benetis of something like five t housand years of knowledge and understanding since then. But today's religious loonies don't, and they are bent on taking us back to the dark ages - while taking advantage of the very scientifically derived modern understanding they reject. >(snip OT rant)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 10:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mnjbpo$bqq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1938646 |
On 7/8/2015 9:18 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > >>>>> The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for >>>>> conveying some useful embedded information. >>>> >>>> Like what? >>> >>> For example it suggests that at one time the sea level was much lower. >> >> No it doesn't. It says that the water levels rose then fell again. But I >> seriously doubt that the Noah-myth is a lesson in geology. > > Anybody who takes the flood story seriously, is a blithering idiot. Hear that BJ? It's not just me that thinks you are an idiot. Matter of fact, *I* have been nice to you because *I* never called you a 'blithering' idiot. -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 14:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <uPdnx.170277$GA1.22982@fx19.iad> |
| In reply to | #1938667 |
On 07/08/2015 10:25 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On 7/8/2015 9:18 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>>
>>>>>> The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for
>>>>>> conveying some useful embedded information.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like what?
>>>>
>>>> For example it suggests that at one time the sea level was much lower.
>>>
>>> No it doesn't. It says that the water levels rose then fell again. But I
>>> seriously doubt that the Noah-myth is a lesson in geology.
>>
>> Anybody who takes the flood story seriously, is a blithering idiot.
>
>
> Hear that BJ? It's not just me that thinks you are an idiot.
> Matter of fact, *I* have been nice to you because *I* never called you a
> 'blithering' idiot.
Sea level rose 400 feet (repeat 400 FEET!) at the end of the ice age.
I'm sure that flooded nothing if you believe it didn't exist. Science is
all about what you believe, Harlow. I don't have to call you a
blithering idiot. You demonstrate the fact daily yourself!
Anyway, Chris is a Atheist Fundie just like you, Harlow. I'm sure you
two are great butt-buddies.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 14:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mnjq7v$e2m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1938749 |
On 7/8/2015 2:18 PM, benj wrote: > >>> Anybody who takes the flood story seriously, is a blithering idiot. >> >> >> Hear that BJ? It's not just me that thinks you are an idiot. >> Matter of fact, *I* have been nice to you because *I* never called you a >> 'blithering' idiot. > > Sea level rose 400 feet (repeat 400 FEET!) at the end of the ice age. > I'm sure that flooded nothing if you believe it didn't exist. Science is > all about what you believe, Harlow. I don't have to call you a > blithering idiot. You demonstrate the fact daily yourself! > > Anyway, Chris is a Atheist Fundie just like you, Harlow. I'm sure you > two are great butt-buddies. Too funny! BJ is a believer in the Noah's Ark bible lie, yet he claims to be a 'scientist'. Of course he also thinks creation science should be taught in our schools. I'm sure his brand of 'science' is a hoot. -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 11:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0g8tpah86oe0mremvg6isurg1pr3d8orma@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938667 |
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:25:25 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >On 7/8/2015 9:18 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote: >> >>>>>> The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for >>>>>> conveying some useful embedded information. >>>>> >>>>> Like what? >>>> >>>> For example it suggests that at one time the sea level was much lower. >>> >>> No it doesn't. It says that the water levels rose then fell again. But I >>> seriously doubt that the Noah-myth is a lesson in geology. >> >> Anybody who takes the flood story seriously, is a blithering idiot. > > >Hear that BJ? It's not just me that thinks you are an idiot. >Matter of fact, *I* have been nice to you because *I* never called you a >'blithering' idiot. He's more intelligent on the subject than you are. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 11:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc8tpatgj7qd72quno0l1ph3pipciaa9rt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938646 |
