Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #275841 > unrolled thread

THE 9/11 HOAX - Fourteen Years on

Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy

Contents

  THE 9/11 HOAX - Fourteen Years on "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 19:07 -0500
    Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:39 +0000
      Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 20:17 -0500
      Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-15 13:03 -0400
        Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-15 17:27 +0000
        Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 13:05 -0500
        Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 14:38 -0400
          Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-15 14:55 -0400
            Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 15:42 -0400
              Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-15 15:59 -0400
              Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-15 16:02 -0400
                Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 16:15 -0400
                Re: Bast is also crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-15 20:21 +0000
                  Re: Bast is also crazy Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 16:41 -0400
                    Re: Bast is also crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-15 21:57 +0000
                      Re: Bast is also crazy Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 19:30 -0400
                        Re: Bast is also crazy "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-15 19:47 -0400
                          Re: Bast is also crazy Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 19:55 -0400
                            Re: Bast is also crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 00:25 +0000
                              Re: Bast is also crazy Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 21:32 -0400
                                Re: Bast is also crazy Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 12:01 +1000
                                  9/11 was an inside job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-15 22:18 -0400
                                    Re: 9/11 was an inside job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 21:55 -0500
                                      Re: 9/11 was an inside job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-16 06:02 -0400
                                        Re: 9/11 was an inside job BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-16 07:56 -0400
                                          Re: 9/11 was an inside job "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-16 12:20 -0400
                                            Re: 9/11 was an inside job BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-16 18:37 -0400
                                            Re: 9/11 was an inside job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:00 -0500
                                        Re: 9/11 was an inside job "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:00 -0500
                                    Re: 9/11 was an inside job Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 22:58 -0400
                              Re: Bast is also crazy "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:01 -0500
                            Re: Bast is also crazy BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-15 20:52 -0400
                              Re: Bast is also crazy Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 23:00 -0400
                                Re: Bast is also crazy BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-15 23:39 -0400
                              Re: Bast is also crazy "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:02 -0500
                                Re: Bast is also crazy BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-15 23:40 -0400
                            Re: Bast is also crazy "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-15 21:21 -0400
                          Re: Bast is also crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 00:22 +0000
                          Re: Bast is also crazy Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-15 20:42 -0700
                Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:00 -0500
            Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-15 20:08 +0000
            Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:00 -0500
    Re: THE 9/11 HOAX - Fourteen Years on burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-14 03:37 -0400
      Re: Rocky's firing jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 16:06 +0000
    Re: THE 9/11 HOAX - Fourteen Years on Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-15 15:29 -0700
      Re: THE 9/11 HOAX - Fourteen Years on Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 10:00 -0700

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#275841 — THE 9/11 HOAX - Fourteen Years on

I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the problem 
is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen evidence myself 
of helicopters that recorded video what were not recorded by other 
helicopters so why were we given a fake background?

THE 9/11 HOAX - Fourteen Years On
 http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1410&start=90#p2396560 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#275845 — Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the problem 
> is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen evidence myself 
> of helicopters that recorded video what were not recorded by other 
> helicopters so why were we given a fake background?

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalzed is a sign of mental
illness, kook.

Whatever are you babbling about with your helicopter video ravings, kook?

Why can't you tell us the missile type and platform that your delusions
tell you hit the Pentagon, kook?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#275851 — Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave

On 9/13/2015 7:39 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the problem
>> is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen evidence myself
>> of helicopters that recorded video what were not recorded by other
>> helicopters so why were we given a fake background?
>
> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalzed is a sign of mental
> illness, kook.
>
> Whatever are you babbling about with your helicopter video ravings, kook?
>
> Why can't you tell us the missile type and platform that your delusions
> tell you hit the Pentagon, kook?
>
>

Rocky always seems to end his posts with a vague kook question, instead 
of presenting kook evicence kook.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276010 — Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the
>> problem is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen
>> evidence myself of helicopters that recorded video what were not
>> recorded by other helicopters so why were we given a fake background?
>
> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalzed is a sign of mental
> illness, kook.
>
> Whatever are you babbling about with your helicopter video ravings,
> kook?
>
> Why can't you tell us the missile type and platform that your delusions
> tell you hit the Pentagon, kook?





