Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2080744 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-03-28 17:55 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 322 — 35 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-27 16:37 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 04:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 13:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 14:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 17:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:56 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 10:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-04-05 18:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-04-06 18:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 23:29 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-04-06 18:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-04-08 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-11 00:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 08:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 16:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 20:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-04-13 14:17 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-04-14 10:44 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-10 22:01 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:09 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:40 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:51 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:49 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:29 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:32 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 13:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:25 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 14:33 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-04-10 08:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-04-10 08:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-04-12 10:38 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-04-13 15:19 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:26 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 17:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-29 04:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 05:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-30 03:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 12:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-31 09:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 11:08 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-30 09:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-31 08:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 10:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-31 14:19 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-30 12:01 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-31 20:34 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-31 14:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:46 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-31 08:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-31 09:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-31 17:54 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 11:14 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 18:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:15 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 05:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-30 09:50 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 15:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 14:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 04:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 09:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 16:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 23:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-02 21:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-02 22:17 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-02 23:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-02 23:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-03 03:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-13 10:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-13 16:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-04-13 15:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-13 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-04-13 18:30 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-04-13 18:35 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-04-14 15:09 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:09 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 15:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-14 11:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:58 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-14 12:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-04-14 13:55 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:34 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-15 09:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-17 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-17 17:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-21 15:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 17:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-21 22:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-24 12:53 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-24 13:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-24 13:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-24 23:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 08:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 09:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-26 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-27 15:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 14:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 18:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 03:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-28 15:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-28 11:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 10:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 14:32 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:37 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-04-29 14:45 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 00:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 11:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 14:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 13:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 16:12 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:41 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 21:35 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 23:51 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 16:05 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:13 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:10 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:36 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 03:39 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-29 00:45 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 13:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-04-29 17:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 16:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 16:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 16:17 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 16:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 16:31 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 16:09 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 00:31 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-28 08:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 11:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 11:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:40 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:01 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-03 11:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? JimmyJohn <Non@Jtheist.net> - 2016-05-01 10:14 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 18:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 21:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 21:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 12:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 05:15 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 17:55 -0700
