Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #277013 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-29 09:53 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-29 17:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 325 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy
The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-29 09:53 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 11:27 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 11:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:24 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 13:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 18:23 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-29 17:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 23:05 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:18 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 19:17 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 05:02 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 08:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:05 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 15:21 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:55 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-30 13:25 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 14:20 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 16:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 17:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-02 09:58 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 12:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 16:03 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 05:42 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 03:47 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 06:27 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-03 05:33 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 22:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 08:58 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 16:30 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 19:49 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 04:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 12:34 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 17:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 20:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-05 17:48 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 13:16 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 21:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 15:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 16:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 10:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 16:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 17:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 15:11 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 16:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 20:19 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 20:09 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-10 10:59 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 20:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-08 13:48 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 09:40 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 14:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 18:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 16:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:43 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 09:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-06 15:59 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 13:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 14:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-07 05:58 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 11:41 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 13:25 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-05 21:41 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 17:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 16:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 02:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 02:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 18:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 10:28 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:40 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-04 19:54 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 11:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-03 15:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 20:28 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 18:07 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 13:36 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:21 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 18:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 19:08 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 09:18 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 09:32 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 19:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 07:13 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 13:20 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 15:16 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 23:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 17:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 22:54 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 22:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-01 20:12 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 23:43 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 05:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:35 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-02 20:03 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:10 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 05:50 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-02 10:16 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 12:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 17:21 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 20:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:34 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 21:30 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 22:01 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 22:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 19:57 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 01:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:51 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 02:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:02 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 06:11 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:20 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 12:30 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 12:27 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 18:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW # 10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 12:26 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW and Checkmate #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 13:05 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 16:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 13:18 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW # 10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 16:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 16:22 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 13:30 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 16:18 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 16:45 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 17:24 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 18:05 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 19:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 19:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 19:18 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 20:36 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 21:06 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 21:43 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:52 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-30 23:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2015-09-30 23:24 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 02:11 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:08 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-10-01 15:14 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 21:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. buZZard DoW #7 <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-02 21:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. S¡r¡ Crews <siri.cruise@imf.gov> - 2015-10-02 19:53 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. buZZard DoW #7 <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-02 22:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 22:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 16:48 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 02:25 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 18:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 19:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 23:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 21:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-10-01 21:44 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 15:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 18:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-30 22:34 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-10-01 00:08 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-01 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 09:02 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:42 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-30 