Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.atheism > #2130520

Re: FAITH

Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:43:04 -0500
Message-ID <576B8531.9FB@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Wed, 22 Jun 2016 23:44:01 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups alt.atheism, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written
Subject Re: FAITH
References <5763A7C6.1F1C@ix.netcom.com> <5767FA52.2C4@ix.netcom.com> <MPG.31d34d15b178070198c1ab@news.east.earthlink.net> <5769BB14.49A3@ix.netcom.com> <9ec77750-cf70-4048-95a8-0388e22cda6c@googlegroups.com> <576A475F.F33@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Lines 17
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 108.219.229.47
X-Trace sv3-4S89bOPzwnRbGF2F6gN1UMIHVeCrBVWanWawyFjt4P+0q6r6nvBnleZDUX+rcUE6ZXDNxqHPZnPFLgX!1sh9OyTYkJiqsZzHW1opzye2yejREeebr33JfF/0RqB7eGQRGcdmF/ICmH8VeUhn29a4I0fqmiE8!/rzrC4DdHw==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 1793
Xref csiph.com alt.atheism:2130520 sci.physics:586282 sci.physics.relativity:386550 rec.arts.sf.written:442924

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote:
> >
> > W dniu środa, 22 czerwca 2016 00:08:30 UTC+2 użytkownik The Starmaker napisał:
> >
> > >  The burden of proof is always on the person making an assertion or
> > > proposition.
> >
> > Really? So, prove the above.
> 
> The person making a negative claim cannot logically prove nonexistence.
> To know that a X does not exist would require a perfect knowledge of all things.


For example, to know that God does not exist would require a perfect
knowledge of all things.

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-22 23:44 -0700
  Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-23 11:24 -0600
    Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-23 22:54 -0700
      Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-24 09:07 -0600
        Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-24 11:14 -0700
          Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-24 12:51 -0600
            Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-24 13:38 -0700
              Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-24 16:45 -0600
                Re: FAITH The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-24 16:44 -0700
                Re: FAITH Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-06-24 18:03 -0600
              Re: FAITH hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-06-25 05:30 -0700
  Re: FAITH Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 18:34 -0700

csiph-web