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 08:18:20 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:36:18 +0200, "Malte Runz" ><malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: > >>"benj" skrev i meddelelsen news:ps3nx.165451$ax2.92630@fx07.iad... >>> >>> On 07/07/2015 06:37 PM, Malte Runz wrote: >>> > "Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen >>> > news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com... >>> > >>> > (snip) >>> > >>> >> The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for >>> >> conveying some useful embedded information. >>> > >>> > Like what? >>> >>> For example it suggests that at one time the sea level was much lower. >> >>No it doesn't. It says that the water levels rose then fell again. But I >>seriously doubt that the Noah-myth is a lesson in geology. > >Anybody who takes the flood story seriously, is a blithering idiot. Even the bible admits it's not a scientific statement. >>> And then it rose inundating most of civilization from which some humans >>> migrated to new higher lands and started a new life with the same farm >>> animals etc. that they could save and bring along. >> >>And the waters receded, according to the bronze age myth you somehow feel >>has relevance and "useful embedded information". > > >>> Well Warmballers talk about the horrible destruction of sea levels rising >>> a few meters because humans tend to populate the coasts. Now consider the >>> post-ice age rise of 400 feet! Just how much of human settlements do you >>> suppose got wiped out. LOTS. >And? >Were a billion people living in these settlements? Were they major >cities vital to the economies of the country and the world? Doubtful. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 07:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bcqspad7c2hb5sqh2q1sqkvvpkbkggpkko@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938597 |
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:36:18 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >And the waters receded, according to the bronze age myth you somehow feel >has relevance and "useful embedded information". You've learned. >> Well Warmballers talk about the horrible destruction of sea levels rising >> a few meters because humans tend to populate the coasts. Now consider the >> post-ice age rise of 400 feet! Just how much of human settlements do you >> suppose got wiped out. LOTS. >> >> Does the Noah allegory pretty much describe this event? ... > >Where in the Noah-myth is there talk about ice age? What you're doing is >post-rationalization. Why do you feel the need to defend the old myths? > >> ... Yes it does. > >Well, no, it doesn't. Not a word about ice age and rising sea levels do to >the melting of the ice. One could argue that the origin of the myth goes >back to a catastrophic local event, and because of their abysmal ignorance >(I don't blame them) they cooked up a story about an angry god. > >(snip OT rant) the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 02:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-D16DB9.02100808072015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #1938355 |
In article <559c54be$0$23216$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk>, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: > "Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen > news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com... > > (snip) > > > The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for > > conveying some useful embedded information. > > Like what? > > (snip) I'd like to know, too. -- JD Being open-minded is merely the willingness to consider evidence, not the willingness to accept claims without any.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 12:54 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <559d017b$0$23212$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #1938571 |
"Jeanne Douglas" skrev i meddelelsen news:hlwdjsd2-D16DB9.02100808072015@news.giganews.com... > > In article <559c54be$0$23216$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk>, > "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: > > > "Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen > > news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com... > > > > (snip) > > > > > The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for > > > conveying some useful embedded information. > > > > Like what? > > > > (snip) > > I'd like to know, too. And if the information is useful why not give it to us straight? Why embed it in a story that only provokes ridicule 4000 years later? -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 08:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dq8qpalt7t8jhn5jbv372qq25p2k957clb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938601 |
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:54:53 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"Jeanne Douglas" skrev i meddelelsen >news:hlwdjsd2-D16DB9.02100808072015@news.giganews.com... >> >> In article <559c54be$0$23216$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk>, >> "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >> >> > "Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen >> > news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com... >> > >> > (snip) >> > >> > > The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means for >> > > conveying some useful embedded information. >> > >> > Like what? >> > >> > (snip) >> >> I'd like to know, too. > >And if the information is useful why not give it to us straight? Why embed >it in a story that only provokes ridicule 4000 years later? I wouldn't say the story does - after all, it's just like the Greek and other myths. What is ridiculed is the fact that people don't just take it seriously themselves, they want everybody else to so they attack the science which shows it to be nonsense and try to get it taught as fact. The lunacy is dangerous. "What's that, Mr Lee? You've got a serious staph infection in the blood that caused an abscess in the chest cavity, which burst and filled the cavity with a mixture of blood, plasma and pus, collapsing the lung so you can't breathe? Don't worry about it, we'll pray for you. After all, there are no antibiotics, no paracentesis to drain the fluid, etc - but we'll convert you before you die so you don't go to a hell only Christians believe in"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 10:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mnjbrr$bqq$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1938647 |
