Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2175017 > unrolled thread

God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design

Started byJTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
First post2016-09-29 11:27 -0700
Last post2016-10-01 01:40 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 42 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism

Contents

  God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:27 -0700
    Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., ^RD11^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-09-29 17:09 -0500
      Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 20:23 -0700
        Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., ^RD11^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-09-29 22:26 -0500
          Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-09-30 09:00 -0500
            Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 11:35 -0700
              Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-09-30 14:27 -0500
    Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design default <default@defaulter.net> - 2016-09-30 05:58 -0400
      Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-30 04:41 -0700
      Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 11:39 -0700
        Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-09-30 14:31 -0500
        Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design default <default@defaulter.net> - 2016-10-01 06:19 -0400
          Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 23:14 -0700
            Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-02 02:47 -0500
              Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 16:06 -0700
                Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., vrn-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-02 18:58 -0500
            Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 15:37 -0700
              Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 23:42 -0700
    Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design bilgat@m.nu - 2016-09-30 11:25 -0500
      Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 11:40 -0700
        Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-09-30 14:35 -0500
          Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design bilgat@m.nu - 2016-09-30 15:35 -0500
            Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-09-30 16:57 -0700
              Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 22:15 -0700
                Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-01 01:39 -0500
            Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 22:14 -0700
              Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-01 01:37 -0500
          Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 22:13 -0700
            Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-01 01:36 -0500
              Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 23:15 -0700
                Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-02 02:50 -0500
                Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 18:49 -0700
                  Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 22:03 -0700
                    Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., vrn-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-05 02:00 -0500
                      Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 15:15 -0700
                        Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., vrn-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-05 17:36 -0500
                          Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 23:44 -0700
                    Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., vrn-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-05 02:02 -0500
                    Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 02:03 -0700
      Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 11:52 -0700
        Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 22:17 -0700
          Re: God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design "W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-01 01:40 -0500

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#2175017 — God, the speed of light & Intelligent Design

FromJTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-29 11:27 -0700
SubjectGod, the speed of light & Intelligent Design
Message-ID<515c0198-8f01-4d62-ad6e-6e3b64e7ffa3@googlegroups.com>
Attention, collective:

Okay, so JTEM is the only voice in opposition
to the brain damaged guy, but what other
"Proof" do you have that JTEM is wrong? What,
other than the fact that the brain damaged
guy disagrees with him would compel you to believe
that JTEM is wrong and that you are right?

Oo!  I know!  It's got to be:

W.T.S., ^RD11^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*

Surely someone who so clearly is ruled by a
mental disorder would NEVER disagree with 
JTEM, unless of course they have to be right
and JTEM has to be wrong!

So, it's not just that you always agree with
the product of a brain damaged mind, you also
always agree with a visibly disordered mind!

Gosh. Is it any wonder you're so certain that
you're right?






-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/search/atheism/page/7

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175100

From"W.T.S., ^RD11^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net>
Date2016-09-29 17:09 -0500
Message-ID<XnsA692AEA12FB5Bm14mearthlinknet@216.168.4.170>
In reply to#2175017
JTEM <jtem86@Lying.Bozo> Farted out in news, again:  

<snip> JTEM running off at the mouth, why repost, once more? </snip>  

 <https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-
creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/> 
 
       <http://tinyurl.com/zascach>      
       
  <https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-
answers-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>      
        
  <http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>      
        
  <http://www.eoht.info/page/Creationism+scientists+ranked+by+idiocy> 
       
       <http://tinyurl.com/h5y2gao>      
       
   <https://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/18-creationist-arguments-
debunked> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/zb7sfyr>      
         
    <http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Creationism>  
    
          <http://tinyurl.com/zt8dycq>      
          
   <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/28/creation-origin-life-
future-adam-rutherford-review> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/hsj6u6y>      
         
  <http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/07/what-do-physicists-
think-of-michio-kaku/> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/j32bskg>      
        
  <http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_16> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/3p4e7mx>      
        
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/jyzjfar>      
        
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/pcqylyj>      
                
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/7vw8ozk>      
        
 <http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/> 
 
       <http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>      
       
  <http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>      
        
       "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
 simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
 false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
 What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
 commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
 a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
 granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
 calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
 enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. 
 
