Groups > alt.astronomy > #279248 > unrolled thread

Based On Nonsense

Started by	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post	2015-11-20 10:49 -0800
Last post	2015-11-23 19:16 -0700
Articles	20 on this page of 47 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy

  Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 10:49 -0800
    Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 11:00 -0800
      Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 17:16 -0800
        Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 00:57 -0500
          Re: 'Based On Nonsense' palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 22:34 -0800
          Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 23:11 -0800
            Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 09:30 +0100
              Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 00:41 -0800
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:40 -0500
                  Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 13:00 -0800
                    Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 07:10 +0100
                    Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 09:01 -0600
            Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2015-11-22 22:32 +0100
              Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 14:17 -0800
                Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 21:37 -0800
                  Re: Based On Nonsense Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-24 12:17 -0700
                    Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-11-24 13:41 -0600
                      Re: Based On Nonsense Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-24 13:30 -0700
                        Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-11-24 15:41 -0600
                          Re: Based On Nonsense Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-24 15:32 -0700
                      Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-24 13:01 -0800
                        Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-03 18:21 -0700
                    Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-24 22:08 -0800
                      Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 07:40 +0100
                        Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 10:24 -0800
                          Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 12:01 -0800
                      Re: Based On Nonsense Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-25 01:18 -0700
                        Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 12:58 -0800
                          Re: Based On Nonsense Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-29 12:37 -0700
                        Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-09 16:54 -0800
                          Re: 'Based On Nonsense' "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 06:48 -0600
                            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-10 07:15 -0700
                          Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-12-10 07:13 -0700
          Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-11-23 11:02 -0600
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-23 11:38 -0800
            Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-27 11:14 -0800
              Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 12:00 -0800
              Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-11-27 15:35 -0600
                Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 16:53 -0800
              Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 19:15 -0800
                Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 08:43 -0800
          Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-11-26 08:26 -0500
            Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-09 10:34 +0000
              Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-09 08:31 -0600
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-10 19:29 +0000
        Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-23 17:55 -0800
          Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-23 19:16 -0700

Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →

#279248 — Based On Nonsense

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-11-20 10:49 -0800
Subject	Based On Nonsense
Message-ID	<564F6B1C.6890@ix.netcom.com>

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#279249

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-11-20 11:00 -0800
Message-ID	<564F6DC6.127E@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#279248

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/

non·sense
'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
noun
noun: nonsense

    1.
    spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.

How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...

1) Earth-size planet

So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279300

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-11-21 17:16 -0800
Message-ID	<56511756.777C@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#279249

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
> 
> non·sense
> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
> noun
> noun: nonsense
> 
>     1.
>     spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
> 
> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
> 
> 1) Earth-size planet
> 
> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?


Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,


How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279304 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	benj <none@gmail.com>
Date	2015-11-22 00:57 -0500
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<XOc4y.155775$sK.94170@fx14.iad>
In reply to	#279300

On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
>>
>> non·sense
>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
>> noun
>> noun: nonsense
>>
>>      1.
>>      spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
>>
>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
>>
>> 1) Earth-size planet
>>
>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
>
>
> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
>
>
> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?

How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we 
see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM 
truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life 
forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea 
"kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and 
ignorant?



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279305 — Re: 'Based On Nonsense'

From	palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date	2015-11-21 22:34 -0800
Subject	Re: 'Based On Nonsense'
Message-ID	<bce18253-b7b0-4f28-8911-a1fc7f924a1d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#279304

On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 9:57:13 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:

> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we 
> see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM 
> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life 
> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea 
> "kook". 

I would agree that there is compelling evidence that alien life exists elsewhere in the universe, but why do you think that 'science' laughs and calls the idea "kook"? A quick Google search using the phrase "the probability that alien life exists" finds lots and lots of pages written by scientific publications on the subject, and while none of them declare that alien life 'absolutely' exists, most of them also agree that it is probable. A quick look does not reveal a single article from a scientific publication that calls the idea 'kook', or any similar term.

