Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #313617 > unrolled thread
| Started by | a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-10 18:51 -0700 |
| Last post | 2026-08-14 02:30 -0400 |
| Articles | 19 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> - 2026-08-10 18:51 -0700
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> - 2026-08-11 09:04 -0400
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment Stephen Harding <smharding@verizon.net> - 2026-08-12 14:49 -0400
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> - 2026-08-12 18:16 -0400
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment Daniel <me@fuhgitabutit.com> - 2026-08-11 15:46 -0700
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> - 2026-08-11 20:51 -0400
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> - 2026-08-11 21:15 -0400
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-08-12 02:35 +0000
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> - 2026-08-12 08:10 -0400
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> - 2026-08-12 08:37 -0400
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment Daniel <me@fuhgitabutit.com> - 2026-08-13 15:20 -0700
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> - 2026-08-13 19:46 -0400
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment Daniel <me@fuhgitabutit.com> - 2026-08-13 19:43 -0700
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> - 2026-08-14 08:19 -0400
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> - 2026-08-14 12:46 -0400
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-08-14 00:12 +0000
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a quest "Phigan" <phigan@mutinybbs.com.remove-51d-this> - 2026-08-14 02:33 -0400
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment Daniel <me@fuhgitabutit.com> - 2026-08-12 14:02 -0700
Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a quest "Phigan" <phigan@mutinybbs.com.remove-51d-this> - 2026-08-14 02:30 -0400
| From | a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-10 18:51 -0700 |
| Subject | send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment |
| Message-ID | <reveS.79058$syk8.2990@fx36.iad> |
from https://spacedaily.com/t-a-real-group-of-scientists-and-engineers-spent-two-days-in-boulder-this-june-asking-what-it-would-actually-take-to-send-humans-to-titan-and-their-honest-answer-was-that-it-isnt-a-question-of-physics/ A real group of scientists and engineers spent two days in Boulder this June asking what it would actually take to send humans to Titan, and their honest answer was that it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment The greatest obstacle to reaching Saturn's moon isn't overcoming the laws of physics—it's summoning the decades of sustained will and innovation that any human mission would demand. By Lachlan Brown Published August 10, 2026 · How we edit A real group of scientists and engineers spent two days in Boulder this June asking what it would actually take to send humans to Titan, and their honest answer was that it isn't a question of physics, it's a question of time, technology and commitment Illustration of Titan. Photo by Zelch Csaba via Pexels. Iwrote last week about the strange fact that Titan is the one place beyond Earth where a person could stand outside without a pressure suit, even though the surface sits at roughly minus 179 degrees Celsius. I left that fact sitting there at the time, mostly as a curiosity. It’s worth actually following where it leads, because it turns out a real group of scientists and engineers spent two days in Boulder, Colorado this June doing exactly that. What makes Titan genuinely unusual as a destination The case for Titan starts with the same detail I keep coming back to: its atmosphere is denser than Earth’s, made mostly of nitrogen, and that thickness does real protective work. It shields the surface from a meaningful amount of cosmic radiation, which is one of the harder problems for any long duration human mission. That’s a genuinely different profile from the one I wrote about for Mars, where a NASA-funded study concluded the planet cannot be terraformed with current technology, leaving anyone there sealed against near vacuum, deep cold and steady radiation. Titan swaps one set of problems for another. No pressure suit, but serious insulation against the cold. Less radiation exposure, but an atmosphere thick enough that flying through it, by aircraft or hovercraft, becomes remarkably efficient compared with the thin air on Mars. Titan also has abundant local chemistry to work with. Its methane, ethane and nitrogen aren’t just scenery, they’re potential feedstock for fuel production, which matters enormously for a destination this far from home. Editors’ Recommendations A tonne of old phones holds more gold than a tonne of gold ore. Each handset carries traces of gold, silver and copper, concentrated enough that recycling them, so-called urban mining, pulls more gold per tonne than an actual mine. The summit’s agenda went well beyond atmosphere and fuel. Sessions covered spacesuit design suited to Titan’s specific cold and chemistry, habitat concepts, power generation, and how people might actually move around once they got there, alongside the environmental hazards particular to the place, things like tholins, the organic compounds that give Titan’s atmosphere its orange haze. Titan’s weather runs on hydrocarbons rather than water: methane rain, rivers and lakes, seasonal flooding, and winds that behave differently than anything in a water based climate. Every one of those is an operational headache for a future