Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #278953 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-10 23:55 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-11-12 22:51 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 60 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-10 23:55 -0800
Re: INFINITY HGW <xxx@....> - 2015-11-11 19:57 +1100
Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 08:46 -0600
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 11:55 -0800
Re: INFINITY David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-11-11 14:19 -0600
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 13:12 -0800
Re: INFINITY Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-11 16:29 -0700
Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 08:43 -0600
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 13:16 -0800
Re: INFINITY Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-11 16:28 -0700
Re: INFINITY gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-11 21:21 -0600
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 19:40 -0800
Re: INFINITY je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-11-12 02:02 -0800
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-12 09:39 -0800
Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 11:47 -0600
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-12 23:25 -0800
Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 09:09 -0600
Re: INFINITY kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-13 15:52 -0500
Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 15:07 -0600
Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 15:11 -0600
Re: INFINITY kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-13 16:39 -0500
Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 16:11 -0600
Re: INFINITY Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-13 23:44 +0100
Re: INFINITY kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-13 19:39 -0500
Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 18:50 -0600
Re: INFINITY kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 04:39 -0500
Re: INFINITY Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 11:19 -0800
Re: INFINITY Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-14 13:21 -0700
Re: INFINITY Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-13 14:48 -0800
Re: INFINITY Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-13 16:59 -0800
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-13 15:59 -0800
Re: INFINITY Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-13 18:08 -0700
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-14 11:46 -0800
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-14 12:04 -0800
Re: INFINITY Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-14 13:15 -0700
Re: INFINITY palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 11:34 -0800
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-15 14:27 -0800
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-15 15:07 -0800
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-15 16:23 -0800
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-15 21:56 -0800
Re: INFINITY Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-16 08:31 -0700
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-16 11:16 -0800
Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 13:29 -0600
Re: INFINITY dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-16 15:50 -0500
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-16 13:48 -0800
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-16 14:45 -0800
Re: INFINITY Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-17 14:48 -0700
Re: INFINITY Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-17 14:47 -0700
Re: INFINITY Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-14 13:17 -0700
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-15 14:57 -0800
Re: INFINITY Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-16 11:39 -0700
Re: INFINITY benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 14:06 -0500
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-12 11:42 -0800
Re: INFINITY benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 13:15 -0500
Re: INFINITY Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-12 10:26 -0800
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 19:37 -0800
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 18:25 -0800
Re: INFINITY David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-11-12 13:04 -0600
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-12 11:54 -0800
Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-12 22:51 -0800
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 08:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <eltj4b5noj9crp0e5dg0bc7hg3msnmjbin@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279114 |
THERE ARE NO GREEN STARS, IMBECILE! Saul Levy On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 21:56:16 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: >> >> On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 4:23:28 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: >> > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: >> > > >> > > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 3:07:39 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: >> > > >> > > > My mistake, I copied an incomplete link: >> > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_star_%28astronomy%29 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > But, I was refering to 'green stars' that existed BEFORE the big bang: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Don't you see the color green? Don't you see Green Stars? >> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg >> > > >> > > I'm going to suggest that perhaps you are colorblind. >> > > >> > > I'm also going to suggest that before the big bang there was nothing... but any answer to