Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #276159 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-16 20:09 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-09-17 23:54 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 152 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-16 20:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 19:32 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 11:28 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 14:02 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-09-17 17:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 16:42 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 10:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 11:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 09:47 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 16:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 12:11 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 09:04 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 12:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 10:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 09:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 07:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 15:57 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 14:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 19:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 16:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 20:38 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:38 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 13:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-17 19:45 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 15:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 19:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 16:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 20:35 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 09:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 17:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 22:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 16:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 21:48 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 09:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 20:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 14:53 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:29 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 13:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 17:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 07:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:31 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 13:59 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:07 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 07:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 07:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:19 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:38 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 12:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 12:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 23:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 05:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 12:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 17:07 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 18:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:50 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:14 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 20:33 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 21:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 21:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 03:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in more lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 08:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 15:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 10:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-22 17:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 23:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 07:56 +0200
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 01:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-19 20:32 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:31 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 18:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 13:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 13:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 17:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 22:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 06:39 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 14:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 01:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 14:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 22:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 13:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 12:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 14:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 18:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 21:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 22:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 23:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 02:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( the Ediot forgets a link I gave him earlier ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 12:31 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 13:07 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 14:54 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 23:54 -0700
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 22:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oofucc-bja.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #276311 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>>>>>> On 17/09/2015 16:03, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , >>>>>>>>> The Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, >>>>>>>>> Michael, Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E >>>>>>>>> Coyote or the Roadrunner because those two are the only two with >>>>>>>>> the credentials that they believe as proven by they still think >>>>>>>>> the CGIs were real. <G> >>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of >>>>>>>>> videos only dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. >>>>>>>>> See: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >>>>>>>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wow, I'm a heckler, is that a new name for someone who asks >>>>>>>> question that you can't answer? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As to the video, do we know who filmed the first sequence of the >>>>>>>> plane hitting the tower? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were >>>>>>>> they all mistaken? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Absolutely not. >>>>>>> I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their >>>>>>> eye, and then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings >>>>>>> disolving into dust. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>>>>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the >>>>>>> towers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, >>>>>>> and it fell just the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other >>>>> hitting WTC 7 >>>> >>>> You didn't hear about the collapse of the North Tower dropping heavy >>>> debris and starting fires, kook? >>>> >>>> That sort of figures as you are in your own little kook world. >>> >>> >>> Nope, but not only did I not see it. >>> No one with a camera that day did either >> >> Why do you lie about this, kook? >> >> <snip remaining kook babble> > > > I didn't lie. Yes, you quite obviously did, kook. > The 9/11 commission did, because they never dared to say or write that WTC > 7 was brought down becuase it was hit by dust. Why would the 9/11 Commission say such an insane, delusional thing, kook? Yes, in your delusional mind they lied so that is justification for your lie, is that it, kook? <snip remaining insane kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 16:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <q0amvat8ne26fgrf2b6lg4b4d2qe3nmcu4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #276216 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:02:55 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the towers. >>> >>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>> it fell just the same. >> >> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? > >Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other hitting >WTC 7 >...But you can try Dragons or Goziila You must have passed out before you saw the live coverage. You like video's. Here's one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqS1jaK2fvo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 17:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtfbg1$nhc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #276229 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:02:55 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the >>>> towers. >>>> >>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>>> it fell just the same. >>> >>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? >> >> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other >> hitting WTC 7 >> ...But you can try Dragons or Goziila > > You must have passed out before you saw the live coverage. > > You like video's. Here's one. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqS1jaK2fvo Am I supposed to believe that smoke and dust drifting into WTC 7 caused it to fall ? Because that is all the video shows,....no damage beyond some smoke stains. Perhaps you can explain how throwing dust against the concrete wall of WTC 7 caused fires to start inside. Better yet, don't tell me because I won;t be here looking at any more of your posts. I have new threads to start.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 21:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <52prcc-ph1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #276238 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:02:55 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the >>>>> towers. >>>>> >>>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>>>> it fell just the same. >>>> >>>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? >>> >>> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other >>> hitting WTC 7 >>> ...But you can try Dragons or Goziila >> >> You must have passed out before you saw the live coverage. >> >> You like video's. Here's one. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqS1jaK2fvo > > > > > > > > > Am I supposed to believe that smoke and dust drifting into WTC 7 caused it > to fall ? No, you are supposed to go get help for your mental problems, lunatic. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 09:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3065e23a73bb01f998c2b6@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #276244 |
In article <52prcc-ph1.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:02:55 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, > >>>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the > >>>>> towers. > >>>>> > >>>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and > >>>>> it fell just the same. > >>>> > >>>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? > >>> > >>> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other > >>> hitting WTC 7 > >>> ...But you can try Dragons or Goziila > >> > >> You must have passed out before you saw the live coverage. > >> > >> You like video's. Here's one. > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqS1jaK2fvo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am I supposed to believe that smoke and dust drifting into WTC 7 caused it > > to fall ? > > No, you are supposed to go get help for your mental problems, lunatic. She knows/thinks she's "special", so she will do anything to keep the Troofer religion alive. Even though it's been a rotting corpse for over 14 years now. If/when Troofery dies out, she won't be special anymore. She'll just be another mental patient. Her anger amuses me no end. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 20:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <urlmvalgrfepr969fn0d7c8jagbqtpv9tt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #276238 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:34:56 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:02:55 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the >>>>> towers. >>>>> >>>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>>>> it fell just the same. >>>> >>>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? >>> >>> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other >>> hitting WTC 7 >>> ...But you can try Dragons or Goziila >> >> You must have passed out before you saw the live coverage. >> >> You like video's. Here's one. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqS1jaK2fvo > >Am I supposed to believe that smoke and dust drifting into WTC 7 caused it >to fall ? > >Because that is all the video shows,... The video clearly shows the damage to the building. And it shows the damage from different angles. .no damage beyond some smoke stains. >Perhaps you can explain how throwing dust against the concrete wall of WTC 7 >caused fires to start inside. When part of the structure comes down due to falling debris, the fires start. >Better yet, don't tell me because I won;t be here looking at any more of >your posts. >I have new threads to start. > Run away .....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 14:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #276216 |
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo. u work for Iranian Jihadis eh faggot terrorist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 09:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3JydnXo2detggmHInZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #276241 |
"Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com... > On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling tower, > you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo. What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon physics is applied. And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 13:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nvOdnS-ChPt3wGHInZ2dnUU7-bednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #276292 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mthd76$24b$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 collapsed >>they always have to show cartoons? <G> > > Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is used > nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this case, they > used it to model what happens in response to certain events. > > (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly a > plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt WTC7?) That is exactly what NIST did with WTC1. NIST rebuilt one floor of WTC1 at Underwriters Laboratory and tried to get the floor to fail the way they claimed it did and it didn't happen so they had to resort to the use of cartoons where they never gave people the values they used in their cartoons. You can read more about what NIST did at: "Guest Column by Kevin Ryan - Science Died On 9/11" http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/02/17/guest-column-kevin-ryan-science-died-911/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 17:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mti14u$1p6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #276302 |
Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mthd76$24b$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> >> >> Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is used >> nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this case, >> they used it to model what happens in response to certain events. >> >> (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly a >> plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt WTC7?) > > That is exactly what NIST did with WTC1. NIST rebuilt one floor of > WTC1 at Underwriters Laboratory and tried to get the floor to fail the > way they claimed it did and it didn't happen so they had to resort to > the use of cartoons where they never gave people the values they used > in their cartoons. > > You can read more about what NIST did at: > "Guest Column by Kevin Ryan - Science Died On 9/11" > http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/02/17/guest-column-kevin-ryan-science-died-911/ I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....and I can make it show a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. Too bad real life isn't a computer game, huh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 09:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30672bf2947d219598c2be@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #276312 |
In article <mti14u$1p6$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Rocky wrote: > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > > news:mthd76$24b$1@pcls7.std.com... > >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >> > >>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 > >>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> > >> > >> Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is used > >> nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this case, > >> they used it to model what happens in response to certain events. > >> > >> (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly a > >> plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt WTC7?) > > > > That is exactly what NIST did with WTC1. NIST rebuilt one floor of > > WTC1 at Underwriters Laboratory and tried to get the floor to fail the > > way they claimed it did and it didn't happen so they had to resort to > > the use of cartoons where they never gave people the values they used > > in their cartoons. > > > > You can read more about what NIST did at: > > "Guest Column by Kevin Ryan - Science Died On 9/11" > > http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/02/17/guest-column-kevin-ryan-science-died-911/ > > > > > > > > I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....and I can make it show > a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. ~20 years and that's the best you can do? > > Too bad real life isn't a computer game, huh. Too bad Trooftardery doesn't make any sense, huh? -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6q7qva9eptgemmi9plbf9llgi0abbire86@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #276292 |
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com...