mission and, at the same time, a reason scientists find the place worth the trouble. The actual case made in Boulder this June The event was called the Humans to Titan Summit, held on 11 and 12 June at the Southwest Research Institute, and it was the first meeting built entirely around the question of what it would take to send people there. Amanda Hendrix, president of the nonprofit Explore Titan and director of the Planetary Science Institute, told Space.com that the point wasn’t to pretend a mission was imminent. It was to normalise the idea early enough that it could sustain momentum across generations of researchers. “The top reason in my mind that Titan is such a good spot for humans is the dense atmosphere,” she said, which tracks with everything I’d already found interesting about the place. Editors’ Recommendations The asteroid that ended the dinosaur age struck Mexico’s Yucatán Peninsula about 66 million years ago, and the sulphur-rich rocks beneath it helped turn a roughly 10-kilometre object into a global climate disaster Fifty kilometres above Venus, pressure and temperature become surprisingly Earth-like and ordinary breathable air could keep a habitat afloat, but living there would mean building a sealed world inside sulphuric-acid clouds The Artful Age Scot Rafkin, who directs the Department of Space Studies at the Southwest Research Institute, offered a more measured framing of the challenge. In his view, sending people to Titan doesn’t run up against any law of physics. What stands in the way is simply the scale of engineering effort required, and how long it will take, and how much anyone is willing to invest in it. He added that the major science and technical gaps are already reasonably well mapped out, even if closing them will still take decades. What has to happen before any of this Every serious version of this plan runs through robotic missions first, and the nearest one is the mission I wrote about a few days ago: Dragonfly, the nuclear powered rotorcraft NASA approved to fly from site to site across Titan’s surface. It’s currently planned to launch no earlier than 2028, and given what I found when I looked into just how far Titan actually is and how much that distance varies depending on where Earth and Saturn sit in their orbits, it isn’t hard to see why the cruise alone takes roughly six years. Once Dragonfly arrives, it’s expected to spend more than three years hopping between sites, and whatever it finds about surface composition, weather, and chemistry will feed directly into any future habitat and landing system design, long before a human crew is a realistic conversation. What I’d take from this I don’t think anyone at that summit believes a crewed Titan mission is close, and none of what I’ve read suggests they were pretending otherwise. What struck me is the specific shape of the optimism. It wasn’t “we could do this soon.” It was closer to Rafkin’s framing: most of the hard problems are at least legible now, and legible problems are the kind that get solved eventually, on a timeline nobody currently knows. That’s a fairly humble thing to build a two-day conference around, and I found I liked it more for that reason, not less. Free guide from Space Daily The Universe in 12 Numbers Twelve figures that put your place in the cosmos into staggering perspective — with real imagery from NASA, Hubble & Webb. Pop in your email and we’ll send you the free PDF.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-11 09:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <115f6ka$t9r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #313617 |
"a425couple" wrote in message news:reveS.79058$syk8.2990@fx36.iad... from https://spacedaily.com/t-a-real-group-of-scientists-and-engineers-spent-two-days-in-boulder-this-june-asking-what-it-would-actually-take-to-send-humans-to-titan-and-their-honest-answer-was-that-it-isnt-a-question-of-physics/ ------------------------------- We are at a level of hardware development when money and support instead of technology limit what we can do. Civilization has been here before, for the Romans, the West before the Renaissance, the Industrial Revolution (1800) and toward 1900, just before AC electricity and gas engines enabled great leaps in transportation. In many ways we were no more advanced in 1800 than the Romans, and considerably behind in public water and sewer utilities. https://conversableeconomist.com/2015/10/19/exonerating-henry-ellsworth-and-charles-duell-former-u-s-commissioners-of-patents/ Airliners today are little different from the 707 of the 50's, and slower. Military jet speed hasn't improved since the 60's, it has actually fallen from Mach 3 to below Mach 2. General aviation still follows the plan of the Spirit of St Louis and Curtiss Robin. Cars of the 50's and 60's could have everything they needed, PS, PB, AT, A/C etc. Regulations on emissions and fuel economy forced them to become electronic but Model Ts and As show up at the diner on Cruise Night. The phone system still accepts mechanical rotary dialing. Manually operated machine tools are nearly identical to those of WW1. Hand carpentry tools have changed little since Jesus learned them from Joseph. I've been forming car rust repair panels with similar tools as a medieval armor maker. I'm aware of the advances, in fact I contributed to some such as color printing and cell phone digital radios. Almost all of it depended on improvements in the density of integrated circuit photo etch masks, which enabled growing computer complexity. A considerable amount of what we have now was born as concepts in or around the 1930's, such as computers, antibiotics, jets, radar, plastics, nuclear power etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Harding <smharding@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-12 14:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <115if7g$121h9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #313618 |