that question is doomed to be just speculation, in any case... >> > >> > What question are you refering to? >> >> Why, the question of "what existed before the big bang". Having a little trouble with comprehension, are we? >> >> > Just imagine for a moment... >> > (try thinking on your own) >> > >> > You take a camera.. >> > and stand right where >> > the big bang took place.. >> > take a picture >> > just before the big bang... >> > what will you see? >> >> Nothing at all. Why, what do YOU think you would see? > > >“My god, it’s full of green stars”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 11:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <564A2BA5.5653@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279114 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 4:23:28 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 3:07:39 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > My mistake, I copied an incomplete link: > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_star_%28astronomy%29 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, I was refering to 'green stars' that existed BEFORE the big bang: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't you see the color green? Don't you see Green Stars? > > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > I'm going to suggest that perhaps you are colorblind. > > > > > > > > I'm also going to suggest that before the big bang there was nothing... but any answer to that question is doomed to be just speculation, in any case... > > > > > > What question are you refering to? > > > > Why, the question of "what existed before the big bang". Having a little trouble with comprehension, are we? > > > > > Just imagine for a moment... > > > (try thinking on your own) > > > > > > You take a camera.. > > > and stand right where > > > the big bang took place.. > > > take a picture > > > just before the big bang... > > > what will you see? > > > > Nothing at all. Why, what do YOU think you would see? > > “My god, it’s full of green stars” I'll explain again what caused the big bang...since I see most of yous intelligence is 'bounded' by the internet. The big bang was not an explosion of space as others will have you believe. The big bang was an explosion of MORE space. The green stars that existed before the big bang got to a point in time where new born green stars lacked room in the bounds of it's universe. It got so crowded of green stars it took just one more green star to be born to set off the explosion....the explosion of 'more' space..an expansion. In the process, the stars got so hot, it turned white...blue hot. And all, new law of physics were added to accomadate the new space and expansion. You don't have to be a rocet scientist to know this stuff...you just have to go beyond the bounds of the internet....pass the few books in the book store... you have to learn to...think for yourself. The Starmaker I have to come up with a new publication: TRUE ASTRONOMY: What Really Caused The Big Bang!...a Starmaker Publication. Did you read my other science publications? http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 13:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <kIOdnd9UDbfjs9fLnZ2dnUU7-VEAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #279136 |
On 11/16/15 1:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The big bang was not an explosion of space as others will have you
> believe. The big bang was an explosion of MORE space.
No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 15:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dautscFkup6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #279136 |
On 11/16/2015 2:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 4:23:28 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> pnal...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 3:07:39 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> My mistake, I copied an incomplete link: >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_star_%28astronomy%29 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But, I was refering to 'green stars' that existed BEFORE the big bang: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Don't you see the color green? Don't you see Green Stars? >>>>>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg >>>>> >>>>> I'm going to suggest that perhaps you are colorblind. >>>>> >>>>> I'm also going to suggest that before the big bang there was nothing... but any answer to that question is doomed to be just speculation, in any case... >>>> >>>> What question are you refering to? >>> >>> Why, the question of "what existed before the big bang". Having a little trouble with comprehension, are we? >>> >>>> Just imagine for a moment... >>>> (try thinking on your own) >>>> >>>> You take a camera.. >>>> and stand right where >>>> the big bang took place.. >>>> take a picture >>>> just before the big bang... >>>> what will you see? >>> >>> Nothing at all. Why, what do YOU think you would see? >> >> “My god, it’s full of green stars” > > > I'll explain again what caused the big bang...since I see > most of yous intelligence is 'bounded' by the internet. > > The big bang was not an explosion of space as others will have you > believe. The big bang was an explosion of MORE space. > > The green stars that existed before the big bang got to a point in time > where new born green stars lacked room in the bounds of it's universe. > > It got so crowded of green stars it took just one more green star to > be born to set off the explosion....the explosion of 'more' space..an expansion. > > In the process, the stars got so hot, it turned white...blue hot. > > And all, new law of physics were added to accomadate the new space and expansion. > > You don't have to be a rocet scientist to know this stuff...you just have to > go beyond the bounds of the internet....pass the few books in the book store... > you have to learn to...think for yourself. > > The Starmaker > > > I have to come up with a new publication: TRUE ASTRONOMY: What Really Caused The Big Bang!...a Starmaker Publication. > > > Did you read my other science publications? > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg Odd, the link on the cover is dead... -- dvus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 13:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <564A4F17.1B4D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279146 |
