Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #282884 > unrolled thread

The Theory of Everything.....

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2016-03-13 15:22 -0800
Last post2016-03-15 12:58 -0700
Articles 11 on this page of 51 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy

Contents

  The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-13 15:22 -0800
    Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 15:55 -0700
    Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-13 16:33 -0800
      Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-14 07:30 +0100
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-15 22:07 +0100
          Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-15 16:08 -0700
            Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:07 +0100
              Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 09:04 -0700
                Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-16 17:57 +0100
                  Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 11:07 -0700
                    Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-16 22:53 +0100
                      Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 13:30 -0700
                        Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-18 01:03 +0100
              Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 13:33 -0700
                Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-18 01:37 +0100
                  Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 07:54 -0700
                    Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-18 16:50 +0100
                      Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 13:47 -0700
          Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-16 06:29 +0100
            Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:08 +0100
              Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 08:56 -0700
                Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-16 17:57 +0100
                  Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 11:08 -0700
                    Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-16 22:46 +0100
                      Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:57 -0700
                        Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:17 +0100
                          Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 13:21 -0700
                            Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-18 00:29 +0100
                              Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 08:03 -0700
                                Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-18 18:31 +0100
                                  Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 13:42 -0700
              Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 08:13 +0200
      Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 12:00 -0800
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 12:00 -0800
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... Herbert Glazier <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 11:42 -0700
    Re: The Theory of Everything..... Malcolm McMahon <malcolm@theriomorph.me.uk> - 2016-03-14 11:06 +0000
    Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 21:04 +0800
      Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 11:37 -0800
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... Vincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com> - 2016-03-14 17:50 -0400
          Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:17 +0800
            Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:18 +0800
          Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-16 20:19 +0100
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 15:04 -0700
    Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 12:02 -0800
      Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 09:16 -0800
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 11:07 -0800
      Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:20 +0800
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 08:52 -0700
        Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:42 -0800
          Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-18 22:04 -0800
    Re: The Theory of Everything..... Double-A <doublea333@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 12:58 -0700

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#282936

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-16 20:18 +0800
Message-ID<ncbioe$c5t$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#282935
On 3/16/2016 8:17 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> On 3/15/2016 5:50 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
>>
>> You mean "Dr. Einstein."   He did have a doctorate, you know.
>>
>
> He's still a Mr. not a Ms. or Mrs.! :)
>

Grammar:

He's still a Mr. not a Ms. nor Mrs.! :)


-- 
   @~@   Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23)  Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64
   ^ ^   20:03:01 up 17:07 0 users load average: 1.09 1.06 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282949

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2016-03-16 20:19 +0100
Message-ID<dktpu0F48qgU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#282907
Am 14.03.2016 22:50, schrieb Vincent Maycock:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:37:14 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>  wrote:
>
>> Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/14/2016 7:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> The Theory of Everything.....is God.
>>>> Isn't it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein?
>
> You mean "Dr. Einstein."   He did have a doctorate, you know.

He was also Professor of theoretical Physics.

This professorship he received through a decree of the Austrian King 
Franz Joseph I, who made him professor in Prague. (Prague was at that 
time part of the Austrian Empire).

He was also citizen of several nations:

born in Germany
then Swiss citizen
then (additional) Austrian
then German again
(until the Nazis revoked his citizenship)
then US-citizen (additional to Swiss)

Possibly he was also citizen of Israel (don't know), since they asked 
him, if he would like to become president. (what he didn't)

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282910

FromSaul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net>
Date2016-03-14 15:04 -0700
Message-ID<6adeebpbb287m8bh9ma6fvh07821sa9ms5@4ax.com>
In reply to#282897
WRONG AGAIN, SHITHEAD!

Saul Levy


On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:37:14 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>> 
>> On 3/14/2016 7:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > The Theory of Everything.....is God.
>> > Isn't it?
>> >
>> 
>> The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein?
>
>
>
>The Unified Field Theory of Mr. Einstein was only about electricty and
>gravity, not about everything else.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282899

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-14 12:02 -0800
Message-ID<56E718C2.11E0@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#282884
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> 
> Isn't it?


