Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.atheism > #2100086 > unrolled thread

Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No?

Started bySmiler <smiler@jo.king>
First post2016-05-03 22:59 +0000
Last post2016-05-17 06:41 -0500
Articles 13 on this page of 73 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 22:59 +0000
    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:01 -0500
      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:43 +0000
        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:46 -0500
          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:19 +0000
            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-07 18:06 -0700
              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 16:42 +0000
                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-08 11:22 -0700
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-09 01:09 +0000
                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-09 13:41 +1000
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-09 05:02 -0700
                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-05-09 18:14 -0400
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-10 19:36 +0000
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-11 08:50 +1000
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-05-10 21:25 -0400
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-11 17:25 +1000
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2016-05-11 12:03 +0100
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-11 07:05 -0500
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-11 05:24 -0700
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-05-11 09:16 -0400
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-12 10:26 +1000
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-05-11 09:16 -0400
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-11 15:51 +0000
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-05-11 13:58 -0400
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:20 +0000
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-12 10:28 +1000
                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-08 17:15 -0700
                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:08 -0500
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:23 +0000
                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:24 -0500
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:44 +0000
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:21 -0500
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:19 +0000
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:18 -0500
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:08 +0000
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:42 -0500
                                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:31 +0000
                                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:15 -0500
                                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:44 +0000
            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:07 -0500
              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:27 +0000
                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:25 -0500
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:47 +0000
                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:23 -0500
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:23 +0000
                        (no, he doesn’t) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:29 -0700
                          (no, he doesn’t) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:43 -0700
                        Santa   The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:51 -0700
                          Re: Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 13:29 -0700
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:16 -0500
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:11 +0000
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:40 -0500
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:35 +0000
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 15:17 -0400
                                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:41 +0000
                                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0400
                                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
                                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:59 -0400
                                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
                                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:03 -0400
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
                                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:46 +0000
                                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
                                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-20 00:37 +0000
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-14 03:29 -0400
                        Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:45 -0700
                          Re: Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:58 -0700
                          Re: Atheists have eyes. Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0600
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:17 -0500
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-15 19:00 -0400
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-16 13:23 -0500
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 02:43 -0400
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:41 -0500

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]


#2108831

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Message-ID<tmfpjb1fpjnkh8uo0384kll7ijckcn4suc@4ax.com>
In reply to#2108137
On Tue, 17 May 2016 16:35:14 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:

>On Tue, 17 May 2016 06:40:41 -0500, duke wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 May 2016 22:11:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Sun, 15 May 2016 16:16:34 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 14 May 2016 02:23:36 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:23:55 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 08:25:39 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 00:27:19 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 11 May 2016 14:07:28 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2016 00:19:22 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 07 May 2016 07:46:30 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> They weren't in a hospital.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>All Accident and Emergency departments are in hospitals here.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> That's not very wise.  We have emergency services all over the
>>>>>>>>>> place.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>So do we in, the form of the ambulance service and their
>>>>>>>>>paramedics.
>>>>>>>> Yet you said they were at hospitals only
>>>>>>>An ambulance isn't a department, moron.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I didn't say it was a department.  You said all emergencies services
>>>>>> are at hospitals.
>>>> 
>>>>>Read for comprehension, moron.
>>>>>I wrote "All Accident and Emergency _departments_ are in hospitals
>>>>>here."
>>>>>It's just 10 lines up from here.
>>>> 
>>>> Well, that's silly.
>>>
>>>Yes, you were silly. Try reading for comprehension in future.
>> 
>> If you hadn't been caught with your pants down, you would have presented
>> your case in another way.
>> 
>> Remember, it was you that said "All Accident and Emergency departments
>> are in hospitals here".
>
>That's still true, liar Earl.

