Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #279113 > unrolled thread

Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO

Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy

Contents

  Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-15 21:31 -0600
    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-16 08:07 +0100
      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 04:50 -0600
        Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-16 08:29 -0700
        Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 10:01 -0800
          Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 14:10 -0800
            Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 17:02 -0600
              Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-16 20:48 -0500
                Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 09:46 -0600
                  Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 15:38 -0600
                    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-18 07:36 -0800
                      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 04:12 -0600
                        Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 08:38 -0600
                          Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-20 18:22 +0000
                            Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 15:43 -0600
                              Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-21 09:53 +0000
        Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 09:26 -0600
          Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-17 21:17 +0100
            Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 15:20 -0600
              Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-21 06:11 +0100
    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 09:35 -0600
      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 16:41 -0600
    Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 11:52 -0800
      Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 14:09 -0600

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#279113 — Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO

Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO
 https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/ 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#279116

Am 16.11.2015 04:31, schrieb Rocky:
> Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO
>   https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/
>
I just have found the website of Dimitri Khalezov:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/nuclear-demolition-of-the-world-trade-center-damage-to-bathtub/

Quote:
"The most spiteful of these critics were supposed “followers of Judy 
Wood’s theory” – the so-called conspiracy theory No.5 (or “DEW” theory) 
which we have already disproved in the corresponding Chapter of this 
book. Actually, these folks from “Judy Wood creed” bear striking 
similarities to a typical cult, but in reality it seems they are just a 
well-organized group of shills who pretend to behave as if it were a 
indeed a “cult”. These folks attempted to “debunk” my “theory” (thus, 
clearly ignoring my statement that I am not a “theorist” but a “witness” 
and therefore my supposed “theory” is not actually a “theory” and 
therefore can not be treated as such) by claiming that I allegedly could 
not explain why “my” “alleged” “underground nuclear explosions” did not 
damage the so-called “bathtub” and why they did not damage PATH (the 
underground train system).

These shills from the little army headed by Judy Wood pretended not to 
notice the definition of “ground zero” in pre-9/11 English language, 
they preferred not to notice high temperatures that unexplainably 
persisted underground for almost 4 months, and they preferred not to 
notice leukemia and other radiation-related cancers strangely endemic 
among the ground zero responders.

They continue to stubbornly insist that the WTC was demolished by 
mysterious “laser beams from space”, which, in their opinions, should 
successfully explain both – “dustifications” of the Towers and the 
underground fires (along with “ground zero” name). Moreover, they claim 
that I was allegedly hired by the U.S. Government to “dissolve” their 
alleged “truth” (supposedly provided by Judy Wood) with a certain 
“plausible lie” – because, they claimed, I could not satisfactorily 
explain why “my” underground nukes did not damage the “bathtub” and PATH 
trains and stations."

As I feel kind of personally addressed, I would like to say:

- I personally think, that Judy Woods assumptions are correct

- I have or had no contact whatsoever to her by any kind of means.

So, I reject the claim, she has followers, that act like a cult.

Actually I had physics as kind of hobby and found something fitting. So 
I heard of Tom Bearden and John Hutchison long ago, but not in 
connection to 9/11.

I reject the idea of explosion by any kind of bomb, because of the 
missing material and the restriction of the demolition to the area above 
the surface level.

Also the phenomenon of those round holes, that go right through entire 
buildings, that would not fit to any kind of bombs.

Such holes are present in WTC 4 and WTC 6. These holes contain almost no 
material, while in the remaining build you can still see office chairs 
and coffee machines.

So: whatever made the destruction is apparently capable of turning steel 
and concrete into nothing.

How these devices operate is not well understood. But sooner or later 
this will change, since all kinds of idiots will like to have such a thing.

This again shows the enormous stupidity of the entire event, since it is 
kind of advertise for something, people would not have found for centuries.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279117

"Thomas Heger" <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in message 
news:datdm4F8gfoU1@mid.individual.net...
> Am 16.11.2015 04:31, schrieb Rocky:
>> Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO
>>   https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/
>>
> I just have found the website of Dimitri Khalezov:
>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/nuclear-demolition-of-the-world-trade-center-damage-to-bathtub/
>
> Quote:
> "The most spiteful of these critics were supposed "followers of Judy Wood's 
> theory" - the so-called conspiracy theory No.5 (or "DEW" theory) which we 
> have already disproved in the corresponding Chapter of this book. 
> Actually, these folks from "Judy Wood creed" bear striking similarities to 
> a typical cult, but in reality it seems they are just a well-organized 
> group of shills who pretend to behave as if it were a indeed a "cult". 
> These folks attempted to "debunk" my "theory" (thus, clearly ignoring my 
> statement that I am not a "theorist" but a "witness" and therefore my 
> supposed "theory" is not actually a "theory" and therefore can not be 
> treated as such) by claiming that I allegedly could not explain why "my" 
> "alleged" "underground nuclear explosions" did not damage the so-called 
> "bathtub" and why they did not damage PATH (the underground train system).
>
> These shills from the little army headed by Judy Wood pretended not to 
> notice the definition of "ground zero" in pre-9/11 English language, they 
> preferred not to notice high temperatures that unexplainably persisted 
> underground for almost 4 months, and they preferred not to notice leukemia 
> and other radiation-related cancers strangely endemic among the ground 
> zero responders.
>
> They continue to stubbornly insist that the WTC was demolished by 
> mysterious "laser beams from space", which, in their opinions, should 
> successfully explain both - "dustifications" of the Towers and the 
> underground fires (along with "ground zero" name). Moreover, they claim 
> that I was allegedly hired by the U.S. Government to "dissolve" their 
> alleged "truth" (supposedly provided by Judy Wood) with a certain 
> "plausible lie" - because, they claimed, I could not satisfactorily 
> explain why "my" underground nukes did not damage the "bathtub" and PATH 
> trains and stations."
>
> As I feel kind of personally addressed, I would like to say:
>
> - I personally think, that Judy Woods assumptions are correct
>
> - I have or had no contact whatsoever to her by any kind of means.
>
> So, I reject the claim, she has followers, that act like a cult.
>
> Actually I had physics as kind of hobby and found something fitting. So I 
> heard of Tom Bearden and John Hutchison long ago, but not in connection to 
> 9/11.
>
> I reject the idea of explosion by any kind of bomb, because of the missing 
> material and the restriction of the demolition to the area above the 
> surface level.