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould> 
     
        <http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>      
        
   <http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>      
         
    <http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys> 
    
          <http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>      
          
     <http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home> 
     
           <http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175213

FromJTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-29 20:23 -0700
Message-ID<443a1901-4730-4423-ab16-cf32cfc7f03a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#2175100
Case in point:


 W.T.S., ^RD11^The Lamp of Golden Truth!* wrote:
      [---snip---]





-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/151071686943

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175216

From"W.T.S., ^RD11^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net>
Date2016-09-29 22:26 -0500
Message-ID<XnsA692E44B4505Am14mearthlinknet@216.168.4.170>
In reply to#2175213
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in news:443a1901-4730-4423-ab16-
cf32cfc7f03a@googlegroups.com:

 <https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-
creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/> 
 
       <http://tinyurl.com/zascach>      
       
  <https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-
answers-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>      
        
  <http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>      
        
  <http://www.eoht.info/page/Creationism+scientists+ranked+by+idiocy> 
       
       <http://tinyurl.com/h5y2gao>      
       
   <https://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/18-creationist-arguments-
debunked> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/zb7sfyr>      
         
    <http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Creationism>  
    
          <http://tinyurl.com/zt8dycq>      
          
   <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/28/creation-origin-life-
future-adam-rutherford-review> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/hsj6u6y>      
         
  <http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/07/what-do-physicists-
think-of-michio-kaku/> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/j32bskg>      
        
  <http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_16> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/3p4e7mx>      
        
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/jyzjfar>      
        
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/pcqylyj>      
                
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/7vw8ozk>      
        
 <http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/> 
 
       <http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>      
       
  <http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>      
        
       "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
 simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
 false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
 What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
 commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
 a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
 granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
 calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
 enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. 
 
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould> 
     
        <http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>      
        
   <http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>      
         
    <http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys> 
    
          <http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>      
          
     <http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home> 
     
           <http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175355

FromChristopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
Date2016-09-30 09:00 -0500
Message-ID<krrsub9lo8m6nv6hkf09ib2siqhm4vpgr9@4ax.com>
In reply to#2175216
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 22:26:10 -0500, "W.T.S., ^RD11^The Lamp of Golden
Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> wrote:

>JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in news:443a1901-4730-4423-ab16-
>cf32cfc7f03a@googlegroups.com:

I haven't been following the thread - I've had McShitforbrains
McGuinness killfiled for a long time.

I'm guessing he's been repeating Setterfield's discredited nonsense?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175452

FromJTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-30 11:35 -0700
Message-ID<56424bf6-93d4-45c9-8fd3-0aac536ecafc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#2175355
Christopher A. Lee wrote:

> I haven't been following the thread

So you're speaking out of your customary ignorance
then. 




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/78640402336

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175476

From"W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net>
Date2016-09-30 14:27 -0500
Message-ID<XnsA693932DAF92Cm14mearthlinknet@216.168.4.170>
In reply to#2175452
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in news:56424bf6-93d4-45c9-8fd3-
0aac536ecafc@googlegroups.com:

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMk> 
      
           <http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175334

Fromdefault <default@defaulter.net>
Date2016-09-30 05:58 -0400
Message-ID<4ddsub5r3n33j24fvvdng7k5bng7ctpnpn@4ax.com>
In reply to#2175017
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:27:53 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>Attention, collective:
>
>Okay, so JTEM is the only voice in opposition
>to the brain damaged guy, but what other
>"Proof" do you have that JTEM is wrong? What,
>other than the fact that the brain damaged
>guy disagrees with him would compel you to believe
>that JTEM is wrong and that you are right?
>
>Oo!  I know!  It's got to be:
>
>W.T.S., ^RD11^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*
>
>Surely someone who so clearly is ruled by a
>mental disorder would NEVER disagree with 
>JTEM, unless of course they have to be right
>and JTEM has to be wrong!
>
>So, it's not just that you always agree with
>the product of a brain damaged mind, you also
>always agree with a visibly disordered mind!
>
>Gosh. Is it any wonder you're so certain that
>you're right?
>
JTEMp:  narcissistic little dweeb that he is...



Narcissists Are Lonely Little Creatures

Everybody knows a Trumply personality: a blowhard, a conversational
demagogue, a constant, forceful center of attention. 

