Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #273620 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-24 08:38 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-24 10:56 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 131 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:38 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:54 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:15 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:23 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:37 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:43 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:57 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:51 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:12 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:34 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:53 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:55 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:52 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 15:30 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 09:59 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:36 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 15:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:50 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 15:50 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:21 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:46 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:46 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:24 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:55 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:22 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:11 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:35 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 17:10 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:13 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 17:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:02 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:32 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:30 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 17:27 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:55 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:33 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:19 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:28 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:25 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:24 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:00 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:28 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:34 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:27 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-27 20:23 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:29 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-27 21:50 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:02 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:25 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (iimp is a complete idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:49 -0500
Re: Rocky is still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a complete idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 22:45 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 08:29 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (K proves she is an asshole) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 09:12 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (K proves she is an asshole) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 10:09 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:09 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:06 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:11 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:41 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 22:01 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 16:13 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:32 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:12 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:51 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 16:41 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:54 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:58 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:12 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:25 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:52 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:33 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:28 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 11:08 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:53 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:34 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:50 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:31 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:25 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:30 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:24 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 12:39 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:42 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 10:19 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:51 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:49 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-26 22:03 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 17:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 22:03 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 18:30 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:26 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 23:20 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:27 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:26 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:20 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 09:40 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:55 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 11:01 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:50 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:38 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:48 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:58 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:07 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:59 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:40 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 00:27 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:50 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:31 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:49 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:07 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 10:00 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:11 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:47 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-24 10:23 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:12 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-24 13:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:17 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:44 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:56 -0500
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 08:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <AcydncYwtOyqWUDInZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #273884 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mrk4jp$o5s$1@dont-email.me... > > > Since you deleted the link I provided in my last response > (why would you do that ?) > I'll post it again. > > The video below goes into that and even asks why the collapse of WTC 7 > made > no ground shaking at all. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Qkv3bAFy7s Thanks for the video. Yes, I read part of that in her book and I'm glad it made it to a video. Neither Tower crashed to the ground. I like to say most of them floated away before they could get to the ground. Too bad Judy didn't say anything about the ground shaking 12 seconds before the North Tower was vaporized because the USGS lost that data for some reason. As for WTC7 the pile of debris was small for a 47 story building so something vaporized the rest of it along with part of Fiterman Hall. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 17:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7p91bc-7ci.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #273901 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: <snip kook babble> > Neither Tower crashed to the ground. I like to say most of them floated > away before they could get to the ground. The building collapes were recorded by nearby seismographs, kook. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 22:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrm0j0$rko$4@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #273901 |
On 8/26/2015 8:50 AM, Rocky wrote: > > Neither Tower crashed to the ground. LIES. I like to say most of them floated > away before they could get to the ground. LIES > > Too bad Judy didn't say anything about the ground shaking 12 seconds before > the North Tower was vaporized because the USGS lost that data for some > reason. LIES > > As for WTC7 the pile of debris was small for a 47 story building so > something vaporized the rest of it along with part of Fiterman Hall. LIES > > Rocky > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 04:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <brltta1ghinp9sd3cudbg9giu92o5msbnj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #273901 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:50:11 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
>news:mrk4jp$o5s$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>>
>> Since you deleted the link I provided in my last response
>> (why would you do that ?)
>> I'll post it again.
>>
>> The video below goes into that and even asks why the collapse of WTC 7
>> made no ground shaking at all.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Qkv3bAFy7s
>
>Thanks for the video. Yes, I read part of that in her book and I'm glad it
>made it to a video.
>
>Neither Tower crashed to the ground. I like to say most of them floated
>away before they could get to the ground.
>
100% of the evidence shows they collapsed. This includes all of
evidence you've offered.
>Too bad Judy didn't say anything about the ground shaking 12 seconds before
>the North Tower was vaporized because the USGS lost that data for some
>reason.
So your claim can't be verified. Isn't that convenient?
>
>As for WTC7 the pile of debris was small for a 47 story building so
>something vaporized the rest of it along with part of Fiterman Hall.
It wasn't small to the educated mind.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 17:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jm91bc-7ci.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #273884 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > Since you deleted the link I provided in my last response > (why would you do that ?) Because it is just kook babble. > I'll post it again. > > The video below goes into that and even asks why the collapse of WTC 7 made > no ground shaking at all. The building collapes were recorded by nearby seismographs, kook. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 04:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <aqlttathmhcu7mildtiidt5effg9v6kojm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #273884 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:34:02 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> What you should be looking at is why seismic events on 9/11 did not
>>> match anything else.
