Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2080742 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-27 04:12 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-04-05 09:05 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 344 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:12 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:30 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:41 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-29 17:28 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:53 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:35 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:07 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:22 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:41 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 10:56 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:08 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 14:59 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:02 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:45 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:07 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:38 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:20 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:51 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:01 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:31 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 17:38 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 18:00 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 18:20 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 19:49 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 02:51 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 02:24 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 14:13 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:45 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 02:29 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 11:50 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 13:41 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 14:54 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:06 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:34 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-13 10:17 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 05:07 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-14 17:23 +0000
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 17:19 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 17:16 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-15 23:01 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-10 09:37 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 04:02 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:43 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 10:58 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-02 15:43 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-02 16:26 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-02 20:01 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:26 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 08:53 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:27 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:10 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-03 16:43 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-03 18:32 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 04:16 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-04 04:32 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-04 05:01 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-04 08:58 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:03 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-04 15:41 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 04:22 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 07:41 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-04 11:22 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-04 11:23 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:06 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-04 15:33 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-04 18:07 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-04 18:03 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-04 21:27 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-05 12:32 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-05 18:51 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 04:26 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 07:37 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 04:24 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 13:35 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-04 15:15 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:05 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 12:59 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:10 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 07:30 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:06 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 10:59 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:47 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-07 06:44 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:21 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:09 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-08 06:08 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 14:06 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:40 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 08:08 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:22 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-10 07:06 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:53 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 14:57 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 15:10 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:11 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:44 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:36 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 08:01 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-13 10:19 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:49 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 05:10 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 12:20 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 17:10 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-15 16:45 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-15 23:05 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-16 09:46 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-16 16:40 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-16 15:54 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-17 10:10 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-17 19:13 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-18 17:37 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-18 23:06 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-19 11:48 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-19 14:20 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-19 13:27 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-20 11:32 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-21 14:56 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-21 14:42 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-21 16:43 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-22 10:04 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-22 15:29 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 04:18 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-23 07:15 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-23 08:29 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 15:14 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-24 10:50 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-24 16:56 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 17:08 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 02:56 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-27 10:59 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 16:08 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-27 15:47 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 18:46 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:40 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 18:54 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:38 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:25 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:17 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-30 14:30 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 10:50 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:37 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 14:13 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:38 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 13:57 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 09:54 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:37 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 18:56 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-23 08:27 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 15:15 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-24 10:50 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-24 16:57 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 17:09 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 02:58 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-27 10:59 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 16:09 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:41 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 18:57 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:39 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:27 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:18 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-30 14:31 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-21 16:43 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-22 10:06 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-22 15:30 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 04:19 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-23 08:30 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 15:16 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-24 10:51 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-24 16:59 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 17:10 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 02:59 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-27 11:04 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 16:12 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:46 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:01 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:41 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:30 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:21 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-30 14:33 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 10:52 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-05-01 