Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #272185 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-10 15:54 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 74 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 15:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 16:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:59 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 17:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 22:41 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 09:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 14:07 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 15:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 20:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 16:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 22:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 17:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 23:29 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-12 05:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 16:58 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 15:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 21:09 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-12 19:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-12 18:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 16:29 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:30 -0500
Caught K the Kook in a farce (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:51 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in a farce (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:30 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in a farce (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 09:31 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in a farce (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 14:52 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in aBIG FARCE (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 15:46 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in aBIG FARCE (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:23 -0500
Re: Caught K the Kook in aBIG FARCE (was: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:21 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 22:02 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 17:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 22:56 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 09:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 18:50 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 15:00 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 20:37 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 16:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 22:30 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 17:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 23:31 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-14 16:47 +0100
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:25 +0100
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 17:11 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 14:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:19 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-10 23:27 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 09:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 18:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 15:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 20:42 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 16:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 22:33 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 09:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-11 15:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-18 06:45 +0200
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-13 14:27 -0700
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-13 14:43 -0700
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-15 05:39 +0200
2 Topaz stop right there (was: Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:17 -0500
Re: 2 Topaz stop right there (was: Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 10:06 -0500
Re: 2 Topaz stop right there (was: Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 10:26 -0500
Re: 2 Topaz stop right there Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 16:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1q6dnbkQG5b-_lfInZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #272273 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:813q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:uosp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:8pmn9c-r7m.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:eljn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>>>>> obsession >>>>>>> with capitalizing words like "television". >>>>>> >>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't like the fact your Television is really >>>>>> your >>>>>> Lord >>>>>> and Master because you will accept everything it tells you as truth. >>>>>> <G> >>>>>> >>>>>> So, because you worship your Television set I have to use a capital >>>>>> later >>>>>> to >>>>>> signify your Television set is God to you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> The lunatic raves on. >>>>> >>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television". >>>> >>>> You are boring, mindless and factless. >>> >>> You are blazingly stupid and quite insane. >> >> Thanks for proving the point I made earlier. > > The only point you have is the one on top of your head, lunatic. Your inability to win a jury trial 12 to 0 clearly shows because of your failure to face any hard facts about 9/11. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 22:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ml9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #272278 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:813q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:uosp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:8pmn9c-r7m.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:eljn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>>>>>> obsession >>>>>>>> with capitalizing words like "television". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't like the fact your Television is really >>>>>>> your >>>>>>> Lord >>>>>>> and Master because you will accept everything it tells you as truth. >>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, because you worship your Television set I have to use a capital >>>>>>> later >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> signify your Television set is God to you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>> >>>>>> The lunatic raves on. >>>>>> >>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>>>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television". >>>>> >>>>> You are boring, mindless and factless. >>>> >>>> You are blazingly stupid and quite insane. >>> >>> Thanks for proving the point I made earlier. >> >> The only point you have is the one on top of your head, lunatic. > > Your inability to win a jury trial 12 to 0 clearly shows because of your > failure to face any hard facts about 9/11. <G> > > Rocky I have never had to face a trial of any kind, kook boi, nor have most people. But then again most people don't rant about imagined nuclear bombs and capitalize words like "television" and "surviving". -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 17:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ltidndPA-r0k5FfInZ2dnUU7-SOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #272282 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:ml9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:813q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:uosp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:8pmn9c-r7m.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:eljn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>>>>>>> obsession >>>>>>>>> with capitalizing words like "television". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't like the fact your Television is really >>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>> Lord >>>>>>>> and Master because you will accept everything it tells you as >>>>>>>> truth. >>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, because you worship your Television set I have to use a capital >>>>>>>> later >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> signify your Television set is God to you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The lunatic raves on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>>>>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television". >>>>>> >>>>>> You are boring, mindless and factless. >>>>> >>>>> You are blazingly stupid and quite insane. >>>> >>>> Thanks for proving the point I made earlier. >>> >>> The only point you have is the one on top of your head, lunatic. >> >> Your inability to win a jury trial 12 to 0 clearly shows because of your >> failure to face any hard facts about 9/11. <G> >> >> Rocky > > I have never had to face a trial of any kind, kook boi, nor have > most people. > > But then again most people don't rant about imagined nuclear bombs > and capitalize words like "television" and "surviving". You always drift away from the facts and they are the "Surviving Corners" of the Twin Towers were much higher than any pile of debris from the Twin Towers and do you really think jet fuel could do a better job on leveling a building than a "Controlled Demolition?:" Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 23:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <l6dq9c-da3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #272284 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:ml9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:813q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:uosp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:8pmn9c-r7m.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:eljn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>>>>>>>> obsession >>>>>>>>>> with capitalizing words like "television". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't like the fact your Television is really >>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>> Lord >>>>>>>>> and Master because you will accept everything it tells you as >>>>>>>>> truth. >>>>>>>>> <G> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So, because you worship your Television set I have to use a capital >>>>>>>>> later >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> signify your Television set is God to you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The lunatic raves on. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>>>>>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are boring, mindless and factless. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are blazingly stupid and quite insane. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for proving the point I made earlier. >>>> >>>> The only point you have is the one on top of your head, lunatic. >>> >>> Your inability to win a jury trial 12 to 0 clearly shows because of your >>> failure to face any hard facts about 9/11. <G> >>> >>> Rocky >> >> I have never had to face a trial of any kind, kook boi, nor have >> most people. >> >> But then again most people don't rant about imagined nuclear bombs >> and capitalize words like "television" and "surviving". > > You always drift away from the facts and they are the "Surviving Corners" of > the Twin Towers were much higher than any pile of debris from the Twin > Towers and do you really think jet fuel could do a better job on leveling a > building than a "Controlled Demolition?:" > > Rocky Why are "Surviving Corners" and "Controlled Demolition" capitalized, kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 04:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <614msatooiaqbgr78bs52k7ohpsobgvp1d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #272284 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:39:27 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[...]
>>>>> Thanks for proving the point I made earlier.
>>>>
>>>> The only point you have is the one on top of your head, lunatic.
>>>
>>> Your inability to win a jury trial 12 to 0 clearly shows because of your
>>> failure to face any hard facts about 9/11. <G>
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>
>> I have never had to face a trial of any kind, kook boi, nor have
>> most people.
>>
>> But then again most people don't rant about imagined nuclear bombs
>> and capitalize words like "television" and "surviving".
>
>You always drift away from the facts and they are the "Surviving Corners" of
>the Twin Towers were much higher than any pile of debris from the Twin
>Towers and do you really think jet fuel could do a better job on leveling a
>building than a "Controlled Demolition?:"
Please provide your evidence that jet fuel alone cause the towers
to collapse. Bar you're having been caught in ANOTHER lie, you'll
produce the evidence.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-14 16:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mql2f0$5ks$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #272296 |
On 12/08/2015 10:21, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:39:27 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > [...] > >>>>>> Thanks for proving the point I made earlier. >>>>> >>>>> The only point you have is the one on top of your head, lunatic. >>>> >>>> Your inability to win a jury trial 12 to 0 clearly shows because of your >>>> failure to face any hard facts about 9/11. <G> >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> I have never had to face a trial of any kind, kook boi, nor have >>> most people. >>> >>> But then again most people don't rant about imagined nuclear bombs >>> and capitalize words like "television" and "surviving". >> >> You always drift away from the facts and they are the "Surviving Corners" of >> the Twin Towers were much higher than any pile of debris from the Twin >> Towers and do you really think jet fuel could do a better job on leveling a >> building than a "Controlled Demolition?:" > > Please provide your evidence that jet fuel alone cause the towers > to collapse. Bar you're having been caught in ANOTHER lie, you'll > produce the evidence. > Two days of tumbleweed later. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 09:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mqphat$1k8$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #272296 |
On 12/08/2015 10:21, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:39:27 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > [...] > >>>>>> Thanks for proving the point I made earlier. >>>>> >>>>> The only point you have is the one on top of your head, lunatic. >>>> >>>> Your inability to win a jury trial 12 to 0 clearly shows because of your >>>> failure to face any hard facts about 9/11. <G> >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> I have never had to face a trial of any kind, kook boi, nor have >>> most people. >>> >>> But then again most people don't rant about imagined nuclear bombs >>> and capitalize words like "television" and "surviving". >> >> You always drift away from the facts and they are the "Surviving Corners" of >> the Twin Towers were much higher than any pile of debris from the Twin >> Towers and do you really think jet fuel could do a better job on leveling a >> building than a "Controlled Demolition?:" > > Please provide your evidence that jet fuel alone cause the towers > to collapse. Bar you're having been caught in ANOTHER lie, you'll > produce the evidence. > Still waiting for your answer. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 04:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rv3msatk91m2hl0118bdoeu6rpbcqeoc20@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #272278 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:04:02 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:813q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uosp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:8pmn9c-r7m.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:eljn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and
>>>>>>>> obsession
>>>>>>>> with capitalizing words like "television".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't like the fact your Television is really
>>>>>>> your Lord and Master because you will accept everything it tells you as truth.
