Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #271731 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-06 07:12 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-08-16 11:54 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 742 — 47 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 07:12 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 08:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 09:44 -0400
Re: Nuke Em gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-06 09:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 16:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 06:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-07 09:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 00:38 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 06:13 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 11:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 11:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 17:22 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 12:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 18:28 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 18:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 18:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:12 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 01:27 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:16 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:11 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:51 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 23:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 01:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 06:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 10:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 18:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 14:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 20:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 15:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (laughing at Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 22:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Mattb. <trdell1234@outlook.com> - 2015-08-09 22:35 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 02:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em 2-Methyl-2-Chlorobutyl-Methylphenol-CinnamylN1-Methylbutyrate <distracted.blonde.ammunition-whore@alt.comedy.thin-lingerie-lass> - 2015-08-10 09:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "grizzled laggard" <degenerate.haddock.pasty@unsatisfactory.kookooyumyumpoon> - 2015-08-13 01:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:00 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:00 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 17:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 15:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-12 20:44 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 08:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:06 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 17:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-14 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 09:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:50 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 20:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em "Khepernefru II" <gimpy.cock.squeezer@rattle.boned.hoo-hoo> - 2015-08-17 00:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:24 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:35 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 22:08 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Halstead Lippergold-onnerhall" <holy@mackerel.orgy> - 2015-08-16 13:54 +0800
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 06:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Surviving the Halstead shit storm) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:45 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 20:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Jim's meltdown) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-17 16:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-17 12:06 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 19:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Question for FNV "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:37 -0500
Re: Question for FNV Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 06:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:27 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:30 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:54 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 23:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 03:42 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 06:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-17 23:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 02:50 +0200
Dook Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-18 03:43 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 19:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:57 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:51 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:13 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:49 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:23 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 23:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <anon@anon.anon> - 2015-08-17 17:34 +0800
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:02 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.games.video.crossdressing> - 2015-08-18 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:56 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:13 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 08:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:48 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 11:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 19:22 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 20:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.support.just.venting> - 2015-08-21 10:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:10 +0200
2 Rick (was: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:31 -0500
No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:42 -0500
Re: No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:30 -0500
Re: No Holograms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:51 +0000
Re: Re: No Holograms Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:07 -0400
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:37 +0000
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:37 -0400
Re: Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:23 +0200
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 13:18 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 12:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 20:36 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 00:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 01:16 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 14:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 09:33 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:31 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 05:40 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 01:29 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 17:17 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 22:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 20:13 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 22:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 18:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 19:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 21:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:48 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:02 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:28 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:09 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:17 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 18:29 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 06:59 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:38 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 18:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 09:00 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 16:35 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 00:01 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 21:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 22:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.arts.books.chronic.constipation> - 2015-08-18 11:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:01 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (temper) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (temper) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:51 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:30 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:36 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 14:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 19:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:29 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:12 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:30 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:24 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:22 +0100
