Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #1930579 > unrolled thread
| Started by | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-23 17:13 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-06-26 17:37 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 378 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-23 17:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-24 00:22 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-24 14:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-24 14:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-25 13:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-24 21:48 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-25 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-25 21:35 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-26 17:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-27 19:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-28 17:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-29 20:05 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-29 17:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-30 08:43 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-29 17:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-30 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-04 08:30 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-04 08:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-05 08:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 08:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 06:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 10:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 10:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 08:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 11:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 10:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 12:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 14:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 18:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 21:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 08:45 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-07-10 06:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:45 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 21:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-06 17:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:03 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 07:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 10:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:57 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 10:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 12:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 10:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-07 23:55 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-09 04:46 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-09 01:41 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-09 23:10 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:13 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:40 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-07 17:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 18:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 17:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:54 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:54 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 18:35 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 17:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:21 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-05 14:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-05 20:00 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-05 18:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 20:59 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-07 17:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 11:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 11:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 23:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 06:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 08:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 07:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 08:42 -0400
Re: "Believers" won't go to heaven. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 06:22 -0400
Re: "Believers" won't go to heaven. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 06:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 09:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:14 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 10:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 10:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 07:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:53 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.nut> - 2015-07-10 13:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 09:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-10 14:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 17:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 17:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 17:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 17:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 08:51 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 16:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 11:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 20:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 10:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 21:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 21:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 23:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:35 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 18:03 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-07 20:29 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 21:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 09:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 10:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 13:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 00:37 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 12:36 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 10:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 14:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 14:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 12:54 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 10:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 21:02 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-08 18:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:50 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-09 17:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 16:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 00:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 19:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 13:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:01 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 09:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-10 15:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:49 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 00:09 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-08 14:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:43 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-08 16:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:19 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:21 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-10 00:13 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 19:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 18:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 14:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 20:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 11:35 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 11:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 12:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 13:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 14:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 19:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:59 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 07:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 21:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 23:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-09 00:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:55 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-06 18:37 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 01:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:05 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:02 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 09:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 13:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 12:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 14:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 16:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:08 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:28 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-06 07:48 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 18:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 20:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 12:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 03:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 19:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 15:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 09:06 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 07:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-07 08:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:40 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 22:24 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 07:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:04 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 10:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 17:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:41 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 22:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.nut> - 2015-07-10 13:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 07:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:44 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 22:37 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:49 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:40 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-10 14:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-07 11:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-06 21:09 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 05:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 08:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 10:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-30 07:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-25 23:11 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-26 21:52 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-26 17:37 -0500
Page 14 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 19 Next page →
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 23:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <22urpa9a1dnqirog7t5imms9qk34e8s4tb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1939008 |
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 21:10:06 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Jeanne Douglas wrote: >> >> In article <mnhk9h$5og$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:40:39 -0500, Gordon wrote: >> > >> > > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >> > > <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> > > >> > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> > >> >> > >>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >> > >>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >> > >>>>wrote: >> > >>>> >> > > <snip> >> > >>>> >> > >>>>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? >> > >>> >> > >>>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is actually >> > >>>making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when all the >> > >>>while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so funny to >> > >>>watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a maze . >> > >> >> > >>I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being a >> > >>deliberately annoying jerk. >> > >> >> > > My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow >> > > this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an >> > > atheist. >> >> <piggybacking> >> >> What the FUCK are you talking about Gordon? Nobody DECIDES to become an >> atheist; one either believes in a god or one doesn't, no decision >> necessary. > >People don't just believe in God...they come to believe in God, or they lose their belief in God, like Charles Darwin did >after his daughter died. > >Atheist appear to be....mad at God. > >Atheist make God appear to be Al Capone! no atheist are not mad at an non existent being atheists are mad at the priests and prechears that molest children and at the bishops and popes that have started wars that killed millions
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 00:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <559E2355.3342@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #1939023 |
bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 21:10:06 -0700, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >Jeanne Douglas wrote: > >> > >> In article <mnhk9h$5og$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:40:39 -0500, Gordon wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > >> > > <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > >> > >>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> > >> > >>>>wrote: > >> > >>>> > >> > > <snip> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? > >> > >>> > >> > >>>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is actually > >> > >>>making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when all the > >> > >>>while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so funny to > >> > >>>watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a maze . > >> > >> > >> > >>I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being a > >> > >>deliberately annoying jerk. > >> > >> > >> > > My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow > >> > > this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an > >> > > atheist. > >> > >> <piggybacking> > >> > >> What the FUCK are you talking about Gordon? Nobody DECIDES to become an > >> atheist; one either believes in a god or one doesn't, no decision > >> necessary. > > > >People don't just believe in God...they come to believe in God, or they lose their belief in God, like Charles Darwin did > >after his daughter died. > > > >Atheist appear to be....mad at God. > > > >Atheist make God appear to be Al Capone! > > no atheist are not mad at an non existent being > atheists are mad at the priests and prechears that molest children > and at the bishops and popes that have started wars that killed > millions You left out rabbi https://www.google.com/#q=rabbi+arrested and you left out as Mel Gibson would say: "The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.” https://www.google.com/#q=mel+gibson+jews+start+all+the+wars You been watching too many Hollywood tv shows and movies. You have a Hollywood point of view of the world...not the real world. The Starmaker What is "an non existent being"? A being means, ...it exist. Do you have any proof that a mind exist?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 13:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lv7opadc4qaunve072no09vrmtgvn1ipkm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938213 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:24:44 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Wrong - a triune Godhead <= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>>>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>>>> >>>>>>You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>>>space/time we occupy. But, God is not restricted thusly and our human >>>>>>minds aren't capable of all that is associated with God's space/time. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>listen to the particle physicist, boy gordo you are trying seriously >>>>>to bullshit you way into an imaginary heaven. You are as stupid as >>>>>dookie. and just for your information what you classify as three >>>>>dimensional space/time is actually 4 dimensions. WTG smart guy. and >>>>>actually a godlike being would be a zero dimensional being. so a god >>>>>would not even know that humans existed nor the universe or anything >>>>>else in it. WTG smart guy!!! >>>>> >>>>Review this Bible passage: >>> >>>Why, moron? >>> >>>Why do you imagine any non-Christian should take it seriously. let >>>alone an atheist whom you know isn't a Christian? >>> >>>[irrelevant Bible verses rudely and stupidly posted where the psycho >>>knows his involuntary audience isn't even Christian, deleted] >>> >>>>Note that Satan >>> >>>WHAT FUCKING SATAN, imbecile? >>> >>>What part of "atheist" are you still pretending you are too stupid to >>>understand? >>> >>>> mentions only two dimensions. He is here among us in >>>>two dimensional form but we cannot perceive him, objectively. >>> >>>Either prove it or keep your mind-boggling stupidity to yourself. >>> >>>Hint: you're not stupid because you're a Christian, but because you >>>keep presuming the same old nonsense where you know your involuntary >>>audience isn't Christian, and for the crassness of your "arguments". >>> >>>Keep it to yourself, and nobody would know just how stupid you are, >>>which is better than telling us at every opportunity. >>> >>>>Label our space dimensions W, X & Y then label Satan's >>> >>>WHAT FUCKING SATAN? >>> >>>> space >>>>dimensions X, Y & Z. He can move around freely in his space but >>>>occupies only two of our spatial dimensions. >>> >>>What a fucking moron. >>> >>>>Think of a deck of cards with all the red cards less than a Planck >>>>Length >>> >>>You don't even know what Planck measurement is. >>> >>>> in thickness and all the black cards just a bit more than a >>>>Planck length in thickness. With this deck of cards arranged such the >>>>red and black cards alternate uniformly throughout the deck, would a >>>>microbe on one of the black cards be able to see any of the red cards? >>>>God >>> >>>WHAT FUCKING GOD? >>> >>>> occupies another set of spatial dimensions V, W & X and is here in >>>>our space dimensions in two dimensional form. >>> >>>Was this meant to make any sense? >>> >>>And how does talking down at us as if you had already demonstrate it, >>>discharge your burden of proof, question-begging moron? >>> >>>>But, both God and Satan >>> >>>WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN? >>> >>>> can perceive our other space dimension >>>>somewhat like we see a hologram. >>> >>>Idiot. >>> >>>> If we could work beneath the Planck >>>>Length >>> >>>Idiot. >>> >>>> we could see both God and Satan, >>> >>>WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN? >>> >>>> but we are restricted from >>>>doing so for the time being. >>> >>>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? >> >>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is >>actually making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when >>all the while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so >>funny to watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a >>maze . > >I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being >a deliberately annoying jerk. perhaps but I still picture him as a retarded mouse lost in a maze that is actually just an empty box
