Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #1921087 > unrolled thread
| Started by | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-09 14:56 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-06-22 22:19 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 265 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-09 14:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-10 00:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-10 12:10 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 11:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-10 18:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-11 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-12 04:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-12 20:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. hhyapster@gmail.com - 2015-06-12 19:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-12 19:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-13 13:37 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 14:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-14 09:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-14 16:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-14 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-12 20:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 03:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-13 07:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-13 09:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 05:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-13 12:25 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 07:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 13:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 14:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 21:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-14 09:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 13:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 14:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 21:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 05:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 09:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-14 15:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 07:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-15 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 15:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 23:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 06:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 13:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-16 22:35 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-16 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 14:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-17 23:47 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-17 19:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-18 19:17 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-18 21:42 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-18 15:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-19 06:29 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-18 20:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 06:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-20 08:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:23 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-21 14:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:03 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:20 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. history <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-20 18:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-20 18:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:05 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:07 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. G hitlug <dontmailme@illmail.you> - 2015-06-22 11:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 07:33 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-20 11:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-21 17:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-06-21 17:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-20 12:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 13:21 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Joe Bruno <joebruno86@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 04:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 16:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 10:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-20 08:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 19:46 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-22 00:42 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-17 18:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-17 20:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-18 02:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-18 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 09:00 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 10:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-21 09:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-19 18:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 06:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 11:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 14:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-20 19:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 23:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 06:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 12:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 10:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:34 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Everest Hollyworth <everesthollyworth1989@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 01:49 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 07:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 06:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 08:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-19 14:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 15:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 10:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 14:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-16 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-16 14:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-16 19:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 07:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-19 20:22 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-19 06:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-19 05:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 06:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Marvin Sebourn <osugeography@aol.com> - 2015-06-19 12:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 15:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 10:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 14:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-22 13:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-22 22:19 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 18:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-22 21:51 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-14 07:49 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-14 15:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-15 22:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Marvin Sebourn <osugeography@aol.com> - 2015-06-16 11:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-13 22:40 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-13 10:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-14 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-15 07:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-10 12:16 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 11:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 10:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-10 23:13 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-11 11:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-11 20:45 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-13 22:50 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-14 15:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-15 07:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-15 08:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-15 13:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-15 16:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-16 19:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-17 18:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-18 19:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Robert Weldon" <roborat13@hotmail.com> - 2015-06-17 12:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-18 07:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-15 21:43 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-15 23:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-16 12:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 14:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 00:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 19:20 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 21:33 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-19 07:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 07:17 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-17 00:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-16 18:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 19:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-17 14:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 23:41 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-17 23:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mattb. <Trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 23:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-18 02:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-18 11:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-17 19:28 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-18 06:12 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-17 22:36 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-17 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-18 22:43 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-19 20:10 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 06:57 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-21 09:14 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-22 09:27 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 14:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 21:59 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 13:55 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 17:05 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-22 19:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. G hitlug <dontmailme@illmail.you> - 2015-06-22 11:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-22 21:57 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-19 20:13 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-19 06:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 07:03 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-21 09:18 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 14:01 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 21:30 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:25 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 14:10 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 21:57 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-18 01:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 02:29 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-19 21:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:54 -0500
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 00:23 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 06:24 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. Jane@home.. - 2015-06-20 21:05 +1000
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 07:31 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-06-20 05:50 -0700
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 09:41 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. Jane@home.. - 2015-06-21 09:46 +1000
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 07:05 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-20 05:24 -0700
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 08:29 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 12:07 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-06-22 07:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 21:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-22 22:19 +0200
Page 3 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 14 Next page →
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-15 23:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <VCMfx.233170$_o7.78284@fx05.iad> |
| In reply to | #1925403 |
On 06/15/2015 03:07 PM, HVAC wrote:
> On 6/15/2015 3:00 PM, duke wrote:
>>
>>>>> I categorically deny the existence of gods
>>>>
>>>> Cool, but you can't support that denial.
>>
>>> Of course I can.
>>
>> Then go for it.
>
>
> I just did.
