Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #1930579 > unrolled thread
| Started by | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-23 17:13 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-06-26 17:37 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 378 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-23 17:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-24 00:22 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-24 14:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-24 14:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-25 13:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-24 21:48 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-25 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-25 21:35 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-26 17:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-27 19:06 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-28 17:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-29 20:05 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-29 17:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-30 08:43 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-29 17:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-30 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-04 08:30 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-04 08:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-05 08:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 08:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 06:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 10:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 10:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 08:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 11:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-05 10:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 12:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 14:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 18:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 21:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 08:45 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-07-10 06:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:45 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 21:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-06 17:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:03 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 07:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 10:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:57 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 10:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 12:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:53 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 06:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-09 10:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-07 23:55 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-09 04:46 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-09 01:41 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-09 23:10 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:13 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:40 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-07 17:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 18:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 17:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:54 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:54 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 18:35 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 17:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:21 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-05 14:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-05 20:00 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-05 18:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 20:59 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-07 17:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 11:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 11:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-05 23:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 06:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 08:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 07:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 08:42 -0400
Re: "Believers" won't go to heaven. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 06:22 -0400
Re: "Believers" won't go to heaven. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 06:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 09:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:14 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 10:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 10:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 07:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:53 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.nut> - 2015-07-10 13:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 08:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 09:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-10 14:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 17:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-06 21:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 17:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 17:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 17:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 17:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 08:51 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 16:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 11:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 20:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 10:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 21:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 21:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-06 23:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 23:35 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 18:03 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:56 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-07 20:29 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 21:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 09:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 10:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 13:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 00:37 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 12:36 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 10:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 14:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 14:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 12:54 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-08 10:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 21:02 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-08 18:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:50 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2015-07-09 17:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 16:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 00:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 19:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 13:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 08:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:01 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 07:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 09:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-10 15:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:49 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 00:09 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-08 14:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:43 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Syd M." <pauldavidwright@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-08 16:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:19 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:42 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 21:21 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-10 00:13 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 19:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-05 16:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 18:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 14:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-06 20:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 11:35 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 11:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 12:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 12:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 13:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 14:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 19:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-08 06:59 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 07:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 21:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 23:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-09 00:31 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:55 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-06 18:37 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 00:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 01:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:54 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-08 19:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:05 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:02 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 06:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 09:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 13:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 12:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 14:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 13:28 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 16:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 11:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:08 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 09:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 22:49 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-08 22:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 02:28 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-06 19:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-06 07:48 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-05 18:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-05 20:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 12:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 03:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-06 19:08 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 15:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-07-07 09:06 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-06 06:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-07-07 07:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-07 07:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-07 08:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:40 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 22:24 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-08 02:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-08 07:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-07 20:04 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:50 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-07 07:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-07 10:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 17:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 07:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-09 20:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:46 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:41 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-09 22:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.nut> - 2015-07-10 13:20 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-10 07:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-10 21:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-07-07 21:44 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-07-08 22:37 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-08 17:49 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-09 10:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 11:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-09 18:40 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 15:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-10 14:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-07 09:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-07 11:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-07-06 21:09 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-06 05:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-06 08:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 13:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-05 10:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-30 07:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-25 23:11 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-26 21:52 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-26 17:37 -0500
Page 13 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 19 Next page →
| From | Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-06 20:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7h8mpatbn6kv2uv6ptrd0vdj9ifgt84rpc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937788 |
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:24:44 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >wrote: > >>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>> >>>>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>> >>>>Wrong - a triune Godhead <= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>> >>>you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>> >>You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>space/time we occupy. But, God is not restricted thusly and our human >>minds aren't capable of all that is associated with God's space/time. > > >listen to the particle physicist, boy gordo you are trying seriously >to bullshit you way into an imaginary heaven. You are as stupid as >dookie. and just for your information what you classify as three >dimensional space/time is actually 4 dimensions. WTG smart guy. and >actually a godlike being would be a zero dimensional being. so a god >would not even know that humans existed nor the universe or anything >else in it. WTG smart guy!!! > Review this Bible passage: Job 1:7-8 (KJV) And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it. 8 And the LORD said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil? Note that Satan mentions only two dimensions. He is here among us in two dimensional form but we cannot perceive him, objectively. Label our space dimensions W, X & Y then label Satan's space dimensions X, Y & Z. He can move around freely in his space but occupies only two of our spatial dimensions. Think of a deck of cards with all the red cards less than a Planck Length in thickness and all the black cards just a bit more than a Planck length in thickness. With this deck of cards arranged such the red and black cards alternate uniformly throughout the deck, would a microbe on one of the black cards be able to see any of the red cards? God occupies another set of spatial dimensions V, W & X and is here in our space dimensions in two dimensional form. But, both God and Satan can perceive our other space dimension somewhat like we see a hologram. If we could work beneath the Planck Length we could see both God and Satan, but we are restricted from doing so for the time being.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HW@...(HG Wilson) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 11:35 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <95bmpa14fduasvlhr7kdnad4d9260qhmu9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937801 |