I found this article particularly interesting, give it a read...

http://www.askamathematician.com/2010/01/q-do-aliens-exist/

... and there are many other that are quite similar.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279306 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-11-21 23:11 -0800
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<56516A8D.4546@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#279304

benj wrote:
> 
> On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
> >>
> >> non·sense
> >> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
> >> noun
> >> noun: nonsense
> >>
> >>      1.
> >>      spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
> >>
> >> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
> >>
> >> 1) Earth-size planet
> >>
> >> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
> >
> >
> > Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
> >
> >
> > How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
> 
> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we
> see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM
> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life
> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea
> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and
> ignorant?

Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
system are Earth-size planets?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279307 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date	2015-11-22 09:30 +0100
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<dbdcp8Fal94U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#279306

Am 22.11.2015 08:11, schrieb The Starmaker:

>>>>       1.
>>>>       spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
>>>>
>>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
>>>>
>>>> 1) Earth-size planet
>>>>
>>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
>>>
>>>
>>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
>>
>> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we
>> see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM
>> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life
>> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea
>> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and
>> ignorant?
>
> Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
> system are Earth-size planets?

Depends on what you regard as 'Earth-size'.

At least the Earth has this size.

But roughly Mars and Venus are 'Earth-sized'.

But - in a way - all the 'stony' planets are similar in size, while 
gas-planets are much larger.



TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279308 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-11-22 00:41 -0800
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<56517FCD.2E34@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#279307

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am 22.11.2015 08:11, schrieb The Starmaker:
> 
> >>>>       1.
> >>>>       spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
> >>>>
> >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) Earth-size planet
> >>>>
> >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
> >>
> >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we
> >> see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM
> >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life
> >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea
> >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and
> >> ignorant?
> >
> > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
> > system are Earth-size planets?
> 
> Depends on what you regard as 'Earth-size'.
> 
> At least the Earth has this size.
> 
> But roughly Mars and Venus are 'Earth-sized'.
> 
> But - in a way - all the 'stony' planets are similar in size, while
> gas-planets are much larger.
> 
> TH


How about Pluto?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279311 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	benj <none@gmail.com>
Date	2015-11-22 08:40 -0500
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<GBj4y.85404$og6.82767@fx06.iad>
In reply to	#279308

On 11/22/2015 03:41 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>
>> Am 22.11.2015 08:11, schrieb The Starmaker:
>>
>>>>>>        1.
>>>>>>        spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Earth-size planet
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
>>>>
>>>> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we
>>>> see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM
>>>> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life
>>>> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea
>>>> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and
>>>> ignorant?
>>>
>>> Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
>>> system are Earth-size planets?
>>
>> Depends on what you regard as 'Earth-size'.
>>
>> At least the Earth has this size.
>>
>> But roughly Mars and Venus are 'Earth-sized'.
>>
>> But - in a way - all the 'stony' planets are similar in size, while
>> gas-planets are much larger.
>>
>> TH
>
>
> How about Pluto?
>
Not a planet. Next question.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279321 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-11-22 13:00 -0800
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<56522CE8.AFC@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#279311

benj wrote:
> 
> On 11/22/2015 03:41 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 22.11.2015 08:11, schrieb The Starmaker:
> >>
> >>>>>>        1.
> >>>>>>        spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1) Earth-size planet
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
> >>>>
> >>>> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we
> >>>> see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM
> >>>> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life
> >>>> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea
> >>>> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and
> >>>> ignorant?
> >>>
> >>> Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
> >>> system are Earth-size planets?
> >>
> >> Depends on what you regard as 'Earth-size'.
> >>
> >> At least the Earth has this size.
> >>
> >> But roughly Mars and Venus are 'Earth-sized'.
> >>
> >> But - in a way - all the 'stony' planets are similar in size, while
> >> gas-planets are much larger.
> >>
> >> TH
> >
> >
> > How about Pluto?
> >
> Not a planet. Next question.

If it is not a planet then explain what it is without using the word
'planet'.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279472 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date	2015-11-26 07:10 +0100
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<dbnm23Ftci5U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#279321

Am 22.11.2015 22:00, schrieb The Starmaker:
  ..
>>>>> Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
>>>>> system are Earth-size planets?
>>>>
>>>> Depends on what you regard as 'Earth-size'.
>>>>
>>>> At least the Earth has this size.
>>>>
>>>> But roughly Mars and Venus are 'Earth-sized'.
>>>>
>>>> But - in a way - all the 'stony' planets are similar in size, while
>>>> gas-planets are much larger.
>>>>
>>>> TH
>>>
>>>
>>> How about Pluto?
>>>
>> Not a planet. Next question.
>
> If it is not a planet then explain what it is without using the word
> 'planet'.

