Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2063133 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-03 06:59 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 137 — 33 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Greywolf <greywolftheatheist@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 15:25 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:26 -0700
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:32 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 18:36 -0700
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 02:52 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-02-21 19:16 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mattb. <trdell1234@outlook.com> - 2016-02-21 19:28 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-22 01:14 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mattb. <trdell1234@outlook.com> - 2016-02-22 02:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-22 17:55 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mattb. <trdell1234@outlook.com> - 2016-02-22 18:08 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-24 00:20 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 11:51 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-24 00:23 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 11:43 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 21:46 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-20 19:45 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 18:49 -0700
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 13:53 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 13:52 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-02-21 19:31 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-24 23:23 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-20 19:43 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 18:47 -0700
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-02-21 19:21 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 20:24 -0700
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-22 00:48 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-02-23 00:34 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-02-22 06:16 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:46 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-02-23 12:44 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 12:11 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-02-25 12:53 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-02-26 02:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-28 22:48 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-29 23:44 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-01 11:21 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-01 20:40 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 12:11 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 12:11 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 17:06 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 16:20 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 00:47 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 17:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-02-20 17:28 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 02:49 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Greywolf <greywolftheatheist@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 12:30 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 18:42 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 12:38 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 18:45 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 19:13 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 20:28 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 21:56 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-22 08:54 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 02:55 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 03:42 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:32 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 12:41 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-21 18:45 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 20:20 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:27 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-22 17:57 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-02-23 00:42 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 20:08 -0800
[OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:15 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? default <default@defaulter.net> - 2016-02-29 10:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 11:04 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-29 23:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-02-29 18:05 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:55 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:11 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:45 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:27 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-03 00:40 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? default <default@defaulter.net> - 2016-03-03 15:29 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-23 14:12 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 17:11 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 22:03 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-23 15:49 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 21:58 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:33 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-02-23 00:38 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:35 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-02-22 09:09 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 03:33 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 20:21 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 18:20 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-23 12:43 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 12:56 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-24 00:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-02-24 13:12 +0100
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. default <default@defaulter.net> - 2016-02-24 08:32 -0500
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 11:30 +1100
WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 17:18 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-02 21:10 -0500
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:18 -0700
WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 19:54 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:36 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-03-02 23:14 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:52 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:45 +1100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0400
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-02 23:56 -0500
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:46 +1100
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-03 19:55 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-24 04:18 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-25 02:49 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:53 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 23:33 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 21:23 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-24 23:34 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 18:40 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:56 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:58 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-26 19:08 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-25 02:53 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:55 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:59 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-02-26 03:33 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 08:56 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:46 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 14:16 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 12:25 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 23:21 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:02 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 08:07 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 10:02 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:38 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 12:00 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:55 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-02-26 19:10 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 20:14 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-03 06:59 -0800
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-23 15:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <naigeu$8ll$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2063578 |
The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> Bast wrote: >>> >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>> If you ask people >>>> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >>>> You either going to get >>>> a Yes or No answer. >>>> >>> >>> Most certainly,.... I exist. >> >> oh, oh...another 'think therefore, must be an I there somewhere'. >> >> Who is "I"? >> >> "I" doesn't exist..."I" is an illusion...a virtual person. >> >> There is no proof that an "I" exist. >> >> Therefore...I don't think. > > > Atheist claim that God is a imaginary person...suppose that's true? > > God could be imagining He is God. > > > God is probably saying right now..."I think, therefore I'm am. No,...I'm wondering what I should cook for dinner after work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-21 21:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1557829d-fba4-433c-b747-3806cee76c76@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2063538 |
On Sunday, February 21, 2016 at 11:32:39 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > Bast wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > If you ask people > > > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > > > You either going to get > > > a Yes or No answer. > > > > > > > Most certainly,.... I exist. > > > > oh, oh...another 'think therefore, must be an I there somewhere'. > > > > Who is "I"? > > > "I" doesn't exist..."I" is an illusion...a virtual person. > > > There is no proof that an "I" exist. > > > Therefore...I don't think. We believe you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-23 06:33 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <nag25v$k3i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2063344 |
On 2/21/2016 4:42 PM, Bast wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> If you ask people >> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >> You either going to get >> a Yes or No answer. >> > > > Most certainly,.... I exist. > > Why not ask: Is there someone watching your back? :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 06:27:01 up 6 days 13:21 0 users load average: 1.00 1.02 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-23 00:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <730e6532-6c90-47f3-8c57-a42777fbbca1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2063344 |
On Sunday, February 21, 2016 at 3:42:08 AM UTC-5, Bast wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: > > If you ask people > > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > > You either going to get > > a Yes or No answer. > > > > > Most certainly,.... I exist. Meow?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-21 11:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56CA1192.13A5@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2063133 |
benj wrote: > > On 02/20/2016 06:23 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 2/20/16 5:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >> If you ask people > >> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > > > > > > > > The concept og gods is an invention on man. > > And the way you know this is? Ah, you've borrowed some "superpowers" > from HVAC again. > > How about acting like you actually know some science and ask Starfaker > to define exactly what he means by "a God", before you flap your yap > about it? Ask HVAC to join the conversation and you'll have a perfect > trio of ignorance and atheist bluster. somethings are known about God... like for example, He dosesn't play dice. but, i'm not sure what language He speaks...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 09:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <naf4ku$qv1$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2063133 |
"Yes, NOW there is a God."
