Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.atheism > #2090257 > unrolled thread

Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No?

Started by"Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com>
First post2016-04-14 12:41 -0400
Last post2016-04-28 19:18 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 82 — 18 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-14 12:41 -0400
    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-04-14 13:55 -0400
      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:53 -0700
        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:34 +0000
        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:58 -0400
    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:46 -0700
      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-15 09:50 -0400
        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-17 12:12 -0700
          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-17 17:57 -0700
    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:47 -0400
      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-21 15:51 -0500
        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 17:16 -0400
      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-21 22:19 -0400
        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-24 12:53 -0400
          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-24 13:54 -0400
          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-24 13:32 -0500
          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-24 23:06 -0700
            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 08:26 -0700
              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 09:47 -0700
                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-26 14:42 -0700
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-27 15:59 +0000
                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 14:47 -0700
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 18:47 -0400
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 18:57 -0700
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 03:34 -0400
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-28 15:05 +0000
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-28 11:53 -0500
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 10:59 -0700
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 14:32 -0600
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:07 -0400
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:25 -0700
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:37 -0400
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:48 -0700
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:23 -0500
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-04-29 14:45 -0600
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:06 -0500
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 00:25 -0700
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 11:16 -0700
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 14:30 -0600
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 13:54 -0700
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:22 -0700
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 16:12 -0600
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:41 -0700
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 21:35 -0700
                                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 23:51 -0600
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 16:05 -0600
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:13 -0400
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:10 -0400
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:00 -0700
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:17 -0400
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:36 -0700
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 03:39 -0400
                                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-29 00:45 -0700
                                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:11 +0000
                                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 13:18 -0400
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:04 +0000
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-04-29 17:50 -0400
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 16:59 +0000
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 16:29 -0700
              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 16:17 -0700
          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 16:46 -0500
            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 16:31 -0700
          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 16:09 -0700
            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 00:31 -0700
        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-28 08:18 -0500
          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 11:25 -0400
            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:27 -0500
              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 11:39 -0600
                Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:24 -0500
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:40 -0600
                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:11 -0500
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:06 +0000
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:56 -0500
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:01 +0000
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-03 11:55 -0600
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:05 +0000
                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:57 -0500
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:00 +0000
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? JimmyJohn <Non@Jtheist.net> - 2016-05-01 10:14 -0600
              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:18 -0400

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →


#2096803

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-04-27 15:59 +0000
Message-ID<nfqnl1$1hh5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#2096400
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:42:59 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

> The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >
>> > in the old days yous use to sit around the campfire and talk about
>> > the god of thunder, thor..
>> >
>> > yous haven't changed much today..
>> >
>> > now yous sit around the campfire talking about
>> >
>> > FLYING SAUCERS and
>> >
>> > aliens from outer space.
>> >
>> > You keep looking up in the sky searching for...
>> > someone watching you.
>> 
>> The truth is... yous people are still sitting around the campfire
>> making up stories..
>> 
>> now you call it science fiction and The Big Bang.
> 
> 
> yous make up stories about life on other planets and aliens....but where
> is the evidence?
> where is the proof??
> 
> you no difference from guys making up stories about god of thunder.

Or any other supposed god.
 
-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2096992

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-04-27 14:47 -0700
Message-ID<57213371.5135@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#2096803
i mean come on already...yous atheist and half belivers...


BE REAL!

Do you
see 
anything
in outer space..
or anywhere elsewhere 
in the universe..
like some kind of
mechanical machine
 that can
manufacture a rose???


or a bee?


Only God does stuff like that..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097024

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2016-04-27 18:47 -0400
Message-ID<qbg2ibh0urmk8kkggd0osudkodup177tuv@4ax.com>
In reply to#2096992
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:47:29 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<57213371.5135@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>i mean come on already...yous atheist and half belivers...
>
>
>BE REAL!
>
>Do you
>see 
>anything
>in outer space..
>or anywhere elsewhere 
>in the universe..
>like some kind of
>mechanical machine
> that can
>manufacture a rose???
>
>
>or a bee?
>
>
>Only God does stuff like that..

Which one?  Include supporting evidence please.