And the mistake in the way you said it implies so are all the ambulances.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2109537

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-05-19 19:46 +0000
Message-ID<nhl56v$qbd$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#2108831
On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:14:07 -0500, duke wrote:

> On Tue, 17 May 2016 16:35:14 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 17 May 2016 06:40:41 -0500, duke wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 May 2016 22:11:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Sun, 15 May 2016 16:16:34 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 14 May 2016 02:23:36 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:23:55 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 08:25:39 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 00:27:19 +0000 (UTC), Smiler
>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 11 May 2016 14:07:28 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2016 00:19:22 +0000 (UTC), Smiler
>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 07 May 2016 07:46:30 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They weren't in a hospital.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>All Accident and Emergency departments are in hospitals here.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> That's not very wise.  We have emergency services all over the
>>>>>>>>>>> place.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>So do we in, the form of the ambulance service and their
>>>>>>>>>>paramedics.
>>>>>>>>> Yet you said they were at hospitals only
>>>>>>>>An ambulance isn't a department, moron.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I didn't say it was a department.  You said all emergencies
>>>>>>> services are at hospitals.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>Read for comprehension, moron.
>>>>>>I wrote "All Accident and Emergency _departments_ are in hospitals
>>>>>>here."
>>>>>>It's just 10 lines up from here.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Well, that's silly.
>>>>
>>>>Yes, you were silly. Try reading for comprehension in future.
>>> 
>>> If you hadn't been caught with your pants down, you would have
>>> presented your case in another way.
>>> 
>>> Remember, it was you that said "All Accident and Emergency departments
>>> are in hospitals here".
>>
>>That's still true, liar Earl.
> 
> And the mistake in the way you said it implies so are all the
> ambulances.

Is that supposed to be English?

> *****
> "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI *****

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2109596

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Message-ID<7jcsjbpkl2kcnjvtc8bqiht3rcckmj5ssf@4ax.com>
In reply to#2109537
On Thu, 19 May 2016 19:46:39 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:

>On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:14:07 -0500, duke wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 May 2016 16:35:14 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Tue, 17 May 2016 06:40:41 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 16 May 2016 22:11:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>On Sun, 15 May 2016 16:16:34 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 14 May 2016 02:23:36 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:23:55 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 08:25:39 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 00:27:19 +0000 (UTC), Smiler
>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 11 May 2016 14:07:28 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2016 00:19:22 +0000 (UTC), Smiler
>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 07 May 2016 07:46:30 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They weren't in a hospital.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>All Accident and Emergency departments are in hospitals here.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's not very wise.  We have emergency services all over the
>>>>>>>>>>>> place.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>So do we in, the form of the ambulance service and their
>>>>>>>>>>>paramedics.
>>>>>>>>>> Yet you said they were at hospitals only
>>>>>>>>>An ambulance isn't a department, moron.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I didn't say it was a department.  You said all emergencies
>>>>>>>> services are at hospitals.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>Read for comprehension, moron.
>>>>>>>I wrote "All Accident and Emergency _departments_ are in hospitals
>>>>>>>here."
>>>>>>>It's just 10 lines up from here.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Well, that's silly.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, you were silly. Try reading for comprehension in future.
>>>> 
>>>> If you hadn't been caught with your pants down, you would have
>>>> presented your case in another way.
>>>> 
>>>> Remember, it was you that said "All Accident and Emergency departments
>>>> are in hospitals here".
>>>
>>>That's still true, liar Earl.
>> 
>> And the mistake in the way you said it implies so are all the
>> ambulances.
>
>Is that supposed to be English?

JU got it.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2109714

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-05-20 00:37 +0000
Message-ID<nhlm8r$1fqf$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#2109596
On Thu, 19 May 2016 16:38:59 -0500, duke wrote:

