Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #279745 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-12-20 10:44 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 92 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-08 11:48 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 13:04 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 18:01 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-09 11:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:30 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:26 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-12 09:28 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-18 06:45 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 10:51 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-19 13:36 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 21:35 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-18 16:12 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 12:56 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-12 09:26 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-18 14:28 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:22 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:13 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 19:47 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:51 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 22:06 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 00:04 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:32 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:29 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 22:02 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-11 07:48 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-11 13:54 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 22:55 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 07:54 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 09:16 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 19:47 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2015-12-13 09:06 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 07:01 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-21 05:45 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 14:03 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-08 17:42 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-12-08 22:07 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-09 05:38 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-09 12:07 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-12-09 06:42 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-11 22:39 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 19:46 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 22:50 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-09 05:54 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 09:09 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:07 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:46 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-10 07:19 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-10 18:10 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 00:01 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 08:44 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 22:44 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 08:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:00 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 18:30 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 17:45 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-17 19:24 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-17 19:25 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-16 11:44 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:20 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-17 17:13 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:47 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 12:26 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 09:52 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:11 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:28 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 22:58 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 23:14 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 10:51 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 07:57 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 10:48 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 11:00 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 22:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-19 13:40 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 16:52 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-25 08:40 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 23:01 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 10:20 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 12:31 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 11:31 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 14:19 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 13:37 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-31 14:56 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-30 18:06 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-06 12:23 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 15:12 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-19 13:34 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 11:02 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 11:06 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "G=EMC^2TreBert" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 10:44 -0800
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800 |
| Subject | There Is No Edge To The Universe |
| Message-ID | <56672006.3AA7@ix.netcom.com> |
"There Is No Edge To The Universe".
How many times have you heard that?
It seems...
there is a small group of people..
in the 'scientific community'..
there is this ..belief or opinion, that
"There is no edge to the universe".
They, go as far as telling everyone
"There is no edge to the universe".
They will get together
and come up with
all kinds of explanations,
and numbers, to Why and How
"There is no edge to the universe".
It's like a mantra.
"There is no edge to the universe"
"There is no edge to the universe"
"There is no edge to the universe"
And if you disagree with them...
they will have you shot!
So, why the mantra?
Who discovered that there
is no edge to the universe?
Did they send Columbus to look??
They will have you believe that
the universe is infinite. That is just
a ploy to have you believe...
"There is no edge to the universe".
Get it? It's a con!
con
kän/
1.
persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception.
noun
noun: con; plural noun: cons
1.
an instance of deceiving or tricking someone.
The Question of course is...what is behind these people
from trying to convince everyone that
there is no edge to the universe?
Why are they trying to deceive you?
The truth is, they don't even want you to question it.
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-08 11:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3f9e6b585c6r77a28bb53afvik1m5s71q3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279745 |
STILL A FAKER! Saul Levy On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:23:02 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >"There Is No Edge To The Universe". > >How many times have you heard that? > >It seems... >there is a small group of people.. >in the 'scientific community'.. >there is this ..belief or opinion, that >"There is no edge to the universe". > >They, go as far as telling everyone >"There is no edge to the universe". > >They will get together >and come up with >all kinds of explanations, >and numbers, to Why and How >"There is no edge to the universe". > >It's like a mantra. >"There is no edge to the universe" >"There is no edge to the universe" >"There is no edge to the universe" > >And if you disagree with them... >they will have you shot! > >So, why the mantra? > >Who discovered that there >is no edge to the universe? > >Did they send Columbus to look?? > >They will have you believe that >the universe is infinite. That is just >a ploy to have you believe... >"There is no edge to the universe". > >Get it? It's a con! > > >con >kän/ > > 1. > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. > >noun >noun: con; plural noun: cons > > 1. > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. > > >The Question of course is...what is behind these people >from trying to convince everyone that > there is no edge to the universe? > >Why are they trying to deceive you? > > >The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. > > > > > >The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-08 13:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <KbOdnSBO5rI2tPrLnZ2dnUU7-IGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #279745 |
On 12/8/15 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > How many times have you heard that? It is not the number of times you hear it that makes it so, but the consistency between observations and theory that make "no edge" logical and compelling. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-08 18:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <wjJ9y.17707$NY1.2476@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #279748 |
On 12/08/2015 02:04 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 12/8/15 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> "There Is No Edge To The Universe".
>> How many times have you heard that?
>
>
> It is not the number of times you hear it that makes it so,
> but the consistency between observations and theory that
> make "no edge" logical and compelling.