>>>>>>> <G>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, because you worship your Television set I have to use a capital
>>>>>>> later to signify your Television set is God to you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The lunatic raves on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and
>>>>>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television".
>>>>>
>>>>> You are boring, mindless and factless.
>>>>
>>>> You are blazingly stupid and quite insane.
>>>
>>> Thanks for proving the point I made earlier.
>>
>> The only point you have is the one on top of your head, lunatic.
>
>Your inability to win a jury trial 12 to 0 clearly shows because of your
>failure to face any hard facts about 9/11. <G>
Please provide your evidence that Jim has ever needed to defend
himself in a jury trial. You claim he did, and lost or won with 11 or
less votes. Bar this claim of yours being yet another of you MANY
lies, you'll produce the evidence.
If you are lying, still, you'll offer only avoidance. Presuming
you can bring yourself to acknowledge my request.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 04:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ot3msa9bd4lfheka85falbtpro8i0rbl1j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #272269 |
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:00:30 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:uosp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:8pmn9c-r7m.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:eljn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and
>>>>>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television".
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't like the fact your Television is really your
>>>>> Lord and Master because you will accept everything it tells you as truth.
>>>>> <G>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, because you worship your Television set I have to use a capital
>>>>> later to signify your Television set is God to you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky
>>>>
>>>> The lunatic raves on.
>>>>
>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and
>>>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television".
>>>
>>> You are boring, mindless and factless.
>>
>> You are blazingly stupid and quite insane.
>
>Thanks for proving the point I made earlier.
>
You have proved that you're stupid (unable to learn). I don't
think you're mentally ill. I presume mental illness is what Jim means
by claiming you're insane.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 17:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oabs9c-76p.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #272294 |
In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:00:30 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>news:uosp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:8pmn9c-r7m.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:eljn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>>>>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television". >>>>>> >>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't like the fact your Television is really your >>>>>> Lord and Master because you will accept everything it tells you as truth. >>>>>> <G> >>>>>> >>>>>> So, because you worship your Television set I have to use a capital >>>>>> later to signify your Television set is God to you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> The lunatic raves on. >>>>> >>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television". >>>> >>>> You are boring, mindless and factless. >>> >>> You are blazingly stupid and quite insane. >> >>Thanks for proving the point I made earlier. >> > > You have proved that you're stupid (unable to learn). I don't > think you're mentally ill. I presume mental illness is what Jim means > by claiming you're insane. Blazingly stupid and a delusional paranoid. I knew someone much like him, though not so stupid. A perfectly normal person who one day started babbling about a "blue team" and a "red team" and on who's side various people were on, as well as tales of being watched. This continued to digress until action in the form of a butcher knife was taken against the "team leaders", actually family members. It fortunately ended without fatalities but with institutionalizing the individual. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <b4pnsa1srlgfhkpib5ks325aeddi4rhtl2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #272318 |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:11:20 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:00:30 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>news:uosp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:8pmn9c-r7m.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:eljn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and
>>>>>>>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't like the fact your Television is really your
>>>>>>> Lord and Master because you will accept everything it tells you as truth.
>>>>>>> <G>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, because you worship your Television set I have to use a capital
>>>>>>> later to signify your Television set is God to you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The lunatic raves on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and
>>>>>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television".
>>>>>
>>>>> You are boring, mindless and factless.
>>>>
>>>> You are blazingly stupid and quite insane.
>>>
>>>Thanks for proving the point I made earlier.