Page 16 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 Next page →
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 16:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ng599c$1gcp$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2098923 |
On Sun, 01 May 2016 09:56:43 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:06:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 09:11:28 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:40:07 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: >>> >>>>In article <gm97ibhphdv41oupbgbvc153kgc1ljncbf@4ax.com>, >>>> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I >>>>> >> >>>> think that logically it's impossible >>>>> > >>>>> >An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! >>>>> >>>>> If he wanted to, he would. >>>> >>>>If "The" god were male there would be no humans. >>> >>> stupid comment. >> >>That's all we ever get from you. > > Well, it does take intelligence on your part to understand. So I can > accept what problems you are having. I perfectly well understand that you're an idiot, no problem. > ***** > "Idiocy is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <c1phiblfgucmflljpsegpa4ckv8n2mt6ia@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2098954 |
On Sun, 1 May 2016 16:01:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 01 May 2016 09:56:43 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:06:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 09:11:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:40:07 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>In article <gm97ibhphdv41oupbgbvc153kgc1ljncbf@4ax.com>, >>>>> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I >>>>>> >> >>>> think that logically it's impossible >>>>>> > >>>>>> >An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! >>>>>> >>>>>> If he wanted to, he would. >>>>> >>>>>If "The" god were male there would be no humans. >>>> >>>> stupid comment. >>> >>>That's all we ever get from you. >> >> Well, it does take intelligence on your part to understand. So I can >> accept what problems you are having. > >I perfectly well understand that you're an idiot, no problem. Idiots don't turn to God. Idiots stick with satan. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-03 11:55 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <aaa-7A9112.11555303052016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #2099971 |
In article <c1phiblfgucmflljpsegpa4ckv8n2mt6ia@4ax.com>, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > Idiots don't turn to God. Idiots stick with satan. > > the dukester, American-American What sort of a god is unable to eliminate any such satan? Not a god that anyone can trust to get things right!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 17:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ng2ok2$1vsk$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2097796 |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:24:55 -0500, duke wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:39:01 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: > >>In article <1fe4ib58hr6vs7p3fidqp9f9s1eekr13k0@4ax.com>, >> duck <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:25:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:18:09 -0500, bilgat@m.nu in alt.atheism with >>> >message-id <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >>On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" >>> >><seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>>On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>> >>>> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, >>> >>>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, >>> >>>>> they'll have to show me directly, because they made sure I was >>> >>>>> raised in a way that made just believing in them without >>> >>>>> evidence (and old books without scientific backing aren't >>> >>>>> evidence) impossible. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think >>> >>>> that logically it's impossible >> >>An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! > > If he wanted to, he would. He wants us tempted so he can see which way > we turn. Prove it. > ***** > "Ignorance is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 09:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <m96cib5788j333d25b9kjhte289qlp1e77@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2098423 |
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:05:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:24:55 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:39:01 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: >> >>>In article <1fe4ib58hr6vs7p3fidqp9f9s1eekr13k0@4ax.com>, >>> duck <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:25:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:18:09 -0500, bilgat@m.nu in alt.atheism with >>>> >message-id <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" >>>> >><seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>>On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>> >>>> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, >>>> >>>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, >>>> >>>>> they'll have to show me directly, because they made sure I was >>>> >>>>> raised in a way that made just believing in them without >>>> >>>>> evidence (and old books without scientific backing aren't >>>> >>>>> evidence) impossible. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think >>>> >>>> that logically it's impossible >>> >>>An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! >> >> If he wanted to, he would. He wants us tempted so he can see which way >> we turn. > >Prove it. Check out A&E. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 16:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ng5964$1gcp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2098924 |
On Sun, 01 May 2016 09:57:08 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:05:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:24:55 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:39:01 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: >>> >>>>In article <1fe4ib58hr6vs7p3fidqp9f9s1eekr13k0@4ax.com>, >>>> duck <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:25:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:18:09 -0500, bilgat@m.nu in alt.atheism with >>>>> >message-id <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >>On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" >>>>> >><seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>> >>>> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>> >>>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, >>>>> >>>>> they'll have to show me directly, because they made sure I was >>>>> >>>>> raised in a way that made just believing in them without >>>>> >>>>> evidence (and old books without scientific backing aren't >>>>> >>>>> evidence) impossible. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I >>>>> >>>> think that logically it's impossible >>>> >>>>An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! >>> >>> If he wanted to, he would. He wants us tempted so he can see which >>> way we turn. >> >>Prove it. > > Check out A&E. The Accident and Emergency department at my local hospital doesn't need checking. > ***** > "Masturbation is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <53phibpi5ua9mh97a3r4d3lg038bslao25@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2098950 |
On Sun, 1 May 2016 16:00:04 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 01 May 2016 09:57:08 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:05:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:24:55 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:39:01 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>In article <1fe4ib58hr6vs7p3fidqp9f9s1eekr13k0@4ax.com>, >>>>> duck <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:25:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:18:09 -0500, bilgat@m.nu in alt.atheism with >>>>>> >message-id <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" >>>>>> >><seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>> >>>> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>> >>>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, >>>>>> >>>>> they'll have to show me directly, because they made sure I was >>>>>> >>>>> raised in a way that made just believing in them without >>>>>> >>>>> evidence (and old books without scientific backing aren't >>>>>> >>>>> evidence) impossible. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I >>>>>> >>>> think that logically it's impossible >>>>> >>>>>An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! >>>> >>>> If he wanted to, he would. He wants us tempted so he can see which >>>> way we turn. >>> >>>Prove it. >> >> Check out A&E. > >The Accident and Emergency department at my local hospital doesn't need >checking. Check out the first one. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JimmyJohn <Non@Jtheist.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 10:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <tNmdnfxoIJfNtrvKnZ2dnUU7-U-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #2098924 |