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097074

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-04-27 18:57 -0700
Message-ID<57216E1F.7D0A@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#2097024
Attila < wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:47:29 -0700, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
> <57213371.5135@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >i mean come on already...yous atheist and half belivers...
> >
> >
> >BE REAL!
> >
> >Do you
> >see
> >anything
> >in outer space..
> >or anywhere elsewhere
> >in the universe..
> >like some kind of
> >mechanical machine
> > that can
> >manufacture a rose???
> >
> >
> >or a bee?
> >
> >
> >Only God does stuff like that..
> 
> Which one?  

the right one.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097161

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2016-04-28 03:34 -0400
Message-ID<c7f3ib5vmuoab95m4h6t4ffpea3ketldh5@4ax.com>
In reply to#2097074
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:57:51 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<57216E1F.7D0A@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Attila < wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:47:29 -0700, The Starmaker
>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>> <57213371.5135@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >i mean come on already...yous atheist and half belivers...
>> >
>> >
>> >BE REAL!
>> >
>> >Do you
>> >see
>> >anything
>> >in outer space..
>> >or anywhere elsewhere
>> >in the universe..
>> >like some kind of
>> >mechanical machine
>> > that can
>> >manufacture a rose???
>> >
>> >
>> >or a bee?
>> >
>> >
>> >Only God does stuff like that..
>> 
>> Which one?  
>
>the right one.

Which one is that?  And why?  Please include supporting evidence.

Why did you clip my previous request for such evidence?

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097274

FromSmiler <smiler@jo.king>
Date2016-04-28 15:05 +0000
Message-ID<nft8rt$1qhk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#2096992
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:47:29 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

> i mean come on already...yous atheist and half belivers...
> 
> 
> BE REAL!
> 
> Do you see anything in outer space..
> or anywhere elsewhere in the universe..
> like some kind of mechanical machine
>  that can
> manufacture a rose???
> 
> or a bee?
> 
> Only God does stuff like that..

Like making things that fly...Until the Wright brothers.
Like curing diseases...Until modern medicine.
Like travelling in space...Until Uri Gagarin.
Like visiting other planets...Until Buzz Aldrin.

The gaps your supposed god hides in are getting smaller by the day.

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097319

FromChristopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net>
Date2016-04-28 11:53 -0500
Message-ID<urf4ibhun9ef1gtrc6fec2mi4mgmf2l9s3@4ax.com>
In reply to#2097274
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:05:33 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
wrote:

>On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:47:29 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
>
>> i mean come on already...yous atheist and half belivers...
>> 
>> 
>> BE REAL!
>> 
>> Do you see anything in outer space..
>> or anywhere elsewhere in the universe..
>> like some kind of mechanical machine
>>  that can
>> manufacture a rose???
>> 
>> or a bee?
>> 
>> Only God does stuff like that..

WHAT

FUCKING

GOD,

OUTSIDE

THE

IN-YOUR-FACE, 

QUESTION-BEGGING

MORON'S

RELIGION?

>Like making things that fly...Until the Wright brothers.
>Like curing diseases...Until modern medicine.
>Like travelling in space...Until Uri Gagarin.
>Like visiting other planets...Until Buzz Aldrin.
>
>The gaps your supposed god hides in are getting smaller by the day.

He's more than just borderline insane.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097355

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-04-28 10:59 -0700
Message-ID<57224F6D.1DC@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#2097274
A Nony Mouse wrote:
> 
> In article <3945809b-603d-42bb-9665-642c84eb95c4@googlegroups.com>,
>  Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > But the fact that there are many ideas about what God is does not deny his
> > actual existence.
> 
> Or hers, to its!
> 
> There is no reason but male egomania to suppose a god need be male!


God made man in his own image.



his
hiz/
determiner
possesive pronoun: his; possesive pronoun: His; determiner: His

    1.
    belonging to or associated with a male person

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097400

FromVirgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com>
Date2016-04-28 14:32 -0600
Message-ID<VIRGIL-45AFEA.14325728042016@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#2097355
In article <57224F6D.1DC@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> A Nony Mouse wrote:
> > 
> > In article <3945809b-603d-42bb-9665-642c84eb95c4@googlegroups.com>,
> >  Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > But the fact that there are many ideas about what God is does not deny his
> > > actual existence.
> > 
> > Or hers, to its!
> > 
> > There is no reason but male egomania to suppose a god need be male!
> 
> 
> God made man in his own image.
 