>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling tower,
>> you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo.
>
>What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for over 2
>seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon physics is applied.
>
Yes, in fact, it does.
>And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 collapsed
>they always have to show cartoons? <G>
Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong
would be too costly.
They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound
person would expect.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 07:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtjhn6$i96$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #276332 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com... >>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>> >>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling >>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo. >> >> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for >> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon physics >> is applied. >> > > Yes, in fact, it does. > >> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> > > Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong > would be too costly. > They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound > person would expect. I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....and I can make it show a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. Too bad real life isn't a computer game, huh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 11:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qd3rvapvpdgomeck6tn5gsagmm9kgel01d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #276341 |
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling
>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo.
>>>
>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for
>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon physics
>>> is applied.
>>
>> Yes, in fact, it does.
>>
>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7
>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G>
>>
>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong
>> would be too costly.
>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound
>> person would expect.
>
>
>
>I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....
Good for you.
>and I can make it show
>a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen.
>
Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other
neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to
master in 20 years, but maybe.
>Too bad real life isn't a computer game, huh.
Too bad what you claimed happened on 9/11/01 isn't real life,
huh?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 13:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtk7mn$a40$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #276360 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com... >>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: >>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling >>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo. >>>> >>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for >>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon >>>> physics is applied. >>> >>> Yes, in fact, it does. >>> >>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> >>> >>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong >>> would be too costly. >>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound >>> person would expect. >> >> >> >> I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,.... > > Good for you. > >> and I can make it show >> a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. >> > > Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other > neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to > master in 20 years, but maybe. I know far more than that. From both cad and even work I've done on computer games. It's amazing how apps allow you to manipulate or create completely new models of physics, that simply don't exist in the real world. Of course allowing other to examine you models is always the way to let them see why your program works the way it does. COMPUTER SIMULATIONS ARE WRITTEN AND CONTROLLED BY HUMANS. Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 05:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <081tva9s1c2uss24gib2bffih0q7lesm1u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #276374 |
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:59:09 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling
>>>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo.
>>>>>
>>>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for
>>>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon
>>>>> physics is applied.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, in fact, it does.
>>>>
>>>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7
>>>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G>
>>>>
>>>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong
>>>> would be too costly.
>>>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound
>>>> person would expect.
>>>
>>>
>>> I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....
>>
>> Good for you.
>>
>>> and I can make it show
>>> a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen.
>>
>> Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other
>> neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to
>> master in 20 years, but maybe.
>
>
>I know far more than that.
What you know and what you can do may not be the same thing. In
this context, it's clear you still haven't learned how to do anything
else with CAD.
>From both cad and even work I've done on computer games.
>
>It's amazing how apps allow you to manipulate or create completely new
>models of physics, that simply don't exist in the real world.
>
Not really all that amazing to anyone familiar with them.
>Of course allowing other to examine you models is always the way to let them
>see why your program works the way it does.
