Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #279745 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-12-20 10:44 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 92 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-08 11:48 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 13:04 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 18:01 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-09 11:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:30 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:26 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-12 09:28 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-18 06:45 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 10:51 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-19 13:36 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 21:35 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-18 16:12 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 12:56 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-12 09:26 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-18 14:28 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:22 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:13 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 19:47 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:51 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 22:06 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 00:04 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:32 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:29 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 22:02 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-11 07:48 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-11 13:54 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 22:55 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 07:54 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 09:16 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 19:47 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2015-12-13 09:06 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 07:01 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-21 05:45 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 14:03 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-08 17:42 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-12-08 22:07 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-09 05:38 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-09 12:07 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-12-09 06:42 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-11 22:39 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 19:46 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 22:50 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-09 05:54 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 09:09 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:07 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:46 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-10 07:19 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-10 18:10 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 00:01 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 08:44 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 22:44 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 08:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:00 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 18:30 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 17:45 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-17 19:24 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-17 19:25 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-16 11:44 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:20 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-17 17:13 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:47 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 12:26 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 09:52 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:11 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:28 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 22:58 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 23:14 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 10:51 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 07:57 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 10:48 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 11:00 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-18 22:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-19 13:40 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 16:52 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-25 08:40 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 23:01 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 10:20 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 12:31 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 11:31 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 14:19 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-29 13:37 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-31 14:56 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-30 18:06 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-06 12:23 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 15:12 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-19 13:34 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 11:02 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-18 11:06 -0700
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "G=EMC^2TreBert" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 10:44 -0800
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 06:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n4942g$49f$1@panix2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #279757 |