dvus wrote: > > On 11/16/2015 2:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 4:23:28 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 3:07:39 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> My mistake, I copied an incomplete link: > >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_star_%28astronomy%29 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> But, I was refering to 'green stars' that existed BEFORE the big bang: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Don't you see the color green? Don't you see Green Stars? > >>>>>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm going to suggest that perhaps you are colorblind. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm also going to suggest that before the big bang there was nothing... but any answer to that question is doomed to be just speculation, in any case... > >>>> > >>>> What question are you refering to? > >>> > >>> Why, the question of "what existed before the big bang". Having a little trouble with comprehension, are we? > >>> > >>>> Just imagine for a moment... > >>>> (try thinking on your own) > >>>> > >>>> You take a camera.. > >>>> and stand right where > >>>> the big bang took place.. > >>>> take a picture > >>>> just before the big bang... > >>>> what will you see? > >>> > >>> Nothing at all. Why, what do YOU think you would see? > >> > >> “My god, it’s full of green stars†> > > > > > I'll explain again what caused the big bang...since I see > > most of yous intelligence is 'bounded' by the internet. > > > > The big bang was not an explosion of space as others will have you > > believe. The big bang was an explosion of MORE space. > > > > The green stars that existed before the big bang got to a point in time > > where new born green stars lacked room in the bounds of it's universe. > > > > It got so crowded of green stars it took just one more green star to > > be born to set off the explosion....the explosion of 'more' space..an expansion. > > > > In the process, the stars got so hot, it turned white...blue hot. > > > > And all, new law of physics were added to accomadate the new space and expansion. > > > > You don't have to be a rocet scientist to know this stuff...you just have to > > go beyond the bounds of the internet....pass the few books in the book store... > > you have to learn to...think for yourself. > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > I have to come up with a new publication: TRUE ASTRONOMY: What Really Caused The Big Bang!...a Starmaker Publication. > > > > > > Did you read my other science publications? > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg > > Odd, the link on the cover is dead... The link on the cover is not a real link. > > -- > dvus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 14:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <564A5C7C.4887@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279153 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > dvus wrote: > > > > On 11/16/2015 2:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > >> > > >> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > >>> > > >>> On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 4:23:28 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>> pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 3:07:39 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> My mistake, I copied an incomplete link: > > >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_star_%28astronomy%29 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> But, I was refering to 'green stars' that existed BEFORE the big bang: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Don't you see the color green? Don't you see Green Stars? > > >>>>>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I'm going to suggest that perhaps you are colorblind. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I'm also going to suggest that before the big bang there was nothing... but any answer to that question is doomed to be just speculation, in any case... > > >>>> > > >>>> What question are you refering to? > > >>> > > >>> Why, the question of "what existed before the big bang". Having a little trouble with comprehension, are we? > > >>> > > >>>> Just imagine for a moment... > > >>>> (try thinking on your own) > > >>>> > > >>>> You take a camera.. > > >>>> and stand right where > > >>>> the big bang took place.. > > >>>> take a picture > > >>>> just before the big bang... > > >>>> what will you see? > > >>> > > >>> Nothing at all. Why, what do YOU think you would see? > > >> > > >> “My god, it’s full of green stars†> > > > > > > > > I'll explain again what caused the big bang...since I see > > > most of yous intelligence is 'bounded' by the internet. > > > > > > The big bang was not an explosion of space as others will have you > > > believe. The big bang was an explosion of MORE space. > > > > > > The green stars that existed before the big bang got to a point in time > > > where new born green stars lacked room in the bounds of it's universe. > > > > > > It got so crowded of green stars it took just one more green star to > > > be born to set off the explosion....the explosion of 'more' space..an expansion. > > > > > > In the process, the stars got so hot, it turned white...blue hot. > > > > > > And all, new law of physics were added to accomadate the new space and expansion. > > > > > > You don't have to be a rocet scientist to know this stuff...you just have to > > > go beyond the bounds of the internet....pass the few books in the book store... > > > you have to learn to...think for yourself. > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > > > > I have to come up with a new publication: TRUE ASTRONOMY: What Really Caused The Big Bang!...a Starmaker Publication. > > > > > > > > > Did you read my other science publications? > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg > > > > Odd, the link on the cover is dead... > > The link on the cover is not a real link. > > > > > -- > > dvus It's called a mock-up magazine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-17 14:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <248n4blivmku7h9eghln3mg66ie3lf24nu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279157 |