12:09 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:27 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-01 17:09 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:28 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-17 10:07 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-17 19:16 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-18 17:40 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-18 23:10 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-19 11:50 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-19 14:22 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-20 11:32 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-21 14:57 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-21 16:44 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-22 10:08 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-22 15:31 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 04:20 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-23 08:31 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 15:18 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-24 10:51 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-24 17:00 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 17:10 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 02:59 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-27 11:04 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 16:14 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:48 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:02 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:41 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:31 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:21 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-30 14:34 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 10:53 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-01 17:11 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:29 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-13 18:44 +0200
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:52 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-13 23:33 +0200
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 12:21 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-15 23:53 +0200
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 08:19 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 14:15 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-16 16:40 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-05 12:07 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-06 01:34 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:00 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-06 10:19 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-03 12:28 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:15 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:02 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:12 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 07:32 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-04 15:46 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-04 16:03 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 07:34 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 07:33 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-03 18:36 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:03 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:16 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:14 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:07 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:48 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:12 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:46 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:27 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 14:59 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:16 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:39 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-13 10:22 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 05:14 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 17:13 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-15 23:07 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 08:20 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-16 16:44 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-17 19:19 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-18 23:16 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-19 14:24 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-21 15:00 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-22 10:13 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-22 15:29 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 04:26 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-23 08:19 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 15:19 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-24 17:02 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 17:07 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 03:02 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-27 10:57 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 16:15 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:33 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:03 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:32 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:31 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-30 14:35 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-01 17:12 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 14:09 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 09:29 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 09:37 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 10:16 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 16:06 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 16:14 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 16:00 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 17:08 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 18:04 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 18:38 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 20:08 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 02:49 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:35 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 02:43 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-21 11:11 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-21 12:54 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 13:31 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 14:23 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 17:38 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 18:24 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 02:42 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-22 10:11 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-22 15:28 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 04:23 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-23 07:11 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-23 08:18 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 15:22 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-24 10:45 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-24 17:06 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 16:57 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 03:04 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-27 10:55 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 16:17 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:31 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:05 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:29 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:33 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-30 14:36 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-01 17:13 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:24 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 17:03 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 16:55 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-04-26 20:46 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:30 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 15:20 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-23 08:16 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-23 15:24 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-24 10:47 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-24 17:13 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 17:05 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 03:06 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-27 10:56 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 16:20 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:33 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:07 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:31 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:35 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-30 14:37 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-01 17:16 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:25 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-18 23:14 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-19 10:44 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-10 09:50 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-10 10:33 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 15:14 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-10 18:51 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:49 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:42 -0500
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-03 22:46 +0000
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-04 14:34 -0400
Re: "Information" Evidence of a Super Intelligent Creator Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:05 -0400
Page 2 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 18 Next page →
| From | Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 17:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <46d7d4e8-b7b4-45c3-8996-24444579b821@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2088541 |
