Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #282167 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-02-17 11:49 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 45 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-16 13:27 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 12:01 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Double-A <doublea333@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:47 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-16 14:03 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2016-02-16 17:42 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 11:58 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 17:13 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 08:39 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 16:57 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 18:59 -0700
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-19 19:58 -0700
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 14:47 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 08:42 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 13:46 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 16:38 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 13:45 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 16:42 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-02-18 13:04 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 11:49 -0700
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800 |
| Subject | GRAVITY... |
| Message-ID | <56C37C07.5882@ix.netcom.com> |
i saw a person fall down.. and i wondered to myself... how many planets were involved? it couldn't have just been the moon... i imagine other planets having a piece of the action.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <msKdnTe6WcexF17LnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #282167 |
On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > i saw > a person > fall down.. > and i > wondered to > myself... > how many planets > were involved? Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56C38B72.A1E@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #282174 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > i saw > > a person > > fall down.. > > and i > > wondered to > > myself... > > how many planets > > were involved? > > Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. > Are you saying Gravity contains...energy???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <msKdnTC6Wce8CV7LnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #282175 |
On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> i saw >>> a person >>> fall down.. >>> and i >>> wondered to >>> myself... >>> how many planets >>> were involved? >> >> Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. >> > > > Are you saying Gravity contains...energy??? > No... According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass, mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting in what we call gravitation. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 13:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <451a802c-89e0-488c-851d-06d339f2a631@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #282179 |
On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > >> > >> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> i saw > >>> a person > >>> fall down.. > >>> and i > >>> wondered to > >>> myself... > >>> how many planets > >>> were involved? > >> > >> Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. > >> > > > > > > Are you saying Gravity contains...energy??? > > > > No... > According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass, > mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting > in what we call gravitation. > > > > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. can u move this to 6 year old level ,You bore us.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 12:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <sog9cbdkk2r5kcgusamij9l444alp9tou5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #282180 |
SO SAYS THE BIGGEST BORE OF ALL! YOUR BASKETWEAVING DESIGNS BORE US (WHERE ARE THEY? FUCK OFF, ARCieSHIT! Saul Levyl On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:27:47 -0800 (PST), Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: >> On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> > Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >>> i saw >> >>> a person >> >>> fall down.. >> >>> and i >> >>> wondered to >> >>> myself... >> >>> how many planets >> >>> were involved? >> >> >> >> Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. >> >> >> > >> > >> > Are you saying Gravity contains...energy??? >> > >> >> No... >> According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass, >> mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting >> in what we call gravitation. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated >> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics >> community, and physics-related social issues. > >can u move this to 6 year old level ,You bore us.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56C3A23C.EEE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #282179 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > >> > >> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> i saw > >>> a person > >>> fall down.. > >>> and i > >>> wondered to > >>> myself... > >>> how many planets > >>> were involved? > >> > >> Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. > >> > > > > > > Are you saying Gravity contains...energy??? > > > > No... > According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass, > mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting > in what we call gravitation. There is no such word as "momentum-energy".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <doublea333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 14:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <837d475a-e22c-4961-a29f-adc00ad0d23c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #282181 |
On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 2:27:04 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: > > > > On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Sam Wormley wrote: > > >> > > >> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>> i saw > > >>> a person > > >>> fall down.. > > >>> and i > > >>> wondered to > > >>> myself... > > >>> how many planets > > >>> were involved? > > >> > > >> Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. > > >> > > > > > > > > > Are you saying Gravity contains...energy??? > > > > > > > No... > > According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass, > > mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting > > in what we call gravitation. > > > There is no such word as "momentum-energy". I wonder what the units for that would be? Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <J9udnfI_jvjCLF7LnZ2dnUU7-bsAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #282181 |