"Trump Is a Near-Perfect Example of Needy Narcissism"

http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/03/trump-is-a-textbook-example-of-a-needy-narcissist.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175343

FromJeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com>
Date2016-09-30 04:41 -0700
Message-ID<hlwdjsd2-86D642.04410030092016@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#2175334
In article <4ddsub5r3n33j24fvvdng7k5bng7ctpnpn@4ax.com>,
 default <default@defaulter.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:27:53 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> >Attention, collective:
> >
> >Okay, so JTEM is the only voice in opposition
> >to the brain damaged guy, but what other
> >"Proof" do you have that JTEM is wrong? What,
> >other than the fact that the brain damaged
> >guy disagrees with him would compel you to believe
> >that JTEM is wrong and that you are right?
> >
> >Oo!  I know!  It's got to be:
> >
> >W.T.S., ^RD11^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*
> >
> >Surely someone who so clearly is ruled by a
> >mental disorder would NEVER disagree with 
> >JTEM, unless of course they have to be right
> >and JTEM has to be wrong!
> >
> >So, it's not just that you always agree with
> >the product of a brain damaged mind, you also
> >always agree with a visibly disordered mind!
> >
> >Gosh. Is it any wonder you're so certain that
> >you're right?
> >
> JTEMp:  narcissistic little dweeb that he is...
> 
> 
> 
> Narcissists Are Lonely Little Creatures
> 
> Everybody knows a Trumply personality: a blowhard, a conversational
> demagogue, a constant, forceful center of attention. 
> 
> "Trump Is a Near-Perfect Example of Needy Narcissism"
> 
> http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/03/trump-is-a-textbook-example-of-a-needy-na
> rcissist.html

Oh, boy, needy is definitely the word.

-- 

JD

Men rarely (if ever) manage to dream 
up a God superior to themselves. Most 
Gods have the manners and morals of a 
spoiled child.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175453

FromJTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-30 11:39 -0700
Message-ID<cb739252-832c-4ccc-8112-4c230664334f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#2175334
 default wrote:
 
> Narcissists Are Lonely Little Creatures

You're insisting that one would have to be a
narcissist to not adhere to your dogma...

Darwin wasn't a scientist, not even by 19th
century standards. He didn't originate common
descent. He didn't originate evolution. He
added absolutely nothing to either. In fact, his
snobbish rejection of Mendel cost science
dearly. 

What's it to you? Why do you find it impossible
to admit the truth, let go of your comfortable
myth?

If you can't see yourself, if perceiving your
own faults is going too far -- when you claim
to be an atheist who operates empirically --
what does that say about people in general?



-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/78640402336

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175481

From"W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net>
Date2016-09-30 14:31 -0500
Message-ID<XnsA69393D6EA8E9m14mearthlinknet@216.168.4.170>
In reply to#2175453
JTEM <jtem86@gmail.com> Farted out in news, again:

>  default wrote:
>  
>> Narcissists Are Lonely Little Creatures
> 
> You're insisting that one would have to be a
> narcissist to not adhere to your dogma...
Yes, you're a narcissist, JTEM!  And let's snip your 
usual made up lies and myths so we can cut to the chase:  

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMk> <------< New one!
      
           <http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

 <https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-
creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/> 
 
       <http://tinyurl.com/zascach>      
       
  <https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-
answers-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>      
        
  <http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>      
        
  <http://www.eoht.info/page/Creationism+scientists+ranked+by+idiocy> 
       
       <http://tinyurl.com/h5y2gao>      
       
   <https://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/18-creationist-arguments-
debunked> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/zb7sfyr>      
         
    <http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Creationism>  
    
          <http://tinyurl.com/zt8dycq>      
          
   <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/28/creation-origin-life-
future-adam-rutherford-review> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/hsj6u6y>      
         
  <http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/07/what-do-physicists-
think-of-michio-kaku/> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/j32bskg>      
        
  <http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_16> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/3p4e7mx>      
        
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/jyzjfar>      
        
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/pcqylyj>      
                
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/7vw8ozk>      
        
 <http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/> 
 
       <http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>      
       
  <http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>      
        
       "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
 simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
 false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
 What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
 commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
 a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
 granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
 calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
 enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. 
 