On 8/11/26 9:04 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote: > > electronic but Model Ts and As show up at the diner on Cruise Night. The > phone system still accepts mechanical rotary dialing. Manually operated I have an old phone with separate speaker and receiver (like in the 1920s and 30's). It has no rotary dial to dial a number. You just used to have to hit the interrupt a few times to get "Martha" the switchboard operator, to place the call number you wanted. I was able to use it when I hooked it up to my old computer that had dial capability (when you had to dial up the modem to contact to whomever) and the call would be completed. People said I sounded like I was talking in a tunnel, which I sort of was (the speaker of the phone with the big cup to capture your voice). Old technology working on more modern infrastructure. Not sure you can do that any more. Probably can add rotary dialing app to your computer but who would want to? SMH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-12 18:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <115irbe$163g4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #313627 |
"Stephen Harding" wrote in message news:115if7g$121h9$1@dont-email.me... On 8/11/26 9:04 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote: > ...The phone system still accepts mechanical rotary dialing. I have an old phone with separate speaker and receiver (like in the 1920s and 30's). It has no rotary dial to dial a number. You just used to have to hit the interrupt a few times to get "Martha" the switchboard operator, to place the call number you wanted. I was able to use it when I hooked it up to my old computer that had dial capability (when you had to dial up the modem to contact to whomever) and the call would be completed. People said I sounded like I was talking in a tunnel, which I sort of was (the speaker of the phone with the big cup to capture your voice). Old technology working on more modern infrastructure. Not sure you can do that any more. Probably can add rotary dialing app to your computer but who would want to? SMH --------------------------------------- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strowger_switch I took a night class in the telephone system, including cellular. The instructor said the wife of the town's other undertaker was the phone operator. The Japanese used a stepping relay module from the phone switching system in their diplomatic secret code machine. Without ever seeing one the American assigned to build a test version happened to choose the same device. https://www.nsa.gov/history/national-cryptologic-museum/exhibits-artifacts/exhibit-view/article/2718925/the-magic-of-purple/ The Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 allowed Japan 3/5ths as many battleships as the US because we had broken the coded message to the negotiator that set that minimum. They assumed half our force would be in the Atlantic and they would still have an initial advantage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel <me@fuhgitabutit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-11 15:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <874ih0numc.fsf@rpi3> |
| In reply to | #313617 |
a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> writes: > from > https://spacedaily.com/t-a-real-group-of-scientists-and-engineers-spent-two-days-in-boulder-this-june-asking-what-it-would-actually-take-to-send-humans-to-titan-and-their-honest-answer-was-that-it-isnt-a-question-of-physics/ Whoever funded this clearly had cash to burn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-11 20:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <115gg24$eeok$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #313619 |
"Daniel" wrote in message news:874ih0numc.fsf@rpi3... a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> writes: > from > https://spacedaily.com/t-a-real-group-of-scientists-and-engineers-spent-two-days-in-boulder-this-june-asking-what-it-would-actually-take-to-send-humans-to-titan-and-their-honest-answer-was-that-it-isnt-a-question-of-physics/ Whoever funded this clearly had cash to burn. -------------------------------------------------- That's a waste. The Titan mission will be crewed by non-humanoid AI robots immune to the environment and able to crawl, swim or fly as appropriate. We already have them on Mars. There is plenty of less challenging uninhabited land on Earth. https://study.com/learn/lesson/desert-geographic-location-formation.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-11 21:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <115gheu$epq4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #313620 |
"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news:115gg24$eeok$1@dont-email.me... >..The Titan mission will be crewed by non-humanoid AI robots immune to the environment and able to crawl, swim or fly as appropriate. ------------------------------------- The hand is our only physical advantage over other life forms, and we are losing it to robots. https://clonerobotics.com/hand Why not a symmetrical hand with thumbs on both sides?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-12 02:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <115gm61$1ecj$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #313620 |