>>>
>>
>> You have proved that you're stupid (unable to learn). I don't
>> think you're mentally ill. I presume mental illness is what Jim means
>> by claiming you're insane.
>
>Blazingly stupid and a delusional paranoid.
>
Stupid? Yes.
Delusional? Yes.
Paranoid? I don't see it.
>I knew someone much like him, though not so stupid.
>
>A perfectly normal person who one day started babbling about a "blue
>team" and a "red team" and on who's side various people were on, as
>well as tales of being watched.
Sounds like Robert Desko.
>
>This continued to digress until action in the form of a butcher
>knife was taken against the "team leaders", actually family members.
>
>It fortunately ended without fatalities but with institutionalizing
>the individual.
YIKES! I'm glad he wasn't able to harm anyone.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 14:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mqdhaf$u4q$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #272248 |
On 8/11/2015 9:10 AM, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:8pmn9c-r7m.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:eljn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>> obsession >>>> with capitalizing words like "television". >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because you don't like the fact your Television is really your >>> Lord >>> and Master because you will accept everything it tells you as truth. <G> >>> >>> So, because you worship your Television set I have to use a capital later >>> to >>> signify your Television set is God to you. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> The lunatic raves on. >> >> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >> obsession with capitalizing words like "television". > > You are boring, mindless and factless. > > and you dont have any facts, and it is mindless and boring, and an OOOOLLLDDD subject from long ago, a dead subject, dumb and dead. ( and go get a real Job the Twin tower stuff is stale, pasty white, dead, nobody gets excited about that anymore...)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 09:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <IfednWnO6cVVyFbInZ2dnUU7-YednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #272265 |
"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message news:mqdhaf$u4q$3@speranza.aioe.org... > On 8/11/2015 9:10 AM, Rocky wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:8pmn9c-r7m.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:eljn9c-arl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>>>> obsession >>>>> with capitalizing words like "television". >>>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't like the fact your Television is really your >>>> Lord >>>> and Master because you will accept everything it tells you as truth. >>>> <G> >>>> >>>> So, because you worship your Television set I have to use a capital >>>> later >>>> to >>>> signify your Television set is God to you. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> The lunatic raves on. >>> >>> The correct medications might eliminate your bizarre delusions and >>> obsession with capitalizing words like "television". >> >> You are boring, mindless and factless. >> >> > > and you dont have any facts, Sure I do and if you go back to the video in the OP you would have known it. And I can even add 1. The photos of the alleged hijackers were from the wrong airport. 2. The movies of the alleged hijackers were not date and time stamped so they were worthless. 3. The use of Crisis Actors and CGIs in Nuke York City mean the only hijackers they needed were the ones that took Flight 175 and Flight 93 to Cleveland where they both landed safely so the hijackers could get back to their family. < REST OF YOUR BS WAS SNIPPED > And don't forget the fact so little remained of the Twin Towers proves that they were not a collapse of a Controlled Demolition. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 23:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mqbc08$bvc$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #272185 |
Oh, look. A kooktard posting WTC conspiracies to an off-topic group! I thought all the 911 kooktards died of terminal stupidity years ago.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 09:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <A82dnSim0e3UnlfInZ2dnUU7-QGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #272210 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mqbc08$bvc$3@pcls7.std.com... > Oh, look. A kooktard posting WTC conspiracies to an off-topic group! I > thought all the 911 kooktards died of terminal stupidity years ago. Oh bullshit because you didn't think or you would know there were a lot of inconsistencies in the bullshit your Television told you about 9/11. -------- OP Below -------------------- 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was the crash dynamics. All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down on impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to get you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were real. BTW if you look close at the crash dynamics of the jets going into the Twin Towers you will see a small flash on impact. That flash was only used to synchronize the real world with the bogus world so now you know the real reason for that flash. <G> FYI for those that do not know about nukes they have a "Vaporization Range" which on modern nukes is adjustable. So all the 9/11 perpetraitors had to do was make some adjustments to vaporize the Twin Towers right to the bogus impacts so they appeared to be crushed by the top part of the towers. But if the Twin Towers were crushed why did so much survive that was out of easy range for the deep underground nukes that were under WTC3 and WTC4? https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/tag/ground-zero/ And I've looked at the link above. While it contains a lot of good information it fails to address that the "Surviving Corners" of the Twin Towers can be used to figure out where the deep underground nukes were detonated. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 18:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <40tp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #272249 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mqbc08$bvc$3@pcls7.std.com... >> Oh, look. A kooktard posting WTC conspiracies to an off-topic group! I >> thought all the 911 kooktards died of terminal stupidity years ago. > > Oh bullshit because you didn't think or you would know there were a lot of > inconsistencies in the bullshit your Television told you about 9/11. > > -------- OP Below -------------------- > > 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 > > And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was the > crash dynamics. > > All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing > debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down on > impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to get > you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were real. A crashing airplane does not slow down instantly and there are thousands of eyewitnesses to the planes hitting the buildings. You are blazingly stupid and quite insane. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 15:25 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) |
| Message-ID | <qq-dnWCkaM30x1fInZ2dnUU7-I2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #272262 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:40tp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:mqbc08$bvc$3@pcls7.std.com... >>> Oh, look. A kooktard posting WTC conspiracies to an off-topic group! I >>> thought all the 911 kooktards died of terminal stupidity years ago. >> >> Oh bullshit because you didn't think or you would know there were a lot >> of >> inconsistencies in the bullshit your Television told you about 9/11. >> >> -------- OP Below -------------------- >> >> 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 >> >> And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was >> the >> crash dynamics. >> >> All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing >> debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down on >> impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to >> get >> you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were real. > > A crashing airplane does not slow down instantly and there are thousands > of eyewitnesses to the planes hitting the buildings. Oh yes, because they were watching the CGIs on your Lord and Master the Television Set or they heard a few of the Crisis Actors speak. DUH. BTW you really need to learn about "Crisis Actors" before you take everything they say as true and I can help you with that. See: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crisis_actor Besides there were also a lot people and videos that didn't see anything or show anything about jets in Nuke York City. See: 9/11 no planes compilation - interesting! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw And a video of what might have been the very first no-planer that was broadcast. 911 FOX - an eye-witness says it was a bomb, no plane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq1-BCeNcm0 And notice that the other guy says "that is what we heard" and then he says "We saw it on Television." Pretty funny huh? In other words all your bullshit about two 767s in Nuke York City is just that and the crash dynamics prove they were just CGIs and not real jets. But not only did the crash dynamics prove they were bogus the fact one of the wings on the alleged Flight 175 faded in and out also proves it was just a CGI too. Note the only way to recreate that disappearing wing trick on the alleged Flight 175 is with 3D software and let the 3D image reflect the sky. Plus with the 3D image they built of Nuke York City they could have made millions of crash videos from any different angle. And if you ever wonder why some of the crash videos made it to the news so quickly it is because a few of the crash videos were prepared before the alleged crashes even took place. <G> And do not forget to notice the flash when the CGI hits one of the Twin Towers because that flash was used to synchronize the bogus CGIs with the real world. <G> And do not forget to notice the videos that have a jet ramming the Twin Towers also breaks away almost instantly so that entire deal could have been a CGI too. And there is proof that the Naudet Brother's film was clearly edited so it looks like the hole in the North Tower was really big enough for a 767 because in real life it was not so what do you think about that? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 20:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) |
| Message-ID | <1b3q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #272270 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:40tp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:mqbc08$bvc$3@pcls7.std.com... >>>> Oh, look. A kooktard posting WTC conspiracies to an off-topic group! I >>>> thought all the 911 kooktards died of terminal stupidity years ago. >>> >>> Oh bullshit because you didn't think or you would know there were a lot >>> of >>> inconsistencies in the bullshit your Television told you about 9/11. >>> >>> -------- OP Below -------------------- >>> >>> 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 >>> >>> And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was >>> the >>> crash dynamics. >>> >>> All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing >>> debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down on >>> impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to >>> get >>> you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were real. >> >> A crashing airplane does not slow down instantly and there are thousands >> of eyewitnesses to the planes hitting the buildings. > > Oh yes, because they were watching the CGIs on your Lord and Master the > Television Set or they heard a few of the Crisis Actors speak. DUH. Nope, lunatic boi, they were standing in the streets watching the airplanes hit. After the first airplane hit, the streets were filled with far more people watching the second airplane hit. You are just a raving lunatic that can't even get word capitalizaton correct nor understand this has nothing to do with astronomy. <snip lunatic ravings> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 16:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) |