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 13:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <u18opah67j99d6sof0ugm8h33r6jvlpehh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938213 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:24:44 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Wrong - a triune Godhead <= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>>>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>>>> >>>>>>You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>>>space/time we occupy. But, God is not restricted thusly and our human >>>>>>minds aren't capable of all that is associated with God's space/time. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>listen to the particle physicist, boy gordo you are trying seriously >>>>>to bullshit you way into an imaginary heaven. You are as stupid as >>>>>dookie. and just for your information what you classify as three >>>>>dimensional space/time is actually 4 dimensions. WTG smart guy. and >>>>>actually a godlike being would be a zero dimensional being. so a god >>>>>would not even know that humans existed nor the universe or anything >>>>>else in it. WTG smart guy!!! >>>>> >>>>Review this Bible passage: >>> >>>Why, moron? >>> >>>Why do you imagine any non-Christian should take it seriously. let >>>alone an atheist whom you know isn't a Christian? >>> >>>[irrelevant Bible verses rudely and stupidly posted where the psycho >>>knows his involuntary audience isn't even Christian, deleted] >>> >>>>Note that Satan >>> >>>WHAT FUCKING SATAN, imbecile? >>> >>>What part of "atheist" are you still pretending you are too stupid to >>>understand? >>> >>>> mentions only two dimensions. He is here among us in >>>>two dimensional form but we cannot perceive him, objectively. >>> >>>Either prove it or keep your mind-boggling stupidity to yourself. >>> >>>Hint: you're not stupid because you're a Christian, but because you >>>keep presuming the same old nonsense where you know your involuntary >>>audience isn't Christian, and for the crassness of your "arguments". >>> >>>Keep it to yourself, and nobody would know just how stupid you are, >>>which is better than telling us at every opportunity. >>> >>>>Label our space dimensions W, X & Y then label Satan's >>> >>>WHAT FUCKING SATAN? >>> >>>> space >>>>dimensions X, Y & Z. He can move around freely in his space but >>>>occupies only two of our spatial dimensions. >>> >>>What a fucking moron. >>> >>>>Think of a deck of cards with all the red cards less than a Planck >>>>Length >>> >>>You don't even know what Planck measurement is. >>> >>>> in thickness and all the black cards just a bit more than a >>>>Planck length in thickness. With this deck of cards arranged such the >>>>red and black cards alternate uniformly throughout the deck, would a >>>>microbe on one of the black cards be able to see any of the red cards? >>>>God >>> >>>WHAT FUCKING GOD? >>> >>>> occupies another set of spatial dimensions V, W & X and is here in >>>>our space dimensions in two dimensional form. >>> >>>Was this meant to make any sense? >>> >>>And how does talking down at us as if you had already demonstrate it, >>>discharge your burden of proof, question-begging moron? >>> >>>>But, both God and Satan >>> >>>WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN? >>> >>>> can perceive our other space dimension >>>>somewhat like we see a hologram. >>> >>>Idiot. >>> >>>> If we could work beneath the Planck >>>>Length >>> >>>Idiot. >>> >>>> we could see both God and Satan, >>> >>>WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN? >>> >>>> but we are restricted from >>>>doing so for the time being. >>> >>>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? >> >>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is >>actually making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when >>all the while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so >>funny to watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a >>maze . > >I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being >a deliberately annoying jerk. I mean the guy is such an idiot he would get lost on his hamster wheel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 21:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mnhhs9$uv6$4@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1938173 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: > <snip> > >> but we are restricted from doing so for the time being. > > Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? It must be true. He pulled it freshly out of his arse this morning. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-06 18:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mnfai00bqh@news4.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #1937616 |
Gordon wrote: > On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> > >>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>> >> >>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>> >>> >>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>> >> >>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >> > >> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >> > > You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional > space/time we occupy. So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking about Flatland.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 00:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7hqmpataukplttfs3hder2m23av25p2kno@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937813 |
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >Gordon wrote: >> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>> >> >>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>> >> >>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>> > >>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>> > >> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >> space/time we occupy. > >So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >about Flatland. he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 01:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9qqmpalb04qukdo2u238h3238t9vjo9gq0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937906 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> >wrote: > >>Gordon wrote: >>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>> >>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>> > >>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>> >> >>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>> > >>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>> > >>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>> space/time we occupy. >> >>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>about Flatland. > >he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions Or pretty much anything else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 06:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <iefnpahmpcdmi0c11lf85emvpv8dgocu4j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937906 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> >wrote: > >>Gordon wrote: >>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>> >>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>> > >>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>> >> >>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>> > >>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>> > >>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>> space/time we occupy. >> >>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>about Flatland. > >he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions > Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all coupled together into one space/time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 07:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <s2inpa9s6uip6se3a64npjb8d9o3g69k5r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938020 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 06:54:52 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> >>wrote: >> >>>Gordon wrote: >>>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>> >>>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>> > >>>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>> > >>>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>> space/time we occupy. >>> >>>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>>about Flatland. >> >>he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions >> >Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all >coupled together into one space/time. He still won't get it. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 09:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <d2pnpa1j3pelkh24hcg6vuufs2frr8fcb1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938020 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 06:54:52 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> >>wrote: >> >>>Gordon wrote: >>>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>> >>>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>> > >>>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>> > >>>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>> space/time we occupy. >>> >>>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>>about Flatland. >> >>he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions >> >Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all >coupled together into one space/time. that makes 4, dumbass