In alt.astronomy Jim Wilkins <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote: > "Daniel" wrote in message news:874ih0numc.fsf@rpi3... > a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> writes: >> from >> https://spacedaily.com/t-a-real-group-of-scientists-and-engineers-spent-two-days-in-boulder-this-june-asking-what-it-would-actually-take-to-send-humans-to-titan-and-their-honest-answer-was-that-it-isnt-a-question-of-physics/ > Whoever funded this clearly had cash to burn. > -------------------------------------------------- I think dont take this news item that literally. AFAIK it was training in thinking about hard problems. I can imagine if we've had a couple decades of picking all the low fruit it's time to put some pressure on, even if it's only in play, and get ready to change societal gears because the problems are only gunna pile up from here on. > That's a waste. The Titan mission will be crewed by non-humanoid AI robots > immune to the environment and able to crawl, swim or fly as appropriate. We > already have them on Mars. If the plan is to have more than one planet in the system with people on in just in case some calamity happens, then you cant send a robot to do that for you. > There is plenty of less challenging uninhabited land on Earth. > https://study.com/learn/lesson/desert-geographic-location-formation.html -- We do these things not because they are easy. -- Some guy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-12 08:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <115hnqk$ptjm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #313622 |
"R Kym Horsell" wrote in message news:115gm61$1ecj$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com... If the plan is to have more than one planet in the system with people on in just in case some calamity happens, then you cant send a robot to do that for you. -------------------------------- Robots could prepare a heated inhabitable base. I've lived outdoors in winter snow without heat in the Army and camping here in New Hampshire. We are very limited without warm hands. A screw fumbled and dropped in the snow can be lost until spring. A calamity on Earth would cut off their support. Unless we can terraform an area on Mars sufficiently to be self-sustaining we would only strand the settlers there to die. Our polar installations here can't survive without resupply. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pituffik_Space_Base At best they would be reduced to harpooning seals and whales for food and clothing. Explorer Vilhjalmur Stefansson spent an arctic winter living with the Inuit and eating nothing but boiled fish. Explorers who scorned their uncivilized lifestyle died. I've read that we can live indefinitely on meat as long as it contains some fat; rabbit may not. It must be cooked to kill tularemia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin%27s_lost_expedition After the dust settles and sky clears enough to let weed seeds sprout they would need to be able to return with enough supplies to recolonize a barren and possibly toxic or radioactive Earth. The Pilgrims didn't and half died the first winter. They were lucky to meet Squanto who spoke English and showed them how to farm the poor soil here. The first Virginia colonists vanished. Squanto had been kidnapped by an associate of Roanoke's John Smith and taken to Spain, where priests bought and freed him and he found work in a London shipyard, then became a sailor and guide. European disease caught from fishermen had killed his village and the Pilgrims offered help to defend against their enemies. The scenario is worth thinking about but we are far from ready to invest in preparations. AI robots able to maintain tech with extremely cold bare fingers may be essential.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-12 08:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <115hpdq$qerv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #313625 |
"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news:115hnqk$ptjm$1@dont-email.me... > AI robots able to maintain tech with extremely cold bare fingers may be essential. --------------------------------------------- Google AI: "Astronauts working on International Space Station (ISS) solar arrays often face intense challenges handling tiny bolts, specialized fasteners, and structural mounting hardware while wearing bulky pressurized space suit gloves. Small hardware elements like bolts and brackets require specialized tethered tools, pistol-grip power tools, and extreme patience during spacewalks (EVAs)." The M2.5 screws that retain a laptop hard drive are examples of the small hardware that must be handled for essential maintenance. Current NVMe drives still have one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel <me@fuhgitabutit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-13 15:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <87se4h64sr.fsf@rpi3> |
| In reply to | #313622 |