>
And many have been able to examine the models offered by NIST. In
fact, you've linked to a video that shows one of them. Roger has
linked to videos that show others.
>COMPUTER SIMULATIONS ARE WRITTEN AND CONTROLLED BY HUMANS.
True. But when they use data from the real world, the mentally
sound accept the computer models are an accurate representation of
reality. The mentally ill are, sadly, unable.
>
>Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life.
When has anyone claim it did?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 07:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtm6u5$ttn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #276419 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:59:09 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com... >>>>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: >>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling >>>>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo. >>>>>> >>>>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for >>>>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon >>>>>> physics is applied. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, in fact, it does. >>>>> >>>>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >>>>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> >>>>> >>>>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong >>>>> would be too costly. >>>>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound >>>>> person would expect. >>>> >>>> >>>> I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,.... >>> >>> Good for you. >>> >>>> and I can make it show >>>> a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. >>> >>> Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other >>> neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to >>> master in 20 years, but maybe. >> >> >> I know far more than that. > > What you know and what you can do may not be the same thing. In > this context, it's clear you still haven't learned how to do anything > else with CAD. > >> From both cad and even work I've done on computer games. >> >> It's amazing how apps allow you to manipulate or create completely new >> models of physics, that simply don't exist in the real world. >> > > Not really all that amazing to anyone familiar with them. > >> Of course allowing other to examine you models is always the way to >> let them see why your program works the way it does. >> > > And many have been able to examine the models offered by NIST. In > fact, you've linked to a video that shows one of them. Roger has > linked to videos that show others. > >> COMPUTER SIMULATIONS ARE WRITTEN AND CONTROLLED BY HUMANS. > > True. But when they use data from the real world, the mentally > sound accept the computer models are an accurate representation of > reality. The mentally ill are, sadly, unable. > >> >> Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life. > > When has anyone claim it did? When you crop out the answers I've already written and try to pretend thaty never existed. You prove why 9/11 was an inside job. ....Or you wouldn't have to try hiding anything
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 07:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <OfednWP-Bt6wOGPInZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #276422 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mtm6u5$ttn$1@dont-email.me... > > > K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:59:09 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com... >>>>>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling >>>>>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for >>>>>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon >>>>>>> physics is applied. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, in fact, it does. >>>>>> >>>>>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >>>>>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> >>>>>> >>>>>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong >>>>>> would be too costly. >>>>>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound >>>>>> person would expect. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,.... >>>> >>>> Good for you. >>>> >>>>> and I can make it show >>>>> a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen. >>>> >>>> Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other >>>> neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to >>>> master in 20 years, but maybe. >>> >>> >>> I know far more than that. >> >> What you know and what you can do may not be the same thing. In >> this context, it's clear you still haven't learned how to do anything >> else with CAD. >> >>> From both cad and even work I've done on computer games. >>> >>> It's amazing how apps allow you to manipulate or create completely new >>> models of physics, that simply don't exist in the real world. >>> >> >> Not really all that amazing to anyone familiar with them. >> >>> Of course allowing other to examine you models is always the way to >>> let them see why your program works the way it does. >>> >> >> And many have been able to examine the models offered by NIST. In >> fact, you've linked to a video that shows one of them. Roger has >> linked to videos that show others. >> >>> COMPUTER SIMULATIONS ARE WRITTEN AND CONTROLLED BY HUMANS. >> >> True. But when they use data from the real world, the mentally >> sound accept the computer models are an accurate representation of >> reality. The mentally ill are, sadly, unable. >> >>> >>> Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life. >> >> When has anyone claim it did? > > > > > > > > When you crop out the answers I've already written and try to pretend > thaty never existed. > You prove why 9/11 was an inside job. > > ....Or you wouldn't have to try hiding anything And yet if you crop out Kid Wills bs he puts it all back and in such a way it is impossible to find out where his reply really is. Kid Wills has obviously never posted to a moderated group because they will only allow you to keep what you are replying to. Kid Wills certainly took his physics lessons from Popeye and roadrunner cartoons and does not realize that a hollow jet that even floats can not make road runner cutouts in steel and concrete exoskeletons unless if the 767 was going 3 times the speed of sound and then it fly apart before it hit anything because they are not built for that speed especially near sea level. 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs Rocky Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cpfuva129uq250ga2js00gickvflrkj91n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #276423 |
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:22:09 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[...]