The evidence points the other way round, that men made gods in their own 
image.
-- 
Virgil
"Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097486

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2016-04-28 19:07 -0400
Message-ID<gt55iblg16ga42utb3s3n1vtr8e0cva4d0@4ax.com>
In reply to#2097355
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:59:09 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<57224F6D.1DC@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>A Nony Mouse wrote:
>> 
>> In article <3945809b-603d-42bb-9665-642c84eb95c4@googlegroups.com>,
>>  Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > But the fact that there are many ideas about what God is does not deny his
>> > actual existence.
>> 
>> Or hers, to its!
>> 
>> There is no reason but male egomania to suppose a god need be male!
>
>
>God made man in his own image.

Verified evidence?


--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097824

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-04-29 12:25 -0700
Message-ID<5723B521.2E9A@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#2097486
Attila < wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:59:09 -0700, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
> <57224F6D.1DC@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >A Nony Mouse wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <3945809b-603d-42bb-9665-642c84eb95c4@googlegroups.com>,
> >>  Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > But the fact that there are many ideas about what God is does not deny his
> >> > actual existence.
> >>
> >> Or hers, to its!
> >>
> >> There is no reason but male egomania to suppose a god need be male!
> >
> >
> >God made man in his own image.
> 
> Verified evidence?


Why do I need evidence if I already know it????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097850

FromAttila <<prochoice@here.now>
Date2016-04-29 16:37 -0400
Message-ID<nch7ibd75u3b1ts75e4hod1qaq02glsttu@4ax.com>
In reply to#2097824
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:25:21 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<5723B521.2E9A@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Attila < wrote:
>> 
>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:59:09 -0700, The Starmaker
>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>> <57224F6D.1DC@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >A Nony Mouse wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In article <3945809b-603d-42bb-9665-642c84eb95c4@googlegroups.com>,
>> >>  Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > But the fact that there are many ideas about what God is does not deny his
>> >> > actual existence.
>> >>
>> >> Or hers, to its!
>> >>
>> >> There is no reason but male egomania to suppose a god need be male!
>> >
>> >
>> >God made man in his own image.
>> 
>> Verified evidence?
>
>
>Why do I need evidence if I already know it????

So you are talking to yourself and you don't care if anyone else
believes you or not?

--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.

Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially 
those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.

Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government 
guaranteed above average income for every person.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification as the only option.

If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
before you run into me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097572

Fromje suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where>
Date2016-04-28 19:48 -0700
Message-ID<charlie-gordon1492-E4B7EF.19481628042016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>
In reply to#2097355
In article <57224F6D.1DC@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> A Nony Mouse wrote:
> > 
> > In article <3945809b-603d-42bb-9665-642c84eb95c4@googlegroups.com>,
> >  Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > But the fact that there are many ideas about what God is does not deny his
> > > actual existence.
> > 
> > Or hers, to its!
> > 
> > There is no reason but male egomania to suppose a god need be male!
> 
> 
> God made man in his own image.
> 
> 
> 
> his
> hiz/
> determiner
> possesive pronoun: his; possesive pronoun: His; determiner: His
> 
>     1.
>     belonging to or associated with a male person

In languages like french, the adjective agrees with its object, not its 
antecedent. L'homme a _sa_ chemise. La femme a _son_ chat. Since Genesis was not 
originally in english, english grammar is irrelevant to microparsing the text.

-- 
Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments
of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from
coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true
of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097795

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2016-04-29 13:23 -0500
Message-ID<6j97ibpspmqvbcpd2ro3gaq7cpn8pe7lnd@4ax.com>
In reply to#2097355
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:59:09 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:

>A Nony Mouse wrote:
>> 
>> In article <3945809b-603d-42bb-9665-642c84eb95c4@googlegroups.com>,
>>  Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > But the fact that there are many ideas about what God is does not deny his
>> > actual existence.
>> 
>> Or hers, to its!
>> 
>> There is no reason but male egomania to suppose a god need be male!

>God made man in his own image.

