Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #276647 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-22 17:45 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-27 11:38 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 134 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 17:45 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-22 23:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 07:47 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:54 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 12:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 14:13 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 13:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 15:18 -0400
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> Admits he posts lies and False Videos. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 18:11 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 15:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 17:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 19:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-23 21:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-23 22:51 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-24 09:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 09:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:19 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 17:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 10:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 17:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 20:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 08:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-25 15:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 16:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 17:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-26 11:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-26 16:42 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 05:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 21:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 06:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-26 16:41 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 20:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 13:42 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 11:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-25 10:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-26 11:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-26 13:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-26 18:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-26 23:22 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-26 20:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:50 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 01:38 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 05:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 17:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 10:36 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-27 17:15 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 19:27 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 22:29 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 12:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-28 19:58 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 06:30 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 17:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 17:33 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 19:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 11:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-03 15:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 17:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-04 23:02 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 11:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-05 18:08 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 12:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:20 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-07 09:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 07:43 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 08:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 10:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 18:42 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 03:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 18:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 21:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-28 13:32 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 14:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-28 14:18 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 17:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 16:07 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 17:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 17:54 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 09:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:32 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 17:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-26 20:51 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 07:54 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 08:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 10:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:40 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 10:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:48 -0400
Re: Rocky's latest obsession jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 18:03 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-28 12:15 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 14:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-28 14:15 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 16:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 18:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:49 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-27 14:13 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 10:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-27 17:17 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-28 19:58 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 06:30 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-28 13:37 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 09:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-29 12:55 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-28 17:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-29 12:55 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:01 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-29 15:25 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-28 12:17 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 20:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 08:05 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 09:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-27 13:49 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 18:17 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 21:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 09:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 12:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-24 17:26 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-24 17:21 -0700
Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 11:38 -0500
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 12:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2b747677-bc8d-43ff-a74c-9142995f4ac9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #276834 |
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 5:51:11 PM UTC-7, Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > > > > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> <SIGH> > >>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the > >>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. > >> dude the plane flew over pentagon to get approch details, we saw that, then if landed just prior to impact like landing on the tarmac but this was over 500 milies an hour and looked like a rocket, so fast. it penetrated into level 5 that is how fast it was going. u must be a tardo bast rocky kookoo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 14:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <wcWdnTMcvtR8BZTLnZ2dnUU7-QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #276964 |
"Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:2b747677-bc8d-43ff-a74c-9142995f4ac9@googlegroups.com... On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 5:51:11 PM UTC-7, Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > > > > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> <SIGH> > >>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the > >>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. > >> dude the plane flew over pentagon to get approch details, we saw that, then if landed just prior to impact like landing on the tarmac but this was over 500 milies an hour and looked like a rocket, so fast. it penetrated into level 5 that is how fast it was going. u must be a tardo bast rocky kookoo =================== WOW 500 miles an hour and yet it still had the time to fold it's wings back before impact so it could all fit inside the Pentagon engines and all. riiight. This is what should have happened: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 14:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5951cefa-3667-431e-ab3f-80aae8a2d0f2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #276967 |
On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 12:45:38 PM UTC-7, Rocky wrote: > "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:2b747677-bc8d-43ff-a74c-9142995f4ac9@googlegroups.com... > On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 5:51:11 PM UTC-7, Sarah Ehrett wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: > > >> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> > > >>> <SIGH> > > >>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the > > >>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. > > >> > dude the plane flew over pentagon to get approch details, we saw that, then > if landed just prior to impact like landing on the tarmac but this was over > 500 milies an hour and looked like a rocket, so fast. it penetrated into > level 5 that is how fast it was going. u must be a tardo bast rocky kookoo > > =================== > > WOW 500 miles an hour and yet it still had the time to fold it's wings back > before impact so it could all fit inside the Pentagon engines and all. > riiight. > > This is what should have happened: > > 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs > > Rocky as ALL not most, ALL other have said, you are a freaking moron. The Pentagon is reinforced concrete steel, with special thick steel built at an exorbitant coast and overly protective. and aluminum wings have no change you freaking dumb ass.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 16:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <t9WdndCTULf9KZTLnZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #276972 |
"Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:5951cefa-3667-431e-ab3f-80aae8a2d0f2@googlegroups.com... > On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 12:45:38 PM UTC-7, Rocky wrote: >> "Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:2b747677-bc8d-43ff-a74c-9142995f4ac9@googlegroups.com... >> On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 5:51:11 PM UTC-7, Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> > On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> > >> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> >> > >>> <SIGH> >> > >>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >> > >>> the >> > >>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >> > >> >> dude the plane flew over pentagon to get approch details, we saw that, >> then >> if landed just prior to impact like landing on the tarmac but this was >> over >> 500 milies an hour and looked like a rocket, so fast. it penetrated into >> level 5 that is how fast it was going. u must be a tardo bast rocky >> kookoo >> >> =================== >> >> WOW 500 miles an hour and yet it still had the time to fold it's wings >> back >> before impact so it could all fit inside the Pentagon engines and all. >> riiight. >> >> This is what should have happened: >> >> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs >> >> Rocky > > > > > as ALL not most, ALL other have said, you are a freaking moron. The > Pentagon is reinforced concrete steel, with special thick steel built at > an exorbitant coast and overly protective. and aluminum wings have no > change you freaking dumb ass. The official story is that the wings of a 757 folded back to so both the wings and the engines ended up inside the Pentagon. And then everything burned up with the exception of one small part and one small engine and hundreds of desk. Basically the official story about the Pentagon is such obvious bullshit I'm surprised there are still people that fell for it. But if anyone would fall for the BS about the Pentagon it would be you and Sarah and Kidd and the Ediot and Michael. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 18:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <61fj0bt4pul5f4ki08o04pdvr4a5it85cl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #276975 |
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:41:59 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >The official story is that the wings of a 757 folded back to so both the >wings and the engines ended up inside the Pentagon. Go ahead a cite from a reliable source, FBI, US Navy, S&R personnel on site, etc... that the 747 folded back the wings before it hit the Pentagon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-26 20:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hche0b95ocneohbvjskrd2de868dkd7f01@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #276825 |
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:55:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> <SIGH>
>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the
>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured.
>>
>> Yes I have.
>>
>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building
>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash.
>>
>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy
>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon.
>>
>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video:
>>
>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the
>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has
>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small
>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail
>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around
>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of
>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
>>
>>
>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ
>
>
>Lets see
>" there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the
>Pentagon. "
>
>
>Ya,.... I can work with that
>....NO PLANE
>
Crashed anywhere *near* the Pentagon. It crashed *into* the
Pentagon. This is what the reporter said.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 09:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3071bdf2d376f09398c2e5@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #276825 |
