Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #279745 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-12-20 10:44 -0800 |
| Articles | 12 on this page of 92 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-08 11:48 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 13:04 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 18:01 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-09 11:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:30 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:26 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-12 09:28 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-18 06:45 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 10:51 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-19 13:36 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 21:35 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-18 16:12 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 12:56 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-12 09:26 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-18 14:28 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:22 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:13 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 19:47 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:51 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 22:06 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 00:04 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:32 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:29 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 22:02 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-11 07:48 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-11 13:54 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 22:55 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 07:54 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 09:16 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 19:47 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2015-12-13 09:06 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 07:01 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-21 05:45 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 14:03 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-08 17:42 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-12-08 22:07 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-09 05:38 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-09 12:07 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-12-09 06:42 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-11 22:39 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 19:46 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 22:50 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-09 05:54 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 09:09 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:07 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:46 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-10 07:19 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-10 18:10 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 00:01 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 08:44 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 22:44 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 08:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:00 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 18:30 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 17:45 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-17 19:24 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-17 19:25 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-16 11:44 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:20 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-17 17:13 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:47 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 12:26 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 09:52 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:11 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:28 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 22:58 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 23:14 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 10:51 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 07:57 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 10:48 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 11:00 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 22:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-19 13:40 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 16:52 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-25 08:40 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 23:01 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 10:20 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 12:31 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 11:31 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 14:19 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 13:37 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-31 14:56 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-30 18:06 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-06 12:23 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 15:12 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-19 13:34 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 11:02 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 11:06 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "G=EMC^2TreBert" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 10:44 -0800
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-29 12:31 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <L_-dnVQD-bf7TB_LnZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #280497 |
On 12/29/15 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > When you have a big bang....you're going to need a big fuckin refridgerator! Expansion cools just fine. We are already down to 2.7 degrees above absolute zero. Pretty cool, huh? -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-29 11:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5682DF9E.7897@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #280498 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 12/29/15 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > When you have a big bang....you're going to need a big fuckin refridgerator! > > Expansion cools just fine. We are already down to 2.7 degrees above > absolute zero. Pretty cool, huh? > if you take a rubber band....and you expand it, it gets hotter, not cooler. you just don't understand...physics. you've been cutting classes... You just failed my physics class. I'm giving you an F.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-29 14:19 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <97ednQAJ3qZ-dx_LnZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #280500 |