Sammy, you are totally ignorant of science. Professors have assured me
that the more times you hear something repeated the more true is is. For
example the "consensus" among scientists that man-made CO2 causes global
warming clearly makes it irrefutable and anyone who tries to say that
science isn't done by democratic vote is clearly a "Denier".
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 11:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n49oqd$st8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #279748 |
On 12/8/2015 1:04 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/8/15 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> "There Is No Edge To The Universe". >> How many times have you heard that? > > > It is not the number of times you hear it that makes it so, > but the consistency between observations and theory that > make "no edge" logical and compelling. > > > So just so we're clear here where is that consistency in your climate theories? only idiots will debate other idiots and more often than not expose their idiocy such as you did here Hoisted by your own petard.... Karma at its very best
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 12:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56688B4F.E43@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279775 |
David Staup wrote: > > On 12/8/2015 1:04 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 12/8/15 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >> "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > >> How many times have you heard that? > > > > > > It is not the number of times you hear it that makes it so, > > but the consistency between observations and theory that > > make "no edge" logical and compelling. > > > > > > > So just so we're clear here > > where is that consistency in your climate theories? > > only idiots will debate other idiots > > and more often than not expose their idiocy such as you did here > > Hoisted by your own petard.... Karma at its very best "Karma"??? Is that like 'a force' that travels in the air like a boomberang???? Comes alllllll theeee wayyyyyyyy around and hits you on the head, is that right? I once did a test and observation on "Karma", doesn't work, it's wrong..whatever you think it is, it's wrong, doesn't work. There is no Karma.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-10 12:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n4cg81$j8g$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #279779 |
On 12/9/2015 2:13 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > David Staup wrote: >> >> On 12/8/2015 1:04 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >>> On 12/8/15 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> "There Is No Edge To The Universe". >>>> How many times have you heard that? >>> >>> >>> It is not the number of times you hear it that makes it so, >>> but the consistency between observations and theory that >>> make "no edge" logical and compelling. >>> >>> >>> >> So just so we're clear here >> >> where is that consistency in your climate theories? >> >> only idiots will debate other idiots >> >> and more often than not expose their idiocy such as you did here >> >> Hoisted by your own petard.... Karma at its very best > > > "Karma"??? Is that like 'a force' that travels in the air like a boomberang???? Comes alllllll theeee wayyyyyyyy around and hits you on the head, is that right? > > > I once did a test and observation on "Karma", doesn't work, it's wrong..whatever you think it is, it's wrong, doesn't work. There is no Karma. > Did you miss the part where I implied "I don't debate with idiots" chuckle another idiot that is also a dumb-fuck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-10 11:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5669D1DB.727@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279795 |
David Staup wrote: > > On 12/9/2015 2:13 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > David Staup wrote: > >> > >> On 12/8/2015 1:04 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > >>> On 12/8/15 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > >>>> How many times have you heard that? > >>> > >>> > >>> It is not the number of times you hear it that makes it so, > >>> but the consistency between observations and theory that > >>> make "no edge" logical and compelling. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> So just so we're clear here > >> > >> where is that consistency in your climate theories? > >> > >> only idiots will debate other idiots > >> > >> and more often than not expose their idiocy such as you did here > >> > >> Hoisted by your own petard.... Karma at its very best > > > > > > "Karma"??? Is that like 'a force' that travels in the air like a boomberang???? Comes alllllll theeee wayyyyyyyy around and hits you on the head, is that right? > > > > > > I once did a test and observation on "Karma", doesn't work, it's wrong..whatever you think it is, it's wrong, doesn't work. There is no Karma. > > > Did you miss the part where I implied "I don't debate with idiots" > > chuckle another idiot that is also a dumb-fuck When you pull the curtain to look out your window...how many idiots do you see out there????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-12 09:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qmio6b5f88ojnmoq33rgcj42188jo3v1eg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279797 |
I SEE YOU, DUMBASS! WE DID HAVE ANOTHER ONE LEAVE YESTERDAY! I HOPE THAT'S THE LAST TIME! Saul Levy On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:26:19 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >When you pull the curtain to look out your window...how many idiots do >you see out there????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-18 06:45 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n50v1c$275$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #279797 |