The missing material was just material vaporized to ultra fine and once the 
material was that small it floated away in tremendous clouds of debris.  And 
nukes can do that but more specifically MRR nukes can do that and leave less 
of a trail then American made nukes would leave.

The restriction of the demolition was really a restriction on what you were 
allowed to see of the demolition.  The places were molten metal was found 
were poorly documented and about all I'd seen is someone point to a location 
in a video and most people state where they think the molten metal was in 
the basements of the Twin Towers but it is more likely that the literal "hot 
spots" were off to the side of the Twin Towers.  And those "hot spots" would 
be closer to the side of the Twin Towers furthest from the multi-floor 
"Surviving Corners."
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

> Also the phenomenon of those round holes, that go right through entire 
> buildings, that would not fit to any kind of bombs.

There was an assortment of different things used at the World Trade Center 
besides the three MRR nukes that did the most damage to the World Trade 
Center.


> Such holes are present in WTC 4 and WTC 6. These holes contain almost no 
> material, while in the remaining build you can still see office chairs and 
> coffee machines.

I do not know what you are talking about with WTC4 but I've seen the damage 
done to WTC6 explained by the use of nukes with a nearly vertical blast like 
the nukes that were used in the OKC bombing.  And yes the OKC bombing was 
nuclear too but our government tried their best to blame it on a single 
point bomb that does not explain why the damage done to the Alfred P. Murrah 
building was consistent with the damage done to WTC6.

Oh, and we can't forget all the toasted cars at GZ.  Those were just a 
distraction just like the downed light poles at the Pentagon.  BTW if the 
light poles at the Pentagon were really hit by a jet there would have been 
jet fuel all over the lawn of the Pentagon.


> So: whatever made the destruction is apparently capable of turning steel 
> and concrete into nothing.

MRR nukes can do that and those also explain why GZ was off limits to 
everybody for 2 full days and then why radiation was monitored for days 
after that.  BTW they told people the badges they had to wear were to 
monitor air quality but if that were true they wouldn't have let anybody 
work at GZ since they would have known the EPA lied about the air quality 
right then and there but they were too involved in their own lies about the 
badges at that time to notice that the EPA lied about the air quality.

> How these devices operate is not well understood. But sooner or later this 
> will change, since all kinds of idiots will like to have such a thing.

The holes left by the MRR nukes that correspond to where people found molten 
metal are the biggest give away what really destroyed the Twin Towers but 
try to find documentation of what really happened with GZ after it was used 
to put on a show for the public.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

> This again shows the enormous stupidity of the entire event, since it is 
> kind of advertise for something, people would not have found for 
> centuries.

Others have already pointed out that the heavily damaged areas help prove 
MRR nukes were used especially when you couple that with where the molten 
metal was found.  BTW from what I've seen and heard the molten metal was 
found at the three spots where the haze is coming from in the following 
photo:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

> TH

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279123

LOOK AT THIS SHIT!

YOU PROVE NOTHING EXCEPT WHAT AN IDIOT YOU ARE, ROCKSHIT!

NOTHING IMPRESSIVE THERE AT ALL!

FUCK OFF!

