Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #281754 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-07 10:09 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-02-08 17:34 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 304 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-02-07 10:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 08:33 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-02-08 01:35 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 09:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 13:45 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 21:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 06:56 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:30 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-17 02:27 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:04 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 12:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-07 20:28 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 13:53 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-07 21:58 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 18:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-09 22:35 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:24 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 21:36 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 22:58 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 18:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 18:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 04:00 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 20:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 04:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 08:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 14:50 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-14 21:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-15 01:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 11:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 13:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 18:21 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 19:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:07 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 09:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-16 14:54 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:22 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 02:43 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 01:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:20 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 14:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 19:30 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 23:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:16 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 14:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-17 19:11 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:44 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 06:02 -0400
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:03 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:18 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 13:14 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-17 22:46 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:50 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 11:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 13:10 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 16:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:25 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-15 19:12 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:08 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:59 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 19:04 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 01:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:08 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:04 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 10:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:49 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 20:08 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 15:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 21:43 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-13 19:50 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 14:52 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 04:56 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:24 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Guess Who <don'temailme@youputz.cpom> - 2016-02-13 15:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-13 16:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-13 21:22 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:24 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-16 08:24 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-17 06:08 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:19 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-17 11:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:49 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-18 10:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 20:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-19 10:44 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 17:29 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 16:51 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 18:52 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-08 02:26 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:48 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:34 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 00:48 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 17:32 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-14 17:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-14 14:39 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 22:27 -0700
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:15 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:12 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 20:29 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:46 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 19:16 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-11 09:48 -0700
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:43 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 18:27 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 20:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-10 18:09 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:59 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:43 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 19:13 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 12:57 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:58 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 12:15 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 04:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:47 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 16:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:17 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-02-09 07:43 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:16 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:05 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 12:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:17 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-02-10 04:34 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:43 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-08 18:26 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 14:13 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 17:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 18:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 00:50 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:24 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 07:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-10 17:50 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 13:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-11 14:53 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-11 02:36 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 23:23 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 20:25 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 00:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-11 22:24 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-02-11 15:42 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-12 12:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-12 17:28 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 22:26 -0700