13:26 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:08 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 00:26 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 17:32 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 21:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 22:15 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 22:39 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 04:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:30 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:34 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 21:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 21:49 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 22:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 19:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 20:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 15:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 16:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 17:26 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-04 09:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-04 07:34 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-04 11:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-04 09:28 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 19:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 10:54 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:54 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 02:56 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 23:08 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-30 22:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 23:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-01 10:11 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 12:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-02 10:03 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 18:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 16:13 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 18:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 22:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 16:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 20:59 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 15:59 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 08:03 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:08 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:09 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:39 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 22:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:50 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:42 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:24 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 18:47 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:53 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 07:09 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 13:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 14:55 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 08:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:24 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 21:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 09:16 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:14 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:40 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 13:35 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 14:54 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 16:24 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:46 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-30 16:13 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:02 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:37 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 18:35 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-02 10:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-02 20:34 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:09 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:11 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 23:07 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:19 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 08:27 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 17:36 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-29 19:25 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 04:33 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:18 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:15 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:32 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:03 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 19:54 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-29 17:13 -0700
Page 1 of 17 [1] 2 3 … 17 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 09:53 -0500 |
| Subject | The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. |
| Message-ID | <lNqdnYyD2fK5OJfLnZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small hole. Popular Mechanic goes one step further than Mike Walter and claimed that the 757 turned into a liquid and "flowed into the structure." (link at end) Since neither one of those stories is supported by an experiment they can both be considered to be complete bullshit. And talking about complete bullshit everything NIST published about their "Collapse Initiations" was also complete bullshit. And people wonder why so many people can not believe the crap we were told about the Pentagon, why people can not believe the crap we were told about Pranksville, PA and can not believe the crap we were told about the crashes that do not resemble crashes and the collapses in Nuke York City that do not resemble collapses. <G> Rocky http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 11:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mueah6$anc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #277013 |
Rocky wrote: > To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 folded > back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small hole. > > Popular Mechanic goes one step further than Mike Walter and claimed > that the 757 turned into a liquid and "flowed into the structure." (link > at end) > Since neither one of those stories is supported by an experiment they > can both be considered to be complete bullshit. And talking about > complete bullshit everything NIST published about their "Collapse > Initiations" was also complete bullshit. > > And people wonder why so many people can not believe the crap we were > told about the Pentagon, why people can not believe the crap we were > told about Pranksville, PA and can not believe the crap we were told > about the crashes that do not resemble crashes and the collapses in > Nuke York City that do not resemble collapses. <G> > > Rocky > > http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 11:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mueb7a$dlu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #277013 |
Rocky wrote: > To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 folded > back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small hole. > > Popular Mechanic goes one step further than Mike Walter and claimed > that the 757 turned into a liquid and "flowed into the structure." (link > at end) > Since neither one of those stories is supported by an experiment they > can both be considered to be complete bullshit. And talking about > complete bullshit everything NIST published about their "Collapse > Initiations" was also complete bullshit. > > And people wonder why so many people can not believe the crap we were > told about the Pentagon, why people can not believe the crap we were > told about Pranksville, PA and can not believe the crap we were told > about the crashes that do not resemble crashes and the collapses in > Nuke York City that do not resemble collapses. <G> > > Rocky > > http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/ Yup planes turn to liquid and Floooowwwww. <giggle>. And What the hell is a "blast engineer",.....and why would one be called for a "plane crash",...and not a missile designed and expected, to make a blast ? Passeger jet crashes in the US are strictly the jurisdictiom of FAA investigators. And how exactly would a mere mortal be able to pick up the tail section of a 767 passenger jet ??? ....Which is over 30' high And yet not even demand someone take a picture of him demonstrating such super-human powers. The official 9/11 fairytale, just loses more and more credibility as you look at the real facts, and it offers only far more questions than answers