IT'S JUST WHAT I SAID: A FAKE! Saul Levy On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:45:16 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >It's called a mock-up magazine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-17 14:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <rv7n4btms3f0th5odb3ihlflt1ov3kvaos@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279136 |
ANOTHER FAKE "PUBLICATION"? JUST LIKE ARCieSHITHEAD'S BOOK OF DEATH! BIG FUCKING DEAL THAT IS! Saul Levy On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:16:53 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >The Starmaker wrote: >I have to come up with a new publication: TRUE ASTRONOMY: What Really Caused The Big Bang!...a Starmaker Publication. > > >Did you read my other science publications? >http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The%20Starmaker%20Science%20Journal/The-Starmaker-Science-Journal-2-abcd.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 13:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ak5f4b1effsk1pddhhojch2g5k7b6kbahq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279066 |
MAKE THAT A LYING FRAUD! YOU ARE A NOTHING! Saul Levy On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 11:46:48 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >I give the >'scientific community' >another thousand years >to catch up to me. > >The Starmaker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-15 14:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56490DBF.479D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #279069 |
Saul Levy wrote: > > MAKE THAT A LYING FRAUD! > > YOU ARE A NOTHING! Saul, don't you mean a NOBODY? I mean, isn't that how yous people talk about others, you call everyone ouside your 'community' ...a NOBODY??? In other words, yous people say in the 'scientific community' (behind peoples back) "Oh, don't worry about him, he's a NOBODY!" A NOTHING is something that doesn't exist. Are you talking to NOTHING or NOBODY? Oh, I wanted to ask you a question Saul Levy...are your relatives American Indians?? http://www.kingofcopy.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/You-dont-have-to-be-Jewish-to-Love-Levys.jpg I mean, you look like and dress like an American Indian... http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BBgQ3t7CAAIkVc_.jpg:large I'm just confused because the poster slogan contradicts the person in the photo: http://www.kingofcopy.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/You-dont-have-to-be-Jewish-to-Love-Levys.jpg http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-trB1YatmTFA/TcrY-Q8XHyI/AAAAAAAAAIU/5WRZ56SvXU4/s1600/DSC_0147.jpg Or, let me take it a level further that confuses me... Here is the language of the American Indian and the Hebrew language: English Jehovah God Jah Shiloh Heavens Father Man Woman Wife Thou His Wife This man Nose Roof of a house Winter Canaan To pray Now Hind part Do To blow Rushing wind Ararat, or high mount Indian Yohewah Ale Yah Shilu Chemim Abba Ish, Ishte Ishto Awah Keah Liani Uwoh Niehiri Traubana-ora Kora Cannai Phale Na Kesh Jennais Phaubac Rowah Ararat Hebrew Jehovah Ale, Aleim Jah Shiloh Shemim Abba Ish Ishto Eweh, Eve Ka Lihene Huah Neheri Debonaour Korah Canaan Phalac Na Kish Jannon Phaubac Ruach Ararat So you can understand my confusion with this poster and it's slogan: http://www.kingofcopy.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/You-dont-have-to-be-Jewish-to-Love-Levys.jpg It reads: You-dont-have-to-be-Jewish-to-Love-Levys...but the guy in the picture is Jewish! I'm confused....somebody help me out here. > > Saul Levy > > On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 11:46:48 -0800, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >I give the > >'scientific community' > >another thousand years > >to catch up to me. > > > >The Starmaker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 11:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pj8k4bt430kp9rkad9ehgoc6sgapkgffcq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #279100 |
YOU ARE A PIECE OF SHIT, FAKER! FUCK OFF! Saul Levy On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 14:57:03 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Saul Levy wrote: >> >> MAKE THAT A LYING FRAUD! >> >> YOU ARE A NOTHING! > >Saul, don't you mean a NOBODY? > >I mean, isn't that how yous people talk about others, you call everyone >ouside your 'community' ...a NOBODY??? > >In other words, yous people say in the 'scientific community' (behind peoples back) >"Oh, don't worry about him, he's a NOBODY!" > > >A NOTHING is something that doesn't exist. Are you talking to NOTHING or NOBODY? > > >Oh, I wanted to ask you a question Saul Levy...are your relatives American Indians?? > >http://www.kingofcopy.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/You-dont-have-to-be-Jewish-to-Love-Levys.jpg > >I mean, you look like and dress like an American Indian... >http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BBgQ3t7CAAIkVc_.jpg:large > > > >I'm just confused because the poster slogan contradicts the person in the photo: >http://www.kingofcopy.