Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #1921087 > unrolled thread
| Started by | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-09 14:56 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-06-22 22:19 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 265 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.atheism
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-09 14:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-10 00:36 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-10 12:10 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 11:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-10 18:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-11 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-12 04:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-12 20:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. hhyapster@gmail.com - 2015-06-12 19:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-12 19:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-13 13:37 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 14:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-14 09:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-14 16:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-14 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-12 20:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 03:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-13 07:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-13 09:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 05:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-13 12:25 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 07:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 13:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 14:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 21:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-14 09:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 13:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 14:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 21:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 05:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 09:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-14 15:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 07:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-15 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 15:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 23:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 06:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 13:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-16 22:35 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-16 12:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 14:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-17 23:47 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-17 19:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-18 19:17 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-18 21:42 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-18 15:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-19 06:29 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-18 20:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 06:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-20 08:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:23 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-21 14:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:03 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:20 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. history <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-20 18:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-20 18:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:05 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:07 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. G hitlug <dontmailme@illmail.you> - 2015-06-22 11:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 07:33 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-20 11:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-21 17:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-06-21 17:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-20 12:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 13:21 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Joe Bruno <joebruno86@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 04:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 16:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 10:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-20 08:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 19:46 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-22 00:42 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-17 18:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-17 20:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-18 02:34 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-18 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 09:00 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 10:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-21 09:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-19 18:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 06:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 11:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 14:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-20 19:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 23:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 06:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 12:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 10:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:34 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Everest Hollyworth <everesthollyworth1989@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 01:49 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 07:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 06:22 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 08:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-19 14:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 15:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 10:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 14:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-16 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-16 14:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-16 19:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 07:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-19 20:22 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-19 06:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-19 05:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 06:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Marvin Sebourn <osugeography@aol.com> - 2015-06-19 12:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 15:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 10:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 14:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:15 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Sesiom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-06-22 13:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-22 22:19 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 18:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-22 