On 2/16/16 4:27 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Sam Wormley wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> i saw >>>>> a person >>>>> fall down.. >>>>> and i >>>>> wondered to >>>>> myself... >>>>> how many planets >>>>> were involved? >>>> >>>> Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Are you saying Gravity contains...energy??? >>> >> >> No... >> According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass, >> mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting >> in what we call gravitation. > > > There is no such word as "momentum-energy". > It's routinely used in general relativity textbooks. And it is much easier than saying mass, mass in motion and energy. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy–momentum_relation E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2 -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56C3B6BA.3905@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #282186 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 2/16/16 4:27 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > >> > >> On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Sam Wormley wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> i saw > >>>>> a person > >>>>> fall down.. > >>>>> and i > >>>>> wondered to > >>>>> myself... > >>>>> how many planets > >>>>> were involved? > >>>> > >>>> Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Are you saying Gravity contains...energy??? > >>> > >> > >> No... > >> According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass, > >> mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting > >> in what we call gravitation. > > > > > > There is no such word as "momentum-energy". > > > > It's routinely used in general relativity textbooks. And it is much > easier than saying mass, mass in motion and energy. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy–momentum_relation > > E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2 > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy%E2%80%93momentum_relation Energy–momentum_relation or "momentum-energy" has nothing to do with Gravity! Do you see any mention of the word "Gravity" on the page from the link you provided???? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy%E2%80%93momentum_relation
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <J9udne8_jvinJF7LnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #282188 |
On 2/16/16 5:54 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> On 2/16/16 4:27 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Sam Wormley wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> Sam Wormley wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> i saw >>>>>>> a person >>>>>>> fall down.. >>>>>>> and i >>>>>>> wondered to >>>>>>> myself... >>>>>>> how many planets >>>>>>> were involved? >>>>>> >>>>>> Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are you saying Gravity contains...energy??? >>>>> >>>> >>>> No... >>>> According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass, >>>> mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting >>>> in what we call gravitation. >>> >>> >>> There is no such word as "momentum-energy". >>> >> >> It's routinely used in general relativity textbooks. And it is much >> easier than saying mass, mass in motion and energy. >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy–momentum_relation >> >> E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2 >> > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy%E2%80%93momentum_relation > > Energy–momentum_relation or "momentum-energy" > > has nothing to do with Gravity! > Even some school kids know the mass and energy warp spacetime and that warped spacetime tells mass how to move (gravity) "Gravity is not a foreign and physical force transmitted through space and time. It is a manifestation of the curvature of spacetime." That, in a nutshell, is Einstein's theory. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56C40510.40D7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #282189 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 2/16/16 5:54 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > >> > >> On 2/16/16 4:27 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Sam Wormley wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 2/16/16 2:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> Sam Wormley wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2/16/16 1:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> i saw > >>>>>>> a person > >>>>>>> fall down.. > >>>>>>> and i > >>>>>>> wondered to > >>>>>>> myself... > >>>>>>> how many planets > >>>>>>> were involved? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Every bit of momentum-energy was involved, but not all significantly. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Are you saying Gravity contains...energy??? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> No... > >>>> According to general relativity, our best model of gravitation, mass, > >>>> mass in motion and energy (momentum-energy) warp spacetime resulting > >>>> in what we call gravitation. > >>> > >>> > >>> There is no such word as "momentum-energy". > >>> > >> > >> It's routinely used in general relativity textbooks. And it is much > >> easier than saying mass, mass in motion and energy. > >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy–momentum_relation > >> > >> E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2 > >> > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy%E2%80%93momentum_relation > > > > Energy–momentum_relation or "momentum-energy" > > > > has nothing to do with Gravity! > > > > Even some school kids know the mass and energy warp spacetime and that > warped spacetime tells mass how to move (gravity) > > "Gravity is not a foreign and physical force transmitted through space > and time. It is a manifestation of the curvature of spacetime." > That, in a nutshell, is Einstein's theory. > "manifestation"???? sounds too religious to me... manifestation is not physics, it's metaphysical...physcology.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 14:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hj37cb9b4j98j7lm3eg9o4oupkpncegmig@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #282167 |