R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> writes: > In alt.astronomy Jim Wilkins <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote: >> "Daniel" wrote in message news:874ih0numc.fsf@rpi3... >> a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> writes: >>> from >>> https://spacedaily.com/t-a-real-group-of-scientists-and-engineers-spent-two-days-in-boulder-this-june-asking-what-it-would-actually-take-to-send-humans-to-titan-and-their-honest-answer-was-that-it-isnt-a-question-of-physics/ >> Whoever funded this clearly had cash to burn. >> -------------------------------------------------- > > I think dont take this news item that literally. AFAIK it was training > in thinking about hard problems. > I can imagine if we've had a couple decades of picking all the low fruit > it's time to put some pressure on, even if it's only in play, and get > ready to change societal gears because the problems are only gunna pile > up from here on. > >> That's a waste. The Titan mission will be crewed by non-humanoid AI robots >> immune to the environment and able to crawl, swim or fly as appropriate. We >> already have them on Mars. > > If the plan is to have more than one planet in the system with people on > in just in case some calamity happens, then you cant send a robot to > do that for you. What calamity would necessitate sending a human population to Mars? What problem would it solve? Pretend the endeavor can be done today for the sake of thought experiment. This is not a challenge to your statement, just having conversation. -- Daniel sysop | air & wave bbs finger | info@bbs.airandwave.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-13 19:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <115lkvr$234jp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #313634 |
"Daniel" wrote in message news:87se4h64sr.fsf@rpi3... R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> writes: > > If the plan is to have more than one planet in the system with people on > in just in case some calamity happens, then you cant send a robot to > do that for you. What calamity would necessitate sending a human population to Mars? What problem would it solve? Pretend the endeavor can be done today for the sake of thought experiment. This is not a challenge to your statement, just having conversation. Daniel --------------------------------- Likely a human presence on Mars would be a small, highly qualified selected group, like South Pole researchers, submarine or ISS crews. A study of the personalities of explorers et al. might reveal something of the traits they would bring back to resettle a devastated Earth. Here's one: https://www.16personalities.com/articles/roles-explorers Google AI: "In the TV show Angel (Season 5, Episode 15, "A Hole in the World"), Angel and Spike famously spend over 40 minutes arguing over whether cavemen or unarmed astronauts would win in a physical fight. Spike argues that raw primal savagery and survival instincts give cavemen the absolute win, while Angel defends the intelligence, size, and teamwork of astronauts." That may have been a debate from a writers' meeting salvaged into a script. I think the outcome depends on whether the cavemen or astronauts could win the support of other tribes, which is how Cortez and Pizarro defeated powerful empires. Lewis and Clark avoided hostility by demonstrating a high capacity assault rifle to the natives. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/lewis-and-clarks-girandoni-air-rifle/ "At village after village, the small band of 38 explorers was allowed to pass safely without a single casualty through some of the most hostile and warlike peoples on earth." It's possible the Girandoni was Thomas Jefferson's.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel <me@fuhgitabutit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-13 19:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <87ecg18ls3.fsf@rpi3> |
| In reply to | #313635 |
"Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes: > "Daniel" wrote in message news:87se4h64sr.fsf@rpi3... > > R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> writes: > >> >> If the plan is to have more than one planet in the system with people on >> in just in case some calamity happens, then you cant send a robot to >> do that for you. > > What calamity would necessitate sending a human population to Mars? What > problem would it solve? Pretend the endeavor can be done today for the > sake of thought experiment. > > This is not a challenge to your statement, just having conversation. > Daniel > > --------------------------------- > > Likely a human presence on Mars would be a small, highly qualified > selected group, like South Pole researchers, submarine or ISS crews. A > study of the personalities of explorers et al. might reveal something > of the traits they would bring back to resettle a devastated Earth. In my opinion, Mars is out of reach for human colonization. Our best bet is the moon, and people could be ferried in and out like we do with the ISS. -- Daniel sysop | air & wave bbs finger | info@bbs.airandwave.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-14 08:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <115n13u$2h4cr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #313637 |
"Daniel" wrote in message news:87ecg18ls3.fsf@rpi3... In my opinion, Mars is out of reach for human colonization. Our best bet is the moon, and people could be ferried in and out like we do with the ISS. Daniel --------------------------- Our ionosphere prevents us from receiving long wave radio signals and a dish antenna large enough for them is impractical for satellites. They require only the simplest technology to transmit and receive and are excellent candidates for alien transmissions if any are to be found. This project enables searching in an obvious but currently inaccessible frequency band for what we may be missing. https://www.nasa.gov/general/lunar-crater-radio-telescope-lcrt-on-the-far-side-of-the-moon/ An orbiting satellite could collect and relay the data back to Earth. Perhaps aliens just received the distress call from MGY (Titanic) and are coming to the rescue, or to observe our entry into technology. Or to conquer the primitives and exploit their new discovery as we did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-14 12:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <115ngon$2mnj6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #313643 |
