Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #290933 > unrolled thread

Killer asteroids

Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy

Contents

  Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-25 09:46 -0700
    Re: Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-27 13:50 -0700
      Re: Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-27 13:58 -0700
        Re: Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-27 21:17 -0700
      Re: Killer asteroids Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-05-28 08:14 -0500
        Re: Killer asteroids "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2017-05-28 13:23 -0400
          Re: Killer asteroids Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-28 20:28 +0200
            Re: Killer asteroids Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-05-28 13:00 -0600
              Re: Killer asteroids Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-29 01:03 +0200
            Re: Killer asteroids Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-28 16:17 -0500
              Re: Killer asteroids Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-29 01:12 +0200
          Re: Killer asteroids Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-05-29 07:23 -0500
        Re: Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-28 11:15 -0700
          Re: Killer asteroids Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-05-29 07:38 -0500
        Re: Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-29 10:54 -0700
          Re: Killer asteroids Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-05-29 18:14 -0500
            Re: Killer asteroids Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2017-05-29 19:25 -0600
              Re: Killer asteroids jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-30 02:37 +0000
              Re: Killer asteroids Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-30 14:08 +0200
                Re: Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-30 10:35 -0700
                  Re: Killer asteroids 21blackswan@gmail.com - 2017-05-30 11:22 -0700
                  Re: Killer asteroids Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-31 00:39 +0200
                    Re: Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-30 16:14 -0700
                      Re: Killer asteroids Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-31 22:17 +0200
                        Re: Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-31 13:52 -0700
                          Re: Killer asteroids Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-01 02:12 +0200
            Re: Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-29 22:35 -0700
              Re: Killer asteroids Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-05-30 17:01 -0500
                Re: Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-30 15:43 -0700
                  Re: Killer asteroids The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-30 17:08 -0700
    Re: Killer asteroids tesla sTinker <truecatholicstaff@truecarpentry.org> - 2017-05-28 20:40 -0700
      Re: Killer asteroids Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-29 06:59 +0200
        Re: Killer asteroids tesla sTinker <truecatholicstaff@truecarpentry.org> - 2017-05-29 21:29 -0700
          Re: Killer asteroids benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-30 17:01 -0400
        Re: Killer asteroids tesla sTinker <truecatholicstaff@truecarpentry.org> - 2017-05-29 21:52 -0700
    Re: Killer asteroids Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-30 20:17 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#291094

starmaker may have meant landed vs hit

marc

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291111

The Starmaker wrote:

> according to yous peoples definition of an asteroid, it was a planet that
> killed the dinosaurs... […]

Don’t drink and post.

F'up2 where it belongs

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291115

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > according to yous peoples definition of an asteroid, it was a planet that
> > killed the dinosaurs... […]
> 
> Don’t drink and post.
> 
> F'up2 where it belongs
> 
> --
> PointedEars
> 
> Twitter: @PointedEars2
> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.





Asteroids are planets
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid


Asteroid definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/asteroid
Asteroid definition: An asteroid is one of the very small planets that move around the sun between Mars and... | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and ...


Asteroid | Definition of Asteroid by Merriam-Webster
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/asteroid
Define asteroid: any one of thousands of small planets that circle around the sun — asteroid in a sentence.


https://www.google.com/#q=define+asteroid



the alumimunium foil on your pointed ears is a little offf...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291140

“The Starmaker” trolled:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > according to yous peoples definition of an asteroid, it was a planet
>> > that killed the dinosaurs... […]
>> Don’t drink and post.
>> 
>> F'up2 where it belongs
> 
> Asteroids are planets

No, they are not; otherwise we would call them “planets”.

> [Wikipedia]

Learn to read, and do not believe everything that you read.


F'up2 where it belongs

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291142

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
> “The Starmaker” trolled:
> 
> > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >> > according to yous peoples definition of an asteroid, it was a planet
> >> > that killed the dinosaurs... […]
> >> Don’t drink and post.
> >>
> >> F'up2 where it belongs
> >
> > Asteroids are planets
> 
> No, they are not; otherwise we would call them “planets”.
> 
> > [Wikipedia]
> 
> Learn to read, and do not believe everything that you read.