On 12/29/15 1:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > if you take a rubber band....and you expand it, it gets hotter, not > cooler. Too bad about your rubber band -- Expansion of the universe cools it. We are already down to 2.7 degrees above absolute zero. Pretty cool, huh? -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-29 13:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5682FD05.1DD4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #280501 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 12/29/15 1:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > if you take a rubber band....and you expand it, it gets hotter, not > > cooler. > > Too bad about your rubber band -- Expansion of the universe cools it. > We are already down to 2.7 degrees above absolute zero. Pretty cool, > huh? The universe is not expanding, space is expanding. > you just don't understand...physics. > > you've been cutting classes... > > You just failed my physics class. I'm giving you an F. You just failed my physics class, again! I'm giving you two F's. The universe is the REFRIDGERATION! Don't come back to class, ...go to Hamburger University.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-31 14:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <r29b8bpqrkcfhd2vtff981sctn2vbadbs5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #280516 |
SEND SAM TO BEZERKLEY, FAKER! THAT'S WHERE YOU BELONG TOO! Saul Levy On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 13:37:09 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> On 12/29/15 1:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> > >> > if you take a rubber band....and you expand it, it gets hotter, not >> > cooler. >> >> Too bad about your rubber band -- Expansion of the universe cools it. >> We are already down to 2.7 degrees above absolute zero. Pretty cool, >> huh? > > >The universe is not expanding, space is expanding. > > >> you just don't understand...physics. >> >> you've been cutting classes... >> >> You just failed my physics class. I'm giving you an F. > > >You just failed my physics class, again! I'm giving you two F's. > > > >The universe is the REFRIDGERATION! > > > >Don't come back to class, ...go to Hamburger University.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-30 18:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <tpv88b1c0eelltupfu7u91crbkifodbgpf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #280497 |
WHAT YOU BADLY NEED, FAKER, IS A BRAIN THAT WORKS! DON'T BOTHER US! IDIOT! Saul Levy On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:20:31 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >In other words... > >95 percent of the universe is one big fuckin refridgerator!!! > > >That is how science classes should be taught! > >A nucleaur reactor without a cooling system will not work...ask Einstein. > > >When you have a big bang....you're going to need a big fuckin refridgerator! > > >You cannot wait for it to cool off...no fuckin way, class. > >No fuckin way > >Throw your WMAP/CMB into the garbage can! > >It is missing an important component....REFRIDGERATION! > > > >Not a trillion years of waiting to cool off...you turn on the air condition and it get's cool. > > >It's as simple as that! > > >Do I got to publish another True Science Magazine????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-06 12:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <568D77CA.1FB3@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #280267 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center. > > > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nobody! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My IQ must be in the trillions... > > > > > > > > > > > > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo! > > > > > > > > > > > > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars! > > > > > > > > > > > > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang. > > > > > > > > > > > > You have no idea. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally. > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors. > > > > > > > > > > > > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a reason why I'm... > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > > > > > I'll help some of yous out here... > > > > > > > > > > If you go to Google > > > > > then click Images > > > > > then click the camera icon in the search bar > > > > > then > > > > > Paste image URL > > > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars. > > > > > > > > > > (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.) > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > > > > > I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars. > > > > > > > > > > What you see here is... > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > > > what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe > > > > > less time than that. > > > > > > > > > > Carl Sagan — 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.' > > > > > > > > Of course, there is another angle...to this photo: > > > > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > One that I fear I should not mentioned...because to most of yous...it's too fantastic. > > > > > > > > But that thing you see in space that you call dark matter...or the dark areas around the green stars in the photo...or > > > > the dark night black look you see surrounding the stars at night.... > > > > > > > > there is an edge > > > > beyond the dark > > > > > > > > and beyond that > > > > dark edge > > > > is > > > > light... > > > > > > > > very similar > > > > to what a fish > > > > sees if he > > > > leaves his > > > > ocean floor... > > > > another world. > > > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > In other words to make it clearer... > > > > > > beyond the night sky > > > > > > surrounding the stars > > > > > > if you go past > > > > > > the dark night sky > > > > > > there lies > > > > > > the mechanism > > > > > > to what makes > > > > > > stars. > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > Now, it's pretty far away.... > > really far away,, > > hard to catch up with > > since it's probably > > moving faster than the speed of light.. > > > > but, once you get past the ocean edge of > > space... > > you will find > > another world. > > > > No different from what a fish sees. > > > > But, what you need is...proof. > > > > Otherwise, everything I tell you > > you'll dismiss as...pure speculation. > > > > Here is the proof...my WMAP, my CMB...if you will.. > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > Have you've seen anything like it? > > By using my WMAP/CMB > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > all your unanswered questions are...answered. > > For example... > > This unanswered question of What Is The Dark Matter? > > I'll answer it, correctly... > > By using my WMAP/CMB > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > dark matter > is simply > a REFRIDGERATION. > > It is designed > to > absorb the heat and light > from the universe... > from the stars. > > The Starmaker ...but, using my starWMAP/CMB http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg it appears that beyond the edge pass the dark matter.. time doesn't exist. It seems like time stood still.. like being caught in a single time frame.. like a snapshot moment. The White Matter on the other side appears to be light and energy. We must be on the negative side of the universe. The Starmaker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-06 15:12 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <T9SdndkY8MO5HhDLnZ2dnUU7-N-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #280960 |
On 1/6/16 2:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> it appears that
> beyond the edge
> pass the dark matter..
> time doesn't exist.