21:51 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-14 07:49 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-14 15:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-15 22:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Marvin Sebourn <osugeography@aol.com> - 2015-06-16 11:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-13 22:40 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-13 10:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-14 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-15 07:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-10 12:16 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 11:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-10 10:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-10 23:13 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-11 11:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-11 20:45 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-13 12:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-13 22:50 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-14 15:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-15 07:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-15 08:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-15 13:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-15 16:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-16 19:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-17 18:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-06-18 19:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Robert Weldon" <roborat13@hotmail.com> - 2015-06-17 12:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-18 07:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-15 21:43 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-15 23:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-16 12:52 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 14:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 00:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 19:20 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 21:33 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-06-19 07:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:37 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 07:17 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-17 00:12 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-16 18:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 19:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-17 14:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-06-17 23:41 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-17 23:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mattb. <Trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 23:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-06-18 02:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-18 11:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-17 19:28 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-18 06:12 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-17 22:36 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-17 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-18 22:43 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:21 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-19 20:10 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 06:57 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-21 09:14 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 14:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-22 09:27 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:15 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:31 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:27 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:16 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 14:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 21:59 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 13:55 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 17:05 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-22 19:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. G hitlug <dontmailme@illmail.you> - 2015-06-22 11:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-22 21:57 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-19 20:13 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-19 06:31 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-19 13:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-20 07:03 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:33 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-06-21 09:18 +1000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 22:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 14:01 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-17 15:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-17 21:30 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:24 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-19 19:25 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 14:10 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-20 20:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-06-21 21:57 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-18 01:30 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-18 16:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 02:29 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-06-19 21:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:54 -0500
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 00:23 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 06:24 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. Jane@home.. - 2015-06-20 21:05 +1000
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 07:31 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-06-20 05:50 -0700
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 09:41 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. Jane@home.. - 2015-06-21 09:46 +1000
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 07:05 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-20 05:24 -0700
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 08:29 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 12:07 -0400
Re: The Pope is ruthless and inhumane. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-06-22 07:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-20 09:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-20 21:18 +0200
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-06-21 15:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> - 2015-06-22 22:19 +0200
Page 10 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 14 Next page →
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 16:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <59c6oal42qn5gv23rt1kcgm8beb71t9epm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1926517 |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:33:01 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:15:24 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:36:42 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>On 6/16/2015 1:52 PM, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> I seriously doubt that you can find anybody who'll claim that they >>>>> /know/ >>>>> there is no God. >>>> >>>> That's what I've been saying all along. That takes knowledge that no >>>> man possesses. >> >>>I have the knowledge. There is NO god. And I have EXACTLY the same >>>amount of evidence as you. You mad Duke? >> >> No, I know that our existence was made possible only in creation. The >> Creator's name is God. > >Merely your stupid, unevidenced belief, puke. Merely your eternal demise into the Lake of Fire. >> Would you like to try for an intelligent comment now. >You first. My position is already well known. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-19 07:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mm0tis$olt$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1927033 |