But I see three different confirmations that Asteroids are planets:

Asteroids are planets
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid


Asteroid definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/asteroid
Asteroid definition: An asteroid is one of the very small planets that move around the sun between Mars and... | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and ...


Asteroid | Definition of Asteroid by Merriam-Webster
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/asteroid
Define asteroid: any one of thousands of small planets that circle around the sun — asteroid in a sentence.


https://www.google.com/#q=define+asteroid



the alumimunium foil on your pointed ears is a little wayyy off...what does your Vulcan dictionary say what an asteroid is????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291156

“The Starmaker” wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> “The Starmaker” trolled:
>> > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> >> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >> > according to yous peoples definition of an asteroid, it was a planet
>> >> > that killed the dinosaurs... […]
>> >> Don’t drink and post.
>> >>
>> >> F'up2 where it belongs
>> > Asteroids are planets
>> No, they are not; otherwise we would call them “planets”.
>> > [Wikipedia]
>> Learn to read, and do not believe everything that you read.
> 
> But I see three different confirmations that Asteroids are planets:

But you should see there three different confirmations that asteroids are, 
at best, *small* planets (also known as “planetoids”: planet-*like* bodies).

The problem with that term is that since 2006 we have *dwarf* planets that 
have previously been called “asteroids”, like Ceres.

Also, it is not clear whether an “asteroid” or a *meteorite* has caused the 
environmental conditions that led to the extinction of the dinosaurs.

If only you would read what is being (and I have) posted.
 
> [irrelevant evidence]

Next time, try an *up-to-date* *scientific* dictionary.

Get a *real* name.

And get a *working* newsreader.  Unicode 1.0.0 was published in 1991.  There 
is *no excuse* for using a newsreader in the 21st century that does not 
support Unicode.  None at all.  See also 
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5536>, “MIME Conformance”.

And *please* stop the mindless crossposting without Followup-To across 4 
newsgroups.  F'up2 sci.astro set.

> the alumimunium foil on your pointed ears is a little wayyy off...

You are projecting.

> what does your Vulcan dictionary say what an asteroid is????

Unsurprisingly, “asteroid” is {pi'ek'tra} in (Modern) Golic Vulcan; 
literally “*small* planet”, from {pi'~} “small” + {ek'tra} “planet” ({ek'~} 
+ {tra}, literally 
“all/total/complete”-“mass/body/accumulation/assemblage”).

You would do well to recognize the difference.  EOD.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291080

Ned Latham wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > The dumb polack, mlwozniak, wrote:
> > > Ned Latham wroteL
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Did you know that in the history of the earth, not one asteroid
> > > > > ever landed on earth?
> > > >
> > > > That's right. There have been many.
> > >
> > > Rather not.
> > >
> > > https://www.universetoday.com/36398/
> > > what-is-the-difference-between-asteroids-and-meteorites/
> 
> "While we know that some asteroids pass very close to Earth's orbit
> around the Sun, we've been lucky in the history of humanity that we
> haven't had a large asteroid hit Earth in the past several thousand
> years. It wasn't until satellite imagery of Earth became widely
> available that scientists were able to see evidence of past asteroid
> impacts.?
> 
> > > If it landed, it's not an asteroid.
> 
> Wrong again, idiot. You should read your source *before&
> using it.


You want a better source?

"The good news, says Dr. Nugent, is that no known asteroids currently
pose any significant hazard to humans. Only one American is known
definitively to have been hit by a meteorite (what an asteroid is called
after it lands on Earth). In 1954, Ann Hodges of Alabama was struck by
one that fell through her roof, leaving a nearly foot-long bruise on her
side."

In March, Dr. Nugent released her first book, “Asteroid Hunters,” about
the science of tracking and studying space rocks. 
https://www.google.com/#q=asteroid+hunters+by+carrie+nugent

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291110

The Starmaker wrote:
> Ned Latham wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The dumb polack, mlwozniak, wrote:
> > > > Ned Latham wroteL
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did you know that in the history of the earth, not one asteroid
> > > > > > ever landed on earth?
> > > > >
> > > > > That's right. There have been many.
> > > >
> > > > Rather not.
> > > >
> > > > https://www.universetoday.com/36398/
> > > > what-is-the-difference-between-asteroids-and-meteorites/
> > 
> > "While we know that some asteroids pass very close to Earth's orbit
> > around the Sun, we've been lucky in the history of humanity that we
> > haven't had a large asteroid hit Earth in the past several thousand
> > years. It wasn't until satellite imagery of Earth became widely
> > available that scientists were able to see evidence of past asteroid
> > impacts.?
> > 
> > > > If it landed, it's not an asteroid.
> > 
> > Wrong again, idiot. You should read your source *before&
> > using it.
>
> You want a better source?