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 17:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o2uqdc-ori.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #277017 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Rocky wrote: >> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 folded >> back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small hole. >> >> Popular Mechanic goes one step further than Mike Walter and claimed >> that the 757 turned into a liquid and "flowed into the structure." (link >> at end) >> Since neither one of those stories is supported by an experiment they >> can both be considered to be complete bullshit. And talking about >> complete bullshit everything NIST published about their "Collapse >> Initiations" was also complete bullshit. >> >> And people wonder why so many people can not believe the crap we were >> told about the Pentagon, why people can not believe the crap we were >> told about Pranksville, PA and can not believe the crap we were told >> about the crashes that do not resemble crashes and the collapses in >> Nuke York City that do not resemble collapses. <G> >> >> Rocky >> >> http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/ > > > > > > > > Yup planes turn to liquid and Floooowwwww. <giggle>. Well, not a liquid, no on claims that, but a big mass of little, tiny pieces which flow much LIKE a liquid, kook. <snip remaining insane kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 13:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mueim2$dgp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #277023 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Rocky wrote: >>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small >>> hole. >>> >>> Popular Mechanic goes one step further than Mike Walter and claimed >>> that the 757 turned into a liquid and "flowed into the structure." >>> (link at end) >>> Since neither one of those stories is supported by an experiment they >>> can both be considered to be complete bullshit. And talking about >>> complete bullshit everything NIST published about their "Collapse >>> Initiations" was also complete bullshit. >>> >>> And people wonder why so many people can not believe the crap we were >>> told about the Pentagon, why people can not believe the crap we were >>> told about Pranksville, PA and can not believe the crap we were told >>> about the crashes that do not resemble crashes and the collapses in >>> Nuke York City that do not resemble collapses. <G> >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yup planes turn to liquid and Floooowwwww. <giggle>. > > Well, not a liquid, no on claims that, but a big mass of little, tiny > pieces which flow much LIKE a liquid, kook. > > <snip remaining insane kook babble> Oh Ya, I get it now. You think the planes were like the water monsters in the movie "The Abyss" http://www.empireonline.com/images/uploaded/abyss-vfx-shot-pseudopod.jpg ....Uhhh you do know that was only A CGI simultion of water monsters, don't you ? WELL DON'T YOU ???? LOOK OUT,.....there are 19 saudi's in control of that water monster.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 18:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oi1rdc-vdj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #277026 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small >>>> hole. >>>> >>>> Popular Mechanic goes one step further than Mike Walter and claimed >>>> that the 757 turned into a liquid and "flowed into the structure." >>>> (link at end) >>>> Since neither one of those stories is supported by an experiment they >>>> can both be considered to be complete bullshit. And talking about >>>> complete bullshit everything NIST published about their "Collapse >>>> Initiations" was also complete bullshit. >>>> >>>> And people wonder why so many people can not believe the crap we were >>>> told about the Pentagon, why people can not believe the crap we were >>>> told about Pranksville, PA and can not believe the crap we were told >>>> about the crashes that do not resemble crashes and the collapses in >>>> Nuke York City that do not resemble collapses. <G> >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Yup planes turn to liquid and Floooowwwww. <giggle>. >> >> Well, not a liquid, no on claims that, but a big mass of little, tiny >> pieces which flow much LIKE a liquid, kook. >> >> <snip remaining insane kook babble> > > > > Oh Ya, I get it now. I highly doubt you "get" much of anything, raving kook. <snip raving kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 14:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ssml0b59cr82sk8t9arol3tsllu15v21i1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #277017 |
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:38:53 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >What the hell is a "blast engineer",..... Try Googling it, dopey. >and why would one be called for a "plane crash" Considering the construction of The Pentagon what other kind of engineer do you think would be better?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 14:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <b6nl0b1l3958q38drqttho7rg39n1aq6o0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #277017 |
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:38:53 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >Passeger jet crashes in the US are strictly the jurisdictiom of FAA >investigators. No, dumbass. I think you mean NTSB. But other agencies are also involved in domestic plane crashes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 17:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vY2dnaJku78zkpbLnZ2dnUU7-WednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #277017 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mueb7a$dlu$1@dont-email.me... > > > Rocky wrote: >> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 folded >> back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small hole. >> >> Popular Mechanic goes one step further than Mike Walter and claimed >> that the 757 turned into a liquid and "flowed into the structure." (link >> at end) >> Since neither one of those stories is supported by an experiment they >> can both be considered to be complete bullshit. And talking about >> complete bullshit everything NIST published about their "Collapse >> Initiations" was also complete bullshit. >> >> And people wonder why so many people can not believe the crap we were >> told about the Pentagon, why people can not believe the crap we were >> told about Pranksville, PA and can not believe the crap we were told >> about the crashes that do not resemble crashes and the collapses in >> Nuke York City that do not resemble collapses. <G> >> >> Rocky >> >> http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/ > > > > > > > > Yup planes turn to liquid and Floooowwwww. <giggle>. > And What the hell is a "blast engineer",.....and why would one be called > for a "plane crash",...and not a missile designed and expected, to make a > blast ? > > Passeger jet crashes in the US are strictly the jurisdictiom of FAA > investigators. > > > And how exactly would a mere mortal be able to pick up the tail section of > a 767 passenger jet ??? > ....Which is over 30' high > And yet not even demand someone take a picture of him demonstrating such > super-human powers. > > > The official 9/11 fairytale, just loses more and more credibility as you > look at the real facts, and it offers only far more questions than answers Well, that explains why there is no website that contains the "Official Story" of 9/11 because they would have to place it with the comics. And since there is no official fairytale site then Popular Mechliars is the site most referred to by posters like dmaster and The Kidd. And that is funny that they would call a "blast engineer" to look at the Pentagon Hoax instead of someone from the FAA or better yet since PM claims it "flowed into the structure" then why didn't someone call a plumber instead of a "blast engineer?" Too bad Popular Mechanics isn't into making cartoons like NIST because I'd love to see how a 757 "flowed into the structure." And the worst part is there are actually people who believe the 9/11 bullshit from PM. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 23:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <72irdc-u1l.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #277037 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: <snip babbling kook idiocy> > And that is funny that they would call a "blast engineer" to look at the > Pentagon Hoax instead of someone from the FAA or better yet since PM claims > it "flowed into the structure" then why didn't someone call a plumber > instead of a "blast engineer?" The FAA doesn't investigate aircraft incidents, babbling kook. <snip remaining babbling kook idiocy> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 19:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muf799$38f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #277043 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <snip babbling kook idiocy> > >> And that is funny that they would call a "blast engineer" to look at >> the Pentagon Hoax instead of someone from the FAA or better yet since >> PM claims it "flowed into the structure" then why didn't someone call >> a plumber instead of a "blast engineer?" > > The FAA doesn't investigate aircraft incidents, babbling kook. > > <snip remaining babbling kook idiocy> In most cases, formal airline accident investigations are the responsibility of either the nation where the accident occurred or by the nation where the aircraft was registered. Depending on the accident, any number of organizations have a major role in the investigation. Typically in the United States, an accident in U.S. territory involving a U.S. registered aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, the airline operating the accident aircraft, the aircraft manufacturer, and the engine manufacturer. If the accident involved sabotage or hijacking, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation would also be involved. So who is this so called blast engineer, and who did he work for, that you claim was immediately called in ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 00:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #277048 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <snip babbling kook idiocy> >> >>> And that is funny that they would call a "blast engineer" to look at >>> the Pentagon Hoax instead of someone from the FAA or better yet since >>> PM claims it "flowed into the structure" then why didn't someone call >>> a plumber instead of a "blast engineer?" >> >> The FAA doesn't investigate aircraft incidents, babbling kook. >> >> <snip remaining babbling kook idiocy> > > > > > In most cases, formal airline accident investigations are the > responsibility of either the nation where the accident occurred or by the > nation where the aircraft was registered. Depending on the accident, any > number of organizations have a major role in the investigation. Typically in > the United States, an accident in U.S. territory involving a U.S. registered > aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the accident > investigation and analysis: the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, > the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, the airline operating the accident > aircraft, the aircraft manufacturer, and the engine manufacturer. If the > accident involved sabotage or hijacking, the U.S. Federal Bureau of > Investigation would also be involved. So you realized you were just babbling, looked it up, and quoted it here. FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident investigations. If sabotage or hijacking was involved, the FBI becomes the lead agency and the NTSB reports it's findings to the FBI. > So who is this so called blast engineer, and who did he work for, that you > claim was immediately called in ? I never claimed any such thing, you raving lunatic, but such would make sense in the real world of sane people, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 19:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-514F19.19175329092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #277055 |