Saul Levy


On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 04:50:19 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Thomas Heger" <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in message 
>news:datdm4F8gfoU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Am 16.11.2015 04:31, schrieb Rocky:
>>> Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO
>>>   https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/
>>>
>> I just have found the website of Dimitri Khalezov:
>>
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/nuclear-demolition-of-the-world-trade-center-damage-to-bathtub/
>>
>> Quote:
>> "The most spiteful of these critics were supposed "followers of Judy Wood's 
>> theory" - the so-called conspiracy theory No.5 (or "DEW" theory) which we 
>> have already disproved in the corresponding Chapter of this book. 
>> Actually, these folks from "Judy Wood creed" bear striking similarities to 
>> a typical cult, but in reality it seems they are just a well-organized 
>> group of shills who pretend to behave as if it were a indeed a "cult". 
>> These folks attempted to "debunk" my "theory" (thus, clearly ignoring my 
>> statement that I am not a "theorist" but a "witness" and therefore my 
>> supposed "theory" is not actually a "theory" and therefore can not be 
>> treated as such) by claiming that I allegedly could not explain why "my" 
>> "alleged" "underground nuclear explosions" did not damage the so-called 
>> "bathtub" and why they did not damage PATH (the underground train system).
>>
>> These shills from the little army headed by Judy Wood pretended not to 
>> notice the definition of "ground zero" in pre-9/11 English language, they 
>> preferred not to notice high temperatures that unexplainably persisted 
>> underground for almost 4 months, and they preferred not to notice leukemia 
>> and other radiation-related cancers strangely endemic among the ground 
>> zero responders.
>>
>> They continue to stubbornly insist that the WTC was demolished by 
>> mysterious "laser beams from space", which, in their opinions, should 
>> successfully explain both - "dustifications" of the Towers and the 
>> underground fires (along with "ground zero" name). Moreover, they claim 
>> that I was allegedly hired by the U.S. Government to "dissolve" their 
>> alleged "truth" (supposedly provided by Judy Wood) with a certain 
>> "plausible lie" - because, they claimed, I could not satisfactorily 
>> explain why "my" underground nukes did not damage the "bathtub" and PATH 
>> trains and stations."
>>
>> As I feel kind of personally addressed, I would like to say:
>>
>> - I personally think, that Judy Woods assumptions are correct
>>
>> - I have or had no contact whatsoever to her by any kind of means.
>>
>> So, I reject the claim, she has followers, that act like a cult.
>>
>> Actually I had physics as kind of hobby and found something fitting. So I 
>> heard of Tom Bearden and John Hutchison long ago, but not in connection to 
>> 9/11.
>>
>> I reject the idea of explosion by any kind of bomb, because of the missing 
>> material and the restriction of the demolition to the area above the 
>> surface level.
>
>The missing material was just material vaporized to ultra fine and once the 
>material was that small it floated away in tremendous clouds of debris.  And 
>nukes can do that but more specifically MRR nukes can do that and leave less 
>of a trail then American made nukes would leave.
>
>The restriction of the demolition was really a restriction on what you were 
>allowed to see of the demolition.  The places were molten metal was found 
>were poorly documented and about all I'd seen is someone point to a location 
>in a video and most people state where they think the molten metal was in 
>the basements of the Twin Towers but it is more likely that the literal "hot 
>spots" were off to the side of the Twin Towers.  And those "hot spots" would 
>be closer to the side of the Twin Towers furthest from the multi-floor 
>"Surviving Corners."
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
>> Also the phenomenon of those round holes, that go right through entire 
>> buildings, that would not fit to any kind of bombs.
>
>There was an assortment of different things used at the World Trade Center 
>besides the three MRR nukes that did the most damage to the World Trade 
>Center.
>
>
>> Such holes are present in WTC 4 and WTC 6. These holes contain almost no 
>> material, while in the remaining build you can still see office chairs and 
>> coffee machines.
>
>I do not know what you are talking about with WTC4 but I've seen the damage 
>done to WTC6 explained by the use of nukes with a nearly vertical blast like 
>the nukes that were used in the OKC bombing.  And yes the OKC bombing was 
>nuclear too but our government tried their best to blame it on a single 
>point bomb that does not explain why the damage done to the Alfred P. Murrah 
>building was consistent with the damage done to WTC6.
>
>Oh, and we can't forget all the toasted cars at GZ.  Those were just a 
>distraction just like the downed light poles at the Pentagon.  BTW if the 
>light poles at the Pentagon were really hit by a jet there would have been 
>jet fuel all over the lawn of the Pentagon.
>
>
>> So: whatever made the destruction is apparently capable of turning steel 
>> and concrete into nothing.
>
>MRR nukes can do that and those also explain why GZ was off limits to 
>everybody for 2 full days and then why radiation was monitored for days 
>after that.  BTW they told people the badges they had to wear were to 
>monitor air quality but if that were true they wouldn't have let anybody 
>work at GZ since they would have known the EPA lied about the air quality 
>right then and there but they were too involved in their own lies about the 
>badges at that time to notice that the EPA lied about the air quality.
>
>> How these devices operate is not well understood. But sooner or later this 
>> will change, since all kinds of idiots will like to have such a thing.
>
>The holes left by the MRR nukes that correspond to where people found molten 
>metal are the biggest give away what really destroyed the Twin Towers but 
>try to find documentation of what really happened with GZ after it was used 
>to put on a show for the public.
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
>> This again shows the enormous stupidity of the entire event, since it is 
>> kind of advertise for something, people would not have found for 
>> centuries.
>
>Others have already pointed out that the heavily damaged areas help prove 
>MRR nukes were used especially when you couple that with where the molten 
>metal was found.  BTW from what I've seen and heard the molten metal was 
>found at the three spots where the haze is coming from in the following 
>photo:
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
>> TH
>
>Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279131