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:17 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 17:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 17:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 18:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:46 -0500
NOMINATION: Kook of the Month Re: Nuke Em "Pacesetter" <pace@setter.boss> - 2015-08-13 10:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 08:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 10:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 13:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:06 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 19:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:21 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:29 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 00:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 23:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:53 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.humour.funny.why.breathing.is.good.for.you> - 2015-08-16 03:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 06:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Quukur the inventive lizard-quaverer" <bat-fowling.credulous.fool@flapping.bacilliform.hasty.flirt-gill> - 2015-08-15 13:00 +0800
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Netjershema IV" <scorched.beaver@ripe.mommy.button> - 2015-08-16 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@soc.religion.prostatitis.worried.dude> - 2015-08-17 03:02 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:18 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 20:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 18:43 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:18 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:06 +0100
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:39 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 18:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:02 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 19:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 15:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 20:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 08:07 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-14 18:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 02:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-13 09:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 10:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:45 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:35 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:26 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:59 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:25 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:54 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-12 15:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 10:58 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
2 Jeanne Douglas (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 08:48 -0500
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:53 +0000
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 12:23 -0700
Proving Hägar is a sack of shit (was: 2 Jeanne Douglas) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:01 -0500
Re: Proving Hägar is a sack of shit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: Proving H㦡r is a sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:16 +0200
Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:13 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 03:52 +0200
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:20 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:36 +0000
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 06:14 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:22 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 06:59 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:30 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 08:17 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:26 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 15:18 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 14:30 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:49 -0500
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:28 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Jim Noles <no_e-mails@nosuchserver.com> - 2015-08-23 17:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 00:54 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 08:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:17 +0000
? 4 Jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:25 -0500
Re: ? 4 Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:40 -0500
? 4 jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:14 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:43 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:42 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:16 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:01 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:36 +0000
Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:53 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:21 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:46 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:17 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:52 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:43 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-10 10:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-11 14:45 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "G=EMC^2TreBert" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 11:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 00:39 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-09 10:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 10:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 16:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 01:41 -0400
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-10 11:06 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 23:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 05:49 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:39 -0500
2nd ? for jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:21 -0500
Re: 2nd ? for jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:00 +0000
Re: 2nd ? for jim (was: Nuke Em) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 16:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 08:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 11:17 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 10:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:34 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 14:57 -0400
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 07:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 17:45 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:29 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 18:45 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 21:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 19:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 23:49 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 19:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:42 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:22 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 21:05 +0000
Jim's lies (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:01 -0500
Re: Jim's lies jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:30 +0000
Re: Jim's lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:28 -0500
Re: Jim's lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 18:42 +0100
Re: Jim's lies "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:25 -0500
Re: Jim's lies Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:29 +0100