In article <23a42$566786c7$453ebb0b$15481@EVERESTKC.NET>, =?iso-8859-1?B?SORnYXI=?= <hsahm@yahoo.com> said: > *** So, there's a brick wall out there somewhere, with a sign saying > something like "do not trespass under penalty of eternal hell > damnation" ??? The standard joke is that there's a wall and if you put your ear to it you can hear a really good party going on on the other side. -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-11 22:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <VdidnS2TbLlmOfbLnZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #279768 |
On 2015-12-09, William December Starr <wdstarr@panix.com> wrote: >=?iso-8859-1?B?SORnYXI=?= <hsahm@yahoo.com> said: >> *** So, there's a brick wall out there somewhere, with a sign saying >> something like "do not trespass under penalty of eternal hell damnation" ??? > > The standard joke is that there's a wall and if you put your ear to > it you can hear a really good party going on on the other side. Is this where we entice Quadliboc to watch Behind the Green Door on youtube? Dave, dn pua s!yL -- \/David DeLaney posting thru EarthLink - "It's not the pot that grows the flower It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK> http://gatekeeper.vic.com/~dbd/ -net.legends/Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-08 19:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5667A40D.4C3F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279745 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > > How many times have you heard that? > > It seems... > there is a small group of people.. > in the 'scientific community'.. > there is this ..belief or opinion, that > "There is no edge to the universe". > > They, go as far as telling everyone > "There is no edge to the universe". > > They will get together > and come up with > all kinds of explanations, > and numbers, to Why and How > "There is no edge to the universe". > > It's like a mantra. > "There is no edge to the universe" > "There is no edge to the universe" > "There is no edge to the universe" > > And if you disagree with them... > they will have you shot! > > So, why the mantra? > > Who discovered that there > is no edge to the universe? > > Did they send Columbus to look?? > > They will have you believe that > the universe is infinite. That is just > a ploy to have you believe... > "There is no edge to the universe". > > Get it? It's a con! > > con > kän/ > > 1. > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. > > noun > noun: con; plural noun: cons > > 1. > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. > > The Question of course is...what is behind these people > from trying to convince everyone that > there is no edge to the universe? > > Why are they trying to deceive you? > > The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. Keep in mind... that the question is not, whether or not there is an edge to the universe.. the question is, Why the insistence by the 'scientific community' that "There is no edge to the universe"? The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-08 22:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5667CF3A.6B9A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279760 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > > > > How many times have you heard that? > > > > It seems... > > there is a small group of people.. > > in the 'scientific community'.. > > there is this ..belief or opinion, that > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > They, go as far as telling everyone > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > They will get together > > and come up with > > all kinds of explanations, > > and numbers, to Why and How > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > It's like a mantra. > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > > > And if you disagree with them... > > they will have you shot! > > > > So, why the mantra? > > > > Who discovered that there > > is no edge to the universe? > > > > Did they send Columbus to look?? > > > > They will have you believe that > > the universe is infinite. That is just > > a ploy to have you believe... > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > Get it? It's a con! > > > > con > > kän/ > > > > 1. > > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. > > > > noun > > noun: con; plural noun: cons > > > > 1. > > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. > > > > The Question of course is...what is behind these people > > from trying to convince everyone that > > there is no edge to the universe? > > > > Why are they trying to deceive you? > > > > The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > Keep in mind... > that the question is not, > whether or not > there is an edge > to the universe.. > > the question is, > Why the insistence > by the 'scientific community' that > "There is no edge to the universe"? > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. ...i don't want to go off topic but... it goes the same mantra for "There Is No Center To The Universe" not like if there is a human today capable of figuring out how to see the center.... tools not yet invented...but it's a con neverless to say ...There Is No Center To The Universe or There Is No Edge To The Universe. The tradgey is that there are proffesors teaching this stuff to kids today. the question is... Why the insistence by the 'scientific community' to tell everyone.. "There is no edge to the universe"? Why? The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 05:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <v09g6b1adp5ne0bbg1b49qeblria98nftv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279764 |