Every word has a common usage. In physics the content of a scientific 
term is codified in what's called a definition.

This definition we had to agree upon, if we want to successfully 
communicate about a certain subject.

If you use a phrase, but disagree to it's definition, you disturb the 
fabric of science, even if the 'wrong' use of the term is actually allowed.

But it's unscientific to use words in other ways as they are intended.

Here we have the question, if Pluto belongs to the planets of our solar 
system.

Whether or not this is the case, that is a question of the definition of 
the term 'planet'. And the definition is based on an agreement among 
scientists.

You may - nevertheless - reject such definitions and use any world you 
like to address any possible object. This is legal, but not recommended, 
since nobody will understand, what you try to say.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279476 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com>
Date	2015-11-26 09:01 -0600
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<n376sj$3qr$2@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to	#279321

>>> How about Pluto?
>>>
>> Not a planet. Next question.
>
> If it is not a planet then explain what it is without using the word
> 'planet'.
>

formally known as planet

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279324 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll>
Date	2015-11-22 22:32 +0100
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<56523500$0$24145$e4fe514c@textnews.kpn.nl>
In reply to	#279306

On 22.11.15 8:11, The Starmaker wrote:
> benj wrote:
>>
>> On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
>>>>
>>>> non·sense
>>>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
>>>> noun
>>>> noun: nonsense
>>>>
>>>>       1.
>>>>       spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
>>>>
>>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
>>>>
>>>> 1) Earth-size planet
>>>>
>>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
>>>
>>>
>>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
>>
>> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we
>> see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM
>> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life
>> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea
>> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and
>> ignorant?
>
> Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
> system are Earth-size planets?
>
2. venus and earth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279328 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-11-22 14:17 -0800
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<56523F0E.16A6@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#279324

Sjouke Burry wrote:
> 
> On 22.11.15 8:11, The Starmaker wrote:
> > benj wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
> >>>>
> >>>> non·sense
> >>>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
> >>>> noun
> >>>> noun: nonsense
> >>>>
> >>>>       1.
> >>>>       spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
> >>>>
> >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) Earth-size planet
> >>>>
> >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
> >>
> >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we
> >> see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM
> >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life
> >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea
> >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and
> >> ignorant?
> >
> > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
> > system are Earth-size planets?
> >
> 2. venus and earth.


I mean, I just don't understand where some people come from...

In skool, they teach you the earth radius is 3,959 mi.

You know what you shoe size is, ...


Why is it all of a sudden everyone doesn't know what the size of the earth is??? 


The Earth-size is 3,959 mi.


Venus-size is 3,760 mi


It's a smaller size shoe.

Somebody mentioned Mars is Earth-size,  2,106 mi


The Earth-size is 3,959 mi.


If you ask kids in school today "What is the size of the earth?" Has the answered changed????


I don't get it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279337

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2015-11-22 21:37 -0800
Message-ID	<5652A612.4CB5@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#279328

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sjouke Burry wrote:
> >
> > On 22.11.15 8:11, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > benj wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> non·sense
> > >>>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
> > >>>> noun
> > >>>> noun: nonsense
> > >>>>
> > >>>>       1.
> > >>>>       spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 1) Earth-size planet
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
> > >>
> > >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we
> > >> see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM
> > >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life
> > >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea
> > >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and
> > >> ignorant?
> > >
> > > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
> > > system are Earth-size planets?
> > >
> > 2. venus and earth.
> 
> I mean, I just don't understand where some people come from...
> 
> In skool, they teach you the earth radius is 3,959 mi.
> 
> You know what you shoe size is, ...
> 
> Why is it all of a sudden everyone doesn't know what the size of the earth is???
> 
> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi.
> 
> Venus-size is 3,760 mi
> 
> It's a smaller size shoe.
> 
> Somebody mentioned Mars is Earth-size,  2,106 mi
> 
> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi.
> 
> If you ask kids in school today "What is the size of the earth?" Has the answered changed????
> 
> I don't get it.