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >Review this Bible passage: > >Job 1:7-8 (KJV) And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? >Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the >earth, and from walking up and down in it. >8 And the LORD said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, >that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright >man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil? > >Note that Satan mentions only two dimensions. He is here among us in >two dimensional form but we cannot perceive him, objectively. > >Label our space dimensions W, X & Y then label Satan's space >dimensions X, Y & Z. He can move around freely in his space but >occupies only two of our spatial dimensions. > >Think of a deck of cards with all the red cards less than a Planck >Length in thickness and all the black cards just a bit more than a >Planck length in thickness. With this deck of cards arranged such the >red and black cards alternate uniformly throughout the deck, would a >microbe on one of the black cards be able to see any of the red cards? >God occupies another set of spatial dimensions V, W & X and is here in >our space dimensions in two dimensional form. > >But, both God and Satan can perceive our other space dimension >somewhat like we see a hologram. If we could work beneath the Planck >Length we could see both God and Satan, but we are restricted from >doing so for the time being. Have you spoken to anyone about your mental problem? I doubt if it is curable but it might be worth a checkup..
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 21:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mnhhi2$uv6$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1937812 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:35:50 +1000, HG Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: > >>Review this Bible passage: >> >>Job 1:7-8 (KJV) And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then >>Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, >>and from walking up and down in it. >>8 And the LORD said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, >>that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, >>one that feareth God, and escheweth evil? >> >>Note that Satan mentions only two dimensions. He is here among us in two >>dimensional form but we cannot perceive him, objectively. >> >>Label our space dimensions W, X & Y then label Satan's space dimensions >>X, Y & Z. He can move around freely in his space but occupies only two >>of our spatial dimensions. >> >>Think of a deck of cards with all the red cards less than a Planck >>Length in thickness and all the black cards just a bit more than a >>Planck length in thickness. With this deck of cards arranged such the >>red and black cards alternate uniformly throughout the deck, would a >>microbe on one of the black cards be able to see any of the red cards? >>God occupies another set of spatial dimensions V, W & X and is here in >>our space dimensions in two dimensional form. >> >>But, both God and Satan can perceive our other space dimension somewhat >>like we see a hologram. If we could work beneath the Planck Length we >>could see both God and Satan, but we are restricted from doing so for >>the time being. > > Have you spoken to anyone about your mental problem? I doubt if it is > curable but it might be worth a checkup.. Madam Guillotine has a cure. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 00:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <r9qmpa1tqi5pbhu9ke947uhttjlrcqvr09@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937801 |
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:24:44 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>> >>>>>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>> >>>>>Wrong - a triune Godhead <= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>> >>>>you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>> >>>You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>space/time we occupy. But, God is not restricted thusly and our human >>>minds aren't capable of all that is associated with God's space/time. >> >> >>listen to the particle physicist, boy gordo you are trying seriously >>to bullshit you way into an imaginary heaven. You are as stupid as >>dookie. and just for your information what you classify as three >>dimensional space/time is actually 4 dimensions. WTG smart guy. and >>actually a godlike being would be a zero dimensional being. so a god >>would not even know that humans existed nor the universe or anything >>else in it. WTG smart guy!!! >> >Review this Bible passage: > >Job 1:7-8 (KJV) And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? >Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the >earth, and from walking up and down in it. >8 And the LORD said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, >that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright >man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil? > >Note that Satan mentions only two dimensions. He is here among us in >two dimensional form but we cannot perceive him, objectively. > >Label our space dimensions W, X & Y then label Satan's space >dimensions X, Y & Z. He can move around freely in his space but >occupies only two of our spatial dimensions. > >Think of a deck of cards with all the red cards less than a Planck You fucking moron you have no idea what planck is >Length in thickness and all the black cards just a bit more than a >Planck length in thickness. With this deck of cards arranged such the >red and black cards alternate uniformly throughout the deck, would a >microbe on one of the black cards be able to see any of the red cards? >God occupies another set of spatial dimensions V, W & X and is here in >our space dimensions in two dimensional form. No sense, you have none and are making none.... > >But, both God and Satan can perceive our other space dimension >somewhat like we see a hologram. If we could work beneath the Planck >Length we could see both God and Satan, but we are restricted from >doing so for the time being. oh goodness me you are so retarded