YOU WENT TO THE SAME SCHOOL (BEZERKLEY) AS ARCieSHITHEAD, DIDN'T YOU, FAKER? IT SHOWS! Saul Levy On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 22:50:34 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >The Starmaker wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >> > >> > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". >> > >> > How many times have you heard that? >> > >> > It seems... >> > there is a small group of people.. >> > in the 'scientific community'.. >> > there is this ..belief or opinion, that >> > "There is no edge to the universe". >> > >> > They, go as far as telling everyone >> > "There is no edge to the universe". >> > >> > They will get together >> > and come up with >> > all kinds of explanations, >> > and numbers, to Why and How >> > "There is no edge to the universe". >> > >> > It's like a mantra. >> > "There is no edge to the universe" >> > "There is no edge to the universe" >> > "There is no edge to the universe" >> > >> > And if you disagree with them... >> > they will have you shot! >> > >> > So, why the mantra? >> > >> > Who discovered that there >> > is no edge to the universe? >> > >> > Did they send Columbus to look?? >> > >> > They will have you believe that >> > the universe is infinite. That is just >> > a ploy to have you believe... >> > "There is no edge to the universe". >> > >> > Get it? It's a con! >> > >> > con >> > kän/ >> > >> > 1. >> > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. >> > >> > noun >> > noun: con; plural noun: cons >> > >> > 1. >> > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. >> > >> > The Question of course is...what is behind these people >> > from trying to convince everyone that >> > there is no edge to the universe? >> > >> > Why are they trying to deceive you? >> > >> > The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. >> > >> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >> > the unchallengeable. >> >> Keep in mind... >> that the question is not, >> whether or not >> there is an edge >> to the universe.. >> >> the question is, >> Why the insistence >> by the 'scientific community' that >> "There is no edge to the universe"? >> >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >> the unchallengeable. > > > >...i don't want to go off topic but... >it goes the same mantra for "There Is No Center To The Universe" > >not like if there is a human today capable of figuring out how to see the center.... >tools not yet invented...but it's a con neverless to say ...There Is No Center To The Universe > >or There Is No Edge To The Universe. > > >The tradgey is that there are proffesors teaching this stuff to kids today. > > > the question is... > Why the insistence > by the 'scientific community' >to tell everyone.. > "There is no edge to the universe"? > >Why? > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 09:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <WOWdnbD325fd2fXLnZ2dnUU7-IWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #279764 |
On 12/9/15 12:50 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > The tradgey is that there are proffesors teaching this stuff to kids today. Thank goodness that the professors expose their students to the hard data of observation and experiment. And teach the students the tools of mathematics and physics. Classical Mechanics is a excellent prerequisite for advance courses. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 12:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56688A19.1BFF@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279764 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > > > > > > How many times have you heard that? > > > > > > It seems... > > > there is a small group of people.. > > > in the 'scientific community'.. > > > there is this ..belief or opinion, that > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > They, go as far as telling everyone > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > They will get together > > > and come up with > > > all kinds of explanations, > > > and numbers, to Why and How > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > It's like a mantra. > > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > > > > > And if you disagree with them... > > > they will have you shot! > > > > > > So, why the mantra? > > > > > > Who discovered that there > > > is no edge to the universe? > > > > > > Did they send Columbus to look?? > > > > > > They will have you believe that > > > the universe is infinite. That is just > > > a ploy to have you believe... > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > Get it? It's a con! > > > > > > con > > > kän/ > > > > > > 1. > > > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. > > > > > > noun > > > noun: con; plural noun: cons > > > > > > 1. > > > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. > > > > > > The Question of course is...what is behind these people > > > from trying to convince everyone that > > > there is no edge to the universe? > > > > > > Why are they trying to deceive you? > > > > > > The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > Keep in mind... > > that the question is not, > > whether or not > > there is an edge > > to the universe.. > > > > the question is, > > Why the insistence > > by the 'scientific community' that > > "There is no edge to the universe"? > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > ...i don't want to go off topic but... > it goes the same mantra for "There Is No Center To The Universe" > > not like if there is a human today capable of figuring out how to see the center.... > tools not yet invented...but it's a con neverless to say ...There Is No Center To The Universe > > or There Is No Edge To The Universe. > > The tradgey is that there are proffesors teaching this stuff to kids today. > > the question is... > Why the insistence > by the 