Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #270105 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-06-21 13:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-07-10 22:37 -0500 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 43 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-21 13:11 -0700
Re: Near True Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-21 15:04 -0700
Re: Near True David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-06-21 19:19 -0500
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-05 19:01 -0700
Re: Near True Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 14:37 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-07 20:22 -0700
Re: Near True Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 12:47 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 14:26 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-09 10:52 -0700
Re: Near True Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 15:03 -0700
Re: Near True palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 19:10 -0700
Re: Near True Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 06:36 -0700
Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-10 22:41 -0500
Re: Near True Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-13 13:36 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 23:10 -0700
Re: Near True benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 03:00 -0400
Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-14 11:34 -0500
Re: Near True Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-14 10:04 -0700
Re: Near True "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-07-14 12:17 -0500
Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-08 00:21 -0500
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-10 19:41 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-10 19:43 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-12 21:45 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 12:11 -0700
Re: Near True moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-07-13 20:00 +0000
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 15:53 -0700
Re: Near True moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-07-14 02:51 +0000
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 22:48 -0700
Re: Near True moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-07-14 15:28 +0000
Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-14 10:47 -0500
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-14 10:34 -0700
Re: Near True HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 07:14 -0400
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 13:55 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 20:52 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-29 11:48 -0700
Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 23:54 -0700
Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 00:57 -0700
Re: Near True2 Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 04:36 -0700
Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 12:37 -0700
Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 14:04 -0700
Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 17:35 -0700
Re: Near True2 Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 04:39 -0700
Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-10 22:37 -0500
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 17:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Near True2 |
| Message-ID | <55BEB756.6420@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #271550 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > okay > > > > I'll look at it and give you my findings... > > > > > > > > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA19637 > > > > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg > > > > http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/07/31/stunning-photo-saturn-moon-reveals-red-hued-mystery/?intcmp=hphz10 > > > > > > > > but h.g.wells will tell you it's martian canals... > > > > > > didn't take too long to figure out what it is... > > > > > > That's it! > > > > > > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg > > > > > > it's damaged. > > > > > > those ain't red streaks...it's magneta damaged color... > > > > > > forget about the red streaks.. > > > look at the > > > craters at the left with light blueish rings > > > and all that yellow and green stuff.... > > > > > > it looks like > > > one of those > > > red, green, blue > > > cellophane people > > > use to put > > > on their black and white tv sets > > > to see Bonanza in color. > > > > > > is this all they got for us???? > > > > > > damaged goods? > > > > > > the worse photograph by NASA ever taken! > > > > > > not even near true color....more like near broken color. > > > > I figured out who is doing NASA's color processing....Stevie Wonder! > > And the problem is of course with NASA's management... > they should never let that photo reach the media.. > they obviously don't have 'quality control' setup. > > I have this program... > what this program does is > enhances all the colors > except one color...Red. > > It's used > for people who take a color photo > and want to enhance all the color > in the photo except the Red color. > > So... > I run it through... > and guess what happen? > > The opposite happen! > The Red got enhanced and all the > other colors remain the same!!?! > > Now, how is that possible? > > I always use this program > when I want to enhance all > the colors except Red.. > always.. > > and all of a sudden > all the RED gets enhanced! > > All the other colors remain > un enhanced!? > > How is this possible? > > The only answer is.. > those are not Red streaks! > > They are Blue. > > Shadow blue. > > The red streaks are shadows > which in color photos show up as dark blue. > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=871&q=night+photos+of+mountains&oq=night+photos+of+mountains&gs_l=img.3...2987.12344.0.12696.25.25.0.0.0.0.152.2044.23j2.25.0..2..0...1.1.64.img..7.18.1542.i8ZXvFPWbVE > > Just do a Google Image search of "night photos of mountains" and you'll see what color are shadows. > > Obvisouly, quality control is on....vacation. > > And Stevie Wonder is working there part-time. > > Don't send any rockets up in July. > > The Starmaker "The red arcs must be geologically young because they cut across older features like impact craters, but we don't know their age in years," Paul Helfenstein from Cornell University, a Cassini imaging scientist who assisted in the planning of this mission, said. Helfenstein??? Cornell University??? A lot of dummies the universities are producing, ain't they?? imaging scientist???? I've seen their ...images. Garbage!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 04:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Near True2 |
| Message-ID | <390sradboupudk9t78eo1hsrp0qdlaqlh9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #271515 |
WRONG AGAIN, YOU FUCKING KOOK! H.G. IS LONG DEAD AND WILL TELL YOU NOTHING! Saul Levy On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 23:54:37 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >okay >I'll look at it and give you my findings... > >http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA19637 >http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/images/largesize/PIA19637_hires.jpg >http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/07/31/stunning-photo-saturn-moon-reveals-red-hued-mystery/?intcmp=hphz10 > > >but h.g.wells will tell you it's martian canals...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-10 22:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mnq343$gtu$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #270105 |
On 6/21/2015 3:11 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > What does "Near True" mean? > follow the logic; Near True => There True Near True => Not There True Near True => There False Near True => Their False
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web