On 7/8/2015 9:31 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > > The lunacy is dangerous. > > "What's that, Mr Lee? You've got a serious staph infection in the > blood that caused an abscess in the chest cavity, which burst and > filled the cavity with a mixture of blood, plasma and pus, collapsing > the lung so you can't breathe? Don't worry about it, we'll pray for > you. After all, there are no antibiotics, no paracentesis to drain > the fluid, etc - but we'll convert you before you die so you don't go > to a hell only Christians believe in" Send in the leeches. -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 21:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <559d73c0$0$23212$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #1938647 |
"Christopher A. Lee" skrev i meddelelsen news:dq8qpalt7t8jhn5jbv372qq25p2k957clb@4ax.com... > > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:54:53 +0200, "Malte Runz" > <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: > > >"Jeanne Douglas" skrev i meddelelsen > >news:hlwdjsd2-D16DB9.02100808072015@news.giganews.com... > >> > >> In article <559c54be$0$23216$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk>, > >> "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: > >> > >> > "Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen > >> > news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com... > >> > > >> > (snip) > >> > > >> > > The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means > >> > > for > >> > > conveying some useful embedded information. > >> > > >> > Like what? > >> > > >> > (snip) > >> > >> I'd like to know, too. > > > >And if the information is useful why not give it to us straight? Why > >embed > >it in a story that only provokes ridicule 4000 years later? > > I wouldn't say the story does - after all, it's just like the Greek > and other myths. > > What is ridiculed is the fact that people don't just take it seriously > themselves, they want everybody else to so they attack the science > which shows it to be nonsense and try to get it taught as fact. You're right, of course. > > The lunacy is dangerous. > > "What's that, Mr Lee? You've got a serious staph infection in the > blood that caused an abscess in the chest cavity, which burst and > filled the cavity with a mixture of blood, plasma and pus, collapsing > the lung so you can't breathe? Don't worry about it, we'll pray for > you. After all, there are no antibiotics, no paracentesis to drain > the fluid, etc - but we'll convert you before you die so you don't go > to a hell only Christians believe in" 'And after you've gone to Heaven, we'll look after your children!' -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 18:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <167rpa90vntl6jiseb8abtj9i745lt2788@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938775 |
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 21:02:26 +0200, "Malte Runz"
<malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote:
>"Christopher A. Lee" skrev i meddelelsen
>news:dq8qpalt7t8jhn5jbv372qq25p2k957clb@4ax.com...
>>
>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:54:53 +0200, "Malte Runz"
>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote:
>>
>> >"Jeanne Douglas" skrev i meddelelsen
>> >news:hlwdjsd2-D16DB9.02100808072015@news.giganews.com...
>> >>
>> >> In article <559c54be$0$23216$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk>,
>> >> "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > "Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen
>> >> > news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > (snip)
>> >> >
>> >> > > The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means
>> >> > > for
>> >> > > conveying some useful embedded information.
>> >> >
>> >> > Like what?
>> >> >
>> >> > (snip)
>> >>
>> >> I'd like to know, too.
>> >
>> >And if the information is useful why not give it to us straight? Why
>> >embed
>> >it in a story that only provokes ridicule 4000 years later?
>>
>> I wouldn't say the story does - after all, it's just like the Greek
>> and other myths.
>>
>> What is ridiculed is the fact that people don't just take it seriously
>> themselves, they want everybody else to so they attack the science
>> which shows it to be nonsense and try to get it taught as fact.
>
>You're right, of course.
>
>>
>> The lunacy is dangerous.
>>
>> "What's that, Mr Lee? You've got a serious staph infection in the
>> blood that caused an abscess in the chest cavity, which burst and
>> filled the cavity with a mixture of blood, plasma and pus, collapsing
>> the lung so you can't breathe? Don't worry about it, we'll pray for
>> you. After all, there are no antibiotics, no paracentesis to drain
>> the fluid, etc - but we'll convert you before you die so you don't go
>> to a hell only Christians believe in"
>
>'And after you've gone to Heaven, we'll look after your children!'