On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 6:31:29 PM UTC-4, % wrote: > Tim wrote: > > On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:06:13 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:41:14 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>> <0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> > >>>>>>> in > >>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>> <b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>> <ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>> <3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's too late for you to run now. You make it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well known that you were not a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being in the womb. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, species > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human, but not yet a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being because I had not been born alive. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, a rat. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The logic of insanity. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You were the one that clearly stated you were not a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being prior to birth. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since live birth is required for the socio-legal > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> status of human being > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the least of your worries. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What. Me worry? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the results > >>>>>>>>>>>> in evidence, little > >>>>>>>>>>>> dummy. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the characters > >>>>>>>>>>> in your > >>>>>>>>>>> mythology. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes. > >>>>>>>>>> So prove there is > >>>>>>>>>> no pushing. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Who said pushing is required? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Who said pulling is present. > >>>>>>> Actually, you did, > >>>>>>> "Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" being > >>>>>> the overriding > >>>>>> event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being a > >>>>>> pushing science? > >>>> > >>>>> At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction force > >>>>> works > >>>>> where needed. > >>>> > >>>> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed > >>>> together? > >>> > >>> You can't see gravity because you can't see space-time. > >> > >> I just knew there was a good reason. But I don't think that's it, > >> quadratic > >> isosceles triangle > > > > Look it up, it's in the science section, under Einstein and his > > theories of relativity, fat earl liar. You need to come out of the > > dark ages. > > like the people that live in aurora ontario canada at yonge and wellington More Like, the MI 456 Alaska Hwy, Muncho Lake, BC V0C 1Z0, doublegservice.com, (250) 277-6970 I win!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 18:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9abifs.cba.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #2088572 |
Tim wrote: > On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 6:31:29 PM UTC-4, % wrote: >> Tim wrote: >>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:06:13 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: >>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Tim >>>> <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:41:14 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> >>>>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>> <0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>> <b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>> <ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>> <3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's too late for you to run now. You make it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well known that you were not a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being in the womb. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, species >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human, but not yet a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being because I had not been born alive. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, a rat. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The logic of insanity. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You were the one that clearly stated you were not a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being prior to birth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since live birth is required for the socio-legal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> status of human being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the least of your worries. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What. Me worry? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the results >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in evidence, little >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dummy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the characters >>>>>>>>>>>>> in your >>>>>>>>>>>>> mythology. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not >>>>>>>>>>>> pushes. >>>>>>>>>>>> So prove there is >>>>>>>>>>>> no pushing. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Who said pushing is required? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Who said pulling is present. >>>>>>>>> Actually, you did, >>>>>>>>> "Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" being >>>>>>>> the overriding >>>>>>>> event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being a >>>>>>>> pushing science? >>>>>> >>>>>>> At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction force >>>>>>> works >>>>>>> where needed. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being >>>>>> pushed together? >>>>> >>>>> You can't see gravity because you can't see space-time. >>>> >>>> I just knew there was a good reason. But I don't think that's it, >>>> quadratic >>>> isosceles triangle >>> >>> Look it up, it's in the science section, under Einstein and his >>> theories of relativity, fat earl liar. You need to come out of the >>> dark ages. >> >> like the people that live in aurora ontario canada at yonge and >> wellington > > More Like, the MI 456 Alaska Hwy, Muncho Lake, BC V0C 1Z0, > doublegservice.com, (250) 277-6970 > > I win! tim says this is where i live do you see any houses http://www.tourismnorthernrockies.ca/images/places_to_see/muncholake.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 18:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ba65c2fc-2909-4bdf-b1f2-f4a80fa3d76d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2088584 |
On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 9:00:12 PM UTC-4, % wrote: > Tim wrote: > > On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 6:31:29 PM UTC-4, % wrote: > >> Tim wrote: > >>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:06:13 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Tim > >>>> <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:41:14 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> > >>>>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>> <0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> > >>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>> <b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>> <ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's too late for you to run now. You make it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well known that you were not a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being in the womb. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, species > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human, but not yet a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being because I had not been born alive. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, a rat. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The logic of insanity. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You were the one that clearly stated you were not a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being prior to birth. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since live birth is required for the socio-legal > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> status of human being > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the least of your worries. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What. Me worry? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the results > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in evidence, little > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dummy. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the characters > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in your > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mythology. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not > >>>>>>>>>>>> pushes. > >>>>>>>>>>>> So prove there is > >>>>>>>>>>>> no pushing. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Who said pushing is required? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Who said pulling is present. > >>>>>>>>> Actually, you did, > >>>>>>>>> "Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" being > >>>>>>>> the overriding > >>>>>>>> event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being a > >>>>>>>> pushing science? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction force > >>>>>>> works > >>>>>>> where needed. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being > >>>>>> pushed together? > >>>>> > >>>>> You can't see gravity because you can't see space-time. > >>>> > >>>> I just knew there was a good reason. But I don't think that's it, > >>>> quadratic > >>>> isosceles triangle > >>> > >>> Look it up, it's in the science section, under Einstein and his > >>> theories of relativity, fat earl liar. You need to come out of the > >>> dark ages. > >> > >> like the people that live in aurora ontario canada at yonge and > >> wellington > > > > More Like, the MI 456 Alaska Hwy, Muncho Lake, BC V0C 1Z0, > > doublegservice.com, (250) 277-6970 > > > > I win! > > tim says this is where i live do you see any houses > > http://www.tourismnorthernrockies.ca/images/places_to_see/muncholake.jpg I didn't say your squaw, I said you live here: https://www.tripadvisor.ca/Hotel_Review-g3952460-d7617521-Reviews-Double_G_Service-Muncho_Lake_British_Columbia.html#photos;geo=3952460&detail=7617521
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 19:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9abos0.b8c.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #2088585 |