The questions you pose are irrelevant.
As we know you  can't justify how a passenger jet that is over 100' wide and 
40' high  can elude any photographs, and fit through a 16' hole.

....Unless it was one of those "ghost planes" old prospectors talk about 
'round the campfire on moonlit nights.

RARE Footage Pentagon 9 11 Surveillance Camera Video Impact Crash 9-11 / 
LIVE LEAK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276012 — Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave

In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> 
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>> I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the
>>> problem is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen
>>> evidence myself of helicopters that recorded video what were not
>>> recorded by other helicopters so why were we given a fake background?
>>
>> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalzed is a sign of mental
>> illness, kook.
>>
>> Whatever are you babbling about with your helicopter video ravings,
>> kook?
>>
>> Why can't you tell us the missile type and platform that your delusions
>> tell you hit the Pentagon, kook?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The questions you pose are irrelevant.
> As we know you  can't justify how a passenger jet that is over 100' wide and 
> 40' high  can elude any photographs, and fit through a 16' hole.

Who is claiming that a jet "can elude any photographs"?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276013 — Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:03:04 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

>
>
>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>> I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the
>>> problem is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen
>>> evidence myself of helicopters that recorded video what were not
>>> recorded by other helicopters so why were we given a fake background?
>>
>> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalzed is a sign of mental
>> illness, kook.
>>
>> Whatever are you babbling about with your helicopter video ravings,
>> kook?
>>
>> Why can't you tell us the missile type and platform that your delusions
>> tell you hit the Pentagon, kook?
>
>The questions you pose are irrelevant.

     That you, or Roger, are unable to answer without destroying your
k00k rant doesn't make them irrelevant. 

>As we know you  can't justify how a passenger jet that is over 100' wide and 
>40' high  can elude any photographs, and fit through a 16' hole.
>

     Who, in reality please, has claimed such a plane can elude any
photographs?
      I know you'll want to play an avoidance game, but please, just
answer the question I've asked.

>....Unless it was one of those "ghost planes" old prospectors talk about 
>'round the campfire on moonlit nights.
>

     Outside of your delusions, there is no such thing.

>RARE Footage Pentagon 9 11 Surveillance Camera Video Impact Crash 9-11 / 
>LIVE LEAK
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk 
>

     But above you claim it eluded any photographs.
     That aside, the Pentagon is not the most guarded building on
earth. Fort Knox is more heavily guarded, and was on 9/11. So from the
start you know you're being lied to in the video.
     Next it LIES and states there are more CCTV cameras covering the
Pentagon than any other building on earth. I suppose if we ignore
Buckingham Palace we can get a bit closer to that claim.
     Yes, there are other buildings that have more CCTV cameras, but
one example is all I need.
     Before the video hits the 10 second mark, the viewer has been
lied to twice. There is no reason to accept any other claims made in
it as any less deceitful.
     So, Bast, why do you link to a video that you KNOW is offering
nothing but lies? This is a serious question. Not that you'll offer a
serious answer. You can't.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276016 — Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:03:04 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

>
>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>> I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the
>>> problem is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen
>>> evidence myself of helicopters that recorded video what were not
>>> recorded by other helicopters so why were we given a fake background?
>>
>> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalzed is a sign of mental
>> illness, kook.
>>
>> Whatever are you babbling about with your helicopter video ravings,
>> kook?
>>
>> Why can't you tell us the missile type and platform that your delusions
>> tell you hit the Pentagon, kook?
>
>
>
>
>
>The questions you pose are irrelevant.

No there not when your claim is a missile struck the Pentagon.  

>As we know you  can't justify how a passenger jet that is over 100' wide and 
>40' high  can elude any photographs, and fit through a 16' hole.

