Groups > alt.atheism > #1974591

Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science.

Newsgroups	alt.atheism, alt.astronomy, alt.usenet.kooks
Subject	Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science.
References	(6 earlier) <0a78ua1ui18epsrcu26latp5p38agobukb@4ax.com> <rpg8uapoa7858e5794mf4h4if1170c7rkp@4ax.com> <5siauati7iqj3ri2fcbg8l2mflttt6glo5@4ax.com> <charlie-gordon1492-0C6473.00114401092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> <brsbua985ognfq5vncp69pqdacdtkb7rbt@4ax.com>
Date	2015-09-01 15:16 -0400
From	"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Organization	AUKTard Polizia
Message-ID	<op.x4as5zcftm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 14:56:57 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:

> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:11:44 -0700, je suis charly
> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id
> <charlie-gordon1492-0C6473.00114401092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>
> wrote:
>
>> In article <5siauati7iqj3ri2fcbg8l2mflttt6glo5@4ax.com>,
>> Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>
>>> >That's between you and God.  I'm not your problem, you are.
>>>
>>> Between me and what no one has yet proven to exist.  Big deal.
>>
>> Yes and that is a stupid thing to say.
>
> Not really.
>
>> Assuming an objective reality, things
>> either exist or they do not exist. Proof is irrelevant. Like UFOs or  
>> other
>> universes or anything else you want to quarrel over, either they are or  
>> they are
>> not and they do not need your proof to decide their existence.
>
> True, but there is usually some evidence to support the existence of
> something that impacts a person.  In the absence of such evidence
> there are two possibilities - either the subject in question exists or
> it does not.  The intelligent position to take is that it does not
> exist and thus does not need to be taken into account in an ordinary
> life.
>
> To take the position that in the absence of evidence everything must
> exist would  force a person to take into account literally everything
> any imagination could dream up.  That would result in chaos.
>

yep, everything exists until we can disprove it.  that's how the world  
works, derrrrrrrrrrrp.

>>
>> What you are left with when you cannot prove or disprove is something  
>> you have
>> to guess at or something that has no consequence on your life and you  
>> can ignore.
>
> --
> Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
>
> Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially
> those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass.
>
> Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government
> guaranteed above average income for every person.
>
> Every illegal alien is a criminal.
> No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason.
> Deportation upon identification as the only option.
>
> If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly
> before you run into me.

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

--

Thread

Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:38 -0400
  Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 10:34 -0500
    Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:43 -0400
      Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 07:01 -0500
        Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-27 16:30 -0400
          Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 15:14 -0500
            Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 04:58 -0400
              Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 07:39 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Tim" <me@rsabc.com> - 2015-08-29 08:46 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:45 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 09:39 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 10:50 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 22:12 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 09:42 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-31 05:27 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 07:08 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 10:19 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-01 02:55 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 00:11 -0700
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-01 14:56 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-01 15:16 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 14:06 -0700
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-01 17:15 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-09-02 05:42 -0700
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-02 12:02 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 14:05 -0700
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-01 22:22 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-02 06:04 -0700
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-03 04:42 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-03 02:48 -0700
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-04 03:31 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-04 02:36 -0700
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-05 02:51 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 10:37 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 10:36 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-03 04:45 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-09-03 12:52 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-04 03:33 -0400
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 10:35 -0500
                Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-03 04:47 -0400

csiph-web