Tim wrote: > On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 9:00:12 PM UTC-4, % wrote: >> Tim wrote: >>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 6:31:29 PM UTC-4, % wrote: >>>> Tim wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:06:13 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Tim >>>>>> <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:41:14 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> >>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>> <0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> >>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>> <b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>> <ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's too late for you to run now. You make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well known that you were not a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being in the womb. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> species >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human, but not yet a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being because I had not been born alive. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, a rat. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The logic of insanity. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You were the one that clearly stated you were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being prior to birth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since live birth is required for the socio-legal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> status of human being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the least of your worries. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What. Me worry? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in evidence, little >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dummy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> characters >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mythology. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pushes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So prove there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no pushing. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who said pushing is required? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Who said pulling is present. >>>>>>>>>>> Actually, you did, >>>>>>>>>>> "Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" being >>>>>>>>>> the overriding >>>>>>>>>> event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being a >>>>>>>>>> pushing science? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction force >>>>>>>>> works >>>>>>>>> where needed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being >>>>>>>> pushed together? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't see gravity because you can't see space-time. >>>>>> >>>>>> I just knew there was a good reason. But I don't think that's >>>>>> it, >>>>>> quadratic >>>>>> isosceles triangle >>>>> >>>>> Look it up, it's in the science section, under Einstein and his >>>>> theories of relativity, fat earl liar. You need to come out of the >>>>> dark ages. >>>> >>>> like the people that live in aurora ontario canada at yonge and >>>> wellington >>> >>> More Like, the MI 456 Alaska Hwy, Muncho Lake, BC V0C 1Z0, >>> doublegservice.com, (250) 277-6970 >>> >>> I win! >> >> tim says this is where i live do you see any houses >> >> http://www.tourismnorthernrockies.ca/images/places_to_see/muncholake.jpg > > I didn't say your squaw, I said you live here: > > > https://www.tripadvisor.ca/Hotel_Review-g3952460-d7617521-Reviews-Double_G_Service-Muncho_Lake_British_Columbia.html#photos;geo=3952460&detail=7617521 tim says this is where i live http://www.tourismnorthernrockies.ca/images/places_to_see/muncholake.jpg >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 02:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f23f3d0b-b01f-4a9b-a381-dca1c266a3de@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2088621 |
On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:49:04 PM UTC-4, % wrote: > Tim wrote: > > On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 9:00:12 PM UTC-4, % wrote: > >> Tim wrote: > >>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 6:31:29 PM UTC-4, % wrote: > >>>> Tim wrote: > >>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:06:13 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Tim > >>>>>> <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:41:14 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> > >>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>> <0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> > >>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>> <b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's too late for you to run now. You make > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well known that you were not a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being in the womb. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> species > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human, but not yet a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being because I had not been born alive. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, a rat. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The logic of insanity. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You were the one that clearly stated you were > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being prior to birth. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since live birth is required for the socio-legal > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> status of human being > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the least of your worries. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What. Me worry? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in evidence, little > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dummy. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> characters > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in your > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mythology. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pushes. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So prove there is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no pushing. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who said pushing is required? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Who said pulling is present. > >>>>>>>>>>> Actually, you did, > >>>>>>>>>>> "Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" being > >>>>>>>>>> the overriding > >>>>>>>>>> event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being a > >>>>>>>>>> pushing science? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction force > >>>>>>>>> works > >>>>>>>>> where needed. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being > >>>>>>>> pushed together? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You can't see gravity because you can't see space-time. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I just knew there was a good reason. But I don't think that's > >>>>>> it, > >>>>>> quadratic > >>>>>> isosceles triangle > >>>>> > >>>>> Look it up, it's in the science section, under Einstein and his > >>>>> theories of relativity, fat earl liar. You need to come out of the > >>>>> dark ages. > >>>> > >>>> like the people that live in aurora ontario canada at yonge and > >>>> wellington > >>> > >>> More Like, the MI 456 Alaska Hwy, Muncho Lake, BC V0C 1Z0, > >>> doublegservice.com, (250) 277-6970 > >>> > >>> I win! > >> > >> tim says this is where i live do you see any houses > >> > >> http://www.tourismnorthernrockies.ca/images/places_to_see/muncholake.jpg > > > > I didn't say your squaw, I said you live here: > > > > > > https://www.tripadvisor.ca/Hotel_Review-g3952460-d7617521-Reviews-Double_G_Service-Muncho_Lake_British_Columbia.html#photos;geo=3952460&detail=7617521 > > tim says this is where i live > > http://www.tourismnorthernrockies.ca/images/places_to_see/muncholake.jpg > > Nope, that's where your squaw lives, judging by the fishy smell. You live here, at fluffer central, servicing the truckers: https://www.tripadvisor.ca/Hotel_Review-g3952460-d7617521-Reviews-Double_G_Service-Muncho_Lake_British_Columbia.html#photos;geo=3952460&detail=7617521
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 02:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2e65db83-85be-4673-8ddd-21622160f207@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2088536 |
On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 5:38:42 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:01:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:06:13 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:41:14 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >> >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> ><0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >>On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >>><b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >>>>><ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >>>>>>><3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >>>>>>>>><2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>><dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>><v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>><lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's too late for you to run now. You make it well known that you were not a > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>human being in the womb. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, species human, but not yet a > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>human being because I had not been born alive. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yep, a rat. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The logic of insanity. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>You were the one that clearly stated you were not a human being prior to birth. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Since live birth is required for the socio-legal status of human being > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>That's the least of your worries. > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>What. Me worry? > >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>>Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. > >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>>You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. > >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>>I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the results in evidence, little > >> >> >>>>>>>>dummy. > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>>It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the characters in your > >> >> >>>>>>>mythology. > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>>It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes. So prove there is > >> >> >>>>>>no pushing. > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>>>Who said pushing is required? > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>>Who said pulling is present. > >> >> >>>Actually, you did, > >> >> >>>"Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." > >> >> >> > >> >> >>So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" being the overriding > >> >> >>event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being a pushing science? > >> >> > >> >> >At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction force works > >> >> >where needed. > >> >> > >> >> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? > >> > > >> >You can't see gravity because you can't see space-time. > >> > >> I just knew there was a good reason. But I don't think that's it, quadratic > >> isosceles triangle > > > >Look it up, it's in the science section, under Einstein and his theories of relativity, fat earl liar. You need to come out of the dark ages. > > You lack the ability to be truthful in what you read. > You lack the abilitity to make any sense in what you write. You're just dodging and trying to run away because you know I'm right and you have no response. Gravity isn't a push or a pull, fat man, it's the curvature of spacetime in the presence of massive objects - objects like you, you fat bastard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 14:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fba14c0d-6718-485b-be39-8f8b50d633bd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2089208 |