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/You-dont-have-to-be-Jewish-to-Love-Levys.jpg > >http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-trB1YatmTFA/TcrY-Q8XHyI/AAAAAAAAAIU/5WRZ56SvXU4/s1600/DSC_0147.jpg > > >Or, let me take it a level further that confuses me... > >Here is the language of the American Indian and the Hebrew language: > > > English > > >Jehovah >God >Jah >Shiloh >Heavens >Father >Man >Woman >Wife >Thou >His Wife >This man >Nose >Roof of a house >Winter >Canaan >To pray >Now >Hind part >Do >To blow >Rushing wind >Ararat, or high mount > > > Indian > > >Yohewah >Ale >Yah >Shilu >Chemim >Abba >Ish, Ishte >Ishto >Awah >Keah >Liani >Uwoh >Niehiri >Traubana-ora >Kora >Cannai >Phale >Na >Kesh >Jennais >Phaubac >Rowah >Ararat > > > Hebrew > > >Jehovah >Ale, Aleim >Jah >Shiloh >Shemim >Abba >Ish >Ishto >Eweh, Eve >Ka >Lihene >Huah >Neheri >Debonaour >Korah >Canaan >Phalac >Na >Kish >Jannon >Phaubac >Ruach >Ararat > > > > > >So you can understand my confusion with this poster and it's slogan: > >http://www.kingofcopy.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/You-dont-have-to-be-Jewish-to-Love-Levys.jpg > > >It reads: You-dont-have-to-be-Jewish-to-Love-Levys...but the guy in the picture is Jewish! [AND YOU ARE AN IDIOT!] > >I'm confused....somebody help me out here. [YES, WE SEE THAT!] > > > > > >> >> Saul Levy >> >> On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 11:46:48 -0800, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> >I give the >> >'scientific community' >> >another thousand years >> >to catch up to me. >> > >> >The Starmaker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 14:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sq51y.59369$WF.31637@fx30.iad> |
| In reply to | #278988 |
On 11/12/2015 12:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 2:02:42 AM UTC-8, je suis charly wrote:
>>> In article <n210k5$l1d$1@speranza.aioe.org>, gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The universe is flat, not curved...it is only curved...mathematically.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> you silly, if the universe is flat, why is the earth a sphere ?
>>>>
>>>> and yes, Earth is only curved at the edges.
>>>
>>> The universe appears to have zero global curvature; mathematicians refer to zero
>>> curvature as flat. This an additional definition to the old definition of a
>>> primarily two dimensional surface with little relief in the third dimension. The
>>> earth is nearly spherical body in a local hyperbolic geometry which appears over
>>> long distance to become Euclidean geometry.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments
>>> of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from
>>> coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true
>>> of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
>>
>> On peut commencer avec "il n'y a peut de l'Universe".
>>
>> One can start with "there is only the Universe".
>> One can start with "there is nothing but the Universe".
>>
>> On peut commencer avec "il n'y a plus de l'Universe".
>
>
> You got everything wrong...(you need to get off the math road)
>
>
> "there is nothing AND the universe"
>
>
> Where do you think the universe came from?
The universe was projected from God, starfaker. Hence, God is everything
and always was and will be. Hence God is nothing AND the universe!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 11:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5644EB99.36E2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #278994 |
benj wrote: > > On 11/12/2015 12:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Ross A. Finlayson wrote: > >> > >> On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 2:02:42 AM UTC-8, je suis charly wrote: > >>> In article <n210k5$l1d$1@speranza.aioe.org>, gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> The universe is flat, not curved...it is only curved...mathematically. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> you silly, if the universe is flat, why is the earth a sphere ? > >>>> > >>>> and yes, Earth is only curved at the edges. > >>> > >>> The universe appears to have zero global curvature; mathematicians refer to zero > >>> curvature as flat. This an additional definition to the old definition of a > >>> primarily two dimensional surface with little relief in the third dimension. The > >>> earth is nearly spherical body in a local hyperbolic geometry which appears over > >>> long distance to become Euclidean geometry. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments > >>> of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from > >>> coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true > >>> of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye. > >> > >> On peut commencer avec "il n'y a peut de l'Universe". > >> > >> One can start with "there is only the Universe". > >> One can start with "there is nothing but the Universe". > >> > >> On peut commencer avec "il n'y a plus de l'Universe". > > > > > > You got everything wrong...(you need to get off the math road) > > > > > > "there is nothing AND the universe" > > > > > > Where do you think the universe came from? > > The universe was projected from God, starfaker. Hence, God is everything > and always was and will be. Hence God is nothing AND the universe! > So then...you don't believe God created the universe since it already existed?? How about the earth???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 13:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jH41y.64418$4M.55932@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #278983 |
On 11/12/2015 05:02 AM, je suis charly wrote:
> In article <n210k5$l1d$1@speranza.aioe.org>, gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>>> The universe is flat, not curved...it is only curved...mathematically.