In article <m96cib5788j333d25b9kjhte289qlp1e77@4ax.com>, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:05:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > > >On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:24:55 -0500, duke wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:39:01 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: > >> > >>>In article <1fe4ib58hr6vs7p3fidqp9f9s1eekr13k0@4ax.com>, > >>> duck <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:25:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> >On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:18:09 -0500, bilgat@m.nu in alt.atheism with > >>>> >message-id <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> >>On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" > >>>> >><seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >>>On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: > >>>> >>>> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, > >>>> >>>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, > >>>> >>>>> they'll have to show me directly, because they made sure I was > >>>> >>>>> raised in a way that made just believing in them without > >>>> >>>>> evidence (and old books without scientific backing aren't > >>>> >>>>> evidence) impossible. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think > >>>> >>>> that logically it's impossible > >>> > >>>An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! > >> > >> If he wanted to, he would. He wants us tempted so he can see which way > >> we turn. > > > >Prove it. > > Chuck it out!. > > the Suckster, Armenian-Armenian ` -- Science is based directly on objective physical evidence, and nothing that is not based directly on objective physical evidence can be science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 19:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qg65ibtd4f6jgkkrku4i4ddv6fpdm97l4u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2097305 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:27:35 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <1fe4ib58hr6vs7p3fidqp9f9s1eekr13k0@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:25:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:18:09 -0500, bilgat@m.nu in alt.atheism with >>message-id <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" >>><seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll >>>>>> have to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a >>>>>> way that made just believing in them without evidence (and old >>>>>> books without scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible. >>>>> >>>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think >>>>> that logically it's impossible >>>> >>>> >>>> If God is literally omnipotent, He knows how to convince me. There will >>>>be some set of events and words that can do so, even if they're ones >>>>that no mortal could think of or arrange. >>> >>> >>>I hear a clock somewhere >>> >>>Coo Coo Coo Coo >> >>Hardly a reasonable answer. > >I know him well. That's the best he can do. > He sounds like a friend of your's. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 18:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <570EF4D1.4AFB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2089814 |
Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote: > > On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> alt.atheism with message-id > >> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: > >> > >>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? > >>> > >>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. > >> > >> More superstition-based threats. > > > > Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't win. > > You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the > guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects > of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should > anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same > problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). > > Besides, it's not "God". It's "Zod". Kneel! > > -- > Sea Wasp > /^\ > ;;; > Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog: > http://seawasp.livejournal.com God didn't write The New Testament, so it is not God's interpretation.. Jesus wasn't alive either when the New Testament was writtenm which was around 50 later after AD.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 21:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <jo5ugb99fvobj5fvg6ks1mmp1vuhqpajg8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2089973 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:39:29 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote: >> >> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: >> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> >> alt.atheism with message-id >> >> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? >> >>> >> >>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. >> >> >> >> More superstition-based threats. >> > >> > Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't win. >> >> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the >> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects >> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should >> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same >> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). >> >> Besides, it's not "God". It's "Zod". Kneel! >> >> -- >> Sea Wasp >> /^\ >> ;;; >> Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog: >> http://seawasp.livejournal.com > >God didn't write The New Testament, so it is not God's interpretation.. > >Jesus wasn't alive either when the New Testament was writtenm which was >around 50 later after AD. Do you have any evidence there was a New Testament about 50 AD. As it is written now I thought was formed by committee about 323 AD?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 21:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <570F1B04.7645@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2090034 |
MattB wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:39:29 -0700, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote: > >> > >> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: > >> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? > >> >>> > >> >>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. > >> >> > >> >> More superstition-based threats. > >> > > >> > Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't win. > >> > >> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the > >> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects > >> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should > >> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same > >> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). > >> > >> Besides, it's not "God". It's "Zod". Kneel! > >> > >> -- > >> Sea Wasp > >> /^\ > >> ;;; > >> Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog: > >> http://seawasp.livejournal.com > > > >God didn't write The New Testament, so it is not God's interpretation.. > > > >Jesus wasn't alive either when the New Testament was writtenm which was > >around 50 later after AD. > > Do you have any evidence there was a New Testament about 50 AD. As it > is written now I thought was formed by committee about 323 AD? I meant 50 years After Jesus died was when the New Testament had begun to be written. It's the story of Jesus Crist written by a few guys who knew him then. How could anybody write about somebody that knew Jesus 323 years later????