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 16:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9q5rpahn34sckhruabd6gv75pntpelp0qn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938111 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 09:38:21 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 06:54:52 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>Gordon wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>>> > >>>>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>> space/time we occupy. >>>> >>>>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>>>about Flatland. >>> >>>he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions >>> >>Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all >>coupled together into one space/time. > >that makes 4, dumbass Yeah, he clearly demonstrated he understood that. Where is your brain? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 19:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ihgrpahpa1cqhn101lfb49g8mi3ik21e7i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938858 |
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 16:34:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 09:38:21 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 06:54:52 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>Gordon wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>>>> > >>>>>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>>> space/time we occupy. >>>>> >>>>>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>>>>about Flatland. >>>> >>>>he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions >>>> >>>Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all >>>coupled together into one space/time. >> >>that makes 4, dumbass > >Yeah, he clearly demonstrated he understood that. Where is your brain? > sorry idiot after the fact doesnt count
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 11:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7junpads4q4sqdl5l0i70dodbji3mg7m9d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938020 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 06:54:52 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> >>wrote: >> >>>Gordon wrote: >>>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>> >>>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>> > >>>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>> > >>>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>> space/time we occupy. >>> >>>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>>about Flatland. >> >>he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions >> >Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all >coupled together into one space/time. So why did you say space/time was three dimensional. imbecile?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 12:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <d91opa1gr6ri5qpaogpoqs829kjskff2qt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938160 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:13:16 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 06:54:52 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>Gordon wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>>> > >>>>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>> space/time we occupy. >>>> >>>>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>>>about Flatland. >>> >>>he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions >>> >>Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all >>coupled together into one space/time. > >So why did you say space/time was three dimensional. imbecile? because until I said something he had no idea, but after I told him that he was mistaken he had to google it and figure shit out for the first time in his life. He just need to figure out what an idiot is, but looking in the mirror and knowing that the image before him is actually him may take some doing, but as soon as he gets it he will see the idiot up close
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 16:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qr5rpadq6cd7jskm70e81etcnkrt8gdu2l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938160 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:13:16 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 06:54:52 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>Gordon wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>>> > >>>>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>> space/time we occupy. >>>> >>>>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>>>about Flatland. >>> >>>he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions >>> >>Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all >>coupled together into one space/time. > >So why did you say space/time was three dimensional. imbecile? Another blind jerk. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 19:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3jgrpa95qnltcd2e7i95vnbie5v5kac3hb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938859 |
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 16:35:07 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:13:16 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 06:54:52 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>Gordon wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>>>> > >>>>>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>>> space/time we occupy. >>>>> >>>>>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>>>>about Flatland. >>>> >>>>he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions >>>> >>>Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all >>>coupled together into one space/time. >> >>So why did you say space/time was three dimensional. imbecile? > >Another blind jerk. > Clearly you cant read, must be that 1 dimensional mind you have
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 11:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4v8tpa1mpu542kv2cevgrd34vpblnfam8j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938945 |
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:38:28 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 16:35:07 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:13:16 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> >>wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 06:54:52 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Gordon wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>>>> space/time we occupy. >>>>>> >>>>>>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>>>>>about Flatland. >>>>> >>>>>he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions >>>>> >>>>Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all >>>>coupled together into one space/time. >>> >>>So why did you say space/time was three dimensional. imbecile? >> >>Another blind jerk. >> >Clearly you cant read, must be that 1 dimensional mind you have Yet I know God. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 20:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mni45g4vbs@news6.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #1938020 |
Gordon wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >> >On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi<talishi@example.net> >> >wrote: >> > >>> >>Gordon wrote: >>>> >>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>> >>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>>> >>>> > >>>> >>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>> >>> space/time we occupy. >>> >> >>> >>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>> >>about Flatland. >> > >> >he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions >> > > Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all > coupled together into one space/time. But you just said that space/time was only three dimensions total.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 16:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ls5rpalf3vejlaokaeontibmciqff94934@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938474 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 20:05:52 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >Gordon wrote: >> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:57:30 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >>> >On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:37:36 -0800, talishi<talishi@example.net> >>> >wrote: >>> > >>>> >>Gordon wrote: >>>>> >>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500,bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi<talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>Wrong - a triune Godhead<= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> >you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>> You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>> >>> space/time we occupy. >>>> >> >>>> >>So you have space/time as three dimensional, eh? You must be talking >>>> >>about Flatland. >>> > >>> >he still doesnt understand that space/time is 4 dimensions >>> > >> Space/time is three space dimensions and one temporal dimension, all >> coupled together into one space/time. > >But you just said that space/time was only three dimensions total. And that makes 3 monkeys trying to screw a football. Can we get another participant??? Anyone?? Haahaahaa. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web