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-23 03:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nagjtp$oir$21@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2063133 |
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:14:26 -0800, The Starmaker wrote: > If you ask people "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > You either going to get a Yes or No answer. That would depend on which of the 30,000+ gods known to have been worshipped by mankind you're talking about. Certainly some of them are know to (have) exist(ed). > The answer is either Yes or No. Maybe. > But...if you ask God the same question.. Logical error of assuming your conclusion. If there isn't a god, how could you do that? -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 20:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56CBDE41.FAC@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2064353 |
Smiler wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:14:26 -0800, The Starmaker wrote: > > > If you ask people "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > > You either going to get a Yes or No answer. > > That would depend on which of the 30,000+ gods known to have been > worshipped by mankind you're talking about. Certainly some of them are > know to (have) exist(ed). > > > The answer is either Yes or No. > > Maybe. > > > But...if you ask God the same question.. > > Logical error of assuming your conclusion. > If there isn't a god, how could you do that? "If"???? you don't sound too sure...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-23 18:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nai7th$1qsm$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2064363 |
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:21:21 -0800, The Starmaker wrote: > Smiler wrote: >> >> On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:14:26 -0800, The Starmaker wrote: >> >> > If you ask people "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >> > You either going to get a Yes or No answer. >> >> That would depend on which of the 30,000+ gods known to have been >> worshipped by mankind you're talking about. Certainly some of them are >> know to (have) exist(ed). >> >> > The answer is either Yes or No. >> >> Maybe. >> >> > But...if you ask God the same question.. >> >> Logical error of assuming your conclusion. >> If there isn't a god, how could you do that? > > "If"???? you don't sound too sure... There's at least one proven-to-be-existent claimed god that one could ask. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-23 12:43 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <e0apcbp1lnlnaeliq7h30e27j3kigcsrmq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2064622 |
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:20:33 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:21:21 -0800, The Starmaker wrote: > >> Smiler wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:14:26 -0800, The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> > If you ask people "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >>> > You either going to get a Yes or No answer. >>> >>> That would depend on which of the 30,000+ gods known to have been >>> worshipped by mankind you're talking about. Certainly some of them are >>> know to (have) exist(ed). >>> >>> > The answer is either Yes or No. >>> >>> Maybe. >>> >>> > But...if you ask God the same question.. >>> >>> Logical error of assuming your conclusion. >>> If there isn't a god, how could you do that? >> >> "If"???? you don't sound too sure... Whata a fucking moron. >There's at least one proven-to-be-existent claimed god that one could ask. It was just being its usual asshole self.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 12:56 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dj4gu7Frb8dU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2063133 |
On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > If you ask people > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > You either going to get > a Yes or No answer. > > The answer is either Yes or No. > > But...if you ask God the same question.. > > His answer would be... > > > "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." > > God would say, "It's not that black and white..." > Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but not God? Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 00:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56CD642B.7970@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2064873 |
Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > If you ask people > > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > > You either going to get > > a Yes or No answer. > > > > The answer is either Yes or No. > > > > But...if you ask God the same question.. > > > > His answer would be... > > > > > > "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." > > > > God would say, "It's not that black and white..." > > > > Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but > not God? > > Sylvia. zeros and ones, off and on...yes or no are people concepts. God exist in both states at the same time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dj5kg2F52qqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2064967 |
On 24/02/2016 7:04 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Sylvia Else wrote: >> >> On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> If you ask people >>> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >>> You either going to get >>> a Yes or No answer. >>> >>> The answer is either Yes or No. >>> >>> But...if you ask God the same question.. >>> >>> His answer would be... >>> >>> >>> "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." >>> >>> God would say, "It's not that black and white..." >>> >> >> Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but >> not God? >> >> Sylvia. > > > zeros and ones, off and on...yes or no are people concepts. > > > God exist in both states at the same time. > That isn't really an answer. If people would reply yes or no anyway, then you'll get the same answer with or without the constraint, making the constraint redundant. Essentially, you're proposing to ask people and God different questions, and then you're remarking on the anticipated difference in the answers. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 13:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tf7rcb9qr646oujfp3ou6peec2rnpjpjm7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2065023 |