Your 16 ' hole  defense means you think only a missile could fit in
that space?  

What kind of missile and platform?  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276023 — Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:03:04 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>> I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the
>>>> problem is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen
>>>> evidence myself of helicopters that recorded video what were not
>>>> recorded by other helicopters so why were we given a fake background?
>>>
>>> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalzed is a sign of mental
>>> illness, kook.
>>>
>>> Whatever are you babbling about with your helicopter video ravings,
>>> kook?
>>>
>>> Why can't you tell us the missile type and platform that your
>>> delusions tell you hit the Pentagon, kook?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The questions you pose are irrelevant.
>
> No there not when your claim is a missile struck the Pentagon.
>
>> As we know you  can't justify how a passenger jet that is over 100'
>> wide and 40' high  can elude any photographs, and fit through a 16'
>> hole.
>
> Your 16 ' hole  defense means you think only a missile could fit in
> that space?
>
> What kind of missile and platform?






That all three of your puppet ID's pulled out the same link that I posted is 
laughable.
Are you THAT afraid of  my proof ???


I'll add it back in  below, and you can now explain to everyone why you 
would feel you have to edit out my post.

=================
The questions you pose are irrelevant.
As we know you  can't justify how a passenger jet that is over 100' wide and
40' high  can elude any photographs, and fit through a 16' hole.

....Unless it was one of those "ghost planes" old prospectors talk about
'round the campfire on moonlit nights.

RARE Footage Pentagon 9 11 Surveillance Camera Video Impact Crash 9-11 /
LIVE LEAK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276026 — Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:55:35 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

>
>
>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:03:04 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>> I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the
>>>>> problem is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen
>>>>> evidence myself of helicopters that recorded video what were not
>>>>> recorded by other helicopters so why were we given a fake background?
>>>>
>>>> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalzed is a sign of mental
>>>> illness, kook.
>>>>
>>>> Whatever are you babbling about with your helicopter video ravings,
>>>> kook?
>>>>
>>>> Why can't you tell us the missile type and platform that your
>>>> delusions tell you hit the Pentagon, kook?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The questions you pose are irrelevant.
>>
>> No there not when your claim is a missile struck the Pentagon.
>>
>>> As we know you  can't justify how a passenger jet that is over 100'
>>> wide and 40' high  can elude any photographs, and fit through a 16'
>>> hole.
>>
>> Your 16 ' hole  defense means you think only a missile could fit in
>> that space?
>>
>> What kind of missile and platform?
>

>That all three of your puppet ID's pulled out the same link that I posted is 
>laughable.  Are you THAT afraid of  my proof ???

The question you keep avoiding is missile type and platform?   

What is your answer?  


>I'll add it back in  below, and you can now explain to everyone why you 
>would feel you have to edit out my post.

Your link doesn't address missile type and platform.  I've watched it.

Why don't YOU look at it again and tell me what is the missile type
and platform?  

>RARE Footage Pentagon 9 11 Surveillance Camera Video Impact Crash 9-11 /
>LIVE LEAK
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk

Did you look at it again?  Now you answer the question; 