On 12/10/2015 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > David Staup wrote: >> >> On 12/9/2015 2:13 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> David Staup wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/8/2015 1:04 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>>> On 12/8/15 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> "There Is No Edge To The Universe". >>>>>> How many times have you heard that? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is not the number of times you hear it that makes it so, >>>>> but the consistency between observations and theory that >>>>> make "no edge" logical and compelling. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> So just so we're clear here >>>> >>>> where is that consistency in your climate theories? >>>> >>>> only idiots will debate other idiots >>>> >>>> and more often than not expose their idiocy such as you did here >>>> >>>> Hoisted by your own petard.... Karma at its very best >>> >>> >>> "Karma"??? Is that like 'a force' that travels in the air like a boomberang???? Comes alllllll theeee wayyyyyyyy around and hits you on the head, is that right? >>> >>> >>> I once did a test and observation on "Karma", doesn't work, it's wrong..whatever you think it is, it's wrong, doesn't work. There is no Karma. >>> >> Did you miss the part where I implied "I don't debate with idiots" >> >> chuckle another idiot that is also a dumb-fuck > > > When you pull the curtain to look out your window...how many idiots do > you see out there???? > chuckle I live in the country. When I look out my window I see a lake and often wildlife I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you were speaking metaphorically, that's easy..... 80% are playing with to few neurons... just like you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-18 10:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <567455A4.5B56@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279957 |
David Staup wrote: > > On 12/10/2015 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > David Staup wrote: > >> > >> On 12/9/2015 2:13 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> David Staup wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 12/8/2015 1:04 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > >>>>> On 12/8/15 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>> "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > >>>>>> How many times have you heard that? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> It is not the number of times you hear it that makes it so, > >>>>> but the consistency between observations and theory that > >>>>> make "no edge" logical and compelling. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> So just so we're clear here > >>>> > >>>> where is that consistency in your climate theories? > >>>> > >>>> only idiots will debate other idiots > >>>> > >>>> and more often than not expose their idiocy such as you did here > >>>> > >>>> Hoisted by your own petard.... Karma at its very best > >>> > >>> > >>> "Karma"??? Is that like 'a force' that travels in the air like a boomberang???? Comes alllllll theeee wayyyyyyyy around and hits you on the head, is that right? > >>> > >>> > >>> I once did a test and observation on "Karma", doesn't work, it's wrong..whatever you think it is, it's wrong, doesn't work. There is no Karma. > >>> > >> Did you miss the part where I implied "I don't debate with idiots" > >> > >> chuckle another idiot that is also a dumb-fuck > > > > > > When you pull the curtain to look out your window...how many idiots do > > you see out there???? > > > chuckle > > I live in the country. When I look out my window I see a lake and often > wildlife > > I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you were speaking > metaphorically, that's easy..... 80% are playing with to few neurons... > just like you That's around five billion six hundred million people on earth you view as idiots....from your window.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 13:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <psfb7blimn5mg7au5t728f4kfjp1f029e7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279968 |
ANOTHER FRAUD! Saul Levy On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:51:16 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >David Staup wrote: >> >> On 12/10/2015 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> > David Staup wrote: >> >> >> >> On 12/9/2015 2:13 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >>> David Staup wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> On 12/8/2015 1:04 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >> >>>>> On 12/8/15 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >>>>>> "There Is No Edge To The Universe". >> >>>>>> How many times have you heard that? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> It is not the number of times you hear it that makes it so, >> >>>>> but the consistency between observations and theory that >> >>>>> make "no edge" logical and compelling. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> So just so we're clear here >> >>>> >> >>>> where is that consistency in your climate theories? >> >>>> >> >>>> only idiots will debate other idiots >> >>>> >> >>>> and more often than not expose their idiocy such as you did here >> >>>> >> >>>> Hoisted by your own petard.... Karma at its very best >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> "Karma"??? Is that like 'a force' that travels in the air like a boomberang???? Comes alllllll theeee wayyyyyyyy around and hits you on the head, is that right? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I once did a test and observation on "Karma", doesn't work, it's wrong..whatever you think it is, it's wrong, doesn't work. There is no Karma. >> >>> >> >> Did you miss the part where I implied "I don't debate with idiots" >> >> >> >> chuckle another idiot that is also a dumb-fuck >> > >> > >> > When you pull the curtain to look out your window...how many idiots do >> > you see out there???? >> > >> chuckle >> >> I live in the country. When I look out my window I see a lake and often >> wildlife >> >> I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you were speaking >> metaphorically, that's easy..... 80% are playing with to few neurons... >> just like you > > > >That's around five billion six hundred million people on earth you view >as idiots....from your window.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 21:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56763E2B.A8F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279968 |
...and this idea that it goes on 'forever'.. is ridiculous. Like a a perpetually machine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-18 16:12 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n520da$5dd$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #279957 |