In article <Ye6dneXg_vagKNTLnZ2dnUU7-UWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> "Thomas Heger" <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in message 
> news:datdm4F8gfoU1@mid.individual.net...
> > Am 16.11.2015 04:31, schrieb Rocky:
> >> Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO
> >>   https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/
> >>
> > I just have found the website of Dimitri Khalezov:
> >
> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/nuclear-demolition-of-the-world-trad
> > e-center-damage-to-bathtub/
> >
> > Quote:
> > "The most spiteful of these critics were supposed "followers of Judy Wood's 
> > theory" - the so-called conspiracy theory No.5 (or "DEW" theory) which we 
> > have already disproved in the corresponding Chapter of this book. 
> > Actually, these folks from "Judy Wood creed" bear striking similarities to 
> > a typical cult, but in reality it seems they are just a well-organized 
> > group of shills who pretend to behave as if it were a indeed a "cult". 
> > These folks attempted to "debunk" my "theory" (thus, clearly ignoring my 
> > statement that I am not a "theorist" but a "witness" and therefore my 
> > supposed "theory" is not actually a "theory" and therefore can not be 
> > treated as such) by claiming that I allegedly could not explain why "my" 
> > "alleged" "underground nuclear explosions" did not damage the so-called 
> > "bathtub" and why they did not damage PATH (the underground train system).
> >
> > These shills from the little army headed by Judy Wood pretended not to 
> > notice the definition of "ground zero" in pre-9/11 English language, they 
> > preferred not to notice high temperatures that unexplainably persisted 
> > underground for almost 4 months, and they preferred not to notice leukemia 
> > and other radiation-related cancers strangely endemic among the ground 
> > zero responders.
> >
> > They continue to stubbornly insist that the WTC was demolished by 
> > mysterious "laser beams from space", which, in their opinions, should 
> > successfully explain both - "dustifications" of the Towers and the 
> > underground fires (along with "ground zero" name). Moreover, they claim 
> > that I was allegedly hired by the U.S. Government to "dissolve" their 
> > alleged "truth" (supposedly provided by Judy Wood) with a certain 
> > "plausible lie" - because, they claimed, I could not satisfactorily 
> > explain why "my" underground nukes did not damage the "bathtub" and PATH 
> > trains and stations."
> >
> > As I feel kind of personally addressed, I would like to say:
> >
> > - I personally think, that Judy Woods assumptions are correct
> >
> > - I have or had no contact whatsoever to her by any kind of means.
> >
> > So, I reject the claim, she has followers, that act like a cult.
> >
> > Actually I had physics as kind of hobby and found something fitting. So I 
> > heard of Tom Bearden and John Hutchison long ago, but not in connection to 
> > 9/11.
> >
> > I reject the idea of explosion by any kind of bomb, because of the missing 
> > material and the restriction of the demolition to the area above the 
> > surface level.
> 
> The missing material was just material vaporized to ultra fine and once the 
> material was that small it floated away in tremendous clouds of debris.  And 
> nukes can do that but more specifically MRR nukes can do that and leave less 
> of a trail then American made nukes would leave.
> 
> The restriction of the demolition was really a restriction on what you were 
> allowed to see of the demolition.  The places were molten metal was found 
> were poorly documented and about all I'd seen is someone point to a location 
> in a video and most people state where they think the molten metal was in 
> the basements of the Twin Towers but it is more likely that the literal "hot 
> spots" were off to the side of the Twin Towers.  And those "hot spots" would 
> be closer to the side of the Twin Towers furthest from the multi-floor 
> "Surviving Corners."
>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> 
> > Also the phenomenon of those round holes, that go right through entire 
> > buildings, that would not fit to any kind of bombs.
> 
> There was an assortment of different things used at the World Trade Center 
> besides the three MRR nukes that did the most damage to the World Trade 
> Center.
> 
> 
> > Such holes are present in WTC 4 and WTC 6. These holes contain almost no 
> > material, while in the remaining build you can still see office chairs and 
> > coffee machines.
> 
> I do not know what you are talking about with WTC4 but I've seen the damage 
> done to WTC6 explained by the use of nukes with a nearly vertical blast like 
> the nukes that were used in the OKC bombing.  And yes the OKC bombing was 
> nuclear too but our government tried their best to blame it on a single 
> point bomb that does not explain why the damage done to the Alfred P. Murrah 
> building was consistent with the damage done to WTC6.
> 
> Oh, and we can't forget all the toasted cars at GZ.  Those were just a 
> distraction just like the downed light poles at the Pentagon.  BTW if the 
> light poles at the Pentagon were really hit by a jet there would have been 
> jet fuel all over the lawn of the Pentagon.
> 
> 
> > So: whatever made the destruction is apparently capable of turning steel 
> > and concrete into nothing.
> 
> MRR nukes can do that and those also explain why GZ was off limits to 
> everybody for 2 full days and then why radiation was monitored for days 
> after that.  BTW they told people the badges they had to wear were to 
> monitor air quality but if that were true they wouldn't have let anybody 
> work at GZ since they would have known the EPA lied about the air quality 
> right then and there but they were too involved in their own lies about the 
> badges at that time to notice that the EPA lied about the air quality.
> 
> > How these devices operate is not well understood. But sooner or later this 
> > will change, since all kinds of idiots will like to have such a thing.
> 
> The holes left by the MRR nukes that correspond to where people found molten 
> metal are the biggest give away what really destroyed the Twin Towers but 
> try to find documentation of what really happened with GZ after it was used 
> to put on a show for the public.
>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> 
> > This again shows the enormous stupidity of the entire event, since it is 
> > kind of advertise for something, people would not have found for 
> > centuries.
> 
> Others have already pointed out that the heavily damaged areas help prove 
> MRR nukes were used especially when you couple that with where the molten 
> metal was found.  BTW from what I've seen and heard the molten metal was 
> found at the three spots where the haze is coming from in the following 
> photo:
>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> 
> > TH
> 
> Rocky 

I knew something was up. when the "w' administration avoided an an 
inquiry a real investigation.  Like they were hiding something.
They were the perps and of course they didn't want the Truth .
Killing 3000+ was just "collateral" damage to them in their wars for Oil.
and'
The globalist terrorists who control Washington, London, Ottawa, Paris, 
and other Western capitals have killed upwards of two million innocent 
people in Iraq from 1991 to 2011. Everything in that nation has been 
destroyed except the people's will to fight and resist.

Add the number of two million slaughtered Iraqis with three thousand 
 who were sacrificed on September 11, thousands of Afghans, and 
thousands of Pakistanis, Yemenis, Libyans, Lebanese, Palestinians, and, 
soon to be, Syrians.

If the globalist death cult and zionist monsters attack Persia next, the 
death toll of the war on terror will exceed 10 million, and maybe even 
more.

But it's not just Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Pakistan, and other 
Middle Eastern nations that have been targeted for destruction by the 
globalist conquerors. America, Canada, and Mexico have also been 
targeted for economic, cultural, spiritual, and political destruction.

Below are nine ways the globalist traitors in the U.S. government are 
waging war against the American people and the American Constitution. 

1. Mexico Has Been Bankrupted And Destabilized By The Globalist 
Terrorists On Purpose. They Have Also Opened The Borders To Unlimited 
and Illegal Immigration From Mexico. The Globalist Corporations And 
Technocrats Have Used The New Cheap Labor Class To Drive Down Wages in 
America And Bankrupt States.

After The Damage Is Done On Both Sides of The Border, The Globalist 
Traitors Will Bring In A New Political And Economic System With New 
Draconian Laws. And They Are Making Trillions of Dollars In The Process.

2. Globalist Traitors In The U.S. Military And Intelligence 
Establishment Have Used Military Planes and Covert CIA Teams To Ship In 
Drugs Into America For Domestic And Foreign Purposes, As Well as For 
Political And Financial Gain.

List of Purposes: Finance Black Budgets In The Shadow CIA And Other 
Intelligence Agencies; Build Up The Police State Industry And Militarize 
Cops; Create A New Prison Industrial Complex To Create Jobs And A New 
Subclass of Convicts; Ruin The Social Stability of Black and Latino 
Communities By Denying Them Jobs And Making Drugs Easy To Sell and Buy; 
Make Well Trained Police Officers Play Cops N' Robbers With Uneducated 
and Aimless Young Drug Dealers - Members of Both Groups Futilely Die By 
Playing This Sick and Sophisticated Tag Game of Death.