'scientific community' > to tell everyone.. > "There is no edge to the universe"? > > Why? > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. I'll tell you Why... it is a pattern with 'these people', (the 'scientific community') When they say..."There is no...." it means you are not suppose to question it any further. When they say "There Is No Edge To The Universe".. they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is an edge. If they say "There is no Before." they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is a before. If they say "There Is No Center To The Universe".. they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is a center of the universe. The truth is...they don't know where the fuck the center is at! They don't even know how to fuckin look for it. They don't have the tools to look for it. And they don't want you to ask anymore. And if you dare ask...they'll fuckin shoot you! The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-09 15:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5668BD6D.33EC@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279777 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > > > > > > > > How many times have you heard that? > > > > > > > > It seems... > > > > there is a small group of people.. > > > > in the 'scientific community'.. > > > > there is this ..belief or opinion, that > > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > > > They, go as far as telling everyone > > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > > > They will get together > > > > and come up with > > > > all kinds of explanations, > > > > and numbers, to Why and How > > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > > > It's like a mantra. > > > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > > > > > > > And if you disagree with them... > > > > they will have you shot! > > > > > > > > So, why the mantra? > > > > > > > > Who discovered that there > > > > is no edge to the universe? > > > > > > > > Did they send Columbus to look?? > > > > > > > > They will have you believe that > > > > the universe is infinite. That is just > > > > a ploy to have you believe... > > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > > > Get it? It's a con! > > > > > > > > con > > > > kän/ > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. > > > > > > > > noun > > > > noun: con; plural noun: cons > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. > > > > > > > > The Question of course is...what is behind these people > > > > from trying to convince everyone that > > > > there is no edge to the universe? > > > > > > > > Why are they trying to deceive you? > > > > > > > > The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > Keep in mind... > > > that the question is not, > > > whether or not > > > there is an edge > > > to the universe.. > > > > > > the question is, > > > Why the insistence > > > by the 'scientific community' that > > > "There is no edge to the universe"? > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > ...i don't want to go off topic but... > > it goes the same mantra for "There Is No Center To The Universe" > > > > not like if there is a human today capable of figuring out how to see the center.... > > tools not yet invented...but it's a con neverless to say ...There Is No Center To The Universe > > > > or There Is No Edge To The Universe. > > > > The tradgey is that there are proffesors teaching this stuff to kids today. > > > > the question is... > > Why the insistence > > by the 'scientific community' > > to tell everyone.. > > "There is no edge to the universe"? > > > > Why? > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > I'll tell you Why... > > it is a pattern with 'these people', (the 'scientific community') > > When they say..."There is no...." > > it means you are not suppose to question it any further. > > When they say "There Is No Edge To The Universe".. > > they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is an edge. > > If they say "There is no Before." > > they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is a before. > > If they say "There Is No Center To The Universe".. > > they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is a center of the universe. > > The truth is...they don't know where the fuck the center is at! They don't even know how to > fuckin look for it. They don't have the tools to look for it. And they don't want you to ask anymore. > > And if you dare ask...they'll fuckin shoot you! > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. lemme put it differently... the 'scientific community' has a choice...either to say, "There Is No Edge To The Universe" or to say "There Is An Edge To The Universe" if they choose the latter.. then everybody would be asking... "What is on the other side of the edge????" To avoid having to answer questions they have no answers too, they decided to say... "There Is No Edge To The Universe, Motherfucker"! The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-10 07:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ta2j6bh0kt320jmqkivtmkuf56dcdc5j7h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279781 |