On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 8:58:08 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:24:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 5:38:42 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:01:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:06:13 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >> >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:41:14 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> ><0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >>><b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >>>>><ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >>>>>>><3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>><2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>><dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>><v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>><lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's too late for you to run now. You make it well known that you were not a > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>human being in the womb. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, species human, but not yet a > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>human being because I had not been born alive. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yep, a rat. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The logic of insanity. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>You were the one that clearly stated you were not a human being prior to birth. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Since live birth is required for the socio-legal status of human being > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>That's the least of your worries. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>What. Me worry? > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the results in evidence, little > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>dummy. > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the characters in your > >> >> >> >>>>>>>mythology. > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>>It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes. So prove there is > >> >> >> >>>>>>no pushing. > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>>>Who said pushing is required? > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >>>>Who said pulling is present. > >> >> >> >>>Actually, you did, > >> >> >> >>>"Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" being the overriding > >> >> >> >>event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being a pushing science? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction force works > >> >> >> >where needed. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? > >> >> > > >> >> >You can't see gravity because you can't see space-time. > >> >> > >> >> I just knew there was a good reason. But I don't think that's it, quadratic > >> >> isosceles triangle > >> > > >> >Look it up, it's in the science section, under Einstein and his theories of relativity, fat earl liar. You need to come out of the dark ages. > >> > >> You lack the ability to be truthful in what you read. > > >You lack the abilitity to make any sense in what you write. You're just dodging and trying to run away because you know > > I'm right and you have no response. Gravity isn't a push or a pull, fat man, it's the curvature of spacetime in the presence of massive objects - objects like you, you fat bastard. > > But is it a push or a pull, quadratic isosceles triangle? > > You're still punting from behind the end zone. Sorta like two objects of > similar mass will still push or pull. Heeheehee. > > You sure stepped on a cow chip on that one. You're a cow chip, liar fel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 15:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9agjaj.f61.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #2089444 |
Tim wrote: > On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 8:58:08 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:24:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 5:38:42 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: >>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:01:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim >>>> <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:06:13 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Tim >>>>>> <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:41:14 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>> <0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>> <b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>> <ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's too late for you to run now. You make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it well known that you were not a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being in the womb. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> species human, but not yet a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being because I had not been born alive. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, a rat. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The logic of insanity. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You were the one that clearly stated you were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not a human being prior to birth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since live birth is required for the socio-legal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> status of human being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the least of your worries. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What. Me worry? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results in evidence, little >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dummy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> characters in your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mythology. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pushes. So prove there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no pushing. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who said pushing is required? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Who said pulling is present. >>>>>>>>>>> Actually, you did, >>>>>>>>>>> "Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" >>>>>>>>>> being the overriding >>>>>>>>>> event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being a >>>>>>>>>> pushing science? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction >>>>>>>>> force works >>>>>>>>> where needed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being >>>>>>>> pushed together? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't see gravity because you can't see space-time. >>>>>> >>>>>> I just knew there was a good reason. But I don't think that's >>>>>> it, quadratic >>>>>> isosceles triangle >>>>> >>>>> Look it up, it's in the science section, under Einstein and his >>>>> theories of relativity, fat earl liar. You need to come out of >>>>> the dark ages. >>>> >>>> You lack the ability to be truthful in what you read. >> >>> You lack the abilitity to make any sense in what you write. You're >>> just dodging and trying to run away because you know >>> I'm right and you have no response. Gravity isn't a push or a pull, >>> fat man, it's the curvature of spacetime in the presence of massive >>> objects - objects like you, you fat bastard. >> >> But is it a push or a pull, quadratic isosceles triangle? >> >> You're still punting from behind the end zone. Sorta like two >> objects of >> similar mass will still push or pull. Heeheehee. >> >> You sure stepped on a cow chip on that one. > > You're a cow chip, liar fel. tim lives in aurora
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 02:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cd0ae338-26ad-49cc-ac0a-b7a387421498@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2089484 |
On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 6:45:07 PM UTC-4, % wrote: > Tim wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 8:58:08 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:24:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 5:38:42 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:01:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim > >>>> <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:06:13 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Tim > >>>>>> <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:41:14 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>> <0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>> <b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's too late for you to run now. You make > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it well known that you were not a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being in the womb. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> species human, but not yet a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being because I had not been born alive. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, a rat. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The logic of insanity. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You were the one that clearly stated you were > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not a human being prior to birth. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since live birth is required for the socio-legal > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> status of human being > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the least of your worries. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What. Me worry? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results in evidence, little > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dummy. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> characters in your > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mythology. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pushes. So prove there is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no pushing. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who said pushing is required? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Who said pulling is present. > >>>>>>>>>>> Actually, you did, > >>>>>>>>>>> "Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" > >>>>>>>>>> being the overriding > >>>>>>>>>> event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being a > >>>>>>>>>> pushing science? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction > >>>>>>>>> force works > >>>>>>>>> where needed. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being > >>>>>>>> pushed together? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You can't see gravity because you can't see space-time. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I just knew there was a good reason. But I don't think that's > >>>>>> it, quadratic > >>>>>> isosceles triangle > >>>>> > >>>>> Look it up, it's in the science section, under Einstein and his > >>>>> theories of relativity, fat earl liar. You need to come out of > >>>>> the dark ages. > >>>> > >>>> You lack the ability to be truthful in what you read. > >> > >>> You lack the abilitity to make any sense in what you write. You're > >>> just dodging and trying to run away because you know > >>> I'm right and you have no response. Gravity isn't a push or a pull, > >>> fat man, it's the curvature of spacetime in the presence of massive > >>> objects - objects like you, you fat bastard. > >> > >> But is it a push or a pull, quadratic isosceles triangle? > >> > >> You're still punting from behind the end zone. Sorta like two > >> objects of > >> similar mass will still push or pull. Heeheehee. > >> > >> You sure stepped on a cow chip on that one. > > > > You're a cow chip, liar fel. > > tim lives in aurora I win, you're the fluffer gimp of Muncho Lake.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 11:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9aipvd.icu.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #2089646 |