3. The Globalist Traitors Have Armed Mexican Drug Cartels With 
American-Made Weapons To Increase Drug War Violence As Part of A Bigger 
Ploy To Blame Gun Rights in America, Discredit Self-Defense Weapons, And 
Destroy The Second Amendment.

4. There Is No Justice For Victims of TSA And U.S./Israeli State Terror. 
Federal Judges Are Bribed, Deceived And Coerced By The Globalist 
Traitors To Kill National Security Cases And Destroy The Lives of 
Individuals Who Stick Up For Themselves And For America. The Court of 
Law Has Been Destroyed. A Trial By Media Society Has Been Created In Its 
Place. Bribed Judges Are Used To Dismiss Lawsuits Against The Government 
Brought Forward By Brave Individuals Like Former Governor Jesse Ventura 
And 9/11 Victim April Gallop.

5. Corporate And Banking Looting of Public Assets and Government 
Treasury By Globalist Insiders. These Snakes Think They Will Survive 
Without Getting Caught. But Some of Them Are Smart And Have Bought Homes 
In Latin America, Dubai, And Other Regions Around The World. These 
Rotten Thieves Will Burn America Down And Then Flee The Country.
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279155

In article <georgewk10-5B1787.10015316112015@news.toast.net>,
 Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:

> -- 
> Karma ; what a concept!

Visit http://www.selectsmart.com/DISCUSS/list.php?16
they don't censor!
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279159

"Shoe-Chucker 2" <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:georgewk10-F5A292.14103916112015@news.toast.net...
> In article <georgewk10-5B1787.10015316112015@news.toast.net>,
> Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> -- 
>> Karma ; what a concept!
>
> Visit http://www.selectsmart.com/DISCUSS/list.php?16
> they don't censor!
> -- 
> Karma ; what a concept!

COOL and TNX
    Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279163

In article <i66dnWLFOc7N_dfLnZ2dnUU7-emdnZ2d@giganews.com>, 
wookiee@att.net says...
> 
> "Shoe-Chucker 2" <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
> news:georgewk10-F5A292.14103916112015@news.toast.net...
> > In article <georgewk10-5B1787.10015316112015@news.toast.net>,
> > Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> -- 
> >> Karma ; what a concept!
> >
> > Visit http://www.selectsmart.com/DISCUSS/list.php?16
> > they don't censor!

Yeah, he's allowed to spout his horseshit there, just like you and he do 
here.

> > -- 
> > Karma ; what a concept!
> 
> COOL and TNX
>     Rocky 

Seems like UpChucker's kOOktardery isn't any better received there than 
his and yours are here.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279176

"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message 
news:MPG.30b4518bbe7eef6898c3cb@news.giganews.com...
> In article <i66dnWLFOc7N_dfLnZ2dnUU7-emdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> wookiee@att.net says...
>>
>> "Shoe-Chucker 2" <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:georgewk10-F5A292.14103916112015@news.toast.net...
>> > In article <georgewk10-5B1787.10015316112015@news.toast.net>,
>> > Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> -- 
>> >> Karma ; what a concept!
>> >
>> > Visit http://www.selectsmart.com/DISCUSS/list.php?16
>> > they don't censor!
>
> Yeah, he's allowed to spout his horseshit there, just like you and he do
> here.
>
>> > -- 
>> > Karma ; what a concept!
>>
>> COOL and TNX
>>     Rocky
>
> Seems like UpChucker's kOOktardery isn't any better received there than
> his and yours are here.

Why is it that every single time you post you also post every single thing 
that you know about 9/11?

Give up?  It is because you don't know anything about 9/11 like the sirens 
used in WTC7 were broadcasting the international code for a nuclear 
destruction.
See: "Code Alarms For 911 Nuclear Destruction"
 http://www.zenzoneforum.com/threads/26831-Code-Alarms-For-911-Nuclear-Destruction

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279182

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n2fkha$d5g$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>Give up?  It is because you don't know anything about 9/11 like the sirens
>>used in WTC7 were broadcasting the international code for a nuclear
>>destruction.
>
> "International code for a nuclear destruction"?
>
> Where the hell do you k00ktards come up with such stupidity?
>
> OK, I'll say it.  Give us a reference to the ISO/OSI document defining the
> "international siren codes for nuclear destruction".  Hehehe... Rocky
> will never answer this one...  Oh he will, but the reply will be something
> about CGIs or Flight 93 or something else unrelated.

Keep going.  Give me some quotes from your mysterious document because from 
my search it sounds more like a normal air raid siren.

> And I watched the kookvid (even though you warned me it's a pack of lies):
> Why the heck would it be broadcasting a code for "nuclear destruction of
> Tower 2" when, judging from the damage and debris, it looks like Tower 2
> had already collapsed?

There was a nother video that shows WTC3 with a big grouge in it and that 
was what happened after WTC2 was nuked.  Once WTC1 was nuked nearly all of 
WTC3 was vaporized except the corner furthest from the MRR nuke.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And do not forget you still have no valid explanation for why so much 
survived at the very bottom of the Twin Towers when they should have been 
crushed from falling debris and you have no evidence to when the basements 
of the Twin Towers and WTC7 were really blown out but photos show windows 
blown out long before the Twin Towers were nuked so that points to 
explosives in the basements or lower levels to redirect the water supply to 
the lower floors help keep the fires burning above.

> It's a freaking fire alarm.

And yet they don't use fire alarms like that in school.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279207

In article <KsWdnWpYc-AKA9bLnZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> International code for a nuclear destruction"?

And Afghanistan didn't do 9/11. nor did any Muslims. It was an inside 
job by the CIA and the neo-cons.
Start your quest for the truth by Googling ; 9/11 Truth.
and check out the Facebook stuff.
The Truth shall set your free.
Or at least keep you out of wars for Oil. and gas pipelines in 
Afghanistan.
Maybe.
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279236

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:36:05 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
<georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <KsWdnWpYc-AKA9bLnZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> International code for a nuclear destruction"?
>
>And Afghanistan didn't do 9/11. nor did any Muslims. It was an inside 
>job by the CIA and the neo-cons.