In article <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the accident > > investigation and analysis: the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, > > the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, the airline operating the > FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident investigations. FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since they are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not lead and so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 05:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pv6sdc-i6n.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #277065 |
In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: > In article <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> > aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the accident >> > investigation and analysis: the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, >> > the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, the airline operating the > >> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident investigations. > > FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since they are also > potential targets of the investigation, they do not lead and so prevent risk of > corrupting the investigation. > The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the law says. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 08:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mugm1d$e1s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #277070 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >> In article <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>> aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the >>>> accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National >>>> Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation >>>> Administration, the airline operating the >> >>> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident investigations. >> >> FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since they >> are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not lead and >> so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation. >> > > The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the law > says. Nope,...not once NIST started claiming that it was fires that brought down the towers, NOT PLANES. Another miracle of 9/11 where the rules of the real world were were all suspended for the day, including the rules of physics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 17:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <echtdc-4mr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #277082 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >>> In article <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>> aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the >>>>> accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National >>>>> Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation >>>>> Administration, the airline operating the >>> >>>> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident investigations. >>> >>> FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since they >>> are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not lead and >>> so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation. >>> >> >> The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the law >> says. > > > > > > Nope,...not once NIST started claiming that it was fires that brought down > the towers, NOT PLANES. Apples and oranges, raving kook. The NTSB doesn't care about the buildings; not their job. > Another miracle of 9/11 where the rules of the real world were were all > suspended for the day, including the rules of physics. The only suspension of the laws of physics is by the 9/11 kooks like you. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 15:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-9F6F3B.15214230092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #277102 |
> >>>>> aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the > >>>>> accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National > >>>>> Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation > >>>>> Administration, the airline operating the > >>> > >>>> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident investigations. > >>> > >>> FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since they > >>> are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not lead and > >>> so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation. > >>> > >> > >> The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the law > >> says. And the reason behind the law is to make sure FAA cannot queer an investigation that would show the FAA was at fault. As an independent agency with no crossed loyalities, NTSB can and does blame FAA at times. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 22:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ss5udc-qe.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #277149 |
In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >> >>>>> aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the >> >>>>> accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National >> >>>>> Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation >> >>>>> Administration, the airline operating the >> >>> >> >>>> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident investigations. >> >>> >> >>> FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since they >> >>> are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not lead and >> >>> so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation. >> >>> >> >> >> >> The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the law >> >> says. > > And the reason behind the law is to make sure FAA cannot queer an investigation > that would show the FAA was at fault. As an independent agency with no crossed > loyalities, NTSB can and does blame FAA at times. Actually it is because the 'T' in NTSB stands for Transportation and the NTSB is charted to investigate all transportaton related incidents in the US. From the NTSB web site: "Charged with determining the probable cause of transportation accidents and promoting transportation safety..." Notice it does not say air, land, or marine, just transportation. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 13:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3308e396-cb24-4bc0-bea3-e1a569604276@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #277082 |
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 5:56:06 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Nope,...not once NIST started claiming that it was fires that brought down > the towers, NOT PLANES. > Another miracle of 9/11 where the rules of the real world were were all > suspended for the day, including the rules of physics. that is because it consists of imbeciles like you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v20q0b99ucgj7gnj0gd6u6ggda0hj6lkr5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #277082 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:55:41 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote:
>>> In article <1bmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com>,
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>> aircraft would have the following groups directly involved in the
>>>>> accident investigation and analysis: the U.S. National
>>>>> Transportation Safety Board, the U.S. Federal Aviation
>>>>> Administration, the airline operating the
>>>
>>>> FYI the NTSB always does civilian registered incident investigations.
>>>
>>> FAA, operator, and manufacturer all supply information, but since they
>>> are also potential targets of the investigation, they do not lead and
>>> so prevent risk of corrupting the investigation.
>>
>> The NTSB is the lead investigating agency because that is what the law
>> says.
>
>
>
>Nope,...not once NIST started claiming that it was fires that brought down
>the towers, NOT PLANES.
First, NIST is not the NTSB.
Second, the NIST makes no such claim.
>Another miracle of 9/11 where the rules of the real world were were all
>suspended for the day, including the rules of physics.
Is that how you rationalize your Troofer religion? You claim the
laws of physics were suspended? You would have to.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 17 [1] 2 3 … 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy
csiph-web