In article <mu77lk$5tt$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> <SIGH> > >> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the > >> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. > > > > Yes I have. > > > >> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building > >> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. > > > > Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy > > Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. > > > > The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: > > > > " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the > > Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has > > crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small > > enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail > > sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around > > which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of > > the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. > > > > > >> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once > >> > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > > > > > > Lets see > " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the > Pentagon. " > > > Ya,.... I can work with that > ....NO PLANE I can work with that too.. Bast = No mind. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 14:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #276825 |
Bast wrote: > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> <SIGH> >>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the >>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >> >> Yes I have. >> >>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >> >> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >> >> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >> >> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >> >> >>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ > > > > > > Lets see > " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the > Pentagon. " > > > Ya,.... I can work with that > ....NO PLANE There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find out where the fourth plane was. Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 10:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8eudnRQnO5x3lJXLnZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #276864 |
"jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... > Bast wrote: >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> <SIGH> >>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the >>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>> >>> Yes I have. >>> >>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>> >>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>> >>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>> >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>> >>> >>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >> >> >> >> >> >> Lets see >> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >> Pentagon. " >> >> >> Ya,.... I can work with that >> ....NO PLANE > > There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find > out where the fourth plane was. > > Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was needed to force them to land in Cleveland. They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two flights were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add fake planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-27 17:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mu94mv$buj$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #276867 |
On 27/09/2015 16:26, Rocky wrote: > "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message > news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >> Bast wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> <SIGH> >>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the >>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>> >>>> Yes I have. >>>> >>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>> >>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>> >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>> >>>> >>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Lets see >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>> Pentagon. " >>> >>> >>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>> ....NO PLANE >> >> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >> out where the fourth plane was. >> >> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? > > There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was > needed to force them to land in Cleveland. > > They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two flights > were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. > Your proof of this please, don't post a you tube, use your own words. > It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon > were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we > were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. > > And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add fake > planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are > identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 19:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <muc2h5$r9n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #276874 |
On 27/09/2015 17:17, Tony Dragon wrote: > On 27/09/2015 16:26, Rocky wrote: >> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >> news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >>> Bast wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>> the >>>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>> >>>>> Yes I have. >>>>> >>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>> >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Lets see >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. " >>>> >>>> >>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>> ....NO PLANE >>> >>> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >>> out where the fourth plane was. >>> >>> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? >> >> There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was >> needed to force them to land in Cleveland. >> >> They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two >> flights >> were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. >> > > Your proof of this please, don't post a you tube, use your own words. Still waiting for an answer. > >> It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon >> were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we >> were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. >> >> And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add >> fake >> planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are >> identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test >> >> Rocky >> >> > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > http://www.avast.com > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 06:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mud7i8$das$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #276960 |
On 28/09/2015 19:58, Tony Dragon wrote: > On 27/09/2015 17:17, Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 27/09/2015 16:26, Rocky wrote: >>> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >>> news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >>>> Bast wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes I have. >>>>>> >>>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>>> >>>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are >>>>>> small >>>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere >>>>>> around >>>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Lets see >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. " >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>>> ....NO PLANE >>>> >>>> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >>>> out where the fourth plane was. >>>> >>>> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? >>> >>> There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was >>> needed to force them to land in Cleveland. >>> >>> They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two >>> flights >>> were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. >>> >> >> Your proof of this please, don't post a you tube, use your own words. > > > Still waiting for an answer. No answer, as expected, Rocky running away again. > >> >>> It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon >>> were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we >>> were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. >>> >>> And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add >>> fake >>> planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are >>> identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> http://www.avast.com >> > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > http://www.avast.com > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 13:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM000520CF0724CE8B@aca42ed4.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #276867 |