     Yet, after 14 years, you've never been able to offer any evidence
of this.

>Start your quest for the truth by Googling ; 9/11 Truth.
>and check out the Facebook stuff.
>The Truth shall set your free.

     If only the Troofer religion offered some. Alas, it does not.

>Or at least keep you out of wars for Oil. and gas pipelines in 
>Afghanistan.
>Maybe.

     Considering how little oil we get from the region, a war over it
would be pointless. But that's another aspect of reality you Troofers
can't accept.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279246

"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:438r4bdg6ldtvahp68j42cno4jg6hl32fk@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:36:05 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
> <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <KsWdnWpYc-AKA9bLnZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> International code for a nuclear destruction"?
>>
>>And Afghanistan didn't do 9/11. nor did any Muslims. It was an inside
>>job by the CIA and the neo-cons.
>
>     Yet, after 14 years, you've never been able to offer any evidence
> of this.

You mean other than the four jets that are consistent with CGIs, the 
buildings that did not fall down on themseleves and the lack of debris at 
Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon?

You the one that has to be an idiot to overlook so much evidence that 9/11 
was not what we were told it was.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279247

On 20/11/2015 14:38, Rocky wrote:
> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:438r4bdg6ldtvahp68j42cno4jg6hl32fk@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:36:05 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
>> <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <KsWdnWpYc-AKA9bLnZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> International code for a nuclear destruction"?
>>>
>>> And Afghanistan didn't do 9/11. nor did any Muslims. It was an inside
>>> job by the CIA and the neo-cons.
>>
>>      Yet, after 14 years, you've never been able to offer any evidence
>> of this.
>
> You mean other than the four jets that are consistent with CGIs, the
> buildings that did not fall down on themseleves and the lack of debris at
> Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon?
>
> You the one that has to be an idiot to overlook so much evidence that 9/11
> was not what we were told it was.  <G>
>
> Rocky
>
>

I have never seen videos of all of the jets at 911.
Can you post links to such videos?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279252

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:n2no9i$g88$1@dont-email.me...
> On 20/11/2015 14:38, Rocky wrote:
>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:438r4bdg6ldtvahp68j42cno4jg6hl32fk@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:36:05 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
>>> <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <KsWdnWpYc-AKA9bLnZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> International code for a nuclear destruction"?
>>>>
>>>> And Afghanistan didn't do 9/11. nor did any Muslims. It was an inside
>>>> job by the CIA and the neo-cons.
>>>
>>>      Yet, after 14 years, you've never been able to offer any evidence
>>> of this.
>>
>> You mean other than the four jets that are consistent with CGIs, the
>> buildings that did not fall down on themseleves and the lack of debris at
>> Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon?
>>
>> You the one that has to be an idiot to overlook so much evidence that 
>> 9/11
>> was not what we were told it was.  <G>
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>
> I have never seen videos of all of the jets at 911.

Google is your friend.  See:
9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
 http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html

> Can you post links to such videos?

Who says CGIs all have to be videos?  They had still photos of the CGIs in 
Nuke York City and with all the bullshit stories about 757s at the Pentagon 
and Pranksville, PA CGI could also mean Criminal Generated Images that you 
can only see with a wild imagination like yours..

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279271

On 20/11/2015 21:43, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:n2no9i$g88$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 20/11/2015 14:38, Rocky wrote:
>>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:438r4bdg6ldtvahp68j42cno4jg6hl32fk@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:36:05 -0800, Shoe-Chucker 2
>>>> <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <KsWdnWpYc-AKA9bLnZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> International code for a nuclear destruction"?
>>>>>
>>>>> And Afghanistan didn't do 9/11. nor did any Muslims. It was an inside
>>>>> job by the CIA and the neo-cons.
>>>>
>>>>       Yet, after 14 years, you've never been able to offer any evidence
>>>> of this.
>>>
>>> You mean other than the four jets that are consistent with CGIs, the
>>> buildings that did not fall down on themseleves and the lack of debris at
>>> Pranksville, PA and the Pentagon?
>>>
>>> You the one that has to be an idiot to overlook so much evidence that
>>> 9/11
>>> was not what we were told it was.  <G>
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I have never seen videos of all of the jets at 911.
>
> Google is your friend.  See:
> 9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
>   http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html
>
>> Can you post links to such videos?
>
> Who says CGIs all have to be videos?  They had still photos of the CGIs in
> Nuke York City and with all the bullshit stories about 757s at the Pentagon
> and Pranksville, PA CGI could also mean Criminal Generated Images that you
> can only see with a wild imagination like yours..
>
> Rocky
>
>

So you cant do it, thanks for clearing that up.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279175