Okay, I'll make it simple...only a smart person can answer this question correctly..

The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius.

if I mutiply that number by 2,

2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi radius


The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279390

From	Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net>
Date	2015-11-24 12:17 -0700
Message-ID	<gld95btoqv6pqqso2vqis4sj5in5i3i0c5@4ax.com>
In reply to	#279337

YOU AIN'T SMART, FAKER!

EARTH'S DIAMETER IS 7918 MILES, NOT THE RADIUS, SHITFORBRAINS!

YOU SURE FUCKED THAT ONE UP, LIKE THE FAKER YOU ARE!

Saul Levy


On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:37:22 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> Sjouke Burry wrote:
>> >
>> > On 22.11.15 8:11, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > benj wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> non·sense
>> > >>>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
>> > >>>> noun
>> > >>>> noun: nonsense
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>       1.
>> > >>>>       spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no sense.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific community'...
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> 1) Earth-size planet
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
>> > >>
>> > >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that we
>> > >> see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as QM
>> > >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien life
>> > >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the idea
>> > >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious and
>> > >> ignorant?
>> > >
>> > > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
>> > > system are Earth-size planets?
>> > >
>> > 2. venus and earth.
>> 
>> I mean, I just don't understand where some people come from...
>> 
>> In skool, they teach you the earth radius is 3,959 mi.
>> 
>> You know what you shoe size is, ...
>> 
>> Why is it all of a sudden everyone doesn't know what the size of the earth is???
>> 
>> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi.
>> 
>> Venus-size is 3,760 mi
>> 
>> It's a smaller size shoe.
>> 
>> Somebody mentioned Mars is Earth-size,  2,106 mi
>> 
>> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi.
>> 
>> If you ask kids in school today "What is the size of the earth?" Has the answered changed????
>> 
>> I don't get it.
>
>
>Okay, I'll make it simple...only a smart person can answer this question correctly..
>
>The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius.
>
>if I mutiply that number by 2,
>
>2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi radius
>
>
>The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279391 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	"Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net>
Date	2015-11-24 13:41 -0600
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<n32egt$oeq$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to	#279390

I BET YOUR BALLS GET THAT BIG WHEN YOU SIT ON YOUR 1,000 YEAR OLD NUTSACK.

Notroll2015

"Saul Levy"  wrote in message 
news:gld95btoqv6pqqso2vqis4sj5in5i3i0c5@4ax.com...

YOU AIN'T SMART, FAKER!

EARTH'S DIAMETER IS 7918 MILES, NOT THE RADIUS, SHITFORBRAINS!

YOU SURE FUCKED THAT ONE UP, LIKE THE FAKER YOU ARE!

Saul Levy


On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:37:22 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Sjouke Burry wrote:
>> >
>> > On 22.11.15 8:11, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > benj wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> On 11/21/2015 08:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> non·sense
>> > >>>> 'nän?sens,'näns?ns/
>> > >>>> noun
>> > >>>> noun: nonsense
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>       1.
>> > >>>>       spoken or written words that have no meaning or make no 
>> > >>>> sense.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> How about some examples of "Nonsense" from yous in the 'scientific 
>> > >>>> community'...
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> 1) Earth-size planet
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> So that means if they find a planet that it's radius is 7,918 
>> > >>>> miles then it's Earth-size, correct or Nonsense?
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Maybe this question was too complicated...I'll rephrase it,
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> How many Earth-size planets are in our solar system?
>> > >>
>> > >> How many suns in OUR Galaxy? How many galaxies in the universe (that 
>> > >> we
>> > >> see)?  People blindly accept probability waves in nothing at all as 
>> > >> QM
>> > >> truth, yet when one points out the OVERWHELMING probably that alien 
>> > >> life
>> > >> forms exist elsewhere in the universe, science laughs and calls the 
>> > >> idea
>> > >> "kook". Let me ask YOU. Who is the Kook? Who is being superstitious 
>> > >> and
>> > >> ignorant?
>> > >
>> > > Okay, I'll rephrase the question: How many known planets in our solar
>> > > system are Earth-size planets?
>> > >
>> > 2. venus and earth.
>>
>> I mean, I just don't understand where some people come from...
>>
>> In skool, they teach you the earth radius is 3,959 mi.
>>
>> You know what you shoe size is, ...
>>
>> Why is it all of a sudden everyone doesn't know what the size of the 
>> earth is???
>>
>> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi.
>>
>> Venus-size is 3,760 mi
>>
>> It's a smaller size shoe.
>>
>> Somebody mentioned Mars is Earth-size,  2,106 mi
>>
>> The Earth-size is 3,959 mi.
>>
>> If you ask kids in school today "What is the size of the earth?" Has the 
>> answered changed????
>>
>> I don't get it.
>
>
>Okay, I'll make it simple...only a smart person can answer this question 
>correctly..
>
>The Earth-size is 3,959 mi radius.
>
>if I mutiply that number by 2,
>
>2 x 3,959 mi radius = 7,918 mi radius
>
>
>The question now is: Is 7,918 mi radius Earth-size? Yes or No??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279394

