Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2073756 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-13 15:22 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-18 22:04 -0800 |
| Articles | 7 on this page of 27 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-13 15:22 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Greywolf <greywolftheatheist@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 15:43 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-13 16:33 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-14 07:30 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-15 22:07 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 12:00 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 12:00 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-03-16 05:35 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-13 23:39 +0000
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-17 12:12 -0500
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2016-03-13 21:42 -0400
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 16:48 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-03-13 17:15 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... MarkA <someone@somewhere.invalid> - 2016-03-14 00:21 +0000
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Malcolm McMahon <malcolm@theriomorph.me.uk> - 2016-03-14 11:06 +0000
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 21:04 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 11:37 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Vincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com> - 2016-03-14 17:50 -0400
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 14:26 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:17 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:18 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 12:02 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 09:16 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 11:07 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:20 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:42 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-18 22:04 -0800
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 20:18 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <ncbioe$c5t$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2075107 |
On 3/16/2016 8:17 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > On 3/15/2016 5:50 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote: >> >> You mean "Dr. Einstein." He did have a doctorate, you know. >> > > He's still a Mr. not a Ms. or Mrs.! :) > Grammar: He's still a Mr. not a Ms. nor Mrs.! :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 20:03:01 up 17:07 0 users load average: 1.09 1.06 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-14 12:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56E718C2.11E0@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2073756 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Theory of Everything.....is God. > > Isn't it? If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 09:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56E84357.6B62@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2074043 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Theory of Everything.....is God. > > > > Isn't it? > > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window. and that includes 'the scientific methods' also. And those who require...evidence a visible sign of something (it's not visible, dummie) material that is presented to a court of law to help find the truth about something (God doesn't do jury duty) something which shows that something else exists (yous don't even know what existence means) http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evidence throw the requiment of 'evidence' out the window also! Now, that I threw out all the garbage... Where do you start?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 11:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56E85D78.4139@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2074585 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Theory of Everything.....is God. > > > > > > Isn't it? > > > > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window. > > and that includes 'the scientific methods' also. > > And those who require...evidence > > a visible sign of something (it's not visible, dummie) > > material that is presented to a court of law to help find the truth about something (God doesn't do jury duty) > > something which shows that something else exists (yous don't even know what existence means) > > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evidence > > throw the requiment of 'evidence' out the window also! > > Now, that I threw out all the garbage... > > Where do you start? i might have to throw out 'logic' also because that appears to an invention of man... Do you know any girls who are logical??? They are certaintly known to be...irrational. Let me rephrase... i might have to throw out 'logic' also because that appears to an invention of mEn...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 20:20 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <ncbirt$c5t$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2074043 |
On 3/15/2016 4:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window. > WRONG!!!! To really understand science and Gods, you need ultimate rationalism, or you might burn another St. Joan of Arc! BTW, there is actually a compression method called "arc", program named PKARC! :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 20:03:01 up 17:07 0 users load average: 1.09 1.06 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 23:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56EA5FCC.4C9C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2075109 |
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > > On 3/15/2016 4:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window. > > > > WRONG!!!! To really understand science and Gods, you need ultimate > rationalism, or you might burn another St. Joan of Arc! rationalism is just a small part...it is not everything. for example...are your dreams rational?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 22:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56ECEBFF.199A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #2075638 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > > > > On 3/15/2016 4:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window. > > > > > > > WRONG!!!! To really understand science and Gods, you need ultimate > > rationalism, or you might burn another St. Joan of Arc! > > rationalism is just a small part...it is not everything. > > for example...are your dreams rational? what i mean is... there are 24 hours a day.. 8 hours is spent having dreams that seem to make no sense.. the lights don't even work. the other 8 hours is spent on how may rational hours? what about the other 8 hours? thta is spent on murders, drugs, violence, dancing, watching 8 hours of tv, and who knows wat else you people do in those hours? So, that leaves less than 8 hours of rationalism. Dreams are just...hallucinations. Some of yous are probably hallucinating right now and not even dreaming...
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web