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-13 16:42 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:21 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:49 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 13:08 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:04 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-10 16:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 17:01 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:55 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:49 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 03:20 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-15 17:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 17:26 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-02-16 01:30 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 01:11 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:08 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:44 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:57 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:50 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-08 04:59 +0100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 14:00 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:26 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:42 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sergio <imvalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-08 16:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:09 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 09:10 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 17:07 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 11:41 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 00:06 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:55 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:53 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:46 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:52 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-13 11:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:35 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 02:41 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 19:22 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 21:35 -0700
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:39 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:33 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:06 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:29 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 13:53 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-08 17:19 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 01:01 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 21:03 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:48 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 20:54 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 16:58 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-09 22:20 +0000
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 18:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-10 16:46 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 03:58 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-14 20:51 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:32 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:06 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 17:19 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 17:23 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 19:28 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 11:37 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 12:09 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-08 22:45 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 12:44 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-09 17:33 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 18:40 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-10 03:18 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 11:56 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Justin tyme" <Justin_Tyme2003@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 11:55 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 04:41 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 08:59 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 12:57 +1100
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:47 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 09:02 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 19:31 -0500
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:05 -0600
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 18:22 -0800
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-07 21:24 -0700
Re: Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 17:34 -0800
Page 6 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 16 Next page →
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 10:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312fa8153d89341498c529@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #282244 |
In article <ls4bcb5gn3lg9e9hs8nrmfte51hanpcguc@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:01:11 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > [...] > > >> >So may I ask you, how do you justify the enormous amount of time an > >> >effort you apparently spent to read and occasionally answer all these > >> >posts in this newsgroup. > >> > >> I spend less than 30 minutes at a time on Usenet. It doesn't take > >> more than a few seconds to read a post, formulate a reply, write it > >> and post. > > > >How slowly do some of these people read and type? Jeez, they're always > >claiming I(and some others, including you) spend all this time on > >usenet, but they don't seem to understand I come and go and probably > >spend about a half hour a day, tops, reading and posting. > > I'm only really active in two groups at the time I write this. As > you may have noticed, I am far more active in the baldspot group. I > spend, maybe, 30 minutes a day total in it. Less then 30 here. > I can only conclude Thomas reads slowly. Since English is a second > language, and not likely to be one he uses more than German, it may > take him longer to read and reply. It would be understandable. > But to presume everyone is so limited is foolish. I've been accused many many times of spending "all my time" on usenet. It seems to be a major symptom of kOOktardery. The only period of time when I really spent a lot of time here was when I was recovering from knee surgery and spent a lot of time here to keep from being bored out of my mind. That was 8+ years ago. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 20:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <41rccbdpcggrejokdjn0p0uv85metjir8u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #282244 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 03:49:48 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:01:11 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> >wrote: > >[...] > >>> >So may I ask you, how do you justify the enormous amount of time an >>> >effort you apparently spent to read and occasionally answer all these >>> >posts in this newsgroup. >>> >>> I spend less than 30 minutes at a time on Usenet. It doesn't take >>> more than a few seconds to read a post, formulate a reply, write it >>> and post. >> >>How slowly do some of these people read and type? Jeez, they're always >>claiming I(and some others, including you) spend all this time on >>usenet, but they don't seem to understand I come and go and probably >>spend about a half hour a day, tops, reading and posting. > > I'm only really active in two groups at the time I write this. As >you may have noticed, I am far more active in the baldspot group. I >spend, maybe, 30 minutes a day total in it. Less then 30 here. > I can only conclude Thomas reads slowly. Since English is a second >language, and not likely to be one he uses more than German, it may >take him longer to read and reply. It would be understandable. > But to presume everyone is so limited is foolish. May I chime in, as Bast will be wanting to know....LOL. These days I probably spend on average of 15 to 30 minutes a day on Usenet. That's not to say I can't spend all night online, but 98% of my presence on the net is not in newsgroups but in forum based discussion groups.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 10:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dio6gjFm731U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #282244 |