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould> 
     
        <http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>      
        
   <http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>      
         
    <http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys> 
    
          <http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>      
          
     <http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home> 
     
           <http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>      
           
      <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMk> 
      
           <http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175743

Fromdefault <default@defaulter.net>
Date2016-10-01 06:19 -0400
Message-ID<643vub1bnto3tdurejfnl71d38pn53binq@4ax.com>
In reply to#2175453
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:39:21 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
wrote:

> default wrote:
> 
>> Narcissists Are Lonely Little Creatures
>
>You're insisting that one would have to be a
>narcissist to not adhere to your dogma...

Not at all.  Someone who regards the rest of humanity as "the
collective," who strives for recognition and adulation, who has an ego
the size of "The Donald'" THOSE are the things that label you a
narcisst.  It has nothing to do with Darwin.
>
>Darwin wasn't a scientist, not even by 19th
>century standards. He didn't originate common
>descent. He didn't originate evolution. He
>added absolutely nothing to either. In fact, his
>snobbish rejection of Mendel cost science
>dearly. 
>
>What's it to you? Why do you find it impossible
>to admit the truth, let go of your comfortable
>myth?
>
>If you can't see yourself, if perceiving your
>own faults is going too far -- when you claim
>to be an atheist who operates empirically --
>what does that say about people in general?
>
Darwin and evolution aside, is this JTEM response him admitting he's a
needy narcisst?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2176066

FromJTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-01 23:14 -0700
Message-ID<6916c776-4ebb-46b0-a386-3a1d15a42cbd@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#2175743
 default wrote:

> JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
> >You're insisting that one would have to be a
> >narcissist to not adhere to your dogma...

> Not at all. 

Of course you are. Man up.

> Someone who regards the rest of humanity as "the
> collective,"

Check that ego, sparky, because you're not the
rest of humanity.

And *I* speak empirically.

You can't admit the truth about Darwin. You won't.

YOU DIDN'T.

> Darwin and evolution aside

No. No "aside." You steadfastly refused to accept
the truth about Darwin. You're reflecting reality
now, trying to make it about me.




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/151186873697

 is this JTEM response him admitting he's a
> needy narcisst?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2176090

From"W.T.S., ^J1^The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net>
Date2016-10-02 02:47 -0500
Message-ID<XnsA6951C7406969m14mearthlinknet@216.168.4.170>
In reply to#2176066
JTEM <jtem86@Lying.Bozo>  Pissed on himself again in news:  

Observe JTEM and he begs forgiveness from true scientists who love Darwin 
and evolution:  

 <https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-
creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/> 
 
       <http://tinyurl.com/zascach>      
       
   < https://edthemanicstreetpreacher.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/dawkins-
berlinski/> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/zmv3xf2>      
       
  <https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-
answers-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>      
        
  <http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>      
        
  <http://www.eoht.info/page/Creationism+scientists+ranked+by+idiocy> 
       
       <http://tinyurl.com/h5y2gao>      
       
   <https://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/18-creationist-arguments-
debunked> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/zb7sfyr>      
         
    <http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Creationism>  
    
          <http://tinyurl.com/zt8dycq>      
          
   <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/28/creation-origin-life-
future-adam-rutherford-review> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/hsj6u6y>      
         
  <http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/07/what-do-physicists-
think-of-michio-kaku/> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/j32bskg>      
        
  <http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_16> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/3p4e7mx>      
        
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/jyzjfar>      
        
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/pcqylyj>      
                
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/7vw8ozk>      
        
 <http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/> 
 
       <http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>      
       
  <http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>      
        
       "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
 simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
 false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
 What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
 commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
 a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
 granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
 calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
 enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. 
 
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould> 
     
        <http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>      
        
   <http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>      
         
    <http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys> 
    
          <http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>      
          
     <http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home> 
     
           <http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>      
           
      <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMk> 
      
           <http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2176325

FromJTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-02 16:06 -0700
Message-ID<860a6200-bd3f-42e6-8e32-47677b35fb74@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#2176090
So the collective is 100% in agreement with the
mentally disordered freak...

Says it all, right there.