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 07:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7uhnpal8jvdle3j3d7kvmkg8ajlll2691c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937904 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:56:16 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >wrote: > >>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:24:44 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>> >>>>>>Wrong - a triune Godhead <= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>> >>>>>you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>> >>>>You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>space/time we occupy. But, God is not restricted thusly and our human >>>>minds aren't capable of all that is associated with God's space/time. >>> >>> >>>listen to the particle physicist, boy gordo you are trying seriously >>>to bullshit you way into an imaginary heaven. You are as stupid as >>>dookie. and just for your information what you classify as three >>>dimensional space/time is actually 4 dimensions. WTG smart guy. and >>>actually a godlike being would be a zero dimensional being. so a god >>>would not even know that humans existed nor the universe or anything >>>else in it. WTG smart guy!!! >>> >>Review this Bible passage: >> >>Job 1:7-8 (KJV) And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? >>Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the >>earth, and from walking up and down in it. >>8 And the LORD said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, >>that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright >>man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil? >> >>Note that Satan mentions only two dimensions. He is here among us in >>two dimensional form but we cannot perceive him, objectively. >> >>Label our space dimensions W, X & Y then label Satan's space >>dimensions X, Y & Z. He can move around freely in his space but >>occupies only two of our spatial dimensions. >> >>Think of a deck of cards with all the red cards less than a Planck > > >You fucking moron you have no idea what planck is Why do you think it's something on your teeth? >>Length in thickness and all the black cards just a bit more than a >>Planck length in thickness. With this deck of cards arranged such the >>red and black cards alternate uniformly throughout the deck, would a >>microbe on one of the black cards be able to see any of the red cards? >>God occupies another set of spatial dimensions V, W & X and is here in >>our space dimensions in two dimensional form. > >No sense, you have none and are making none.... Haahaahaa. He nailed you. >>But, both God and Satan can perceive our other space dimension >>somewhat like we see a hologram. If we could work beneath the Planck >>Length we could see both God and Satan, but we are restricted from >>doing so for the time being. > > >oh goodness me you are so retarded Then how come it was you that couldn't understand what he was saying? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 11:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <d6vnpa1et30t959vkih3k1de9bclnkc816@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1937801 |
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:24:44 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>> >>>>>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>> >>>>>Wrong - a triune Godhead <= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>> >>>>you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>> >>>You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>space/time we occupy. But, God is not restricted thusly and our human >>>minds aren't capable of all that is associated with God's space/time. >> >> >>listen to the particle physicist, boy gordo you are trying seriously >>to bullshit you way into an imaginary heaven. You are as stupid as >>dookie. and just for your information what you classify as three >>dimensional space/time is actually 4 dimensions. WTG smart guy. and >>actually a godlike being would be a zero dimensional being. so a god >>would not even know that humans existed nor the universe or anything >>else in it. WTG smart guy!!! >> >Review this Bible passage: Why, moron? Why do you imagine any non-Christian should take it seriously. let alone an atheist whom you know isn't a Christian? [irrelevant Bible verses rudely and stupidly posted where the psycho knows his involuntary audience isn't even Christian, deleted] >Note that Satan WHAT FUCKING SATAN, imbecile? What part of "atheist" are you still pretending you are too stupid to understand? > mentions only two dimensions. He is here among us in >two dimensional form but we cannot perceive him, objectively. Either prove it or keep your mind-boggling stupidity to yourself. Hint: you're not stupid because you're a Christian, but because you keep presuming the same old nonsense where you know your involuntary audience isn't Christian, and for the crassness of your "arguments". Keep it to yourself, and nobody would know just how stupid you are, which is better than telling us at every opportunity. >Label our space dimensions W, X & Y then label Satan's WHAT FUCKING SATAN? > space >dimensions X, Y & Z. He can move around freely in his space but >occupies only two of our spatial dimensions. What a fucking moron. >Think of a deck of cards with all the red cards less than a Planck >Length You don't even know what Planck measurement is. > in thickness and all the black cards just a bit more than a >Planck length in thickness. With this deck of cards arranged such the >red and black cards alternate uniformly throughout the deck, would a >microbe on one of the black cards be able to see any of the red cards? >God WHAT FUCKING GOD? > occupies another set of spatial dimensions V, W & X and is here in >our space dimensions in two dimensional form. Was this meant to make any sense? And how does talking down at us as if you had already demonstrate it, discharge your burden of proof, question-begging moron? >But, both God and Satan WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN? > can perceive our other space dimension >somewhat like we see a hologram. Idiot. > If we could work beneath the Planck >Length Idiot. > we could see both God and Satan, WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN? > but we are restricted from >doing so for the time being. Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 11:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <l41opa1ho524951l8hftnmv7gag6cqbuco@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938173 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >wrote: > >>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:24:44 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>> >>>>>>Wrong - a triune Godhead <= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>> >>>>>you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>> >>>>You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>space/time we occupy. But, God is not restricted thusly and our human >>>>minds aren't capable of all that is associated with God's space/time. >>> >>> >>>listen to the particle physicist, boy gordo you are trying seriously >>>to bullshit you way into an imaginary heaven. You are as stupid as >>>dookie. and just for your information what you classify as three >>>dimensional space/time is actually 4 dimensions. WTG smart guy. and >>>actually a godlike being would be a zero dimensional being. so a god >>>would not even know that humans existed nor the universe or anything >>>else in it. WTG smart guy!!! >>> >>Review this Bible passage: > >Why, moron? > >Why do you imagine any non-Christian should take it seriously. let >alone an atheist whom you know isn't a Christian? > >[irrelevant Bible verses rudely and stupidly posted where the psycho >knows his involuntary audience isn't even Christian, deleted] > >>Note that Satan > >WHAT FUCKING SATAN, imbecile? > >What part of "atheist" are you still pretending you are too stupid to >understand? > >> mentions only two