Re: Jim's lies (was: Nuke Em) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-06 12:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 16:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-07 11:32 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-07 16:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-07 17:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 11:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:56 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 10:07 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 09:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-06 09:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-06 09:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 10:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "a425couple" <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:39 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:44 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2015-08-06 09:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 16:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Mapihal K. Donglemeier" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-08-08 15:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:26 -0400
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 22:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 07:32 -0400
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 17:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 11:54 -0700
Page 28 of 38 — ← Prev page 1 … 26 27 [28] 29 30 … 38 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 20:49 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) |
| Message-ID | <AredneoyJof0cVLInZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #272595 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8mlffs.rvi.17.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8mle4n.k7q.17.1@news.alt.net... >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>> news:w42dnT3ZZ_gKVFLInZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>> >>>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>>>> news:72605ecfd37587e55fb49fc14f62eca6@dizum.com... >>>>>> >>>>> < SNIP > >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure: >>>>>> <http://www.cct-seecity.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/030-NYC14204.jpg> >>>>>> See those tiny people in relation to that huge fucking pile of >>>>>> rubble towering 15 to 20 stories above them? LOL >>>> >>>> That is total bullshit because what you should see if you were >>>> really looking at the Twin Towers is something like this: >>>>> <http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5090/1289/1600/Ground%20Zero%20on%209111.jpg><Where >>>>> some outside walls of the Twin Towers were standing strong and >>>>> thatonly happens if a deep underground nuke vaporized the rest of >>>>> the buildingand couldn't reach the side furthest from it. DUH.And >>>>> down on the lower left of that photo you can see the surviving >>>>> corner ofWTC1 with the surviving staircase where over a dozen >>>>> people survived so youcan not call that staircase a debris pile >>>>> either. >>>>> <G>Hell, even WTC7 left a much larger pile of debris than the Twin >>>>> Towers andthe debris pile from WTC7 was small for a Controlled >>>>> Demoltion so it too hadto be an NCD that vaporized the lower part >>>>> of WTC7 and part of Fiterman Hallat the exact same time.And again, if >>>>> you look close at the evidence andconcentrate on what we werenot >>>>> told about the Twin Towers or we were not told about Fiterman Hall >>>>> thenthere is plenty of evidence of deep underground nukes being >>>>> used on the TwinTowers and WTC7.Rocky >>> >>> nukes aren't allowed in the USA so there was none >> >> You are such a bullshitter and the following link proves it. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peaceful_nuclear_explosion >> >> Rocky > > i don't go to any of your links , > nukes aren't allowed in the USA and , > everything you say is wrong If you hate wikipedia links that prove you dead wrong then you are one fcuked up poster and that gives me a valid reason to ignore your post the same way I ignore most of Kent Wills post. Rocky >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 18:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) |
| Message-ID | <8mlg2i.va0.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #272597 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8mlffs.rvi.17.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:8mle4n.k7q.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:w42dnT3ZZ_gKVFLInZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>>>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>>>>> news:72605ecfd37587e55fb49fc14f62eca6@dizum.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>> < SNIP > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure: >>>>>>> <http://www.cct-seecity.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/030-NYC14204.jpg> >>>>>>> See those tiny people in relation to that huge fucking pile of >>>>>>> rubble towering 15 to 20 stories above them? LOL >>>>> >>>>> That is total bullshit because what you should see if you were >>>>> really looking at the Twin Towers is something like this: >>>>>> <http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5090/1289/1600/Ground%20Zero%20on%209111.jpg><Where >>>>>> some outside walls of the Twin Towers were standing strong and >>>>>> thatonly happens if a deep underground nuke vaporized the rest of >>>>>> the buildingand couldn't reach the side furthest from it. DUH.And >>>>>> down on the lower left of that photo you can see the surviving >>>>>> corner ofWTC1 with the surviving staircase where over a dozen >>>>>> people survived so youcan not call that staircase a debris pile >>>>>> either. >>>>>> <G>Hell, even WTC7 left a much larger pile of debris than the >>>>>> Twin Towers andthe debris pile from WTC7 was small for a Controlled >>>>>> Demoltion so it too hadto be an NCD that vaporized the lower part >>>>>> of WTC7 and part of Fiterman Hallat the exact same time.And >>>>>> again, if you look close at the evidence andconcentrate on what we >>>>>> werenot >>>>>> told about the Twin Towers or we were not told about Fiterman >>>>>> Hall thenthere is plenty of evidence of deep underground nukes being >>>>>> used on the TwinTowers and WTC7.Rocky >>>> >>>> nukes aren't allowed in the USA so there was none >>> >>> You are such a bullshitter and the following link proves it. >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peaceful_nuclear_explosion >>> >>> Rocky >> >> i don't go to any of your links , >> nukes aren't allowed in the USA and , >> everything you say is wrong > > If you hate wikipedia links that prove you dead wrong then you are one > fcuked up poster and that gives me a valid reason to ignore your post > the same way I ignore most of Kent Wills post. > > Rocky i never said i hated anything so now you're telling more lies , and if you want to ignore me that's your business but , you're only doing it because everything you say is wrong and , ignoring me will do nothing but prove you're wrong
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 22:18 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) |
| Message-ID | <UZadnbI_84GAnE3InZ2dnUU7-R2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #272592 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:0b95ac-c6t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8mle4n.k7q.17.1@news.alt.net... > >>> nukes aren't allowed in the USA so there was none >> >> You are such a bullshitter and the following link proves it. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peaceful_nuclear_explosion > > He obviously meant private nukes, kook. > > Your link refers to a US government program that ended in 1973, kook. And why do you keep running away from the number one issue? <G> The number one issue is that nobody can explain the "Surviving Corners" of the Twin Towers besides someone that knows about Nuclear Controlled Demolitions. See: Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 08:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) |
| Message-ID | <64ydnZqaC7IaEE3InZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #272620 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:9pk5ac-t61.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> And why do you keep running away from the number one issue? <G> > > The facts are some airliners were hijacked. ROTFLMAO because you avoided the #2 issue again and that is just where did all the debris from the Twin Towers go then? And do not forget what the #1 issue is and that is: What could leave surviving corners from the Twin Towers other than a deep underground nuke? http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5090/1289/1600/Ground%20Zero%20on%209111.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) |
| Message-ID | <mqqcph$kuc$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #272674 |
On 16/08/2015 14:17, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:9pk5ac-t61.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> And why do you keep running away from the number one issue? <G> >> >> The facts are some airliners were hijacked. > > ROTFLMAO because you avoided the #2 issue again and that is just where did > all the debris from the Twin Towers go then? > > And do not forget what the #1 issue is and that is: What could leave > surviving corners from the Twin Towers other than a deep underground nuke? > http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5090/1289/1600/Ground%20Zero%20on%209111.jpg > > Well according to you an airburst 580m above ground. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 04:52 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) |