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:03:11 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: >On 24/02/2016 7:04 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Sylvia Else wrote: >>> >>> On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> If you ask people >>>> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >>>> You either going to get >>>> a Yes or No answer. >>>> >>>> The answer is either Yes or No. >>>> >>>> But...if you ask God the same question.. >>>> >>>> His answer would be... >>>> YES. I am here. Why do you ask, my son? w.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | default <default@defaulter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 08:32 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. |
| Message-ID | <84crcbhq6sh2rc0va2c18bm1qj8aq2ee0c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2065023 |
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 04:31:01 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote: > >Mr. Starmaker wrote: >> > > > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >> > >> > God exist in both states at the same time. > >Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug; >a painkiller/aphrodisiac. > >Schrödinger doesn't know if his cat is dead or alive; >his ignorance doesn't, can't, alter reality. > >Ignorance is not a spatial dimension, >as string theory would have you believe. > >Hallucinations are just that, hallucinations, >not "alternate realities/universes", >as pop science would have you believe. > Mr. Starmaker wrote: > > > > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > > > > God exist in both states at the same time. Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug; a painkiller/aphrodisiac. Schrödinger doesn't know if his cat is dead or alive; his ignorance doesn't, can't, alter reality. Ignorance is not a spatial dimension, as string theory would have you believe. Hallucinations are just that, hallucinations, not "alternate realities/universes", as pop science would have you believe. Hardly "cheap." Untold suffering, wars, denial, mental retardation, abused children, misappropriated funding, etc. etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 11:30 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. |
| Message-ID | <djpes9F8dflU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2065023 |
On 24/02/2016 11:31 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > Mr. Starmaker wrote: > > > > > "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > > > > > > God exist in both states at the same time. > > Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug; > a painkiller/aphrodisiac. > > Schrödinger doesn't know if his cat is dead or alive; > his ignorance doesn't, can't, alter reality. > > Ignorance is not a spatial dimension, > as string theory would have you believe. > > Hallucinations are just that, hallucinations, > not "alternate realities/universes", > as pop science would have you believe. > > You do realise that formatted text in Usenet marks you out as a crank, and many people won't go beyond seeing that the text is formatted before closing the posting? Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 17:18 -0800 |
| Subject | WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.2{5.18P.Seattle.2016}> |
| In reply to | #2069058 |
You (Sylvia Else) told me (Jeff Relf): > You do realise that formatted text[?!] in Usenet > marks you out as a crank, and many people won't go beyond > seeing that the text is formatted before closing the posting? The HMTL markup I post is just: <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'> It's very, very simple. WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweight_markup_language You might want to look up the word "crank" because I don't think you're using it correctly. No matter, feel free to ignore me, my feelings won't be hurt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 21:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <p67fdblla09k8h3irhvjndmqv18hbksens@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2069087 |
On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 17:18:27 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>You (Sylvia Else) told me (Jeff Relf):
>> You do realise that formatted text[?!] in Usenet
>> marks you out as a crank, and many people won't go beyond
>> seeing that the text is formatted before closing the posting?
>
>The HMTL markup I post is just:
>
> <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'>
>
>It's very, very simple.
>WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML):
Neither one is Usenet, though.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 20:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <Y1OBy.43052$Io5.16941@fx12.iad> |
| In reply to | #2069087 |
On 3/2/2016 6:18 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: <snip> > > It's very, very simple. > WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML): > Neither of which are _Usenet_. Usenet is mainly consumed by people who still use ASCII-only newsreaders (personally, my Thunderbird is *capable* of more, but there are people in here on PINE!). Thus, you _do not format anything_. If you want to use ellipsis, you use three separate periods. If you want to use an en-dash, you use two separate hyphens. And you're gonna get plonked by more people than will ever open another posting of yours if you don't follow those rules *always*. -- Chrysi Cat 1/2 anthrocat, nearly 1/2 anthrofox, all magical Transgoddess, quick to anger Call me Chrysi or call me Kat, I'll respond to either!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 19:54 -0800 |
| Subject | WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.2{7.54P.Seattle.2016}> |
| In reply to | #2069147 |
You (Chrysi Cat) replied (to me): > > The HMTL markup I post is just: > > > > <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'> > > > > It's very, very simple. > > WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML): > > Neither of which are _Usenet_. > > Usenet is mainly consumed by people who still use ASCII-only newsreaders > (personally, my Thunderbird is *capable* of more, but there are people > in here on PINE!). Usenet allows for it, same as email, to wit, my: "Content-Type: text/html". You want something else ? Go fuck yourself, I don't care.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web