dimensions. He is here among us in >>two dimensional form but we cannot perceive him, objectively. > >Either prove it or keep your mind-boggling stupidity to yourself. > >Hint: you're not stupid because you're a Christian, but because you >keep presuming the same old nonsense where you know your involuntary >audience isn't Christian, and for the crassness of your "arguments". > >Keep it to yourself, and nobody would know just how stupid you are, >which is better than telling us at every opportunity. > >>Label our space dimensions W, X & Y then label Satan's > >WHAT FUCKING SATAN? > >> space >>dimensions X, Y & Z. He can move around freely in his space but >>occupies only two of our spatial dimensions. > >What a fucking moron. > >>Think of a deck of cards with all the red cards less than a Planck >>Length > >You don't even know what Planck measurement is. > >> in thickness and all the black cards just a bit more than a >>Planck length in thickness. With this deck of cards arranged such the >>red and black cards alternate uniformly throughout the deck, would a >>microbe on one of the black cards be able to see any of the red cards? >>God > >WHAT FUCKING GOD? > >> occupies another set of spatial dimensions V, W & X and is here in >>our space dimensions in two dimensional form. > >Was this meant to make any sense? > >And how does talking down at us as if you had already demonstrate it, >discharge your burden of proof, question-begging moron? > >>But, both God and Satan > >WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN? > >> can perceive our other space dimension >>somewhat like we see a hologram. > >Idiot. > >> If we could work beneath the Planck >>Length > >Idiot. > >> we could see both God and Satan, > >WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN? > >> but we are restricted from >>doing so for the time being. > >Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is actually making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when all the while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so funny to watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a maze .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 12:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9f1opa1efoqs0ugpma59jldhtcresc0etk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938189 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee ><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:24:44 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 18:27:19 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:20:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 06:59:16 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On 07/05/2015 06:10 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> There's only one God almighty. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>But you have no problem believing in a Triune God. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Wrong - a triune Godhead <= Father, Son, Holy Spirit. That's revealed in >>>>>>>scripture - one God in three separate but equal persons. >>>>>> >>>>>>you idiot fat fuck, how can the same thing be three seperate things? >>>>>> >>>>>You're right, it can't if it is restricted to this three dimensional >>>>>space/time we occupy. But, God is not restricted thusly and our human >>>>>minds aren't capable of all that is associated with God's space/time. >>>> >>>> >>>>listen to the particle physicist, boy gordo you are trying seriously >>>>to bullshit you way into an imaginary heaven. You are as stupid as >>>>dookie. and just for your information what you classify as three >>>>dimensional space/time is actually 4 dimensions. WTG smart guy. and >>>>actually a godlike being would be a zero dimensional being. so a god >>>>would not even know that humans existed nor the universe or anything >>>>else in it. WTG smart guy!!! >>>> >>>Review this Bible passage: >> >>Why, moron? >> >>Why do you imagine any non-Christian should take it seriously. let >>alone an atheist whom you know isn't a Christian? >> >>[irrelevant Bible verses rudely and stupidly posted where the psycho >>knows his involuntary audience isn't even Christian, deleted] >> >>>Note that Satan >> >>WHAT FUCKING SATAN, imbecile? >> >>What part of "atheist" are you still pretending you are too stupid to >>understand? >> >>> mentions only two dimensions. He is here among us in >>>two dimensional form but we cannot perceive him, objectively. >> >>Either prove it or keep your mind-boggling stupidity to yourself. >> >>Hint: you're not stupid because you're a Christian, but because you >>keep presuming the same old nonsense where you know your involuntary >>audience isn't Christian, and for the crassness of your "arguments". >> >>Keep it to yourself, and nobody would know just how stupid you are, >>which is better than telling us at every opportunity. >> >>>Label our space dimensions W, X & Y then label Satan's >> >>WHAT FUCKING SATAN? >> >>> space >>>dimensions X, Y & Z. He can move around freely in his space but >>>occupies only two of our spatial dimensions. >> >>What a fucking moron. >> >>>Think of a deck of cards with all the red cards less than a Planck >>>Length >> >>You don't even know what Planck measurement is. >> >>> in thickness and all the black cards just a bit more than a >>>Planck length in thickness. With this deck of cards arranged such the >>>red and black cards alternate uniformly throughout the deck, would a >>>microbe on one of the black cards be able to see any of the red cards? >>>God >> >>WHAT FUCKING GOD? >> >>> occupies another set of spatial dimensions V, W & X and is here in >>>our space dimensions in two dimensional form. >> >>Was this meant to make any sense? >> >>And how does talking down at us as if you had already demonstrate it, >>discharge your burden of proof, question-begging moron? >> >>>But, both God and Satan >> >>WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN? >> >>> can perceive our other space dimension >>>somewhat like we see a hologram. >> >>Idiot. >> >>> If we could work beneath the Planck >>>Length >> >>Idiot. >> >>> we could see both God and Satan, >> >>WHAT FUCKING GOD AND WHAT FUCKING SATAN? >> >>> but we are restricted from >>>doing so for the time being. >> >>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? > >It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is >actually making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when >all the while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so >funny to watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a >maze . I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being a deliberately annoying jerk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 12:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qi3opa17iv84kek2dar0jm0qen3ib2j4po@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938213 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>wrote: >>> <snip> >>> >>>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? >> >>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is >>actually making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when >>all the while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so >>funny to watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a >>maze . > >I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being >a deliberately annoying jerk. > My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an atheist. It may be that they would like to review things from both perspectives.