"Thomas Heger" <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in message 
news:davo6sFr042U1@mid.individual.net...
> Am 16.11.2015 11:50, schrieb Rocky:
>> "Thomas Heger"<ttt_heg@web.de>  wrote in message
>> news:datdm4F8gfoU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> Am 16.11.2015 04:31, schrieb Rocky:
>>>> Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO
>>>>    https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/
>>>>
>>> I just have found the website of Dimitri Khalezov:
>>>
>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/nuclear-demolition-of-the-world-trade-center-damage-to-bathtub/
>>>
>>> Quote:
>>> "The most spiteful of these critics were supposed "followers of Judy 
>>> Wood's
>>> theory" - the so-called conspiracy theory No.5 (or "DEW" theory) which 
>>> we
>>> have already disproved in the corresponding Chapter of this book.
>>> Actually, these folks from "Judy Wood creed" bear striking similarities 
>>> to
>>> a typical cult, but in reality it seems they are just a well-organized
>>> group of shills who pretend to behave as if it were a indeed a "cult".
>>> These folks attempted to "debunk" my "theory" (thus, clearly ignoring my
>>> statement that I am not a "theorist" but a "witness" and therefore my
>>> supposed "theory" is not actually a "theory" and therefore can not be
>>> treated as such) by claiming that I allegedly could not explain why "my"
>>> "alleged" "underground nuclear explosions" did not damage the so-called
>>> "bathtub" and why they did not damage PATH (the underground train 
>>> system).
>>>
>>> These shills from the little army headed by Judy Wood pretended not to
>>> notice the definition of "ground zero" in pre-9/11 English language, 
>>> they
>>> preferred not to notice high temperatures that unexplainably persisted
>>> underground for almost 4 months, and they preferred not to notice 
>>> leukemia
>>> and other radiation-related cancers strangely endemic among the ground
>>> zero responders.
>>>
>>> They continue to stubbornly insist that the WTC was demolished by
>>> mysterious "laser beams from space", which, in their opinions, should
>>> successfully explain both - "dustifications" of the Towers and the
>>> underground fires (along with "ground zero" name). Moreover, they claim
>>> that I was allegedly hired by the U.S. Government to "dissolve" their
>>> alleged "truth" (supposedly provided by Judy Wood) with a certain
>>> "plausible lie" - because, they claimed, I could not satisfactorily
>>> explain why "my" underground nukes did not damage the "bathtub" and PATH
>>> trains and stations."
>>>
>>> As I feel kind of personally addressed, I would like to say:
>>>
>>> - I personally think, that Judy Woods assumptions are correct
>>>
>>> - I have or had no contact whatsoever to her by any kind of means.
>>>
>>> So, I reject the claim, she has followers, that act like a cult.
>>>
>>> Actually I had physics as kind of hobby and found something fitting. So 
>>> I
>>> heard of Tom Bearden and John Hutchison long ago, but not in connection 
>>> to
>>> 9/11.
>>>
>>> I reject the idea of explosion by any kind of bomb, because of the 
>>> missing
>>> material and the restriction of the demolition to the area above the
>>> surface level.
>>
>> The missing material was just material vaporized to ultra fine and once 
>> the
>> material was that small it floated away in tremendous clouds of debris. 
>> And
>> nukes can do that but more specifically MRR nukes can do that and leave 
>> less
>> of a trail then American made nukes would leave.
>
> "Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever ! "
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4FkO5ry1uo
>
> Quote.
> "Building 6 was a 1/2 million sq ft building with its core missing on 
> september 11th 2001 , the interior of the building is missing , it was not 
> crushed or on fire ,no nano thermite , no mini nukes , or explosions the 
> walls are intact the basement is intact the only thing that stands out is 
> cardboard and wires have little to no damage ."
>
>
> So: we have NO explosion, but an *implosion*.
>
> This is actually different and what see are remains from matter, which 
> simply manage to get missing.
>
> It is like 'being sucked into a black hole'.
>
> This pattern of destruction we see at all the buildings.
>
> TH

There is a very easy explanation for WTC6.  See:
 https://donaldfox.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/potentialplacementofverylowyieldminineutronnukes.jpgor see the entire story at: https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279179

Am 17.11.2015 16:26, schrieb Rocky:
..
>> "Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever !"
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4FkO5ry1uo
>>
>> Quote.
>> "Building 6 was a 1/2 million sq ft building with its core missing on
>> september 11th 2001 , the interior of the building is missing , it was not
>> crushed or on fire ,no nano thermite , no mini nukes , or explosions the
>> walls are intact the basement is intact the only thing that stands out is
>> cardboard and wires have little to no damage ."
>>
>>
>> So: we have NO explosion, but an *implosion*.
>>
>> This is actually different and what see are remains from matter, which
>> simply manage to get missing.
>>
>> It is like 'being sucked into a black hole'.
>>
>> This pattern of destruction we see at all the buildings.
>>
>> TH
>
> There is a very easy explanation for WTC6.  ... see the entire story at: https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/
>
Quote:

  "The Temperature of the Pile

Temperatures at Ground Zero were 600 to 1,500 °F or even higher for 6 
months after 9/11. Firemen were fighting fires at Ground Zero for 99 
days after 9/11. AVRIS data showed that temperature in one spot was 
1,341 °F on 9/16/01. These high temperatures could be attributed to 
neutron bombs that were detonated underground in order to destroy the 
foundations of the Twin Towers. Some of the hotspots may have been 
unexploded nuclear fissile material reacting underground.
"

There is one problem:

"911- Intact paper fused with melted WTC steel "
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruPK1EMY3k4

Paper seemed to be undisturbed by the event and was flying around in 
large quantities. Paper managed to stay readable, after being molten 
together with steel.

There is actually only one known phenomenon, where metal objects fuse 
together with wood (and similar materials) at low temperature:

the so called 'Hutchison Effect'.


"The Hutchison Effect - Iron Bar Warping and Fuming from Directed Energy 
(Laboratory Experiment) "

In this experiment there is a specific 'hum' audible. Such a hum is also 
audible on a few videos, that have been made on 9-11 on the WTC area 
prior to the collapse.

(Need to search for an example, so please wait..)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnBdhsXl088


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279181

"Thomas Heger" <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in message 
news:db1ga5Faf3uU1@mid.individual.net...
> Am 17.11.2015 16:26, schrieb Rocky:
> ..
>>> "Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever !"
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4FkO5ry1uo
>>>
>>> Quote.
>>> "Building 6 was a 1/2 million sq ft building with its core missing on
>>> september 11th 2001 , the interior of the building is missing , it was 
>>> not
>>> crushed or on fire ,no nano thermite , no mini nukes , or explosions the
>>> walls are intact the basement is intact the only thing that stands out 
>>> is
>>> cardboard and wires have little to no damage ."
>>>
>>>
>>> So: we have NO explosion, but an *implosion*.
>>>
>>> This is actually different and what see are remains from matter, which
>>> simply manage to get missing.
>>>
>>> It is like 'being sucked into a black hole'.
>>>
>>> This pattern of destruction we see at all the buildings.
>>>
>>> TH
>>
>> There is a very easy explanation for WTC6.  ... see the entire story at: 
>> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/
>>
> Quote:
>
>  "The Temperature of the Pile
>
> Temperatures at Ground Zero were 600 to 1,500 °F or even higher for 6 
> months after 9/11. Firemen were fighting fires at Ground Zero for 99 days 
> after 9/11. AVRIS data showed that temperature in one spot was 1,341 °F on 
> 9/16/01. These high temperatures could be attributed to neutron bombs that 
> were detonated underground in order to destroy the foundations of the Twin 
> Towers. Some of the hotspots may have been unexploded nuclear fissile 
> material reacting underground.
> "
>
> There is one problem:
>
> "911- Intact paper fused with melted WTC steel "
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruPK1EMY3k4