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 12:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <koivgblbsmdlhph815ku962968nkn9spl1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2090036 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 21:22:28 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >MattB wrote: >> >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:39:29 -0700, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> >Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote: >> >> >> >> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> >> >> alt.atheism with message-id >> >> >> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. >> >> >> >> >> >> More superstition-based threats. >> >> > >> >> > Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't win. >> >> >> >> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the >> >> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects >> >> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should >> >> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same >> >> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). >> >> >> >> Besides, it's not "God". It's "Zod". Kneel! >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sea Wasp >> >> /^\ >> >> ;;; >> >> Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog: >> >> http://seawasp.livejournal.com >> > >> >God didn't write The New Testament, so it is not God's interpretation.. >> > >> >Jesus wasn't alive either when the New Testament was writtenm which was >> >around 50 later after AD. >> >> Do you have any evidence there was a New Testament about 50 AD. As it >> is written now I thought was formed by committee about 323 AD? > >I meant 50 years After Jesus died was when the New Testament had begun >to be written. > >It's the story of Jesus Crist written by a few guys who knew him then. Even that's terribly wrong. The 4 gospels are the actions and words by Jesus in 30-33AD and experienced by thousands of people all talking about what they heard and saw, and including the many new religious ways of life given by the Son of God to man for the next number of years after the cross, and then the some men recorded what they were all saying. Thus the 4 gospels were fully prepared in writing within 30 years after the cross as given by thousands as eye witnesses. >How could anybody write about somebody that knew Jesus 323 years >later???? Firewater is really stupid the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 12:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <72rvgbhk1stfe99492h84e3k84f3aoprej@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2090271 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:01:12 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 21:22:28 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> >wrote: > >>MattB wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:39:29 -0700, The Starmaker >>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> >>> >Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: >>> >> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>> >> >> alt.atheism with message-id >>> >> >> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> More superstition-based threats. >>> >> > >>> >> > Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't win. >>> >> >>> >> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the >>> >> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects >>> >> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should >>> >> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same >>> >> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). >>> >> >>> >> Besides, it's not "God". It's "Zod". Kneel! >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Sea Wasp >>> >> /^\ >>> >> ;;; >>> >> Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog: >>> >> http://seawasp.livejournal.com >>> > >>> >God didn't write The New Testament, so it is not God's interpretation.. >>> > >>> >Jesus wasn't alive either when the New Testament was writtenm which was >>> >around 50 later after AD. >>> >>> Do you have any evidence there was a New Testament about 50 AD. As it >>> is written now I thought was formed by committee about 323 AD? >> >>I meant 50 years After Jesus died was when the New Testament had begun >>to be written. >> >>It's the story of Jesus Crist written by a few guys who knew him then. > >Even that's terribly wrong. The 4 gospels are the actions and words by Jesus in >30-33AD and experienced by thousands of people all talking about what they heard >and saw, and including the many new religious ways of life given by the Son of >God to man for the next number of years after the cross, and then the some men >recorded what they were all saying. Thus the 4 gospels were fully prepared in >writing within 30 years after the cross as given by thousands as eye witnesses. Prove it. Betting you can't. > >>How could anybody write about somebody that knew Jesus 323 years >>later???? > >Firewater is really stupid Yes everyone knows I'm Native American now move on. > >the dukester, American-American > >***** >"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." >Pope Paul VI >*****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 12:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <570FF4EF.61A9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2090349 |
MattB wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:01:12 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > > >On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 21:22:28 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> > >wrote: > > > >>MattB wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:39:29 -0700, The Starmaker > >>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> >Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: > >>> >> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>> >> >> alt.atheism with message-id > >>> >> >> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> More superstition-based threats. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't win. > >>> >> > >>> >> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the > >>> >> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects > >>> >> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should > >>> >> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same > >>> >> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). > >>> >> > >>> >> Besides, it's not "God". It's "Zod". Kneel! > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> Sea Wasp > >>> >> /^\ > >>> >> ;;; > >>> >> Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog: > >>> >> http://seawasp.livejournal.com > >>> > > >>> >God didn't write The New Testament, so it is not God's interpretation.. > >>> > > >>> >Jesus wasn't alive either when the New Testament was writtenm which was > >>> >around 50 later after AD. > >>> > >>> Do you have any evidence there was a New Testament about 50 AD. As it > >>> is written now I thought was formed by committee about 323 AD? > >> > >>I meant 50 years After Jesus died was when the New Testament had begun > >>to be written. > >> > >>It's the story of Jesus Crist written by a few guys who knew him then. > > > >Even that's terribly wrong. The 4 gospels are the actions and words by Jesus in > >30-33AD and experienced by thousands of people all talking about what they heard > >and saw, and including the many new religious ways of life given by the Son of > >God to man for the next number of years after the cross, and then the some men > >recorded what they were all saying. Thus the 4 gospels were fully prepared in > >writing within 30 years after the cross as given by thousands as eye witnesses. > > Prove it. Betting you can't. You mean "Prove it, I'm still waiting for the proof or evidence." (that's the atheist mantra) This is what is written on an atheist tombstone: "Prove it, I'm still waiting for the proof or evidence."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 23:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nep8vq$ct2$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2090373 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:52:15 -0700, The Starmaker wrote: > MattB wrote: <snip> >> Prove it. Betting you can't. > > You mean "Prove it, I'm still waiting for the proof or evidence." > (that's the atheist mantra) > > This is what is written on an atheist tombstone: "Prove it, I'm still > waiting for the proof or evidence." You have still not presented any evidence. More evidence that you have no evidence. Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 12:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <570FF445.1136@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2090271 |