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 13:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lc5opadp2dmusp0ai5sljjjuuec34prc6v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938215 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:40:39 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee ><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>>wrote: >>>> ><snip> >>>> >>>>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? >>> >>>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is >>>actually making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when >>>all the while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so >>>funny to watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a >>>maze . >> >>I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being >>a deliberately annoying jerk. >> >My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow >this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an >atheist. You can't stop lying about this, even though you have been told over and over again that it's not a choice. When one has no reason to believe something, then one doesn't. Why do you keep pretending you don't understand this? There are different meta-reasons for this, ie "the reason for the reason". None of which are "choosing not to believe". These include losing the belief as one grows up, in exactly the same way you lost your Santa Claus belief. Was that really a choice for you? And learning that the real world doesn't match what you had been taught to believe. Or having parents who tried to teach it but it didn't take. There are even some of us raised by atheist parents in a completely theism- and religion- free environment. > It may be that they would like to review things from both >perspectives. Don't be so fucking stupid. Either that or learn to stop lying. There are no "both perspectives" - just a theist loonie rudely and stupidly posting ignorant nonsense, transparent dishonesty, personal lies about atheists, etc, and who is so stupid he talks as if atheists were closet Christians already. Why do you talk as if _any_ atheist believed in your god? If they did, they wouldn't be atheist. You have no idea what atheist is, how one thinks or what means to one to be one. And you don't even try to learn. Even though we've told you over and over again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 14:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mnh603$cus$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1938215 |
On 7/7/2015 1:40 PM, Gordon wrote: > > My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow > this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an > atheist. Gordon, I have made the irrevocable decision NOT to believe. I look at it as a sort of reverse Pascal's wager. If I asm right and god doesn't exist, no harm will come to me. If god is real, a just god would never punish someone for using their common sense and NOT believing without evidence. So either way, I win. -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 19:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mni39i5v3n@news6.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #1938233 |
HVAC wrote: > On 7/7/2015 1:40 PM, Gordon wrote: >> >> My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow >> this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an >> atheist. > > > Gordon, I have made the irrevocable decision NOT to believe. > > I look at it as a sort of reverse Pascal's wager. If I asm right and god > doesn't exist, no harm will come to me. > > If god is real, a just god would never punish someone for using their > common sense and NOT believing without evidence. > > So either way, I win. And if God is real, and he punishes you for not believing without evidence, then he is not a just God, and not worthy of worship, in which case you just take your lumps from a monster.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 11:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <js8tpa1qbtf3lkphh7dp8e1djcgeghmvel@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938465 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:50:57 -0800, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >HVAC wrote: >> On 7/7/2015 1:40 PM, Gordon wrote: >>> >>> My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow >>> this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an >>> atheist. >> >> >> Gordon, I have made the irrevocable decision NOT to believe. >> >> I look at it as a sort of reverse Pascal's wager. If I asm right and god >> doesn't exist, no harm will come to me. >> >> If god is real, a just god would never punish someone for using their >> common sense and NOT believing without evidence. >> >> So either way, I win. > >And if God is real, and he punishes you for not believing without >evidence, He has been given evidence galore. You atheist clowns are trying to convince yourself that there is no God. You're on a dead, and I do mean dead, road. then he is not a just God, and not worthy of worship, in which >case you just take your lumps from a monster. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-09 11:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tp8tpalgje7ij3534hajugopi7rleq46gn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938233 |
On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:34:08 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >On 7/7/2015 1:40 PM, Gordon wrote: >> >> My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow >> this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an >> atheist. > > >Gordon, I have made the irrevocable decision NOT to believe. Using your bad imagination. >I look at it as a sort of reverse Pascal's wager. If I asm right and god >doesn't exist, no harm will come to me. >If god is real, a just god would never punish someone for using their >common sense and NOT believing without evidence. But he gave you all evidence to take the opposite stance. > >So either way, I win. Nope, you lose/no win. God's people win/no win. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 13:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v38opa9ea8hd0kdejte0hvlt4f91o3kjq9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938215 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:40:39 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee ><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>>wrote: >>>> ><snip> >>>> >>>>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? >>> >>>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is >>>actually making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when >>>all the while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so >>>funny to watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a >>>maze . >> >>I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being >>a deliberately annoying jerk. >> >My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow >this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an and you are as I said lost on your hamster wheel...... >atheist. It may be that they would like to review things from both >perspectives. IF that was the case then they would also be in a theist group BUT YOU HAVE NO FUCKING SENSE WHATSOEVER. You dont know how to think or act or do anything constuctive