>
>
To Harlow just saying something is all the "support" he needs. As God of
the universe and knower of all things, his saying something is proof
enough that it is true.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-16 06:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mlou1t$6h0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1925636 |
On 6/15/2015 11:21 PM, benj wrote: > >>>>>> I categorically deny the existence of gods >>>>> >>>>> Cool, but you can't support that denial. >>> >>>> Of course I can. >>> >>> Then go for it. >> >> >> I just did. >> >> > To Harlow just saying something is all the "support" he needs. As God of > the universe and knower of all things, his saying something is proof > enough that it is true. I provided EXACTLY the same amount of evidence as do you and your butt buddy, Duke, for your beliefs in god, ESP and remote viewing. I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning! It smells like...Victory. -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-16 13:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <xbZfx.1$C_.0@fx15.iad> |
| In reply to | #1925765 |
On 06/16/2015 06:35 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On 6/15/2015 11:21 PM, benj wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> I categorically deny the existence of gods
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cool, but you can't support that denial.
>>>>
>>>>> Of course I can.
>>>>
>>>> Then go for it.
>>>
>>>
>>> I just did.
>>>
>>>
>> To Harlow just saying something is all the "support" he needs. As God of
>> the universe and knower of all things, his saying something is proof
>> enough that it is true.
>
>
> I provided EXACTLY the same amount of evidence as do you and your butt
> buddy, Duke, for your beliefs in god, ESP and remote viewing.
>
> I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning!
>
> It smells like...Victory.
>
Victory? Smells like plagiarism to me. Whatsamatta? Losing word skills
in your old age so you have to steal my words? Can't come up with an
equivalent "butt-buddy" on your own? And then applying your tradecraft,
you accuse me of stealing "breathless"? You are slipping Harlow. Are
you retired or were you fired? (Fired is also called "retired" in
gummint circles)
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-16 22:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5580887d$0$23223$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #1925636 |
"benj" skrev i meddelelsen news:VCMfx.233170$_o7.78284@fx05.iad... > > On 06/15/2015 03:07 PM, HVAC wrote: > > On 6/15/2015 3:00 PM, duke wrote: > >> > >>>>> I categorically deny the existence of gods > >>>> > >>>> Cool, but you can't support that denial. > >> > >>> Of course I can. > >> > >> Then go for it. > > > > > > I just did. > > > > > To Harlow just saying something is all the "support" he needs. ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial "Denial, in ordinary English usage, is asserting that a statement or allegation is not true." The key word is "asserting". You don't need 'support' for your denial, and it isn't about whether the denial is justified or not. > ... As God of the universe and knower of all things, his saying something > is proof enough that it is true. "Asserting", remember. -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-16 12:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hjo0oal7d1mtasp7mu16vlq8tc6tc6hfrl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1925403 |
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:07:02 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >On 6/15/2015 3:00 PM, duke wrote: >> >>>>> I categorically deny the existence of gods >>>> >>>> Cool, but you can't support that denial. >> >>> Of course I can. >> >> Then go for it. > > >I just did. But based on what? You have no evidence. That means all you can do is classify the evidence that people like me have as not believed by you, and hence you are an agnostic. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-16 14:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mlpq48$nna$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1925937 |
On 6/16/2015 1:53 PM, duke wrote: > >> I just did. > > But based on what? You have no evidence. That means all you can do is classify > the evidence that people like me have as not believed by you, and hence you are > an agnostic. I am exactly as much an agnostic as are YOU, Duker -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 15:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2ql3oalkvlo9ldcek0a0qee8sn7ph9nrss@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1925955 |
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:34:14 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >On 6/16/2015 1:53 PM, duke wrote: >> >>> I just did. >> >> But based on what? You have no evidence. That means all you can do is classify >> the evidence that people like me have as not believed by you, and hence you are >> an agnostic. > > >I am exactly as much an agnostic as are YOU, Duker I believe in God thru faith supported now by logic and reason. What logic and reason do you have for there being NO God almighty? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 23:47 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5581eae4$0$23235$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #1926469 |