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:59c6oal42qn5gv23rt1kcgm8beb71t9epm@4ax.com... > On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:33:01 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:15:24 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:36:42 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On 6/16/2015 1:52 PM, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I seriously doubt that you can find anybody who'll claim that they >>>>>> /know/ >>>>>> there is no God. >>>>> >>>>> That's what I've been saying all along. That takes knowledge that no >>>>> man possesses. >>> >>>>I have the knowledge. There is NO god. And I have EXACTLY the same >>>>amount of evidence as you. You mad Duke? >>> >>> No, I know that our existence was made possible only in creation. The >>> Creator's name is God. >> >>Merely your stupid, unevidenced belief, puke. > > Merely your eternal demise into the Lake of Fire. Now you're back to the flames, you should really make up your mind. > >>> Would you like to try for an intelligent comment now. >>You first. > > My position is already well known. Yes, it's faith based nonsense that lacks evidence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-19 19:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mm1r11$3rq$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1927033 |
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:00:04 -0500, duke wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:33:01 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:15:24 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:36:42 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On 6/16/2015 1:52 PM, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I seriously doubt that you can find anybody who'll claim that they >>>>>> /know/ >>>>>> there is no God. >>>>> >>>>> That's what I've been saying all along. That takes knowledge that >>>>> no man possesses. >>> >>>>I have the knowledge. There is NO god. And I have EXACTLY the same >>>>amount of evidence as you. You mad Duke? >>> >>> No, I know that our existence was made possible only in creation. >>> The Creator's name is God. >> >>Merely your stupid, unevidenced belief, puke. > > Merely your eternal demise into the Lake of Fire. Merely your stupid, unevidenced belief, puke. >>> Would you like to try for an intelligent comment now. >>You first. > > My position is already well known. Your well known position on intelligent comments is that you never make them. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-20 07:17 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <oj19oapf74ahajsc9e2vtbur4vk6nj056n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1927598 |
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:37:05 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:00:04 -0500, duke wrote: >Merely your stupid, unevidenced belief, puke. > >>>> Would you like to try for an intelligent comment now. >>>You first. >> >> My position is already well known. > >Your well known position on intelligent comments is that you never make >them. I wonder if duke is aware of the fact that the average IQ of a church goer is only half the national average. __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-20 09:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5dtaoa1g2ce3nuupg2ue3md8l6584rd9d3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1927654 |
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 07:17:33 +1000, Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> wrote: >On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:37:05 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:00:04 -0500, duke wrote: > >>Merely your stupid, unevidenced belief, puke. >> >>>>> Would you like to try for an intelligent comment now. >>>>You first. >>> >>> My position is already well known. >> >>Your well known position on intelligent comments is that you never make >>them. > >I wonder if duke is aware of the fact that the average IQ of a church goer is >only half the national average. I'm waiting on you to tell me why there's no God. >Henry Wilson DSc. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-20 09:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5btaoah063dlibphu9luavrb5f46n48fee@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1927598 |
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:37:05 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:00:04 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:33:01 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:15:24 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:36:42 -0400, HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 6/16/2015 1:52 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I seriously doubt that you can find anybody who'll claim that they >>>>>>> /know/ >>>>>>> there is no God. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's what I've been saying all along. That takes knowledge that >>>>>> no man possesses. >>>> >>>>>I have the knowledge. There is NO god. And I have EXACTLY the same >>>>>amount of evidence as you. You mad Duke? >>>> >>>> No, I know that our existence was made possible only in creation. >>>> The Creator's name is God. >>> >>>Merely your stupid, unevidenced belief, puke. >> >> Merely your eternal demise into the Lake of Fire. > >Merely your stupid, unevidenced belief, puke. > >>>> Would you like to try for an intelligent comment now. >>>You first. >> >> My position is already well known. > >Your well known position on intelligent comments is that you never make >them. Yep, your miserable brain power can't reach high enough to grab one. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 00:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <55809f3b$0$23232$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #1925934 |