Missile type and platform?  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276027 — Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:55:35 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:03:04 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>> I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the
>>>>>> problem is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen
>>>>>> evidence myself of helicopters that recorded video what were not
>>>>>> recorded by other helicopters so why were we given a fake
>>>>>> background?
>>>>>
>>>>> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalzed is a sign of mental
>>>>> illness, kook.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever are you babbling about with your helicopter video ravings,
>>>>> kook?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why can't you tell us the missile type and platform that your
>>>>> delusions tell you hit the Pentagon, kook?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The questions you pose are irrelevant.
>>>
>>> No there not when your claim is a missile struck the Pentagon.
>>>
>>>> As we know you  can't justify how a passenger jet that is over 100'
>>>> wide and 40' high  can elude any photographs, and fit through a 16'
>>>> hole.
>>>
>>> Your 16 ' hole  defense means you think only a missile could fit in
>>> that space?
>>>
>>> What kind of missile and platform?
>>
>
>> That all three of your puppet ID's pulled out the same link that I
>> posted is laughable.  Are you THAT afraid of  my proof ???
>
> The question you keep avoiding is missile type and platform?
>
> What is your answer?
>
>
>> I'll add it back in  below, and you can now explain to everyone why you
>> would feel you have to edit out my post.
>
> Your link doesn't address missile type and platform.  I've watched it.
>
> Why don't YOU look at it again and tell me what is the missile type
> and platform?
>
>> RARE Footage Pentagon 9 11 Surveillance Camera Video Impact Crash 9-11
>> / LIVE LEAK
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk
>
> Did you look at it again?  Now you answer the question;
>
> Missile type and platform? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276028 — Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:55:35 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:03:04 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>> I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the
>>>>>> problem is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen
>>>>>> evidence myself of helicopters that recorded video what were not
>>>>>> recorded by other helicopters so why were we given a fake
>>>>>> background?
>>>>>
>>>>> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalzed is a sign of mental
>>>>> illness, kook.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever are you babbling about with your helicopter video ravings,
>>>>> kook?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why can't you tell us the missile type and platform that your
>>>>> delusions tell you hit the Pentagon, kook?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The questions you pose are irrelevant.
>>>
>>> No there not when your claim is a missile struck the Pentagon.
>>>
>>>> As we know you  can't justify how a passenger jet that is over 100'
>>>> wide and 40' high  can elude any photographs, and fit through a 16'
>>>> hole.
>>>
>>> Your 16 ' hole  defense means you think only a missile could fit in
>>> that space?
>>>
>>> What kind of missile and platform?
>>
>
>> That all three of your puppet ID's pulled out the same link that I
>> posted is laughable.  Are you THAT afraid of  my proof ???
>
> The question you keep avoiding is missile type and platform?
>
> What is your answer?
>
>
>> I'll add it back in  below, and you can now explain to everyone why you
>> would feel you have to edit out my post.
>
> Your link doesn't address missile type and platform.  I've watched it.
>
> Why don't YOU look at it again and tell me what is the missile type
> and platform?
>
>> RARE Footage Pentagon 9 11 Surveillance Camera Video Impact Crash 9-11
>> / LIVE LEAK
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk
>
> Did you look at it again?  Now you answer the question;
>
> Missile type and platform?







Who are you to demand anything of me ? My Mother ?

Watch the video or shut up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276030 — Re: Rocky's lateset delusional rave

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:02:32 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

>
>
>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:55:35 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:03:04 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> I've seen videos of people trying to debunk September Clues but the
>>>>>>> problem is they can't debunk everything and oddly enough I've seen
>>>>>>> evidence myself of helicopters that recorded video what were not
>>>>>>> recorded by other helicopters so why were we given a fake
>>>>>>> background?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalzed is a sign of mental
>>>>>> illness, kook.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever are you babbling about with your helicopter video ravings,
>>>>>> kook?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why can't you tell us the missile type and platform that your
>>>>>> delusions tell you hit the Pentagon, kook?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The questions you pose are irrelevant.
>>>>
>>>> No there not when your claim is a missile struck the Pentagon.
>>>>
>>>>> As we know you  can't justify how a passenger jet that is over 100'
>>>>> wide and 40' high  can elude any photographs, and fit through a 16'
>>>>> hole.
>>>>
>>>> Your 16 ' hole  defense means you think only a missile could fit in
>>>> that space?
>>>>
>>>> What kind of missile and platform?
>>>
>>
>>> That all three of your puppet ID's pulled out the same link that I
>>> posted is laughable.  Are you THAT afraid of  my proof ???
>>
>> The question you keep avoiding is missile type and platform?
>>
>> What is your answer?
>>
>>
>>> I'll add it back in  below, and you can now explain to everyone why you
>>> would feel you have to edit out my post.
>>
>> Your link doesn't address missile type and platform.  I've watched it.
>>
>> Why don't YOU look at it again and tell me what is the missile type
>> and platform?
>>
>>> RARE Footage Pentagon 9 11 Surveillance Camera Video Impact Crash 9-11
>>> / LIVE LEAK
>>>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk
>>
>> Did you look at it again?  Now you answer the question;
>>
>> Missile type and platform?
>
>
>Who are you to demand anything of me ? My Mother ?