Were you born stupid? Or do you practise in front of the mirror
at bedtime?

Read the text you quoted below...

> "The good news, says Dr. Nugent, is that no known asteroids currently
> pose any significant hazard to humans. Only one American is known
> definitively to have been hit by a meteorite (what an asteroid is called
> after it lands on Earth). In 1954, Ann Hodges of Alabama was struck by
> one that fell through her roof, leaving a nearly foot-long bruise on her
> side."

Did you see that bit about what an asteroid is called after it hits the
earth? Can you fit the idea into your pointy little head that adding
the generic descriptor "meteor" changes it, not from being an asteroid,
but INTO an asteroid that hit the earth?

> In March, Dr. Nugent released her first book, "Asteroid Hunters," about
> the science of tracking and studying space rocks. 
> https://www.google.com/#q=asteroid+hunters+by+carrie+nugent

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291114

Ned Latham wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > The dumb polack, mlwozniak, wrote:
> > > > > Ned Latham wroteL
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Did you know that in the history of the earth, not one asteroid
> > > > > > > ever landed on earth?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's right. There have been many.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rather not.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.universetoday.com/36398/
> > > > > what-is-the-difference-between-asteroids-and-meteorites/
> > >
> > > "While we know that some asteroids pass very close to Earth's orbit
> > > around the Sun, we've been lucky in the history of humanity that we
> > > haven't had a large asteroid hit Earth in the past several thousand
> > > years. It wasn't until satellite imagery of Earth became widely
> > > available that scientists were able to see evidence of past asteroid
> > > impacts.?
> > >
> > > > > If it landed, it's not an asteroid.
> > >
> > > Wrong again, idiot. You should read your source *before&
> > > using it.
> >
> > You want a better source?
> 
> Were you born stupid? Or do you practise in front of the mirror
> at bedtime?
> 
> Read the text you quoted below...
> 
> > "The good news, says Dr. Nugent, is that no known asteroids currently
> > pose any significant hazard to humans. Only one American is known
> > definitively to have been hit by a meteorite (what an asteroid is called
> > after it lands on Earth). In 1954, Ann Hodges of Alabama was struck by
> > one that fell through her roof, leaving a nearly foot-long bruise on her
> > side."
> 
> Did you see that bit about what an asteroid is called after it hits the
> earth? Can you fit the idea into your pointy little head that adding
> the generic descriptor "meteor" changes it, not from being an asteroid,
> but INTO an asteroid that hit the earth?
> 
> > In March, Dr. Nugent released her first book, "Asteroid Hunters," about
> > the science of tracking and studying space rocks.
> > https://www.google.com/#q=asteroid+hunters+by+carrie+nugent




If it landed on earth...you cannot call it an asteroid. Maybe you don't understand the definition of meteorite...

the second it touches the ground...it's a meteorite...and even before it touches the ground. It's not my fault if you people are....confused.



I'm bringing your confusion to light....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291116