Rocky wrote: > > "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message > news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >> Bast wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> <SIGH> >>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the >>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>> >>>> Yes I have. >>>> >>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>> >>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>> >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>> >>>> >>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Lets see >>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>> Pentagon. " >>> >>> >>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>> ....NO PLANE >> >> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >> out where the fourth plane was. >> >> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? > > There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was > needed to force them to land in Cleveland. How were they forced to land? There wasn't a scramble ordered. > > They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two flights > were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. > > It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon > were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we > were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. > > And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add fake > planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are > identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test So how do you explain the fact that I watched the second plane crash into the Tower on live TV? /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 09:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <FfadnQj2xdjCzZTLnZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #276939 |
"jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message news:PM000520CF0724CE8B@aca42ed4.ipt.aol.com... > Rocky wrote: >> >> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >> news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >>> Bast wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>> the >>>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>> >>>>> Yes I have. >>>>> >>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>> >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Lets see >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. " >>>> >>>> >>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>> ....NO PLANE >>> >>> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >>> out where the fourth plane was. >>> >>> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? >> >> There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was >> needed to force them to land in Cleveland. > > How were they forced to land? There wasn't a scramble ordered. Maybe the pilots were handed a note before they even took off that they would have to change their flght number in mid air and then land at Cleveland. >> They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two >> flights >> were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. >> >> It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon >> were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we >> were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. >> >> And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add >> fake >> planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are >> identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test > > > So how do you explain the fact that I watched the second plane crash into > the Tower on live TV? BULLSHIT you never saw a crash. All you saw was identical to a CGI flying into a building with no crash dynamics whatsoever. The CGIs never slowed down and never shed any parts either. And the parts they claimed to have found were planted just like parts were planted at both the Pentagon and Pranksville, PA. And talking about Pranksville, PA about all they found there was crap pointing to the framed patsies. For more information on how hundreds of videos were tainted see the following video. But I can tell you all they needed was a 3D layout of Nuke York City, a flight path for the CGI and a synchronization flash which was left in a lot of the falsified videos. 07 - The Key https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 12:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM000520E272CEE5F1@aca43578.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #276940 |
Rocky wrote: > > "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message > news:PM000520CF0724CE8B@aca42ed4.ipt.aol.com... >> Rocky wrote: >>> >>> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >>> news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >>>> Bast wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes I have. >>>>>> >>>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>>> >>>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Lets see >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. " >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>>> ....NO PLANE >>>> >>>> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >>>> out where the fourth plane was. >>>> >>>> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? >>> >>> There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was >>> needed to force them to land in Cleveland. >> >> How were they forced to land? There wasn't a scramble ordered. > > Maybe the pilots were handed a note before they even took off that they > would have to change their flght number in mid air and then land at > Cleveland. So now you are stating that the planes were not forced to land? ASSuming that those planes did land in Cleveland, where did the planes which crashed come from? > > >>> They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two >>> flights >>> were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. >>> >>> It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon >>> were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we >>> were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. >>> >>> And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add >>> fake >>> planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are >>> identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test >> >> >> So how do you explain the fact that I watched the second plane crash into >> the Tower on live TV? > > BULLSHIT you never saw a crash. All you saw was identical to a CGI flying > into a building with no crash dynamics whatsoever. The CGIs never slowed > down and never shed any parts either. And the parts they claimed to have > found were planted just like parts were planted at both the Pentagon and > Pranksville, PA. And talking about Pranksville, PA about all they found > there was crap pointing to the framed patsies. What is a CGI? > > For more information on how hundreds of videos were tainted see the > following video. But I can tell you all they needed was a 3D layout of Nuke > York City, a flight path for the CGI and a synchronization flash which was > left in a lot of the falsified videos. > > 07 - The Key > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds Do you know what kinds of cameras were being used? The footage I saw was shot by NBC's camera people. Hint: they were not digital. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-28 17:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dtaodc-0ca.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #276939 |