If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282918

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-15 09:16 -0800
Message-ID<56E84357.6B62@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#282899
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> >
> > Isn't it?
> 
> If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.


and that includes 'the scientific methods' also.



And those who require...evidence


a visible sign of something (it's not visible, dummie)


material that is presented to a court of law to help find the truth about something (God doesn't do jury duty)

something which shows that something else exists (yous don't even know what existence means) 


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evidence


throw the requiment of 'evidence' out the window also!



Now, that I threw out all the garbage...



Where do you start?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282920

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-15 11:07 -0800
Message-ID<56E85D78.4139@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#282918
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> > >
> > > Isn't it?
> >
> > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.
> 
> and that includes 'the scientific methods' also.
> 
> And those who require...evidence
> 
> a visible sign of something (it's not visible, dummie)
> 
> material that is presented to a court of law to help find the truth about something (God doesn't do jury duty)
> 
> something which shows that something else exists (yous don't even know what existence means)
> 
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evidence
> 
> throw the requiment of 'evidence' out the window also!
> 
> Now, that I threw out all the garbage...
> 
> Where do you start?


i might have to throw out 'logic' also because that appears to an invention of man...



Do you know any girls who are logical??? They are certaintly known to be...irrational.


Let me rephrase...

i might have to throw out 'logic' also because that appears to an invention of mEn...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282937

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-16 20:20 +0800
Message-ID<ncbirt$c5t$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#282899
On 3/15/2016 4:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.
>

WRONG!!!! To really understand science and Gods, you need ultimate 
rationalism, or you might burn another St. Joan of Arc!

BTW, there is actually a compression method called "arc", program named 
PKARC! :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23)  Linux 4.4.4-301.fc23.x86_64
   ^ ^   20:03:01 up 17:07 0 users load average: 1.09 1.06 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282941

FromSaul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net>
Date2016-03-16 08:52 -0700
Message-ID<560jeb15cdmfpg0g6mdn8cr4eghoh56nnk@4ax.com>
In reply to#282937
JOAN WAS INSANE!  SHE HAD TO BURN!  JUST LIKE ARCieSHITHEAD IS FUCKED
IN THE HEAD!

lLOCK SUCH MORONS AWAY!

Saul Levy


On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:20:09 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 3/15/2016 4:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.
>>
>
>WRONG!!!! To really understand science and Gods, you need ultimate 
>rationalism, or you might burn another St. Joan of Arc!
>
>BTW, there is actually a compression method called "arc", program named 
>PKARC! :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282969

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-16 23:42 -0800
Message-ID<56EA5FCC.4C9C@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#282937
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> 
> On 3/15/2016 4:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.
> >
> 
> WRONG!!!! To really understand science and Gods, you need ultimate
> rationalism, or you might burn another St. Joan of Arc!


rationalism is just a small part...it is not everything.

for example...are your dreams rational?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#283045

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-18 22:04 -0800
Message-ID<56ECEBFF.199A@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#282969
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> >
> > On 3/15/2016 4:02 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > If you want to understand God, you need first to throw 'rationalism' out the window.
> > >
> >
> > WRONG!!!! To really understand science and Gods, you need ultimate
> > rationalism, or you might burn another St. Joan of Arc!
> 
> rationalism is just a small part...it is not everything.
> 
> for example...are your dreams rational?


what i mean is...

there are 24 hours a day..

8 hours is spent
having dreams
that seem to make no sense..
the lights don't even work.

the other 8 hours is spent
on how may rational hours?

what about the other 8 hours?
thta is spent on murders, drugs,
violence, dancing, watching 8 hours 
of tv, and who knows wat else
you people do in those hours?

So, that leaves less than
8 hours of rationalism.

Dreams are just...hallucinations.

Some of yous are probably hallucinating right now
and not even dreaming...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282925

FromDouble-A <doublea333@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-15 12:58 -0700
Message-ID<12497473-a677-4bde-92bb-67b7ec984c0c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#282884
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 3:22:49 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Theory of Everything.....is God.
> 
> 
> Isn't it?


God conceived the theory of everything.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy

csiph-web