ALL YOU ARE IS A FAKER FRAUD, FAKER! ARE STARS HOT? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! IDIOT! YOU HAVE REPLACED BEERTLAMEbrain AS OUR RESIDENT IDIOT! Saul Levy On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:46:53 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >The Starmaker wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >> > >> > The Starmaker wrote: >> > > >> > > The Starmaker wrote: >> > > > >> > > > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". >> > > > >> > > > How many times have you heard that? >> > > > >> > > > It seems... >> > > > there is a small group of people.. >> > > > in the 'scientific community'.. >> > > > there is this ..belief or opinion, that >> > > > "There is no edge to the universe". >> > > > >> > > > They, go as far as telling everyone >> > > > "There is no edge to the universe". >> > > > >> > > > They will get together >> > > > and come up with >> > > > all kinds of explanations, >> > > > and numbers, to Why and How >> > > > "There is no edge to the universe". >> > > > >> > > > It's like a mantra. >> > > > "There is no edge to the universe" >> > > > "There is no edge to the universe" >> > > > "There is no edge to the universe" >> > > > >> > > > And if you disagree with them... >> > > > they will have you shot! >> > > > >> > > > So, why the mantra? >> > > > >> > > > Who discovered that there >> > > > is no edge to the universe? >> > > > >> > > > Did they send Columbus to look?? >> > > > >> > > > They will have you believe that >> > > > the universe is infinite. That is just >> > > > a ploy to have you believe... >> > > > "There is no edge to the universe". >> > > > >> > > > Get it? It's a con! >> > > > >> > > > con >> > > > kän/ >> > > > >> > > > 1. >> > > > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. >> > > > >> > > > noun >> > > > noun: con; plural noun: cons >> > > > >> > > > 1. >> > > > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. >> > > > >> > > > The Question of course is...what is behind these people >> > > > from trying to convince everyone that >> > > > there is no edge to the universe? >> > > > >> > > > Why are they trying to deceive you? >> > > > >> > > > The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. >> > > > >> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >> > > > the unchallengeable. >> > > >> > > Keep in mind... >> > > that the question is not, >> > > whether or not >> > > there is an edge >> > > to the universe.. >> > > >> > > the question is, >> > > Why the insistence >> > > by the 'scientific community' that >> > > "There is no edge to the universe"? >> > > >> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >> > > the unchallengeable. >> > >> > ...i don't want to go off topic but... >> > it goes the same mantra for "There Is No Center To The Universe" >> > >> > not like if there is a human today capable of figuring out how to see the center.... >> > tools not yet invented...but it's a con neverless to say ...There Is No Center To The Universe >> > >> > or There Is No Edge To The Universe. >> > >> > The tradgey is that there are proffesors teaching this stuff to kids today. >> > >> > the question is... >> > Why the insistence >> > by the 'scientific community' >> > to tell everyone.. >> > "There is no edge to the universe"? >> > >> > Why? >> > >> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >> > the unchallengeable. >> >> I'll tell you Why... >> >> it is a pattern with 'these people', (the 'scientific community') >> >> When they say..."There is no...." >> >> it means you are not suppose to question it any further. >> >> When they say "There Is No Edge To The Universe".. >> >> they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is an edge. >> >> If they say "There is no Before." >> >> they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is a before. >> >> If they say "There Is No Center To The Universe".. >> >> they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is a center of the universe. >> >> The truth is...they don't know where the fuck the center is at! They don't even know how to >> fuckin look for it. They don't have the tools to look for it. And they don't want you to ask anymore. >> >> And if you dare ask...they'll fuckin shoot you! >> >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >> the unchallengeable. > > >lemme put it differently... > >the 'scientific community' has >a choice...either to say, > >"There Is No Edge To The Universe" > >or to say > >"There Is An Edge To The Universe" > > >if they choose the latter.. > >then everybody would be asking... > > >"What is on the other side of the edge????" > > >To avoid having to answer questions they have no answers too, >they decided to say... > >"There Is No Edge To The Universe, Motherfucker"! > > > > >The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-10 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n4cbid$uu7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #279791 |
Right All are fakers and liars, whose time is at hand... Saul. Remember the Promise... Ezekiel 3:12 Then the Spirit lifted me up, and I heard behind me a loud rumbling sound as the glory of the Lord rose from the place where it was standing.[a] 13 It was the sound of the wings of the living creatures brushing against each other and the sound of the wheels beside them, a loud rumbling sound. I love those wheels and rhythm's And you up there, who flew in 2004 above my head, on that December night and the prophecy fulfilled it self, the heaven would open on that ramadam night(Opening the gates of heaven) you fulfilled it and I knew that when I saw your eyes, because that close you was... Yes you who persecuted me. Thanks man... You saved the world of cometh doom and from low fallen man(demons) of great deceive!!! And I can rise up on my feet again and fight on your side... I was deep down alone, on that lonely road and your helping hand came as a surprise out of nothing on that Via Dolorosa and just in time(I did see something was up, but did not know if it was good or bad)... and it's exactly as written down in the book, how it should be done... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWsdBwKowLE Number 7 of her Majesty, previously know as number 6, The prisoner Of. but I am not a number anymore... Now I am a free man https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsptrgBPvZw The Sheriff of Brussels... Warrior... Warrior of the Light. God Save the Pirate Queen.. http://dailyhadith.abuaminaelias.com/2011/08/03/the-gates-of-heaven-are-open-for-the-month-of-ramadan/ On 10/12/2015 15:19, Saul Levy wrote: > ALL YOU ARE IS A FAKER FRAUD, FAKER! > > ARE STARS HOT? > > BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > IDIOT! > > YOU HAVE REPLACED BEERTLAMEbrain AS OUR RESIDENT IDIOT! > > Saul Levy > > > On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:46:53 -0800, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> "There Is No Edge To The Universe". >>>>>> >>>>>> How many times have you heard that? >>>>>> >>>>>> It seems... >>>>>> there is a small group of people.. >>>>>> in the 'scientific community'.. >>>>>> there is this ..belief or opinion, that >>>>>> "There is no edge to the universe". >>>>>> >>>>>> They, go as far as telling everyone >>>>>> "There is no edge to the universe". >>>>>> >>>>>> They will get together >>>>>> and come up with >>>>>> all kinds of explanations, >>>>>> and numbers, to Why and How >>>>>> "There is no edge to the universe". >>>>>> >>>>>> It's like a mantra. >>>>>> "There is no edge to the universe" >>>>>> "There is no edge to the universe" >>>>>> "There is no edge to the universe" >>>>>> >>>>>> And if you disagree with them... >>>>>> they will have you shot! >>>>>> >>>>>> So, why the mantra? >>>>>> >>>>>> Who discovered that there >>>>>> is no edge to the universe? >>>>>> >>>>>> Did they send Columbus to look?? >>>>>> >>>>>> They will have you believe that >>>>>> the universe is infinite. That is just >>>>>> a ploy to have you believe... >>>>>> "There is no edge to the universe". >>>>>> >>>>>> Get it? It's a con! >>>>>> >>>>>> con >>>>>> kän/ >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. >>>>>> persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. >>>>>> >>>>>> noun >>>>>> noun: con; plural noun: cons >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. >>>>>> an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Question of course is...what is behind these people >>>>>> from trying to convince everyone that >>>>>> there is no edge to the universe? >>>>>> >>>>>> Why are they trying to deceive you? >>>>>> >>>>>> The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >>>>>> the unchallengeable. >>>>> >>>>> Keep in mind... >>>>> that the question is not, >>>>> whether or not >>>>> there is an edge >>>>> to the universe.. >>>>> >>>>> the question is, >>>>> Why the insistence >>>>> by the 'scientific community' that >>>>> "There is no edge to the universe"? >>>>> >>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >>>>> the unchallengeable. >>>> >>>> ...i don't want to go off topic but... >>>> it goes the same mantra for "There Is No Center To The Universe" >>>> >>>> not like if there is a human today capable of figuring out how to see the center.... >>>> tools not yet invented...but it's a con neverless to say ...There Is No Center To The Universe >>>> >>>> or There Is No Edge To The Universe. >>>> >>>> The tradgey is that there are proffesors teaching this stuff to kids today. >>>> >>>> the question is... >>>> Why the insistence >>>> by the 'scientific community' >>>> to tell everyone.. >>>> "There is no edge to the universe"? >>>> >>>> Why? >>>> >>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >>>> the unchallengeable. >>> >>> I'll tell you Why... >>> >>> it is a pattern with 'these people', (the 'scientific community') >>> >>> When they say..."There is no...." >>> >>> it means you are not suppose to question it any further. >>> >>> When they say "There Is No Edge To The Universe".. >>> >>> they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is an edge. >>> >>> If they say "There is no Before." >>> >>> they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is a before. >>> >>> If they say "There Is No Center To The Universe".. >>> >>> they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is a center of the universe. >>> >>> The truth is...they don't know where the fuck the center is at! They don't even know how to >>> fuckin look for it. They don't have the tools to look for it. And they don't want you to ask anymore. >>> >>> And if you dare ask...they'll fuckin shoot you! >>> >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >>> the unchallengeable. >> >> >> lemme put it differently... >> >> the 'scientific community' has >> a choice...either to say, >> >> "There Is No Edge To The Universe" >> >> or to say >> >> "There Is An Edge To The Universe" >> >> >> if they choose the latter.. >> >> then everybody would be asking... >> >> >> "What is on the other side of the edge????" >> >> >> To avoid having to answer questions they have no answers too, >> they decided to say... >> >> "There Is No Edge To The Universe, Motherfucker"! >> >> >> >> >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge >> the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-15 00:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <566FC8EA.DD6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279781 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > > > > > > > > > > How many times have you heard that? > > > > > > > > > > It seems... > > > > > there is a small group of people.. > > > > > in the 'scientific community'.. > > > > > there is this ..belief or opinion, that > > > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > > > > > They, go as far as telling everyone > > > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > > > > > They will get together > > > > > and come up with > > > > > all kinds of explanations, > > > > > and numbers, to Why and How > > > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > > > > > It's like a mantra. > > > > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > > > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > > > > "There is no edge to the