"duke" skrev i meddelelsen news:2ql3oalkvlo9ldcek0a0qee8sn7ph9nrss@4ax.com... > > On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:34:14 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On 6/16/2015 1:53 PM, duke wrote: > >> > >>> I just did. > >> > >> But based on what? You have no evidence. That means all you can do is > >> classify > >> the evidence that people like me have as not believed by you, and hence > >> you are > >> an agnostic. > > > > > >I am exactly as much an agnostic as are YOU, Duker > > I believe in God thru faith supported now by logic and reason. Logic? Reason??? You have a book full of myths and whispers in your heart. That hardly counts for logic and reason. > > What logic and reason do you have for there being NO God almighty? What logic and reason do you have for there being NO F#17? What is it you don't understand about 'proving a negative'? You're hemorrhaging points every time you ask that question. It shows, with all clearity, that you have NOT understood basic principles of logic, and that you have yet again failed to reason. -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 19:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mlt3ab$96g$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1926532 |
On 6/17/2015 4:47 PM, Malte Runz wrote: > "duke" skrev i meddelelsen > news:2ql3oalkvlo9ldcek0a0qee8sn7ph9nrss@4ax.com... >> >> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:34:14 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On 6/16/2015 1:53 PM, duke wrote: >> >> >> >>> I just did. >> >> >> >> But based on what? You have no evidence. That means all you can >> do is >> classify >> >> the evidence that people like me have as not believed by you, and >> hence >> you are >> >> an agnostic. >> > >> > >> >I am exactly as much an agnostic as are YOU, Duker >> >> I believe in God thru faith supported now by logic and reason. > > Logic? Reason??? You have a book full of myths and whispers in your > heart. That hardly counts for logic and reason. > >> >> What logic and reason do you have for there being NO God almighty? > > What logic and reason do you have for there being NO F#17? > > What is it you don't understand about 'proving a negative'? You're > hemorrhaging points every time you ask that question. It shows, with all > clearity, that you have NOT understood basic principles of logic, and > that you have yet again failed to reason. you believe in God or not ? simple, yes or no
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 19:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mlv5fm$1jn$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1926604 |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:27:46 -0500, Sesiom wrote: > On 6/17/2015 4:47 PM, Malte Runz wrote: >> "duke" skrev i meddelelsen >> news:2ql3oalkvlo9ldcek0a0qee8sn7ph9nrss@4ax.com... >>> >>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:34:14 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >On 6/16/2015 1:53 PM, duke wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> I just did. >>> >> >>> >> But based on what? You have no evidence. That means all you can >>> do is >> classify >>> >> the evidence that people like me have as not believed by you, and >>> hence >> you are >>> >> an agnostic. >>> > >>> > >>> >I am exactly as much an agnostic as are YOU, Duker >>> >>> I believe in God thru faith supported now by logic and reason. >> >> Logic? Reason??? You have a book full of myths and whispers in your >> heart. That hardly counts for logic and reason. >> >> >>> What logic and reason do you have for there being NO God almighty? > > >> What logic and reason do you have for there being NO F#17? >> >> What is it you don't understand about 'proving a negative'? You're >> hemorrhaging points every time you ask that question. It shows, with >> all clearity, that you have NOT understood basic principles of logic, >> and that you have yet again failed to reason. > > you believe in God or not ? simple, yes or no Do you know what an atheist is? simple, yes or no. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 21:42 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <55831f1f$0$23218$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #1926970 |
"Smiler" skrev i meddelelsen news:mlv5fm$1jn$1@speranza.aioe.org... > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:27:46 -0500, Sesiom wrote: > > > On 6/17/2015 4:47 PM, Malte Runz wrote: > >> "duke" skrev i meddelelsen > >> news:2ql3oalkvlo9ldcek0a0qee8sn7ph9nrss@4ax.com... > >>> > >>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:34:14 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> >On 6/16/2015 1:53 PM, duke wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >>> I just did. > >>> >> > >>> >> But based on what? You have no evidence. That means all you can > >>> do is >> classify > >>> >> the evidence that people like me have as not believed by you, and > >>> hence >> you are > >>> >> an agnostic. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >I am exactly as much an agnostic as are YOU, Duker > >>> > >>> I believe in God thru faith supported now by logic and reason. > >> > >> Logic? Reason??? You have a book full of myths and whispers in your > >> heart. That hardly counts for logic and reason. > >> > >> > >>> What logic and reason do you have for there being NO God almighty? > > > > > >> What logic and reason do you have for there being NO F#17? > >> > >> What is it you don't understand about 'proving a negative'? You're > >> hemorrhaging points every time you ask that question. It shows, with > >> all clearity, that you have NOT understood basic principles of logic, > >> and that you have yet again failed to reason. (piggybacking) > > you believe in God or not ? simple, yes or no No. > > Do you know what an atheist is? simple, yes or no. 'It's a person who knows that God exists but denies His existence'? -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 15:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <f496oadjup6jh7fv9p0qjav5feai077pd8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1926970 |