duke wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 21:22:28 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> > wrote: > > >MattB wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:39:29 -0700, The Starmaker > >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: > >> >> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> >> >> alt.atheism with message-id > >> >> >> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> More superstition-based threats. > >> >> > > >> >> > Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't win. > >> >> > >> >> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the > >> >> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects > >> >> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should > >> >> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same > >> >> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). > >> >> > >> >> Besides, it's not "God". It's "Zod". Kneel! > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Sea Wasp > >> >> /^\ > >> >> ;;; > >> >> Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog: > >> >> http://seawasp.livejournal.com > >> > > >> >God didn't write The New Testament, so it is not God's interpretation.. > >> > > >> >Jesus wasn't alive either when the New Testament was writtenm which was > >> >around 50 later after AD. > >> > >> Do you have any evidence there was a New Testament about 50 AD. As it > >> is written now I thought was formed by committee about 323 AD? > > > >I meant 50 years After Jesus died was when the New Testament had begun > >to be written. > > > >It's the story of Jesus Crist written by a few guys who knew him then. > > Even that's terribly wrong. The 4 gospels are the actions and words by Jesus in > 30-33AD and experienced by thousands of people all talking about what they heard > and saw, and including the many new religious ways of life given by the Son of > God to man for the next number of years after the cross, and then the some men > recorded what they were all saying. Thus the 4 gospels were fully prepared in > writing within 30 years after the cross as given by thousands as eye witnesses. > > >How could anybody write about somebody that knew Jesus 323 years > >later???? > > Firewater is really stupid > > the dukester, American-American > > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > ***** I wrote: "around 50 later after AD" "around" means 'around', not necessarly 50.,,just around it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 12:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <uoqvgbd0fop4fv61a1ej61f8kg91g5av14@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2090036 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 21:22:28 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >MattB wrote: >> >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:39:29 -0700, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> >Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote: >> >> >> >> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> >> >> alt.atheism with message-id >> >> >> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. >> >> >> >> >> >> More superstition-based threats. >> >> > >> >> > Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't win. >> >> >> >> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the >> >> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects >> >> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should >> >> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same >> >> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). >> >> >> >> Besides, it's not "God". It's "Zod". Kneel! >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sea Wasp >> >> /^\ >> >> ;;; >> >> Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog: >> >> http://seawasp.livejournal.com >> > >> >God didn't write The New Testament, so it is not God's interpretation.. >> > >> >Jesus wasn't alive either when the New Testament was writtenm which was >> >around 50 later after AD. >> >> Do you have any evidence there was a New Testament about 50 AD. As it >> is written now I thought was formed by committee about 323 AD? > >I meant 50 years After Jesus died was when the New Testament had begun >to be written. Yes I've heard that. They were very old for that time. > >It's the story of Jesus Crist written by a few guys who knew him then. Paul never met Jesus. > >How could anybody write about somebody that knew Jesus 323 years >later???? That was when the RCC decided what to place in the NT. It was made into a book form.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 11:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <38ivgbdtsj3klum6v6slhjb6tf8hjarmpu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2089814 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:25:10 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: >On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>> alt.atheism with message-id >>> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? >>>> >>>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. >>> >>> More superstition-based threats. >> >> Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't win. > > You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the >guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Not true. He specifically sent his Son, Jesus, to reveal that very thing to us. And when Jesus ascended to the Father, the Holy Spirit has been active in the world ever since continuing the message. >Given how many sects >of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should >anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same >problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). Wow, you really that dumb? There is only one bible from God almighty, one interpretation only, many versions which is only a language change issue. And, TO BOOT, every other Christian sect, and their bible in use, are known for that which they refuse to follow in the one message from God. You're none too bright, little fellah. Take 6 months vacation form the bible then quit altogether. > > Besides, it's not "God". It's "Zod". Kneel! the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 23:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nep9mt$ct2$9@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2090266 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:50:27 -0500, duke wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:25:10 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" > <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > >>On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: >>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? >>>>> >>>>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. >>>> >>>> More superstition-based threats. >>> >>> Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you >>> can't win. >> >> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the >>guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. > > Not true. He specifically sent his Son, Jesus, to reveal that very > thing to us. No evidence of your supposed Jesus character exists. > And when Jesus ascended to the Father, the Holy Spirit has been active > in the world ever since continuing the message. Gibberish. >>Given how many sects of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, >>exist, why should anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say >>"The Bible" -- same problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations >>of it). > > Wow, you really that dumb? > > There is only one bible from God almighty, That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > one interpretation only, many > versions which is only a language change issue. Merely your stupid, unevidenced belief. > And, TO BOOT, every other Christian sect, and their bible in use, are > known for that which they refuse to follow in the one message from God. > > You're none too bright, little fellah. Take 6 months vacation form the > bible then quit altogether. Since when has reading been believing? > ***** > "Masturbation is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 16 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web