universe" > > > > > > > > > > And if you disagree with them... > > > > > they will have you shot! > > > > > > > > > > So, why the mantra? > > > > > > > > > > Who discovered that there > > > > > is no edge to the universe? > > > > > > > > > > Did they send Columbus to look?? > > > > > > > > > > They will have you believe that > > > > > the universe is infinite. That is just > > > > > a ploy to have you believe... > > > > > "There is no edge to the universe". > > > > > > > > > > Get it? It's a con! > > > > > > > > > > con > > > > > kän/ > > > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. > > > > > > > > > > noun > > > > > noun: con; plural noun: cons > > > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. > > > > > > > > > > The Question of course is...what is behind these people > > > > > from trying to convince everyone that > > > > > there is no edge to the universe? > > > > > > > > > > Why are they trying to deceive you? > > > > > > > > > > The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > Keep in mind... > > > > that the question is not, > > > > whether or not > > > > there is an edge > > > > to the universe.. > > > > > > > > the question is, > > > > Why the insistence > > > > by the 'scientific community' that > > > > "There is no edge to the universe"? > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > ...i don't want to go off topic but... > > > it goes the same mantra for "There Is No Center To The Universe" > > > > > > not like if there is a human today capable of figuring out how to see the center.... > > > tools not yet invented...but it's a con neverless to say ...There Is No Center To The Universe > > > > > > or There Is No Edge To The Universe. > > > > > > The tradgey is that there are proffesors teaching this stuff to kids today. > > > > > > the question is... > > > Why the insistence > > > by the 'scientific community' > > > to tell everyone.. > > > "There is no edge to the universe"? > > > > > > Why? > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > I'll tell you Why... > > > > it is a pattern with 'these people', (the 'scientific community') > > > > When they say..."There is no...." > > > > it means you are not suppose to question it any further. > > > > When they say "There Is No Edge To The Universe".. > > > > they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is an edge. > > > > If they say "There is no Before." > > > > they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is a before. > > > > If they say "There Is No Center To The Universe".. > > > > they are saying 'in fact'..don't ask if there is a center of the universe. > > > > The truth is...they don't know where the fuck the center is at! They don't even know how to > > fuckin look for it. They don't have the tools to look for it. And they don't want you to ask anymore. > > > > And if you dare ask...they'll fuckin shoot you! > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > lemme put it differently... > > the 'scientific community' has > a choice...either to say, > > "There Is No Edge To The Universe" > > or to say > > "There Is An Edge To The Universe" > > if they choose the latter.. > > then everybody would be asking... > > "What is on the other side of the edge????" > > To avoid having to answer questions they have no answers too, > they decided to say... > > "There Is No Edge To The Universe, Motherfucker"! > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. Okay...yous seem to be having trouble...picturing an edge to the universe. How about... take the Universe.. the whole Universe.. what I mean is the entire Universe and everyhting that is contain in it. Everything in the entire universe that is contained in it. From top to bottom. From one edge of the entire universe to the other side of the entire universe. The whole shabam! Eveything in it!! Everything contained in it. 'contained in it.' contained in
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-15 08:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <CIednapTN82tuu3LnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #279879 |
On 12/15/15 2:01 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > Okay...yous seem to be having trouble...picturing an edge to the > universe. And rightly so, as there is no edge. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-15 22:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5671083C.135D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279879 |
David DeLaney wrote: > > On 2015-12-15, Stephen Allcroft <stephenallcroft@lycos.co.uk> wrote: > > Starmaker wants an end to the universe. He's looking in the spacial > > dimensions. He won't find it there. It's the other dimension where the end is > > going to be. > > so i hear you saying > TIME MUST HAVE A STOP! > ? > > Dave, will callback for food > -- > \/David DeLaney posting thru EarthLink - "It's not the pot that grows the flower > It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see > Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK> > http://gatekeeper.vic.com/~dbd/ -net.legends/Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K. Well of course Time must have a stop... Time stops every second, and then it stars again. Eventually, Time will begin to unwind... and when no one wounds the clock..Time will stop.. just about the time it reaches the edge.. just in time. Beyond the edge there is no time.. as there was no time before the begining. The Timemaker It's not tick tock, it's tic, tic, tic...tic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-16 08:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <mtWdnVEkxqL86uzLnZ2dnUU7-f-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #279903 |
On 12/16/15 12:44 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Time stops every second, and then it stars again.