Yep, man is made in the image of Jesus.
>
>
>
>his
>hiz/
>determiner
>possesive pronoun: his; possesive pronoun: His; determiner: His
>
>    1.
>    belonging to or associated with a male person

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097854

FromSPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org>
Date2016-04-29 14:45 -0600
Message-ID<SPQR-7B46D1.14454829042016@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#2097795
In article <6j97ibpspmqvbcpd2ro3gaq7cpn8pe7lnd@4ax.com>,
 duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

> >God made man in his own image.
> 
> Yep, man is made in the image of Jesus.
 
Males wihout females never produce more males,
but there are species in which females produce more females without any 
males.

Thus there might be a goddess without a god able to produce us, but 
never a god without a goddess.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2098337

Fromduke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date2016-04-30 09:06 -0500
Message-ID<4se9ibpplhcm7pj1n9mk0alc3hodb057f8@4ax.com>
In reply to#2097854
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:45:48 -0600, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> wrote:

>In article <6j97ibpspmqvbcpd2ro3gaq7cpn8pe7lnd@4ax.com>,
> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> >God made man in his own image.
>> 
>> Yep, man is made in the image of Jesus.
> 
>Males wihout females never produce more males,
>but there are species in which females produce more females without any 
>males.

But other species are not made in the image of God.  For God made man dominate
over all the other creatures of the world, in the air and under the sea.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2099303

FromCloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com>
Date2016-05-02 00:25 -0700
Message-ID<e48d118e-12b5-49c0-90ee-33fb5c689640@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#2098337
On Saturday, April 30, 2016 at 7:06:49 AM UTC-7, duke wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:45:48 -0600, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> wrote:
> 
> >In article <6j97ibpspmqvbcpd2ro3gaq7cpn8pe7lnd@4ax.com>,
> > duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> >God made man in his own image.
> >> 
> >> Yep, man is made in the image of Jesus.
> > 
> >Males wihout females never produce more males,
> >but there are species in which females produce more females without any 
> >males.
> 
> But other species are not made in the image of God.  For God made man dominate
> over all the other creatures of the world, in the air and under the sea.
> 

Nothing is made in the image of something that does not exist.
No evidence exists that would lead one to believe there is a God.

How long since since you stopped beating your wife?

> the dukester, American-Atheist

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097362

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-04-28 11:16 -0700
Message-ID<57225360.6AFD@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#2096992
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> i mean come on already...yous atheist and half belivers...
> 
> BE REAL!
> 
> Do you
> see
> anything
> in outer space..
> or anywhere elsewhere
> in the universe..
> like some kind of
> mechanical machine
>  that can
> manufacture a rose???
> 
> or a bee?
> 
> Only God does stuff like that..



Look, every time science makes a new big discovery,
the bible speaks of it first.

Right now science is tryin to figure out..
'where did life come from'?

If those stupid guys would read the bible...
they would find the answer...then they can work
their way UP from there.


'where did life come from'????

"God formed the man from the dust of the ground"


Okay, it's simple...study "dust".


In other words..you can make a person from...dust!


Has anybody tried??


Maybe it's...stardust.


The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097397

FromWisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc>
Date2016-04-28 14:30 -0600
Message-ID<aaa-FE4B41.14303828042016@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#2097362
In article <57225360.6AFD@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:


> Look, every time science makes a new big discovery,
> the bible speaks of it first.

Internal combustion engines in the bible? 
Airplanes in The bible?
Radio in the bible?
Television in the bible? 
Rockets in the bible?
Etc.
Not in any bible I ever saw!

> The Starmaker

So make us some stars!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2097405

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-04-28 13:54 -0700
Message-ID<57227896.2F27@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#2097397
Wisely Non-Theist wrote:
> 
> In article <57225360.6AFD@ix.netcom.com>,
>  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> > Look, every time science makes a new big discovery,
> > the bible speaks of it first.
> 
> Internal combustion engines in the bible?
> Airplanes in The bible?
> Radio in the bible?
> Television in the bible?
> Rockets in the bible?
> Etc.
> Not in any bible I ever saw!
> 
> > The Starmaker


I already know you 'science guys' wish to take credit for *everything*
in the world, but you don't...

inovation by regular people invent things, not scientist. I can take a
piece of paper and fold
it and watch it fly...that's not science inventions.

i shot an arrow in the air...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism


csiph-web