> On Thu, 19 May 2016 19:46:39 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:14:07 -0500, duke wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 17 May 2016 16:35:14 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Tue, 17 May 2016 06:40:41 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 16 May 2016 22:11:28 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>On Sun, 15 May 2016 16:16:34 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 May 2016 02:23:36 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:23:55 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Smiler
>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 08:25:39 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 00:27:19 +0000 (UTC), Smiler
>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 11 May 2016 14:07:28 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2016 00:19:22 +0000 (UTC), Smiler
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 07 May 2016 07:46:30 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They weren't in a hospital.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>All Accident and Emergency departments are in hospitals
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's not very wise.  We have emergency services all over
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the place.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>So do we in, the form of the ambulance service and their
>>>>>>>>>>>>paramedics.
>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you said they were at hospitals only
>>>>>>>>>>An ambulance isn't a department, moron.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I didn't say it was a department.  You said all emergencies
>>>>>>>>> services are at hospitals.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>Read for comprehension, moron.
>>>>>>>>I wrote "All Accident and Emergency _departments_ are in hospitals
>>>>>>>>here."
>>>>>>>>It's just 10 lines up from here.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Well, that's silly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, you were silly. Try reading for comprehension in future.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you hadn't been caught with your pants down, you would have
>>>>> presented your case in another way.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Remember, it was you that said "All Accident and Emergency
>>>>> departments are in hospitals here".
>>>>
>>>>That's still true, liar Earl.
>>> 
>>> And the mistake in the way you said it implies so are all the
>>> ambulances.
>>
>>Is that supposed to be English?
> 
> JU got it.

More nonsense from Earl.

> *****
> "Masturbation is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI *****

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2106175

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2016-05-14 03:29 -0400
Message-ID<iqkdjbdfhvfmrjcscee2bs3rcobrll6p2d@4ax.com>
In reply to#2105918
On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:23:55 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<8rkcjbh64ftvqaou9c61aqjmupl66eca8f@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 08:25:39 -0500, duke wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 00:27:19 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Wed, 11 May 2016 14:07:28 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2016 00:19:22 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>On Sat, 07 May 2016 07:46:30 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>
>>>><snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>> They weren't in a hospital.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>All Accident and Emergency departments are in hospitals here.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That's not very wise.  We have emergency services all over the place.
>>>>
>>>>So do we in, the form of the ambulance service and their paramedics.
>>> Yet you said they were at hospitals only
>>An ambulance isn't a department, moron.
>
>I didn't say it was a department.  You said all emergencies services are at
>hospitals.  WE have emergency services available all over the city, especially
>in the form of ambulances.

Ambulances are not emergency services.  The Emergency Medical
Technicians that man ambulances only stabilize a victim for transport
to a hospital.

>
>Please try to keep up.
>

Pot.  Kettle.

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2106340 — Atheist have fishy eyes.

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-05-14 10:45 -0700
SubjectAtheist have fishy eyes.
Message-ID<5737643B.3B18@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#2106175
When someone tells you
they are an atheist...

they got that fishy look
 in their eyes..

have you noticed?


You wanna tell them, "GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR "I DON'T BELIEVE IN GOD" MUMBLE JUMBO!"


Then they tell you they believe in 'parallel universes', and your eyes roll.


Like, how much garbage can you take from them??


It's gotta be a fuckin joke, youknowwatimean?


They are too fishy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2106348 — Re: Atheist have fishy eyes.

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-05-14 10:58 -0700
SubjectRe: Atheist have fishy eyes.
Message-ID<57376732.5F1B@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#2106340
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> When someone tells you
> they are an atheist...
> 
> they got that fishy look
>  in their eyes..
> 
> have you noticed?
> 
> You wanna tell them, "GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR "I DON'T BELIEVE IN GOD" MUMBLE JUMBO!"
> 
> Then they tell you they believe in 'parallel universes', and your eyes roll.
> 
> Like, how much garbage can you take from them??
> 
> It's gotta be a fuckin joke, youknowwatimean?
> 
> They are too fishy.


...and then you got
these 'science guys' with
their 'million beliefs' they call
 scientific theories...

I mean, those 'science guys' believe
there are EARTHS everywhere!!!


They want you to believe you can go to another
of those planets and take the train to go see a movie...


What are they playing there? "ALIENS MONSTERS FROM PLANET EARTH!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2106396 — Re: Atheists have eyes.

FromVirgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com>
Date2016-05-14 12:55 -0600
SubjectRe: Atheists have eyes.
Message-ID<VIRGIL-A4C396.12555014052016@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#2106340
In article <5737643B.3B18@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> When someone tells you
> they are an atheist...
> 
> they got that look
>  in their eyes..
 