| Message-ID | <8359b99e1d11d5ef01f8a0ab67305f13@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #272572 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:w42dnT3ZZ_gKVFLInZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:72605ecfd37587e55fb49fc14f62eca6@dizum.com... > < SNIP > Still cowardly running away from the growing mountain of evidence that your brain is malfunctioning? LOL Kook. LOL >> Sure: >> <http://www.cct-seecity.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/030-NYC14204.jpg> >> See those tiny people in relation to that huge fucking pile of >> rubble towering 15 to 20 stories above them? LOL > That is total bullshit because what you should see if you were really > looking at the Twin Towers is something like this: > <http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5090/1289/1600/Ground%20Zero%20on%209111.jpg> > Where some outside walls of the Twin Towers were standing strong > and that only happens if a deep underground nuke vaporized the > rest of the buildingand couldn't reach the side furthest from it. If a nuke is strong enough to "vaporize the rest of the building", it wouldn't miss the lower corner of it, you idiotic know-nothing sans-science retard. Do you have any concept of just how powerful a nuclear explosion is? Do you even have *any* science-based education, because you sound 'trailer trash high-school dropout'. The buildings were hit by the aircraft on one side, much like a tree that's been chopped down. Thus they collapsed slightly sideways, away from your "Surviving Corner, Surviving Wall and Surviving Staircase", which means it could not have been any sort of controlled demolition. Aside from the above, I've already proven five different ways that nukes couldn't have been detonated on 9/11: 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. 2) The EMP pulse wasn't of sufficient intensity (because it was a chemical explosion and thus of longer duration and lower intensity) to do more than slightly disrupt the camera's video. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially a 150 kt nuke, given that a 1 kt nuke is sufficient to destroy electronics nearby), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to have burned out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics in a radius of dozens of miles. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It could have been depleted uranium, used as counterweight in airplanes. So either the planes were switched for 747s, or Boeing lied and was using DU instead of tungsten in the 767s in question. Or the Americium in the smoke detectors was scattered so finely that it was able to quickly decay to background radiation levels, but that'd be beta radiation... you didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take something on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 5) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. You will address and refute with third-party corroborable proof each point above in turn, or you will have no other option than to admit your broken and utterly uneducated brain is grasping at not only improbable but utterly impossible straws in trying to make sense of the 9/11 tragedy. Kook. LOL > DUH.And down on the lower left of that photo you can see the > surviving corner ofWTC1 with the surviving staircase where > over a dozen people survived so youcan not call that staircase > a debris pile either. Good of you to tacitly admit that the towers fell away from your "Surviving Corner, Surviving Wall and Surviving Staircase", and thus little rubble was in those areas.. This stands as your tacit admission that you know the towers fell slightly sideways because they'd been hit on one side by aircraft and thus fell at an angle, much as a tree does when chopped down, and away from the "Surviving Corner, Surviving Wall and Surviving Staircase", which stands as your tacit admission that you know it was a non-controlled collapse instead of a controlled demolition, which stands as your tacit admission that you know no nukes were detonated that day. Had it been a controlled demolition of any sort, the building would have fallen straight down, and crushed your "Surviving Corner, Surviving Wall and Surviving Staircase". So once again the very evidence the kook provides proves the kook wrong. LOL See how simple that was to admit your broken brain is wrong? And the psychological damage your brain took from being forced to make that admission should only require a slight increase in dosage of your psychiatric medication to ameliorate the psychological torment of knowing you've had the virtual rug pulled out from under your entire kooky belief system. LOL Kook. LOL > <G>Hell, even WTC7 left a much larger pile of debris than > the Twin Towers andthe debris pile from WTC7 was small for > a Controlled Demoltion Except it wasn't a controlled demolition, you've tacitly admitted that above in your statement of there being a "Surviving Corner, Surviving Wall and Surviving Staircase". The WTC7 rubble was tiny in comparison to the Twin Towers rubble. The photos I've provided prove that. In addition, you'll be getting right on explaining how WTC7 could create a rubble pile that was larger than the building itself. Kook. LOL > so it too hadto be an NCD that vaporized the lower part of WTC7 > and part of Fiterman Hallat the exact same time. And the severe heat from the fire at the Twin Towers, which buckled structural members and started fires in WTC7... that had nothing to do with the fact that WTC7 collapsed? That WTC7 also had the inferior spray-on insulation, and the fact that there is a long list of buildings in NYC alone with that spray-on insulation that have experienced such structural fire damage that they had partial or total collapse (despite retards like you k'laming that no buildings have ever collapsed from fires before)... that had nothing to do with it, too, right? LOL Kook. LOL > And again, if you look close at the evidence Which you're not doing. You're running away from all the evidence that your broken brain is feeding you a line of utterly impossible bullshit. Had you been educated in at least rudimentary physics, you'd realize this. Unfortunately for you, you're an uneducated idiot. LOL Kook. LOL > and concentrate on what we werenot told about the Twin Towers > or we were not told about Fiterman Hall thenthere is plenty of > evidence of deep underground nukes being used on the > TwinTowers and WTC7.Rocky You're beginning to run your words together, a sign that your brain is becoming flustered by the growing mountain of evidence that you're a delusional retard who is too stupid to understand simple physics and building engineering. Don't worry, it happens to every kook. It's a sign that you *are* a kook, as a matter of fact. LOL Kook. LOL -- Kadaitcha Man (aka HalfADickRick Mather) is an AUK veteran from way back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with that AUK pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda Russo), but ended up booting her to the curb because she's just a cunt hair away from being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a folding cart filled with recyclables so she can afford to buy cat food for herself and her dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given that she now looks like a reject from a zombie slasher flick, has cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck goiters, rotting gums, missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost his better half in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up with Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs have had plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience with gaiety, given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and turned out to be light in the loafers... which limits HalfADickRick's trolling abilities and precludes him laughing at the sissies. So he lost half his dick *and* now has no balls for trolling. "Big things are made out of little things." HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe. Message-ID: <d7419da693ffc53a544d5e1569ac9bfc@dizum.com> "all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e. everywhere at the same time)" Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the very means by which matter came to be formed from energy after the big bang, and most importantly, reality. Message-ID: <9eb660cc06ece30da6a8e7a947a65dfb@dizum.com> HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same thing... he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the statements: 1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because the negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each other." 