FAKER IS AN INSANE FAKER! Saul Levy On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:44:07 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >i saw >a person >fall down.. >and i >wondered to >myself... >how many planets >were involved? > >it couldn't have just >been the moon... > >i imagine other >planets having >a piece of the >action.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 17:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <na0c5l$2vf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #282177 |
THE ONLY THING SAUL KNOWS ABOUT GRAVITY IS THAT IT CAUSES HIS BALLSACK TO DANGLE IN THE COLD WATER WHEN HE SITS ON THE SHITTER. Notroll2016 "Saul Levy" wrote in message news:hj37cb9b4j98j7lm3eg9o4oupkpncegmig@4ax.com... FAKER IS AN INSANE FAKER! Saul Levy On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:44:07 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >i saw >a person >fall down.. >and i >wondered to >myself... >how many planets >were involved? > >it couldn't have just >been the moon... > >i imagine other >planets having >a piece of the >action.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 11:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <okg9cbpsgdip81fft7k82psg9jhsa1sps0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #282187 |
AND NOTROLL IS A JACKASS FER SURE! ARE YOU TRYING TO OUT FAKE, FAKER? Saul Levy On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:42:48 -0600, "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net> wrote: >THE ONLY THING SAUL KNOWS ABOUT GRAVITY IS THAT IT CAUSES HIS BALLSACK TO >DANGLE IN THE COLD WATER WHEN HE SITS ON THE SHITTER. > >Notroll2016 > >"Saul Levy" wrote in message >news:hj37cb9b4j98j7lm3eg9o4oupkpncegmig@4ax.com... > >FAKER IS AN INSANE FAKER! > >Saul Levy > > >On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:44:07 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>i saw >>a person >>fall down.. >>and i >>wondered to >>myself... >>how many planets >>were involved? >> >>it couldn't have just >>been the moon... >> >>i imagine other >>planets having >>a piece of the >>action.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 17:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d101a0ad-79eb-496e-9b88-ba8de3058a6f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #282222 |
On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 10:58:40 AM UTC-8, Saul Levy wrote: > AND NOTROLL IS A JACKASS FER SURE! > > ARE YOU TRYING TO OUT FAKE, FAKER? > > Saul Levy > but that is your daddy? > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:42:48 -0600, "Notroll2016" > <notroll2015@charter.net> wrote: > > >THE ONLY THING SAUL KNOWS ABOUT GRAVITY IS THAT IT CAUSES HIS BALLSACK TO > >DANGLE IN THE COLD WATER WHEN HE SITS ON THE SHITTER. > > > >Notroll2016 > > > >"Saul Levy" wrote in message > >news:hj37cb9b4j98j7lm3eg9o4oupkpncegmig@4ax.com... > > > >FAKER IS AN INSANE FAKER! > > > >Saul Levy > > > > > >On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:44:07 -0800, The Starmaker > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > >>i saw > >>a person > >>fall down.. > >>and i > >>wondered to > >>myself... > >>how many planets > >>were involved? > >> > >>it couldn't have just > >>been the moon... > >> > >>i imagine other > >>planets having > >>a piece of the > >>action.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 08:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <s8pbcb1usen8frbs34to0j66kg1d88s9g8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #282234 |
YOU'D THINK SOMEONE AS WELL-EDUCATED AS YOU WOULD OCCASIONALLY MAKE SOME SENSE! BUT YOU DON'T! YOU ARE A COMPLETE LOSER, FAGGOT ASSHOLE! Saul Levy On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:13:31 -0800 (PST), Arc Michael <abookofDEATH@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 10:58:40 AM UTC-8, Saul Levy wrote: >> AND NOTROLL IS A JACKASS FER SURE! >> >> ARE YOU TRYING TO OUT FAKE, FAKER? >> >> Saul Levy >> > >but that is your daddy? >> >> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:42:48 -0600, "Notroll2016" >> <notroll2015@charter.net> wrote: >> >> >THE ONLY THING SAUL KNOWS ABOUT GRAVITY IS THAT IT CAUSES HIS BALLSACK TO >> >DANGLE IN THE COLD WATER WHEN HE SITS ON THE SHITTER. >> > >> >Notroll2016 >> > >> >"Saul Levy" wrote in message >> >news:hj37cb9b4j98j7lm3eg9o4oupkpncegmig@4ax.com... >> > >> >FAKER IS AN INSANE FAKER! >> > >> >Saul Levy >> > >> > >> >On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:44:07 -0800, The Starmaker >> ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> > >> >>i saw >> >>a person >> >>fall down.. >> >>and i >> >>wondered to >> >>myself... >> >>how many planets >> >>were involved? >> >> >> >>it couldn't have just >> >>been the moon... >> >> >> >>i imagine other >> >>planets having >> >>a piece of the >> >>action.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56C4153A.3A1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #282167 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > i saw > a person > fall down.. > and i > wondered to > myself... > how many planets > were involved? > > it couldn't have just > been the moon... > > i imagine other > planets having > a piece of the > action. It seems that most of yous are too close to the trees to see the forest... yous do understand the Gravity...is 'just a theory'? haves yous forgotten?? it's...just a theory....just a belief...speculation. No one can say Gravity is true.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56C4B116.7835@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #282204 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > i saw > > a person > > fall down.. > > and i > > wondered to > > myself... > > how many planets > > were involved? > > > > it couldn't have just > > been the moon... > > > > i imagine other > > planets having > > a piece of the > > action. > > It seems that most of yous > are too close to the trees to see the forest... > > yous do understand the Gravity...is 'just a theory'? > > haves yous forgotten?? > > it's...just a theory....just a belief...speculation. > > No one can say Gravity is true. I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist and is true...how can you find gravity waves? That's like saying there is no God but you know what kind of car he drives.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <lOadnaBYLL4fL1nLnZ2dnUU7-cmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #282215 |
On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists. You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists. You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut, therefore, gravity exists. You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen into helium, therefore, gravity exists. The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web