That is just a natural reaction to the ugly look in your eyes!
-- 
Virgil
"Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2106994

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2016-05-15 16:17 -0500
Message-ID<spphjb5t7toptspl6ph9nfjd5u2d14daif@4ax.com>
In reply to#2106175
On Sat, 14 May 2016 03:29:58 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:23:55 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><8rkcjbh64ftvqaou9c61aqjmupl66eca8f@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 08:25:39 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 00:27:19 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>On Wed, 11 May 2016 14:07:28 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2016 00:19:22 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>On Sat, 07 May 2016 07:46:30 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>><snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They weren't in a hospital.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>All Accident and Emergency departments are in hospitals here.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That's not very wise.  We have emergency services all over the place.
>>>>>
>>>>>So do we in, the form of the ambulance service and their paramedics.
>>>> Yet you said they were at hospitals only
>>>An ambulance isn't a department, moron.
>>
>>I didn't say it was a department.  You said all emergencies services are at
>>hospitals.  WE have emergency services available all over the city, especially
>>in the form of ambulances.

>Ambulances are not emergency services.  The Emergency Medical
>Technicians that man ambulances only stabilize a victim for transport
>to a hospital.

Haahaahaa.  Now he's getting desperate trying to nickel and dime the
discussion..

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2107048

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2016-05-15 19:00 -0400
Message-ID<cpvhjb534frcohmirff60652gfv67lvd2q@4ax.com>
In reply to#2106994
On Sun, 15 May 2016 16:17:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<spphjb5t7toptspl6ph9nfjd5u2d14daif@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 14 May 2016 03:29:58 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:23:55 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>alt.atheism with message-id
>><8rkcjbh64ftvqaou9c61aqjmupl66eca8f@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 08:25:39 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 00:27:19 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>On Wed, 11 May 2016 14:07:28 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2016 00:19:22 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>On Sat, 07 May 2016 07:46:30 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They weren't in a hospital.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>All Accident and Emergency departments are in hospitals here.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That's not very wise.  We have emergency services all over the place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So do we in, the form of the ambulance service and their paramedics.
>>>>> Yet you said they were at hospitals only
>>>>An ambulance isn't a department, moron.
>>>
>>>I didn't say it was a department.  You said all emergencies services are at
>>>hospitals.  WE have emergency services available all over the city, especially
>>>in the form of ambulances.
>
>>Ambulances are not emergency services.  The Emergency Medical
>>Technicians that man ambulances only stabilize a victim for transport
>>to a hospital.
>
>Haahaahaa.  Now he's getting desperate trying to nickel and dime the
>discussion..
>

Some would say those are the facts.  But you always have a problem
with the facts don't you?

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2107471

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2016-05-16 13:23 -0500
Message-ID<er3kjblqqacpnv0l0mp9hehabbefa5oupn@4ax.com>
In reply to#2107048
On Sun, 15 May 2016 19:00:02 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Sun, 15 May 2016 16:17:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><spphjb5t7toptspl6ph9nfjd5u2d14daif@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 14 May 2016 03:29:58 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:23:55 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>><8rkcjbh64ftvqaou9c61aqjmupl66eca8f@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 08:25:39 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 00:27:19 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>On Wed, 11 May 2016 14:07:28 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2016 00:19:22 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 07 May 2016 07:46:30 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They weren't in a hospital.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>All Accident and Emergency departments are in hospitals here.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> That's not very wise.  We have emergency services all over the place.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So do we in, the form of the ambulance service and their paramedics.
>>>>>> Yet you said they were at hospitals only
>>>>>An ambulance isn't a department, moron.
>>>>
>>>>I didn't say it was a department.  You said all emergencies services are at
>>>>hospitals.  WE have emergency services available all over the city, especially
>>>>in the form of ambulances.
>>
>>>Ambulances are not emergency services.  The Emergency Medical
>>>Technicians that man ambulances only stabilize a victim for transport
>>>to a hospital.
>>
>>Haahaahaa.  Now he's getting desperate trying to nickel and dime the
>>discussion..