You make a claim that a missile struck the Pentagon on 9/11.

Repeatedly I've asked you to provide the missile type and platform.

You respond by posting a link to a video which doesn't address the
missile type or platform question.  

Several people here are also asking the same question of you and
Roger,  " missile type and platform?" .   

Such a simple answer, so why is it neither you NOR Roger can give us
an answer?   

>Watch the video or shut up
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk

And here we are again with you using an invalid video to make your
case.  

You have no case for a missile striking the Pentagon on 9/11. Single
handedly you've debunked your own missile conspiracy claims.  

QED.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276032 — Re: Bast is also crazy

In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
 
> Who are you to demand anything of me ? My Mother ?

Nope, just yet another person who thinks you're just as bat shit
crazy as Rocky.

> Watch the video or shut up
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk

A video that starts off with obvious lies is hardly proof of anything.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276037 — Re: Bast is also crazy

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:21:16 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Who are you to demand anything of me ? My Mother ?
>
>Nope, just yet another person who thinks you're just as bat shit
>crazy as Rocky.
>
>> Watch the video or shut up
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk
>
>A video that starts off with obvious lies is hardly proof of anything.

Jim, 

Did I read where you said you were a pilot?  If so, it's good to have
your expertise in these discussions.  

Cheers,  
Sarah Ehrett

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276046 — Re: Bast is also crazy

In sci.physics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:21:16 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>>In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Who are you to demand anything of me ? My Mother ?
>>
>>Nope, just yet another person who thinks you're just as bat shit
>>crazy as Rocky.
>>
>>> Watch the video or shut up
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk
>>
>>A video that starts off with obvious lies is hardly proof of anything.
> 
> Jim, 
> 
> Did I read where you said you were a pilot?  If so, it's good to have
> your expertise in these discussions.  
> 
> Cheers,  
> Sarah Ehrett

Yeah, I don't usually tell people that but a response along the lines
of "ask a pilot how ground effect makes an airplane uncontrolable"
was just so stupid I couldn't help myself.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276054 — Re: Bast is also crazy

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:57:30 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:21:16 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>>>In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Who are you to demand anything of me ? My Mother ?
>>>
>>>Nope, just yet another person who thinks you're just as bat shit
>>>crazy as Rocky.
>>>
>>>> Watch the video or shut up
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk
>>>
>>>A video that starts off with obvious lies is hardly proof of anything.
>> 
>> Jim, 
>> 
>> Did I read where you said you were a pilot?  If so, it's good to have
>> your expertise in these discussions.  
>> 
>> Cheers,  
>> Sarah Ehrett
>
>Yeah, I don't usually tell people that but a response along the lines
>of "ask a pilot how ground effect makes an airplane uncontrolable"
>was just so stupid I couldn't help myself.