## #
## #
#########################################
#########################################
## ######
## ##########
############
##############
#############
#############
##############
#############
##############
#############
##############
############# #
############# #
#########################################
#########################################
#
########
###############
##################
#####################
#### ####
## ##
## ##
## ##
## ###
## ##
#### ####
#####################
##################
###############
########
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 13:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mnfb7btl80o1d6400g3lc38jr5go6ecr1c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279970 |
FAKER IS A JACKASSHOLE! THEY AREN'T YOURS, YOU FUCKING LIAR! Saul Levy On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:00:35 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >The Starmaker wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >> > >> > The Starmaker wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center. >> > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html >> > > >> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg >> > > >> > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts. >> > > >> > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!! >> > > >> > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg >> > > >> > > Nobody! >> > > >> > > Why is that? >> > > >> > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies! >> > > >> > > My IQ must be in the trillions... >> > >> > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu >> > >> > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html >> > >> > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang: >> > >> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg >> > >> > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo! >> > >> > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars! >> > >> > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!! >> > >> > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang. >> > >> > You have no idea. >> > >> > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!! >> > >> > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally. >> > >> > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors. >> > >> > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse. >> > >> > There is a reason why I'm... >> > >> > The Starmaker >> >> I'll help some of yous out here... >> >> If you go to Google >> then click Images >> then click the camera icon in the search bar >> then >> Paste image URL >> >> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg >> >> You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars. >> >> (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.) >> >> The Starmaker >> >> I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars. >> >> What you see here is... >> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg >> >> what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe >> less time than that. >> >> Carl Sagan — 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.' > > >Of course, there is another angle...to this photo: > > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > >One that I fear I should not mentioned...because to most of yous...it's too fantastic. > > >But that thing you see in space that you call dark matter...or the dark areas around the green stars in the photo...or >the dark night black look you see surrounding the stars at night.... > > >there is an edge >beyond the dark > >and beyond that >dark edge >is >light... > >very similar >to what a fish >sees if he >leaves his >ocean floor... >another world. > > > > >The Starmaker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-18 11:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fei87bte5u6vumekpmimn300bhrmmmihpe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279941 |
WHAT YOU ARE, FAKER, IS JUST ANOTHER EMISSION FROM YOUR ASSHOLE! THE STUPIDOUS EMISSION POSSIBLE! THERE ARE NO GREEN STARS, SHITHEAD! Saul Levy On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:28:31 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >The Starmaker wrote: > >> >> Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center. >> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html >> >> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg >> >> at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts. >> >> Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!! >> >> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg >> >> Nobody! >> >> Why is that? >> >> Cause i'm a fuckin genuies! >> >> My IQ must be in the trillions... > > >I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu > >http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > > > > >Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang: > > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > >This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo! > > >You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars! > > > >it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!! > > >You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang. > >You have no idea. > > >I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!! > > >I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally. > >I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors. > > >You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse. > > >There is a reason why I'm... > > >The Starmaker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-18 11:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ali87b9l4eetv2ari19ia1lm078mshrc6p@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279938 |
LOOKS TO ME LIKE YOU JUST HAD A BAD CASE OF DIARRHEA! SMELLS LIKE IT TOO! AND YOU ARE A FUCKING RETARD! Saul Levy On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:11:36 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center. >http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > >at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts. > > >Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!! > >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > >Nobody! > >Why is that? > > >Cause i'm a fuckin genuies! > >My IQ must be in the trillions...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "G=EMC^2TreBert" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-20 10:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <951b24e6-0069-43a6-98ec-43ccedadad1e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #279745 |
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 10:23:06 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > > How many times have you heard that? > > It seems... > there is a small group of people.. > in the 'scientific community'.. > there is this ..belief or opinion, that > "There is no edge to the universe". > > They, go as far as telling everyone > "There is no edge to the universe". > > They will get together > and come up with > all kinds of explanations, > and numbers, to Why and How > "There is no edge to the universe". > > It's like a mantra. > "There is no edge to the universe" > "There is no edge to the universe" > "There is no edge to the universe" > > And if you disagree with them... > they will have you shot! > > So, why the mantra? > > Who discovered that there > is no edge to the universe? > > Did they send Columbus to look?? > > They will have you believe that > the universe is infinite. That is just > a ploy to have you believe... > "There is no edge to the universe". > > Get it? It's a con! > > > con > kän/ > > 1. > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. > > noun > noun: con; plural noun: cons > > 1. > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. > > > The Question of course is...what is behind these people > from trying to convince everyone that > there is no edge to the universe? > > Why are they trying to deceive you? > > > The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. Edge is all QM.FuZZY TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web