>>
>>
>> you silly, if the universe is flat, why is the earth a sphere ?
>>
>> and yes, Earth is only curved at the edges.
>
> The universe appears to have zero global curvature; mathematicians refer to zero
> curvature as flat. This an additional definition to the old definition of a
> primarily two dimensional surface with little relief in the third dimension. The
> earth is nearly spherical body in a local hyperbolic geometry which appears over
> long distance to become Euclidean geometry.
Exactly correct. Before one assumes the universe to be flat, one FIRST
needs to employ instruments sensitive enough to detect deviations from
180 degrees for the sum of the angles of a triangle on the surface of a
hypersphere of say 500 million light years in diameter.
How one would do that would be an interesting discussion of experimental
physics.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 10:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-2DC00D.10263612112015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #278990 |
In article <jH41y.64418$4M.55932@fx17.iad>, benj <none@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/12/2015 05:02 AM, je suis charly wrote: > > In article <n210k5$l1d$1@speranza.aioe.org>, gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> > > wrote: > > > >>> The universe is flat, not curved...it is only curved...mathematically. > >> > >> > >> you silly, if the universe is flat, why is the earth a sphere ? > >> > >> and yes, Earth is only curved at the edges. > > > > The universe appears to have zero global curvature; mathematicians refer to > > zero > > curvature as flat. This an additional definition to the old definition of a > > primarily two dimensional surface with little relief in the third > > dimension. The > > earth is nearly spherical body in a local hyperbolic geometry which appears > > over > > long distance to become Euclidean geometry. > > Exactly correct. Before one assumes the universe to be flat, one FIRST > needs to employ instruments sensitive enough to detect deviations from > 180 degrees for the sum of the angles of a triangle on the surface of a > hypersphere of say 500 million light years in diameter. The current evidence is the distribution of cosmic background radiation which physicists say is most consistent with little or no curvature. -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' God exists since mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists since we cannot prove the consistency. ~~ Morris Kline
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 19:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5644097C.69AC@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #278966 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > benj wrote: > > > > On 11/11/2015 09:40 AM, Sam Wormley wrote: > > > On 11/11/15 8:20 AM, HVAC wrote: > > >> The universe is finite yet unbounded. Since objects near the end of > > >> our ability to see are moving away from us at speeds approaching > > >> light, this effectively makes the universe, to us, infinite > > >> > > > > > > Well... we could quibble about *why* the universe might be infinite. > > > Many a physicist argue the the overall flatness of the universe is > > > a dead giveaway that it is infinite. But I'd settle for Huge! > > > > Actually Sam, for once you are right...sort of. Universe is HUGE and > > finite, but not flat. It only appears flat to us because our instruments > > are not sensitive enough to measure the tiny curvature. > > > > More misinformation being posted in my threads...i will not stand for it. > > Get this straight for once and for all.. > > The universe is flat, not curved...it is only curved...mathematically. > > I don't allow misinformation being spread in my threads...do it on ohter > threads > where people don't care if children are reading misinformation. > > (sorry kids, a lot of inconsiderate people are out there) correction: More misinformation being posted in my threads...i will not stand for it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 18:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5643F89D.4D8F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #278953 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Okay, you guys seem to get this "infinity" thing all wrong... > > Albert Einstein is quoted as saying "...I'm not sure about the universe." > > Im other words, Einstein is "not sure" that the universe is infinite. > > If he ain't sure, what makes you guys who are dumber than him.. more surer than him??? > > I mean, if you look that way..all the way, > you will see the back of your head. that is finite. > > or > > a/one google page is determined by google's entire network. Even Isaac Newton (the last smartest guy on earth) wasn't sure about...infinity. what makes you guys who are dumber than him.. more surer than them both??? The Starmaker after Isaac Newton died (the last smartest guy on earth), there was no one smartest since.. it's downhill for you guys, ain't it? Born: January 4, 1643 371 years 10 months 12 days ago 18 hours 23 minutes 58 seconds ago, to be precise. was the last smartest guy on earth. It's over for you guys, ain't it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 13:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n22nnr$e13$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #278974 |