"duke" skrev i meddelelsen news:deo0oa9qjit0va3du8eobrouc8sb23fkko@4ax.com... > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:48:59 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> > wrote: > > >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen > >news:f5qrna1pptlcpdp0oinj114p8p2tjf6ufq@4ax.com... > > > >(snip) > > > >> When, oh when, will you losers try to support your unfounded profession > >> that > >> there is NO God. > > > >I seriously doubt that you can find anybody who'll claim that they /know/ > >there is no God. > > That's what I've been saying all along. ... So have atheists. It's only theists like you who claim, that atheists say they /know/ God doesn't exist. > ... That takes knowledge that no man > possesses. ... And so does knowing that God does exist. > ... Hence, with no evidence, the best you guys can say is that you don't > believe, like in you don't believe the evidence that is available to us > all. Without evidence not believing is the only rational thing to do. > > >Personally, I settle for a 99,99999% certainty that it is > >so. I /believe/ that God doesn't exist. > > Finally, you are an agnostic. There's no such thing as a legitimate > atheist. An atheist is somebody who doesn't believe in gods. I'm one of them, and I promise you I'm as legit as it gets. > > >Not because I have hard, physical evidence to back up my belief, but > >because > >you have nothing to back up yours. And you're the one making the positive > >claim. An outrageous one as well, so I can sit back and wait for you to > >provide the evidence and see if it is sufficient to make me change my > >mind. > >I can't make any promises, though, and as you already know, the Bible and > >'Tales of the Sacred Whispers in the Heart' have never convinced me, and > >never will. So, if that is all you've got, I'll just have to crank it up > >a > >notch to 99,999996 % certainty. > > > >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are approaching 100% > >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to still > >harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see it. > >You're > >destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. > > You too. Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good as gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. > > the dukester, American-American > > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > ***** -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-16 18:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ssc1oadbtdh0av6i5v0ls1d1uihp9rf6tg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1926020 |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:12:13 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >news:deo0oa9qjit0va3du8eobrouc8sb23fkko@4ax.com... >> >> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:48:59 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> wrote: >> >> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >> >news:f5qrna1pptlcpdp0oinj114p8p2tjf6ufq@4ax.com... >> > >> >(snip) >> > >> >> When, oh when, will you losers try to support your unfounded profession >> >> that >> >> there is NO God. >> > >> >I seriously doubt that you can find anybody who'll claim that they /know/ >> >there is no God. >> >> That's what I've been saying all along. ... > >So have atheists. It's only theists like you who claim, that atheists say >they /know/ God doesn't exist. Both of these rest on Liarboi Puke's baseless presumption which means nothing outside his religion. >> ... That takes knowledge that no man >> possesses. ... > >And so does knowing that God does exist. He doesn't know - he only believes it as part of his childhood religious brainwashing. And like the vast majority of theists, he is too stupid to understand that outside his religion, it is merely somebody else's religious belief. >> ... Hence, with no evidence, the best you guys can say is that you don't >> believe, like in you don't believe the evidence that is available to us >> all. WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE WAS THE PROVEN SERIAL LIAR LYING ABOUT? >Without evidence not believing is the only rational thing to do. > >> >> >Personally, I settle for a 99,99999% certainty that it is >> >so. I /believe/ that God doesn't exist. >> >> Finally, you are an agnostic. There's no such thing as a legitimate >> atheist. *L*I*A*R* >An atheist is somebody who doesn't believe in gods. I'm one of them, and I >promise you I'm as legit as it gets. We all are. But it's Catholic doctrine that everybody "really" believes. And Liarboi Puke is so brainwashed he believes the lies, libel and slander his church tells its followers about us. >> >Not because I have hard, physical evidence to back up my belief, but >> >because >> >you have nothing to back up yours. And you're the one making the positive >> >claim. An outrageous one as well, so I can sit back and wait for you to >> >provide the evidence and see if it is sufficient to make me change my >> >mind. >> >I can't make any promises, though, and as you already know, the Bible and >> >'Tales of the Sacred Whispers in the Heart' have never convinced me, and >> >never will. So, if that is all you've got, I'll just have to crank it up >> >a >> >notch to 99,999996 % certainty. >> > >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are approaching 100% >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to still >> >harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see it. >> >You're >> >destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. >> >> You too. Liar. >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good as >gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. >'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. The US is pretty much the only developed country which is so religious, with the possible exception of Ireland and Poland. It's not for nothing that Ratzinger used newbies Poland to try and get the EU to "acknowledge its Christian heritage" in the draft EU constitution, which ended up being abandoned because or the Vatican-directed fighting. This of course, went down like a lead balloon among both the secular countries and the (nominally) Protestant ones.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 19:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mlshmp$2m9$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #1926052 |
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:48:00 -0500, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:12:13 +0200, "Malte Runz" > <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: > >>"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>news:deo0oa9qjit0va3du8eobrouc8sb23fkko@4ax.com... >>> >>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:48:59 +0200, "Malte Runz" >>> <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >>> >news:f5qrna1pptlcpdp0oinj114p8p2tjf6ufq@4ax.com... >>> > >>> >(snip) >>> > >>> >> When, oh when, will you losers try to support your unfounded >>> >> profession that there is NO God. >>> > >>> >I seriously doubt that you can find anybody who'll claim that they >>> >/know/ >>> >there is no God. >>> >>> That's what I've been saying all along. ... >> >>So have atheists. It's only theists like you who claim, that atheists >>say they /know/ God doesn't exist. > > Both of these rest on Liarboi Puke's baseless presumption which means > nothing outside his religion. > >>> ... That takes knowledge that no man possesses. ... >> >>And so does knowing that God does exist. > > He doesn't know - he only believes it as part of his childhood religious > brainwashing. > > And like the vast majority of theists, he is too stupid to understand > that outside his religion, it is merely somebody else's religious > belief. > >>> ... Hence, with no evidence, the best you guys can say is that you >>> don't believe, like in you don't believe the evidence that is >>> available to us all. > > WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE WAS THE PROVEN SERIAL LIAR LYING ABOUT? > >>Without evidence not believing is the only rational thing to do. >> >> >>> >Personally, I settle for a 99,99999% certainty that it is so. I >>> >/believe/ that God doesn't exist. >>> >>> Finally, you are an agnostic. There's no such