In sci.physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: > Rocky wrote: >> >> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >> news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >>> Bast wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the >>>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>> >>>>> Yes I have. >>>>> >>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>> >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Lets see >>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>> Pentagon. " >>>> >>>> >>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>> ....NO PLANE >>> >>> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >>> out where the fourth plane was. >>> >>> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? >> >> There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was >> needed to force them to land in Cleveland. > > How were they forced to land? There wasn't a scramble ordered. > >> >> They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two flights >> were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. >> >> It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon >> were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we >> were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. >> >> And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add fake >> planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are >> identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test > > > So how do you explain the fact that I watched the second plane crash into > the Tower on live TV? > > /BAH Be prepared to be told what you say on live TV were CGI's. Ignore the fact that in 2001 the state of the art was the movie Shrek which took dozens of programmers months to produce on cutting edge, parallel hardware. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 12:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM000520E27ED6AE3D@aca43578.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #276952 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >> Rocky wrote: >>> >>> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >>> news:PM000520BB649180A9@aca40c59.ipt.aol.com... >>>> Bast wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:23:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <SIGH> >>>>>>> Have you not seen the video of a CNN news reporter on the scene at the >>>>>>> Pentagon, literally minutes after the incident occured. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes I have. >>>>>> >>>>>>> He even clearly states that he was there BEFORE the building >>>>>>> collapsed, and there was no sign of a passenger jet airliner crash. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Watch the video again. The reporter is asked by Judy >>>>>> Woodruff if there is any evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Reporter's response, a direct quote from the video: >>>>>> >>>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>>> Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that has >>>>>> crashed in. As I said the only pieces left that you can see are small >>>>>> enough that you can pick up in your hand and there are no large tail >>>>>> sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around >>>>>> which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of >>>>>> the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report - NO PLANE - Only Aired Once >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Lets see >>>>> " there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the >>>>> Pentagon. " >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ya,.... I can work with that >>>>> ....NO PLANE >>>> >>>> There was a plane inside the Pentagon. People were also trying to find >>>> out where the fourth plane was. >>>> >>>> Do you really believe there were no hijackers on any of those planes? >>> >>> There were certainly Hijackers on Flights 93 and 175 because someone was >>> needed to force them to land in Cleveland. >> >> How were they forced to land? There wasn't a scramble ordered. >> >>> >>> They didn't need hijackers for Flights 11 and 77 because those two flights >>> were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. >>> >>> It was very easy to tell the stories of Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon >>> were total bullshit but it took a little more observation to see that we >>> were lied to about all 4 of the alleged hijacked jets. >>> >>> And don't forget the 9/11 hoaxsters have everything they needed to add fake >>> planes to thousands of videos and that because the crashes that are >>> identical to a crash of a CGI it passes the duck test. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test >> >> >> So how do you explain the fact that I watched the second plane crash into >> the Tower on live TV? >> >> /BAH > > Be prepared to be told what you say on live TV were CGI's. I didn't believe you, then read the next post. Is this a child who is so scared of the war we're in that s/he has to believe fictions of fanatics? > > Ignore the fact that in 2001 the state of the art was the movie > Shrek which took dozens of programmers months to produce on cutting > edge, parallel hardware. And terminals were still TV cathode ray tubes which weighed 50+ pounds. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 17:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cosqdc-ori.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #277012 |
In sci.physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >>> So how do you explain the fact that I watched the second plane crash into >>> the Tower on live TV? >>> >>> /BAH >> >> Be prepared to be told what you say on live TV were CGI's. > > I didn't believe you, then read the next post. Is this a child who > is so scared of the war we're in that s/he has to believe fictions > of fanatics? Nope; he's a forty something, delusional, and not very bright nut job that can't hold a job and is a known stalker. He really is as insane as he sounds. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 15:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3074afd0ba111e4498c2f5@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #277019 |
In article <cosqdc-ori.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: > > >>> So how do you explain the fact that I watched the second plane crash into > >>> the Tower on live TV? > >>> > >>> /BAH > >> > >> Be prepared to be told what you say on live TV were CGI's. > > > > I didn't believe you, then read the next post. Is this a child who > > is so scared of the war we're in that s/he has to believe fictions > > of fanatics? > > Nope; he's a forty something, delusional, and not very bright nut job > that can't hold a job and is a known stalker. > > He really is as insane as he sounds. Bast and Rocky's hero: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5ra0Vjq5DA -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 04:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kdan0b5af9t2crkp05c07hrvg47bnqno2q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #277019 |
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:01:32 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> In sci.physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>>> So how do you explain the fact that I watched the second plane crash into
>>>> the Tower on live TV?
>>>>
>>>> /BAH
>>>
>>> Be prepared to be told what you say on live TV were CGI's.
>>
>> I didn't believe you, then read the next post. Is this a child who
>> is so scared of the war we're in that s/he has to believe fictions
>> of fanatics?
>
>Nope; he's a forty something, delusional, and not very bright nut job
>that can't hold a job and is a known stalker.
>
>He really is as insane as he sounds.
He's in his 60s. Beyond that, you're 100% correct.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web