## #
## #
#########################################
#########################################
## ######
## ##########
############
##############
#############
#############
##############
#############
##############
#############
##############
############# #
############# #
#########################################
#########################################
#
########
###############
##################
#####################
#### ####
## ##
## ##
## ##
## ###
## ##
#### ####
#####################
##################
###############
########
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 15:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56733E8C.C68@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279906 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 12/16/15 12:44 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Time stops every second, and then it stars again. In other words... you can take a simple camera and capture.. a moment in time. A Kodak Moment. Or, you can take a movie camera and watch the world go by one frame at a time. If you can slow down a ...tic to a point where the next tic does not tic... time stops. Have you ever listen to a clock's last tic? Does it slow down before the last tic, or does it just stop ticking?? Where's Einstein, i gotta ask him..see what he says... He's probably say..."GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!!" Then I'll have to tell him, "You fuckin commie!!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 15:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5673417D.715F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279932 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > > > > On 12/16/15 12:44 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Time stops every second, and then it stars again. > > In other words... > > you can take a simple camera > and capture.. > a moment in time. > > A Kodak Moment. > > Or, you can take a movie camera > and watch the world > go by > one frame at a time. > > If you can slow down a ...tic > > to a point where the next tic > does not tic... > > time stops. > > Have you ever listen to a clock's last tic? > > Does it slow down before the last tic, or does it just stop ticking?? The reason why you cannot travel into the future is because.. time stops. You cannot send messages into the future because the future does not exist...yet. The future is created..each second, to keep you from jumping ahead of ...Time. When it comes to the subject of Time....I'm a fuckin expert!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 18:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <BO6dnTmCVZAkzu7LnZ2dnUU7-ROdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #279933 |
On 12/17/15 5:13 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > The reason why you cannot travel into the future is because.. > time stops. Try not to be so stooopid -- we are traveling into the future right now. > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/16/World_line.svg -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 17:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56736520.4671@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279942 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 12/17/15 5:13 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > The reason why you cannot travel into the future is because.. > > time stops. > > Try not to be so stooopid -- we are traveling into the future > right now. > > all at the same time? one second at a time? can i jump in front of you, i want to see you arriving.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 19:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9hr67b9kqq728mlhs83mr6cdbdnqpjdnub@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279933 |
WRONG AGAIN! WHAT YOU ARE IS JUST A FUCKING IDIOT! Saul Levy On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:13:01 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >The Starmaker wrote: >> >> Sam Wormley wrote: >> > >> > On 12/16/15 12:44 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> > > Time stops every second, and then it stars again. >> >> In other words... >> >> you can take a simple camera >> and capture.. >> a moment in time. >> >> A Kodak Moment. >> >> Or, you can take a movie camera >> and watch the world >> go by >> one frame at a time. >> >> If you can slow down a ...tic >> >> to a point where the next tic >> does not tic... >> >> time stops. >> >> Have you ever listen to a clock's last tic? >> >> Does it slow down before the last tic, or does it just stop ticking?? > > >The reason why you cannot travel into the future is because.. >time stops. > >You cannot send messages into the future because the future does not >exist...yet. > >The future is created..each second, to keep you from jumping ahead of >...Time. > >When it comes to the subject of Time....I'm a fuckin expert!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 19:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qjr67bdr1bm2nluqu2l1b536n849bclfsv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279932 |
THE FAKER: WHAT A FUCKING IMBECILE YOU ARE! Saul Levy On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:00:28 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> On 12/16/15 12:44 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> > Time stops every second, and then it stars again. > >In other words... > >you can take a simple camera >and capture.. >a moment in time. > >A Kodak Moment. > > >Or, you can take a movie camera >and watch the world >go by >one frame at a time. > >If you can slow down a ...tic > >to a point where the next tic >does not tic... > >time stops. > >Have you ever listen to a clock's last tic? > > >Does it slow down before the last tic, or does it just stop ticking?? > > >Where's Einstein, i gotta ask him..see what he says... > >He's probably say..."GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!!" > >Then I'll have to tell him, "You fuckin commie!!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web