>>>> Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life.
>>>
>>> When has anyone claim it did?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> When you crop out the answers I've already written and try to pretend
>> thaty never existed.
>> You prove why 9/11 was an inside job.
>>
>> ....Or you wouldn't have to try hiding anything
>
>And yet if you crop out Kid Wills bs he puts it all back and in such a way
>it is impossible to find out where his reply really is.
>
Nothing of Bast's post was removed. But you already know this.
That you DISHONESTLY snip in an attempt to alter the context, and
I restore it only serves to further prove your mental defects make you
dishonest.
Snipping is fine, but acknowledge that you've done so, and don't
alter the context. But you have no choice in the matter. Your mind is
so screwed up, you will never be able to understand. And that is truly
sad.
>Kid Wills has obviously never posted to a moderated group because they will
>only allow you to keep what you are replying to.
Keep guessing at my real name. Of course, your mental defects
means you will OBSESS about Kid being it. You can't stop yourself.
>
>Kid Wills certainly took his physics lessons from Popeye and roadrunner
>cartoons and does not realize that a hollow jet that even floats can not
>make road runner cutouts in steel and concrete exoskeletons unless if the
>767 was going 3 times the speed of sound and then it fly apart before it hit
>anything because they are not built for that speed especially near sea
>level.
You clearly know nothing of physics.
>
>911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
This has already been addressed. It's been explained to you.
What do you think you gain by continuing to lie about this?
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 18:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7ofuva1kuhoqn5006188dbvjvgds40465n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #276422 |
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:57:13 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:59:09 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:44:39 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:29:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling
>>>>>>>> tower, you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for
>>>>>>> over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon
>>>>>>> physics is applied.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, in fact, it does.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7
>>>>>>> collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because building a new #7 just to prove your delusions wrong
>>>>>> would be too costly.
>>>>>> They used computer models, as any educated and mentally sound
>>>>>> person would expect.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been using CAD/CAM packages since the 1990's,....
>>>>
>>>> Good for you.
>>>>
>>>>> and I can make it show
>>>>> a sphere, rotate into itself on a computer screen.
>>>>
>>>> Good for you. In another 20 years you may learn how to do other
>>>> neat tricks with CAD. Probably not if this is all you've been able to
>>>> master in 20 years, but maybe.
>>>
>>>
>>> I know far more than that.
>>
>> What you know and what you can do may not be the same thing. In
>> this context, it's clear you still haven't learned how to do anything
>> else with CAD.
>>
>>> From both cad and even work I've done on computer games.
>>>
>>> It's amazing how apps allow you to manipulate or create completely new
>>> models of physics, that simply don't exist in the real world.
>>
>> Not really all that amazing to anyone familiar with them.
>>
>>> Of course allowing other to examine you models is always the way to
>>> let them see why your program works the way it does.
>>
>> And many have been able to examine the models offered by NIST. In
>> fact, you've linked to a video that shows one of them. Roger has
>> linked to videos that show others.
>>
>>> COMPUTER SIMULATIONS ARE WRITTEN AND CONTROLLED BY HUMANS.
>>
>> True. But when they use data from the real world, the mentally
>> sound accept the computer models are an accurate representation of
>> reality. The mentally ill are, sadly, unable.
>>
>>>
>>> Not by HAL from 2001......which ALSO never really existed in real life.
>>
>> When has anyone claim it did?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>When you crop out the answers I've already written and try to pretend thaty
>never existed.
I had only just asked when anyone claimed it did. There was
nothing for me to crop out.
>You prove why 9/11 was an inside job.
>
>....Or you wouldn't have to try hiding anything
What, in reality please, have I cropped out?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web