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 06:59 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <k3fopathjvp4spu1bp9fddeilretmo1dnk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938215 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:40:39 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> wrote: >On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is >>>actually making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when >>>all the while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so >>>funny to watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a >>>maze . >> >>I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being >>a deliberately annoying jerk. >> >My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow >this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an >atheist. It may be that they would like to review things from both >perspectives. Hey idiot, every kid is BORN an atheist. Many unfortunate ones are subsequently indoctrinated by ignorant parents and pedophile priests. Atheism is the default state of all life. _____Religion is the barrier to civilization.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-07 22:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mnhk9h$5og$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1938215 |
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:40:39 -0500, Gordon wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >>>>wrote: >>>> > <snip> >>>> >>>>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? >>> >>>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is actually >>>making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when all the >>>while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so funny to >>>watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a maze . >> >>I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being a >>deliberately annoying jerk. >> > My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow > this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an > atheist. It may be that they would like to review things from both > perspectives. Please tell us, Gordon, what would make _you_ decide to believe in leprechauns? When you've answered that question, you will see exactly how useless your efforts here are. Atheists have exactly as much belief in your supposed god character as you have in leprechauns. <WARNING> Plague of crickets expected here shortly. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 02:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-14520B.02215708072015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #1938354 |
In article <mnhk9h$5og$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:40:39 -0500, Gordon wrote: > > > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > > <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > > > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >> > >>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > >>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > > <snip> > >>>> > >>>>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? > >>> > >>>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is actually > >>>making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when all the > >>>while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so funny to > >>>watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a maze . > >> > >>I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being a > >>deliberately annoying jerk. > >> > > My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow > > this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an > > atheist. <piggybacking> What the FUCK are you talking about Gordon? Nobody DECIDES to become an atheist; one either believes in a god or one doesn't, no decision necessary. It seems you still have no clue what an atheist is. -- JD Being open-minded is merely the willingness to consider evidence, not the willingness to accept claims without any.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 07:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5c5qpadg87vpopal1vglachjbli0vnd0r0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1938574 |
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 02:21:57 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >In article <mnhk9h$5og$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >wrote: > >> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:40:39 -0500, Gordon wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >> > <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> > >> >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >> >>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> >> >>>>wrote: >> >>>> >> > <snip> >> >>>> >> >>>>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? >> >>> >> >>>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is actually >> >>>making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when all the >> >>>while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so funny to >> >>>watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a maze . >> >> >> >>I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being a >> >>deliberately annoying jerk. >> >> >> > My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow >> > this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an >> > atheist. > ><piggybacking> > > >What the FUCK are you talking about Gordon? Nobody DECIDES to become an >atheist; one either believes in a god or one doesn't, no decision >necessary. > > >It seems you still have no clue what an atheist is. We've been explaining it to him for years and he either takes no notice at all, or he nastily asks if we think we speak for all atheists. Which for some reason known only to himself, he imagines he does.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-08 21:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <559DF41E.10C2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #1938574 |
Jeanne Douglas wrote: > > In article <mnhk9h$5og$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > > > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:40:39 -0500, Gordon wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:31:37 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > > > <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > > > > > >>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:57:58 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > >> > > >>>On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:33:51 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > > >>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>>On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:00:57 -0500, Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> > > >>>>wrote: > > >>>> > > > <snip> > > >>>> > > >>>>Then how do you know any of this nonsense, imbecile? > > >>> > > >>>It is funny chris when you think about it. He talks like he is actually > > >>>making headway in converting the atheists that are here, when all the > > >>>while he lies and makes shit up as he pleases.. it is just so funny to > > >>>watch.... it it like watching a retarded rat crawl through a maze . > > >> > > >>I don't think he's trying to do that - he's just another psycho being a > > >>deliberately annoying jerk. > > >> > > > My only purpose in posting here is that there may be some who follow > > > this newsgroup who haven't yet made an irreversible decision to be an > > > atheist. > > <piggybacking> > > What the FUCK are you talking about Gordon? Nobody DECIDES to become an > atheist; one either believes in a god or one doesn't, no decision > necessary. People don't just believe in God...they come to believe in God, or they lose their belief in God, like Charles Darwin did after his daughter died. Atheist appear to be....mad at God. Atheist make God appear to be Al Capone!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web