Am 18.02.2016 10:49, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3): > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:01:11 -0500, BDK<Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > [...] > >>>> So may I ask you, how do you justify the enormous amount of time an >>>> effort you apparently spent to read and occasionally answer all these >>>> posts in this newsgroup. >>> >>> I spend less than 30 minutes at a time on Usenet. It doesn't take >>> more than a few seconds to read a post, formulate a reply, write it >>> and post. >> >> How slowly do some of these people read and type? Jeez, they're always >> claiming I(and some others, including you) spend all this time on >> usenet, but they don't seem to understand I come and go and probably >> spend about a half hour a day, tops, reading and posting. > > I'm only really active in two groups at the time I write this. As > you may have noticed, I am far more active in the baldspot group. I > spend, maybe, 30 minutes a day total in it. Less then 30 here. > I can only conclude Thomas reads slowly. Since English is a second > language, and not likely to be one he uses more than German, it may > take him longer to read and reply. It would be understandable. > But to presume everyone is so limited is foolish. > I read about five groups and about 30 messages a day (on average). The sum of all messages per day is possibly 600 (in all of these groups combined). So I read about 5% from all the traffic, but mainly from the threads I take part. And I write maybe five messages per day on average (sometimes a few more). So it is unlikely, that I read a certain article someone wrote, if that is not in a thread I follow. The amount of time varies and depends on how difficult the subject is and whether or not I have an idea about it. But usually I spent something like half an hour to one hour on reading and writing. I could read more, but don't want, since reading too much crap does not make you smarter. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 11:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31228a1ddd8ae81c98c4ea@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #281757 |
In article <2pLty.364769$9A4.248796@fx40.iad>, none@gmail.com says... > > On 02/07/2016 11:09 AM, Rocky wrote: > > Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrYcYZYxX4 > > > > Yep, not only were we lied to about 9/11 but the trip to the moon was a sham > > and probably hundreds of other things too. > > > > Rocky > > Wrong. HVAC tells me that politicians NEVER lie and that you can ALWAYS > believe EVERY WORD that your government tells you (and every word HVAC > tells you too!). That is a given! Odd, HVAC hasn't posted anything much lately, and not believing in kOOkery is not indicative of trusting anything the government says. They aren't always connected, except in the minds of you kOOks. Well, as close to a mind as you've got. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 17:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9b4hv$c3b$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #281794 |
BDK wrote: > In article <2pLty.364769$9A4.248796@fx40.iad>, none@gmail.com says... >> >> On 02/07/2016 11:09 AM, Rocky wrote: >>> Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrYcYZYxX4 >>> >>> Yep, not only were we lied to about 9/11 but the trip to the moon was >>> a sham and probably hundreds of other things too. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> Wrong. HVAC tells me that politicians NEVER lie and that you can ALWAYS >> believe EVERY WORD that your government tells you (and every word HVAC >> tells you too!). That is a given! > > Odd, HVAC hasn't posted anything much lately, and not believing in > kOOkery is not indicative of trusting anything the government says. > They aren't always connected, except in the minds of you kOOks. Well, as > close to a mind as you've got. Why not sign up for fighting in Iraq, or Lybia. or Syria ? Your gubberment says it will be good to have a war, and good lil' patrioyts like you would make excellent landfill.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 22:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31232967b18ba3a798c4f6@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #281815 |
In article <n9b4hv$c3b$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > BDK wrote: > > In article <2pLty.364769$9A4.248796@fx40.iad>, none@gmail.com says... > >> > >> On 02/07/2016 11:09 AM, Rocky wrote: > >>> Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrYcYZYxX4 > >>> > >>> Yep, not only were we lied to about 9/11 but the trip to the moon was > >>> a sham and probably hundreds of other things too. > >>> > >>> Rocky > >> > >> Wrong. HVAC tells me that politicians NEVER lie and that you can ALWAYS > >> believe EVERY WORD that your government tells you (and every word HVAC > >> tells you too!). That is a given! > > > > Odd, HVAC hasn't posted anything much lately, and not believing in > > kOOkery is not indicative of trusting anything the government says. > > They aren't always connected, except in the minds of you kOOks. Well, as > > close to a mind as you've got. > > > > > > Why not sign up for fighting in Iraq, or Lybia. or Syria ? Too old, bad knees.. > Your gubberment says it will be good to have a war, and good lil' patrioyts > like you would make excellent landfill. I pay a lot of taxes, so the govmint loves me. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 03:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <a4djbb9q5le3g8gg5k1e76aov0jpl87o5f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #281815 |
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:26:52 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>BDK wrote:
>> In article <2pLty.364769$9A4.248796@fx40.iad>, none@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On 02/07/2016 11:09 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>>> Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrYcYZYxX4
>>>>
>>>> Yep, not only were we lied to about 9/11 but the trip to the moon was
>>>> a sham and probably hundreds of other things too.
>>>>
>>>> Rocky
>>>
>>> Wrong. HVAC tells me that politicians NEVER lie and that you can ALWAYS
>>> believe EVERY WORD that your government tells you (and every word HVAC
>>> tells you too!). That is a given!
>>
>> Odd, HVAC hasn't posted anything much lately, and not believing in
>> kOOkery is not indicative of trusting anything the government says.
>> They aren't always connected, except in the minds of you kOOks. Well, as
>> close to a mind as you've got.
>
>
>Why not sign up for fighting in Iraq, or Lybia. or Syria ?
Go for it. Unless you're a coward.
>Your gubberment says it will be good to have a war, and good lil' patrioyts
>like you would make excellent landfill.