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:17:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:27:46 -0500, Sesiom wrote: > >> On 6/17/2015 4:47 PM, Malte Runz wrote: >>> "duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>> news:2ql3oalkvlo9ldcek0a0qee8sn7ph9nrss@4ax.com... >>>> >>>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:34:14 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >On 6/16/2015 1:53 PM, duke wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> I just did. >>>> >> >>>> >> But based on what? You have no evidence. That means all you can >>>> do is >> classify >>>> >> the evidence that people like me have as not believed by you, and >>>> hence >> you are >>>> >> an agnostic. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >I am exactly as much an agnostic as are YOU, Duker >>>> >>>> I believe in God thru faith supported now by logic and reason. >>> >>> Logic? Reason??? You have a book full of myths and whispers in your >>> heart. That hardly counts for logic and reason. >>> >>> >>>> What logic and reason do you have for there being NO God almighty? >> >> >>> What logic and reason do you have for there being NO F#17? >>> >>> What is it you don't understand about 'proving a negative'? You're >>> hemorrhaging points every time you ask that question. It shows, with >>> all clearity, that you have NOT understood basic principles of logic, >>> and that you have yet again failed to reason. >> >> you believe in God or not ? simple, yes or no in order for someone to "believe" in a god you must first have faith that things can exist which are beyond science and beyond the rational. You can not pick and choose specific things you must believe that it all exists, all irrational things I mean. So for one to believe in a god and god or gods one must first admit to himself that all things irrational can, do, and will happen. So a belief in a god also mean that you believe that Hogwarts is a real place, that somewhere on earth timkerbell and peter pan are frolicking in a forest and that gandalf is somewhere making more fireworks for the hobbits now that mount doom has been destroyed, you also believe in all the greek, roman, norse, egyptian gods all exist or once existed. You have no choice you must believe it all or believe none. So you must ask yourself just how much faith do you have????? > >Do you know what an atheist is? simple, yes or no. I think they got stuck on the word Do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-19 06:29 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <eca6oa57kl2i6bldhbjgjvelto4bgi2ijo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1926970 |
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:17:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:27:46 -0500, Sesiom wrote: >Do you know what an atheist is? simple, yes or no. An atheist is the imaginary thing religious nuts check for under their beds every night. __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 16:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <eke6oa9o2f2cumdi9r6v9ni4bupnmvljvq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1926532 |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:47:20 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >news:2ql3oalkvlo9ldcek0a0qee8sn7ph9nrss@4ax.com... >> >> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:34:14 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On 6/16/2015 1:53 PM, duke wrote: >> >> >> >>> I just did. >> >> >> >> But based on what? You have no evidence. That means all you can do is >> >> classify >> >> the evidence that people like me have as not believed by you, and hence >> >> you are >> >> an agnostic. >> > >> > >> >I am exactly as much an agnostic as are YOU, Duker >> >> I believe in God thru faith supported now by logic and reason. > >Logic? Reason??? You have a book full of myths and whispers in your heart. >That hardly counts for logic and reason. Who says they are myths but you? I see God's message revealed to man and you don't. Do you believe the fable that God is just a myth? >> What logic and reason do you have for there being NO God almighty? >What logic and reason do you have for there being NO F#17? I have no evidence for F#17. I gather you do. Why not give me some of your evidence for my consideration. >What is it you don't understand about 'proving a negative'? You're >hemorrhaging points every time you ask that question. It shows, with all >clearity, that you have NOT understood basic principles of logic, and that >you have yet again failed to reason. Logic and reason demand that we and nothing would be here without the hand of God almighty. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 20:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hmr6oatg1heh21tr37lkshl5atcn8c5h3f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1927053 |