>Some would say those are the facts.  But you always have a problem
>with the facts don't you?

Not at all.  I had to drag the concept of "ambulances all over the city" out of
you.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2107932

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2016-05-17 02:43 -0400
Message-ID<hafljb53uuj18o82do8o4gikug5mmannkp@4ax.com>
In reply to#2107471
On Mon, 16 May 2016 13:23:02 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
alt.atheism with message-id
<er3kjblqqacpnv0l0mp9hehabbefa5oupn@4ax.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 15 May 2016 19:00:02 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 15 May 2016 16:17:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>alt.atheism with message-id
>><spphjb5t7toptspl6ph9nfjd5u2d14daif@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 14 May 2016 03:29:58 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:23:55 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>><8rkcjbh64ftvqaou9c61aqjmupl66eca8f@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 08:25:39 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 00:27:19 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 11 May 2016 14:07:28 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2016 00:19:22 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 07 May 2016 07:46:30 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> They weren't in a hospital.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>All Accident and Emergency departments are in hospitals here.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> That's not very wise.  We have emergency services all over the place.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>So do we in, the form of the ambulance service and their paramedics.
>>>>>>> Yet you said they were at hospitals only
>>>>>>An ambulance isn't a department, moron.
>>>>>
>>>>>I didn't say it was a department.  You said all emergencies services are at
>>>>>hospitals.  WE have emergency services available all over the city, especially
>>>>>in the form of ambulances.
>>>
>>>>Ambulances are not emergency services.  The Emergency Medical
>>>>Technicians that man ambulances only stabilize a victim for transport
>>>>to a hospital.
>>>
>>>Haahaahaa.  Now he's getting desperate trying to nickel and dime the
>>>discussion..
>
>>Some would say those are the facts.  But you always have a problem
>>with the facts don't you?
>
>Not at all.  I had to drag the concept of "ambulances all over the city" out of
>you.
>

Not me. But that has nothing to do with making ambulances emergency
services.

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2108014

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2016-05-17 06:41 -0500
Message-ID<aq0mjb1tdrml61c3ntp7c5h615ni8pm8qs@4ax.com>
In reply to#2107932
On Tue, 17 May 2016 02:43:34 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:

>On Mon, 16 May 2016 13:23:02 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>alt.atheism with message-id
><er3kjblqqacpnv0l0mp9hehabbefa5oupn@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 15 May 2016 19:00:02 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 15 May 2016 16:17:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>><spphjb5t7toptspl6ph9nfjd5u2d14daif@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 14 May 2016 03:29:58 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:23:55 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>><8rkcjbh64ftvqaou9c61aqjmupl66eca8f@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Thu, 12 May 2016 08:25:39 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2016 00:27:19 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 11 May 2016 14:07:28 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 May 2016 00:19:22 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 07 May 2016 07:46:30 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> They weren't in a hospital.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>All Accident and Emergency departments are in hospitals here.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> That's not very wise.  We have emergency services all over the place.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>So do we in, the form of the ambulance service and their paramedics.
>>>>>>>> Yet you said they were at hospitals only
>>>>>>>An ambulance isn't a department, moron.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I didn't say it was a department.  You said all emergencies services are at
>>>>>>hospitals.  WE have emergency services available all over the city, especially
>>>>>>in the form of ambulances.
>>>>
>>>>>Ambulances are not emergency services.  The Emergency Medical
>>>>>Technicians that man ambulances only stabilize a victim for transport
>>>>>to a hospital.
>>>>
>>>>Haahaahaa.  Now he's getting desperate trying to nickel and dime the
>>>>discussion..
>>
>>>Some would say those are the facts.  But you always have a problem
>>>with the facts don't you?
>>
>>Not at all.  I had to drag the concept of "ambulances all over the city" out of
>>you.

>Not me. But that has nothing to do with making ambulances emergency
>services.

Just going by the strange response he gave.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism


csiph-web