On 11/11/2015 8:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> Okay, you guys seem to get this "infinity" thing all wrong... >> >> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying "...I'm not sure about the universe." >> >> Im other words, Einstein is "not sure" that the universe is infinite. >> >> If he ain't sure, what makes you guys who are dumber than him.. more surer than him??? >> >> I mean, if you look that way..all the way, >> you will see the back of your head. that is finite. >> >> or >> >> a/one google page is determined by google's entire network. > > > Even Isaac Newton (the last smartest guy on earth) wasn't sure > about...infinity. > > > what makes you guys who are dumber than him.. more surer than them > both??? > > > > The Starmaker > > > after Isaac Newton died (the last smartest guy on earth), there was no > one smartest since.. > it's downhill for you guys, ain't it? > > > > Born: January 4, 1643 > > 371 years > 10 months > 12 days ago > 18 hours > 23 minutes > 58 seconds > ago, to be precise. > > was the last smartest guy on earth. > > It's over for you guys, ain't it? > chuckle idiotic dribble having prostrate problems?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 11:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5644EE73.3E4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #278993 |
David Staup wrote: > > On 11/11/2015 8:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> Okay, you guys seem to get this "infinity" thing all wrong... > >> > >> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying "...I'm not sure about the universe." > >> > >> Im other words, Einstein is "not sure" that the universe is infinite. > >> > >> If he ain't sure, what makes you guys who are dumber than him.. more surer than him??? > >> > >> I mean, if you look that way..all the way, > >> you will see the back of your head. that is finite. > >> > >> or > >> > >> a/one google page is determined by google's entire network. > > > > > > Even Isaac Newton (the last smartest guy on earth) wasn't sure > > about...infinity. > > > > > > what makes you guys who are dumber than him.. more surer than them > > both??? > > > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > after Isaac Newton died (the last smartest guy on earth), there was no > > one smartest since.. > > it's downhill for you guys, ain't it? > > > > > > > > Born: January 4, 1643 > > > > 371 years > > 10 months > > 12 days ago > > 18 hours > > 23 minutes > > 58 seconds > > ago, to be precise. > > > > was the last smartest guy on earth. > > > > It's over for you guys, ain't it? > > > chuckle > idiotic dribble > > having prostrate problems? 371 years pass by and this is the best you got?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 22:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56458889.68E6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #278996 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > David Staup wrote: > > > > On 11/11/2015 8:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > >> > > >> Okay, you guys seem to get this "infinity" thing all wrong... > > >> > > >> Albert Einstein is quoted as saying "...I'm not sure about the universe." > > >> > > >> Im other words, Einstein is "not sure" that the universe is infinite. > > >> > > >> If he ain't sure, what makes you guys who are dumber than him.. more surer than him??? > > >> > > >> I mean, if you look that way..all the way, > > >> you will see the back of your head. that is finite. > > >> > > >> or > > >> > > >> a/one google page is determined by google's entire network. > > > > > > > > > Even Isaac Newton (the last smartest guy on earth) wasn't sure > > > about...infinity. > > > > > > > > > what makes you guys who are dumber than him.. more surer than them > > > both??? > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker > > > > > > > > > after Isaac Newton died (the last smartest guy on earth), there was no > > > one smartest since.. > > > it's downhill for you guys, ain't it? > > > > > > > > > > > > Born: January 4, 1643 > > > > > > 371 years > > > 10 months > > > 12 days ago > > > 18 hours > > > 23 minutes > > > 58 seconds > > > ago, to be precise. > > > > > > was the last smartest guy on earth. > > > > > > It's over for you guys, ain't it? > > > > > chuckle > > idiotic dribble > > > > having prostrate problems? > > 371 years pass by and this is the best you got? i mean, can anybody give me the name of one person who is smarter than Isaac Newton? No such person exist..right?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web