More accurately, we'll rear you children.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 10:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <d06qusFr88jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #1938899 |
On 09/07/2015 00:48, Don Martin wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 21:02:26 +0200, "Malte Runz" > <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: > >> "Christopher A. Lee" skrev i meddelelsen >> news:dq8qpalt7t8jhn5jbv372qq25p2k957clb@4ax.com... >>> >>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:54:53 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>> >>>> "Jeanne Douglas" skrev i meddelelsen >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-D16DB9.02100808072015@news.giganews.com... >>>>> >>>>> In article <559c54be$0$23216$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk>, >>>>> "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen >>>>>> news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> (snip) >>>>>> >>>>>>> The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> conveying some useful embedded information. >>>>>> >>>>>> Like what? >>>>>> >>>>>> (snip) >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to know, too. >>>> >>>> And if the information is useful why not give it to us straight? Why >>>> embed >>>> it in a story that only provokes ridicule 4000 years later? >>> >>> I wouldn't say the story does - after all, it's just like the Greek >>> and other myths. >>> >>> What is ridiculed is the fact that people don't just take it seriously >>> themselves, they want everybody else to so they attack the science >>> which shows it to be nonsense and try to get it taught as fact. >> >> You're right, of course. >> >>> >>> The lunacy is dangerous. >>> >>> "What's that, Mr Lee? You've got a serious staph infection in the >>> blood that caused an abscess in the chest cavity, which burst and >>> filled the cavity with a mixture of blood, plasma and pus, collapsing >>> the lung so you can't breathe? Don't worry about it, we'll pray for >>> you. After all, there are no antibiotics, no paracentesis to drain >>> the fluid, etc - but we'll convert you before you die so you don't go >>> to a hell only Christians believe in" >> >> 'And after you've gone to Heaven, we'll look after your children!' > > More accurately, we'll rear you children. > Rear children? Are we talking Catholic priests again?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 17:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <6pntpal4sruldeo4aprn5vb0vcu127fum3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1939069 |
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:50:39 +0200, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>On 09/07/2015 00:48, Don Martin wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 21:02:26 +0200, "Malte Runz"
>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote:
>>
>>> "Christopher A. Lee" skrev i meddelelsen
>>> news:dq8qpalt7t8jhn5jbv372qq25p2k957clb@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:54:53 +0200, "Malte Runz"
>>>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" skrev i meddelelsen
>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-D16DB9.02100808072015@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <559c54be$0$23216$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk>,
>>>>>> "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Gordon" skrev i meddelelsen
>>>>>>> news:vfonpa5i0vnvof9j7eadsf2a04dd9q79ie@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The story of Noah and his arc is an allegory that provides means
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> conveying some useful embedded information.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to know, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> And if the information is useful why not give it to us straight? Why
>>>>> embed
>>>>> it in a story that only provokes ridicule 4000 years later?
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't say the story does - after all, it's just like the Greek
>>>> and other myths.
>>>>
>>>> What is ridiculed is the fact that people don't just take it seriously
>>>> themselves, they want everybody else to so they attack the science
>>>> which shows it to be nonsense and try to get it taught as fact.
>>>
>>> You're right, of course.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The lunacy is dangerous.
>>>>
>>>> "What's that, Mr Lee? You've got a serious staph infection in the
>>>> blood that caused an abscess in the chest cavity, which burst and
>>>> filled the cavity with a mixture of blood, plasma and pus, collapsing
>>>> the lung so you can't breathe? Don't worry about it, we'll pray for
>>>> you. After all, there are no antibiotics, no paracentesis to drain
>>>> the fluid, etc - but we'll convert you before you die so you don't go
>>>> to a hell only Christians believe in"
>>>
>>> 'And after you've gone to Heaven, we'll look after your children!'
>>
>> More accurately, we'll rear you children.
>>
>
>Rear children?
>
>Are we talking Catholic priests again?
And most of them do the rearing without any need for Viagra. It's a
Miracle!
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web