From	Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net>
Date	2015-11-24 13:30 -0700
Message-ID	<i4i95b94dab76h5t0quvenqkelvjc040sv@4ax.com>
In reply to	#279391

THE ONLY OLD NUTSACK IS YOU, TROLLSHITHEAD!

FUCK OFF!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:41:21 -0600, "Notroll2015"
<notroll2015@charter.net> wrote:

>I BET YOUR BALLS GET THAT BIG WHEN YOU SIT ON YOUR 1,000 YEAR OLD NUTSACK.
>
>Notroll2015

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279400 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

From	"Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net>
Date	2015-11-24 15:41 -0600
Subject	Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’
Message-ID	<n32lhc$bgv$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to	#279394

WHEN YOU SIT DOWN ON THE SHITTER TO TAKE A DUMP, IS IT A SHOCK WHEN YOUR 
NUTS HIT THE COLD WATER IN THE BOWL?

Notroll2015.

"Saul Levy"  wrote in message 
news:i4i95b94dab76h5t0quvenqkelvjc040sv@4ax.com...

THE ONLY OLD NUTSACK IS YOU, TROLLSHITHEAD!

FUCK OFF!

Saul Levy

On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:41:21 -0600, "Notroll2015"
<notroll2015@charter.net> wrote:

>I BET YOUR BALLS GET THAT BIG WHEN YOU SIT ON YOUR 1,000 YEAR OLD NUTSACK.
>
>Notroll2015

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#279406

From	Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net>
Date	2015-11-24 15:32 -0700
Message-ID	<3ap95blelanf9ac6rd622veinq4ngssg98@4ax.com>
In reply to	#279400

THAT NEVER HAPPENS, FUCKING TROLL!

THERE IS SOMETHING SICK ABOUT YOU, IMBECILE!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:41:04 -0600, "Notroll2015"
<notroll2015@charter.net> wrote:

>WHEN YOU SIT DOWN ON THE SHITTER TO TAKE A DUMP, IS IT A SHOCK WHEN YOUR 
>NUTS HIT THE COLD WATER IN THE BOWL?
>
>Notroll2015.
>
>"Saul Levy"  wrote in message 
>news:i4i95b94dab76h5t0quvenqkelvjc040sv@4ax.com...
>
>THE ONLY OLD NUTSACK IS YOU, TROLLSHITHEAD!
>
>FUCK OFF!
>
>Saul Levy
>
>
>On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:41:21 -0600, "Notroll2015"
><notroll2015@charter.net> wrote:
>
>>I BET YOUR BALLS GET THAT BIG WHEN YOU SIT ON YOUR 1,000 YEAR OLD NUTSACK.
>>
>>Notroll2015

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →

csiph-web

Based On Nonsense

Contents

#279248 — Based On Nonsense

#279249

#279300

#279304 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279305 — Re: 'Based On Nonsense'

#279306 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279307 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279308 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279311 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279321 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279472 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279476 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279324 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279328 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279337

#279390

#279391 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279394

#279400 — Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’

#279406

Based On Nonsense

#279248 — Based On Nonsense