thing as a legitimate >>> atheist. > > *L*I*A*R* > >>An atheist is somebody who doesn't believe in gods. I'm one of them, and >>I promise you I'm as legit as it gets. > > We all are. > > But it's Catholic doctrine that everybody "really" believes. > > And Liarboi Puke is so brainwashed he believes the lies, libel and > slander his church tells its followers about us. > >>> >Not because I have hard, physical evidence to back up my belief, but >>> >because you have nothing to back up yours. And you're the one making >>> >the positive claim. An outrageous one as well, so I can sit back and >>> >wait for you to provide the evidence and see if it is sufficient to >>> >make me change my mind. >>> >I can't make any promises, though, and as you already know, the Bible >>> >and 'Tales of the Sacred Whispers in the Heart' have never convinced >>> >me, and never will. So, if that is all you've got, I'll just have to >>> >crank it up a >>> >notch to 99,999996 % certainty. >>> > >>> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are approaching >>> >100% >>> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to >>> >still harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see >>> >it. You're destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. >>> >>> You too. > > Liar. > >>Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good >>as gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. >>'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. > > The US is pretty much the only developed country which is so religious, > with the possible exception of Ireland and Poland. And Ireland is fast becoming secular. > It's not for nothing that Ratzinger used newbies Poland to try and get > the EU to "acknowledge its Christian heritage" in the draft EU > constitution, which ended up being abandoned because or the > Vatican-directed fighting. > > This of course, went down like a lead balloon among both the secular > countries and the (nominally) Protestant ones. And would have put an end to Turkey's bid to become a member. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 14:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sli3oalavcn39lf381mko9pl8be1pl9vof@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1926430 |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:27:21 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> It's not for nothing that Ratzinger used newbies Poland to try and get >> the EU to "acknowledge its Christian heritage" in the draft EU >> constitution, which ended up being abandoned because or the >> Vatican-directed fighting. >> >> This of course, went down like a lead balloon among both the secular >> countries and the (nominally) Protestant ones. > >And would have put an end to Turkey's bid to become a member. During the first Gulf War, the US wanted to use NATO bases in Turkey to attack Iraq. (The North Atlantic Treaty was for mutual defence against a soviet threat, and did not allow NATO to be used offensively, outside Europe. I don't it has been renegotiated) Bush1 promised Turkey that he would get them into the EU, in return for using these bases. Which went down like a lead balloon in Europe,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 23:41 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <cue7s4F4pteU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #1926052 |
On 17/06/2015 01:48, Christopher A. Lee wrote: >> Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good as >> gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. >> 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. > > The US is pretty much the only developed country which is so > religious, with the possible exception of Ireland and Poland. > > It's not for nothing that Ratzinger used newbies Poland to try and get > the EU to "acknowledge its Christian heritage" in the draft EU > constitution, which ended up being abandoned because or the > Vatican-directed fighting. > > This of course, went down like a lead balloon among both the secular > countries and the (nominally) Protestant ones. > I'm conflicted here. On the one hand, I would not want a political regime explicitly rooted in Christianity or any other religion. On the other hand, common cultural traits are absolutely vital for the success of a venture such as the European Union.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 23:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-51B881.23005017062015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #1926528 |
In article <cue7s4F4pteU1@mid.individual.net>, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On 17/06/2015 01:48, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > > >> Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good as > >> gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. > >> 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. > > > > The US is pretty much the only developed country which is so > > religious, with the possible exception of Ireland and Poland. > > > > It's not for nothing that Ratzinger used newbies Poland to try and get > > the EU to "acknowledge its Christian heritage" in the draft EU > > constitution, which ended up being abandoned because or the > > Vatican-directed fighting. > > > > This of course, went down like a lead balloon among both the secular > > countries and the (nominally) Protestant ones. > > > > I'm conflicted here. > > On the one hand, I would not want a political regime explicitly rooted > in Christianity or any other religion. > > On the other hand, common cultural traits are absolutely vital for the > success of a venture such as the European Union. We have a rare privilege here. We can decide which of our cultural traits are worth keeping and which are not as we move our societies into the future. And we don't have to let the religions make those choices for us ever again; we can choose what most helps humanity and humans. -- JD Being open-minded is merely the willingness to consider evidence, not the willingness to accept claims without any.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb. <Trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 23:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8nn4oalf13rvk68h8ejvvv65gi55h9kd5l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1926701 |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:00:50 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >In article <cue7s4F4pteU1@mid.individual.net>, > "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 17/06/2015 01:48, Christopher A. Lee wrote: >> >> >> Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good as >> >> gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. >> >> 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >> > >> > The US is pretty much the only developed country which is so >> > religious, with the possible exception of Ireland and Poland. >> > >> > It's not for nothing that Ratzinger used newbies Poland to try and get >> > the EU to "acknowledge its Christian heritage" in the draft EU >> > constitution, which ended up being abandoned because or the >> > Vatican-directed fighting. >> > >> > This of course, went down like a lead balloon among both the secular >> > countries and the (nominally) Protestant ones. >> > >> >> I'm conflicted here. >> >> On the one hand, I would not want a political regime explicitly rooted >> in Christianity or any other religion. >> >> On the other hand, common cultural traits are absolutely vital for the >> success of a venture such as the European Union. > > >We have a rare privilege here. We can decide which of our cultural >traits are worth keeping and which are not as we move our societies into >the future. And we don't have to let the religions make those choices >for us ever again; we can choose what most helps humanity and humans. Do you believe you have the right to remove religion? To close mosque and churches?