Tim wrote: > On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 6:45:07 PM UTC-4, % wrote: >> Tim wrote: >>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 8:58:08 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: >>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:24:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim >>>> <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 5:38:42 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:01:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim >>>>>> <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:06:13 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Tim >>>>>>>> <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:41:14 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>> <0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>> <b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's too late for you to run now. You make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it well known that you were not a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being in the womb. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> species human, but not yet a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> human being because I had not been born >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alive. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, a rat. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The logic of insanity. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You were the one that clearly stated you were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not a human being prior to birth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since live birth is required for the socio-legal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> status of human being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the least of your worries. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What. Me worry? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results in evidence, little >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dummy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> characters in your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mythology. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pushes. So prove there is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no pushing. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who said pushing is required? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who said pulling is present. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, you did, >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" >>>>>>>>>>>> being the overriding >>>>>>>>>>>> event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being >>>>>>>>>>>> a pushing science? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction >>>>>>>>>>> force works >>>>>>>>>>> where needed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being >>>>>>>>>> pushed together? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You can't see gravity because you can't see space-time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just knew there was a good reason. But I don't think that's >>>>>>>> it, quadratic >>>>>>>> isosceles triangle >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Look it up, it's in the science section, under Einstein and his >>>>>>> theories of relativity, fat earl liar. You need to come out of >>>>>>> the dark ages. >>>>>> >>>>>> You lack the ability to be truthful in what you read. >>>> >>>>> You lack the abilitity to make any sense in what you write. You're >>>>> just dodging and trying to run away because you know >>>>> I'm right and you have no response. Gravity isn't a push or a >>>>> pull, fat man, it's the curvature of spacetime in the presence of >>>>> massive objects - objects like you, you fat bastard. >>>> >>>> But is it a push or a pull, quadratic isosceles triangle? >>>> >>>> You're still punting from behind the end zone. Sorta like two >>>> objects of >>>> similar mass will still push or pull. Heeheehee. >>>> >>>> You sure stepped on a cow chip on that one. >>> >>> You're a cow chip, liar fel. >> >> tim lives in aurora > > I win, you're the fluffer gimp of Muncho Lake. tim says i live here https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Muncho_Lake,_BC,_Canada_June2010.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 13:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2c464ec1-09f9-483e-9f69-b600832f5b70@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2089444 |
On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 9:44:24 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:13:46 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 8:58:08 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:24:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 5:38:42 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >> >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:01:51 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 4:06:13 PM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 07:51:38 -0700 (PDT), Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 10:41:14 AM UTC-4, duke wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >> >alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >> ><0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >>On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >> >>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >> >>><b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >> >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >> >>>>><ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>><3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>><2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>><dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>><v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>><lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's too late for you to run now. You make it well known that you were not a > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>human being in the womb. > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, species human, but not yet a > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>human being because I had not been born alive. > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yep, a rat. > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The logic of insanity. > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>You were the one that clearly stated you were not a human being prior to birth. > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Since live birth is required for the socio-legal status of human being > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>That's the least of your worries. > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>What. Me worry? > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the results in evidence, little > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>dummy. > >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the characters in your > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>mythology. > >> >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes. So prove there is > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>no pushing. > >> >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>>Who said pushing is required? > >> >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>Who said pulling is present. > >> >> >> >> >>>Actually, you did, > >> >> >> >> >>>"Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >>So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" being the overriding > >> >> >> >> >>event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being a pushing science? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction force works > >> >> >> >> >where needed. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >You can't see gravity because you can't see space-time. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I just knew there was a good reason. But I don't think that's it, quadratic > >> >> >> isosceles triangle > >> >> > > >> >> >Look it up, it's in the science section, under Einstein and his theories of relativity, fat earl liar. You need to come out of the dark ages. > >> >> > >> >> You lack the ability to be truthful in what you read. > >> > >> >You lack the abilitity to make any sense in what you write. You're just dodging and trying to run away because you know > >> > I'm right and you have no response. Gravity isn't a push or a pull, fat man, it's the curvature of spacetime in the presence of massive objects - objects like you, you fat bastard. > >> > >> But is it a push or a pull, quadratic isosceles triangle? > >> > >> You're still punting from behind the end zone. Sorta like two objects of > >> similar mass will still push or pull. Heeheehee. > >> > >> You sure stepped on a cow chip on that one. > > > >You're a cow chip, liar fel. > > Bite me, queer qit. Heeheehee. I'm not your priest, diddler fel the giggling idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 14:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <p98lgb53ds0qlksdidjhsq4616rnd2fmq0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2088155 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:41:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <9dpkgbpl93hiid60v8279s8araisoluhom@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:20:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:07:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><0hvhgbdltp50q1vh4c7ve8eul15vjmlpcl@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:38:27 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:06:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><b80ggb95lccomn2pnpf01p93sjjoaj9n30@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:21:03 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><ql5dgb5u4hmbi0mkbgvp1b0e08h1i255ia@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:45:22 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:58:07 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><3fcagbljuai3b9namune4svjit1td5garn@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:24:55 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>><2fb7gb9dt5g8d6glo21utsg9709a9bl1og@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:59:21 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:58:36 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>><dpa5gb5tge26buh7sqapfmhqgp2ukfr16a@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:08:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:23:07 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>><v862gb9t5od68erm2sg44uorj3b1efd5qc@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:56:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:41:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><lefvfbtkrkpcd2ntg0r7n5jv91ie18t4oo@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's too late for you to run now. You make it well known that you were not a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>human being in the womb. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That is absolutely true. I was a fetus, species human, but not yet a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>human being because I had not been born alive. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yep, a rat. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The logic of insanity. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You were the one that clearly stated you were not a human being prior to birth. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Since live birth is required for the socio-legal status of human being >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>That's the least of your worries. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>What. Me worry? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Well, Jesus sweated blood before his crucifixion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You have yet to prove any such person ever existed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I can't prove gravity either. All I see are the results in evidence, little >>>>>>>>>dummy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>It is easy to prove gravity exists. Unlike the characters in your >>>>>>>>mythology. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>It is??? So prove it. Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes. So prove there is >>>>>>>no pushing. >>>>> >>>>>>Who said pushing is required? >>>>> >>>>>Who said pulling is present. >>>>Actually, you did, >>>>"Remember, gravity pulls, not pushes." >>> >>>So we believe. But is our concept of "gravity pulling" being the overriding >>>event, or is there something, as in gravity actually being a pushing science? > >>At this point it really doesn't matter. As a attraction force works >>where needed. > >You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? > The current law of gravity makes a lot more sense than invisible hands smushing things together. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 05:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <g3qmgbd82lrlppar2mk89pg09nm8fdoh3n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2088428 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:07:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <0iclgbdrvu9n70arap8klopombe16fce0f@4ax.com> wrote: >>>You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? > >>The current law of gravity makes a lot more sense than invisible hands >>smushing things together. > >But how do you know it's the attraction equation rather than the pushing >equation that is the truth? > >Things get equally smushed either way. There is something there to attract. There is nothing there to push. On a more complex level (far beyond my knowledge) the attraction model still holds true. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 18:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ug9ogbd5d7rh0pruclaoc3oeh54043ihrp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2088721 |
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:41:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <db6ogb1uni522fht5a9fo9c9af3gehc5av@4ax.com> wrote: >On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:06:15 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:07:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><0iclgbdrvu9n70arap8klopombe16fce0f@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>>>You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? >>> >>>>The current law of gravity makes a lot more sense than invisible hands >>>>smushing things together. >>> >>>But how do you know it's the attraction equation rather than the pushing >>>equation that is the truth? >>> >>>Things get equally smushed either way. >> >>There is something there to attract. There is nothing there to push. > >Whoa!! How do you know. There is apparently nothing there. > >>On a more complex level (far beyond my knowledge) the attraction model >>still holds true. > >Maybe gravity works from the back side as a push. Don't be stupid to suggest >you know better. > I will go with the experts, not the mystics. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 10:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <v2lsgb10kgs0b2oebei55qgcjcbh0j0v8m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2089017 |
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:59:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <m7spgb5apgs4qap8ittsi6rv1euqt23f33@4ax.com> wrote: >On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:34:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:41:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><db6ogb1uni522fht5a9fo9c9af3gehc5av@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:06:15 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:07:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><0iclgbdrvu9n70arap8klopombe16fce0f@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? >>>>> >>>>>>The current law of gravity makes a lot more sense than invisible hands >>>>>>smushing things together. >>>>> >>>>>But how do you know it's the attraction equation rather than the pushing >>>>>equation that is the truth? >>>>> >>>>>Things get equally smushed either way. >>>> >>>>There is something there to attract. There is nothing there to push. >>> >>>Whoa!! How do you know. >> >>There is apparently nothing there. > >Then definitely no pulling. We were discussing pushing, but you never get anything straight do you? You are unable to stay on the topic without twisting or jumping on something else. > >>>>On a more complex level (far beyond my knowledge) the attraction model >>>>still holds true. >>>Maybe gravity works from the back side as a push. Don't be stupid to suggest >>>you know better. > >>I will go with the experts, not the mystics. > >They have the equation correct, but they can't specify whether it's a pull or a >push. That curvature of time-space does strange things. > Nobody said they had all of the answers. Yet. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 05:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <v9nugbl73pl6ocm6q1i5rjh3kc2us0noje@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2089702 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:46:20 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <5b8tgbpev4666ba5ldvs1s1rua9jlpf63v@4ax.com> wrote: >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:17:06 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:59:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><m7spgb5apgs4qap8ittsi6rv1euqt23f33@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:34:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:41:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><db6ogb1uni522fht5a9fo9c9af3gehc5av@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:06:15 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:07:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><0iclgbdrvu9n70arap8klopombe16fce0f@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The current law of gravity makes a lot more sense than invisible hands >>>>>>>>smushing things together. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>But how do you know it's the attraction equation rather than the pushing >>>>>>>equation that is the truth? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Things get equally smushed either way. >>>>>> >>>>>>There is something there to attract. There is nothing there to push. >>>>> >>>>>Whoa!! How do you know. >>>> >>>>There is apparently nothing there. >>> >>>Then definitely no pulling. >> >>We were discussing pushing, but you never get anything straight do >>you? You are unable to stay on the topic without twisting or jumping >>on something else. > >Gravity is very simple: A smaller mass will move towards a greater mass. One >man's pull is another man's push. Your inability to rationalize that is to your >defeet. Gravity as we perceive it is simple, but as it exists in other context it is quite complex. > >>>>>>On a more complex level (far beyond my knowledge) the attraction model >>>>>>still holds true. >>>>>Maybe gravity works from the back side as a push. Don't be stupid to suggest >>>>>you know better. >>> >>>>I will go with the experts, not the mystics. >>> >>>They have the equation correct, but they can't specify whether it's a pull or a >>>push. That curvature of time-space does strange things. > >>Nobody said they had all of the answers. Yet. > >I like the sound of space time curvature. It tends to confuse the simple mind >even more. > That from the master of the simple minded. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 17:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9al98e.vkn.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #2090093 |
Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:46:20 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > alt.atheism with message-id > <5b8tgbpev4666ba5ldvs1s1rua9jlpf63v@4ax.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:17:06 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:59:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>> alt.atheism with message-id >>> <m7spgb5apgs4qap8ittsi6rv1euqt23f33@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:34:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:41:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>> <db6ogb1uni522fht5a9fo9c9af3gehc5av@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:06:15 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:07:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>> <0iclgbdrvu9n70arap8klopombe16fce0f@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The current law of gravity makes a lot more sense than invisible hands >>>>>>>>> smushing things together. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But how do you know it's the attraction equation rather than the pushing >>>>>>>> equation that is the truth? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Things get equally smushed either way. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is something there to attract. There is nothing there to push. >>>>>> >>>>>> Whoa!! How do you know. >>>>> >>>>> There is apparently nothing there. >>>> >>>> Then definitely no pulling. >>> >>> We were discussing pushing, but you never get anything straight do >>> you? You are unable to stay on the topic without twisting or jumping >>> on something else. >> >> Gravity is very simple: A smaller mass will move towards a greater mass. One >> man's pull is another man's push. Your inability to rationalize that is to your >> defeet. > > Gravity as we perceive it is simple, but as it exists in other context > it is quite complex. There is the problem. duke sees gravity as simple one directional force. While he ignores the equal relative force pulling the more massive object to the less massive object. There is no push in Gravity, push is comes from different type of force... >>>>>>> On a more complex level (far beyond my knowledge) the attraction model >>>>>>> still holds true. >>>>>> Maybe gravity works from the back side as a push. Don't be stupid to suggest >>>>>> you know better. >>>> >>>>> I will go with the experts, not the mystics. >>>> >>>> They have the equation correct, but they can't specify whether it's a pull or a >>>> push. That curvature of time-space does strange things. >> >>> Nobody said they had all of the answers. Yet. >> >> I like the sound of space time curvature. It tends to confuse the simple mind >> even more. >> > > That from the master of the simple minded. I would consider duke a master a anything except baiting.. -- Gumbo, a master baiter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 17:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <a820hbdf5p1ju16g518u02vb9ateka2tn5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2090283 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:23:56 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> in alt.atheism with message-id <9al98e.vkn.17.2@news.alt.net> wrote: >Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:46:20 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> alt.atheism with message-id >> <5b8tgbpev4666ba5ldvs1s1rua9jlpf63v@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:17:06 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:59:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <m7spgb5apgs4qap8ittsi6rv1euqt23f33@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:34:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:41:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>> <db6ogb1uni522fht5a9fo9c9af3gehc5av@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:06:15 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:07:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>> <0iclgbdrvu9n70arap8klopombe16fce0f@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The current law of gravity makes a lot more sense than invisible hands >>>>>>>>>> smushing things together. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But how do you know it's the attraction equation rather than the pushing >>>>>>>>> equation that is the truth? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Things get equally smushed either way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is something there to attract. There is nothing there to push. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Whoa!! How do you know. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is apparently nothing there. >>>>> >>>>> Then definitely no pulling. >>>> >>>> We were discussing pushing, but you never get anything straight do >>>> you? You are unable to stay on the topic without twisting or jumping >>>> on something else. >>> >>> Gravity is very simple: A smaller mass will move towards a greater mass. One >>> man's pull is another man's push. Your inability to rationalize that is to your >>> defeet. >> >> Gravity as we perceive it is simple, but as it exists in other context >> it is quite complex. > >There is the problem. duke sees gravity as simple one directional force. >While he ignores the equal relative force pulling the more massive object >to the less massive object. > >There is no push in Gravity, push is comes from different type of force... I am amazed he even admits it exists at all since it isn't mentioned in his magic book of myths. > >>>>>>>> On a more complex level (far beyond my knowledge) the attraction model >>>>>>>> still holds true. >>>>>>> Maybe gravity works from the back side as a push. Don't be stupid to suggest >>>>>>> you know better. >>>>> >>>>>> I will go with the experts, not the mystics. >>>>> >>>>> They have the equation correct, but they can't specify whether it's a pull or a >>>>> push. That curvature of time-space does strange things. >>> >>>> Nobody said they had all of the answers. Yet. >>> >>> I like the sound of space time curvature. It tends to confuse the simple mind >>> even more. >>> >> >> That from the master of the simple minded. > >I would consider duke a master a anything except baiting.. Are you sure he can do that correctly? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 17:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <b420hbla1rlkkuvdi0o8gs76omg39dkev7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2090093 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:19:16 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <87kvgb16b53tl4sbr8s2ggsu48jn713dka@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:07:07 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:46:20 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><5b8tgbpev4666ba5ldvs1s1rua9jlpf63v@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:17:06 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:59:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><m7spgb5apgs4qap8ittsi6rv1euqt23f33@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:34:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:41:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><db6ogb1uni522fht5a9fo9c9af3gehc5av@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:06:15 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:07:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><0iclgbdrvu9n70arap8klopombe16fce0f@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>The current law of gravity makes a lot more sense than invisible hands >>>>>>>>>>smushing things together. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>But how do you know it's the attraction equation rather than the pushing >>>>>>>>>equation that is the truth? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Things get equally smushed either way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>There is something there to attract. There is nothing there to push. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Whoa!! How do you know. >>>>>> >>>>>>There is apparently nothing there. >>>>> >>>>>Then definitely no pulling. >>>> >>>>We were discussing pushing, but you never get anything straight do >>>>you? You are unable to stay on the topic without twisting or jumping >>>>on something else. >>> >>>Gravity is very simple: A smaller mass will move towards a greater mass. One >>>man's pull is another man's push. Your inability to rationalize that is to your >>>defeet. > >>Gravity as we perceive it is simple, but as it exists in other context >>it is quite complex. > >Yep, could be attraction or could be pushing. Pulling works better under certain conditions. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 23:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3na3hbd9pepf7o709ugghig7mc4q78feho@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2090412 |
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:40:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <ktn2hb1hhicpum2ckvsftdlg1ah9s8g3i0@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:16:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:19:16 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><87kvgb16b53tl4sbr8s2ggsu48jn713dka@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:07:07 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:46:20 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><5b8tgbpev4666ba5ldvs1s1rua9jlpf63v@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:17:06 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:59:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><m7spgb5apgs4qap8ittsi6rv1euqt23f33@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:34:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:41:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><db6ogb1uni522fht5a9fo9c9af3gehc5av@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:06:15 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:07:39 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>><0iclgbdrvu9n70arap8klopombe16fce0f@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>You can't see gravity. How do you know things aren't being pushed together? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>The current law of gravity makes a lot more sense than invisible hands >>>>>>>>>>>>smushing things together. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>But how do you know it's the attraction equation rather than the pushing >>>>>>>>>>>equation that is the truth? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Things get equally smushed either way. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>There is something there to attract. There is nothing there to push. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Whoa!! How do you know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>There is apparently nothing there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Then definitely no pulling. >>>>>> >>>>>>We were discussing pushing, but you never get anything straight do >>>>>>you? You are unable to stay on the topic without twisting or jumping >>>>>>on something else. >>>>> >>>>>Gravity is very simple: A smaller mass will move towards a greater mass. One >>>>>man's pull is another man's push. Your inability to rationalize that is to your >>>>>defeet. >>> >>>>Gravity as we perceive it is simple, but as it exists in other context >>>>it is quite complex. >>> >>>Yep, could be attraction or could be pushing. > >>Pulling works better under certain conditions. > >Are you well practiced? > Another of your meaningless comments. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web