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/151155459913

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2176349

From"W.T.S., vrn-The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net>
Date2016-10-02 18:58 -0500
Message-ID<XnsA695C11F07BA7m14mearthlinknet@216.168.4.170>
In reply to#2176325
JTEM <jtem86@Lying.Bozo> Farted out:

 <https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-to-
creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/> 
 
       <http://tinyurl.com/zascach>      
       
   < https://edthemanicstreetpreacher.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/dawkins-
berlinski/> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/zmv3xf2>      
       
  <https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-
answers-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>      
        
  <http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
say/> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>      
        
  <http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/magazine/unintelligent-design.html?
_r=0> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/h7ubjta>      
        
  <http://www.eoht.info/page/Creationism+scientists+ranked+by+idiocy> 
       
       <http://tinyurl.com/h5y2gao>      
       
   <https://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/18-creationist-arguments-
debunked> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/zb7sfyr>      
         
    <http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Creationism>  
    
          <http://tinyurl.com/zt8dycq>      
          
   <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/28/creation-origin-life-
future-adam-rutherford-review> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/hsj6u6y>      
         
  <http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/07/what-do-physicists-
think-of-michio-kaku/> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/j32bskg>      
        
  <http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_16> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/3p4e7mx>      
        
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/jyzjfar>      
        
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/pcqylyj>      
                
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/7vw8ozk>      
        
 <http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/> 
 
       <http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>      
       
  <http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html> 
  
        <http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>      
        
       "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
 simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
 false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
 What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
 commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
 a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
 granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
 calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
 enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould. 
 
  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould> 
     
        <http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>      
        
   <http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution> 
   
         <http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>      
         
    <http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys> 
    
          <http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>      
          
     <http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home> 
     
           <http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>      
           
      <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMk> 
      
           <http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2177575

FromCloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-05 15:37 -0700
Message-ID<75f915e4-fd6c-413d-9f19-a458f0622f64@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#2176066
On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 11:14:37 PM UTC-7, JTEM wrote:
> default wrote:
> 
> > JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >You're insisting that one would have to be a
> > >narcissist to not adhere to your dogma...
> 
> > Not at all. 
> 
> Of course you are. Man up.
> 
> > Someone who regards the rest of humanity as "the
> > collective,"
> 
> Check that ego, sparky, because you're not the
> rest of humanity.
> 
> And *I* speak empirically.
> 
> You can't admit the truth about Darwin. You won't.
> 
> YOU DIDN'T.
> 
> > Darwin and evolution aside
> 
> No. No "aside." You steadfastly refused to accept
> the truth about Darwin. You're reflecting reality
> now, trying to make it about me.
> 
> 
The atheists here have all accepted the truth about Darwin.  He was a great and thorough scientist who discovered how evolution works.

It is you and a couple other idiots who do not accept these truths.
> 
> 
> -- --
> 
> http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/151186873697
> 
>  is this JTEM response him admitting he's a
> > needy narcisst?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2177679

FromJTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-05 23:42 -0700
Message-ID<8f8348d7-64f8-42ea-9775-3f7c1086e7f9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#2177575
 Cloud Hobbit wrote:
 
> The atheists

There are no atheists here. 

Atheists believe there is no God(s). You are not
an atheist.






-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/151372096804

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175402

Frombilgat@m.nu
Date2016-09-30 11:25 -0500
Message-ID<3a4tub903cs7btckp0p7f3ljsmm4kt47lk@4ax.com>
In reply to#2175017
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:27:53 -0700 (PDT), JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>Attention, collective:
>
>Okay, so JTEM is the only voice in opposition
>to the brain damaged guy, but what other
>"Proof" do you have that JTEM is wrong? What,


Careful you are going to give me an ego. The fact that you are so
threatened by me tells me that you idolize me. You have mentioned me
several times now, which means that you are in awe by this I have
said, and the fact that you keep mentioning the same thing my brain
injury just tells me you are 1 a complete moron and 2 you are a
complete moron

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2175454

FromJTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-30 11:40 -0700
Message-ID<b541166c-e2b2-425a-8179-1cf4c29f10a3@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#2175402
 bil...@m.nu wrote:
 
> Careful

You imagine yourself to be above the Young
Earth Creationists, yet you defend myths in
the most hostile terms possible.




-- --

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/78640402336

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism

csiph-web