That is a weird one and maybe the same person that told me about the MRR 
nukes also knows the answer to that.  But a quick guess makes me think 
something happened to the oxygen instead of the paper so the paper couldn' t 
burn.

> Paper seemed to be undisturbed by the event and was flying around in large 
> quantities. Paper managed to stay readable, after being molten together 
> with steel.
>
> There is actually only one known phenomenon, where metal objects fuse 
> together with wood (and similar materials) at low temperature:
>
> the so called 'Hutchison Effect'.
>
>
> "The Hutchison Effect - Iron Bar Warping and Fuming from Directed Energy 
> (Laboratory Experiment) "
>
> In this experiment there is a specific 'hum' audible. Such a hum is also 
> audible on a few videos, that have been made on 9-11 on the WTC area prior 
> to the collapse.

I have no doubt that a variety of different things were used on 9/11 and I 
also know they planted a few things like the downed light poles at the 
Pentagon, or the toasted cars at the WTC just to throw people off track.

> (Need to search for an example, so please wait..)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnBdhsXl088
>
>
> TH

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279268

Am 17.11.2015 22:20, schrieb Rocky:
> "Thomas Heger"<ttt_heg@web.de>  wrote in message
> news:db1ga5Faf3uU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Am 17.11.2015 16:26, schrieb Rocky:
>> ..
>>>> "Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever !"
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4FkO5ry1uo
>>>>
>>>> Quote.
>>>> "Building 6 was a 1/2 million sq ft building with its core missing on
>>>> september 11th 2001 , the interior of the building is missing , it was
>>>> not
>>>> crushed or on fire ,no nano thermite , no mini nukes , or explosions the
>>>> walls are intact the basement is intact the only thing that stands out
>>>> is
>>>> cardboard and wires have little to no damage ."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So: we have NO explosion, but an *implosion*.
>>>>
>>>> This is actually different and what see are remains from matter, which
>>>> simply manage to get missing.
>>>>
>>>> It is like 'being sucked into a black hole'.
>>>>
>>>> This pattern of destruction we see at all the buildings.
>>>>
>>>> TH
>>>
>>> There is a very easy explanation for WTC6.  ... see the entire story at:
>>> https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/mystery-solved-the-wtc-was-nuked-on-911/
>>>
>> Quote:
>>
>>   "The Temperature of the Pile
>>
>> Temperatures at Ground Zero were 600 to 1,500 °F or even higher for 6
>> months after 9/11. Firemen were fighting fires at Ground Zero for 99 days
>> after 9/11. AVRIS data showed that temperature in one spot was 1,341 °F on
>> 9/16/01. These high temperatures could be attributed to neutron bombs that
>> were detonated underground in order to destroy the foundations of the Twin
>> Towers. Some of the hotspots may have been unexploded nuclear fissile
>> material reacting underground.
>> "
>>
>> There is one problem:
>>
>> "911- Intact paper fused with melted WTC steel"
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruPK1EMY3k4
>
> That is a weird one and maybe the same person that told me about the MRR
> nukes also knows the answer to that.  But a quick guess makes me think
> something happened to the oxygen instead of the paper so the paper couldn' t
> burn.


You could check it yourself: put inert gas (like N2 or CO2) in a jar 
with some paper and make this hot.

What I would expect: the paper would not burn, but get very black.

Also the ink would change colour or even evaporate.

So: readable paper requires temperatures of less then - say- 300 °C.

But (usually) steel melts at about 1600 °C.

So we need some other mechanism, which makes steel melt, without getting 
hot.

And there was something acting, which made this steel disappear.

The remaining steel was extremely curved and rusty, fused together and 
had holes like a sponge. Also fine powder and tiny balls of steel were 
found.

But most obscure: there was WAY to little steel remaining, overall.

So we need something VERY unusual and something very different from just 
dropping down from 400 meters.

The only known phenomena are:
- the so called 'Hutchison effect'
- the 'Philadelphia experiment'.

The second for this reason: a ship is a very large steel structure. In 
the 'Philadelphia experiment' this ship was allegedly 'teleported and 
appeared somewhere else.

In Philadelphia then something was missing: lots of steel.

>> Paper seemed to be undisturbed by the event and was flying around in large
>> quantities. Paper managed to stay readable, after being molten together
>> with steel.
>>
>> There is actually only one known phenomenon, where metal objects fuse
>> together with wood (and similar materials) at low temperature:
>>
>> the so called 'Hutchison Effect'.
>>
>>
>> "The Hutchison Effect - Iron Bar Warping and Fuming from Directed Energy
>> (Laboratory Experiment) "
>>
>> In this experiment there is a specific 'hum' audible. Such a hum is also
>> audible on a few videos, that have been made on 9-11 on the WTC area prior
>> to the collapse.
>
> I have no doubt that a variety of different things were used on 9/11 and I
> also know they planted a few things like the downed light poles at the
> Pentagon, or the toasted cars at the WTC just to throw people off track.


Well, maybe, maybe not.

But first things first, and that are the twin-towers.

TH

>> (Need to search for an example, so please wait..)
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnBdhsXl088
>>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy

csiph-web