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 02:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <l4t4oah7dqladsdpo8djt62leibc8rmtmr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1926703 |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:03:17 -0700, Mattb. <Trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:00:50 -0700, Jeanne Douglas ><hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > >>In article <cue7s4F4pteU1@mid.individual.net>, >> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> On 17/06/2015 01:48, Christopher A. Lee wrote: >>> >>> >> Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good as >>> >> gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. >>> >> 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >>> > >>> > The US is pretty much the only developed country which is so >>> > religious, with the possible exception of Ireland and Poland. >>> > >>> > It's not for nothing that Ratzinger used newbies Poland to try and get >>> > the EU to "acknowledge its Christian heritage" in the draft EU >>> > constitution, which ended up being abandoned because or the >>> > Vatican-directed fighting. >>> > >>> > This of course, went down like a lead balloon among both the secular >>> > countries and the (nominally) Protestant ones. >>> > >>> >>> I'm conflicted here. >>> >>> On the one hand, I would not want a political regime explicitly rooted >>> in Christianity or any other religion. >>> >>> On the other hand, common cultural traits are absolutely vital for the >>> success of a venture such as the European Union. >> >> >>We have a rare privilege here. We can decide which of our cultural >>traits are worth keeping and which are not as we move our societies into >>the future. And we don't have to let the religions make those choices >>for us ever again; we can choose what most helps humanity and humans. > > >Do you believe you have the right to remove religion? To close mosque >and churches? > That should be a mandate. that should be enacted NOW, just to save lives
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 16:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kcc6oalvv0rj0bgrhqq5mpnci1v3mi9kkt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1926703 |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:03:17 -0700, Mattb. <Trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:00:50 -0700, Jeanne Douglas ><hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > >>In article <cue7s4F4pteU1@mid.individual.net>, >> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> On 17/06/2015 01:48, Christopher A. Lee wrote: >>> >>> >> Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good as >>> >> gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. >>> >> 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. >>> > >>> > The US is pretty much the only developed country which is so >>> > religious, with the possible exception of Ireland and Poland. >>> > >>> > It's not for nothing that Ratzinger used newbies Poland to try and get >>> > the EU to "acknowledge its Christian heritage" in the draft EU >>> > constitution, which ended up being abandoned because or the >>> > Vatican-directed fighting. >>> > >>> > This of course, went down like a lead balloon among both the secular >>> > countries and the (nominally) Protestant ones. >>> > >>> >>> I'm conflicted here. >>> >>> On the one hand, I would not want a political regime explicitly rooted >>> in Christianity or any other religion. >>> >>> On the other hand, common cultural traits are absolutely vital for the >>> success of a venture such as the European Union. >> >> >>We have a rare privilege here. We can decide which of our cultural >>traits are worth keeping and which are not as we move our societies into >>the future. And we don't have to let the religions make those choices >>for us ever again; we can choose what most helps humanity and humans. >Do you believe you have the right to remove religion? To close mosque >and churches? It's her atheistic silliness anyway. What most helps humanity and humans is ............... God. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 11:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55830CB4.6B4D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #1926701 |
Jeanne Douglas wrote: > > In article <cue7s4F4pteU1@mid.individual.net>, > "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 17/06/2015 01:48, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > > > > >> Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good as > > >> gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. > > >> 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. > > > > > > The US is pretty much the only developed country which is so > > > religious, with the possible exception of Ireland and Poland. > > > > > > It's not for nothing that Ratzinger used newbies Poland to try and get > > > the EU to "acknowledge its Christian heritage" in the draft EU > > > constitution, which ended up being abandoned because or the > > > Vatican-directed fighting. > > > > > > This of course, went down like a lead balloon among both the secular > > > countries and the (nominally) Protestant ones. > > > > > > > I'm conflicted here. > > > > On the one hand, I would not want a political regime explicitly rooted > > in Christianity or any other religion. > > > > On the other hand, common cultural traits are absolutely vital for the > > success of a venture such as the European Union. > > We have a rare privilege here. We can decide which of our cultural > traits are worth keeping and which are not as we move our societies into > the future. And we don't have to let the religions make those choices > for us ever again; we can choose what most helps humanity and humans. > > -- > > JD Those or "we can choose" are people who are guided by some sort of ...religion or beliefs..to help humanity and humans. It's always been that way... Israel believes they are running the United States... Scientist spend billions of your money searching for a glass of water on planet X...it's a cosmic religion. Who is without religion?