Well then we'll just keep that info between us.   :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276056 — Re: Bast is also crazy

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:57:30 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:21:16 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Who are you to demand anything of me ? My Mother ?
>>>>
>>>> Nope, just yet another person who thinks you're just as bat shit
>>>> crazy as Rocky.
>>>>
>>>>> Watch the video or shut up
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk
>>>>
>>>> A video that starts off with obvious lies is hardly proof of
>>>> anything.
>>>
>>> Jim,
>>>
>>> Did I read where you said you were a pilot?  If so, it's good to have
>>> your expertise in these discussions.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Sarah Ehrett
>>
>> Yeah, I don't usually tell people that but a response along the lines
>> of "ask a pilot how ground effect makes an airplane uncontrolable"
>> was just so stupid I couldn't help myself.
>
> Well then we'll just keep that info between us.   :)







I'm not sure which of your schizophrenic personalities is funnier.
The one that makes paper planes and claims to be a pilot,.....or the one 
who's impressed by it.
<ROTFLMOFAO>


Hey, just or fun why don't you go to
Pilots for 9/11 Truth,
and tell them what kooks they are.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276057 — Re: Bast is also crazy

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:47:58 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

>
>
>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:57:30 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:21:16 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Who are you to demand anything of me ? My Mother ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, just yet another person who thinks you're just as bat shit
>>>>> crazy as Rocky.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Watch the video or shut up
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk
>>>>>
>>>>> A video that starts off with obvious lies is hardly proof of
>>>>> anything.
>>>>
>>>> Jim,
>>>>
>>>> Did I read where you said you were a pilot?  If so, it's good to have
>>>> your expertise in these discussions.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Sarah Ehrett
>>>
>>> Yeah, I don't usually tell people that but a response along the lines
>>> of "ask a pilot how ground effect makes an airplane uncontrolable"
>>> was just so stupid I couldn't help myself.
>>
>> Well then we'll just keep that info between us.   :)
>
>I'm not sure 

Missile type and platform?    

Still waiting for your answer. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276063 — Re: Bast is also crazy

In sci.physics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:47:58 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:57:30 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:21:16 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who are you to demand anything of me ? My Mother ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope, just yet another person who thinks you're just as bat shit
>>>>>> crazy as Rocky.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Watch the video or shut up
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A video that starts off with obvious lies is hardly proof of
>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> Did I read where you said you were a pilot?  If so, it's good to have
>>>>> your expertise in these discussions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Sarah Ehrett
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I don't usually tell people that but a response along the lines
>>>> of "ask a pilot how ground effect makes an airplane uncontrolable"
>>>> was just so stupid I couldn't help myself.
>>>
>>> Well then we'll just keep that info between us.   :)
>>
>>I'm not sure 
> 
> Missile type and platform?    
> 
> Still waiting for your answer. 

You will never get such an answer from any 9/11 lunatic, at least not
one that makes the slightes sense.

You can't argue with the insane logic that says if there is no pictue
of the airplane, than it MUST have been a missile. 
 
Of course there is no picture of a missile either, but like I said, the
logic is insane.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#276072 — Re: Bast is also crazy

On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:25:15 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:47:58 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:57:30 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:21:16 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who are you to demand anything of me ? My Mother ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, just yet another person who thinks you're just as bat shit
>>>>>>> crazy as Rocky.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Watch the video or shut up
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A video that starts off with obvious lies is hardly proof of
>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did I read where you said you were a pilot?  If so, it's good to have
>>>>>> your expertise in these discussions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Sarah Ehrett
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I don't usually tell people that but a response along the lines
>>>>> of "ask a pilot how ground effect makes an airplane uncontrolable"
>>>>> was just so stupid I couldn't help myself.
>>>>
>>>> Well then we'll just keep that info between us.   :)
>>>
>>>I'm not sure 
>> 
>> Missile type and platform?    
>> 
>> Still waiting for your answer. 
>
>You will never get such an answer from any 9/11 lunatic, at least not
>one that makes the slightes sense.
>
>You can't argue with the insane logic that says if there is no pictue
>of the airplane, than it MUST have been a missile. 
> 
>Of course there is no picture of a missile either, but like I said, the
>logic is insane.

I enjoy spinning up the 9/11 lunatics.  They can't answer the question
of  'what missile and what platform'  because there never was a
missile.  Hammering them repeatedly with the question frustrates them
and at the same time  exposes their kook logic.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy

csiph-web