2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from consciousness." MID: <269e51973939871be9eeaaef420f8a6c@dizum.com> "Who said it's your eyes that see?" HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity. "The Turing test is overrated anyway." HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing test. "The now you experience now simply moves to this now." HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past. Message-ID: <2e6f960b0b8c4a738b1116b41865cb35@dizum.com> HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself: "A fairyboy with an inadequate penis." Message-ID: <d4e79c0adde0074ee812eba8d9023f97@dizum.com> HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic bot he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and able to hold contextually-relevant conversations without any assistance... when challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work producing 5000 intelligent and contextually relevant replies per day to random posts, an easy task for a machine, HalfADickRick started backpedaling, evading and hurling insults. In actuality, he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right alongside it to lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the appearance, because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to tears yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming, fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his otherwise-dumbstruck mouth. <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 22:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) |
| Message-ID | <Be-dnSw1LYyjYlLInZ2dnUU7-XednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #272614 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:8359b99e1d11d5ef01f8a0ab67305f13@dizum.com... >> >>> Sure: >>> <http://www.cct-seecity.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/030-NYC14204.jpg> >>> See those tiny people in relation to that huge fucking pile of >>> rubble towering 15 to 20 stories above them? LOL > >> That is total bullshit because what you should see if you were really >> looking at the Twin Towers is something like this: >> <http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5090/1289/1600/Ground%20Zero%20on%209111.jpg> >> Where some outside walls of the Twin Towers were standing strong >> and that only happens if a deep underground nuke vaporized the >> rest of the buildingand couldn't reach the side furthest from it. > > If a nuke is strong enough to "vaporize the rest of the > building", it wouldn't miss the lower corner of it, You are not even trying to think because if they wanted to vaporize every part of the Twin Towers all they had to do was detonate the nuke closer to the surface but then that would have blown their cover along with a large part of Manhattan Island too. It was the fact the nukes were very deep in rock and not directly under either of the Twin Towers that left the surviving corners of both the Twin Towers in the photo above. Shit, you are not even an expert on deep underground nukes and yet now you claim to know all about them. What a bullshitter you are. And since you classify as a bullshitter claiming to know how a deep underground nuke works without any practical experience I can ignore you too. BTW this should help you out: Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-15 20:25 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) |
| Message-ID | <8mll3g.sm1.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #272618 |
Rocky wrote: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > news:8359b99e1d11d5ef01f8a0ab67305f13@dizum.com... >>> >>>> Sure: >>>> <http://www.cct-seecity.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/030-NYC14204.jpg> >>>> See those tiny people in relation to that huge fucking pile of >>>> rubble towering 15 to 20 stories above them? LOL >> >>> That is total bullshit because what you should see if you were >>> really looking at the Twin Towers is something like this: >>> <http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5090/1289/1600/Ground%20Zero%20on%209111.jpg> > >>> Where some outside walls of the Twin Towers were standing strong >>> and that only happens if a deep underground nuke vaporized the >>> rest of the buildingand couldn't reach the side furthest from it. >> >> If a nuke is strong enough to "vaporize the rest of the >> building", it wouldn't miss the lower corner of it, > > You are not even trying to think because if they wanted to vaporize > every part of the Twin Towers all they had to do was detonate the nuke > closer to the surface but then that would have blown their cover along > with a > large part of Manhattan Island too. > > It was the fact the nukes were very deep in rock and not directly > under either of the Twin Towers that left the surviving corners of both > the > Twin Towers in the photo above. > > Shit, you are not even an expert on deep underground nukes and yet > now you claim to know all about them. What a bullshitter you are. > > And since you classify as a bullshitter claiming to know how a deep > underground nuke works without any practical experience I can ignore > you too. > > BTW this should help you out: > > Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I > > Rocky there was no 9/11
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 06:54 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) |
| Message-ID | <6499d94a1de0edb8e1083562810aca26@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #272618 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:Be-dnSw1LYyjYlLInZ2dnUU7-XednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:8359b99e1d11d5ef01f8a0ab67305f13@dizum.com... >>>> Sure: >>>> <http://www.cct-seecity.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/030-NYC14204.jpg> >>>> See those tiny people in relation to that huge fucking pile of >>>> rubble towering 15 to 20 stories above them? LOL >>> That is total bullshit because what you should see if you were really >>> looking at the Twin Towers is something like this: >>> <http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5090/1289/1600/Ground%20Zero%20on%209111.jpg> >>> Where some outside walls of the Twin Towers were standing strong >>> and that only happens if a deep underground nuke vaporized the >>> rest of the buildingand couldn't reach the side furthest from it. >> If a nuke is strong enough to "vaporize the rest of the >> building", it wouldn't miss the lower corner of it, Still snipping out all that reality that so shakes your kooky world, eh? LOL > You are not even trying to think because if they wanted to vaporize every > part of the Twin Towers all they had to do was detonate the nuke closer to > the surface but then that would have blown their cover along with a large > part of Manhattan Island too. > > It was the fact the nukes were very deep in rock and not directly under > either of the Twin Towers that left the surviving corners of both the Twin > Towers in the photo above. There is no way a nuke could survive at that depth due to the heat, you idiot. There is no way we can even drill to that depth today, let alone in 1968, you idiot. There is no way the neutron source trigger would last for 33 years and still be viable, you idiot. Hey, did you know I can fart and propel myself to the moon? Yeah, it must be true, you read it on the internet! LOL > Shit, you are not even an expert on deep underground nukes and yet now you > claim to know all about them. What a bullshitter you are. Nor are you. You're stupid enough to think one can bury a nuclear weapon from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the WTC complex (in 1968... and we don't even have the technology to dig that deep today LOL), let it sit for 33 years, and the neutron source trigger would still be viable, and the metal casing of the bomb wouldn't melt. You're the thoroughly mindfucked retard who thinks a 150 kt nuclear detonation is strong enough to produce seismic waves of enough strength to topple buildings, when detonated from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface. You're the nosepicking monobrowed hydrocephalic who believes a 150 kt nuclear weapon wouldn't produce a large enough EMP pulse to blow out all electronics in a radius of several miles. IOW, while I may not be an "expert", I am a genius able to learn information orders of magnitude faster than the average person, whereas you are a brain dead retard just gullible enough to believe everything he reads online, no matter how implausible or impossible it is. Kook. LOL > And since you classify as a bullshitter claiming to know how a deep > underground nuke works without any practical experience I can ignore you > too. Despite the fact that we don't have the technology to drill to 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep even today, let alone in 1968? LOL Despite the fact that anything placed that deep would melt? LOL Despite the fact that the neutron source trigger, after sitting for 33 years, would be so xenon-poisoned that it couldn't trigger anything, let alone a nuclear reaction? LOL > BTW this should help you out: > > Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I > > Rocky You keep shilling for that kook, and it's not helping your cause. There were no nukes at the WTC. You've thus far failed to address the 5 primary reasons why there could be no nukes at the WTC. Do so now. Be sure to provide third-party corroborable proof of your assertions. 