>>> Did you miss the part where I implied "I don't debate with idiots" >>> >>> chuckle another idiot that is also a dumb-fuck >> >> >> When you pull the curtain to look out your window...how many idiots do >> you see out there???? >> > chuckle > only one other uses "chuckle", and that is John Gabriel - mean spirited math troll promoting obviously flawed math on fake websites, he knows very little math. JG uses lots of fake names and argues with himself online too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-10 12:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5669E6E3.5CC7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279795 |
David Staup wrote: > > On 12/9/2015 2:13 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > David Staup wrote: > >> > >> On 12/8/2015 1:04 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > >>> On 12/8/15 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > >>>> How many times have you heard that? > >>> > >>> > >>> It is not the number of times you hear it that makes it so, > >>> but the consistency between observations and theory that > >>> make "no edge" logical and compelling. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> So just so we're clear here > >> > >> where is that consistency in your climate theories? > >> > >> only idiots will debate other idiots > >> > >> and more often than not expose their idiocy such as you did here > >> > >> Hoisted by your own petard.... Karma at its very best > > > > > > "Karma"??? Is that like 'a force' that travels in the air like a boomberang???? Comes alllllll theeee wayyyyyyyy around and hits you on the head, is that right? > > > > > > I once did a test and observation on "Karma", doesn't work, it's wrong..whatever you think it is, it's wrong, doesn't work. There is no Karma. > > > Did you miss the part where I implied "I don't debate with idiots" > > chuckle another idiot that is also a dumb-fuck I mean, I'm just tryin to understand this thing you brouhgt up called "Karma". What's the physics behind it? What kind of force is it? How does it go around and ...come around ..back? I just don't understand it. I don't even understand the kind of people who believe in...Karma! Is it religious?? I once threw a ball against the wall and it came back and hit me on the head...is that it? Is that Karma at its very best? Help me out with this... is it an electro-magenetic force, or a electro-gravity force??? what kind of force is it???? maybe i hit the nail on the head...it's some kind of force that what goes up must come down or back around, with a touch of magnetic electic gravity...is that it, am i a fuckin genuis or what?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-12 09:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8jio6blhpk36119i6glhh4bln9170hhlul@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279801 |
YOU SURE AREN'T A GENIUS, FUCKING FAKER! LOOK HOW IT'S SPELLED, DUMBASSHOLE! Saul Levy On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:56:03 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >I mean, I'm just tryin to understand this thing you brouhgt up called "Karma". > >What's the physics behind it? What kind of force is it? > >How does it go around and ...come around ..back? > >I just don't understand it. > >I don't even understand the kind of people who believe in...Karma! Is it religious?? > >I once threw a ball against the wall and it came back and hit me on the head...is that it? Is that Karma at its very best? > > >Help me out with this... > > >is it an electro-magenetic force, or a electro-gravity force??? what kind of force is it???? > >maybe i hit the nail on the head...it's some kind of force that what goes up must come down or back around, with >a touch of magnetic electic gravity...is that it, am i a fuckin genuis or what?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-18 14:28 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n51qad$ml6$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #279801 |
On 12/10/2015 2:56 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> > ...is that it, am i a fuckin genuis or what? > if you think you are, you should go on Jerry Springer and display your genuis there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 15:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5668B7A9.550B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279748 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > The early universe should have been very hot. As I mentioned before.... the big bang was the explosion of MORE space... not more heat. Actually, space is cold. You people seem to be stuck in the middle ages.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 21:13 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <i62dnSarZ4N9cPXLnZ2dnUU7-N-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #279780 |
On 12/9/15 5:22 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > the big bang was the explosion of MORE space... > > not more heat. > > Actually, space is cold. The universe as a whole is pretty cold now. During the cosmic expansion, the universe has cooled from billions of degrees in the fist second to 2.7 K currently. Tests of Big Bang Cosmology http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests.html The Big Bang Model is supported by a number of important observations, each of which are described in more detail on separate pages: 1. The expansion of the universe http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_exp.html Edwin Hubble's 1929 observation that galaxies were generally receding from us provided the first clue that the Big Bang theory might be right. 2. The abundance of the light elements H, He, Li http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_ele.html The Big Bang theory predicts that these light elements should have been fused from protons and neutrons in the first few minutes after the Big Bang. 3. The cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_cmb.html The early universe should have been very hot. The cosmic microwave background radiation is the remnant heat leftover from the Big Bang. These three measurable signatures strongly support the notion that the universe evolved from a dense, nearly featureless hot gas, just as the Big Bang model predicts. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 19:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5668F5C8.19CD@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279783 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 12/9/15 5:22 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > the big bang was the explosion of MORE space... > > > > not more heat. > > > > Actually, space is cold. > > The universe as a whole is pretty cold now. It was never hot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web