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Ned Latham wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > The dumb polack, mlwozniak, wrote:
> > > > > > Ned Latham wroteL
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Did you know that in the history of the earth, not one asteroid
> > > > > > > > ever landed on earth?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's right. There have been many.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rather not.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.universetoday.com/36398/
> > > > > > what-is-the-difference-between-asteroids-and-meteorites/
> > > >
> > > > "While we know that some asteroids pass very close to Earth's orbit
> > > > around the Sun, we've been lucky in the history of humanity that we
> > > > haven't had a large asteroid hit Earth in the past several thousand
> > > > years. It wasn't until satellite imagery of Earth became widely
> > > > available that scientists were able to see evidence of past asteroid
> > > > impacts.?
> > > >
> > > > > > If it landed, it's not an asteroid.
> > > >
> > > > Wrong again, idiot. You should read your source *before&
> > > > using it.
> > >
> > > You want a better source?
> >
> > Were you born stupid? Or do you practise in front of the mirror
> > at bedtime?
> >
> > Read the text you quoted below...
> >
> > > "The good news, says Dr. Nugent, is that no known asteroids currently
> > > pose any significant hazard to humans. Only one American is known
> > > definitively to have been hit by a meteorite (what an asteroid is called
> > > after it lands on Earth). In 1954, Ann Hodges of Alabama was struck by
> > > one that fell through her roof, leaving a nearly foot-long bruise on her
> > > side."
> >
> > Did you see that bit about what an asteroid is called after it hits the
> > earth? Can you fit the idea into your pointy little head that adding
> > the generic descriptor "meteor" changes it, not from being an asteroid,
> > but INTO an asteroid that hit the earth?
> >
> > > In March, Dr. Nugent released her first book, "Asteroid Hunters," about
> > > the science of tracking and studying space rocks.
> > > https://www.google.com/#q=asteroid+hunters+by+carrie+nugent
> 
> If it landed on earth...you cannot call it an asteroid. Maybe you don't understand the definition of meteorite...
> 
> the second it touches the ground...it's a meteorite...and even before it touches the ground. It's not my fault if you people are....confused.
> 
> I'm bringing your confusion to light....



I bet a million dollars Dr. Nugent doesn't even know the definition of.."asteroid".
https://www.google.com/#q=asteroid+hunters+by+carrie+nugent



Ask her, what kind of answer you think she is going to give???

uhhh, uhhhh, uhhh....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291055

what is the matter ?
PBS has told the world about the Russia strike of the one, 2013, 
asteroid, that itself it blew up inside the atmosphere.   ANd we all know
that already , is a big joke of bull shit  Yet they claim they know and 
are professionals of asteroids hitting the earth.  And they are just now 
reporting on it...  HA HA..

The government shot the dam thing
with their laser energy weapon, which is why it blew up yes hurting many 
in Russia.  But you think for one moment, they would tell the truth of 
it?   Not a dam chance.


For the people would demand payment for all the damage that was done
over in Russia, for their ass hole mistake of shooting the dam thing 
down.  And they also make it sound like it was a baseball size eroid,
that entered the surface to paint the picture rosy, of only a small one, 
when the hole itself, was more than 2 miles wide and there are photos of 
it.  FACT,,,  Not to mention, video of the laser tag itself and the 
droids that launched it.


On 5/25/2017 9:46 AM, The Starmaker scribbled:
> Now that Trump is President..
>
> don't expect to hear from NASA
>
> "Killer Asteroids is Coming!!!!".
>
> If NASA tries to ask for money
> to kill Killer Asteroids..
> Trump would tell NASA "Get The Fuck Out of Here!!!"
>
> So why bother with killer asteriods if there is no money in it?
>
> That's a democratic scam.
>
>
> Next, they should just shut down NASA completely. They serve no purpose.
>
>
> Get rid of all their 'fake science' and what do you have left????
>
>
> They might start searching for water on earth...do you think
> NASA can find liquid water on earth?
>
> You can go to a 7-11 store and ask for "water ice" and they will give you a double look!
>
> Where on earth is anyone going to find "water ice"??? Maybe the underground "water ice" oceans...
>
> You're going to wait maybe 4 or 8 years before you hear "killer asteroids" again.
>
>
> Now is the time to stick a 'water ice' hose down NASA's throat and let them drown in it!
>
> I'll stick it myself.
>
>
> Let those motherfuckers...drown.
>
>
> and their children too in their swimming pools...
>
>
> "Come on in, the liquid water is fine..."
>
> "Honey, can you get me some water ice from the refriderator?"
>
> GETTHEFUCKOUTOFHERE!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291056

Dne 29/05/2017 v 05:40 tesla sTinker napsal(a):

> 
> The government shot the dam thing
> with their laser energy weapon, which is why it blew up yes hurting many
> in Russia.  But you think for one moment, they would tell the truth of
> it?   Not a dam chance.
> 
The Russia in the Tzar era did not have laser technology in 1907,
when one of the biggest object noticed in known human history
collided with Earth and exploded in atmosphere.