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. And that's besides the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. 2) The EMP pulse wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to have burned out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely depleted uranium, used as counterweight in airplanes. So either the planes were switched for 747s, or Boeing lied and was using DU instead of tungsten in the 767s in question. Or the Americium in the smoke detectors was scattered so finely that it was able to quickly decay to a level below background radiation levels, but that'd be beta radiation... you didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take something on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 5) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. Kook. LOL -- Kadaitcha Man (aka HalfADickRick Mather) is an AUK veteran from way back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with that AUK pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda Russo), but ended up booting her to the curb because she's just a cunt hair away from being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a folding cart filled with recyclables so she can afford to buy cat food for herself and her dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given that she now looks like a reject from a zombie slasher flick, has cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck goiters, rotting gums, missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost his better half in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up with Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs have had plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience with gaiety, given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and turned out to be light in the loafers... which limits HalfADickRick's trolling abilities and precludes him laughing at the sissies. So he lost half his dick *and* now has no balls for trolling. "Big things are made out of little things." HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe. Message-ID: <d7419da693ffc53a544d5e1569ac9bfc@dizum.com> "all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e. everywhere at the same time)" Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the very means by which matter came to be formed from energy after the big bang, and most importantly, reality. Message-ID: <9eb660cc06ece30da6a8e7a947a65dfb@dizum.com> HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same thing... he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the statements: 1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because the negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each other." 2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from consciousness." MID: <269e51973939871be9eeaaef420f8a6c@dizum.com> "Who said it's your eyes that see?" HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity. "The Turing test is overrated anyway." HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing test. "The now you experience now simply moves to this now." HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past. Message-ID: <2e6f960b0b8c4a738b1116b41865cb35@dizum.com> HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself: "A fairyboy with an inadequate penis." Message-ID: <d4e79c0adde0074ee812eba8d9023f97@dizum.com> HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic bot he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and able to hold contextually-relevant conversations without any assistance... when challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work producing 5000 intelligent and contextually relevant replies per day to random posts, an easy task for a machine, HalfADickRick started backpedaling, evading and hurling insults. In actuality, he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right alongside it to lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the appearance, because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to tears yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming, fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his otherwise-dumbstruck mouth. <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 15:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmsmqm8.ncv.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org> |
| In reply to | #272303 |
In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:36:13 -0500, Rocky wrote: > usenet.kooks removed No it wasn't. Where's the real rocky and why are you impersonating him? -- PJR :-) τὸν οἰόμενον νόον ἔχειν ὁ νουθετέων ματαιοπονεῖ. - Democritus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 10:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3035293788f3be9698ab6e@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #272303 |
In article <i8qdnQypgMkHxFbInZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com>, wookiee@att.net says... > > usenet.kooks removed > > "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" > <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net... > > Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message > > <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > > > >> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... > >>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>> > >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110 > >>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners > >>>>>>> and in the case of the North Tower leave Survivors in Stairwell > >>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just happened to be the > >>>>>>> furthest from the hypocenters. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be > >>>>>> capitalized, > >>>>>> lunatic boi? > >>>>> > >>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking? > >>>> > >>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be > >>>> capitalized, lunatic boi? > >>>> > >>>> It is a symptom of mental illness. > >>>> > >>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. > >>>>> > >>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required specially > >>>>> treated water to be spayed on them. > >>>> > >>>> You really are quite insane. > >>> > >>> > >>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you > >>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity? > >> > >> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell you it > >> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did after the > >> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of what looked > >> like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. Those poor drivers > >> probably got a lot more radiation than they bargained for. > > > > If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k. > > ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was a great big hoax > is compare the bullshit stories from the media to reality. > > Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not be brought down > by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media wants you to believe. > > Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles than a "Controlled > Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear Controlled Demolition. > > After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height of the Surviving Walls and > Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly where the underground nuke > was detonated because the shortest walls will be closest to the detonation. > > And in the case of the Twin Towers neither of the underground nukes was > detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of the surviving walls > and height of the surviving corners places the deep underground nukes under > WTC3 and WTC4. > > Rocky So you're a structural engineer and a demolitions expert? -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7cqnsa924s5vujto4a60ds51k7disa1svk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #272303 |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:36:13 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>usenet.kooks removed
>
No it wasn't.