>>
>> Such as what, exactly?
>>
>> Seismic recordings near, i.e. on the Eastern Seaboard, show background
>> noise and the very slight distrubances of the building collapes and
>> the airplane crashes as would be expected by anyone with half a brain.
>>
>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
>> signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.
>>
>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
>> seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
>> as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
>> by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
>> Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.
>>
>> A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
>> fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.
>>
>> Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
>> has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.
>>
>> Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
>> on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.
>>
>> Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
>> governmental agency.
>>
>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
>>
>> http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
>> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html
>>
>> <snip remaining kook babble>
>
>
>
>Since you deleted the link I provided in my last response
>(why would you do that ?)
>I'll post it again.
>
>The video below goes into that and even asks why the collapse of WTC 7 made
>no ground shaking at all.
>
To say it made none is wrong, of course. But Troofers don't care
about what is right or wrong.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Qkv3bAFy7s
>
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 12:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mri982$c1u$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #273775 |
> > The buildings didn't fall,....they turned to dust. wrong. they fell, guess you missed that. But why do you believe they turned to dust ? you believe in the "magic dust ray" ? > Now ask yourself why buildings like that would turn to dust. no, you ask yourself that. > > ....And then the possibility of a small nuke (or several) , starts making a > lot of sense. no they dont, radiation is too big a problem. a nuke would close at least the lower 1/2 of Manhattan for 200 years. Got That ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 06:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrk530$pop$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #273801 |
gilber34 wrote: >> The buildings didn't fall,....they turned to dust. > > wrong. they fell, guess you missed that. But why do you believe they > turned to dust ? you believe in the "magic dust ray" ? > > >> Now ask yourself why buildings like that would turn to dust. > > no, you ask yourself that. > >> >> ....And then the possibility of a small nuke (or several) , starts >> making a lot of sense. > > no they dont, radiation is too big a problem. > > a nuke would close at least the lower 1/2 of Manhattan for 200 years. > > Got That ? Radiation is not a problem for the feds. They just raise the "safe" limit, anytime it saves them from having to do something. Look at how they did it after Chrernobyl, and again after Fukishima. Now you can eat fish that almost glow in the dark, and all it took was a stroke of a pen to make it perfectly safe.. You still believe they are looking after your best interests, and saving you from the boogie-men, right ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 10:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vfidnVBDx_BoG0HInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #273768 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >> >> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else saw >> it. > > Everybody else did not see it. T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near it. DUH And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard about the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: Nuclear destruction of the WTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 20:51 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrigrv$stl$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #273777 |
On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>> >>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else saw >>> it. >> >> Everybody else did not see it. > > T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that didn't know > what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near it. DUH So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know nothing about molten metal, what a quiant idea. > > And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard about the > molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: > So these two people did not see the metal. > Nuclear destruction of the WTC > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y > > Rocky sheeple > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 06:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrk5gi$r7r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #273822 |
Tony Dragon wrote: > On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>> >>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else >>>> saw it. >>> >>> Everybody else did not see it. >> >> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near it. DUH > > So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) > So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know nothing > about molten metal, what a quiant idea. > >> >> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard about >> the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >> > So these two people did not see the metal. > >> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >> >> Rocky sheeple >> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? Go to the 23 second mark to save time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 22:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrl9f3$9hj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #273886 |
On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: > Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>> >>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else >>>>> saw it. >>>> >>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>> >>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near it. DUH >> >> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know nothing >> about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >> >>> >>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard about >>> the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>> >> So these two people did not see the metal. >> >>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>> >>> Rocky sheeple >>> > > > > > > The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. > Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? > > Go to the 23 second mark to save time > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE > > That does not appear to be what that video said. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 17:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrt8qv$nn4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #273964 |