"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news:115n13u$2h4cr$1@dont-email.me... "Daniel" wrote in message news:87ecg18ls3.fsf@rpi3... In my opinion, Mars is out of reach for human colonization. Our best bet is the moon, and people could be ferried in and out like we do with the ISS. Daniel ----------------------------------- https://www.nasa.gov/general/lunar-crater-radio-telescope-lcrt-on-the-far-side-of-the-moon/ I strongly suspect that such an engineering project would benefit from or require human assistance to troubleshoot and solve unexpected problems such as snagged or tangled cables, dirt in connectors or soil unsuited for anchors. As a project of noncritical and limited scope it could provide experience for a mission to construct a permanent habitat whether it succeeds or fails. However a good location for it may not be accessible from a base near the South Pole. https://www.nasa.gov/moonbase/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-14 00:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <115lmhc$1sk3$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| In reply to | #313634 |
In alt.astronomy Daniel <me@fuhgitabutit.com> wrote: > R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> writes: > >> In alt.astronomy Jim Wilkins <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote: >>> "Daniel" wrote in message news:874ih0numc.fsf@rpi3... >>> a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> writes: >>>> from >>>> https://spacedaily.com/t-a-real-group-of-scientists-and-engineers-spent-two-days-in-boulder-this-june-asking-what-it-would-actually-take-to-send-humans-to-titan-and-their-honest-answer-was-that-it-isnt-a-question-of-physics/ >>> Whoever funded this clearly had cash to burn. >>> -------------------------------------------------- >> I think dont take this news item that literally. AFAIK it was training >> in thinking about hard problems. >> I can imagine if we've had a couple decades of picking all the low fruit >> it's time to put some pressure on, even if it's only in play, and get >> ready to change societal gears because the problems are only gunna pile >> up from here on. >>> That's a waste. The Titan mission will be crewed by non-humanoid AI robots >>> immune to the environment and able to crawl, swim or fly as appropriate. We >>> already have them on Mars. >> If the plan is to have more than one planet in the system with people on >> in just in case some calamity happens, then you cant send a robot to >> do that for you. > What calamity would necessitate sending a human population to Mars? What ... Sommin like SL9 but aimed at Earth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Phigan" <phigan@mutinybbs.com.remove-51d-this> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-14 02:33 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a quest |
| Message-ID | <6A7EB6A4.5017.usenet_astro@mutinybbs.com> |
| In reply to | #313622 |
Re: Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a quest By: R Kym Horsell to alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.military,alt.economics,ca.politics,fl.politics on Wed Aug 12 2026 02:35:45 > We do these things not because they are easy. > -- Some guy "but because we _thought_ they would be easy." --- Synchronet 3.16c-Win32 NewsLink 1.103 MutinyBBS - telnet : mutinybbs.com:2332 - ssh : mutinybbs.com:2232
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel <me@fuhgitabutit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-12 14:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <87zeyrm4rq.fsf@rpi3> |
| In reply to | #313620 |
"Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes: > "Daniel" wrote in message news:874ih0numc.fsf@rpi3... > > a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> writes: > >> from >> https://spacedaily.com/t-a-real-group-of-scientists-and-engineers-spent-two-days-in-boulder-this-june-asking-what-it-would-actually-take-to-send-humans-to-titan-and-their-honest-answer-was-that-it-isnt-a-question-of-physics/ > > Whoever funded this clearly had cash to burn. > -------------------------------------------------- > > That's a waste. The Titan mission will be crewed by non-humanoid AI > robots immune to the environment and able to crawl, swim or fly as > appropriate. We already have them on Mars. > > There is plenty of less challenging uninhabited land on Earth. > https://study.com/learn/lesson/desert-geographic-location-formation.html Far more realistic to send bots. But sending humans? psh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Phigan" <phigan@mutinybbs.com.remove-51d-this> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-14 02:30 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a quest |
| Message-ID | <6A7EB617.5016.usenet_astro@mutinybbs.com> |
| In reply to | #313619 |
Re: Re: send humans to Titan, it isn't a question of physics, it's a quest By: Daniel to alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.military,alt.economics,ca.politics,fl.politics on Tue Aug 11 2026 15:46:19 > > https://spacedaily.com/t-a-real-group-of-scientists-and-engineers-spent-tw > > Whoever funded this clearly had cash to burn. They could probably make a cool movie out of everything that came out of there. That'd make some of it back ;). --- Synchronet 3.16c-Win32 NewsLink 1.103 MutinyBBS - telnet : mutinybbs.com:2332 - ssh : mutinybbs.com:2232
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web