You'll be missed.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-07 17:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n98ga2$et9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #281754 |
Rocky wrote: > Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrYcYZYxX4 > > Yep, not only were we lied to about 9/11 but the trip to the moon was a > sham and probably hundreds of other things too. > > Rocky Of course the moon landings were hoaxed. That Armstong went into hiding and became a virtual hermit because he was ashamed to have to live a lie, is more proof than anyone needed. That NASA "lost" most of the video recordings and photos, just makes it easier to keep anyone from seeing something that they goofed on. Even the IRS never LOSES files or data. Unless thay want to. And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE fatality. To ths day with KNOWN technology, they still can't get a human even to the van allen belts, and have them survive. Of course the government very likely have technology now, that the public will never know about.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-07 16:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <Q5SdnUSBQcP9VyrLnZ2dnUU7-bmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #281766 |
On 2/7/16 4:29 PM, Bast wrote: > > Of course the moon landings were hoaxed. > That Armst[r]ong went into hiding and became a virtual hermit because he was > ashamed to have to live a lie, is more proof than anyone needed. > That NASA "lost" most of the video recordings and photos, just makes it > easier to keep anyone from seeing something that they goofed on. > Even the IRS never LOSES files or data. Unless thay want to. > > And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's > technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE fatality. > To th[i]s day with KNOWN technology, they still can't get a human even to the > van allen belts, and have them survive. > > Of course the government very likely have technology now, that the public > will never know about. > > Equation shows that large-scale conspiracies would quickly reveal themselves > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-equation-large-scale-conspiracies-quickly-reveal.html > If you're thinking of creating a massive conspiracy, you may be > better scaling back your plans, according to an Oxford University > researcher. > > While we can all keep a secret, a study by Dr David Robert Grimes > suggests that large groups of people sharing in a conspiracy will > very quickly give themselves away. The study is published online by > journal PLOS ONE. > -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-07 18:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <mjpfbblvdtqamsbe9ujpb9kiamdhfitlhj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #281766 |
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:29:03 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>Rocky wrote:
>> Moon Hoax - latest proof July 2015
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awrYcYZYxX4
>>
>> Yep, not only were we lied to about 9/11 but the trip to the moon was a
>> sham and probably hundreds of other things too.
>>
>> Rocky
>
>
>
>Of course the moon landings were hoaxed.
The available evidence shows it was not. If you have any valid,
verifiable evidence that will counter what is available, present it.
>That Armstong went into hiding and became a virtual hermit because he was
>ashamed to have to live a lie, is more proof than anyone needed.
Except that he didn't.
Well, near the end of his life he did. But that was due to
illness. He could no longer be the public figure he once was.
>That NASA "lost" most of the video recordings and photos, just makes it
>easier to keep anyone from seeing something that they goofed on.
>Even the IRS never LOSES files or data. Unless thay want to.
Um, the IRS and NASA are two different organizations. And the IRS
has lost files and data.
It was fairly big news when the E-mails from Lois Lerner were
lost. And lost forever, it appears. Since this seriously harmed the
IRS, it's not too likely it was done with intent.
>And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's
>technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE fatality.
Technically, you are correct. Virgil Grissom, Edward White, and
Roger Chaffee make up THREE people, not one.
Isn't it interesting how reality and your claims are so often in
conflict?
>To ths day with KNOWN technology, they still can't get a human even to the
>van allen belts, and have them survive.
Sure they can. Given the short amount of time anyone would be
exposed to radiation, it's not too dangerous.
The astronauts spend roughly four hours in the belts. That's not
enough exposure to kill anyone not already dying.
>
>Of course the government very likely have technology now, that the public
>will never know about.
I presume the government has tech we don't yet know about. It
would make sense. It's not as if they're going to reveal every secret
they have. National security ensures there are items we aren't told
about.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 02:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n98uce$rtb$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #281766 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's >technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE fatality. Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 03:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <e2pgbb9n8k8r9nbagct0tbon8ikifppbiq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #281781 |
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 02:26:22 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:
>"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes:
>
>>And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's
>>technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE fatality.
>
>Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967?
Note that Bast is claiming "with not even ONE fatality." They
make up three. Technically, Bast is correct. Not in the highly
deceptive way in which she presents her claim, but technically.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 08:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9a62u$d44$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #281781 |
Michael Moroney wrote: > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >> And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's >> technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE fatality. > > Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967? Not in any appolo mission. They burned up sitting on a launch pad during a TEST,.....it wasn't even supposed to be a "flight" NASA couldn't even keep astronauts alive ON EARTH. But it was well known that Grissom, was already exposing the lies of Apollo,....so he needed to disappear.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 11:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31228d4873bd809e98c4ed@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #281788 |