Tony Dragon wrote: > On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: >> Tony Dragon wrote: >>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>> >>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone >>>>>> else saw it. >>>>> >>>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>>> >>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near >>>> it. DUH >>> >>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know >>> nothing about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >>> >>>> >>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard >>>> about the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>>> >>> So these two people did not see the metal. >>> >>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>>> >>>> Rocky sheeple >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. >> Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? >> >> Go to the 23 second mark to save time >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE >> >> > > That does not appear to be what that video said. > He says it clear as day. Try rewatching the video, and this time pay attention. Although I can find you plenty of times he refers directly to the molten metal in the first few weeks after 9/11. Later on he was told to keep his mouth shut Just google "giuliani talks about molten metal" I get pages of returns. https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=OybiVYzQAoON8QeRtpLoDw&gws_rd=ssl#q=giuliani+talks+about+molten+metal Pick whichever link you like.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 22:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bqm9bc-67h.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #274310 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: >>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone >>>>>>> else saw it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>>>> >>>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near >>>>> it. DUH >>>> >>>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >>>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know >>>> nothing about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard >>>>> about the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>>>> >>>> So these two people did not see the metal. >>>> >>>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>>>> >>>>> Rocky sheeple >>>>> >>> >>> >>> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. >>> Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? >>> >>> Go to the 23 second mark to save time >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE >>> >>> >> >> That does not appear to be what that video said. >> > > He says it clear as day. > Try rewatching the video, and this time pay attention. > > Although I can find you plenty of times he refers directly to the molten > metal in the first few weeks after 9/11. > Later on he was told to keep his mouth shut > > Just google "giuliani talks about molten metal" > > I get pages of returns. > > https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=OybiVYzQAoON8QeRtpLoDw&gws_rd=ssl#q=giuliani+talks+about+molten+metal > > Pick whichever link you like. Yeah, like a lawyer knows about metallurgy. The presense or absense of any molten metal is irrelevant. I've melted steel with BBQ brickets and a vaccum cleaner set to blow; melting steel is not all that difficult to do. This is just another kooktard red herring. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 18:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) |
| Message-ID | <h7ednT4eW9Er3X_InZ2dnUU7-IGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #274311 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:bqm9bc-67h.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Tony Dragon wrote: >>> On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: >>>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone >>>>>>>> else saw it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>>>>> >>>>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>>>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near >>>>>> it. DUH >>>>> >>>>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >>>>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know >>>>> nothing about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard >>>>>> about the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>>>>> >>>>> So these two people did not see the metal. >>>>> >>>>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky sheeple >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. >>>> Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? >>>> >>>> Go to the 23 second mark to save time >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE >>>> >>>> >>> >>> That does not appear to be what that video said. >>> >> >> He says it clear as day. >> Try rewatching the video, and this time pay attention. >> >> Although I can find you plenty of times he refers directly to the molten >> metal in the first few weeks after 9/11. >> Later on he was told to keep his mouth shut >> >> Just google "giuliani talks about molten metal" >> >> I get pages of returns. >> >> https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=OybiVYzQAoON8QeRtpLoDw&gws_rd=ssl#q=giuliani+talks+about+molten+metal >> >> Pick whichever link you like. > > Yeah, like a lawyer knows about metallurgy. > > The presense or absense of any molten metal is irrelevant. ROTFLMAO because what they originally placed on the molten metal is further evidence that the Twin Towers were nuked. See 6:00 - 6:21 of the following video: 9 11 Depleted uranium, Radiation Exposure, World Trade Center PATH Bathtub, Yellow Trucks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JcLWkTpyRc And I have another photo that shows the M291 resin was used to cover the area where the north end of WTC3 used to stand which happens to be exactly where a deep underground nuke would have to be placed to do the damage it did to the North Tower. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > I've melted steel with BBQ brickets and a vaccum cleaner set to blow; > melting > steel is not all that difficult to do. That stayed hot for months? I doubt that. > This is just another kooktard red herring. You are just too funny because what you are trying you best to deny is really more supporting evidence that Ground Zero was called Ground Zero for the pre-9/11 definition of Ground Zero meaning it was nuked, nuked and nuked. <G> And talking about NIST, here is the guy that told NIST why the Twin Towers collapsed and who the fcuk is he other than another paid Crisis Actor? See 9/11 Eyewitness - FOX Freelancer Harley Guy Mark Walsh https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5y8PtfKA14 And dig this about "What is your role right here right now?" 3:27-3_28 in the following. WTF type of question is that? Then he answers with "can't say what role I'm going to play right now." So FOX news was just looking for more crisis actors in the following clip. "Freelancer" Mark Walsh B.S Story For Fake FOX News on 911 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbizU1msKQg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 01:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) |