In fact, such a behaviour is very common for small asteroids or comets.


-- 
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291077

On 5/28/2017 9:59 PM, Poutnik scribbled:
> Dne 29/05/2017 v 05:40 tesla sTinker napsal(a):
>
>>
>> The government shot the dam thing
>> with their laser energy weapon, which is why it blew up yes hurting many
>> in Russia.  But you think for one moment, they would tell the truth of
>> it?   Not a dam chance.
>>
> The Russia in the Tzar era did not have laser technology in 1907,
> when one of the biggest object noticed in known human history
> collided with Earth and exploded in atmosphere.
>
> In fact, such a behaviour is very common for small asteroids or comets.
>
>
your a liar

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291108

On 5/30/2017 12:29 AM, tesla sTinker wrote:
>
>
> On 5/28/2017 9:59 PM, Poutnik scribbled:
>> Dne 29/05/2017 v 05:40 tesla sTinker napsal(a):
>>
>>>
>>> The government shot the dam thing
>>> with their laser energy weapon, which is why it blew up yes hurting many
>>> in Russia.  But you think for one moment, they would tell the truth of
>>> it?   Not a dam chance.
>>>
>> The Russia in the Tzar era did not have laser technology in 1907,
>> when one of the biggest object noticed in known human history
>> collided with Earth and exploded in atmosphere.
>>
>> In fact, such a behaviour is very common for small asteroids or comets.
>>
>>
> your a liar
>
your a uneducated maroon!

I love these scholarly intellectual science discussions! Where is HVAC? 
This is right at his level of science.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291078

besides, you seem to forget that tesla lived in the late 1800s.  And its 
his laser weapon I speak of.  Not to mention, you have no proof of what 
you have said.   Same as, they do not really know that the earth 
revolves around the sun.  Its just a theory...  No proof.  Only upon 
entry to the atmosphere, could a rock explode.  And it would have to 
have a hollow reason for this to do so.  If it is solid, it will not do 
so at all, especially after it has entered the atmosphere.  Past that 
point, the gs go away, or, those astronauts that did the same thing, on 
their return from the moon, would of exploded as well liar that you are 
ass hole.

On 5/28/2017 9:59 PM, Poutnik scribbled:


> The Russia in the Tzar era did not have laser technology in 1907,
> when one of the biggest object noticed in known human history
> collided with Earth and exploded in atmosphere.
>
> In fact, such a behaviour is very common for small asteroids or comets.
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291120

On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 9:46:53 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Now that Trump is President..
> 
> don't expect to hear from NASA
> 
> "Killer Asteroids is Coming!!!!".
> 
> If NASA tries to ask for money
> to kill Killer Asteroids..
> Trump would tell NASA "Get The Fuck Out of Here!!!"
> 
> So why bother with killer asteriods if there is no money in it?
> 
> That's a democratic scam.
> 
> 
> Next, they should just shut down NASA completely. They serve no purpose.
> 
> 
> Get rid of all their 'fake science' and what do you have left????
> 
> 
> They might start searching for water on earth...do you think
> NASA can find liquid water on earth?
> 
> You can go to a 7-11 store and ask for "water ice" and they will give you a double look!
> 
> Where on earth is anyone going to find "water ice"??? Maybe the underground "water ice" oceans...
> 
> You're going to wait maybe 4 or 8 years before you hear "killer asteroids" again.
> 
> 
> Now is the time to stick a 'water ice' hose down NASA's throat and let them drown in it!
> 
> I'll stick it myself. 
> 
> 
> Let those motherfuckers...drown.
> 
> 

221 AD  ( or sidereal Galactic PED over Beijing: AD and yes, a planet wiper, probably we need to go  to live a while under the sea.  smaller ones, but this one takes half  of  USA? not sure, but it is a huge deal on the granite as I scale it, same scale as used for Seal One.  that is a long time off. things  are happening now. Eclipse and world gone nuts

aug 2017 timeframe

> and their children too in their swimming pools...
> 
> 
> "Come on in, the liquid water is fine..."
> 
> "Honey, can you get me some water ice from the refriderator?"
> 
> GETTHEFUCKOUTOFHERE!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy

csiph-web