In article <n9a62u$d44$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Michael Moroney wrote: > > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > > > >> And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's > >> technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE fatality. > > > > Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967? > > > > > > > Not in any appolo mission. > They burned up sitting on a launch pad during a TEST,.....it wasn't even > supposed to be a "flight" > > NASA couldn't even keep astronauts alive ON EARTH. > But it was well known that Grissom, was already exposing the lies of > Apollo,....so he needed to disappear. Another conspiracy? How did they do all of them, but only you, um, special people know about it? -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 17:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9b4vh$dmh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #281797 |
BDK wrote: > In article <n9a62u$d44$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >> >> Michael Moroney wrote: >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>> >>>> And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's >>>> technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE >>>> fatality. >>> >>> Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Not in any appolo mission. >> They burned up sitting on a launch pad during a TEST,.....it wasn't >> even supposed to be a "flight" >> >> NASA couldn't even keep astronauts alive ON EARTH. >> But it was well known that Grissom, was already exposing the lies of >> Apollo,....so he needed to disappear. > > Another conspiracy? How did they do all of them, but only you, um, > special people know about it? Did you know that the majority of the world is now fully aware of NASA's hoaxes ? And you have maybe 4-5 trolls who post here telling us how all knowing and powerful the Amerikka is. But hey,.....you can trust your gubberment to send you to fight in the middle east. to get yourself away from all us "kooks" You will even get a sticky gold star.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 17:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <557ibbll37k1k0acm2sc30nhsabd8m011e@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #281816 |
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:34:06 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >BDK wrote: >> In article <n9a62u$d44$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >>> >>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >>>> >>>>> And each year we learn more about WHY it was impossible for 1960's >>>>> technology to have done what they claim,....with not even ONE >>>>> fatality. >>>> >>>> Chaffee, Grissom and White didn't die on January 27, 1967? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Not in any appolo mission. >>> They burned up sitting on a launch pad during a TEST,.....it wasn't >>> even supposed to be a "flight" >>> >>> NASA couldn't even keep astronauts alive ON EARTH. >>> But it was well known that Grissom, was already exposing the lies of >>> Apollo,....so he needed to disappear. >> >> Another conspiracy? How did they do all of them, but only you, um, >> special people know about it? > > > > > >Did you know that the majority of the world is now fully aware of NASA's >hoaxes ? If you believe that then explain why the Soviet Union has remained quiet for 50 years?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 00:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n9bd1g$qor$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #281821 |
Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: >If you believe that then explain why the Soviet Union has remained >quiet for 50 years? The Soviet Union was only silent for about 22 years because they ceased to exist in 1991. Russia after them still kept quiet, however. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the existence of a big listening station they had in the Ukraine, built explicitly for listening in on the US moon program, was revealed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 20:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9bedj$fdq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #281824 |
Michael Moroney wrote: > Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: > >> If you believe that then explain why the Soviet Union has remained >> quiet for 50 years? > > The Soviet Union was only silent for about 22 years because they ceased > to exist in 1991. Russia after them still kept quiet, however. > > After the fall of the Soviet Union, the existence of a big listening > station they had in the Ukraine, built explicitly for listening in on > the US moon program, was revealed. Where? Was it in the National enquirer ?....Next to the story of where Hitler had a face transplant and is running a ice-creme shop in Idaho.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 22:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31232a1b62eff57098c4f8@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #281829 |
In article <n9bedj$fdq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Michael Moroney wrote: > > Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes: > > > >> If you believe that then explain why the Soviet Union has remained > >> quiet for 50 years? > > > > The Soviet Union was only silent for about 22 years because they ceased > > to exist in 1991. Russia after them still kept quiet, however. > > > > After the fall of the Soviet Union, the existence of a big listening > > station they had in the Ukraine, built explicitly for listening in on > > the US moon program, was revealed. > > > > > Where? > Was it in the National enquirer ?....Next to the story of where Hitler had a > face transplant and is running a ice-creme shop in Idaho. Now that sounds like something you would believe. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 03:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <v7djbb9gdo07q5scdva6ki8p4kbupddgfs@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #281829 |
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:15:13 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>
>>> If you believe that then explain why the Soviet Union has remained
>>> quiet for 50 years?
>>
>> The Soviet Union was only silent for about 22 years because they ceased
>> to exist in 1991. Russia after them still kept quiet, however.
>>
>> After the fall of the Soviet Union, the existence of a big listening
>> station they had in the Ukraine, built explicitly for listening in on
>> the US moon program, was revealed.
>
>
>
>
>Where?
Ukraine. Didn't you read what Michael posted?
I don't know if Michael means the station in Chernihiv or not. It
was a listening station. I don't know if it was built solely for
listening in on the U.S. moon program.
>Was it in the National enquirer ?....Next to the story of where Hitler had a
>face transplant and is running a ice-creme shop in Idaho.
You have the oddest delusions.
--
Shill #3.
Strategic Writer, Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web