| Message-ID | <qm2abc-bei.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #274314 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ROTFLMAO because what they originally placed on the molten metal is further > evidence that the Twin Towers were nuked. See 6:00 - 6:21 of the following > video: Whether or not there was molten metal is a red herring and irrelevant kook babble> There were no nukes, you babbling lunatic. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Be sure to follow all the links in the above links. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 23:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrtb3l$3u6$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #274310 |
On 29/08/2015 22:41, Bast wrote: > Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: >>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone >>>>>>> else saw it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>>>> >>>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near >>>>> it. DUH >>>> >>>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >>>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know >>>> nothing about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard >>>>> about the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>>>> >>>> So these two people did not see the metal. >>>> >>>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>>>> >>>>> Rocky sheeple >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. >>> Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? >>> >>> Go to the 23 second mark to save time >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE >>> >>> >> >> That does not appear to be what that video said. >> > > > > > > He says it clear as day. > Try rewatching the video, and this time pay attention. > > Although I can find you plenty of times he refers directly to the molten > metal in the first few weeks after 9/11. > Later on he was told to keep his mouth shut > > Just google "giuliani talks about molten metal" > > I get pages of returns. > > https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=OybiVYzQAoON8QeRtpLoDw&gws_rd=ssl#q=giuliani+talks+about+molten+metal > > Pick whichever link you like. > > Nope still missed it, give me the time stamp & the words he used. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 18:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <M9WdnbM_SpU_3n_InZ2dnUU7-e-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #274310 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mrt8qv$nn4$1@dont-email.me... > > > Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: >>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone >>>>>>> else saw it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>>>> >>>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near >>>>> it. DUH >>>> >>>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >>>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know >>>> nothing about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard >>>>> about the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>>>> >>>> So these two people did not see the metal. >>>> >>>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>>>> >>>>> Rocky sheeple >>> >>> >>> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. >>> Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? >>> >>> Go to the 23 second mark to save time >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE >>> >>> >> >> That does not appear to be what that video said. >> > > He says it clear as day. > Try rewatching the video, and this time pay attention. > > Although I can find you plenty of times he refers directly to the molten > metal in the first few weeks after 9/11. > Later on he was told to keep his mouth shut > > Just google "giuliani talks about molten metal" > > I get pages of returns. > > https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=OybiVYzQAoON8QeRtpLoDw&gws_rd=ssl#q=giuliani+talks+about+molten+metal > > Pick whichever link you like. Thanks and I learned a lot from that link but when I saw the following video I heard Steven Jones say there was molten metal at "all three buildings" but I wish he had been more precise because I saw someone point to a spot of the molten metal and he pointed to the north end of WTC3 and not one of the towers. Scientists Examine the Molten Steel that Lingered for Weeks Underneath WTC 1, 2 & 7 on 9/11 - Many Surprises Found https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY The exact location of the pools of molten metal is very important because if it really was under WTC3, WTC4 and WTC7 then it helps prove that nukes finished of the Twin Towers by supporting the location where the deep underground nukes had to be placed to do the damage they did. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 01:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lp2abc-bei.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #274316 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Thanks and I learned a lot from that link but when I saw the following video > I heard Steven Jones say there was molten metal at "all three buildings" but > I wish he had been more precise because I saw someone point to a spot of the > molten metal and he pointed to the north end of WTC3 and not one of the > towers. Babbling about molten metal is a red herring and irrelevant, you delusional kook. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 04:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lslttahrultoij2un867n5b1p26h7hub60@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #273886 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:49:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>Tony Dragon wrote:
>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else
>>>>> saw it.
>>>>
>>>> Everybody else did not see it.
>>>
>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that
>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near it. DUH
>>
>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again)
>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know nothing
>> about molten metal, what a quiant idea.
>>
>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard about
>>> the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you:
>>>
>> So these two people did not see the metal.
>>
>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y
>>>
>>> Rocky sheeple
>
>
>
>The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times.
>Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ???
>
>Go to the 23 second mark to save time
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE
>
Mayor Giuliani made no comment about molten metal. He did state:
"There were fires of 2000 degrees Fahrenheit below the ground."
If you're going to lie, and you are, do not include the PROOF
that you've lied in your posts, stupid.
What, exactly, did you hope to gain by lying about what the Mayor
said? Serious question.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web