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:43:02 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:47:20 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: > >>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>news:2ql3oalkvlo9ldcek0a0qee8sn7ph9nrss@4ax.com... >>> >>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:34:14 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >On 6/16/2015 1:53 PM, duke wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> I just did. >>> >> >>> >> But based on what? You have no evidence. That means all you can do is >>> >> classify >>> >> the evidence that people like me have as not believed by you, and hence >>> >> you are >>> >> an agnostic. >>> > >>> > >>> >I am exactly as much an agnostic as are YOU, Duker >>> >>> I believe in God thru faith supported now by logic and reason. >> >>Logic? Reason??? You have a book full of myths and whispers in your heart. >>That hardly counts for logic and reason. > >Who says they are myths but you? I see God's message revealed to man and you >don't. Do you believe the fable that God is just a myth? The cathylick religon says it you worthless freak > >>What is it you don't understand about 'proving a negative'? You're >>hemorrhaging points every time you ask that question. It shows, with all >>clearity, that you have NOT understood basic principles of logic, and that >>you have yet again failed to reason. > >Logic and reason demand that we and nothing would be here without the hand of >God almighty. OOOHH YEAH YOU TELL HIM HORSE DOOKIE!!!!!! Since when is harry freakin potter logical???? dukie pooper you are a worthless ball of lard that needs to leave this earth so it can one day be beautiful again!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-19 06:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mm0qc4$2vf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1927053 |
On 6/18/2015 5:43 PM, duke wrote: > > Logic and reason demand that we and nothing would be here without the hand of > God almighty. I'd ask if that was the reality, who then created your god? But I know you will just recite an answer you read in Gay Catholic Weekly, and I have grown bored with your trite and fallacious replies. -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-19 13:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <alo8oahc3vllkgsmk8qh2irfpujcinpmok@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1927340 |
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 06:21:50 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >On 6/18/2015 5:43 PM, duke wrote: >> >> Logic and reason demand that we and nothing would be here without the hand of >> God almighty. > > >I'd ask if that was the reality, who then created your god? I repeat my same answer - I don't have a clue. >But I know you will just recite an answer you read in Gay Catholic >Weekly, and I have grown bored with your trite and fallacious replies. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-19 19:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mm1s99$7ga$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1927553 |
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 13:43:12 -0500, duke wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 06:21:50 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 6/18/2015 5:43 PM, duke wrote: >>> >>> Logic and reason demand that we and nothing would be here without the >>> hand of God almighty. >> >> >>I'd ask if that was the reality, who then created your god? > > I repeat my same answer - I don't have a clue. You don't have, and never have had, a clue about anything, ball-on-a- string puke. >>But I know you will just recite an answer you read in Gay Catholic >>Weekly, and I have grown bored with your trite and fallacious replies. He has nothing else. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-20 09:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rpvaoahuui7msqc6elpfis8gf09dnobki0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1927611 |
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:58:33 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 13:43:12 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 06:21:50 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>On 6/18/2015 5:43 PM, duke wrote: >>>> >>>> Logic and reason demand that we and nothing would be here without the >>>> hand of God almighty. >>> >>> >>>I'd ask if that was the reality, who then created your god? >> >> I repeat my same answer - I don't have a clue. > >You don't have, and never have had, a clue about anything, ball-on-a- >string puke. A ball on a string does not rotate. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-20 08:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mm3vfb21q85@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #1928203 |
On 06/20/2015 07:57 AM, duke wrote: > A ball on a string does not rotate. Rotates once per revolution, and also the centerline of the ball translates in x and y.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web