| Message-ID | <do6dnalcwMOT-1fInZ2dnUU7-R2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #272274 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:1b3q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:40tp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>> news:mqbc08$bvc$3@pcls7.std.com... >>>>> Oh, look. A kooktard posting WTC conspiracies to an off-topic group! >>>>> I >>>>> thought all the 911 kooktards died of terminal stupidity years ago. >>>> >>>> Oh bullshit because you didn't think or you would know there were a lot >>>> of >>>> inconsistencies in the bullshit your Television told you about 9/11. >>>> >>>> -------- OP Below -------------------- >>>> >>>> 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 >>>> >>>> And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was >>>> the >>>> crash dynamics. >>>> >>>> All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing >>>> debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down >>>> on >>>> impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to >>>> get >>>> you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were >>>> real. >>> >>> A crashing airplane does not slow down instantly and there are thousands >>> of eyewitnesses to the planes hitting the buildings. >> >> Oh yes, because they were watching the CGIs on your Lord and Master the >> Television Set or they heard a few of the Crisis Actors speak. DUH. > > Nope, lunatic boi, they were standing in the streets watching the > airplanes hit. You mean the "Crisis Actors" were paid to stand in the street and then recite their script when asked questions. DUH. There are so many inconsistancies with the Great 9/11 hoax how can you fall for any of the crap that your beloved Television threw in your face? > After the first airplane hit, the streets were filled with far more > people watching the second airplane hit. And yet we were only given the scripts from the paid Crisis Actors or those that fell for the bullshit from the paid Crisis Actors. BTW the CGIs on your beloved Television Set still prove they are CGIs by their crash dynamics and the item needed to synchronize the bogus CGIs with the real world is still in those videos. <G> Oh and not only do the crash dynamics give the CGIs away but so does the disappearing wing of the alleged Flight 175 because that can only be recreated with 3D software. <G> > You are just a raving lunatic that can't even get word capitalizaton > correct nor understand this has nothing to do with astronomy. Oh boy, I have never seen anybody try so hard to defend their beloved Television Set before. > <snip lunatic ravings> Clearly you have a love affair with your beloved Television set and you think it will only give you the truth. So how many other prime time movies have you fallen for? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 22:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake (#1 the planes were CGIs) |
| Message-ID | <up9q9c-hr2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #272279 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:1b3q9c-g52.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:40tp9c-va1.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mqbc08$bvc$3@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>> Oh, look. A kooktard posting WTC conspiracies to an off-topic group! >>>>>> I >>>>>> thought all the 911 kooktards died of terminal stupidity years ago. >>>>> >>>>> Oh bullshit because you didn't think or you would know there were a lot >>>>> of >>>>> inconsistencies in the bullshit your Television told you about 9/11. >>>>> >>>>> -------- OP Below -------------------- >>>>> >>>>> 9/11 - Ten reasons why the hijackers were fake >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEk81AL5qg0 >>>>> >>>>> And my top reason that the story of the alleged hijackers was bogus was >>>>> the >>>>> crash dynamics. >>>>> >>>>> All four jets were not consistent with real crashes because of missing >>>>> debris as in the case of Flights 77 and 93 or the lack of a slow down >>>>> on >>>>> impact with Flights 11 or 175 which means Crisis Actors were needed to >>>>> get >>>>> you to believe that the CGIs that rammed into the Twin Towers were >>>>> real. >>>> >>>> A crashing airplane does not slow down instantly and there are thousands >>>> of eyewitnesses to the planes hitting the buildings. >>> >>> Oh yes, because they were watching the CGIs on your Lord and Master the >>> Television Set or they heard a few of the Crisis Actors speak. DUH. >> >> Nope, lunatic boi, they were standing in the streets watching the >> airplanes hit. > > You mean the "Crisis Actors" were paid to stand in the street and then > recite their script when asked questions. DUH. What are "Crisis Actors" and why is it capitalized, kook? > There are so many inconsistancies with the Great 9/11 hoax how can you fall > for any of the crap that your beloved Television threw in your face? Why is Television capitalized, kook? <snip remaining insane babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web