>"4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid"
><nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:8m6brk.1rd.19.1@news.alt.net...
>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote in message
>> <-qednQcq-JC1xFXInZ2dnUU7-XGdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
>>
>>> "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com...
>>>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>,
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110
>>>>>>>> story buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners
>>>>>>>> and in the case of the North Tower leave Survivors in Stairwell
>>>>>>>> B. Especially when those surviving parts just happened to be the
>>>>>>>> furthest from the hypocenters.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be
>>>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So now you have to resort to nitpicking?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be
>>>>> capitalized, lunatic boi?
>>>>>
>>>>> It is a symptom of mental illness.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There were three hypocenters and they all required specially
>>>>>> treated water to be spayed on them.
>>>>>
>>>>> You really are quite insane.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you
>>>> treat water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity?
>>>
>>> I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell you it
>>> didn't start there either. The very first thing they did after the
>>> Great 9/11 hoax was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of what looked
>>> like very black dirt to fill in the hypocenters. Those poor drivers
>>> probably got a lot more radiation than they bargained for.
>>
>> If there's a hoax, it's the one you're plying, netko0k.
>
>ROTFLMAO because all anybody has to do to see that 9/11 was a great big hoax
>is compare the bullshit stories from the media to reality.
>
And yet, almost 14 years later, there is no evidence of this.
Odd that.
>Buildings way to tall for a "Controlled Demolition" can not be brought down
>by a thud and a diesel fuel fire as the media wants you to believe.
>
Since fuel alone is not claimed as the cause, your deception
fails.
>Buildings that leave much smaller debris piles than a "Controlled
>Demolition" would leave indicate they were a Nuclear Controlled Demolition.
>
>After a Nuclear Controlled Demolition the height of the Surviving Walls and
>Surviving Corners can be used to indicate exactly where the underground nuke
>was detonated because the shortest walls will be closest to the detonation.
>
And yet, no such detonation occurred, as proved by the links
you've provided.
>And in the case of the Twin Towers neither of the underground nukes was
>detonated under the Twin Towers because the height of the surviving walls
>and height of the surviving corners places the deep underground nukes under
>WTC3 and WTC4.
Not so. But do continue to spew this lie. You're going to, so I
may as well make it appear as if I want you to, even if no one else
does. This will allow you a means to rationalize your continued
posting of the same well documented lie.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <m2sgsapa3fqgok7idk914dk2e83auirpbu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #272119 |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 02:55:54 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com...
>> In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110 story
>>> >>> buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners and in the
>>> >>> case
>>> >>> of the North Tower leave Survivors in Stairwell B. Especially when
>>> >>> those
>>> >>> surviving parts just happened to be the furthest from the
>>> >>> hypocenters.
>>> >>
>>> >> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be
>>> >> capitalized, lunatic boi?
>>> >
>>> > So now you have to resort to nitpicking?
>>>
>>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be capitalized,
>>> lunatic boi?
>>>
>>> It is a symptom of mental illness.
>>>
>>> >> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi.
>>> >
>>> > There were three hypocenters and they all required specially treated
>>> > water
>>> > to be spayed on them.
>>>
>>> You really are quite insane.
>>
>>
>> "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you treat
>> water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity?
>
>I don't know the whole story behind it but I can also tell you it didn't
>start there either. The very first thing they did after the Great 9/11 hoax
>was bring in over 100 dump trucks full of what looked like very black dirt
>to fill in the hypocenters. Those poor drivers probably got a lot more
>radiation than they bargained for.
There were no hypocenters.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <i2sgsat2t4qvt8mjfg22trvqclar2nnedp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #272116 |
On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 22:31:04 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
<hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>> > news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110 story
>> >>> buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners and in the
>> >>> case
>> >>> of the North Tower leave Survivors in Stairwell B. Especially when those
>> >>> surviving parts just happened to be the furthest from the hypocenters.
>> >>
>> >> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be capitalized,
>> >> lunatic boi?
>> >
>> > So now you have to resort to nitpicking?
>>
>> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be capitalized,
>> lunatic boi?
>>
>> It is a symptom of mental illness.
>>
>> >> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi.
>> >
>> > There were three hypocenters and they all required specially treated water
>> > to be spayed on them.
>>
>> You really are quite insane.
>
>
>"specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you treat
>water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity?