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 15:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hbl3oalkca68kaief3je9bvvcm26n6aaba@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1926020 |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:12:13 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >news:deo0oa9qjit0va3du8eobrouc8sb23fkko@4ax.com... >> >> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:48:59 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> wrote: >> >> >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >> >news:f5qrna1pptlcpdp0oinj114p8p2tjf6ufq@4ax.com... >> > >> >(snip) >> > >> >> When, oh when, will you losers try to support your unfounded profession >> >> that >> >> there is NO God. >> > >> >I seriously doubt that you can find anybody who'll claim that they /know/ >> >there is no God. >> That's what I've been saying all along. ... >So have atheists. It's only theists like you who claim, that atheists say >they /know/ God doesn't exist. Agnostics deny the evidence we all have that God lives amongst us. You just don't find it convincing. Atheism, otoh, denies that there is even evidence for God's presence, when we see it, and yet still you can't show how you can say "there is NO God." > >> ... That takes knowledge that no man >> possesses. ... > >And so does knowing that God does exist. > >> ... Hence, with no evidence, the best you guys can say is that you don't >> believe, like in you don't believe the evidence that is available to us >> all. > >Without evidence not believing is the only rational thing to do. > >> >> >Personally, I settle for a 99,99999% certainty that it is >> >so. I /believe/ that God doesn't exist. >> >> Finally, you are an agnostic. There's no such thing as a legitimate >> atheist. > >An atheist is somebody who doesn't believe in gods. I'm one of them, and I >promise you I'm as legit as it gets. > >> >> >Not because I have hard, physical evidence to back up my belief, but >> >because >> >you have nothing to back up yours. And you're the one making the positive >> >claim. An outrageous one as well, so I can sit back and wait for you to >> >provide the evidence and see if it is sufficient to make me change my >> >mind. >> >I can't make any promises, though, and as you already know, the Bible and >> >'Tales of the Sacred Whispers in the Heart' have never convinced me, and >> >never will. So, if that is all you've got, I'll just have to crank it up >> >a >> >notch to 99,999996 % certainty. >> > >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are approaching 100% >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to still >> >harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see it. >> >You're >> >destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. >> >> You too. > >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good as >gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. >'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. > >> >> the dukester, American-American >> >> ***** >> "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." >> Pope Paul VI >> ***** the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 19:28 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5581ae32$0$23225$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #1925934 |
"duke" skrev i meddelelsen news:deo0oa9qjit0va3du8eobrouc8sb23fkko@4ax.com... > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:48:59 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte...@forgitit.dk> > wrote: > > >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen > >news:f5qrna1pptlcpdp0oinj114p8p2tjf6ufq@4ax.com... > > > >(snip) > > > >> When, oh when, will you losers try to support your unfounded profession > >> that > >> there is NO God. > > > >I seriously doubt that you can find anybody who'll claim that they /know/ > >there is no God. > > That's what I've been saying all along. ... (It might be the second time this post appears) So have atheists. It's only theists like you who claim, that atheists say they /know/ God doesn't exist. > ... That takes knowledge that no man > possesses. ... And so does knowing that God does exist. > ... Hence, with no evidence, the best you guys can say is that you don't > believe, like in you don't believe the evidence that is available to us > all. Without evidence not believing is the only rational thing to do. > > >Personally, I settle for a 99,99999% certainty that it is > >so. I /believe/ that God doesn't exist. > > Finally, you are an agnostic. There's no such thing as a legitimate > atheist. An atheist is somebody who doesn't believe in gods. I'm one of them, and I promise you I'm as legit as it gets. > > >Not because I have hard, physical evidence to back up my belief, but > >because > >you have nothing to back up yours. And you're the one making the positive > >claim. An outrageous one as well, so I can sit back and wait for you to > >provide the evidence and see if it is sufficient to make me change my > >mind. > >I can't make any promises, though, and as you already know, the Bible and > >'Tales of the Sacred Whispers in the Heart' have never convinced me, and > >never will. So, if that is all you've got, I'll just have to crank it up > >a > >notch to 99,999996 % certainty. > > > >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are approaching 100% > >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to still > >harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see it. > >You're > >destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. > > You too. Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good as gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. 'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. > > the dukester, American-American > > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > ***** -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-18 06:12 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1926389 |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote: >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are approaching 100% >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to still >> >harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see it. >> >You're >> >destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. >> >> You too. > >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good as >gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. >'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate definition of one first. Read all about religion here: http://www.scisite.info/randf.html __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-17 22:36 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5581da2f$0$23212$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk> |
| In reply to | #1926451 |
"Henry Wilson DSc." skrev i meddelelsen news:40l3oat94vpdtkauqogvo936443nqc1dmi@4ax.com... > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:28:21 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> > wrote: > > >"duke" skrev i meddelelsen > > >> >This is how it'll play itself out. We, as a species, are approaching > >> >100% > >> >certainty asymptotically, and at some point it becomes absurd to still > >> >harbour beliefs in gods. But don't worry, you won't live to see it. > >> >You're > >> >destined to remain deluded for the rest of your life. > >> > >> You too. > > > >Have you ever been abroad? To my neck of the woods? Religion is as good > >as > >gone in all aspects of society. I'm already living the virtual 100%. > >'Whispering spirits' won't impress any of us. > > I can easily prove there are no gods. All I want is an accurate definition > of > one first. You won't get it from our local crop of theists. I've often asked for it, when they demand evidence that there is no god. How can I falsify something that isn't even defined. > Read all about religion here: http://www.scisite.info/randf.html That's a lot of words. Could you cherry pick a few goodies for us? -- Malte Runz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.atheism
csiph-web