That's one of the MANY items Rocky simply made up.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 08:48 -0500 |
| Subject | 2 Jeanne Douglas (was: Nuke Em) |
| Message-ID | <_qGdnVcgSbXHUkTInZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #272116 |
"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message news:hlwdjsd2-7E21BD.22310409082015@news.giganews.com... > In article <6mcl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > wrote: > >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> > >> > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> > news:eq6l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Whatever. BTW I'm still waiting for you to prove that two 110 story >> >>> buildings will leave Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners and in the >> >>> case >> >>> of the North Tower leave Survivors in Stairwell B. Especially when >> >>> those >> >>> surviving parts just happened to be the furthest from the >> >>> hypocenters. >> >> >> >> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be >> >> capitalized, >> >> lunatic boi? >> > >> > So now you have to resort to nitpicking? >> >> Why do you continue to capitalize things that should not be capitalized, >> lunatic boi? >> >> It is a symptom of mental illness. >> >> >> There was no hypocenter, lunatic boi. >> > >> > There were three hypocenters and they all required specially treated >> > water >> > to be spayed on them. >> >> You really are quite insane. > > > "specially treated water"?????? Wat the fuck is that? How do you treat > water to completely eliminate all traces of radioactivity? Who says all traces of radioactivity from Ground Zero were removed? Certainly not the videos of Geiger counters going off or the people that died trying to conceal the fact Ground Zero was the site of not just one nuclear detonation but 34 or more nukes where 31 nukes were used just to make a weird shaped hole in WTC6. See: https://donaldfox.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/potentialplacementofverylowyieldminineutronnukes.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 16:53 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas |
| Message-ID | <9dapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #273407 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Who says all traces of radioactivity from Ground Zero were removed? > Certainly not the videos of Geiger counters going off or the people that > died trying to conceal the fact Ground Zero was the site of not just one > nuclear detonation but 34 or more nukes where 31 nukes were used just to > make a weird shaped hole in WTC6. See: When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 12:23 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas |
| Message-ID | <TZedncuDHZZNgEfInZ2dnUVZ5rCdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #273433 |
wrote in message news:9dapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Who says all traces of radioactivity from Ground Zero were removed? > Certainly not the videos of Geiger counters going off or the people > that > died trying to conceal the fact Ground Zero was the site of not just > one > nuclear detonation but 34 or more nukes where 31 nukes were used > just to > make a weird shaped hole in WTC6. See: When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino *** You are one cruel dude, Jim ... don't you know that logic escapes these morons ... he lives and breathes this Nuclear 9/11 Brainfartery ... and now you want to destroy that mental midget's raison d'etre ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 15:01 -0500 |
| Subject | Proving Hägar is a sack of shit (was: 2 Jeanne Douglas) |
| Message-ID | <oP-dnS7b7riDu0fInZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #273487 |
"Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:TZedncuDHZZNgEfInZ2dnUVZ5rCdnZ2d@giganews.com... > > > wrote in message news:9dapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> Who says all traces of radioactivity from Ground Zero were removed? >> Certainly not the videos of Geiger counters going off or the people that >> died trying to conceal the fact Ground Zero was the site of not just one >> nuclear detonation but 34 or more nukes where 31 nukes were used just to >> make a weird shaped hole in WTC6. See: > > When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic > signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. Even the 31 smaller nukes they used on WTC6? (link in post you replied to) I doubt that because even looking at the seismic readings proves there is always something going on. See: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Now I know you are a lying sack of shit. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Proving Hägar is a sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <mrdaj9$hn4$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #273494 |
On 23/08/2015 21:01, Rocky wrote: > "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:TZedncuDHZZNgEfInZ2dnUVZ5rCdnZ2d@giganews.com... >> >> >> wrote in message news:9dapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> Who says all traces of radioactivity from Ground Zero were removed? >>> Certainly not the videos of Geiger counters going off or the people that >>> died trying to conceal the fact Ground Zero was the site of not just one >>> nuclear detonation but 34 or more nukes where 31 nukes were used just to >>> make a weird shaped hole in WTC6. See: >> >> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic >> signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. > > Even the 31 smaller nukes they used on WTC6? (link in post you replied to) > > I doubt that because even looking at the seismic readings proves there is > always something going on. See: > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html > > Now I know you are a lying sack of shit. > > Rocky > > Yes, your link says a seismic event 0f 2.3, nowhere does it mention a nuclear event. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-24 02:16 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Proving H㦡r is a sack of shit |
| Message-ID | <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #273494 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:oP-dnS7b7riDu0fInZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "H㦡r" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:TZedncuDHZZNgEfInZ2dnUVZ5rCdnZ2d@giganews.com... >> wrote in message news:9dapac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> Who<SMACKAKOOK!> Retards are taught through repeated application of clue-stick to shut their stupidity-spewing pieholes. Kook. LOL >> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic >> signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. > Even the 31 smaller nukes they used on WTC6? (link in post you replied to) Which brings your total to 65 nuclear weapons total... but you're not an insane nutter off his meds, right? Kook. LOL > <SMACKAKOOK!> Retards with broken brains that keep expanding their kooky conspiracy theory beyond any sane limits don't get to open their stupid fucking gobs and blather out their droolery, you fuckwit. Shut it. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes)... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 28 of 38 — ← Prev page 1 … 26 27 [28] 29 30 … 38 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web